Abstract
Preclinical evidence suggests that metformin, a widely used antidiabetic drug, may have a sensitizing effect on platinum. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using metformin during platinum-based chemotherapy.
The clinicopathological parameters and survival data of 75 NSCLC patients with T2DM from January 2008 to December 2011 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups: metformin exposure group (n = 27) and non-metformin group (patients using other hypoglycemic agents or no drug for controlling n = 48). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association of metformin usage with overall survival (OS).
Mean follow-up time was 58.7 months. The mean survival time was 36.74 months in the metformin group and 40.21 months in the non-metformin group. There was no significant difference in survival time between the 2 groups (P = .661). After adjusting gender, age, smoking status, tumor stage, tumor histology, and differentiation, multivariate analysis showed that metformin was not associated with the OS in NSCLC patients treated with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 1.071, 95% confidence interval: 0.577–1.986, P = .828).
Our results indicated that metformin exposure had no significant effect on OS in NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to evaluate whether metformin could affect the survival of NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.
Keywords: metformin, NSCLC, platinum, survival, T2DM
1. Introduction
Even though we have made great breakthrough in the diagnosis and therapy of lung cancer in the latest decades, it still leads to high cancer-related deaths with only 5-year survival rate of 10% to 15%.[1,2] Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) takes about 80% to 85% share hold in lung cancer patients and unfortunately, 65% patients with NSCLC are diagnosed with late-stage disease when curative therapy is no longer available. Thereby, chemoradiotherapy is still the primary method for lung cancer therapy.[3,4] Platinum plays an anti-tumor role mainly by directly acting on DNA of tumor cells and forming additives, inhibiting DNA's unwinding and replication.[5] The combined chemotherapy regimen based on platinum is still one of the main treatments for NSCLC.[6] However, the benefit of chemotherapy was generally modest, and sometimes tumor cells develop resistance to platinum after a period of use. Therefore, it is urgent to explore a new strategy to improve the efficiency of platinum drugs.
The overall prevalence of diabetes was about 11.6% in the Chinese adult population,[7] of which type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounts for more than 90%. Fifteen percent to 20% cancer patients suffer from T2DM and the proportion is increasing.[8] Metformin is the most widely prescribed oral hypoglycemic drug worldwide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Metformin can reduce plasma glucose levels by enhancing insulin sensitivity, benefiting patients with various insulin-resistant states, including impaired glucose tolerance, polycystic ovary syndrome, obesity, and metabolic syndrome.[9,10] A large number of preclinical, epidemiological, and clinical studies have found that metformin has an antitumor effect and may affect the prognosis of patients with lung cancer and diabetes.[11] Tan et al[12] found that the patients with diabetes treated with metformin had a longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the difference was statistically significant. Medairos et al[13] found that metformin may be associated with improved PFS in patients with early-stage NSCLC, but has no effect on OS. Researchers also found that metformin can enhance the sensitivity of platinum drugs and reverse resistance.[14,15] However, the effect of metformin on NSCLC patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy is unclear.
This article focuses on the association between metformin and clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients with T2DM treated with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study population
The research project was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. We confirmed that all methods were performed on the basis of the relevant guidelines and regulations. Information of the patients diagnosed with NSCLC was searched in internal medical information system from January 2008 to December 2011 in this study. Inclusion criteria were as follows:
-
(1)
pathological or cytological diagnosis of NSCLC;
-
(2)
T2DM;
-
(3)
treated definitively with platinum-based chemotherapy;
-
(4)
complete clinical data and follow-up data.
Exclusion criteria as follows:
-
(1)
type 1 diabetes mellitus;
-
(2)
patients also had other cancers besides NSCLC. Control subjects were matched to the corresponding cases based on age (within 5-year intervals).
Finally, a total of 75 NSCLC patients with T2DM and concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy were included. 27 patients took metformin for long-term control of diabetes (metformin group), and the others used different hypoglycemic agents or no drug for controlling (non-metformin group).
2.2. Data collection
The medical records of the patients were directly reviewed to reduce bias and collect clinicopathological parameters such as gender, age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) classification, tumor pathology, differentiation, OS, the regimens, and cycles of chemotherapy. All NSCLC patients’ TNM classification using for disease staging was determined on the basis of thoracic and abdominal CT scans, bronchoscopy, MRI imaging of the central nervous system (CNS), whole-body bone scan and/or 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scan. The follow-up duration was from enrolment to the end of December 2016. All patients were followed at an interval of approximately 2 to 3 months. Total follow-up information was collected from clinic visit or from electronic communication methods such as text messaging, telephone and E-mail. The main follow-up information was the survival status of patients, treatment of cancer and control of diabetes. The OS was defined as time from the date of diagnosis to the date of death or last visit.
2.3. Statistical analyses
SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for the statistical analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed by a Chi-squared test. The Kaplan–Meier method was performed to delineate the actuarial survival curves for OS. Log-rank tests were used to compare outcomes. Cox regression was performed to compare survival of patients on metformin versus other medications adjusting for gender, age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, tumor stage, tumor histopathology, and differentiation. Furthermore, the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify whether there was a difference in the OS of each group. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were generated. Statistical significance was set at an alpha value of P <.05.
3. Results
3.1. Patient characteristics
In this study, a total of 75 NSCLC patients who have been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2011 were included. Among the 75 patients, 27 patients were included in the metformin group, and the others were included in the non-metformin group. Follow-up period ended in December 2016 and no one was lost. Median follow-up time was 58.7 months. Clinical records of the 2 groups were collected, and the clinicopathological features were compared by the Chi-square test. There was no significant difference (P >.05) between the 2 groups in gender (male 6/27 vs 12/48), age stratification (≥60 years old 11/27 vs 21/48), alcohol consumption before diagnosis (with drinking history 12/27 vs 20/48), tumor stage (III–IV period 20/27 vs 27/48) and differentiation (poorly differentiated 15/27 vs 27/48). In addition, the non-metformin group had significantly more smoking patients than metformin group (P = .016), and the proportion of patients with squamous cell carcinoma in non-metformin group was higher (P = .024).
3.2. Metformin use and survival prognosis in NSCLC patients
Twenty-five patients were still alive at the last follow-up on December 31, 2016, a total of 51 patients died, of which 32 in non-metformin group and 19 in metformin group. Detailed descriptive data for studies are presented in Table 1. Log-rank test was employed to analyze the differences in OS between the metformin group and the non-metformin group. Metformin group had a mean OS of 36.74 months with the 95% CI: 25.03–48.45 months and median survival time of 18 months with the 95% CI: 9.10–26.91 months. Non-metformin patients had mean OS of 40.21 months with the 95% CI: 31.34–49.08 months and median survival time of 28 months with the 95% CI: 13.30–42.70 months. The difference in survival was not statistically significant (P = 0.661) between the 2 groups. The survival times of the 2 groups are shown in Table 2, and the Kaplan Meier survival curve is shown in Figure 1.
Table 1.
Clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC patients with T2DM treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Table 2.
Comparison of survival time between metformin- and non-metformin-users.

Figure 1.

K–M plot of overall survival for the metformin users versus non-metformin users. K–M = Kaplan–Meier.
Univariate and multivariate analysis found that the general poor OS of NSCLC patients with T2DM was mainly due to high TNM stage (P <.0001) as shown in Table 3. Considering that the factors such as gender, age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, tumor stage, histopathology, and differentiation may affect the patient's survival time, multivariate Cox regression analysis is performed. Results showed that after multiple factors correcting, metformin has no significant effect to the OS of NSCLC patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy (Hazard ratio: 1.071, 95% CI: 0.577 to 1.986, P = .828) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Hazard ratios for survival in NSCLC patients with T2DM treated with and without metformin.

4. Discussion
This study aimed at exploring the effect of metformin on the OS of NSCLC patients with T2DM during platinum-based chemotherapy. Both univariate and multifactor Cox regression showed that metformin exposure had no significant effect on the total survival of NSCLC patients with T2DM treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The average and median survival time was 36.74 (25.03–48.45) months and 18 (9.10–26.91) months respectively in the metformin group. The average and median survival time was 40.21 (31.34–49.08) months and 28 (13.30–42.70) months respectively in the non-metformin group. There is no statistical difference between groups.
Diabetes and lung cancer both are diseases that have a high incidence worldwide. The frequency of NSCLC patients concurrent with diabetes is high. Epidemiological studies have shown that metformin can reduce the risk of cancer development and improve the prognosis of certain cancers, such as colorectal cancer,[16] endometrial cancer,[17] pancreatic cancer,[18] and kidney cancer[19] et al Observational studies have attempted to understand the effect of metformin on the prognosis of lung cancer. Some studies have suggested that the use of metformin is associated with an increased risk of death of lung cancer.[20] However, other studies have shown that metformin benefits the survival of lung cancer patients[21–25] or have no effect[26,27]. Due to the inconsistent results of epidemiological studies, several meta-analyses were carried out and the statistical results showed that the use of metformin could improve the survival of patients with lung cancer.[28–31] In addition, various preclinical studies have found that metformin enhances the anti-tumor effects of platinum and increases their sensitivity by regulating multiple signaling pathways including AMPK-mTOR, ERK1/2, NF-κB.[32–34] Thus, we hypothesized that metformin might benefit lung cancer patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy.
In retrospective epidemiological studies, potential for identifying associations related to sources of biases can never be overlooked. In order to reduce errors and biases, attempts were made by directly reviewing each study subjects’ medical records, by matching controls based on known risk factors, and by using multivariate analysis. An effect-cause error was avoided by insuring metformin use concurrent with platinum-based chemotherapy. However, this study shows that metformin has no significant effect on the OS of NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The inconsistent between the hypothesis and this study may lie in the following reasons: First, this study is single-center retrospective study with small sample size and lack of related clinical data, such as the KPS score, severity of diabetes, chemotherapy regimen, and radiotherapy. Therefore, it may have some bias in the results; In addition, both metformin and cisplatin need the same transporter organic cation transporter-2 (OCT2) to enter into the cell and play the role. Therefore, different from the isolated cell experiment, metformin, and cisplatin will compete for the same transporter in vivo, and then affect the anti-tumor efficacy.
In conclusion, our results indicated that the use of the biguanide metformin was not associated with a survival benefit in NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The full potential effect of metformin use on survival outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy should be further rigorously accessed through randomized trials in the future.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Zheng Xiao-Wei.
Data curation: Zheng Xiao-Wei.
Formal analysis: Xin Wen-Xiu, Ding Hai-Ying.
Investigation: Tong Ying-Hui.
Methodology: Xin Wen-Xiu, Tong Ying-Hui.
Software: Xin Wen-Xiu.
Supervision: Ping Huang.
Validation: Kong Si-Si.
Writing – original draft: Xin Wen-Xiu.
Writing – review & editing: Zhou Xiao-Fang, Ping Huang.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer, OS = overall survival, T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus.
This study was funded by the Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (no. 2015RCB006), Zhejiang Pharmaceutical Association Hospital Pharmaceutical Research Fund (no. 2014ZYY13), the Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Heath Talents (Ping Huang), and Zhejiang 151 Elites Project, the second level (Ping Huang).
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- [1].Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:115–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet (Lond Engl) 2015;385:977–1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R, et al. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:187–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Wang D, Lippard SJ. Cellular processing of platinum anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005;4:307–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Garcia-Campelo R, Bernabe R, Cobo M, et al. SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) 2015. Clin Transl Oncol 2015;17:1020–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Xu Y, Wang L, He J, et al. Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults. JAMA 2013;310:948–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Lee W, Ahn SH, Lee JH, et al. Comparative study of diabetes mellitus resolution according to reconstruction type after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with diabetes mellitus. Obes Surg 2012;22:1238–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Hundal RS, Inzucchi SE. Metformin: new understandings, new uses. Drugs 2003;63:1879–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Rajabi S, Mazloom Z, Zamani A, et al. Effect of low glycemic index diet versus metformin on metabolic syndrome. Int J Endocrinol Metabol 2015;13:e23091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Morales DR, Morris AD. Metformin in cancer treatment and prevention. Ann Rev Med 2015;66:17–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Tan BX, Yao WX, Ge J, et al. Prognostic influence of metformin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cancer 2011;117:5103–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Medairos RA, Clark J, Holoubek S, et al. Metformin exposure is associated with improved progression-free survival in diabetic patients after resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;152:55–61.e51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Liu Y, He C, Huang X. Metformin partially reverses the carboplatin-resistance in NSCLC by inhibiting glucose metabolism. Oncotarget 2017;8:75206–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Quattrini I, Conti A, Pazzaglia L, et al. Metformin inhibits growth and sensitizes osteosarcoma cell lines to cisplatin through cell cycle modulation. Oncol Rep 2014;31:370–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Tian S, Lei HB, Liu YL, et al. The association between metformin use and colorectal cancer survival among patients with diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis. Chronic Dis Transl Med 2017;3:169–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Chu D, Wu J, Wang K, et al. Effect of metformin use on the risk and prognosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2018;18:438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Jian-Yu E, Graber JM, Lu SE, et al. Effect of metformin and statin use on survival in pancreatic cancer patients: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Chem 2018;25:2595–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Li Y, Hu L, Xia Q, et al. The impact of metformin use on survival in kidney cancer patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2017;49:975–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Mazzone PJ, Rai H, Beukemann M, et al. The effect of metformin and thiazolidinedione use on lung cancer in diabetics. BMC Cancer 2012;12:410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Arrieta O, Varela-Santoyo E, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, et al. Metformin use and its effect on survival in diabetic patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2016;16:633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Chen H, Yao W, Chu Q, et al. Synergistic effects of metformin in combination with EGFR-TKI in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and type 2 diabetes. Cancer Lett 2015;369:97–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Dhillon SS, Groman A, Meagher A, et al. Metformin and not diabetes influences the survival of resected early stage NSCLC patients. J Cancer Sci Ther 2014;6:217–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Fortune-Greeley AK, Williams CD, Paulus JK, et al. Association between metformin (M) use and survival among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts). J Clin Oncol 2014;32: [Google Scholar]
- [25].Lin J, Gill A, Zahm SH, et al. Metformin use and survival after non-small cell lung cancer: a cohort study in the US Military health system. Int J Cancer 2017;141:254–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Ahmed I, Ferro A, Cohler A, et al. Impact of metformin use on survival in non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90:S633–4. [Google Scholar]
- [27].Wink KC, Belderbos JS, Dieleman EM, et al. Improved progression free survival for patients with diabetes and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using metformin during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2016;118:453–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Cao X, Wen ZS, Wang XD, et al. The clinical effect of metformin on the survival of lung cancer patients with diabetes: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies. J Cancer 2017;8:2532–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Tian RH, Zhang YG, Wu Z, et al. Effects of metformin on survival outcomes of lung cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Clin Transl Oncol 2016;18:641–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Xin WX, Fang L, Fang QL, et al. Effect of hypoglycemic agents on survival outcomes of lung cancer patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Medicine 2018;97:e0035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Zhong S, Wu Y, Yan X, et al. Metformin use and survival of lung cancer patients: meta-analysis findings. Indian J Cancer 2017;54:63–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Dong H, Huang J, Zheng K, et al. Metformin enhances the chemosensitivity of hepatocarcinoma cells to cisplatin through AMPK pathway. Oncol Lett 2017;14:7807–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Dos Santos Guimaraes I, Ladislau-Magescky T, Tessarollo NG, et al. Chemosensitizing effects of metformin on cisplatin- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines. Pharmacol Rep PR 2018;70:409–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wandee J, Prawan A, Senggunprai L, et al. Metformin enhances cisplatin induced inhibition of cholangiocarcinoma cells via AMPK-mTOR pathway. Life Sci 2018;207:172–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
