Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2019 Jan 9;85(2):e02129-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02129-18

Manganese Oxide Biomineralization Provides Protection against Nitrite Toxicity in a Cell-Density-Dependent Manner

Christian Zerfaß a,b, Joseph A Christie-Oleza a,b, Orkun S Soyer a,b,
Editor: Emma R Masterc
PMCID: PMC6328764  PMID: 30413475

We present here a direct fitness benefit (i.e., growth advantage) for manganese oxide biomineralization activity in Roseobacter sp. strain AzwK-3b, a model organism used to study this process. We find that strain AzwK-3b in a laboratory culture experiment is growth inhibited by nitrite in manganese-free cultures, while the inhibition is considerably relieved by manganese supplementation and manganese oxide (MnOX) formation. We show that biogenic MnOX interacts directly with nitrite and possibly with reactive oxygen species and find that its beneficial effects are established through formation of dispersed MnOX granules in a manner dependent on the population size. These experiments raise the possibility that manganese biomineralization could confer protection against nitrite toxicity to a population of cells. They open up new avenues of interrogating this process in other species and provide possible routes to their biotechnological applications, including in metal recovery, biomaterials production, and synthetic community engineering.

KEYWORDS: Roseobacter, biomineralization, metal recovery, microbial ecology, reactive oxygen species, respiration

ABSTRACT

Manganese biomineralization is a widespread process among bacteria and fungi. To date, there is no conclusive experimental evidence for how and if this process impacts microbial fitness in the environment. Here, we show how a model organism for manganese oxidation is growth inhibited by nitrite, and that this inhibition is mitigated in the presence of manganese. We show that such manganese-mediated mitigation of nitrite inhibition is dependent on the culture inoculum size, and that manganese oxide (MnOX) forms granular precipitates in the culture, rather than sheaths around individual cells. We provide evidence that MnOX protection involves both its ability to catalyze nitrite oxidation into (nontoxic) nitrate under physiological conditions and its potential role in influencing processes involving reactive oxygen species (ROS). Taken together, these results demonstrate improved microbial fitness through MnOX deposition in an ecological setting, i.e., mitigation of nitrite toxicity, and point to a key role of MnOX in handling stresses arising from ROS.

IMPORTANCE We present here a direct fitness benefit (i.e., growth advantage) for manganese oxide biomineralization activity in Roseobacter sp. strain AzwK-3b, a model organism used to study this process. We find that strain AzwK-3b in a laboratory culture experiment is growth inhibited by nitrite in manganese-free cultures, while the inhibition is considerably relieved by manganese supplementation and manganese oxide (MnOX) formation. We show that biogenic MnOX interacts directly with nitrite and possibly with reactive oxygen species and find that its beneficial effects are established through formation of dispersed MnOX granules in a manner dependent on the population size. These experiments raise the possibility that manganese biomineralization could confer protection against nitrite toxicity to a population of cells. They open up new avenues of interrogating this process in other species and provide possible routes to their biotechnological applications, including in metal recovery, biomaterials production, and synthetic community engineering.

INTRODUCTION

A large variety of biominerals based on different cations (e.g., iron, manganese, calcium) and anions (e.g., carbonates, oxides, phosphates) are deposited by different microorganisms (1). One of these is manganese oxide (25), which is deposited by the oxidation of soluble MnII. Microbial MnII oxidation received attention with the discovery of polymetallic, manganese-rich, biogenic deep-sea nodules, which have been shown to harbor both manganese-oxidizing and manganese-reducing organisms (6). While it is suggested that such nodules could potentially be mined for rare earth elements, and the associated metal-active organisms used in biotechnology of metal recovery (2, 3, 58), it remains unclear in many cases why organisms carry out such metal oxidizing and reducing activities. In the case of metal-reducing organisms, it has been shown that metabolic energy can be gained under anaerobic conditions from using metal oxides (i.e., manganese, iron, or others) as alternative terminal electron acceptors (911). Some metals can be oxidized by microbes and act as an inorganic energy source for so-called chemolithotrophic growth, as in the case of iron lithotrophy (12). While it has been suggested that manganese oxidation can also be used as a chemolithotrophic source of energy (2), little experimental evidence has been found. In most cases studied, Mn oxidation is not used as a lithotrophic source of energy and, hence, evolutionary advantages of this process are not well understood (2, 7, 8). Two running hypotheses for nonlithotrophic manganese oxidation are that the resulting manganese oxides (MnOX) can (i) increase accessibility of organic nutrients or (ii) protect microbes from potentially toxic compounds and superoxide stress (13, 14). The validity of the former hypothesis remains to be tested conclusively. MnOX has been shown to react with complex organic (i.e., humic) substances (15), but it is not clear if the resulting organic products from such reactions are utilized by microbes. It has been suggested that certain fungi employ ligand-stabilized MnIII to oxidize recalcitrant litter (16), but these studies were not performed with single (defined) carbon/energy sources. The latter hypothesis regarding the protective potential of MnOX remains unproven to date for metal toxicity (2, 7). It was shown that MnOX can mediate a protection against superoxides in Pseudomonas species (14), but it is not clear how significant this benefit is, given that these and other Mn-oxidizing species also possess specific superoxide-scavenging enzymes, such as catalases and superoxide dismutases (1719). It has been suggested that MnOX precipitates can act as strong sorbents of heavy metals, hence mitigating the toxic effects of such metals on microorganisms, but this has yet to be tested in a biological context (2). Taken together, the biological significance of microbial manganese oxidation remains largely a paradox, as no clear benefits have been demonstrated.

In recent years, Roseobacter sp. strain AzwK-3b emerged as a model organism to study the generation of MnOX (20). AzwK-3b is a bacterium that shows significant manganese-oxidizing activity in vitro when grown in a complex (rich) K medium (20) and defined (acetate-fed) J medium (21). This activity was shown to be mediated by a secreted exoenzyme—a heme-type oxidase—that can catalyze the in vitro generation of superoxides from NADH and oxygen (22) (this and later reactions are shown in Fig. 1), demonstrating the use of biological reductive energy equivalents. The resulting superoxide can in turn facilitate the MnII oxidation into MnIII, which undergoes further disproportionation to result in MnO2 (2226) or, more specifically, mixed-valence-state MnOX. While NADH was a suitable electron donor for the in vitro superoxide production by heme peroxidase, the natural reducing agent and the way it is delivered are not known. It has been suggested that the heme peroxidase might be loosely membrane bound (27), which would mean that electrons could be shuttled from cytoplasmic reductive metabolites to the heme peroxidase, e.g., via membrane proteins, although this would imply that the natural site of superoxide production (and subsequent manganese oxidation) would be in the immediate proximity of the cell. Since heme peroxidases are also found in culture supernatants (22), an extracellular reaction would require that electron donor metabolites are also secreted, which would imply a considerable investment for AzwK-3b. Thus, these mechanistic findings strongly suggest that AzwK-3b is making a significant metabolic investment into production of MnOX in the form of secreted enzymes and possibly also reductive energy-donating metabolites. Furthermore, strain AzwK-3b’s cellular and excreted proteome is shown to be different when grown in the presence or absence of Mn, while it is notable that the heme peroxidase described above was not found to be differentially expressed (28). It is currently not clear how and if the metabolically costly process of extracellular Mn oxidation benefits individual cells and how it could have been maintained over evolutionary time scales.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Biological oxidation of manganese via superoxide and nitrite oxidation by the product manganese oxide. These reactions are taken from references 24 (manganese oxidation) and 47 (nitrite oxidation). Note that only representative reactions are presented. For instance, the text refers to a mixed oxide (MnOX), while this reaction scheme simplifies to MnO2. The cellular reductant (cell. reductant) which serves as electron donor for superoxide production is not unambiguously identified.

