Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2019 Jan 1;75(Pt 1):58–63. doi: 10.1107/S2056989018017371

Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and DFT studies of (E)-1-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-3-(3-fluoro­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one

Muhamad Fikri Zaini a, Ibrahim Abdul Razak a, Mohamad Zahid Anis a, Suhana Arshad a,*
PMCID: PMC6323881  PMID: 30713734

The title halogenated organic chalcone was prepared by a Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was carried out to reveal the percentage contributions of the inter­molecular inter­actions. A theoretical study was performed using the density functional theory (DFT) at B3LYP with the 6–311 G++(d,p) basis set level to compare with the experimental results of the X-ray analysis and UV–vis absorption analysis in term of the geometrical parameters, HOMO-LUMO energy gap and charge distributions.

Keywords: halogen chalcone, crystal structure, DFT, Hirshfeld surface, UV–vis, HOMO–LUMO, mol­ecular electrostatic potential

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title halogenated chalcone derivative, C15H10BrFO, contains two independent mol­ecules, both adopting an s-cis configuration with respect to the C=O and C=C bonds. In the crystal, centrosymmetrically related mol­ecules are linked into dimers via inter­molecular hydrogen bonds, forming rings with R 1 2(6), R 2 2(10) and R 2 2(14) graph-set motifs. The dimers are further connected by C—H⋯O inter­actions into chains parallel to [001]. A Hirshfeld surface analysis suggests that the most significant contribution to the crystal packing is by H⋯H contacts (26.3%). Calculations performed on the optimized structure obtained using density functional theory (DFT) at B3LYP with the 6–311 G++(d,p) basis set reveal that the HOMO–LUMO energy gap is 4.12 eV, indicating the suitability of this crystal for optoelectronic and biological applications. The nucleophilic and electrophilic binding site regions are elucidated using the mol­ecular electrostatic potential (MEP).

Chemical context  

Chalcones are natural or synthetic compounds belonging to the flavonoid family (Di Carlo et al., 1999), consisting of open-chain flavonoids in which the aromatic rings are linked by a three-carbon α,β-unsaturated carbonyl system (Thanigaimani et al., 2015). Chalcone derivatives have attracted significant inter­est in the field of non-linear optics due to their excellent blue-light transmittance, good crystal stability, large non-linear optical coefficients and relatively short cut-off wavelengths of transmittance (Goto et al., 1991; Patil et al., 2006a ,b ; Zhao et al., 2000). The presence of halogen substitutions results in alterations of the physicochemical properties and biological activities of organic compounds, without introducing much major steric change. As a result of this, many researchers have worked intensively on fluorine substitution to develop a wide range of biologically active materials (O’Hagan et al., 2008). As part of our studies in this area, fluoro and bromo substituents were introduced in the title compound and the resulting organic mol­ecular crystal is reported herein in term of its structural stability, the percentage contributions of the various inter­actions to the crystal packing, and electronic charge transfer within the mol­ecule.

Structural commentary  

The asymmetric unit of the title compound [Fig. 1(a)] contains two independent mol­ecules (A and B) with different conformations: the fluoro­benzene group in mol­ecule A is rotated by approximately 180° about the C9—C10 bond with respect to mol­ecule B, the C9⋯C11—C12—F1 torsion angle formed by non-bonded atoms being 178.4 (3) and −177.0 (3)° in mol­ecules A and B, respectively. The optimized structure of the title compound was performed with the Gaussian 09W software package (Frisch et al., 2009) using the DFT method at the B3LYP/6-311 G++(d,p) level to provide information about the mol­ecular geometry.graphic file with name e-75-00058-scheme1.jpg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) The mol­ecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level and (b) the optimized mol­ecular structure of the title compound generated using the DFT method at the B3LYP/6–311 G++(d,p) level.

