Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017 Oct 16;17(1):32–49. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2017.1362721

Effects of Social and Spatial Contexts on Young Latinas’ Methamphetamine Use Initiation

Ann M Cheney 1, Christine N Newkirk 2, Vhuhwavho M Nekhavhambe 3, Matthew Baron Rotondi 4, Alison Hamilton 5,6
PMCID: PMC6324933  NIHMSID: NIHMS1501192  PMID: 29035155

Abstract

In this paper we examine methamphetamine (meth) use initiation as influenced by Latinas’ social positions within institutions (e.g., family and economy). We conducted ethnographic fieldwork in five women’s residential substance use treatment facilities in Los Angeles County with women who considered meth to be their primary drug of choice. Using an urban ethnographic framing, we demonstrate the effects of low-income young Latinas’ spatial- and social-context rendered vulnerability to abuse and neglect, and the resulting emotional distress, on meth use initiation. When considering pathways to substance use intervention for vulnerable. Latina girls and women, clinicians, researchers, and policy makers need to understand substance use pathways as dynamic processes to cope with psychosocial stress while living in communities with easy access to illicit substances like methamphetamine.

Keywords: Latinas, family, economy, childhood sexual abuse, domestic abuse, methamphetamine, social institutions, sociology, urban ethnography

Introduction

While girls and women abuse most illegal substances at rates much lower than men (Miech, Johnston, O’Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2016; SAMHSA, 2014), adolescent girls are more likely to use methamphetamine (meth) than boys (Rawson et al., 2005), and adult women’s lifetime meth use is only slightly lower than men’s use (Cohen et al., 2007; Durell et al., 2008). Women are attracted to meth initially because it facilitates weight loss (Bretch et al., 2004), bolsters self-confidence (Lopez-Zetina et al., 2010), boosts energy and increases alertness (Semple, Grant, & Patterson, 2004), and enhances sexual experiences and pleasure (Rawson, Washton, Domier, & Reiber, 2002). However, women overwhelmingly report chronic meth use to escape emotional pain and cope with symptoms of anxiety and depression (Hser, Evans, & Huang, 2005; Lopez-Zetina et al., 2010; Semple et al., 2004).

There is reason to believe that a high proportion of women meth users have abusive histories (Morgan & Beck 1999), and that meth use may mediate the effects of sexual abuse on women’s emotional and psychological health (Berg, Hobkirk, Joaska, & Mead, 2016). For instance, in a study among incarcerated drug-using women, nearly three-fourths (72%) reported meth use and almost two-thirds (63.5%) reported both childhood sexual assault (CSA) and adult sexual assault (ASA) (Vik & Ross, 2003). The Methamphetamine Treatment Project, a three-year multi-site study that evaluated meth treatment programs, found over half (58%) of women meth users entering substance use treatment reported a sexual assault history. These women were also more likely than non-victims to demonstrate psychological distress such as anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation (Christian et al., 2007).

Previous work begs the question: How is sexual trauma exposure connected to women’s meth use and adult sexual behaviors? We sought to answer this question through ethnographic work at female residential substance use facilities in Los Angeles (LA). The research began with the assumption that nearly all women in treatment would report CSA and/or ASA, and sexual trauma would drive women’s meth use and sexual behaviors, particularly risk behaviors. As we show in this paper, CSA was the root cause of meth use among many but not all women in the study. Broader macro-level factors and women’s marginalized positions within key social institutions (family and economy) created an environment of risk for CSA and adverse experiences that put and kept women’s meth use in motion. Our analysis of Latina women’s meth use histories illuminates how meth use and abuse arise at the intersection of individual psychosocial forces such as sexual abuse, neglect and psychological distress, and macro-level forces including family- and community-level drug involvement and generational economic marginalization.

Urban Ethnography: Application to Latina Adolescents Methamphetamine Use

Historically, Latinas have reported lower illicit drug use compared to national population estimates (Lindenberg, Gendrop, Nencioli, & Adames, 1994); however, Latinas of lower socioeconomic status report two to three times higher rates of illicit drugs (Lindenberg et al., 2002). This pattern persists among Latina meth users. Mexican-American women, who are among the most socio-economically disadvantaged (e.g., poorer and less educated) Latino subgroup (Elder, Ayala, Parra-Medina, & Talavera, 2009), report higher rates of meth use than other Latino subgroups (SAMHSA, 2009).

We frame our research within urban ethnography. Urban ethnography, unlike classical ethnographic anthropological fieldwork, grew out of an intellectual curiosity toward the complexities of city life and human interaction in densely populated settings (Duneier, 2014; Jackson, 1985). Urban ethnographers have shown the adaptive nature of the anti-social, illegal, and violent behavior often typifying the modern urban landscape; behaviors developed in response to abandonment by unstable families and a lack of potential for social mobility exemplified by poor-paying and contingent work (Anderson, 1999; Duneier & Carter, 1999; Wilson, 1987).

We consider how two major social institutions: family and the economy, did not provide needed emotional, social, cultural, and material resources for the women in our study, contributing to a shared experience of marginality and vulnerability. By employing a critical perspective and situating our analysis within a framework of urban ethnography, we shed light on how institutional inequality disadvantages women of color, places them in marginal and precarious positions, and increases their vulnerability to CSA and adverse life stressors, contributing to poor emotional and psychological health and putting them on the pathway to substance use.

