Direct Single-Molecule Observation of Sequential DNA Bending Transitions by the Sox2 HMG Box

Abstract

Sox2 is a pioneer transcription factor that initiates cell fate reprogramming through locus-specific differential regulation. Mechanistically, it was assumed that Sox2 achieves its regulatory diversity via heterodimerization with partner transcription factors. Here, utilizing single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy, we show that Sox2 alone can modulate DNA structural landscape in a dosage-dependent manner. We propose that such stoichiometric tuning of regulatory DNAs is crucial to the diverse biological functions of Sox2, and represents a generic mechanism of conferring functional plasticity and multiplicity to transcription factors.

1. Introduction

Sox2 regulates a remarkable variety of genes differentially; it activates some and represses others [1,2,3]. This functional diversity is assumed to be mediated by Sox2 heterodimerization with other transcription factors (TFs) such as Oct4, Oct1, Pax6, and Nanog [4,5]. Recent reports, however, suggest that these canonical partners often remain spatiotemporally separated from Sox2 during genome engagement [6,7,8,9,10]. This raises an important question regarding the TF’s mechanism of action as to how Sox2 alone can exert differential loci-specific regulatory effects.

Sox2 is a sequence-specific high-mobility group transcription factor (HMG-TF) [11]. These TFs have conserved DNA binding domains [12,13], also known as HMG box. These DNA binding domains are partly disordered and are assumed to undergo binding-induced functional disorder-to-order transitions [14]. HMG-TFs are known to cooperatively form heterodimers on DNA regulatory elements [13,15,16,17]; each heteromeric TF pair induces characteristic DNA bend and differentially regulates target gene transcription [18,19,20]. Interestingly, a number of recent studies suggested that Sox2 can also function as homodimers [21,22,23]. Whether and how such Sox2 assemblies alter DNA conformations remain largely unknown. Here, we utilize the strengths of single-molecule Förster/fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) measurements along with ensemble methods to understand the effects of Sox2 binding on regulatory DNA structural landscape in the context of the HMG box (Sox2^HMG). Our results suggest that Sox2^HMG induces stoichiometry-dependent alternate DNA bends and we propose that the resulting alternate DNA conformations may drive different transcriptional outcomes.

2. Results

2.1. Multiple Sox2^HMG Domains Cooperatively Interact with dsDNA^NANOG

In our initial ensemble experiments, we observe that Sox2^HMG cooperatively binds to the NANOG composite promoter (DNA^NANOG; Figure 1). We utilized fluorescence anisotropy to detect Sox2^HMG binding to dsDNA^NANOG (Supplementary Methods). Anisotropy reports on fluorophore rotational properties, dependent on both probe local and global environment perturbations; fluorescence anisotropy of labeled macromolecule usually increases upon ligand binding. To characterize Sox2^HMG-DNA binding, we singly-labeled dsDNA^NANOG with Alexa Fluor 647 (Supplementary Methods) and monitored changes in DNA fluorescence anisotropy with increasing Sox2^HMG concentrations (Figure 1a). Nonlinear least squares (NLS) fitting of the anisotropy data to a Hill equation yields an apparent dissociation constant (K_D) of 15.1 (±2.0) nM and Hill coefficient of 1.5 (±0.3). The estimated K_D is similar to that previously reported for specific DNA-Sox2 interactions [18]. A Hill coefficient greater than 1 indicates that multiple Sox2 HMG boxes bind to the DNA in a TF concentration-dependent fashion [24]. Anisotropy measurements also indicate that Sox2^HMG alone (i.e., the DNA-binding domain in the absence of dsDNA^NANOG) fails to dimerize/oligomerize (Figure S1). To verify the binding of multiple Sox2 molecules to DNA^NANOG, we carried out fluorescence electrophoretic mobility shift assay (fEMSA) of DNA with increasing [Sox2^HMG]. The fEMSA micrograph shows concentration-dependent appearance of multiple electrophoretic species (Figure 1b). This suggests a multistep Sox2^HMG interaction with the NANOG proximal promoter. The non-equilibrium nature of mobility shift assays, however, precludes precise estimation of binding affinities of individual Sox2-DNA assemblies on the basis the fEMSA micrograph [25].