Bond length and angles are unexceptional and fall within the expected ranges. The enone group (O1/C7–C9) of both mol­ecules A and B adopts s-cis configurations with respect to the C7=O1 [C7A—O1A = 1.207 (4) Å; C7B-–O1B = 1.221 (3) Å] and C8=C9 [C8A—C9A = 1.321 (4) Å; C8B—C9B = 1.322 (4) Å] double bonds. The values of the bond lengths within the enone group obtained by theoretical study are in good agreement with the results of the X-ray analysis (C7–O1 = 1.223 Å; C8–C9 = 1.345 Å). The mol­ecule is essentially planar, the O1—C7—C8—C9 torsion angle being 1.0 (5)° for mol­ecule A and 3.9 (4)° for mol­ecule B. The corresponding torsion angle from the DFT study is −5.024°. This slight deviation from the experimental value is due to the fact that the optimization is performed in isolated conditions, whereas the crystal environment and hydrogen-bonding inter­actions affect the results of the X-ray structure (Zainuri et al., 2017). The C1–C6 (R1) and C10–C15 (R2) phenyl rings in both mol­ecules are approximately coplanar, the dihedral angle they form being 3.75 (15)° and 5.56 (15)° in mol­ecules A and B, respectively. Furthermore, the dihedral angles formed by the mean plane through the enone group [maximum deviation of 0.004 (3) Å for atoms C7A/C8A, and 0.016 (3) Å for atom C7B] and the R1 and R2 rings are 6.3 (2) and 2.6 (2)° in mol­ecule A, and 6.42 (19) and 4.41 (19)° in mol­ecule B.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal packing of the compound, the B mol­ecules are centrosymmetrically connected via inter­molecular C15B—H15B⋯O1B inter­actions, forming a ring with an Inline graphic(14) graph-set motif [Table 1, Fig. 2(a)]. Similarly, the inter­molecular C9A—H9AA⋯O1A and C11A—H11A⋯O1A [Table 1, Fig. 2(b)] hydrogen bonds also connect the A mol­ecules into inversion dimers, forming two Inline graphic(6) and one Inline graphic(10) ring motifs. Finally, the C13A—H13A⋯O1B inter­actions act as a bridge, linking the dimers into chains extending parallel to the c axis (Fig. 3).

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C13A—H13A⋯O1B 0.93 2.52 3.427 (4) 165
C9A—H9AA⋯O1A i 0.93 2.52 3.362 (4) 151
C11A—H11A⋯O1A i 0.93 2.45 3.294 (4) 151
C15B—H15B⋯O1B ii 0.93 2.50 3.377 (4) 157

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Crystal packing of the title compound showing C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (dotted lines). H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding are omitted. The insets show the formation of (a) Inline graphic(14) ring motifs and (b) Inline graphic(6) and Inline graphic(10) ring motifs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Partial crystal packing of the title compound viewed approximately down the a axis showing the formation of a mol­ecular chain parallel to the c axis by C—H⋯O inter­actions (dotted lines).

Hirshfeld Surface analysis  

Hirshfeld surface analysis provides the percentage contribution of the inter­molecular inter­actions inside the unit-cell packing. The surface and the related two-dimensional fingerprint plots were generated with CrystalExplorer3.1 (Wolff et al., 2012). The dnorm and de surfaces are presented in Fig. 4(a) and Fig. 4(b), respectively. All C—H⋯O contacts are recognized in the dnorm mapped surface as deep-red depression areas showing the inter­action between the neighbouring mol­ecules [Fig. 4(a)]. Further existence of these contacts can be visualized under the de surfaces. The side view I (Fig. 4) shows that the A mol­ecules may inter­act through C9A—H9AA⋯O1A and C11A—H11A⋯O1A inter­actions, resulting in the formation of three ring motifs. Meanwhile, side view II (Fig. 4) indicates that for B mol­ecules only one ring motif is achieved through C15B—H15B⋯O1B inter­actions. Two-dimensional fingerprint plots provide information about the major and minor percentage contribution of inter­atomic contacts in the compound. The blue colour refers to the frequency of occurrence of the (di, de) pair and the grey colour is the outline of the full fingerprint (Ternavisk et al., 2014). The fingerprint plots (Fig. 5) show that the H⋯H contacts clearly make the most significant contribution to the Hirshfeld surface (26.3%): there is one distinct spike with a de + di value approximately less than the sum of Van der Waals radii (2.4 Å). In addition, C⋯H/H⋯C and O⋯H/H⋯O contacts contribute 21.2% and 8.3%, respectively, to the Hirshfeld surface. In particular, the O⋯H/H⋯O contacts indicate the presence of inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions where the distance is shorter than the sum of de + di (∼2.32 Å).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Hirshfeld surfaces of the title compound mapped over dnorm and de.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Two-dimensional fingerprint plots with a d norm view showing the percentage contributions to the total Hirshfeld surface.

Frontier mol­ecular orbital and UV–vis Analyses  

Frontier mol­ecular orbital analysis is an important tool in quantum chemistry for studying the mol­ecular electronic charge mobility from the highest occupied mol­ecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied mol­ecular orbital (LUMO). The HOMO–LUMO separation confirms the energy gap of the compound where it is responsible for the ICT (intra­molecular charge transfer) from the end-capping electron-donor groups to the efficient electron-acceptor groups through the π-conjugated path. The electron-density plots of the HOMO and LUMO for the title compound were calculated using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6–311 G++(d,p) level. As seen from the orbital plots (Fig. 6), both HOMO and LUMO extend mainly over the entire mol­ecule, but the mol­ecular orbital localization differs. This can be seen specifically at the enone moiety where the orbital accumulates around the carbon–carbon double bond at the HOMO state whereas it is localized at the carbon–carbon single bond at the LUMO state, indicating conjugation within the mol­ecule. The calculated energy gap, E LUMOE HOMO, is 4.12 eV. The experimental UV–vis absorption spectrum consists of one major band (Fig. 7) occurring in the visible region at 304 nm which was assigned to the π–π* transition. This sharp peak was expected to arise from the carbonyl group of the chalcone (Zainuri et al., 2018). From the UV–vis absorption edge, the calculated energy band-gap value is 3.60 eV, which is similar to that found in a previous study of a related chalcone (Zaini et al., 2018).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Mol­ecular orbitals showing the HOMO–LUMO electronic transitions in the title compound.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The UV–vis absorption spectrum of the title compound.