METHODS

Setting

This study was based on one year (2006-2007) of ethnographic and qualitative data collection with 19 participants, conducted in five women-and-children only residential substance use treatment centers in the Greater LA area. Over the past decades, meth use has increased substantially in the US. In California, meth has surpassed alcohol and other illicit drugs as the leading cause of treatment admission (SAMHSA, 2014) and is women’s primary substance of abuse at treatment admission (California Department of Alcohol & Drug Programs, 2011). Recent research mapping the spread of meth during the latter half of the 1990s and early 2000s—the height of the meth epidemic in California—found its use spread most rapidly in low-income White and Hispanic communities with below average employment rates (Gruenewald et al., 2013). In LA, treatment admissions for meth use among Latinas increased from 46% in 2001 to 77% in 2005 (Crèvecoeur, Rutkowski, & Rawson, 2007). Therefore the analysis presented in this paper focuses on the substance use experiences of Latinas, primarily of Mexican descent, who were adolescents coming of age in low-income areas of Southeast LA County in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

The majority of these women grew up in Southeast LA, also known as The Gateway Cities, in predominantly Latino communities of persons of Mexican descent. The Gateway Cities are characterized by high unemployment rates, low labor force participation, and low incomes correlated with low educational attainment. Nearly a quarter of households made less than $24,999 per year—estimate based on five-year average (Mitchell, Bahl, Jackson, Taveras, & Young, 2015).

Recruitment

An organization directing several residential substance abuse treatment facilities in LA County agreed to allow recruitment in their women’s residential facilities. Flyers were posted in each facility. Interested women called the senior author or told facility staff of their interest, and the staff contacted the PI. As word of the study spread through the facilities, more women indicated their interest in participating. Potential participants had to: be 18 years or older, be English-speaking, consider meth their primary drug of choice, and have been in residential treatment (at the current facility or elsewhere) for at least six months. Study procedures were approved by the UCLA Office for the Protection of Research Subjects.

Participant Observation and Person-centered Interviews

Upon approval of the parent organization administrators and facility directors, the senior author and PI of the study (an anthropologist) spent time in the facilities, getting to know the staff and the daily routines at each. This period of participant observation allowed her the opportunity to develop the feasibility of the interviews and familiarity with the facility, staff, and clientele. This participant observation approach was consistent with what Clifford (1997) and then Geertz (1998) termed “deep hanging out,” i.e., immersing oneself in groups on an informal level. This approach, which helps to establish trust based in part on the consistent physical presence of the researcher, can be especially useful when investigating sensitive topics such as the impact of meth on women’s sexual experiences and behaviors. Because the settings were residential (rather than outpatient), ample opportunities existed for informal interaction and to observe the daily dynamics of everyday life (e.g., playing with children, cooking meals, listening to music, and watching television). Descriptive fieldnotes (Sanjek, 1990) were taken at the end of every encounter at each facility, whether or not interviews were conducted.

Face-to-face interviews took place at the treatment facilities. Participants had to have at least six months of residential treatment to be eligible for the study; given the sensitivity of the primary topic (women’s sexuality), it was important to ensure that 1) women had been “clean” (abstinent from meth) for a substantial period of time in order to articulate their experiences, and 2) that they had continual access to mental health professionals (available 24/7 in these facilities). The analysis is therefore limited by recall bias: women may not accurately remember aspects of their meth use initiation and the contexts in which initiation occurred. Furthermore, because we excluded Latinas whose primary language was Spanish from study participation, our findings likely reflect the experiences of more linguistically acculturated Latinas. Linguistic acculturation is strongly linked to substance use among Latina adolescents: as girls move through the acculturation process and their social networks change (e.g., from supervised bilingual to unsupervised English monolingual networks), their substance use risk increases (Kulis, Marsiglia, Kopak, Olmsted, & Crossman, 2012; Marsiglia, Kulis, Hussaini, Nieri, & Becerra, 2010).

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and all participants provided consent to a follow-up interview. All participants completed a background survey and provided locator information for follow-up interviews. All interviews were conducted by the PI. Interviews lasted an average of 1 ½ hours, and ranged from 45 minutes to 3 hours. Interviews were digitally recorded and professionally transcribed. Participants received $25 Target gift cards at the conclusion of the interviews.

Interviews typically began with an anchoring question about when the participant first started using any drug or alcohol—as typical in 12-step-oriented treatment facilities, they all had their ‘stories’ about becoming addicted to drugs (Hänninen & Koski-Jännes, 1999). In a person-centered, psychological anthropology orientation (Levy & Hollan, 1998), the interviewer probed into topics and experiences that were especially salient for the participants. Although all participants answered the same range of questions, the length and detail of their responses varied as they were encouraged to expound upon what was important to them in a conversational style.

We used an inductive approach to analyze texts and identify emergent themes (Bernard & Ryan, 2010; Ryan & Bernard, 2003). We then used constant comparison to understand the relationships between themes and to compare and contrast themes within and across women’s meth use experiences (Strauss & Corbin, 1990). This inductive approach helps to ensure hypotheses generated by the findings are grounded in, rather than imposed upon, the data (Kearney, Murphy, Irwin, & Rosenbaum, 1995).

