Treatment efficacy of Mycobacterium abscessus infections depends on bacterial genotype. Here, the relationship between genotype, as determined by sequence analysis, and antibiotic resistance phenotype was analyzed.
KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium abscessus, genotype, resistance
ABSTRACT
Treatment efficacy of Mycobacterium abscessus infections depends on bacterial genotype. Here, the relationship between genotype, as determined by sequence analysis, and antibiotic resistance phenotype was analyzed. The results demonstrate that M. abscessus genotype characteristics, including erm(41) sequevar and mutations of rrl and rrs, are predictive of clarithromycin and amikacin resistance.
INTRODUCTION
Mycobacterium abscessus, the most common rapidly growing mycobacterium (RGM) isolated from patients with chronic pulmonary infections, accounts for 80% of RGM isolates (1). Treatment of M. abscessus infections is complicated because of its innate multidrug resistance that can render even combination antibiotic treatment ineffective (2). Until recently, clarithromycin (CLA) and azithromycin (AZM) formed the cornerstone of antimicrobial chemotherapy of pulmonary M. abscessus infections (3). However, two molecular resistance mechanisms underlying CLA resistance were recently described. First, point mutations at position 2058/2059 of the 23S rRNA (rrl) gene confer acquired resistance to CLA (4). Second, an intact erm(41) T28 sequevar, characterized by a C to T substitution at position 28, confers inducible CLA resistance (4). Notably, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (M. massiliense) usually possesses a truncated, nonfunctional erm(41) gene due to a 274-bp deletion in the gene. In contrast, the M. abscessus subsp. abscessus erm(41) C28 sequevar, with a C at position 28 of erm(41), exhibits intrinsic susceptibility to CLA (5–7). Because of emerging CLA resistance, amikacin (AMK) has commonly been used as an alternative treatment. However, mutations of nucleotide 1408 of the rrs gene that have been correlated with AMK resistance have been observed (7). Consequently, because the effectiveness of therapeutic regimens for M. abscessus infections varies with bacterial genotype, this study was conducted to correlate M. abscessus genotype with antibiotic susceptibility.
A total of 385 isolates were collected from Guangzhou Chest Hospital in southern China and Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital in eastern China from January 2012 to December 2014. All isolates were subcultured on Löwenstein-Jensen medium followed by genomic DNA preparation, as previously reported (8). Isolates were then characterized further by using multilocus sequence analysis of various genes, including 16S rRNA, heat shock protein 65 (hsp65), the β-subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase (rpoB), and the 16S to 23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence. Meanwhile, MICs of 18 of the most common antibiotics used clinically to treat M. abscessus infections were determined by use of the recommended standard broth microdilution method (9). The MIC, defined here as the lowest concentration of antibiotic that inhibits visible growth of mycobacteria, was monitored on days 3, 7, and 14 of incubation. Susceptibility breakpoints for each antibiotic are shown in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Isolates susceptible to CLA on day 3 but resistant on day 14 were interpreted as exhibiting “inducible resistance” (6, 10, 11).
For each isolate, erm(41) sequevar and rrl and rrs gene sequences were analyzed and correlated with CLA and AMK profiles, as described previously (7, 11). Mutations of rrl and rrs sequences were compared with the published M. abscessus genome sequence (GenBank accession number NC_010397.1). Erm(41) sequence analysis was performed with ATCC 19977 (T28 sequevar, GenBank accession number FJ358483.1) and CR5701 (C28 sequevar, GenBank accession number HQ127366.1) as reference strains.
This study characterizes susceptibility profiles for the largest number of antibiotics to date for these clinical isolates, including resistance rates to macrolides and aminoglycosides (Table S1). AMK, CLA, and AZM were the three most effective agents against both M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (6/218, 2.8%; 14/218, 6.4%; 33/218, 15.1%, respectively) and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense isolates (7/163, 4.3%; 17/163, 10.4%; 21/163, 12.9%, respectively). Although the M. abscessus subsp. abscessus CLA resistance rate was higher on day 14 than on day 3 (84.9% versus 6.4%), the corresponding rate for subsp. massiliense barely changed (11.7% versus 10.4%). Meanwhile, similar overall trends were observed for AZM resistance (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Notably, the acquired CLA resistance rate of 8.1% (31/381) was lower than those reported in other studies in China (33.95%) (12) and South Korea (15.84%) (13), higher than those reported in Brazil (5.55%) (14) and the United States (2.51%), and similar to the rate in France (9.09%) (15). These variations may be the results of differences in isolates or in patient treatment histories among the various studies.
Few studies reported from China have correlated antibiotic susceptibility with M. abscessus genotype for such a large number of samples. Here, based on subspecies and erm(41) sequevar characterizations of all 385 isolates, 218 were identified as M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, of which 185 possessed the erm(41) T28 sequevar and 33 possessed the erm(41) C28 sequevar. Another 163 isolates were classified as subsp. massiliense, and 4 other isolates belonged to M. abscessus subsp. bolletii and were excluded from further analysis due to their low representation. CLA MIC values are presented in Table 1 with regard to subspecies, erm(41) sequevar, and time of incubation. A total of 336 CLA-sensitive and 31 CLA-resistant subsp. abscessus isolates were observed on day 3, whereas 204 CLA-resistant and 171 CLA-sensitive isolates were observed on day 14. Of CLA-sensitive isolates, most possessed the subsp. massiliense genotype (n = 139) or the erm(41) C28 (n = 30) sequevar. Notably, 2 CLA-sensitive isolates possessed erm(41) T28 sequevars, although the mechanism(s) underlying CLA sensitivity of these erm(41) T28 isolates are unknown.
TABLE 1.
Incubation time on the MIC values and resistant rate of CLA antibiotic for M. abscessus subtype, erm(41) sequevar
|
M. abscessus
subtype |
No. of isolates |
Incubation time (days) |
No. of isolates at CLA MIC (μg/ml) of: |
No. of resistant isolates (%) |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0625 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | ||||
| T28 | 185 | 3 | 19 | 31 | 27 | 28 | 32 | 27 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 11 (5.9) |
| 7 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 22 | 24 | 25 | 21 | 17 | 35 | 98 (53.0) | ||
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 19 | 32 | 115 | 182 (98.4) | ||
| C28 | 33 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 (9.1) |
| 7 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 (9.1) | ||
| 14 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 (9.1) | ||
| massiliense | 163 | 3 | 51 | 43 | 28 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 17 (10.4) |
| 7 | 43 | 37 | 24 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 17 (10.4) | ||
| 14 | 29 | 20 | 17 | 24 | 22 | 27 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 19 (11.7) | ||
| All subtypes | 381 | 3 | 80 | 83 | 61 | 42 | 39 | 31 | 14 | 31 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 31 (8.1) |
| 7 | 56 | 56 | 37 | 26 | 26 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 24 | 20 | 44 | 118 (11.5) | ||
| 14 | 35 | 27 | 24 | 29 | 26 | 30 | 6 | 5 | 21 | 49 | 129 | 204 (53.5) | ||
The relationship between CLA susceptibility and erm(41) sequence results and rrl mutations with CLA susceptibility was also analyzed on day 3 of CLA exposure by assessing 194 CLA-sensitive (MIC, ≤2 μg/ml) and 92 CLA-intermediate (MIC, ≥4 μg/ml) subsp. abscessus isolates, all of which lacked rrl 2058/2059 mutations before CLA exposure. Of these isolates, 59 possessed the erm(41) C28 sequevar and 227 possessed the erm(41) T28 sequevar. As shown in Table 2, of 14 isolates exhibiting acquired resistance isolates (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), 11 erm(41) T28 and 3 erm(41) C28 isolates were observed. Of the isolates with acquired resistance, 7 with the erm(41) T28 sequevar and all 3 with the erm(41) C28 sequevar also possessed an rrl 2058/2059 mutation. Of subsp. massiliense isolates, 142 were CLA-sensitive isolates, 4 were CLA-intermediate isolates, and 17 isolates exhibited acquired resistance. Of the latter, 10 possessed an rrl 2058/2059 mutation, and of these isolates, 5 harbored the A2058C mutation, 3 possessed the A2058G mutation, and 2 possessed the A2059C mutation. Because the remaining 7 resistant subsp. massiliense isolates exhibited no rrl 2058/2059 mutation, the underlying resistance mechanism was attributed to a change in 50S ribosomal subunit structure. Meanwhile, 3 erm(41) C28 isolates showed induced resistance to CLA, which was in agreement with results in previous studies showing that CLA resistance could be induced in isolates possessing the erm(41) C28 sequevar through rrl gene mutation after long-term exposure to high CLA concentrations.
TABLE 2.
Characterization of M. abscessus clinical isolates with phenotypic resistance to CLA and AMK
| Genotype | No. of isolates with rrl mutation: |
No. of isolates with rrl
mutation/day 3 resistant (%) |
No. of isolates with induced resistance (%) |
No. of isolates with rrs mutation A1408G |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2058C | A2058G | A2059C | Total | ||||
| erm(41) T28 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7/31 (22.6) | 171/174 (98.3) | 3 |
| erm(41) C28 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3/31 (9.7) | 0 (0) | 2 |
| M. massiliense | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 10/31 (32.3) | 3/174 (1.7) | 2 |
Regarding AMK susceptibility, MIC values, subspecies, and erm(41) sequevar are shown in Table 3, with MIC values ranging from 0.125 to 128 μg/ml. AMK resistance rates of isolates with erm(41) T28 and erm(41) C28 sequevar profiles were 2.7% and 3.0%, respectively, with no significant difference between erm(41) sequevars. Meanwhile, 69.2% (9/13) of isolates with MICs of ≥64 μg/ml possessed an A1408G rrs mutation; 7 of these isolates resistant to both CLA and AMK harbored rrl and rrs mutations. Notably, all AMK-resistant isolates were associated with tobramycin MICs of ≥8 μg/ml. Therefore, rrs mutations conferred cross-resistance between AMK and tobramycin, as previously reported (15).
TABLE 3.
Incubation time on MIC values and resistance rate of AMK antibiotic for M. abscessus subtype erm(41) sequevar
|
M. abscessus
subtype |
No. of isolates |
No. of isolates at AMK MIC (μg/ml) of: |
No. of resistant isolates (%) |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 | |||
| T28 | 185 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 18 | 59 | 63 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 5 (2.7) |
| C28 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 (3.0) |
| massiliense | 163 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 73 | 36 | 5 | 2 | 7 (4.3) |
| All subtypes | 381 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 20 | 12 | 26 | 88 | 150 | 49 | 8 | 5 | 13 (3.4) |
In conclusion, this study demonstrated an association between CLA drug resistance rate and M. abscessus genotype, with erm(41) sequevar and rrl and rrs genotypes being predictive of the resistance to CLA and AMK, respectively. This work should guide development of more effective treatment for M. abscessus infections.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Chen Jin (Shanghai Pulmonary Disease Hospital) and Tan Yaoju (Guangzhou Chest Hospital) for providing M. abscessus complex isolates. We also thank all the staff in the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory of China for their technical assistance.
This research was supported by a grant from Beijing Health System Top Level Health Technical Personnel Training Plan (20153079), the national basic research program of China (2014CB744403), and national science and technology major project 2014ZX100030002.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01523-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Griffith DE, Girard WM, Wallace RJ Jr. 1993. Clinical features of pulmonary disease caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria. An analysis of 154 patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 147:1271–1278. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jarand J, Levin A, Zhang L, Huitt G, Mitchell JD, Daley CL. 2011. Clinical and microbiologic outcomes in patients receiving treatment for Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease. Clin Infect Dis 52:565–571. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, von Reyn CF, Wallace RJ Jr, Winthrop K, ATS Mycobacterial Diseases Subcommittee, American Thoracic Society, Infectious Disease Society of America. 2007. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:367–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wallace RJ Jr, Meier A, Brown BA, Zhang Y, Sander P, Onyi GO, Böttger EC. 1996. Genetic basis for clarithromycin resistance among isolates of Mycobacterium chelonae and Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:1676–1681. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.7.1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim HY, Kim BJ, Kook Y, Yun YJ, Shin JH, Kim BJ, Kook YH. 2010. Mycobacterium massiliense is differentiated from Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium bolletii by erythromycin ribosome methyltransferase gene (erm) and clarithromycin susceptibility patterns. Microbiol Immunol 54:347–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nash KA, Brown-Elliott BA, Wallace RJ Jr. 2009. A novel gene, erm(41), confers inducible macrolide resistance to clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus but is absent from Mycobacterium chelonae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1367–1376. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01275-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maurer FP, Ruegger V, Ritter C, Bloemberg GV, Bottger EC. 2012. Acquisition of clarithromycin resistance mutations in the 23S rRNA gene of Mycobacterium abscessus in the presence of inducible erm(41). J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2606–2611. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Prammananan T, Sander P, Brown BA, Frischkorn K, Onyi GO, Zhang Y, Böttger EC, Wallace RJ Jr. 1998. A single 16S ribosomal RNA substitution is responsible for resistance to amikacin and other 2-deoxystreptamine aminoglycosides in Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium chelonae. J Infect Dis 177:1573–1581. doi: 10.1086/515328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mikaeili F, Kia EB, Sharbatkhori M, Sharifdini M, Jalalizand N, Heidari Z, Zarei Z, Stensvold CR, Mirhendi H. 2013. Comparison of six simple methods for extracting ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA from Toxocara and Toxascaris nematodes. Exp Parasitol 134:155–159. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2011. Susceptibility testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia, and other aerobic actinomycetes; approved standard—2nd ed. CLSI document M24-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bastian S, Veziris N, Roux AL, Brossier F, Gaillard JL, Jarlier V, Cambau E. 2011. Assessment of clarithromycin susceptibility in strains belonging to the Mycobacterium abscessus group by erm(41) and rrl sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:775–781. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00861-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li B, Yang S, Chu H, Zhang Z, Liu W, Luo L, Ma W, Xu X. 2017. Relationship between antibiotic susceptibility and genotype in Mycobacterium abscessus clinical isolates. Front Microbiol 8:1739. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee SH, Yoo HK, Kim SH, Koh WJ, Kim CK, Park YK, Kim HJ. 2014. The drug resistance profile of Mycobacterium abscessus group strains from Korea. Ann Lab Med 34:31–37. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Garcia de Carvalho NF, Sato DN, Pavan FR, Ferrazoli L, Chimara E. 2016. Resazurin microtiter assay for clarithromycin susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus group. J Clin Lab Anal 30:751–755. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mougari F, Amarsy R, Veziris N, Bastian S, Brossier F, Bercot B, Raskine L, Cambau E. 2016. Standardized interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility testing and resistance genotyping for Mycobacterium abscessus with regard to subspecies and erm41 sequevar. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:2208–2212. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