Mol­ecular electrostatic potential  

The mol­ecular electrostatic potential (MEP) is useful in depicting the mol­ecular size and shape as well as in visualizing the charge distributions of mol­ecules. The MEP map (Fig. 8) of the title compounds was calculated theoretically at the DFT/B3LYP/6–311 G++(d,p) level of theory. The colour grading in the plot represents the electrostatic potential regions in which the red-coloured region is nucleophile and electron rich, the blue colour indicates the electron-poor electrophile region and the white region indicates neutral atoms. These sites provide information about where the intermolecular inter­actions are involved within the mol­ecule (Gunasekaran et al., 2008). The reactive sites are found near the carbonyl group: the region is represented in red and possesses the most negative potential spots. This nucleophile site (negative potential value of −0.04713 a.u.) is distributed around the oxygen atom due to the inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions; in the mol­ecular structure it indicates the strong­est repulsion site (electrophilic attack), whereas the strongest attraction regions (nucleophilic attack) portrayed by the blue spots are localized on the hydrogen atoms.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

The mol­ecular electrostatic potential surface of the title compound calculated at the DFT/B3LYP/6–311 G++(d,p) level.

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.39, last update November 2017; Groom et al., 2016) revealed one closely related compound that differs in the halogen substitution attached to the aldehyde ring, namely 3-(3-bromo­phen­yl)-1-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-prop-2-en-1-one (Teh et al., 2006). Other related compounds, which differ in the halogen substitution at the para-position of the aldehyde ring include (2E)-1-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Dut­kiewicz et al., 2010), 1-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-3-(4-chloro­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Yang et al., 2006), 1,3-bis­(4-bromo­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Ng et al., 2006), (E)-1-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-3-(4-iodo­ophen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Zainuri et al., 2017) and (E)-3-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-1-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Zaini et al., 2018).

Synthesis and crystallization  

The title compound was prepared by a standard Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction at room temperature. A mixture of 4-bromo­aceto­phenone (0.5 mmol) and 3-fluoro­benzaldehyde (0.5 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (20 ml) and the solution stirred continuously. A catalytic amount of NaOH (5 ml, 20%) was added to the solution dropwise until a precipitate formed and the reaction was stirred continuously for about 5 h. After stirring, the solution was poured into 60 ml of ice-cold distilled water. The resultant crude product was filtered and washed successively with distilled water until the filtrate turned colourless. The dried precipitate was further recrystallized to obtain the desired chalcone. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were formed by slow evaporation of an acetone solution.

Refinement  

Details of the crystal data collection and structure refinement are summarized in Table 2. All C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.930 Å) and refined using a riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C). One outlier (3Inline graphic1) was omitted in the last cycles of refinement.

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C15H10BrFO
M r 305.14
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, P Inline graphic
Temperature (K) 296
a, b, c (Å) 6.0090 (4), 10.8695 (7), 20.5616 (12)
α, β, γ (°) 102.803 (1), 96.938 (1), 97.276 (1)
V3) 1283.57 (14)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 3.20
Crystal size (mm) 0.56 × 0.39 × 0.29
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker SMART APEXII Duo CCD area-detector
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)
T min, T max 0.267, 0.455
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 27389, 7437, 4832
R int 0.037
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.703
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.048, 0.158, 1.04
No. of reflections 7437
No. of parameters 325
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.85, −1.35

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2009) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018017371/rz5249sup1.cif

e-75-00058-sup1.cif (31.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018017371/rz5249Isup2.hkl

e-75-00058-Isup2.hkl (407.5KB, hkl)

Comparison of bond lengths and angles between experimental and theoretical studies. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018017371/rz5249sup3.docx

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018017371/rz5249Isup4.cml

CCDC reference: 1878940

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C15H10BrFO Z = 4
Mr = 305.14 F(000) = 608
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.579 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.0090 (4) Å Cell parameters from 8958 reflections
b = 10.8695 (7) Å θ = 2.5–28.0°
c = 20.5616 (12) Å µ = 3.20 mm1
α = 102.803 (1)° T = 296 K
β = 96.938 (1)° Plate, yellow
γ = 97.276 (1)° 0.56 × 0.39 × 0.29 mm
V = 1283.57 (14) Å3

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII Duo CCD area-detector diffractometer 7437 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 4832 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.037
φ and ω scans θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 2.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.267, Tmax = 0.455 k = −15→15
27389 measured reflections l = −28→28