Results

Sample Description

The average age of participants was 28.1 years, with a range of 18–39 years. All women in the analytic sample (n=19) self-reported as Latina. Over half (58%) had not completed high school, 26% had a high school diploma or GED, and 16% had taken some college courses. Only one woman was employed; the remainder (95%) were unemployed and receiving public assistance. Over three-quarters (84%) had never been married, 16% had been married, and 10% were divorced or separated. All had children, and approximately one quarter (26%) had more than 3 children. Less than one-quarter (21%) of the women were on probation or parole or both (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Participant characteristics (n=19)

Characteristic Total Mean, percentages
Race/ethnicity
 Latina 17 89%
 Biracial 2 11%
Age 28 (range, 18-39)
 ˂ 30 years 13 68%
  ≥ 30 years 6 32%
Highest education
 Some college 3 16%
 HS/GED 5 26%
 Less than HS 11 58%
Marital status
 Married 1 5%
 Never married 16 84%
 Divorced/Separated 2 11%
# of children
 ≤ 3 children 14 74%
 > 3 children 5
Age at first child 19.5 (range, 15-25)
Income*
 Welfare 17 94%
 Employment 1 6%
Probation/parole 4 21%
Substance use history
Alcohol 12 63%
 Alcohol and illicit drugs 8 42%
Age at first meth use 15 (range, 9-18)
Meth introduction
 Family member 5 26%
 Friend 9 47%
 Intimate partner 5 26%
Previous residential treatment 8 42%
*

Missing data

With regard to substance use history, participants were an average age of 15 when they started using meth. Two started using when they were nine; eleven started using between the ages of 12-17; and 6 started using at age 18 or older (ages 18 to 23). Nearly all were introduced to meth by family members or friends; five were introduced by intimate partners (boyfriends). Sixteen participants progressed from snorting to smoking meth, though five women alternated between snorting and smoking. Only one participant injected meth; most did not inject because they were afraid of needles or felt they should stay away from injecting for fear they would like the feeling “too much.” Other routes of administration, including rectal insertion of meth and mixing meth with alcohol, were noted, but were not the primary routes of use for any participants. Most participants used other drugs before meth use initiation. In the year prior to the interviews, 63% had used other drugs (typically alcohol & marijuana) in addition to meth. Almost half (42%) had been in residential treatment prior to the current facility (see Table 1).

Overview

Latina participants grew up in low-income communities of color characterized by multiple family households, visible drug use, and easy access to alcohol and drugs in Southeast LA. The women in our study grew up in unstable families with little protection from drug use situations or pro-drug use norms. Most women began using cigarettes, marijuana, and alcohol during their early adolescence and later tried meth.

The majority (84%) used meth to “numb” their feelings and escape the emotional pain associated with interpersonal violence (e.g., sexual assault and domestic violence) and loss (e.g., death of a close family member). Over half (52%) discussed a history of childhood sexual assault (CSA), which they typically referred to as molestation. Women’s experiences of molestation ranged from inappropriate touching, attempted penetration, and actual penetration perpetrated by known older males. Some of these women endured abuse over several years, whereas others experienced CSA once or twice. Of the women who described CSA histories, 70% experienced intrafamilial CSA perpetrated by brothers, male cousins, uncles, a grandfather, and/or their mother’s male partner.

As outlined in Figure 1, women’s emotional and psychological distress is linked to their marginalized social positions within two key social institutions: family and the economy. Latinas’ disadvantaged positions within these institutions heightened their vulnerability to abuse and neglect, resulting in emotional distress, which contributed to meth use.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Conceptual Model Delineating Latina Meth Use Pathways

How does CSA explain meth use?

Women with histories of CSA were well aware that their drug use was intimately connected to their abuse, feelings of betrayal and shame, and desire to escape the lingering emotional pain. Mary, who experienced childhood sexual abuse, shared that her brother, “somebody that was supposed to protect” her, perpetrated the abuse. She began using at the age of thirteen. “I started with mostly hallucinogens, the whole acid, mushroom, heroin – the things that would just kind of like take me out, I guess, of myself,” she said. In her late teens (age 18 or 19), Mary’s brother and his friend introduced her to meth: “And, that [meth] like rocked my world.” She used meth to escape:

And that’s where drugs led me…I could be like away from everybody and just be okay. It made me not think. I didn’t have to answer to anybody. I just could be Mary and, who I thought was Mary, and just be on my own.

Mari-carmen described a long and complex history of abuse. When she was 10, her uncle sexually abused her. The abuse continued throughout her childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. She explained why she endured years of sexual abuse:

We have a lot of girls in our family, so as long as I stayed victim, none of the other girls got touched. He was like the favorite uncle, the youngest, that every girl – all the girls would go to the movies with, ‘cause he has a daughter himself. And he was just Uncle [xx]. He was like the best u-, uncle in the world and – but I kept his interest.

Mari-carmen was well aware that she began using drugs to cope with her sexual abuse history: “I started using when I was 10. I used pharmaceutical pills, my mom works for a doctor. And at the same time I was, I started getting molested, so I felt awkward.” She also started to use alcohol. “It gave me false courage,” she said. By using alcohol, Mari-carmen had “enough courage just to go on and not tell anybody” about the sexual abuse. When she was 14, Mari-carmen’s male cousin introduced her to meth. By the age of 17 she was using meth “full blown,” and before entering the treatment program she was “basting meth” (anal administration with a turkey baster) to get “instant gratification.” Meth use and its immediate effects, she said, “took me away from my problems.”

