Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) is an emerging MRSA lineage rapidly evolving in the community. In this report, we present the draft genome sequences of nine LA-MRSA strains.
ABSTRACT
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) is an emerging MRSA lineage rapidly evolving in the community. In this report, we present the draft genome sequences of nine LA-MRSA strains. These strains were isolated from meat and a human nasal swab sample and belong to one unique spa type (t899), but to three different sequence types, ST398, ST9, and ST4034.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) is the largest MRSA pool in humans outside the hospital setting, with livestock as a primary reservoir (1, 2). This lineage is predominantly represented by clonal complex 398 (CC398), but it also comprises other clonal complexes, including CC9 and CC5 (2 – 4).
Staphylococcus aureus protein A (spa) typing has a remarkable predictive power over clonal relatedness (5, 6). In most instances, a single spa type is strictly associated with a specific multilocus sequence type (MLST). However, some exceptions do exist, such as spa type t899, which is reported in multiple sequence types, namely, ST398 and ST9. In this report, we present the draft genome sequences of nine LA-MRSA strains, all belonging to spa type t899 but clustering in three different sequence types, ST398 (3), ST9 (5), and ST4034 (1) (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus spa type t899 isolates
| Isolate IDa | Isolate source | Sample originb | Year of isolation | STc | No. of raw reads | Genome coverage (×) | No. of contigs | N50 (bp)d | GC content (%)d | Genome size (bp) | GenBank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAV0154 | Pork | CZ | 2013 | 4034 | 772,052 | 64.34 | 178 | 39,112 | 32.91 | 2,781,027 | QYAY00000000 |
| SAV0987 | Human | CZ | 2017 | 398 | 1,109,012 | 92.42 | 196 | 37,830 | 32.79 | 2,922,579 | QYAX00000000 |
| SAV1035 | Poultry meat | PO | 2017 | 9 | 1,062,670 | 88.56 | 123 | 85,312 | 32.71 | 2,783,450 | QYAW00000000 |
| SAV1109 | Poultry meat | PO | 2017 | 398 | 699,934 | 58.33 | 303 | 20,030 | 32.82 | 2,857,636 | QYAV00000000 |
| SAV1146 | Poultry meat | DE | 2017 | 398 | 675,512 | 56.29 | 131 | 55,180 | 32.85 | 2,896,873 | QYAU00000000 |
| SAV1149 | Poultry meat | DE | 2017 | 9 | 893,060 | 74.42 | 277 | 21,660 | 32.79 | 2,749,354 | QYAT00000000 |
| SAV1150 | Poultry meat | DE | 2017 | 9 | 808,170 | 67.35 | 99 | 78,511 | 32.75 | 2,756,154 | QYAS00000000 |
| SAV1158 | Poultry meat | DE | 2017 | 9 | 1,231,020 | 102.58 | 64 | 135,732 | 32.73 | 2,764,912 | QYAR00000000 |
| SAV1228 | Pork | CZ | 2017 | 9 | 2,321,580 | 193.47 | 116 | 80,797 | 32.71 | 2,730,307 | QYAQ00000000 |
aID, identification.
bCZ, Czech Republic; DE, Germany; PO, Poland.
cST, sequence type.
dN50 value and GC percentage were calculated based on contigs of ≥500 bp.
Isolates were obtained from meat samples collected in retail markets and from a nasal swab sample from a dialysis patient that was taken during hospital screening in the Czech Republic. The meat from which the samples were drawn was produced in different countries and sold in the Czech Republic. The samples were primarily enriched in buffered peptone water and cultured on Baird-Parker agar. Presumptive S. aureus colonies were transferred to blood agar and confirmed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (7). All MRSA isolates were identified using PCR detection of the S. aureus-specific fragment SA442 and the mecA gene (8). MLST (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST) (9) and spa typing (https://www.spaserver.ridom.de) (10) were performed prior to the whole-genome sequence run.
Total genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) from pure culture colonies cultivated on Columbia sheep blood agar (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Temse, Belgium). Whole-genome sequencing was performed with a MiSeq sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Library preparation was performed with the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina). The libraries were then sequenced using a 250-bp paired-end protocol (MiSeq reagent kit v.3, Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data analysis was performed using an in-house instance of the Galaxy workflow management system (11). Sequencing yielded a total of 9,573,010 reads with 35- to 251-bp read lengths. Raw reads were quality checked with FastQC v.0.65, and low-quality reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v.0.36.4 (12). Subsequently, assemblies were generated using the SPAdes v.1.3.1 algorithm (13). Contigs ≥200 bp long were retained in the assembly. The genome sizes ranged from 2,730,307 to 2,922,579 bp. The average GC content and the N50 value were 32.8% and 61,574 bp, respectively. Final assemblies consisted of 64 to 303 contigs with an average coverage of 88.64× (Table 1). Annotation was carried out using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/) (14).
Data availability.
The genome sequences reported here have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers QYAQ00000000 to QYAY00000000. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, QYAQ01000000 to QYAY01000000 (Table 1). Raw sequences are available under the SRA study accession number SRP161670.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the service Transversal Activities in Applied Genomics from Sciensano for the paired-end sequencing reactions and for the development and maintenance of the in-house instance of the Galaxy workflow management system.
This study was supported by projects of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, NAZV KUS QJ1510216, and project LO1218 from MEYS of the Czech Republic under the NPU I program. Funding sources did not affect the design of this study, data collection, data analysis, decisions on publication, or preparation of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hau SJ, Bayles DO, Alt DP, Frana TS, Nicholson TL. 2017. Complete genome sequence of a livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 5 isolate from the United States. Genome Announc 5:e00791-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00791-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lekkerkerk WS, Van Wamel WJ, Snijders SV, Willems RJ, van Duijkeren E, Broens EM, Wagenaar JA, Lindsay JA, Vos MC. 2015. What is the origin of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 isolates from humans without livestock contact? An epidemiological and genetic analysis. J Clin Microbiol 53:1836–1841. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02702-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.European Food Safety Authority. 2009. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008. Part A: MRSA prevalence estimates. EFSA J 7:1376. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Graveland H, Duim B, Van Duijkeren E, Heederik D, Wagenaar JA. 2011. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals and humans. Int J Med Microbiol 301:630–634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Faria NA, Carrico JA, Oliveira DC, Ramirez M, de Lencastre H. 2008. Analysis of typing methods for epidemiological surveillance of both methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol 46:136–144. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01684-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Satta G, Ling CL, Cunningham ES, McHugh TD, Hopkins S. 2013. Utility and limitations of Spa-typing in understanding the epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia isolates in a single university hospital. BMC Res Notes 6:398. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Szabados F, Woloszyn J, Richter C, Kaase M, Gatermann S. 2010. Identification of molecularly defined Staphylococcus aureus strains using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry and the Biotyper 2.0 database. J Med Microbiol 59:787–790. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.016733-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. 2002. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2155–2161. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2155-2161.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38:1008–1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Friedrich AW, Witte W, Lencastre HD, Hryniewicz W, Scheres J, Westh H. 2008. A European laboratory network for sequence-based typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a communication platform between human and veterinary medicine: an update on SeqNet.org. Euro Surveill 13:18862. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, The Galaxy Team . 2010. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol 11:R86. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Angiuoli SV, Gussman A, Klimke W, Cochrane G, Field D, Garrity GM, Kodira CD, Kyrpides N, Madupu R, Markowitz V, Tatusova T, Thomson N, White O. 2008. Toward an online repository of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for (meta) genomic annotation. OMICS 12:137–141. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequences reported here have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers QYAQ00000000 to QYAY00000000. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, QYAQ01000000 to QYAY01000000 (Table 1). Raw sequences are available under the SRA study accession number SRP161670.