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.158 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0792P)2 + 0.4733P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
7437 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
325 parameters Δρmax = 0.85 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −1.35 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Br1A −0.36851 (7) 1.01488 (4) 0.369778 (19) 0.07958 (15)
F1A 0.5304 (4) 0.3263 (2) 0.74576 (11) 0.0894 (7)
O1A 0.3367 (4) 0.6239 (3) 0.46486 (13) 0.0805 (8)
C1A −0.1316 (5) 0.7958 (3) 0.49478 (14) 0.0533 (6)
H1AA −0.1703 0.7725 0.5333 0.064*
C2A −0.2576 (5) 0.8732 (3) 0.46588 (16) 0.0595 (7)
H2AA −0.3807 0.9017 0.4846 0.071*
C3A −0.1989 (5) 0.9074 (3) 0.40938 (15) 0.0564 (7)
C4A −0.0175 (6) 0.8661 (3) 0.38068 (16) 0.0632 (8)
H4AA 0.0205 0.8903 0.3423 0.076*
C5A 0.1071 (5) 0.7882 (3) 0.40975 (15) 0.0583 (7)
H5AA 0.2293 0.7596 0.3906 0.070*
C6A 0.0523 (4) 0.7524 (2) 0.46713 (13) 0.0462 (5)
C7A 0.1930 (5) 0.6668 (3) 0.49525 (14) 0.0526 (6)
C8A 0.1559 (5) 0.6354 (3) 0.55997 (14) 0.0513 (6)
H8AA 0.0430 0.6682 0.5824 0.062*
C9A 0.2801 (5) 0.5616 (3) 0.58648 (13) 0.0492 (6)
H9AA 0.3932 0.5324 0.5628 0.059*
C10A 0.2592 (5) 0.5208 (2) 0.64885 (12) 0.0457 (5)
C11A 0.4081 (5) 0.4430 (3) 0.66883 (14) 0.0531 (6)
H11A 0.5195 0.4181 0.6433 0.064*
C12A 0.3866 (6) 0.4042 (3) 0.72699 (15) 0.0606 (7)
C13A 0.2265 (6) 0.4381 (3) 0.76688 (15) 0.0685 (9)
H13A 0.2171 0.4102 0.8062 0.082*
C14A 0.0807 (7) 0.5147 (4) 0.74667 (17) 0.0750 (9)
H14A −0.0297 0.5390 0.7727 0.090*
C15A 0.0953 (6) 0.5562 (3) 0.68819 (15) 0.0637 (8)
H15A −0.0050 0.6080 0.6752 0.076*
Br1B −0.33082 (7) −0.20429 (4) 0.72238 (2) 0.09061 (17)
F1B 1.2882 (4) 0.0939 (2) 1.06936 (14) 0.1021 (8)
O1B 0.3006 (4) 0.34757 (19) 0.91642 (11) 0.0632 (5)
C1B −0.0157 (5) 0.1510 (3) 0.83454 (15) 0.0538 (6)
H1BA −0.0513 0.2333 0.8440 0.065*
C2B −0.1694 (5) 0.0535 (3) 0.79170 (15) 0.0587 (7)
H2BA −0.3074 0.0694 0.7722 0.070*
C3B −0.1153 (5) −0.0677 (3) 0.77835 (16) 0.0590 (7)
C4B 0.0883 (6) −0.0930 (3) 0.80586 (19) 0.0730 (9)
H4BA 0.1231 −0.1754 0.7959 0.088*
C5B 0.2415 (5) 0.0063 (3) 0.84882 (17) 0.0646 (8)
H5BA 0.3799 −0.0101 0.8677 0.077*
C6B 0.1921 (5) 0.1289 (3) 0.86397 (13) 0.0484 (6)
C7B 0.3501 (5) 0.2405 (2) 0.90990 (13) 0.0483 (6)
C8B 0.5623 (5) 0.2192 (3) 0.94716 (14) 0.0522 (6)
H8BA 0.6019 0.1378 0.9396 0.063*
C9B 0.6961 (5) 0.3151 (3) 0.99126 (13) 0.0481 (5)
H9BA 0.6479 0.3943 0.9971 0.058*
C10B 0.9115 (5) 0.3113 (2) 1.03206 (12) 0.0458 (5)
C11B 0.9974 (5) 0.1983 (3) 1.03227 (15) 0.0574 (7)
H11B 0.9164 0.1202 1.0071 0.069*
C12B 1.2032 (6) 0.2045 (3) 1.07027 (16) 0.0623 (7)
C13B 1.3312 (5) 0.3157 (3) 1.10868 (15) 0.0611 (7)
H13B 1.4703 0.3159 1.1341 0.073*
C14B 1.2459 (6) 0.4271 (3) 1.10829 (14) 0.0607 (7)
H14B 1.3291 0.5046 1.1335 0.073*
C15B 1.0377 (5) 0.4254 (3) 1.07085 (13) 0.0527 (6)
H15B 0.9816 0.5016 1.0717 0.063*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Br1A 0.0856 (3) 0.0670 (2) 0.0818 (3) 0.01918 (18) −0.02313 (19) 0.02390 (17)
F1A 0.1164 (18) 0.0866 (14) 0.0753 (13) 0.0378 (13) −0.0027 (12) 0.0375 (11)
O1A 0.0840 (17) 0.1058 (19) 0.0857 (16) 0.0548 (15) 0.0438 (14) 0.0557 (15)
C1A 0.0548 (15) 0.0585 (16) 0.0497 (14) 0.0147 (12) 0.0070 (12) 0.0166 (12)
C2A 0.0569 (16) 0.0606 (17) 0.0612 (16) 0.0184 (13) 0.0026 (13) 0.0134 (13)
C3A 0.0599 (16) 0.0471 (14) 0.0552 (15) 0.0058 (12) −0.0141 (13) 0.0115 (11)
C4A 0.073 (2) 0.0651 (18) 0.0542 (16) 0.0068 (15) 0.0018 (14) 0.0268 (14)
C5A 0.0599 (17) 0.0622 (17) 0.0578 (16) 0.0161 (13) 0.0103 (13) 0.0206 (13)
C6A 0.0467 (13) 0.0440 (12) 0.0471 (13) 0.0050 (10) 0.0029 (10) 0.0128 (10)
C7A 0.0535 (15) 0.0521 (14) 0.0570 (15) 0.0134 (12) 0.0103 (12) 0.0191 (12)
C8A 0.0537 (15) 0.0519 (14) 0.0521 (14) 0.0143 (12) 0.0119 (12) 0.0153 (11)
C9A 0.0504 (14) 0.0487 (13) 0.0495 (13) 0.0093 (11) 0.0076 (11) 0.0129 (11)
C10A 0.0509 (14) 0.0421 (12) 0.0417 (12) 0.0054 (10) 0.0032 (10) 0.0083 (10)
C11A 0.0605 (16) 0.0479 (13) 0.0482 (14) 0.0101 (12) 0.0009 (12) 0.0090 (11)
C12A 0.075 (2) 0.0516 (15) 0.0514 (15) 0.0051 (13) −0.0077 (14) 0.0159 (12)
C13A 0.083 (2) 0.078 (2) 0.0440 (15) 0.0016 (17) 0.0046 (15) 0.0221 (14)
C14A 0.077 (2) 0.098 (3) 0.0557 (17) 0.021 (2) 0.0217 (16) 0.0213 (18)
C15A 0.071 (2) 0.0728 (19) 0.0533 (16) 0.0248 (16) 0.0120 (14) 0.0185 (14)
Br1B 0.0727 (3) 0.0615 (2) 0.1139 (3) 0.01018 (17) −0.0328 (2) −0.00307 (19)
F1B 0.0907 (16) 0.0653 (13) 0.140 (2) 0.0298 (11) −0.0343 (15) 0.0209 (13)
O1B 0.0684 (13) 0.0461 (10) 0.0725 (13) 0.0170 (9) −0.0053 (10) 0.0128 (9)
C1B 0.0542 (16) 0.0488 (13) 0.0599 (15) 0.0171 (11) 0.0020 (12) 0.0147 (12)
C2B 0.0498 (15) 0.0613 (17) 0.0632 (17) 0.0151 (13) −0.0054 (13) 0.0153 (13)
C3B 0.0537 (16) 0.0529 (15) 0.0638 (16) 0.0070 (12) −0.0068 (13) 0.0091 (13)
C4B 0.0655 (19) 0.0492 (16) 0.093 (2) 0.0170 (14) −0.0145 (17) 0.0023 (15)
C5B 0.0523 (16) 0.0541 (16) 0.081 (2) 0.0168 (13) −0.0117 (14) 0.0102 (14)
C6B 0.0473 (13) 0.0519 (14) 0.0472 (13) 0.0113 (11) 0.0024 (11) 0.0151 (11)
C7B 0.0513 (14) 0.0462 (13) 0.0483 (13) 0.0105 (11) 0.0034 (11) 0.0138 (10)
C8B 0.0528 (15) 0.0472 (13) 0.0567 (15) 0.0134 (11) 0.0017 (12) 0.0134 (11)
C9B 0.0520 (14) 0.0462 (13) 0.0477 (13) 0.0114 (11) 0.0055 (11) 0.0135 (10)