In an attempt to better understand any ecologically relevant “fitness” impacts of manganese oxidation, we have studied the physiology of Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b in more detail. While we did not find any significant difference in growth rate between manganese-free and manganese-supplemented media, we found that the manganese-oxidizing activity of Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b supports growth of the bacterium at nitrite concentrations that fully prevent growth in a manganese-free culture. MnOX formed as granules dispersed among cells, and its nitrite-inhibition mitigation effects showed a significant population size effect, suggesting a “community commodity” nature of this compound. Mechanistically, we show that biogenic MnOX was able to catalyze nitrite oxidation into nitrate under physiological conditions (according to reaction 4 in Fig. 1) and that the mitigation of nitrite inhibition was also affected by NADH. These results suggest that the ability of MnOX to alleviate nitrite toxicity relates to providing catalytic scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the environment, whose effect can be leveraged by nitrite.

RESULTS

To study the role of manganese oxidation in microbial fitness we have focused here on Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b, which has recently emerged as a model organism for this process (2, 8). We refer to the oxidation product as MnOX, since biogenic manganese oxides are usually precipitates with mixed manganese oxidation states, particularly MnII, MnIII, and MnIV (2, 29). AzwK-3b has been shown to oxidize manganese to MnOX by means of an exoenzyme and reductive energy (e.g., NADH in vitro) and potentially involving an elaborate redox reaction path (2226). We first attempted to identify fully defined growth conditions for this bacterium, which has been studied to date in complex and lean K media (20), both of which contained undefined complex ingredients, such as peptone or vitamin mixtures and yeast extract (20, 30) or standard vitamin supplements (21). Through systematic analysis of medium composition, we have created a minimal defined medium that supports AzwK-3b growth (from now on referred to as modified artificial seawater medium, ASWm) (Table 1) and that has revealed the requirement for five specific vitamin supplements for growth (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Given this defined culture medium, we were then able to interrogate the impact of manganese on the growth of AzwK-3b.

TABLE 1.

Detailed composition of the defined AzwK-3b growth medium, ASWma

Compound Concn
Base salts (1× AzwK-3b medium)
    Sodium chloride (NaCl) (mM) 200
    Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) (mM) 8.82
    Potassium chloride (KCl) (mM) 6.71
    Di-potassium hydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) (μM) 131
    Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) (mM) 14.2
    Magnesium chloride (MgCl2) (mM) 9.84
    Calcium chloride (CaCl2) (mM) 3
    Tris (mM) 1.1
pH of the medium 8
Trace metal solution (1,000×)
    Copper chloride (CuCl2) (μM) 32
    Zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) (μM) 765
    Cobalt chloride (CoCl2) (μM) 169
    Sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4) (mM) 1.65
    Boric acid (H3BO3) (mM) 46.3
    Nickel chloride (NiCl2) (mM) 4.2
    Sodium tungstate (Na2WoO4) (μM) 243
    Sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) (μM) 228
Additional (1,000×) supplement solutions
    Iron chloride (FeCl3; prepared in 10 mM HCl, balanced with extra
10 mM NaOH solution) (mM)
10.4
    EDTA (pH 8.0; sodium salt) (mM) 1.34
    Manganese chloride (MnCl2, only added where desired) (mM) 200
Vitamin supplement (1,000×)
    Biotin (μM) 82
    Pyridoxine hydrochloride (μM) 484
    Thiamine hydrochloride (μM) 148
    Riboflavin (μM) 133
    Nicotinic acid (μM) 406
a

The medium was developed starting from artificial seawater (ASW) (35), with extra trace metals taken from references 9 and 94 and a 5-vitamin solution identified starting from Wolfe’s vitamin mixture (95).

Manganese oxidation has negligible impact on growth rate.

Despite potentially significant costs associated with exoenzyme secretion and the investment of reductive energy equivalents for superoxide generation, we did not find any substantial difference in growth rates and steady-state population sizes with increasing MnII concentration for cultures grown with 25 mM acetate (Fig. 2). A slightly lower growth rate at the highest manganese concentration (500 μM) was observed, but it was difficult to ascertain this effect, as both MnOX particles and cells coaggregating with those particles could have interfered with the absorbance measurements. The slightly reduced growth rate at 200 μM MnIICl2 is in line with results of an earlier report on AzwK-3b, where 100 μM MnII was found to decrease the growth rate in (complex) K medium (20). Other manganese-oxidizing bacteria, such as Erythrobacter sp. strain SD-21 (31, 32) and a marine Bacillus strain (33), were reported to grow better when cultured with a MnII supplement. In light of these different findings and possible difficulties with growth rate measurements in the presence of manganese precipitation, we cannot be fully conclusive about the growth effects associated with manganese oxidation based on the presented results; however, they are suggestive of low or no impact on growth rate.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Effect of MnII on the growth of Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b in the defined growth medium (Table 1). The concentrations of manganese were 0 μM (black), 200 μM (red), and 500 μM (dark green), with no growth (zero line) in the respective noninoculated controls (blue, magenta, and light blue). Cultures were grown in a 96-well plate (200-μl culture), with shaking, and absorbance measurements were taken every 10 min (see Materials and Methods).

Manganese oxidation mitigates nitrite growth inhibition.

With growth effects being limited, a possible alternative explanation for a positive role of manganese oxidation is a protective effect against inhibitors or stresses (2, 13). Here, we evaluated this hypothesis for nitrite. Nitrite is commonly found in the environment, where it results from the reduction of nitrate, a key terminal electron acceptor utilized by many microbes (34). We found that nitrite inhibited the growth of AzwK-3b in manganese-free cultures, where already as low as 0.25 mM nitrite prevented growth of AzwK-3b (Fig. 3A). To rule out a salinity effect, different concentrations of sodium chloride were tested (200 mM [default in ASWm] to 428 mM NaCl [default in original ASW medium (35)]), and AzwK-3b grew in all tested conditions (Fig. S2).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Growth of Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b cultures in the defined growth medium supplemented with sodium nitrite. Media were prepared without (A) or with (B) 200 μM manganese chloride (MnIICl2). Nitrite concentrations were 0 mM (black), 0.25 mM (red), 0.5 mM (green), 1 mM (dark blue), and 2.5 mM (light blue). All conditions were tested in triplicate, and the growth curves represent averages and their standard deviations (see Materials and Methods).

With the addition of 200 μM MnII, we found that AzwK-3b is able to grow in the presence of up to 1 mM nitrite (Fig. 3B). Increasing the nitrite concentration still affected both the growth rate and maximal culture density (based on A600), but this effect was much lower than that in the manganese-free cultures (Fig. 3). To overcome any potential confounding effects of MnOX precipitation on spectroscopic culture density measurements, we additionally quantified acetate consumption as a proxy for growth, using ion chromatography. As expected, manganese-free cultures with 0.25 mM (or higher) nitrite concentrations showed only insignificant decreases in acetate, while the MnII-supplemented cultures showed acetate consumption in accordance with the A600 measurements (see Fig. S3). These findings confirm that MnII supplementation allows AzwK-3b to withstand nitrite inhibition.

Nitrite inhibition relief is a community function that depends on culture size and that is mediated by dispersed, granular MnOX precipitates.

It has been shown that MnOX precipitation by AzwK-3b is mediated by secreted exoenzymes (22). It is not known, however, whether the process of MnOX precipitation occurs primarily on individual cell surfaces, or whether it is a population-level process, with the secreted enzymes conferring the notion of a community commodity (3639). We hypothesized that these two different scenarios could be distinguished by analyzing population size effects on MnOX-mediated mitigation of nitrite inhibition. In particular, we designed an experiment in which cultures pregrown without MnII are subsequently subcultured into medium with MnII and nitrite, using different inoculum sizes. We argue that, in the case of MnOX-based protection being a process confined to individual cells, there should be no effect of inoculation size.