Why doesn’t CSA explain all women’s meth use?

While women with CSA histories articulated a clear pathway from CSA to meth use, for nearly half the sample CSA was not the cornerstone of their meth use initiation. For most women (including the women with CSA histories), the entanglements of family disarray and economic marginalization set their meth use in motion.

Family disarray

Nearly all of the women (84%) discussed growing up within drug-using family contexts; many were exposed to intergenerational drug use (by siblings, parents, and grandparents) and some to drug manufacturing and selling. Many lived in unstable intergenerational and multi-family households with maternal-related siblings (i.e., siblings with same mother but different fathers). Women frequently described their fathers as absent (largely because of drug addiction, divorce/separation, or incarceration), and their parents as offering limited attention and care, being unresponsive to their needs, and not being physically or emotionally present in their childhood and adolescence.

The emotional turmoil emerging from family disarray (e.g., domestic violence, a troubled mother-daughter relationship) precipitated women’s meth use. Socoro described the connections between her “dysfunctional” and abusive parents and her eventual meth use:

There was a lot of abuse in the house. My dad was an alcoholic and Maria, which is my mother—I don’t call her mom—she was very mean towards me. And there was a lot of abuse between my parents—a lot of fighting, cops coming to the house—a lot of that stuff.

She began using marijuana and her father’s beer at the age of thirteen. Her parents, who she described as “never home,” were unaware of her substance use. To escape the dysfunction and abuse, one of her four sisters committed suicide, and Socoro entered a gang and began using:

I used because I wanted to get away from the situations at home. I was tired of having a controlling father, a mother that never cared, never gave a hoot about me – and she would always be sending me away. So, I guess, I wanted a family and I chose gang life.

As a gang member, she used heavily. With other gang members, Socoro used PCP, acid, mushrooms, heroin, and eventually meth. When she started using meth at age 20, she was immediately hooked.

Alma’s experience provides insight into the dimensionality of women’s pathways to meth use. For her, and many women in CSA histories, family disarray (neglectful and abusive parents) created an environment that put their meth use in motion. Alma shared how her experience of being “handed” away by her mother and history of abuse was connected to her meth use:

They [Department of Children and Family Services] . . . told my mom: ‘Either you ask [my mother’s boyfriend] to leave or she’s staying right here [in my aunt’s house]. And, a more permanent plan--so we know we don’t have to come back--is for you to give guardianship to [my paternal aunt], if you’re not gonna leave him.’ And she signed me over. And I got up, I remember, it – everything was done in front of me.

She was on the cheering team at the time. Alma recalled watching her mother sign the paperwork, standing up, and leaving the house for her game. She described herself as a “product of the system” and explained how her anger, life problems, and drug use stem from maternal neglect: “[My mother] was co-dependent on a man who sexually molested me. She didn’t wanna leave him so she signed me over to my aunt.” Her mother’s boyfriend sexually abused Alma while her mother was in the room:

And, my mom was in the room, she was asleep and, but there was, you know, just it’s like a lot of touching . . . It wasn’t like full-fledged penetration or anything like that, but it was bad enough to jack me up the way it did. And not necessarily the act [sexual abuse], but the way my mom didn’t respond.”

With a sarcastic tone, she said: “So, now we know where all the issues stem from basically is my mother.” Alma began using alcohol at the age of 12, and marijuana and meth at age 15.

Economic marginalization

The women in the study grew up in households where their parent(s) were largely absent because of low-income, non-contingent, or informal employment (e.g., drug trade). Over half (52%) of women talked about their parents, namely mothers, working long hours and having more than one job. Specifically, 26% of women were raised by single mothers who were often absent because they worked two jobs. Consequently, as children and adolescents, these women were left unsupervised or in the care of other members of the household (e.g., mother’s boyfriend, grandparents, or other relatives).

Women often talked about their parents as “hard workers,” describing long hours at shift work, or in the service sector. They talked about their parents as being absent (physically and emotionally), which, for some, affected their emotional well-being and contributed to later drug use. Reflecting on her childhood, Sara said she felt as if she received no love or attention from her parents who “were always working”:

When I, when I was growing up as a little kid I felt like if I was like the oddball, you know? I mean, my mom and dad were there all the time, but the love wasn’t there that I needed. You know, there was a big empty hole inside of me, ‘cause I wanted attention and I wanted to be loved. And I didn’t have that from my parents – they were always working or too busy, you know, doing this and doing that to provide for us…All I wanted was love and attention from my mom and my dad, and I never did get it.

Sara’s mother physically abused her and her siblings; she hit them and was emotionally abusive. Sara described herself as “always nervous” growing up. She bit her nails, her hands were always sweaty, and she never asked questions. In her later years of high school, she met her husband who introduced her to meth. “And when he introduced me to meth, that was it—it was, you know, I fell in love with it and I was—I just got stuck on that.”

Other women’s experiences shed light on the precarious situation of children experiencing parental absence because of low-wage employment. Nadia, who was sexually abused by a male babysitter at the age of 12, said:

When I was molested, it wasn’t - the reason why I got so angry at my mom and to resent [her], was because I would beg her to stay home from work and she wouldn’t stay home. But I wouldn’t tell her why. And that was happening to me, but I would never—I wasn’t never able to open up to my mother.

The abuse continued for several months. When Nadia was 17, she began using meth with her boyfriend, who was physically and emotionally abusive. In addition to her CSA history, a series of later traumatic events, including a miscarriage and gang rape, perpetuated her meth use. Meth and getting high “took away” her pain.

Discussion

An in-depth examination of the Latinas’ meth use histories illustrates the situation of their substance use initiation at the intersection of psychosocial factors and macro-level social forces. The women in our study overwhelmingly began using meth to obtain emotional relief from histories of abuse (sexual, physical, and emotional)—histories illuminating the intimate connections between their suffering and broader social and economic inequalities (Baer, Singer, Susser, 1997). These women grew up in contexts plagued by unstable housing, precarious employment, and pervasive family- and community-level drug use. The findings echo the work of others who have found that being born into and raised in drug-using families (Johnson et al., 1998; Valdez, Neaigus, & Kaplan, 2008) and the collective stress of poverty, social disadvantage, and economic marginalization (Dunlap, Golub, & Johnson, 2006; Dunlap & Johnson, 1992; Garcia, 2010) contribute immensely to the intergenerational transmission of drug use.

Even though women in our study did not typically attribute initial meth use to interpersonal violence (e.g., weight loss was a common initial rationale), as their stories progressed and as they developed rapport with the interviewer, many articulated a connection between their trauma exposures and meth use. Over half of the women in our study experienced childhood sexual abuse, most commonly perpetrated by trusted male family members (e.g., uncles, mother’s partner), and discussed the associated emotional and psychological distress. Although there is limited knowledge on the effects of childhood sexual abuse specific to women meth users (Svingen et al., 2016), childhood sexual abuse is common among women substance abusers (Cheney, Dunn, Booth, Frith, & Curran, 2013; Palacios, Urmann, Newel, & Hamilton, 1999; Widom, Marmorstein, & White, 2006; Wilsnack, Vogeltanz, Klassen, & Harris, 1997). Similar to other women meth users, the women in our sample used meth to self-medicate and “erase” their emotional and psychological pain (Simpson et al., 2016; von Mayrhauser, Brecht, & Anglin, 2001); these experiential phenomena have well-established neurophysiological correlates (Dean, Kohno, Hellemann, & London, 2014; Thompson et al., 2004). Meth was a likely choice given its low cost and widespread availability in their family and community contexts.

Family systems for these women did not serve as spaces of support, but rather as the very space where drugs were introduced and encouraged. The majority of women in our study recounted stories of domestic violence and sexual abuse and the resulting feelings of anger, resentment, and betrayal. The experiences of the Latinas in our study corroborate other studies showing how childhood victimization and abuse are root causes of women’s meth use (Cohen et al., 2003; Dluzen & Liu, 2008; Hamilton & Goeders, 2010; Meade et al., 2012; Svingen et al., 2016). Furthermore, the economic system failed to provide sufficient wages to support a family, forcing parents to work long hours or find higher wages in the informal economy. Consequently, women grew up in households with limited parental presence and supervision, fostering feelings of neglect and placing women in precarious situations (e.g., sexual victimization) that heightened their vulnerability to meth use.

We surmise that these women’s meth use histories reflect those of other Latinas who came of age in the 1980s and 1990s in the high poverty environments of Southeast LA. These women grew up during the height of the meth epidemic when national estimates of use were as high as 9% in 1999. Since then, meth use has declined, hitting a historic low of less than 3% in 2015 (CDC, 2015), due in large part to regulatory and policy changes related to methamphetamine manufacture (McBride et al., 2011). Youth continue to report meth use; however, opiates, inhalants, and amphetamines are now more commonly used (Miech et al., 2016). Nonetheless, meth use continues to be a primary reason for treatment admissions and drug-related incarceration, with meth accounting for most drug sentences in California (“State Sentencing: How Drug Sentencing Varies Across the U.S,” 2014). Internationally, according to the 2016 United Nations World Drug Report, amphetamines are the second most commonly used drug in the world (after cannabis).

Because all the women spoke fluent English, and several discussed the tension between Latino (e.g., “My parents were so protective of me.”) and mainstream American values (e.g., “I wanted [to be] independent.”), the women seemed to be navigating two or more cultural systems. Latino cultural traditions (i.e., values and norms), including more conservative gender ideologies (e.g., strict parental monitoring of girls more than boys) and gender-specific substance use norms (e.g., stigmatizing attitudes around girls’ and women’s substance), tend to protect adolescent Latinas navigating two or more cultural systems (e.g., Mexican-American) from drug-using peers and situations (Kulis et al., 2012). Women raised in drug-using families were perhaps not exposed to these norms and values, whereas women raised by families characterized by strict parental monitoring of girls may have used drugs to reject more conservative Latino values, assert independence, and redefine their identity. More detailed information about the relationship between acculturation level and Latinas’ substance use is needed to explore these ideas.

Conclusion

Ethnographic studies examine alcohol and drug use from a holistic perspective and place individual experience within macro-level processes, structures of power, and symbolic meaning systems (Organista, Chun, & Marin, 2013; Page & Singer, 2010). Previous urban ethnographers have shown that low-wage, contingent work in the Black urban ghetto is a byproduct of globalization (Wilson, 1987, 2011); the violent “code of the street” is rooted in the absence of social service structure (Anderson, 1999); and sidewalk cultures of selling second hand items and panhandling on city streets are byproducts of gentrification and political fiscal policies (Duneier & Carter, 1999). Using an urban ethnographic framing, we demonstrated the intimate connection between young Latina’s meth use and the pain of family disarray with economic marginalization.

The complexities of these women’s meth use pathways demonstrate the value of using an urban ethnographic framing to more fully understand the effects of low-income young Latinas’ spatial- and social-context on meth use initiation. Too often, clinical discourses of substance abuse pathologize individual experiences of dependence and addiction, and overlook the social origins of substance abuse (Singer, 2006). Our analysis illuminates how institutional inequalities place adolescents of color in marginal spaces, and vulnerability to abuse and neglect can result in the emotional distress and feelings of invisibility underlying, prompting initiation of substance use.

Recommendations

Women’s drug use tends to decrease as they age, with the highest use among adolescent girls and young women (Stevens et al., 2005). When considering pathways to substance use intervention for marginalized Latina girls and women, clinicians, researchers, and policy makers need to understand the dimensionality of women’s pathways and consider institutional support to increase Latinas’ ability to cope with psychosocial stress while living in communities with easy access to illicit substances like methamphetamine.

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K01 DA017647 to Dr. Alison Hamilton. At the time of the analysis and manuscript preparation, Dr. Ann Cheney was a Scholar with the HIV/AIDS, Substance Abuse, and Trauma Training Program (HA-STTP), at the University of California Los Angeles; supported through an award from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R25 DA035692), and Ms. Vhuhwavho M. Nekhavhambe was a Scholar with the Tirisano Training Program at the University of California Los Angeles, supported through an award from the National Institute of Mental Health (R25 MH108170). The PI wishes to express appreciation to Southern California Alcohol and Drug Programs for their support of this study, and to the women who shared their experiences.

Contributor Information

Ann M. Cheney, School of Medicine, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California Riverside, 900 University Ave, Riverside CA 9252

Christine N. Newkirk, School of Medicine, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California Riverside, 900 University Ave, Riverside CA 92521

Vhuhwavho M. Nekhavhambe, Department of Psychology, University of South Africa, 1 Preller St, Pretoria, 0002.

Matthew Baron Rotondi, Department of Sociology, University of California Riverside, 900 University Ave, Riverside CA 92521

Alison Hamilton, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, Box 175919, Los Angeles, California 90024-1759 VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.

References

  1. Anderson E. Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. 1st. New York: W.W. Norton; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baer H, Singer M, Susser I. Medical anthropology and the world system: A critical perspective. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg MK, Hobkirk AL, Joska JA, Meade CS. The role of substance use coping in the relation between childhood sexual abuse and depression among methamphetamine users in South Africa. Psychological Trauma. 2016 doi: 10.1037/tra0000207. epub. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernard HR, Ryan GW. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourgois PI. In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourgois PI, Lettiere M, Quesada J. Social misery and the sanctions of substance abuse: Confronting HIV risk among homeless heroin addicts in San Francisco. Social Problems. 1997;44(2):155–173. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourgois PI, Schonberg J. Righteous Dopefiend. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brecht M-L, O’Brien A, von Mayrhauser C, Anglin MD. Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addictive Behaviors. 2004;29(1):89–106. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(03)00082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. California Department of Alcohol & Drug Programs. Fact sheet: Women in treatment Office of Applied Research and Analysis. 2011 Retrieved July 12, 2017, from: http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/wwwtest.adp.ca.gov/ContentPages/2458978245.pdf.
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in the prevalence of marijuana, cocaine, and other illegal drug use national YRBS: 1991-2015. 2015 Retrieved August 16, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/trends/2015_us_drug_trend_yrbs.pdf.
  12. Cheney AM, Dunn A, Booth BM, Frith L, Curran GM. The intersections of gender and power in women veterans’ experiences of substance use and VA care. Annals of Anthropological Practice. 2013;37(2):149–171. [Google Scholar]
  13. Christian DR, Huber A, Brecht ML, McCann MJ, Marinelli-Casey P, Lord RH, Reiber C, Lu TH. Methamphetamine users entering treatment: characteristics of the methamphetamine treatment project sample. Substance Use & Misuse. 2007;42(14):2207–22. doi: 10.1080/10826080701209341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clifford J. Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen JB, Dickow A, Horner K, Zweben JE, Balabis J, Vandersloot D, Methamphetamine Treatment Project Abuse and violence history of men and women in treatment for methamphetamine dependence. The American Journal on Addictions/American Academy of Psychiatrists in Alcoholism and Addictions. 2003;12(5):377–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cohen JB, Greenberg R, Uri J, Halpin M, Zweben JE. Women with methamphetamine dependence: research on etiology and treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2007;(Suppl 4):347–351. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2007.10399896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Congressional Budget Office. The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2011. Congress of the United States; 2014. (No. 49440) [Google Scholar]
  18. Crèvecoeur D, Rutkowski B, Rawson RA. The rise in treatment admissions for methamphetamine use in Los Angeles County from 2001 through 2005. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2007;(Suppl 4):383–392. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2007.10399899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dean AC, Kohno M, Hellemann G, London ED. Childhood maltreatment and amygdala connectivity in methamphetamine dependence: a pilot study. Brain Behaviors. 2014;4(6):867–76. doi: 10.1002/brb3.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dluzen DE, Liu B. Gender differences in methamphetamine use and responses: a review. Gender Medicine. 2008;5(1):24–35. doi: 10.1016/s1550-8579(08)80005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Duneier M. The urban ethnography reader. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  22. Duneier M, Carter O. Sidewalk. New York, NY: MacMillian; Publishers: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dunlap E, Golub A, Johnson BD. The severely-distressed African American family in the crack era: Empowerment is not enough. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. 2006;33(1):115–139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dunlap E, Johnson BD. The setting for the crack era: Macro forces, micro consequences (1960–1992) Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1992;24(4):307–321. doi: 10.1080/02791072.1992.10471656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Durell TM, Kroutil LA, Crits-Christoph P, Barchha N, Van Brunt DL. Prevalence of nonmedical methamphetamine use in the United States. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2008;3(19):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Elder JP, Ayala GX, Parra-Medina D, Talavera GA. Health communication in the Latino community: issues and approaches. Annual Review of Public Health. 2009;30:227–251. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Garcia A. The pastoral clinic: addiction and dispossession along the Rio Grande. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. Geertz C. Deep hanging out. The New York Review of Books. 1998;45(16):69. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gonzales R, Mooney L, Rawson RA. The methamphetamine problem in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health. 2010;31:385–398. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gruenewald PJ, Ponicki WR, Remer LG, Waller LA, Zhu L, Gorman DM. Mapping the spread of methamphetamine abuse in California from 1995 to 2008. American Journal of Public Health. 2013;103(7):1262–1270. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hamilton A. The vital conjuncture of methamphetamine-involved pregnancy: Objective risks and subjective realities. In: Fordyce Lauren, Maraesa Aminata., editors. Risk, Reproduction, and Narratives of Experience. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 2012. pp. 59–77. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hamilton AB, Goeders NE. Violence perpetrated by women who use methamphetamine. Journal of Substance Use. 2010;15(5):313–329. doi: 10.3109/14659890903431611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hänninen V, Koski-Jännes A. Narratives of recovery from addictive behaviours. Addiction. 1999;94(12):1837–1848. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.941218379.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Herman-Stahl MA, Krebs CP, Kroutil LA, Heller DC. Risk and protective factors for nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and methamphetamine among adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2006;39(3):374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hispanic or Latino, percent, July 1, 2015. 2015 Retrieved August 17, 2016, from http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/RHI725215/06037.
  36. Hser YI, Evans E, Huang YC. Treatment outcomes among women and men methamphetamine abusers in California. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;28(1):77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jackson P. Urban ethnography. Progress in Human Geography. 1985;9(2):157–176. [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson BD, Dunlap E, Maher L. Nurturing for careers in drug use and crime: conduct norms for children and juveniles in crack-using households. Substance Use & Misuse. 1998;33(7):1511–1546. doi: 10.3109/10826089809069811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kearney MH, Murphy S, Irwin K, Rosenbaum M. Salvaging self: a grounded theory of pregnancy on crack cocaine. Nursing Research. 1995;44(4):208–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kulis SS, Marsiglia FF, Kopak AM, Olmsted ME, Crossman A. Ethnic identity and substance use among Mexican-heritage preadolescents: moderator effects of gender and tiime in the United States. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 2012;32(2):165–199. doi: 10.1177/0272431610384484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Levy RI, Hollan DW. Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. AltaMira Press; Lanham, MD: 1998. Person-centered interviewing and observation; pp. 333–364. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lindenberg CS, Gendrop SC, Nencioli M, Adames Z. Substance abuse among inner-city Hispanic women: exploring resiliency. Journal of Obstetrics. 