C10B 0.0506 (14) 0.0462 (13) 0.0410 (12) 0.0097 (10) 0.0056 (10) 0.0112 (10)
C11B 0.0600 (16) 0.0450 (13) 0.0626 (16) 0.0068 (12) −0.0056 (13) 0.0125 (12)
C12B 0.0648 (18) 0.0560 (16) 0.0659 (17) 0.0164 (14) −0.0031 (14) 0.0176 (14)
C13B 0.0552 (16) 0.0719 (19) 0.0547 (15) 0.0077 (14) −0.0022 (13) 0.0190 (14)
C14B 0.0633 (18) 0.0603 (17) 0.0484 (14) 0.0039 (13) −0.0039 (13) 0.0017 (12)
C15B 0.0635 (17) 0.0485 (14) 0.0438 (13) 0.0121 (12) 0.0054 (12) 0.0060 (11)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Br1A—C3A 1.894 (3) Br1B—C3B 1.898 (3)
F1A—C12A 1.365 (4) F1B—C12B 1.362 (4)
O1A—C7A 1.207 (4) O1B—C7B 1.221 (3)
C1A—C2A 1.381 (4) C1B—C2B 1.376 (4)
C1A—C6A 1.390 (4) C1B—C6B 1.393 (4)
C1A—H1AA 0.9300 C1B—H1BA 0.9300
C2A—C3A 1.367 (5) C2B—C3B 1.374 (4)
C2A—H2AA 0.9300 C2B—H2BA 0.9300
C3A—C4A 1.378 (5) C3B—C4B 1.371 (4)
C4A—C5A 1.383 (4) C4B—C5B 1.386 (4)
C4A—H4AA 0.9300 C4B—H4BA 0.9300
C5A—C6A 1.385 (4) C5B—C6B 1.379 (4)
C5A—H5AA 0.9300 C5B—H5BA 0.9300
C6A—C7A 1.494 (4) C6B—C7B 1.499 (4)
C7A—C8A 1.481 (4) C7B—C8B 1.477 (4)
C8A—C9A 1.321 (4) C8B—C9B 1.322 (4)
C8A—H8AA 0.9300 C8B—H8BA 0.9300
C9A—C10A 1.461 (4) C9B—C10B 1.465 (4)
C9A—H9AA 0.9300 C9B—H9BA 0.9300
C10A—C15A 1.387 (4) C10B—C15B 1.388 (4)
C10A—C11A 1.393 (4) C10B—C11B 1.393 (4)
C11A—C12A 1.368 (4) C11B—C12B 1.366 (4)
C11A—H11A 0.9300 C11B—H11B 0.9300
C12A—C13A 1.371 (5) C12B—C13B 1.368 (5)
C13A—C14A 1.373 (5) C13B—C14B 1.375 (5)
C13A—H13A 0.9300 C13B—H13B 0.9300
C14A—C15A 1.383 (5) C14B—C15B 1.383 (4)
C14A—H14A 0.9300 C14B—H14B 0.9300
C15A—H15A 0.9300 C15B—H15B 0.9300
C2A—C1A—C6A 121.0 (3) C2B—C1B—C6B 121.4 (3)
C2A—C1A—H1AA 119.5 C2B—C1B—H1BA 119.3
C6A—C1A—H1AA 119.5 C6B—C1B—H1BA 119.3
C3A—C2A—C1A 119.1 (3) C3B—C2B—C1B 118.8 (3)
C3A—C2A—H2AA 120.4 C3B—C2B—H2BA 120.6
C1A—C2A—H2AA 120.4 C1B—C2B—H2BA 120.6
C2A—C3A—C4A 121.4 (3) C4B—C3B—C2B 121.6 (3)
C2A—C3A—Br1A 119.5 (2) C4B—C3B—Br1B 119.2 (2)
C4A—C3A—Br1A 119.0 (2) C2B—C3B—Br1B 119.2 (2)
C3A—C4A—C5A 119.1 (3) C3B—C4B—C5B 118.9 (3)
C3A—C4A—H4AA 120.5 C3B—C4B—H4BA 120.5
C5A—C4A—H4AA 120.5 C5B—C4B—H4BA 120.5
C4A—C5A—C6A 120.8 (3) C6B—C5B—C4B 121.1 (3)
C4A—C5A—H5AA 119.6 C6B—C5B—H5BA 119.5
C6A—C5A—H5AA 119.6 C4B—C5B—H5BA 119.5
C5A—C6A—C1A 118.6 (3) C5B—C6B—C1B 118.2 (3)
C5A—C6A—C7A 117.8 (2) C5B—C6B—C7B 123.8 (2)
C1A—C6A—C7A 123.6 (2) C1B—C6B—C7B 118.0 (2)
O1A—C7A—C8A 120.4 (3) O1B—C7B—C8B 120.9 (3)
O1A—C7A—C6A 119.5 (2) O1B—C7B—C6B 119.5 (2)
C8A—C7A—C6A 120.0 (2) C8B—C7B—C6B 119.6 (2)
C9A—C8A—C7A 121.3 (3) C9B—C8B—C7B 120.4 (2)
C9A—C8A—H8AA 119.4 C9B—C8B—H8BA 119.8
C7A—C8A—H8AA 119.4 C7B—C8B—H8BA 119.8
C8A—C9A—C10A 127.1 (3) C8B—C9B—C10B 127.6 (2)
C8A—C9A—H9AA 116.4 C8B—C9B—H9BA 116.2