We found that MnOX-based protection against nitrite inhibition was dependent on inoculum size (Fig. 4). A preculture was grown without nitrite and manganese and, from this, inocula were generated at two different time points within the first third of the exponential phase (labeled IT1 and IT2 in Fig. S4). When these inocula were subjected to nitrite in the main culture, the earlier, low-density inoculum, IT1, was inhibited by nitrite regardless of the presence or absence of MnII (Fig. 4A and B), while manganese-mediated mitigation of nitrite inhibition was clearly evident for the larger, high-density inoculum, IT2 (Fig. 4C and D). In the IT1 cultures, half of the acetate was unused at 0.25 mM nitrite, and, gradually, more acetate resided with increasing nitrite concentration (Fig. S5). In the IT2 cultures with MnII supplementation, however, acetate was completely removed at all nitrite levels below 2.5 mM, and only 25% to 50% of acetate remained at 5 to 10 mM nitrite. In the control samples (no inoculation) there was no change in acetate concentration, ruling out any cross-activity with manganese.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Larger AzwK-3b inocula are less inhibited by nitrite. A preculture without manganese or nitrite was grown and sampled in the exponential growth phase (Fig. S4) to prepare inocula from a very early time point in the exponential phase (IT1, panels A and B) and from a later time point (IT2, panels C and D; both sampled in the first third of the exponential phase). These inocula were diluted 1:1 with fresh medium and tested for growth at different nitrite concentrations (see below for color code) without (A, C) or with (B, D) 200 μM MnIICl2 supplement. The nitrite concentrations were as follows: black, control/no nitrite; red, 0.25 mM nitrite; green, 0.5 mM nitrite; blue, 1 mM nitrite; yellow, 2 mM nitrite; magenta, 5 mM nitrite; light blue, 7.5 mM nitrite; and dark red, 10 mM nitrite. Growth curves show the averages and standard deviations over a triplicate analysis (see Materials and Methods).

Rather than a true population size effect, these observed inoculum effects could be due to cells from the Mn-free, early-phase precultures not having “turned on” expression of exoenzymes required for MnOX precipitation. To rule out this possibility, we performed an additional experiment, where the precultures were already grown with 200 μM MnII. Using this preadapted culture, inocula were again prepared by sampling at different growth time points (IT1 to IT4 in Fig. S6A). Cultures grown from these different inocula displayed much weaker inhibition by increasing nitrite concentrations up to 10 mM (Fig. S6B) and were able to consume acetate (Fig. S6C), yet there were still inoculum size effects on overcoming nitrite inhibition (Fig. 5, green). Interestingly, the extent of this effect seems similar to that observed with inocula originating from precultures grown without MnII but supplied with MnII after subculturing into nitrite-containing medium (Fig. 5, blue). In particular, at 5 and 10 mM nitrite, maximum growth rate (and final density) data from these two treatments can all be fitted on to a single (sigmoidal) curve that describes the relation between these data and initial inoculum density (Fig. 5, black line). This shows that the presence of MnII in the preculture does not impact the dynamics of the process but rather allows the main-culture populations to grow to a higher density under a given nitrite level. In the absence of MnII in both precultures and main cultures, a much denser inoculum was required to achieve growth at a given nitrite level, and even then, both growth rate and final growth density were lower than those measured in the presence of MnII. Under this condition, there was still a density dependence of the nitrite effect.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Inoculum size effect on MnOX-mediated mitigation of nitrite inhibition. Data from different AzwK-3b growth experiments of similar type (large inocula; see Materials and Methods) were analyzed for the maximum A600 (bottom row) and growth rate (top row) by fitting the growth curves. Each condition was done in three technical replicates (note that error bars are not visible in some cases due to only small differences). Nitrite concentrations of the main cultures are indicated as headings of the figure columns. The x axes show the calculated A600 values of the initial cultures after diluting them 1:1 from the precultures, while the y axes show the maximum A600 and maximum growth rate values as calculated with the Gompertz model (91, 92) (see Materials and Methods). The colors represent different conditions, as follows: red, neither preculture nor main culture contained manganese; blue, preculture without and main culture with manganese; and green, both preculture and main culture with manganese. The black curve is a sigmoidal fit (logistic model) from the R package Grofit (91), for the results of the combined blue and green data set, where the nitrite-exposed main cultures all contained manganese.

These results suggest that MnOX precipitation is a community-level function. To further elaborate on this result, we explored the microstructure of the AzwK-3b cultures in the presence of MnII. Analysis of cultures using electron microscopy revealed MnOX precipitates as granules dispersed within the culture and attaching to clusters of cells, rather than forming sheaths around individual cells (as seen in some other cases of metal oxide precipitations [40]) (Fig. 6, left). Employing electron-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, we confirmed that these granular structures contained manganese, while no manganese was detected in locations with cells only (i.e., without granular structures; Fig. 6, right).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Scanning transmission electron micrograph (left figure, high-angle annular dark field) of (granular) manganese-containing precipitate (center) surrounded by AzwK-3b cells, and associated energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic analysis (right figure) in this location. Only the energy range containing the manganese-specific X-ray energies at 5.90 keV (KαI) and 6.49 keV (KβI) is shown, and the manganese transitions are indicated by vertical gray dashed lines.

MnOX-mediated nitrite protection involves redox reactions and oxygen radicals.

After establishing the community-level functionality of biogenic MnOX as a protective agent against nitrite, we next wanted to evaluate the mechanistic basis of this function in the context of nitrite toxicity. While multiple mechanisms of nitrite toxicity have been reported (41, 42), two key reactive species are usually implicated, i.e., free nitrous acid (43) and peroxynitrite. The former forms through protonation of nitrite, while the latter forms from the reaction of nitrite with hydrogen peroxide (4446). Thus, two nonexclusive possible mechanisms of MnOX relief on nitrite toxicity are (i) that MnOX catalyzes oxidation of nitrite to nitrate (a reaction that has been shown to be chemically feasible under low-pH conditions [47]) and thereby avoids formation of either free nitrous acid or peroxynitrite, or (ii) that MnOX catalyzes degradation of hydrogen peroxide and thereby avoids the reaction of this compound with nitrite to form peroxynitrite.

To see if AzwK-3b-generated MnOX can catalyze nitrite oxidation under physiological conditions, we collected it from culture supernatants and evaluated its reactivity with nitrite in our ASWm (pH = 8.0). Over 27 days, we found that nitrite oxidation by biogenic MnOX occurred in a dose-dependent manner, while neither synthetic MnO2 powder nor the MnOX-free solution showed any significant nitrite oxidation (Fig. 7A). The trend of nitrite oxidation matched with that of nitrate production (Fig. 7B), thus confirming the assumed reaction pathway of nitrite oxidation into nitrate (47). Taking into account the difficulties of accurately determining the amount of precipitated MnOX that was added into the nitrite assay, we can still estimate that the highest MnOX levels were at least 1 to 2 mM (with respect to Mn). This presents a stoichiometric minimum 2-fold excess over nitrite (at 0.5 mM) and hence enough for complete nitrite oxidation. The fact that this reaction did not proceed further than an oxidation of ∼0.18 mM nitrite (i.e., ∼35%) indicates either that the biogenic MnOX was only partially reactive or that its reactivity reduced over time (as is known to be the case for synthetic manganese oxides [2, 13]). Sample pH remained relatively stable with the biogenic MnOX, while samples without manganese and with synthetic MnO2 reached pHs of 6.9 and 6.8, respectively, at the end of the experiment (from an initial pH of the medium of 8.2). This acidification of the control samples might be due to carbon dioxide dissolution; carbon dioxide might have been buffered in the samples with biogenic MnOX due to proton consumption during nitrite oxidation or due to coprecipitated organic solutes (polymers, proteins) from the cell-free supernatant.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Oxidation of nitrite by biogenic manganese oxide (MnOX) produced in cell-free culture supernatant of AzwK-3b. The figure shows the concentrations over time of nitrite (A) and nitrate (B), as determined by ion chromatography (note that concentrations were corrected for the IC peak from chloride, to account for evaporation during the experiment). As controls, samples without MnOX (green) or with MnO2 powder (orange) were included in the experiment (see Materials and Methods). The samples with AzwK-3b cell-free manganese oxide contained (from gray to black) 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mM manganese oxide equivalent (see Materials and Methods).