1994;23(7):609–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1994.tb01927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lindenberg CS, Solorzano RM, Bear D, Strickland O, Galvis C, Pittman K. Reducing substance use and risky sexual behavior among young, low-income, Mexican-American women: comparison of two interventions. Applied Nursing Research: ANR. 2002;15(3):137–148. doi: 10.1053/apnr.2002.34141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lopez-Zetina J, Sanchez-Huesca R, Rios-Ellis B, Friis R, Torres I, Rogala B. Initiation to methamphetamine use in a binational sample of women at the US–Mexico border. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 2010;9(1):28–39. doi: 10.1080/15332640903539120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. MacLeod J. Ain’t no makin’ it: aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  46. Marsiglia FF, Kulis S, Hussaini SK, Nieri TA, Becerra D. Gender differences in the effect of linguistic acculturation on substance use among Mexican-origin youth in the southwest United States. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 2010;9(1):40–63. doi: 10.1080/15332640903539252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. McBride DC, Terry-McElrath Y, Chriqui J, O’Connor J, VanderWaal C, Mattson K. State methamphetamine precursor policies and changes in small toxic lab methamphetamine production. Journal of Drug Issues. 2011;41(2):253–282. [Google Scholar]
  48. Meade CS, Watt MH, Sikkema KJ, Deng LX, Ranby KW, Skinner D, Kalichmann SC. Methamphetamine use is associated with childhood sexual abuse and HIV sexual risk behaviors among patrons of alcohol-serving venues in Cape Town, South Africa. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2012;126(1–2):232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Miech RA, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2015: Volume I, secondary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of MIchigan; 2016. Retrieved, July 12, 2017, from http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-vol1_2016.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mitchell L, Bahl D, Jackson D, Taveras K, Young A. Final report: comprehensive economic development strategy (CEDS) for the Gateway Cities Region. Gateway Cities Council of Governments. University of Southern California Center for Economic Development, Sol Price School of Public Policy; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. Morgan P, Beck JE. The legacy and the paradox: hidden contexts of methamphetamine use in the United States. In: Klee H, editor. Amphetamine Misuse: International Perspectives in Current Trends. Reading, UK: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1999. pp. 135–162. [Google Scholar]
  52. Organista PB, Chun K, Marin G. Readings in ethnic psychology. Park Drive, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  53. Page JB, Singer M. Comprehending drug use: ethnographic research at the social margins. Newbrunkswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  54. Palacios WR, Urmann CF, Newel R, Hamilton N. Developing a sociological framework for dually diagnosed women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;17(1–2):91–102. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(98)00054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rawson RA, Gonzales R, Obert JL, McCann MJ, Brethen P. Methamphetamine use among treatment-seeking adolescents in Southern California: participant characteristics and treatment response. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;29(2):67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rawson RA, Washton A, Domier CP, Reiber C. Drugs and sexual effects: role of drug type and gender. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2002;22(2):103–108. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(01)00215-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods. 2003;15(1):85–109. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sanjek R. Fieldnotes: The makings of anthropology. Cornell University Press; Ithaca, NY: 1990. [Google Scholar]
  59. Semple SJ, Grant I, Patterson TL. Female methamphetamine users: social characteristics and sexual risk behavior. Women & Health. 2004;40(3):35–50. doi: 10.1300/j013v40n03_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shoptaw S, Reback CJ, Freese TE. Patient characteristics, HIV serostatus, and risk behaviors among gay and bisexual males seeking treatment for methamphetamine abuse and dependence in Los Angeles. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2002;21(1):91–105. doi: 10.1300/j069v21n01_08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Simpson JL, Grant KM, Daly PM, Kelley SG, Carlo G, Bevins RA. Psychological burden and gender differences in methamphetamine-dependent individuals in treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2016;48(4):261–9. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2016.1213470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Singer M. The face of social suffering: the life history of a street drug addict. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  63. State Sentencing: How Drug Sentencing Varies Across the U.S. DrugAbuse.com: Treatment Resources for Substance Abuse and Addiction Treatment. 2014 Retrieved, July 12, 2017, from: http://drugabuse.com/featured/state-sentencing-how-drug-sentencing-varies-across-the-us/
  64. Sterk CE. Fast lives: women who use crack cocaine. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  65. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  66. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Rockport, MD: Office of Applied Statistics, SAMHSA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. Retrieved, July 17, 2017, from: http://www.dpft.org/resources/NSDUHresults2008.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  67. SAMHSA & Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2002-2012 State Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  68. Svingen L, Dykstra RE, Simpson JL, Jaffe AE, Bevins RA, Carlo G, Grant KM. Associations between family history of substance use, childhood trauma, and age of first drug use in persons with methamphetamine dependence. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 2016;10(4):269–73. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Thompson PM, Hayashi KM, Simon SL, Geaga JA, Hong MS, Sui Y, Lee JY, Toga AW, Ling W, London ED. Structural abnormalities in the brains of human subjects who use methamphetamine. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24(26):6028–36. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0713-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. von Mayrhauser C, Brecht ML, Anglin MD. Use ecology and drug use motivations of methamphetamine users admitted to substance abuse treatment facilities in Los Angeles: An emerging profile. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2001;21(1):45–60. doi: 10.1300/j069v21n01_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Venkatesh SA. Gang leader for a day: a rogue sociologist takes to the streets. New York, NY: Penguin; Press: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  72. Vik RW, Ross T. Methamphetamine use among incarcerated women. Journal of Substance Use. 2003;8(2):69–77. [Google Scholar]
  73. von Mayrhauser C, Brecht ML, Anglin MD. Use ecology and drug use motivations of methamphetamine users admitted to substance abuse treatment facilities in Los Angeles: An emerging profile. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2001;21(1):45–60. doi: 10.1300/j069v21n01_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Widom CS, Marmorstein NR, White HR. Childhood victimization and illicit drug use in middle adulthood. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors. 2006;20(4):394–403. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wilsnack SC, Vogeltanz ND, Klassen AD, Harris TR. Childhood sexual abuse and women’s substance abuse: national survey findings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1997;58(3):264–271. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilson WJ. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and social policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wilson WJ. When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Vintage Books; 2011. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. [Google Scholar]
  78. (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.16.XI.7).United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report. 2016 Retrieved, July 12, 2017, from: http://www.unodc.org/doc/wdr2016/WORLD_DRUG_REPORT_2016_web.pdf.

RESOURCES