C10A—C9A—H9AA 116.4 C10B—C9B—H9BA 116.2
C15A—C10A—C11A 119.3 (2) C15B—C10B—C11B 118.6 (3)
C15A—C10A—C9A 122.1 (3) C15B—C10B—C9B 118.7 (2)
C11A—C10A—C9A 118.6 (2) C11B—C10B—C9B 122.7 (2)
C12A—C11A—C10A 118.4 (3) C12B—C11B—C10B 118.6 (3)
C12A—C11A—H11A 120.8 C12B—C11B—H11B 120.7
C10A—C11A—H11A 120.8 C10B—C11B—H11B 120.7
F1A—C12A—C11A 118.2 (3) F1B—C12B—C11B 118.3 (3)
F1A—C12A—C13A 118.3 (3) F1B—C12B—C13B 117.7 (3)
C11A—C12A—C13A 123.5 (3) C11B—C12B—C13B 123.9 (3)
C12A—C13A—C14A 117.6 (3) C12B—C13B—C14B 117.3 (3)
C12A—C13A—H13A 121.2 C12B—C13B—H13B 121.3
C14A—C13A—H13A 121.2 C14B—C13B—H13B 121.3
C13A—C14A—C15A 121.1 (3) C13B—C14B—C15B 120.8 (3)
C13A—C14A—H14A 119.5 C13B—C14B—H14B 119.6
C15A—C14A—H14A 119.5 C15B—C14B—H14B 119.6
C14A—C15A—C10A 120.1 (3) C14B—C15B—C10B 120.8 (3)
C14A—C15A—H15A 119.9 C14B—C15B—H15B 119.6
C10A—C15A—H15A 119.9 C10B—C15B—H15B 119.6
C6A—C1A—C2A—C3A −0.2 (5) C6B—C1B—C2B—C3B 0.3 (5)
C1A—C2A—C3A—C4A 0.2 (5) C1B—C2B—C3B—C4B −0.9 (5)
C1A—C2A—C3A—Br1A −179.4 (2) C1B—C2B—C3B—Br1B 177.4 (2)
C2A—C3A—C4A—C5A 0.1 (5) C2B—C3B—C4B—C5B 0.8 (6)
Br1A—C3A—C4A—C5A 179.6 (2) Br1B—C3B—C4B—C5B −177.5 (3)
C3A—C4A—C5A—C6A −0.3 (5) C3B—C4B—C5B—C6B −0.1 (6)
C4A—C5A—C6A—C1A 0.3 (5) C4B—C5B—C6B—C1B −0.5 (5)
C4A—C5A—C6A—C7A 179.3 (3) C4B—C5B—C6B—C7B −179.9 (3)
C2A—C1A—C6A—C5A 0.0 (4) C2B—C1B—C6B—C5B 0.4 (4)
C2A—C1A—C6A—C7A −179.0 (3) C2B—C1B—C6B—C7B 179.8 (3)
C5A—C6A—C7A—O1A −5.7 (4) C5B—C6B—C7B—O1B 174.3 (3)
C1A—C6A—C7A—O1A 173.3 (3) C1B—C6B—C7B—O1B −5.2 (4)
C5A—C6A—C7A—C8A 174.3 (3) C5B—C6B—C7B—C8B −6.3 (4)
C1A—C6A—C7A—C8A −6.8 (4) C1B—C6B—C7B—C8B 174.2 (3)
O1A—C7A—C8A—C9A 1.0 (5) O1B—C7B—C8B—C9B 3.9 (4)
C6A—C7A—C8A—C9A −179.0 (3) C6B—C7B—C8B—C9B −175.5 (3)
C7A—C8A—C9A—C10A −178.7 (3) C7B—C8B—C9B—C10B −179.7 (3)
C8A—C9A—C10A—C15A 0.9 (5) C8B—C9B—C10B—C15B 173.9 (3)
C8A—C9A—C10A—C11A −179.6 (3) C8B—C9B—C10B—C11B −4.5 (5)
C15A—C10A—C11A—C12A 0.0 (4) C15B—C10B—C11B—C12B −0.5 (4)
C9A—C10A—C11A—C12A −179.4 (3) C9B—C10B—C11B—C12B 177.9 (3)
C10A—C11A—C12A—F1A 178.9 (3) C10B—C11B—C12B—F1B −178.9 (3)
C10A—C11A—C12A—C13A −0.2 (5) C10B—C11B—C12B—C13B 0.2 (5)
F1A—C12A—C13A—C14A −178.9 (3) F1B—C12B—C13B—C14B 178.8 (3)
C11A—C12A—C13A—C14A 0.3 (5) C11B—C12B—C13B—C14B −0.3 (5)
C12A—C13A—C14A—C15A −0.1 (6) C12B—C13B—C14B—C15B 0.6 (5)
C13A—C14A—C15A—C10A −0.1 (6) C13B—C14B—C15B—C10B −0.9 (5)
C11A—C10A—C15A—C14A 0.1 (5) C11B—C10B—C15B—C14B 0.8 (4)
C9A—C10A—C15A—C14A 179.6 (3) C9B—C10B—C15B—C14B −177.7 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C13A—H13A···O1B 0.93 2.52 3.427 (4) 165
C9A—H9AA···O1Ai 0.93 2.52 3.362 (4) 151
C11A—H11A···O1Ai 0.93 2.45 3.294 (4) 151
C15B—H15B···O1Bii 0.93 2.50 3.377 (4) 157