Figure 1.

Sox2 cooperatively binds to the NANOG upstream promoter (DNA^NANOG). (a) DNA binding of Sox2^HMG was probed by monitoring changes in fluorescence anisotropy of Alexa Fluor 647-labeled dsDNA with increasing [Sox2^HMG]. The solid line represents nonlinear least squares (NLS) fit of the data to a Hill equation. NLS-derived parameters: K_D = 15.1 (±2.0) nM, Hill coefficient = 1.5 (±0.3). (b) Fluorescence electrophoretic mobility assay (fEMSA) of Sox2^HMG-DNA^NANOG binding suggests a multistep Sox2^HMG complex formation with dsDNA^NANOG involving multiple protein molecules that are able to bind the DNA partner. (See also Figure S2.)

2.2. Sox2^HMG Induces Sequential dsDNA^NANOG Bending Transitions

Next, we focused on understanding the mechanism of the TF-DNA complex formation. Although the mobility shift assay clearly demonstrates a multistep higher-order Sox2^HMG complex formation with the dsDNA (Figure 1b), our ensemble experiments (i.e., fluorescence anisotropy and fEMSA) were not sensitive enough to determine the stoichiometries of respective TF-DNA complexes. To directly observe Sox2^HMG-DNA^NANOG binding steps, we performed single-molecule fluorescence microscopy experiments that provide key advantages over conventional ensemble methods: (1) individual conformational sub-populations that are averaged out in ensemble measurements can be directly detected; and (2) experiments can be performed with extremely low concentrations of the labeled molecule (typically 50–100 pM). The ability to carry out experiments at low biomolecule concentration provides access and resolution for characterizing individual interaction steps in tightly interacting systems.

We utilized the distance-dependence of FRET to characterize Sox2^HMG-DNA^NANOG interaction at single-molecule resolution. smFRET is sensitive to distance changes in the 20–70 Å range [26], and provides the necessary spatial resolution to probe changes in dsDNA^NANOG conformations as induced by TF binding (estimated end-to-end distance of DNA^NANOG is 57.4 Å, assuming inter-base axial rise of 3.4 Å [27]). For the smFRET experiments, we labeled DNA^NANOG with Alexa Fluor 488 and 594 donor-accepter dye-pair (Supplementary Methods). Bursts of fluorescence from donor and acceptor dyes were recorded as dual-labeled NANOG promoter DNA passed through the sub-fL observation volume of our custom-built ISS Alba confocal laser microscopy system (described previously [28]). These fluorescence intensities were converted to FRET efficiency (E_FRET) histograms, providing a scheme for direct visualization of DNA conformational distributions. Without Sox2^HMG, the dual-labeled DNA showed a single-peak in its E_FRET histogram with histogram width typical of smFRET studies of freely diffusing dsDNA molecules [29,30] (Figure 2a; top panel). An NLS fit of the histogram to a Gaussian function yielded E_FRET value of 0.39 (±0.04). On the basis of this E_FRET value, we estimate the apparent distance between the two dyes to be approximately 64.6 Å (assuming a Förster distance of 60 Å between Alexa 488/594 dyes [31]). This is consistent with the estimated end-to-end distance of dsDNA^NANOG, where the slight increase in the apparent distance (compared to the estimated distance) can be attributed to the linkers present in Alexa dyes.

Figure 2.

smFRET reveals Sox2^HMG concentration-dependent multistep bending of DNA^NANOG. (a) E_FRET histograms of DNA^NANOG with increasing [Sox2^HMG]. (b) [Sox2^HMG]-E_FRET contour map color coded based on fractional occupancy of individual DNA conformations. Corresponding DNA conformations are marked on the contour map. (c) Sox2 binding isotherm of the U ⇋ B_I transition as probed by detecting changes in E_FRET, linked to dsDNA bending transition. The NLS-derived apparent K_D for this binding step is 0.30 (±0.04) nM (binding equation with fixed Hill coefficient of 1). (d) dsDNA^NANOG conformational distributions as modulated by Sox2^HMG concentration, determined from NLS fitting of individual smFRET histograms to Gaussian functions.

Often, histograms of data collected in diffusion-based smFRET experiments show an additional peak at zero E_FRET that arise from molecules with active donor(s) and either inactive or absent acceptor [29,30,32,33,34,35]. These zero E_FRET peaks tend to significantly overlap with low E_FRET peak populations and hamper direct estimation of the position of the non-zero peak(s) [36,37,38,39]. Interestingly, our smFRET histograms lack zero E_FRET peaks (Figure 2a). We attribute this to the absence of dual donor-labeled dsDNA molecules as ensured by sequential labeling of individual DNA strands (Supplementary Methods). Therefore, sequential labeling and purification of individual fluorophore-conjugated oligos prior to duplex formation can be utilized to minimize zero peaks.

DNA bending (also known as DNA looping) is critical for many eukaryotic TF function [40,41,42,43,44]. Accordingly, Sox2 was shown to induce binding-mediated FGF (fibroblast growth factor) enhancer bending [18]. We postulate that similar spatially precise bending is induced in Sox2-DNA^NANOG complexes during gene regulation. To characterize Sox2^HMG binding-induced NANOG promoter DNA bending, we carried out isothermal smFRET Sox2^HMG titration against approximately 100 pM dual-labeled DNA (Figure 2). Our smFRET experiments provide a direct way to distinguish between subtle conformational changes of DNA^NANOG induced upon Sox2 binding. In our smFRET experiments, we observed a multistep bending transition in the DNA structural landscape (Figure 2a). Initially, DNA^NANOG undergoes a cooperative bending to a 0.45 (±0.01) E_FRET state that corresponds to 32.1° (±1.4°) apparent bend angle at low Sox2^HMG concentrations (≤4 nM) (see Supplementary Methods for the details of FRET-to-apparent-angle conversion). NLS fit of the data yields an estimated K_D of 305 (±39) pM (Figure 2c). Such a tight interaction is unlikely to be driven by higher order Sox2^HMG assemblies and we therefore postulate that this dsDNA conformation (henceforth referred as B_I) is induced by binding to single Sox2^HMG molecules.

Our ensemble results suggested that multiple Sox2^HMG can form higher order TF-DNA assemblies (Figure 1). To characterize the complex formation, we probed for changes in DNA^NANOG conformations upon further addition of Sox2 on preformed monomeric Sox2^HMG-DNA^NANOG complexes. With increasing [Sox2^HMG], we observe a progressive reduction of the B_I population and the emergence of a new population exhibiting higher E_FRET (~0.68). This higher E_FRET population corresponds to a DNA^NANOG apparent bend angle of 70° (±2.4°; henceforth referred to as B_II DNA conformation). We infer that this DNA conformation is induced by sequential binding of two individual Sox2 TFs on the dsDNA, where binding of each monomer induces an approximate 32° bend at respective binding sites. Our observed apparent bend angle in the ternary complex (two Sox2 monomers and DNA) is similar to the DNA bend angle previously resolved for heterodimeric HMG box TF-DNA complexes [11,17].

Interestingly, an additional transition is visible in our isothermal smFRET titration when additional Sox2^HMG is added (i.e., >75 nM [Sox2^HMG]). We observe progressive depopulation of the B_II bent DNA conformation and coupled emergence of a population at E_FRET ~0.44 as [Sox2^HMG] increases further (henceforth referred as B_III; Figure 2a). We estimate the apparent bend angle for the B_III population to be 30.4° (±4.5°) from the E_FRET data (Supplementary Methods). A longer fEMSA run also indicates higher-order oligomer formation that is consistent with the formation of B_III population (Figure S2). Mechanistically, Sox family TFs induce DNA bends via FM dipeptide intercalation between two Thymine (T) bases at the minor groove interface [45,46]. Within the NANOG composite promoter, three TT pairs are present: two within the two HMG-TF binding sites (Oct/Sox motifs) identified by Rodda et al. [47] and one in between. We hypothesize that the initial two DNA bends are induced by sequential Sox2 binding to the two high-affinity HMG-TF binding motifs, where each binding induces an apparent 32° bend at the sites of interactions (a net 70° DNA apparent bend angle in the ternary complex). As Sox2^HMG concentration further increases (>75 nM), an additional TF molecule interacts with the DNA at the remaining TT site and induces similar bend albeit at the opposite DNA face. This results in effective reversal of the second bend as evidenced by the increased inter-dye distance (i.e., reduced E_FRET) at higher [Sox2^HMG]. The final bend remains relatively unchanged upon further increase in Sox2 (up to 1 µM; Figure 2d). Overall, our smFRET data directly demonstrates multistep sequential DNA bending transitions dependent on Sox2 concentration.

3. Discussion

Sox2 is a tightly regulated transcription factor; both significant increases and decreases in Sox2 dosage can be detrimental to its biological function [48,49]. Alterations in Sox2 dosage result in multiple developmental and acquired disorders [50,51,52,53,54]. We show that the Sox2 HMG box can induce concentration-dependent alternate DNA bends (Figure 3). Alternate promoter bends are likely to regulate genes differentially and initiate downstream cascades crucial for Sox2’s diverse functions. Our results provide a mechanism for Sox2’s strict dosage dependence in its function-dysfunction dichotomy [50,55,56,57,58].

Figure 3.

Schematic representation of the Sox2 stoichiometry-dependent dsDNA bending transitions.

In summary, our smFRET experiments clearly demonstrate the role of Sox2 dosage in modulating the conformational landscape of HMG box-binding DNA motifs. Previous studies on Sox family members suggested that heterodimeric homeodomain TFs can induce sequential bending as they interact with their DNA partners [59,60,61,62]. Here, we utilize the strengths of smFRET to demonstrate that a representative sequence-specific HMG-TF alone induces concentration-dependent multistep DNA bending transitions. We envision additional layers of tunability for heteromeric HMG-TFs in respective regulatory complexes where affinities of individual transcription factors for DNAs as well as inter-TF interactions can vary dramatically.

4. Materials and Methods

Experimental details are provided in the Supplementary Materials. Briefly, ensemble fluorescence anisotropy and fluorescence electrophoretic mobility assay (fEMSA) experiments were performed in Buffer E (20 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 0.10 mg/mL BSA, 5% glycerol, 0.1 mM DTT/0.05 mM TCEP, pH 8) with Alexa Fluor-647 labeled dsDNA^NANOG (Forward: ACTTTTGCATTACAATG; 17 bp). smFRET experiments were performed in the same buffer using a custom-built confocal fluorescence microscopy set up as described previously [28].

Abbreviations

fEMSA	fluorescence electrophoretic mobility shift assay
FGF	fibroblast growth factor
HMG	high mobility group
NLS	nonlinear least squares
smFRET	single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer
TF	transcription factor

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/12/3865/s1.

Author Contributions

A.C.M.F. and J.C.F. conceived and designed the experiments; M.M.M., P.S.T., K.-J.C., A.C.M.F. and J.C.F. performed the experiments; M.M.M., P.S.T., A.C.M.F. and J.C.F. analyzed the data; M.M.M., A.C.M.F. and J.C.F. wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by laboratory startup funds from the Baylor College of Medicine (A.C.M.F. and J.C.F.). J.C.F. is supported by R01 GM122763 from the NIGMS, NIH.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.