These findings confirmed that biogenic MnOX was capable of oxidizing nitrite under physiological conditions and prompted us to test MnOX-mediated nitrite oxidation directly in AzwK-3b cultures. We found some evidence for decreasing nitrite concentration in different cultures tested, but this was not significant (Fig. S7), and some decrease was also seen in the manganese-free cultures (indicating possible measurement effects in the solution). If nitrite oxidation was the main mechanism of MnOX-mediated protection in vivo, these cultures would have been expected to oxidize most of the nitrite present in the medium. Thus, we conclude that under our experimental conditions, nitrite oxidation was only a potential contributing factor.

A plausible alternative mechanism of MnOX-mediated nitrite inhibition relief could be related to formation of reactive peroxynitrite, which has been shown to be highly toxic to bacteria (45, 46, 48, 49) and which can form (particularly) at low pH from the reaction of hydrogen peroxide with nitrite (44). If peroxynitrite is the main species underpinning nitrite toxicity, then MnOX protection against nitrite could be due to its ability to degrade hydrogen peroxide, thereby reducing the rate of peroxynitrite formation. The reactivity of MnOX toward hydrogen peroxide has been chemically demonstrated (44, 5057), but never shown or tested in a biological context. Here, we hypothesized that if these types of redox reactions were involved in MnOX-mediated mitigation of nitrite inhibition, the process dynamics can be modulated with the introduction of additional hydrogen peroxide or NADH (which can help increase the rate of MnOX formation [23], but which can also be directly involved in hydrogen peroxide reduction through peroxidase-catalyzed reactions [1719, 58, 59]). To test this hypothesis, we again grew precultures of AzwK-3b without MnII and subcultured these in medium containing MnII and nitrite, but at the same time also spiking in hydrogen peroxide or NADH. Hydrogen peroxide spiking did not show any effect on nitrite inhibition or its release by MnII supplementation (Fig. S8), possibly due to spiked hydrogen peroxide being cleared primarily through additional peroxidases rather than impacting MnOX-mediated process dynamics. In line with this hypothesis, spiking NADH resulted in full mitigation of the nitrite-inhibitory effect (even without MnII) (Fig. 8). This suggests that nitrite toxicity relates to peroxynitrite formation via hydrogen peroxide, which can be decomposed by MnOX (as shown before [44, 5057]) or NADH-utilizing peroxidases (which are shown to be present in Roseobacter species, including strain AzwK-3b [22, 27]; see also Table S1).

FIG 8.

FIG 8

Reductive power (NADH) mitigates the growth inhibitory effects of nitrite in AzwK-3b. Cultures (preculture and main culture without manganese) were grown in the absence (A) and presence (B) of 5 mM nitrite and supplement of 0, 50, 100, and 200 μM NADH (black, red, green, and blue) at the start of the culture.

DISCUSSION

Manganese biomineralization into MnOX is widespread among bacteria, but there is no clarity about its possible functional roles. Here, we developed a defined growth medium for the manganese-oxidizing model organism Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b and demonstrated that, in a laboratory setting, this organism’s strong growth inhibition by nitrite is mitigated through its ability to precipitate biogenic MnOX. While our experiments were undertaken in an artificial lab environment, these findings provide direct evidence for the impact of MnOX on an organism’s growth, thus raising the possibility of a positive fitness effect and a possible ecological/evolutionary explanation for the costly process of MnOX oxidation.

Interestingly, we also show that the MnOX-mediated mitigation of nitrite toxicity is dependent on population size, and that MnOX forms dispersed granules that are attached to clusters of cells in the population. These observations, combined with the established role of exoenzymes in the formation of MnOX precipitates, suggest that these granules provide a community function to AzwK-3b and allow cultures grown to sufficient density in the presence of manganese to become resistant to the inhibitory effects of nitrite. Our attempts to elucidate the mechanistic basis of this functionality showed that biogenic MnOX can oxidize nitrite to nitrate (under conditions in which synthetic MnO2 cannot). Together with the known ability of MnOX to degrade hydrogen peroxide (44, 5057), these findings show that biogenic MnOX can inhibit the two key routes to the formation of reactive nitrite species.

While mitigation of nitrite inhibition might not be the only evolutionary advantage of MnOX oxidation in AzwK-3b or other manganese-oxidizing species, it is definitely an ecologically relevant function. Nitrite is a known inhibitor in the environment (41, 42, 60), including in wastewater treatment applications (43). In soil, reported nitrite concentrations are in the range of low μmol/kg or μM (61, 62), although they can peak to higher than 0.5 mmol/kg with agricultural nitrogen fertilization (61). In biofilms, where diffusion is inhibited, oxygen is shown to rapidly diminish (6365), which can favor anaerobic metabolism, including nitrate respiration to nitrite (66). Furthermore, biofilms are shown to preferentially select for and accumulate ions such as phosphate and nitrite (6769). For example, in freshwater lake biofilms, the annual variation range for nitrite was found to be in the range of μM to mM (i.e., 1,000-fold) in biofilms (68). In the case of AzwK-3b, these physical and ecological processes can be highly relevant, as this species was isolated from an “agriculturally impacted, shallow salt marsh” (20), where nitrite (among other nitrogen species) can occur due to microbial conversion of nitrogen fertilizers (61, 7072). It is also interesting to note that oceanic manganese-rich modules are found to contain both manganese-oxidizing and manganese-reducing bacteria (6), with current-day representatives of the latter group, such as Shewanella oneidensis (9), also being nitrate reducers (7375). Thus, these nodules also can or have harbored high levels of nitrite, creating environments that select for manganese oxidation.

Our study opens up additional investigations into the mechanism of nitrite toxicity and the role of MnOX oxidation in it. Multiple mechanisms of nitrite inhibition have been reported (41, 42), and a key role for free nitrous acid (i.e., protonated nitrite) (43) and peroxynitrite, from nitrite and hydrogen peroxide (4446), is proposed. Both molecules can prevent chemiosmotic coupling, and they are primarily formed at low pH (nitrite is often found to inhibit bacterial survival at a pH of <7 [45, 46]). Indeed, low pH can arise within the cellular microenvironment; energy metabolism coupled to chemiosmosis generates a proton motive force that can enrich the proton concentration at the charged membrane surface (values as low as pH 5.5 to 6.5 are discussed). This local low-pH environment can be further stabilized and inhibited from equilibration with the bulk due to an electrostatic barrier imposed by water layering (76, 77). Additionally, respiratory activity can increase hydrogen peroxide in the same cellular microenvironment (18, 48, 49, 58, 7885), which can facilitate nitrite conversion to peroxynitrite. Interestingly, these local conditions could be avoided through the presence of MnOX, which can degrade hydrogen peroxide and catalyze the oxidation of nitrite to nitrate, which is a proton-consuming process with an increased rate at low pH (47). The latter mechanism is confirmed here under physiological conditions, as we show that biogenic MnOX can also catalyze nitrite oxidation at pH 8.