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia grant 203.PFIZIK.6711606.

References

  1. Bruker (2009). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Di Carlo, G., Mascolo, N., Izzo, A. A. & Capasso, F. (1999). Life Sci. 65, 337–353. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Dutkiewicz, G., Veena, K., Narayana, B., Yathirajan, H. S. & Kubicki, M. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1243–o1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Caricato, M., Li, X., Hratchian, H. P., Izmaylov, A. F., Bloino, J., Zheng, G., Sonnenberg, J. L., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Montgomery, J. A. Jr, Peralta, J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E., Kudin, K. N., Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell, A., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Rega, N., Millam, J. M., Klene, M., Knox, J. E., Cross, J. B., Bakken, V., Adamo, C., Jaramillo, J., Gomperts, R., Stratmann, R. E., Yazyev, O., Austin, A. J., Cammi, R., Pomelli, C., Ochterski, J. W., Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Zakrzewski, V. G., Voth, G. A., Salvador, P., Dannenberg, J. J., Dapprich, S., Daniels, A. D., Farkas, O., Foresman, J. B., Ortiz, J. V., Cioslowski, J. & Fox, D. J. (2009). GAUSSIAN09. Gaussian Inc., USA.
  5. Goto, Y., Hayashi, A., Kimura, Y. & Nakayama, M. (1991). J. Cryst. Growth, 108, 688–698.
  6. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Gunasekaran, S., Kumaresan, S., Arunbalaji, R., Anand, G. & Srinivasan, S. (2008). J. Chem. Sci. 120, 780–785.
  8. Ng, S.-L., Shettigar, V., Razak, I. A., Fun, H.-K., Patil, P. S. & Dharmaprakash, S. M. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o1421–o1423.
  9. O’Hagan, D. (2008). Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 308–319.
  10. Patil, P. S., Teh, J. B.-J., Fun, H.-K., Razak, I. A. & Dharmaprakash, S. M. (2006a). Acta Cryst. E62, o896–o898.
  11. Patil, P. S., Teh, J. B.-J., Fun, H.-K., Razak, I. A. & Dharmaprakash, S. M. (2006b). Acta Cryst. E62, o1710–o1712.
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Teh, J. B.-J., Patil, P. S., Fun, H.-K., Razak, I. A. & Dharmaprakash, S. M. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o2399–o2400.
  15. Ternavisk, R. R., Camargo, A. J., Machado, F. B. C., Rocco, J. A. F. F., Aquino, G. L. B., Silva, V. H. C. & Napolitano, H. B. (2014). J. Mol. Model. 20, 2526–2536. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Thanigaimani, K., Arshad, S., Khalib, N. C., Razak, I. A., Arunagiri, C., Subashini, A., Sulaiman, S. F., Hashim, N. S. & Ooi, K. L. (2015). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 149, 90–102. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., McKinnon, J. J., Turner, M. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2012). CrystalExplorer. University of Western Australia, Perth.
  18. Yang, W., Wang, L. & Zhang, D. (2006). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 36, 195–198.
  19. Zaini, M. F., Arshad, S., Ibrahim, A. R., Khalib, N. C. & Zainuri, D. A. (2018). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1083, 012047.
  20. Zainuri, D. A., Arshad, S., Khalib, N. C., Razak, I. A., Pillai, R. R., Sulaiman, S. F., Hashim, N. S., Ooi, K. L., Armaković, S., Armaković, S. J., Panicker, C. Y. & Van Alsenoy, C. (2017). J. Mol. Struct. 1128, 520–533.
  21. Zainuri, D. A., Razak, I. A. & Arshad, S. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 1427–1432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao, B., Lu, W.-Q., Zhou, Z.-H. & Wu, Y. (2000). J. Mater. Chem. 10, 1513–1517.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018017371/rz5249sup1.cif

e-75-00058-sup1.cif (31.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018017371/rz5249Isup2.hkl

e-75-00058-Isup2.hkl (407.5KB, hkl)

Comparison of bond lengths and angles between experimental and theoretical studies. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018017371/rz5249sup3.docx

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018017371/rz5249Isup4.cml

CCDC reference: 1878940

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES