Correction: Differential expression of pathogenic genes of Entamoeba histolytica vs E. dispar in a model of infection using human liver tissue explants

Table 4 is incorrect. Please see the correct Table 4 here.

Table 4. Expression levels of genes linked to mechanisms of pathogenesis in the ex vivo infection model, selected by bibliographic revision.

CLAVE	Time (h)	RQ ± SD		p value
		E. histolytica	E. dispar
Ehoxired	1	6049 ± 1527	3822 ± 1231	0.072
	3	2320 ± 127.3	820.5 ± 269	0.045
	24	592.2 ± 125	75 ± 25	0.033
	48	21 ± 12.5	0.8 ± 0.23	0.025
Ehaig-1	1	80.3 ± 32.3	16.3 ± 2.6	0.04
	3	361.1 ± 72.4	0.64 ± 0.4	0.03
	24	4154. 4 ± 201	0.21 ± 0.1	0.02
	48	3.4 ± 1.2	0.96 ± 0.4	0.017
Eh hsp-20kDa	1	957.2 ± 191	27.4 ± 6.6	0.036
	3	1236.8 ± 327	39.2 ± 6.1	0.023
	24	29.3 ± 5.6	9.5 ± 6.5	0.03
	48	35.8 ± 9.1	0.05 ± 0.0006	0.04
Ehpeptidase	1	2.1 ± 0.6	0.044 ± 0.014	0.015
	3	8.25 ± 1.7	0.66 ± 0.25	0.026
	24	2.7± 1.9	0.43 ± 0.12	0.045
	48	2.23 ± 0.23	0.05 ± 0.03	0.04
Eh20kDa	1	0.37 ± 0.1	0.66 ± 0.4	0.93
	3	70.7 ± 28	0.3 ± 0.2	0.042
	24	4.1 ± 0.33	0.71 ± 0.4	0.015
	48	2.3 ± 0.3	0.55 ± 0.4	0.14
Eh dovasa	1	0.41 ± 0.03	0.9 ± 05	0.18
	3	2.1 ± 0.65	0.51 ± 0.2	0.032
	24	0.9 ± 0.3	0.15 ± 0.01	0.046
	48	0.9 ± 0.14	0.12 ± 0.043	0.042
Ehthiored	1	0.31 ± 0.023	0.31 ± 0.023	0.083
	3	0.22 ± 0.1	0.13 ± 0.05	0.067
	24	0.5 ± 0.03	0.2 ± 0.1	0.042
	48	0.7 ± 0.14	0.2 ± 0.1	0.03
Ehhypo1	1	69 ± 32	0.23 ± 0.1	0.032
	3	44.4 ± 1.3	0.9 ± 0.2	0.03
	24	61.4 ± 25	0.53 ± 0.14	0.02
	48	40 ± 15.4	0.5 ± 0.1	0.02
Ehhypo3	1	1.02 ± 0.4	1.7 ± 0.001	0.125
	3	0.21 ± 0.1	13.2 ± 4.7	0.031
	24	0.98 ± 0.7	7.4 ± 0.01	0.046
	48	0.22 ± 0.01	0.76 ± 0.5	0.062
Ehhypo4	1	34.82± 0.4	5.4 ± 2.3	0.017
	3	8.73 ± 2.5	6.2 ± 1	0.82
	24	18.3 ± 6.1	17.1 ± 5	0.062
	48	15.1 ± 6	0.53 ± 0.3	0.032
Ehhypo5	1	191.6 ±71.5	914.9 ± 95.5	0.15
	3	1053 ± 33.6	3.6 ± 2.2	0.017
	24	3.9 ±1.3	0.27 ± 0.1	0.033
	48	0.75 ± 0.31	0 .63 ± 0.4	0.072
Ehhypo6	1	73.01 ± 32	0.01 ± 0.001	0.034
	3	145.1 ± 63	0.034 ± 0.014	0.021
	24	2.6 ± 0.7	0.02 ± 0.005	0.045
	48	1.71 ± 0.7	0.01 ± 0.01	0.043
Ehhypo7	1	0.00011 ± 0.00006	0.0083 ± 0.0006	0.45
	3	3.7 ± 0.85	0.48 ± 0.05	0.29
	24	286.1 ± 57.1	0.87 ± 0.45	0.017
	48	2.1 ± 0.45	0.15 ± 0.05	0.124
Ehypo8	1	6.4 ± 2.6	3.2 ± 0.5	0.083
	3	13.6 ± 0.43	4.8 ± 1.5	0.02
	24	2.83 ± 0.5	1.3 ± 0.23	0.31
	48	0.95 ± 0.3	0.31 ± 0.02	0.073
Ehhypo9	1	3.1 ± 1.2	8.13 ± 0.95	0.02
	3	0.56 ± 0.29	0.56 ± 0.4	0.03
	24	129.4 ± 27.6	0.18 ± 0.1	0.025
	48	2.2 ± 1.1	0.44 ± 0.04	0.04
Ehhypo10	1	0.74 ± 0.3	0.05 ± 0.013	0.097
	3	0.012 ± 0.006	0.045 ± 0.004	0.94
	24	0.041 ± 0.003	0.01 ± 0.004	0.31
	48	0.05 ± 0.01	0.00023 ± 0.0001	0.88

After human PCLS were ex vivo infected with E. histolytica or E. dispar trophozoites for different time spans (1, 3, 24 and 48 h), the relative quantification (RQ) was determined (by qPCR) for the mRNA of some genes obtained by a bibliographic analysis. (RQ) relative quantification, (SD) standard deviation, data expressed as the mean of 5 separate assays. Shown the RQ of some genes which codified to hypothetical proteins, the cardinal number added is only for personal identification. p value calculated by Student t-test.