Abstract
Acute aortic dissection is a deadly disease that should be recognized promptly. We report an exceptional case of a 44-year-old African American female who presented with a rapidly progressing severe frontal headache. Initial computed tomography of the brain was negative. The following day, she developed uncontrolled hypertension and worsening headache. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was therefore done and showed evidence of acute/subacute ischemic infarcts. The patient was managed as having an ischemic stroke. For that reason, an echocardiogram was done the next day that showed a dilated aortic root and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. This was followed by a computed tomography angiography which showed ascending aortic dissection involving bilateral common carotid arteries. After an urgent surgical intervention, the patient recovered without any sequelae. Patients with an acute dissection can present with atypical clinical features, such as an isolated rapidly progressive headache, which might delay the diagnosis and jeopardize their lives. Hence, high-risk patients with rapidly progressive unexplained severe headaches should be considered for imaging of the aorta.
Keywords: aortic dissection, headache
Introduction
Acute aortic dissection is a catastrophic medical emergency that can affect different parts of the thoracic aorta [1]. Predisposing conditions, such as high blood pressure and connective tissue diseases (like Marfan syndrome), might degenerate the aortic wall. Other associated conditions include atherosclerosis, bicuspid or surgically replaced aortic valve, cocaine use disorder, and Turner syndrome [1-4]. We report a rare case of rapidly progressing severe headache as the sole presenting symptom of this life-threatening condition.
Case presentation
A 44-year-old African American lady with a past medical history of schizophrenia and hypertension presented to the emergency department with a rapidly progressing severe throbbing frontal headache of 10 over 10 intensity. The headache started a few hours before presentation and was associated with generalized weakness, blurry vision, and dizziness. She denied nausea, vomiting, head trauma, any focal neurologic deficit (including loss of sensation or motor power, gait disturbance, dysarthria, and dysphagia), loss of consciousness, chest pain, back pain, shortness of breath, palpitations, or any personal or family history of intracranial bleeding. She is a 30 pack/year smoker with no other history of substance use. Her blood pressure was 107/51 mmHg, her heart rate was 60 beats/min, her respiratory rate was 16 breaths/min, her temperature was 36.6°C, and her oxygen saturation was 95% on room air. On neurologic examination, her cranial nerves examination was insignificant, and there were no other focal neurologic deficits. Signs of meningeal irritation were absent, and papilledema was not seen on fundoscopy. The remainder of the examination was unremarkable. Her laboratory workup showed normal hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cells, renal function, hypokalemia of 2.7 mmol/L (normal: 3.5-5.0 mmol/L), and hypoalbuminemia of 2.9 g/dL (normal: 3.4-5 g/dL) (Table 1).
Table 1. Laboratory values on admission.
| Laboratory parameter | Value | Reference range |
| Hemoglobin | 12.8 g/dL | 12.0-15.0 g/dL |
| Platelets count | 282 k/uL | 140-440 k/uL |
| White blood cells | 9.7 k/uL | 3.9-11.0 k/uL |
| Sodium | 144 mmol/L | 135 - 146 mmol/L |
| Potassium | 2.7 mmol/L | 3.5 - 5.0 mmol/L |
| Creatinine | 0.83 mg/dL | 0.70 - 1.40 mg/dL |
| Blood urea nitrogen | 12 mg/dL | 10 - 25 mg/dL |
| Total bilirubin | 0.5 mg/dL | 0.2-1.0 mg/dL |
| Aspartate aminotransferase | 10 u/L | 15-37 u/L |
| Alanine aminotransferase | 10 u/L | 12-78 u/L |
| Albumin | 2.9 g/dL | 3.4-5 g/dL |
A brain computed tomography (CT) scan was negative for intracranial bleeding. She was then admitted to the regular nursing floor with opioids as needed for her headache. The following day, her blood pressure became uncontrolled with values up to 200/95 mmHg, and she reported a worsening frontal headache. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and its vessels was done that showed possible punctate lacunar infarcts without evidence of a vascular aneurysm, venous thrombosis, or a space-occupying lesion (Figure 1A).
Figure 1. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showing punctate infarcts (white arrows).
The patient was treated as per the standard ischemic stroke protocol: aspirin and statin were initiated as well as nicardipine infusion as needed. The next day, she developed transient chest pain and sudden onset of left leg numbness. On physical examination, a new parasternal early diastolic murmur was found with no significant change in the neurologic examination. A repeat MRI of the brain showed scattered foci of restricted diffusion within the right frontal, parietal, and superior right occipital lobes compatible with an acute or early subacute infarction (Figure 1B).
As a part of the routine stroke/transient ischemic attack workup, transthoracic echocardiography was done, which showed the diameter of the aortic root to be 4.0 cm (normal: less than 2.1 cm) and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. A CT angiography of the chest showed an ascending thoracic aortic dissection with extension into the origin of the left common carotid, right innominate, and right common carotid arteries with significant (90%) luminal narrowing of the proximal right common carotid artery (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Computed tomography angiography showing (A) dilation of the ascending aorta with a diameter around 44 mm, (B and C) dissection of the ascending aorta, and (D) three-dimensional reconstruction of the aorta (with the false lumen in dark red).
Vascular surgery was emergently consulted, and the patient had a successful surgical repair with no significant complications.
Discussion
Patients with a type A aortic dissection typically present with an abrupt onset of severe chest pain (78.9%). Less frequent presentations are abdominal pain, syncope, and ischemic neuropathy [1]. Isolated headache and cervicalgia at presentation are infrequent [5-8], as the involvement of the proximal common carotid artery is uncommon [5-9], and are generally seen in patients with internal carotid artery dissections [10]. On examination, aortic regurgitation murmur has only been found in 44% of patients with type A dissections, uncontrolled hypertension in 35%, pulse abnormality in 19%, and neurologic findings in about 6% of cases [1].
The diagnosis of an acute aortic dissection could be challenging as the symptoms simulate more common diseases [11]. In one study, 39% of the patients with acute aortic dissection got diagnosed after 24 hours of admission [12]. As a matter of fact, physicians have been reported to initially suspect acute aortic dissection in less than half of the patients who have it [2]. Widening of the mediastinum was only seen in 62% of cases and the findings on electrocardiography are nonspecific [1-2]. The sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography of the chest are close to 100% [13], and helical CT can even diagnose atypical subtypes of dissections and is useful for postoperative monitoring. Triple-rule-out CT angiography can be useful in cases of chest pain in the emergency department to rule out aortic disease, pulmonary embolism, and coronary artery disease; however, specific indications for this test are still unclear [14]. MRI is as accurate [13]; however, its use is limited to stable patients. In unstable patients, echocardiography is an alternative to CT. The sensitivity of transesophageal echocardiography is higher than a transthoracic one (more than 90% versus 59%), though the former has a slightly lower specificity (77% versus 83%, respectively) [15-16].
Type A aortic dissection is a surgical emergency [4-5], with inpatient mortality of 24% when a surgical approach is used as compared to 58% with medical treatment alone (p-value less than 0.0001) [17]. Promising results have been seen with endovascular repair of acute aortic dissections [18], but no solid recommendations for this approach have been approved yet.
Blood pressure control is crucial to prevent further shear of the aortic intima. Medications with negative inotropic activity (mainly beta blockers) are the first line, with target systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg and heart rate below 60 beats/min. If that fails, vasodilators and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors could be added [4].
Conclusions
Type A aortic dissection is a life-threatening surgical emergency. Unfortunately, its diagnosis is sometimes challenging due to atypical presentations. In high-risk patients (like those with chronic hypertension and connective tissue disorders) reporting rapidly progressing severe headache—and after excluding an intracranial pathology—diagnostic imaging of the thoracic aorta should be considered. Type A aortic dissection has high mortality regardless of the therapeutic approach, but it can be lowered with early diagnosis and surgical intervention.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained by all participants in this study
References
- 1.The international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD) Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. JAMA. 2000;283:897–903. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.7.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Does this patient have an acute thoracic aortic dissection? Klompas M. JAMA. 2002;287:2262–2272. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.17.2262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Larson EW, Edwards WD. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:849–855. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90418-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:0. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Headache as a manifestation of a life-threatening vascular disorder. Mathys J, Lachat M, Herren T. J Head Face Pain. 2004;44:706–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Headache as the initial manifestation of acute aortic dissection type A. Stöllberger C, Finsterer J, Fousek C, Waldenberger F, Haumer H, Lorenz W. Cephalalgia. 1998;18:583–584. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1808583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thunderclap headache as the main symptom of an acute aortic dissection type A. Rust H, Kimmig H. J Neurol. 2013;260:1925–1926. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-6969-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aortic dissection mimicking subarachnoidal hemorrhage. Nohé B, Ernemann U, Tepe G, Ritz R, Bail D. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:233–234. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154190.06408.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Acute aortic dissection with side branch vessel occlusion: open surgical options. Oderich GS, Panneton JM. Semin Vasc Surg. 2002;15:89–96. doi: 10.1053/svas.2002.33087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Headaches in cervical artery dissections. Mokri B. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2002;6:209–216. doi: 10.1007/s11916-002-0037-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Acute aortic dissection: clinician update. Braverman AC. Circulation. 2010;122:184–188. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Diagnostic difficulties in aortic dissection. Retrospective study of 89 surgically treated patients. Viljanen T. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3579193. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1986;75:328–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aortic dissection diagnosis and follow-up with helical CT. Sebastià C, Pallisa E, Quiroga S, Alvarez-Castells A, Dominguez R, Evangelista A. RadioGraphics. 1999;19:45–60. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.1.g99ja0945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Triple rule out versus coronary CT angiography in patients with acute chest pain. Burris AC, Boura JA, Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:817–825. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging procedures. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V, et al. N Engl J Med. 1993;7:1–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301073280101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Choice of computed tomography, transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and aortography in acute aortic dissection: international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD) Moore AG, Eagle KA, Bruckman D, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:1235–1238. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02316-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Simple risk models to predict surgical mortality in acute type A aortic dissection: the international registry of acute aortic dissection score. Rampoldi V, Trimarchi S, Eagle KA, et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Changes in false lumen after transluminal stent-graft placement in aortic dissections: six years’ experience. Kusagawa H, Shimono T, Ishida M, et al. Circulation. 2005;111:2951–2957. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.480780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