MnOX-mediated hydrogen peroxide degradation as a mechanism to prevent peroxynitrite formation remains to be fully confirmed. Our experiments with spikes of hydrogen peroxide did not alter the gross dynamics of MnOX-mediated nitrite inhibition relief, but this could be due to the design of these experiments, with hydrogen peroxide delivered in single doses rather than being delivered in a controlled manner in the vicinity of the cells. A single dose could have been readily dealt with by additional peroxidases without altering MnOX-mediated effects. On the other hand, our observation that the nitrite stress is fully mitigated in NADH-supplemented cultures (even in the absence of MnOX) lends support to the idea that nitrite stress is mediated primarily through formation of peroxynitrite. In that case, the reductive power of NADH could be employed by peroxidases, as well as by MnOX, to reduce hydrogen peroxide (17, 58, 59), thereby stopping the formation of peroxynitrite and explaining the observed mitigation effect of NADH.

These possible mechanistic scenarios of nitrite toxicity, and the roles of NADH, peroxidases, and MnOX in mitigating it, can shed light on why and if manganese oxidation is a functional, actively evolved trait or not. In particular, it is not clear why cells that already have several peroxidases, such as those of strain AzwK-3b (22, 27) (Table S1), might invest additional energy in the formation of MnOX precipitates. One possibility is that the formation of MnOX is a mere side effect arising from the microbially generated superoxide (which is widespread among bacteria) (27) reacting with the manganese (MnII) and from the exoenzymes of AzwK-3b simply removing the resulting hydrogen peroxide that would otherwise lead to subsequent reduction of the oxidized manganese (24). An alternative possibility is that manganese oxidation is actively selected for due to the exact reaction mechanisms of ROS scavenging. It has been suggested, for example, that different ROS-scavenging enzymes have different substrate affinities and efficiencies (18). In this context, MnOX-mediated scavenging could be preferred under certain ROS concentrations and modes of production. In addition, and unlike peroxidases that require stoichiometric equivalents of reductants, such as, e.g., NADH/NADPH for hydrogen peroxide reduction (18, 19), MnOX in its different oxidation states (II, III, and IV) can, once formed, directly catalyze degradation of hydrogen peroxide without NADH involvement (23, 24, 26, 44, 5057). The fact that some peroxidases, as well as the AzwK-3b enzyme catalyzing MnOX formation, are exoenzymes (22, 86) could be also highly relevant. The expression of such exoenzymes is a “social trait” that can be exploited by cheating cells that do not invest the costs but reap the benefits (3639). The presented finding that MnOX forms dispersed granules in the (agitated) liquid culture of strain AzwK-3b shows that, in this case, the ultimate functional effects arising from exoenzyme activity are localized. This kind of localization is a known strategy to stabilize a social trait in the face of evolution of cheating, as seen in exoenzymes with localized actions involved in sugar degradation (87) and metal scavenging (88). Thus, the reductive energy investment into the formation of MnOX-mediated protection might be a metabolically less costly strategy that is also socially more stable, compared to, for example, exoenzymes that are freely diffusing.

Within a wider context, our findings are relevant to understanding the different forms of metal mineralization observed in different microorganisms and under different ecological contexts. Given the abundance of microorganisms involved in reactions of the nitrogen cycle, there is indeed potential transient accumulation of nitrite in different environments. It is also possible that MnOX (or other minerals) can provide broader protection against ROS chemistry. For example, manganese oxidation is also observed in spore-forming bacteria (89, 90), fungi, and other microorganisms (as reviewed and shown in references 2 and 40), where a role for nitrite stress remains to be elucidated. Our findings will facilitate such further studies of biomineralizing organisms and their different functional motives and social strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strain and culture conditions.

Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b was obtained from Colleen Hansel (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Falmouth, MA), who isolated the strain (20). Cultures were grown in a defined medium, which was established by modifying the predefined artificial seawater (ASW) medium (35). This modified artificial seawater medium is referred to here as ASWm, and its composition is shown in Table 1. ASWm contained sodium acetate as the sole carbon source (at concentrations specified per experiment), 200 mM sodium chloride (instead of 428 mM, as in ASW), ammonium as the nitrogen source (instead of nitrate, as in ASW), and five vitamins that were added as a supplement. In manganese-supplemented ASWm, manganese chloride (MnCl2) was added to a final concentration of 200 μM. Cultures were grown at 30°C in appropriate (100-ml) Erlenmeyer flasks (shaking at 150 strokes per minute) or 96-well polystyrene plates (Corning, Inc.) closed with a lid and Parafilm (shaking at 300 strokes per minute). For flask cultures, a MaxQ 4000 shaking incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used. Plates were incubated in a CLARIOstar plate reader (BMG Labtech), and absorbance measurements were done at 600 nm (A600) and with path length correction, so as to present absorbance per 1 cm.

Electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis of AzwK-3b cultures.

A culture of AzwK-3b cells (40 ml in 100-ml Erlenmeyer flasks) was inoculated in ASWm without manganese and nitrite and containing 50 mM acetate. After 3 days at 150 strokes per minute shaking at 30°C (by which time the culture reached the stationary phase), dilutions (25× to 200×) were made for a second passage of culture in the same medium, supplemented with 200 μM manganese. After a further 2 days of culturing, samples for electron microscopy (EM) were prepared as follows. Cells from 2.5 ml of culture were harvested by centrifugation (5 min at 5,000 × g), and the supernatant was discarded. From here, several washing and dehydration steps were conducted by resuspending the pellet in different solutions and subsequently centrifuging for 5 min at 5,000 × g (supernatant discarded), as follows: (i) first, pellets were twice resuspended in ASWm base salts (Table 1) (no manganese, no acetate, no ammonium, no nitrite, and no trace metals); (ii) afterwards, samples were resuspended in 200 μl of 70% ethanol, incubated for 1 min, and pelleted by centrifugation; (iii) for a washing-dehydration step, pellets were twice resuspended in 200 μl of 100% ethanol and harvested by centrifugation; and (iv) finally, samples were resuspended in 100 μl of 100% ethanol. This suspension was then applied to transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grids (Lacey carbon film-coated copper grids; Agar Scientific) by pipetting in 1-μl portions (allowed to dry in between) until a total of 2 or 5 μl was accumulated (on different grids). After letting them dry on the bench overnight, grids were analyzed by EM.

EM analysis was done on a Gemini scanning electron microscope (SEM) 500 (Zeiss) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) X-Max detector (Oxford Instruments). Data analysis was done on the associated AZtec software, which contained the spectral information to identify individual elements. Electron micrographs had the best quality in scanning transmission EM (STEM) mode with a high-angle annular dark-field detector (HAADF). For EDS, the sample needed to be moved, and the HAADF detector had to be withdrawn, so the location of analysis after changing the setup was confirmed by additional SEM recording. The HAADF recording presented in Fig. 6 was recorded at 25 kV and a 4.3-mm working distance, with a ×50,000 magnification. The EDS was recorded at 25 kV, and spectra were accumulated for the same amount of time (40 s for the two locations compared in Fig. 6).

Large inoculum preparation for nitrite assays.

AzwK-3b cultures were grown in Erlenmeyer flasks (usually 40 ml culture volume in a 100-ml Erlenmeyer flask) in ASWm with 25 mM acetate. The culture absorbance (A600) was recorded regularly on a Spectronic 200 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher) with 1-cm path length polystyrene cuvettes, and inocula were sampled at various stages of the growth curve (e.g., see Fig. S4, S6, and S8 in the supplemental material). This culture was used for inoculation into 96-well plates, which were supplemented by 1:1 dilution with fresh medium supplemented with manganese and/or nitrite and other additives, as described for the particular results shown (legends of Fig. 4 and 6 and Fig. S6 and S8). Where noted (see respective figure captions), the fresh medium used for dilution was also supplemented with NADH or hydrogen peroxide at different concentrations. NADH or hydrogen peroxide was the last additive (to prevent reactions, e.g., between hydrogen peroxide and MnII, before inoculation), and the completed fresh medium was used immediately.

Growth curve fitting and analysis.

Growth curves were analyzed using the R package Grofit (91), applying the Gompertz growth model (91, 92). Plate reader data (measurements every 10 min) were denoised by averaging over 6 measurements (i.e., hourly averages). The maximum A600 reached was read directly from the data. For curve fitting, all data obtained later than the maximum A600, i.e., the decaying growth phase, were removed. Then, the data were read backwards in time to find the first reading that was below 5% of the maximum A600. This data trimming was done to facilitate the fitting of the Gompertz growth model without bias from different lag phases (which were ignored), or different lengths and scales of decaying phases recorded. From the resulting model, the maximum growth rate, μ (in A600 [absorbance units] per hour), was recorded.

Preparation of cell-free bio-manganese oxide.

The procedure was adapted from previous publications using the cell-free supernatant of Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b cultures grown in complex medium (20, 2224). AzwK-3b was grown in ASWm supplemented with 50 mM sodium acetate for 9 days, using individual 50- or 100-ml cultures in 100- or 200-ml Erlenmeyer flasks, respectively, at 30°C with shaking (150 strokes per minute). In total, 2 liters of culture was prepared, cells were removed by centrifugation (5 min at 10,000 × g), and the supernatants were combined. From this (cell-free) supernatant, individual samples of 100 or 200 ml were prepared and supplemented with 200 μM manganese chloride (MnCl2). Manganese oxidation was allowed to proceed for 5 days at 30°C with shaking (150 strokes per minute), after which the manganese oxide was harvested by centrifugation (5 min at 10,000 × g) from each 50- or 100-ml sample. These were combined and washed by suspending in 25 ml acetate-free ASWm and resedimented by centrifugation. The pellet was brown in appearance and had considerable volume, indicating coprecipitation of organic material (e.g., secreted proteins) from the cell culture supernatant. To estimate the amount of manganese precipitated in the assay, the supernatants from centrifugation and the washing steps were combined, and the residual manganese was determined by the 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) assay (93) for soluble manganese. Note that this was not a precise quantification, but it was conclusive enough to allow conservative stoichiometric relations to be inferred. In particular, we inferred that ca. 75% of the 200 μM manganese chloride had been removed from the solution, and this value was used for downstream calculations. The MnOX precipitate was suspended in an appropriate volume of the acetate-free medium to produce a “10 mM” suspension of manganese oxide, and this value is used in this study as an indicator for manganese oxide concentration. The pH was 8.2, which is well in line with the pH 8.0 of the ASWm, showing that the suspended manganese oxide did not alter the pH.

Quantification of nitrite, nitrate, and acetate.

Quantification was done by ion chromatography (IC) on a Dionex ICS-5000+ instrument (Thermo Fisher, UK) equipped with a conductivity detector, potassium hydroxide (KOH) eluent generator, appropriate suppressor, and a Dionex IonPac AS11-HC-4μm anion separation column (2 × 250 mm; Thermo Fisher, UK) with appropriate guard column. Culture samples were filtered with a 0.22-μm polyamide spin filter (Costar Spin-X; Corning, NY) and diluted 10-fold with MilliQ water (resistance [R], >18.2 MΩ), of which 2.5 μl was injected for IC separation. The IC was run as a continuous gradient, as follows (flow rate, 0.38 ml/min; column temperature, 30°C; conductivity detector cell temperature, 35°C): −7 to 0 min, 1.5 mM KOH (equilibration); 0 to 8 min, 1.5 mM KOH; 8 to 18 min, increase to 15 mM KOH; 18 to 23 min, increase to 24 mM KOH; 23 to 24 min, increase to 60 mM KOH; and 24 to 30 min, stay at 60 mM KOH. Reference samples with known concentrations were run for calibration. During the course of the experiments, evaporation of the samples was noted (indicated by the increase in the peak area of chloride, which is expected to be unaltered by any biologic means and which therefore should have displayed no concentration change). To correct for this evaporation effect, the concentrations of the analytes of interest were corrected by the same ratio as that obtained from the chloride peak area (from the beginning and endpoint samples of a particular time course experiment).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
AEM.02129-18-s0001.pdf (909.7KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is funded by The University of Warwick and by the Biotechnological and Biological, Natural Environment, and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Councils (BBSRC, NESRC, and EPSRC) under grants BB/K003240/2 (to O.S.S.), NE/K009044/1 (to J.A.C.-O.), and BB/M017982/1 (to the Warwick Integrative Synthetic Biology Centre [WISB]). We thank Colleen Hansel (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) for providing Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b, and Steve York from the Electron Microscopy Research Technology Platform (EM RTP) at the Materials Science Department (Physics, University of Warwick) for EM/EDS measurements.

We declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

C.Z., J.A.C.-O., and O.S.S. designed the study and the experiments. C.Z. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02129-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lowenstam H. 1981. Minerals formed by organisms. Science 211:1126–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.7008198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hansel CM. 2017. Manganese in marine microbiology, p 37–83. In Poole RK. (ed), Advances in microbial physiology: microbiology of metal ions. Academic Press, Oxford, UK. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nealson KH. 2006. The manganese-oxidizing bacteria. Prokaryotes 5:222–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ghiorse WC. 1984. Biology of iron-and manganese-depositing bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 38:515–550. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.38.100184.002503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Spiro TG, Bargar JR, Sposito G, Tebo BM. 2010. Bacteriogenic manganese oxides. Acc Chem Res 43:2–9. doi: 10.1021/ar800232a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blöthe M, Wegorzewski A, Müller C, Simon F, Kuhn T, Schippers A. 2015. Manganese-cycling microbial communities inside deep-sea manganese nodules. Environ Sci Technol 49:7692–7700. doi: 10.1021/es504930v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tebo BM, Johnson HA, McCarthy JK, Templeton AS. 2005. Geomicrobiology of manganese(II) oxidation. Trends Microbiol 13:421–428. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Geszvain K, Butterfield C, Davis RE, Madison AS, Lee S-W, Parker DL, Soldatova A, Spiro TG, Luther GW, Tebo BM. 2012. The molecular biogeochemistry of manganese(II) oxidation. Biochem Soc Trans 40:1244–1248. doi: 10.1042/BST20120229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Myers CR, Nealson KH. 1988. Bacterial manganese reduction and growth with manganese oxide as the sole electron acceptor. Science 240:1319–1321. doi: 10.1126/science.240.4857.1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Venkateswaran K, Moser DP, Dollhopf ME, Lies DP, Saffarini DA, MacGregor BJ, Ringelberg DB, White DC, Nishijima M, Sano H, Burghardt J, Stackebrandt E, Nealson KH. 1999. Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus Shewanella and description of Shewanella oneidensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:705–724. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lovley DR. 1993. Dissimilatory metal reduction. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:263–290. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.001403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Emerson D, Fleming EJ, McBeth JM. 2010. Iron-oxidizing bacteria: an environmental and genomic perspective. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:561–583. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Remucal CK, Ginder-Vogel M. 2014. A critical review of the reactivity of manganese oxides with organic contaminants. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16:1247–1266. doi: 10.1039/c3em00703k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Banh A, Chavez V, Doi J, Nguyen A, Hernandez S, Ha V, Jimenez P, Espinoza F, Johnson HA. 2013. Manganese (Mn) oxidation increases intracellular Mn in Pseudomonas putida GB-1. PLoS One 8:e77835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sunda WG, Kieber DJ. 1994. Oxidation of humic substances by manganese oxides yields low-molecular-weight organic substrates. Nature 367:62–64. doi: 10.1038/367062a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Keiluweit M, Nico P, Harmon ME, Mao J, Pett-Ridge J, Kleber M. 2015. Long-term litter decomposition controlled by manganese redox cycling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E5253–E5260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508945112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Farr SB, Kogoma T. 1991. Oxidative stress responses in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Microbiol Rev 55:561–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mishra S, Imlay J. 2012. Why do bacteria use so many enzymes to scavenge hydrogen peroxide? Arch Biochem Biophys 525:145–160. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zamocky M, Furtmüller PG, Obinger C. 2008. Evolution of catalases from bacteria to humans. Antioxid Redox Signal 10:1527–1548. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hansel CM, Francis CA. 2006. Coupled photochemical and enzymatic Mn(II) oxidation pathways of a planktonic Roseobacter-like bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3543–3549. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3543-3549.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Estes ER, Andeer PF, Nordlund D, Wankel SD, Hansel CM. 2017. Biogenic manganese oxides as reservoirs of organic carbon and proteins in terrestrial and marine environments. Geobiology 15:158–172. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Andeer PF, Learman DR, McIlvin M, Dunn JA, Hansel CM. 2015. Extracellular haem peroxidases mediate Mn(II) oxidation in a marine Roseobacter bacterium via superoxide production. Environ Microbiol 17:3925–3936. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Learman DR, Voelker BM, Vazquez-Rodriguez AI, Hansel CM. 2011. Formation of manganese oxides by bacterially generated superoxide. Nat Geosci 4:95–98. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Learman DR, Voelker BM, Madden AS, Hansel CM. 2013. Constraints on superoxide mediated formation of manganese oxides. Front Microbiol 4:262. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Learman DR, Wankel SD, Webb SM, Martinez N, Madden AS, Hansel CM. 2011. Coupled biotic–abiotic Mn(II) oxidation pathway mediates the formation and structural evolution of biogenic Mn oxides. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:6048–6063. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luther GW. 2010. The role of one- and two-electron transfer reactions in forming thermodynamically unstable intermediates as barriers in multi-electron redox reactions. Aquat Geochem 16:395–420. doi: 10.1007/s10498-009-9082-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Diaz JM, Hansel CM, Voelker BM, Mendes CM, Andeer PF, Zhang T. 2013. Widespread production of extracellular superoxide by heterotrophic bacteria. Science 340:1223–1226. doi: 10.1126/science.1237331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Learman DR, Hansel CM. 2014. Comparative proteomics of Mn(II)-oxidizing and non-oxidizing Roseobacter clade bacteria reveal an operative manganese transport system but minimal Mn(II)-induced expression of manganese oxidation and antioxidant enzymes. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:501–509. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tebo BM, Bargar JR, Clement BG, Dick GJ, Murray KJ, Parker D, Verity R, Webb SM. 2004. Biogenic manganese oxides: properties and mechanisms of formation. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 32:287–328. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Templeton AS, Staudigel H, Tebo BM. 2005. Diverse Mn(II)-oxidizing bacteria isolated from submarine basalts at Loihi seamount. Geomicrobiol J 22:127–139. doi: 10.1080/01490450590945951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Francis CA, Co E-M, Tebo BM. 2001. Enzymatic manganese(II) oxidation by a marine α-proteobacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4024–4029. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4024-4029.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Johnson HA, Tebo BM. 2008. In vitro studies indicate a quinone is involved in bacterial Mn(II) oxidation. Arch Microbiol 189:59–69. doi: 10.1007/s00203-007-0293-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang X, Wiens M, Divekar M, Grebenjuk VA, Schröder HC, Batel R, Müller WEG. 2010. Isolation and characterization of a Mn(II)-oxidizing Bacillus strain from the demosponge Suberites domuncula. Mar Drugs 9:1–28. doi: 10.3390/md9010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kraft B, Strous M, Tegetmeyer HE. 2011. Microbial nitrate respiration—genes, enzymes and environmental distribution. J Biotechnol 155:104–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wilson WH, Carr NG, Mann NH. 1996. The effect of phosphate status on the kinetics of cyanophage infection in the oceanic cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. WH78031. J Phycol 32:506–516. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1996.00506.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cavaliere M, Feng S, Soyer OS, Jiménez JI. 2017. Cooperation in microbial communities and their biotechnological applications. Environ Microbiol 19:2949–2963. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Allen B, Gore J, Nowak MA. 2013. Spatial dilemmas of diffusible public goods. Elife 2:e01169. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.West SA, Diggle SP, Buckling A, Gardner A, Griffin AS. 2007. The social lives of microbes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:53–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Allison SD. 2005. Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8:626–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00756.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Keim CN, Nalini HA, de Lena JC. 2015. Manganese oxide biominerals from freshwater environments in Quadrilatero Ferrifero, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Geomicrobiol J 32:549–559. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2014.978513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cammack R, Joannou C, Cui X-Y, Torres Martinez C, Maraj SR, Hughes MN. 1999. Nitrite and nitrosyl compounds in food preservation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1411:475–488. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(99)00033-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Müller-Herbst S, Mühlig A, Kabisch J, Rohtraud P, Scherer S. 2015. The food additives nitrite and nitrate and microbiological safety of food products. Am J Microbiol 6:1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhou Y, Oehmen A, Lim M, Vadivelu V, Ng WJ. 2011. The role of nitrite and free nitrous acid (FNA) in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 45:4672–4682. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Robinson KM, Beckman JS. 2005. Synthesis of peroxynitrite from nitrite and hydrogen peroxide. Methods Enzymol 396:207–214. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)96019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Heaselgrave W, Andrew PW, Kilvington S. 2010. Acidified nitrite enhances hydrogen peroxide disinfection of acanthamoeba, bacteria and fungi. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1207–1214. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kono Y, Shibata H, Adachi K, Tanaka K. 1994. Lactate-dependent killing of Escherichia coli by nitrite plus hydrogen peroxide: a possible role of nitrogen dioxide. Arch Biochem Biophys 311:153–159. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1994.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Luther GW III, Popp JI. 2002. Kinetics of the abiotic reduction of polymeric manganese dioxide by nitrite: an anaerobic nitrification reaction. Aquat Geochem 8:15–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1020325604920. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Martínez MC, Andriantsitohaina R. 2009. Reactive nitrogen species: molecular mechanisms and potential significance in health and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 11:669–702. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tharmalingam S, Alhasawi A, Appanna VP, Lemire J, Appanna VD. 2017. Reactive nitrogen species (RNS)-resistant microbes: adaptation and medical implications. Biol Chem 398:1193–1208. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2017-0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Watts RJ, Sarasa J, Loge FJ, Teel AL. 2005. Oxidative and reductive pathways in manganese-catalyzed Fenton’s reactions. J Environ Eng 131:158–164. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:1(158). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jiang S, Ashton WR, Tseung ACC. 1991. An observation of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis processes in the decomposition of H2O2 over MnO2 and Mn(OH)2. J Catal 131:88–93. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(91)90325-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kanungo SB, Parida KM, Sant BR. 1981. Studies on MnO2—III. The kinetics and the mechanism for the catalytic decomposition of H2O2 over different crystalline modifications of MnO2. Electrochim Acta 26:1157–1167. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(81)85093-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rophael MW, Petro NS, Khalil LB. 1988. II — kinetics of the catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide solution by manganese dioxide samples. J Power Sources 22:149–161. doi: 10.1016/0378-7753(88)87004-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Do S-H, Batchelor B, Lee H-K, Kong S-H. 2009. Hydrogen peroxide decomposition on manganese oxide (pyrolusite): kinetics, intermediates, and mechanism. Chemosphere 75:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li W, Liu Z, Liu C, Guan Y, Ren J, Qu X. 2017. Manganese dioxide nanozymes as responsive cytoprotective shells for individual living cell encapsulation. Angew Chem Int ed Engl 56:13661–13665. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Broughton DB, Wentworth RL. 1947. Mechanism of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide solutions with manganese dioxide. I. J Am Chem Soc 69:741–744. doi: 10.1021/ja01196a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Broughton DB, Wentworth RL, Laing ME. 1947. Mechanism of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide solutions with manganese dioxide. II. J Am Chem Soc 69:744–747. doi: 10.1021/ja01196a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Seaver LC, Imlay JA. 2001. Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase is the primary scavenger of endogenous hydrogen peroxide in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 183:7173–7181. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7173-7181.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nathan C, Bryk R, Griffin P. 2000. Peroxynitrite reductase activity of bacterial peroxiredoxins. Nature 407:211–215. doi: 10.1038/35025109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Camargo JA, Alonso A. 2006. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environ Int 32:831–849. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cleemput O, Samater AH. 1995. Nitrite in soils: accumulation and role in the formation of gaseous N compounds. Fertil Res 45:81–89. doi: 10.1007/BF00749884. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Homyak PM, Vasquez KT, Sickman JO, Parker DR, Schimel JP. 2015. improving nitrite analysis in soils: drawbacks of the conventional 2 M KCl extraction. Soil Sci Soc Am J 79:1237. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2015.02.0061n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Peters AC, Wimpenny JWT, Coombs JP. 1987. Oxygen profiles in, and in the agar beneath, colonies of Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus albus and Escherichia coli. Microbiology 133:1257–1263. doi: 10.1099/00221287-133-5-1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jiang X, Zerfaß C, Feng S, Eichmann R, Asally M, Schäfer P, Soyer OS. 2018. Impact of spatial organization on a novel auxotrophic interaction among soil microbes. ISME J 12:1443–1456. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0095-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dietrich LEP, Okegbe C, Price-Whelan A, Sakhtah H, Hunter RC, Newman DK. 2013. Bacterial community morphogenesis is intimately linked to the intracellular redox state. J Bacteriol 195:1371–1380. doi: 10.1128/JB.02273-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Stewart PS. 2003. Diffusion in biofilms. J Bacteriol 185:1485–1491. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.5.1485-1491.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tsuchiya Y, Eda S, Kiriyama C, Asada T, Morisaki H. 2016. Analysis of dissolved organic nutrients in the interstitial water of natural biofilms. Microb Ecol 72:85–95. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0749-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tsuchiya Y, Ikenaga M, Kurniawan A, Hiraki A, Arakawa T, Kusakabe R, Morisaki H. 2009. Nutrient-rich microhabitats within biofilms are synchronized with the external environment. Microbes Environ 24:43–51. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME08547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kurniawan A, Yamamoto T, Tsuchiya Y, Morisaki H. 2012. Analysis of the ion adsorption-desorption characteristics of biofilm matrices. Microbes Environ 27:399–406. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Riley WJ, Ortiz-Monasterio I, Matson PA. 2001. Nitrogen leaching and soil nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium levels under irrigated wheat in Northern Mexico. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 61:223–236. doi: 10.1023/A:1013758116346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lawniczak AE, Zbierska J, Nowak B, Achtenberg K, Grześkowiak A, Kanas K. 2016. Impact of agriculture and land use on nitrate contamination in groundwater and running waters in central-west Poland. Environ Monit Assess 188:172. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5167-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Beeckman F, Motte H, Beeckman T. 2018. Nitrification in agricultural soils: impact, actors and mitigation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 50:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cruz-García C, Murray AE, Klappenbach JA, Stewart V, Tiedje JM. 2007. Respiratory nitrate ammonification by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J Bacteriol 189:656–662. doi: 10.1128/JB.01194-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chen Y, Wang F. 2015. Insights on nitrate respiration by Shewanella. Front Mar Sci 1:80. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhang H, Fu H, Wang J, Sun L, Jiang Y, Zhang L, Gao H. 2013. Impacts of nitrate and nitrite on physiology of Shewanella oneidensis. PLoS One 8:e62629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mulkidjanian AY, Heberle J, Cherepanov DA. 2006. Protons @ interfaces: implications for biological energy conversion. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1757:913–930. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Busch KB, Deckers-Hebestreit G, Hanke GT, Mulkidjanian AY. 2013. Dynamics of bioenergetic microcompartments. Biol Chem 394:163–188. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2012-0254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.van der Heijden J, Vogt SL, Reynolds LA, Peña-Díaz J, Tupin A, Aussel L, Finlay BB. 2016. Exploring the redox balance inside gram-negative bacteria with redox-sensitive GFP. Free Radic Biol Med 91:34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Seaver LC, Imlay JA. 2001. Hydrogen peroxide fluxes and compartmentalization inside growing Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 183:7182–7189. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7182-7189.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.González-Flecha B, Demple B. 1995. Metabolic sources of hydrogen peroxide in aerobically growing Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 270:13681–13687. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.23.13681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Gutteridge JM. 1994. Biological origin of free radicals, and mechanisms of antioxidant protection. Chem Biol Interact 91:133–140. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(94)90033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Quijano C, Trujillo M, Castro L, Trostchansky A. 2016. Interplay between oxidant species and energy metabolism. Redox Biol 8:28–42. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Davies KJ. 1995. Oxidative stress: the paradox of aerobic life. Biochem Soc Symp 61:1–31. doi: 10.1042/bss0610001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Korshunov S, Imlay JA. 2010. Two sources of endogenous hydrogen peroxide in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 75:1389–1401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07059.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.van der Heijden J, Vogt SL, Reynolds LA, Peña-Díaz J, Tupin A, Aussel L, Finlay BB. 2016. Analysis of bacterial survival after exposure to reactive oxygen species or antibiotics. Data Brief 7:894–899. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.03.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Christie-Oleza JA, Scanlan DJ, Armengaud J. 2015. “You produce while I clean up”, a strategy revealed by exoproteomics during Synechococcus-Roseobacter interactions. Proteomics 15:3454–3462. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201400562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gore J, Youk H, van Oudenaarden A. 2009. Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. Nature 459:253–256. doi: 10.1038/nature07921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kümmerli R, Jiricny N, Clarke LS, West SA, Griffin AS. 2009. Phenotypic plasticity of a cooperative behaviour in bacteria. J Evol Biol 22:589–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Francis CA, Tebo BM. 2002. Enzymatic manganese(II) oxidation by metabolically dormant spores of diverse Bacillus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:874–880. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.874-880.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bargar J, Tebo B, Villinski J. 2000. In situ characterization of Mn(II) oxidation by spores of the marine Bacillus sp. strain SG-1. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:2775–2778. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00368-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kahm M, Hasenbrink G, Lichtenberg-Fraté H, Ludwig J, Kschischo M. 2010. Grofit: fitting biological growth curves with R. J Stat Softw 33:1–21.20808728 [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zwietering MH, Jongenburger I, Rombouts FM, van ’t Riet K. 1990. Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1875–1881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bosch Serrat F. 1998. 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine for the colorimetric determination of manganese in water. Mikrochim Acta 129:77–80. doi: 10.1007/BF01246852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Tang YJ, Laidlaw D, Gani K, Keasling JD. 2006. Evaluation of the effects of various culture conditions on Cr(VI) reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 in a novel high-throughput mini-bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 95:176–184. doi: 10.1002/bit.21002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR, Wolfe RS. 1979. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev 43:260–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
AEM.02129-18-s0001.pdf (909.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES