Abstract
Cancer remains a serious healthcare problem despite significant improvements in early detection and treatment approaches in the past few decades. Novel biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. In recent years, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to be aberrantly expressed in tumors and show crosstalk with key cancer-related signaling pathways. In this review, we summarized the current progress of research on cytoplasmic lncRNAs and their roles in regulating cancer signaling and tumor progression, further characterization of which may lead to effective approaches for cancer prevention and therapy.
Keywords: Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), Cancer signaling, Cancer therapy, Biomarker
1. Introduction
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are noncoding RNAs with transcript lengths over 200 nucleotides (Gibb et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2018). LncRNAs are involved in various human diseases, including inflammatory pathologies, neurological diseases, and various types of cancers (Ponting et al., 2009; Tano and Akimitsu, 2012; Zheng et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2018; Sang et al., 2018). Moreover, they are abnormally expressed in tumors and play regulatory roles in cell physiological processes, including cell proliferation, migration, metastasis, and invasion in cancers (Lin et al., 2014a, 2017; Xing et al., 2014). Signaling pathways regulate a variety of cellular biological processes, which determine the traits of an organism (Gutschner and Diederichs, 2012; Zheng et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2018; Sang et al., 2018). In addition, it has been reported that almost all tumors exhibit dysfunctional signaling pathways (Pawson and Warner, 2007). Aberrant activation of signaling pathways, including that of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/serine-threonine-protein kinase (AKT) (Lin et al., 2014a, 2014b), Wnt (Angers and Moon, 2009), Notch (Ntziachristos et al., 2014), and Hippo/YAP (Li et al., 2017), contributes to cancer cell proliferation, activation of angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis.
Increasing evidence has shown that lncRNAs are located in the cytosol and are involved in multiple signaling pathways (Prensner and Chinnaiyan, 2011; Cheetham et al., 2013). The crosstalk between the signaling pathways and lncRNAs greatly impacts disease progression (Wang et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2017; Yan et al., 2017). There are many well-characterized lncRNAs that remodel signal transduction by various approaches, ranging from modulating components of signaling pathways to regulating the expression of targeted genes (Gutschner and Diederichs, 2012; Yang et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015). The regulatory roles of lncRNAs enable them to function as oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes, regulating cancer signaling pathways positively or negatively, respectively, and thus, affecting disease progression. In this review, we provide an overview of the regulatory functions of lncRNAs in cancer signal transduction, and provide insights into the mechanisms by which these lncRNAs-associated pathways regulate tumor progression. Further exploration of the lncRNA-based signaling pathways will provide us an in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying various diseases and lay the foundation for development of new targeted therapeutic intervention for these diseases.
2. LncRNAs-associated cancer signaling pathways
LncRNAs have been reported to be dysregulated in many types of cancers during tumor initiation, development, and progression (Batista and Chang, 2013; Atala, 2014; Sang et al., 2018). However, understanding the function of individual lncRNAs in tumorigenesis remains challenging. Recently, we have elucidated a novel lncRNA-mediated signaling pathway in breast cancer metastasis. It indicated that lncRNA BCAR4 contributes to breast cancer metastasis via chemokine-induced binding of BCAR4 to two transcription factors having extended regulatory consequences. Moreover, BCAR4 wires up Hippo and Hedgehog signaling to reprogram glucose metabolism (Xing et al., 2014; Zheng et al., 2017). Besides, plasma lipid-associated lncRNA has been shown to regulate normoxic hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) stabilization (Lin et al., 2016, 2017). These studies highlighted a crucial role of lncRNAs in cancer-related signaling pathways.
2.1. PI3K/AKT signaling pathway
The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway regulates many cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, survival, and migration (Luo et al., 2003; Mayer and Arteaga, 2016). This pathway is activated abnormally in many human malignancies, including breast cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and endometrial cancer (Vivanco and Sawyers, 2002; Altomare and Testa, 2005; Hirai et al., 2010). Interaction between phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) and pleckstrin homology (PH) domain facilitates AKT phosphorylation at Ser473 and Thr308 by phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), respectively (Manning and Cantley, 2007). The phosphorylated AKT is activated, which further activates its downstream substrates, thereby regulating tumor growth and metastasis (Citri and Yarden, 2006). Long intergenic noncoding RNA for kinase activation (LINK-A) has been found to be highly expressed in breast cancer, and is associated with prognosis in breast cancer patients. It has been found that LINK-A interacts with PIP3 (Lin et al., 2017). Although RNAs have been hypothesized to play essential roles during the origin of life, the role of RNAs in direct mediation of fundamental cellular processes remains largely unknown. Mechanistically, LINK-A directly promotes interactions between the plasma membrane phospholipid PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and AKT PH domain to facilitate the activation of AKT. LINK-A-dependent AKT hyperphosphorylation further activates its downstream substrates, resulting in tumor cell resistance to AKT inhibitors, and promoting tumorigenesis and metastasis. The deletion of the LINK-A-PIP3 binding motif renders breast cancer cells sensitive to AKT inhibitors. This PIP3-binding lncRNA regulates AKT activation with broad clinical significance. This study suggested an RNA molecule as a key mediator and catalyst involved in signal transduction, as well as a mediator of the related biological processes through direct association with lipids (Lin et al., 2017).
Further study also revealed gene amplification and a genetic variant (rs12095274: A>G) of LINK-A that significantly affects AKT activation and the outcome of breast cancer patients (Lin et al., 2017). In further single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, GG and AA genotypes were marked as homozygotes, and the AG genotype was marked as heterozygote. Analysis of 923 breast cancer samples showed that LINK-A was highly expressed in individuals with GG genotype, who also showed significantly higher breast cancer incidence and poorer survival time than individuals with AA genotype. Moreover, the SNP at this location showed different distribution in African, European, and Asian populations, suggesting that this lncRNA may have a role in physiology and pathology of human cancers. In light of the current lack of functional genetic association of lncRNAs with cancer, this study links an lncRNA-associated SNP to the regulation of AKT and its downstream oncogenic signaling.
2.2. HIF-1α signaling pathway
HIFs are transcription factors that control energy, iron metabolism, erythropoiesis, and development, which are activated under hypoxic or pseudohypoxic conditions, and mediate adaptive responses of cells against these states (Pawson and Warner, 2007; Kaelin and Ratcliffe, 2008). HIFs consist of a stably expressed β-subunit and an oxygen-sensitive α-subunit, and is classified into three types: HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and HIF-3α (Kaelin and Ratcliffe, 2008; Keith et al., 2011). HIF-1α is expressed in all types of cells, and is significantly upregulated in most human cancers (Talks et al., 2000). The expression of HIF-1α is significantly upregulated during malignancies. High level of HIF-1α promotes the transcription of genes involved in glucose and glutamine metabolism, and promotes angiogenesis and glycolysis (Denko, 2008), which contributes to tumor proliferation and progress (Zhong et al., 1999; Kuschel et al., 2012). In addition, HIF-1α functionally interacts with many other signal transduction and transcription systems, including the NOTCH, WNT, and MYC pathways (Kaelin and Ratcliffe, 2008). It has been reported that lncRNA LINK-A could promote triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumorigenesis by regulating the HIF-1α-associated signaling pathway (Miah et al., 2012; Schwab et al., 2012). Mechanically, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF)-mediated stimulation of EGF receptor (EGFR) and its consequent heterodimerization with the receptor glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB) lead to the recruitment of a complex composed of LINK-A, breast tumor kinase (BRK), and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2). LINK-A, a key signaling molecule, modifies the conformation of BRK and scaffolds LRRK2 kinases, which phosphorylates HIF-1α to promote its stabilization and transcriptional activity under normoxic conditions. This study revealed a novel HIF-1α regulatory mechanism functional under normoxic conditions, divergent from the classical view held in the field of cancer biology for decades (Lin et al., 2016). This lncRNA-driven machinery highlights the magnitude and diversity of cytoplasmic lncRNAs in signal transduction. Clinically, monoclonal antibodies, small molecule inhibitors, and locked nucleic acids (LNAs) that target GPNMB, BRK, LINK-A, HIF-1α, and LRRK2 could all serve as promising therapeutic targets for TNBC treatment. The expression level of LINK-A, as well as the phosphorylation status of EGFR, GPNMB, BRK, and HIF-1α, could be considered as promising prognostic markers of TNBC patients, which would be of therapeutic significance.
2.3. Hippo signaling pathway
Over the past few decades, the Hippo pathway has been established as a tumor suppressor pathway because it restricts proliferation and induces apoptosis (Pan, 2010; Zhao et al., 2010; Halder and Johnson, 2011; Zhou et al., 2015). Dysregulation of the Hippo pathway is associated with a broad spectrum of cancers (Pan, 2010; Harvey et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2015). YAP has been identified as an oncoprotein associated with breast cancer (Overholtzer et al., 2006) and is highly expressed in human breast cancer samples (Dong et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2015). Loss of YAP suppresses oncogene-induced tumor growth in mouse mammary glands (Chen et al., 2014). In addition, YAP promotes breast cancer cell survival and mobility (Wang et al., 2012; Haskins et al., 2014; Salah et al., 2014; Song et al., 2015). Similar to an earlier study (Overholtzer et al., 2006), YAP overexpression in non-transformed mammary epithelial cells (i.e. MCF10A) led to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, suppression of apoptosis, growth factor-independent proliferation, and anchorage-independent growth (Wang et al., 2011, 2012). Moreover, in vivo studies have also revealed the abilities of YAP (or its analog TAZ) in promoting human breast cancer metastasis, maintaining self-renewal and tumor-initiation capacities of breast cancer stem cells (Lian et al., 2010; Cordenonsi et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012; Beyer et al., 2013). These findings not only revealed the critical roles of the Hippo-YAP pathway in human breast cancer development and progression, but, more importantly, also proposed YAP as a therapeutic target for breast cancer treatment. However, the detailed mechanisms beyond the restriction of cell proliferation and survival are yet to be fully understood, which could be explained by the lack of well-defined cellular functions of the downstream effector YAP. A previous study indicated that lncRNA MAYA mediated methylation and upstream kinase activity of MST1/2 in Hippo signaling, which consequently led to failure of LATS1 phosphorylation and activation of YAP1 target genes (Li et al., 2017). A recent study also uncovered an lncRNA BCAR4 as a direct transcriptional target of YAP, which is involved in the YAP-dependent glycolysis. Mechanistically, long-term-activated YAP upregulated the transcription of BCAR4, which, in turn, promoted the transcription of two glycolysis-related enzymes HK2 and PFKFB3, through Hedgehog effector GLI2/p300 complex-mediated histone acetylation marked by H3K27ac. Intriguingly, targeting the YAP-BCAR4/Hedgehog-HK2/PFKFB3 axis using BCAR4 antisense-LNA or inhibitors of HK2 and PFKFB3 dramatically suppressed the YAP-dependent glycolysis and YAP-induced cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Pathologically, the expression level of BCAR4 is positively correlated to YAP in breast cancer patient samples, in which low expression of both BCAR4 and YAP favors the recurrence-free survival rate of breast cancer patients. This study revealed that lncRNA BCAR4 is an essential downstream mediator of the Hippo-YAP pathway, involved in reprogramming glucose metabolism, which will potentially transform the prevailing dogma of cancer signaling and metabolism. Moreover, the identification of a new YAP-BCAR4/Hedgehog-glycolysis signaling axis in breast cancer also provides additional therapeutic targets for breast cancer patients.
3. Conclusions and perspective
There have been a number of studies reporting that dysregulation of lncRNAs and related signaling pathways are tightly associated with tumor cells or immune cells (Table 1). These lncRNAs could be considered as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis (Wapinski and Chang, 2011; Ling et al., 2013). For example, lnc-DC has been indicated to bind to STAT3 in the cytoplasm and prevent its dephosphorylation by SHP1, serving as an indicator for development of dendritic cells (DCs) (Wang et al., 2014). LncRNA NKILA regulates IκB kinase (IKK)-induced inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) phosphorylation and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation, indicating its essential roles in cancer metastasis (Liu et al., 2015). H19 interacts with p53 and induces p53 inactivation, and its upregulation promotes gastric cancer (GC) cell proliferation and GC tumor progression, suggesting that H19 status in tumors may be a useful tool for detecting prognosis of a patient suffering from GC (Hadji et al., 2016).
Table 1.
Gene | Main distribution | Related signaling pathway | Mechanism | Reference |
LINK-A | Triple-negative breast tumor | HIF-1α | Mediates HB-EGF triggered, EGFR:GPNMB heterodimer-dependent HIF-1α phosphorylation, leading to HIF-1α stabilization and activation of HIF-1α transcriptional programs | Lin et al., 2016 |
PI3K/AKT | Contributes to the AKT-PIP3 interaction and enhances EGF-induced AKT kinase activity | Lin et al., 2017 | ||
MAYA | Majority of human solid tumors | Hippo-YAP | HER3-LLGL2-MAYA-NSUN6 complex methylates MST1 to activate YAP and target genes | Li et al., 2017 |
Lnc-DC | Dendritic cells | STAT3 | Promotes STAT3 phosphorylation | Zhong et al., 1999 |
NKILA | Normal breast epithelia or non-invasive breast tumors | NF-κB | Inhibits IKK-induced IκB phosphorylation to restrain NF-κB activity | Liu et al., 2015 |
ACOD1 | Most of the cells and organs | GOT2 metabolic pathway | Binds the metabolic enzyme GOT2 and enhances its catalytic activity | Wang et al., 2017 |
Lnc-Lsm3b | Immune cells and organs | IFN I | Binds to RIG-I and inhibits its activation to terminate type I IFN production | Jiang et al., 2018 |
HIF-1α: hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; HB-EGF: heparin-binding epidermal growth factor; EGFR: EGF receptor; GPNMB: glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; AKT: serine-threonine-protein kinase; STAT3: signal transducers and activators of transcription 3; NF-κB: nuclear factor-κB; IκB: inhibitor of NF-κB; IKK: IκB kinase; GOT2: glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase 2; IFN: interferon; RIG-I: retinoic acid-inducible gene I
The incidence and mortality of cancers, including lung cancer and breast cancer, have increased significantly recently and are expected to continue to rise in the coming decades. Thus, it will be extremely urgent to develop techniques for early diagnosis for efficient cancer treatment. Recently, lncRNAs, which are contributing to human pathogenesis, have attracted increased attention. LncRNAs have rapidly emerged as crucial regulators that interact with signaling pathways and control many cellular processes. The aberrant expression of lncRNAs has been shown to promote tumor progression in various types of cancers, including breast, liver, and kidney cancers, highlighting their therapeutic potential.
LncRNAs could interact with signaling molecules, and activate signaling pathways influencing tumor initiation and progression (Wang et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016, 2017; Li et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2017). The aberrant expression of lncRNAs in tumors and the related cancer signaling pathways have greatly impacted tumorigenesis in multiple types of cancers. Therefore, a better understanding of the function and molecular mechanism of lncRNAs will help us in not only identifying useful biomarkers for the diagnosis but also developing effective therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.
Footnotes
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81672791 and 81872300) and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (No. LR18C060002)
Contributors: Pei-fen FU, Xin ZHENG, and Xiao FAN wrote and edited the manuscript. Ai-fu LIN edited and checked the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethics guidelines: Pei-fen FU, Xin ZHENG, Xiao FAN, and Ai-fu LIN declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References
- 1.Altomare DA, Testa JR. Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene. 2005;24(50):7455–7464. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Angers S, Moon RT. Proximal events in Wnt signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(7):468–477. doi: 10.1038/nrm2717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Atala A. Re: lncRNA-dependent mechanisms of androgen-receptor-regulated gene activation programs. J Urol. 2014;191(5):1470–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Batista PJ, Chang HY. Long noncoding RNAs: cellular address codes in development and disease. Cell. 2013;152(6):1298–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Beyer TA, Weiss A, Khomchuk Y, et al. Switch enhancers interpret TGF-β and Hippo signaling to control cell fate in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep. 2013;5(6):1611–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheetham SW, Gruhl F, Mattick JS, et al. Long noncoding RNAs and the genetics of cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(12):2419–2425. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen DH, Sun YT, Wei YK, et al. LIFR is a breast cancer metastasis suppressor upstream of the Hippo-YAP pathway and a prognostic marker. Nat Med. 2012;18(10):1511–1517. doi: 10.1038/nm.2940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen Q, Zhang NL, Gray RS, et al. A temporal requirement for Hippo signaling in mammary gland differentiation, growth, and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2014;28(5):432–437. doi: 10.1101/gad.233676.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Citri A, Yarden Y. EGF-ERBB signalling: towards the systems level. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(7):505–516. doi: 10.1038/nrm1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cordenonsi M, Zanconato F, Azzolin L, et al. The Hippo transducer TAZ confers cancer stem cell-related traits on breast cancer cells. Cell. 2011;147(4):759–772. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Denko NC. Hypoxia, HIF1 and glucose metabolism in the solid tumour. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(9):705–713. doi: 10.1038/nrc2468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dong JX, Feldmann G, Huang JB, et al. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007;130(6):1120–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gibb EA, Brown CJ, Lam WL. The functional role of long non-coding RNA in human carcinomas. Mol Cancer, 10:38. 2011 doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guo YZ, Sun HH, Wang XT, et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals key lncRNAs associated with ribosomal biogenesis and epidermis differentiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2018;19(9):674–688. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1700319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gutschner T, Diederichs S. The hallmarks of cancer: a long non-coding RNA point of view. RNA Biol. 2012;9(6):703–719. doi: 10.4161/rna.20481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hadji F, Boulanger MC, Guay SP, et al. Altered DNA methylation of long noncoding RNA H19 in calcific aortic valve disease promotes mineralization by silencing NOTCH1. Circulation. 2016;134(23):1848–1862. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Halder G, Johnson RL. Hippo signaling: growth control and beyond. Development. 2011;138(1):9–22. doi: 10.1242/dev.045500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Harvey KF, Zhang XM, Thomas DM. The Hippo pathway and human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(4):246–257. doi: 10.1038/nrc3458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Haskins JW, Nguyen DX, Stern DF. Neuregulin 1-activated ERBB4 interacts with YAP to induce Hippo pathway target genes and promote cell migration. Sci Signal. 2014;7(355):ra116. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2005770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hirai H, Sootome H, Nakatsuru Y, et al. MK-2206, an allosteric Akt inhibitor, enhances antitumor efficacy by standard chemotherapeutic agents or molecular targeted drugs in vitro and in vivo . Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9(7):1956–1967. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jiang MH, Zhang SK, Yang ZH, et al. Self-recognition of an inducible host lncRNA by RIG-I feedback restricts innate immune response. Cell. 2018;173(4):906–919e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaelin WG, Jr, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;30(4):393–402. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Keith B, Johnson RS, Simon MC. HIF1α and HIF2α: sibling rivalry in hypoxic tumour growth and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;12(1):9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc3183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kuschel A, Simon P, Tug S. Functional regulation of HIF-1α under normoxia–is there more than post-translational regulation? J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(2):514–524. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li CL, Wang SY, Xing Z, et al. A ROR1-HER3-lncRNA signalling axis modulates the Hippo-YAP pathway to regulate bone metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(2):106–119. doi: 10.1038/ncb3464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lian I, Kim J, Okazawa H, et al. The role of YAP transcription coactivator in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes Dev. 2010;24(11):1106–1118. doi: 10.1101/gad.1903310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lin AF, Piao HL, Zhuang L, et al. FoxO transcription factors promote AKT Ser473 phosphorylation and renal tumor growth in response to pharmacologic inhibition of the PI3K-AKT pathway. Cancer Res. 2014;74(6):1682–1693. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lin AF, Yao J, Zhuang L, et al. The FoxO-BNIP3 axis exerts a unique regulation of mTORC1 and cell survival under energy stress. Oncogene. 2014;33(24):3183–3194. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lin AF, Li CL, Xing Z, et al. The LINK-A lncRNA activates normoxic HIF1α signalling in triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18(2):213–224. doi: 10.1038/ncb3295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lin AF, Hu QS, Li CL, et al. The LINK-A lncRNA interacts with PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to hyperactivate AKT and confer resistance to AKT inhibitors. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(3):238–251. doi: 10.1038/ncb3473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ling H, Spizzo R, Atlasi Y, et al. Ccat2, a novel noncoding RNA mapping to 8q24, underlies metastatic progression and chromosomal instability in colon cancer. Genome Res. 2013;23(9):1446–1461. doi: 10.1101/gr.152942.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu BD, Sun LJ, Liu Q, et al. A cytoplasmic NF-κB interacting long noncoding RNA blocks IκB phosphorylation and suppresses breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2015;27(3):370–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Luo J, Manning BD, Cantley LC. Targeting the PI3K-Akt pathway in human cancer: rationale and promise. Cancer Cell. 2003;4(4):257–262. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00248-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ma YX, Zhang JM, Wen LX, et al. Membrane-lipid associated lncRNA: a new regulator in cancer signaling. Cancer Lett. 2018;419:27–29. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mayer IA, Arteaga CL. The PI3K/AKT pathway as a target for cancer treatment. Ann Rev Med. 2016;67:11–28. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-062913-051343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Miah S, Martin A, Lukong KE. Constitutive activation of breast tumor kinase accelerates cell migration and tumor growth in vivo . Oncogenesis, 1:e11. 2012 doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2012.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ntziachristos P, Lim JS, Sage J, et al. From fly wings to targeted cancer therapies: a centennial for notch signaling. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(3):318–334. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Overholtzer M, Zhang JM, Smolen GA, et al. Transforming properties of YAP, a candidate oncogene on the chromosome 11q22 amplicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(33):12405–12410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605579103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pan DJ. The Hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev Cell. 2010;19(4):491–505. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pawson T, Warner N. Oncogenic re-wiring of cellular signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2007;26(9):1268–1275. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2009;136(4):629–641. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Prensner JR, Chinnaiyan AM. The emergence of lncRNAs in cancer biology. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(5):391–407. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Salah Z, Itzhaki E, Aqeilan RI. The ubiquitin E3 ligase ITCH enhances breast tumor progression by inhibiting the Hippo tumor suppressor pathway. Oncotarget. 2014;5(21):10886–10900. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sang LJ, Ju HQ, Liu GP, et al. LncRNA Camk-A regulates Ca2+-signaling-mediated tumor microenvironment remodeling. Mol Cell. 2018;72(1):71–83e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schwab LP, Peacock DL, Majumdar D, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α promotes primary tumor growth and tumor-initiating cell activity in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(1):R6. doi: 10.1186/bcr3087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Song QH, Mao BB, Cheng JB, et al. YAP enhances autophagic flux to promote breast cancer cell survival in response to nutrient deprivation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0120790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Talks KL, Turley H, Gatter KC, et al. The expression and distribution of the hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α in normal human tissues, cancers, and tumor-associated macrophages. Am J Pathol. 2000;157(2):411–421. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64554-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tano K, Akimitsu N. Long non-coding RNAs in cancer progression. Front Genet, 3:219. 2012 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vivanco I, Sawyers CL. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(7):489–501. doi: 10.1038/nrc839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang P, Xue YQ, Han YM, et al. The STAT3-binding long noncoding RNA lnc-DC controls human dendritic cell differentiation. Science. 2014;344(6181):310–313. doi: 10.1126/science.1251456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang P, Xu JF, Wang YJ, et al. An interferon-independent lncRNA promotes viral replication by modulating cellular metabolism. Science. 2017;358(6366):1051–1055. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang WQ, Huang J, Chen JJ. Angiomotin-like proteins associate with and negatively regulate YAP1. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(6):4364–4370. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C110.205401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang WQ, Huang J, Wang X, et al. PTPN14 is required for the density-dependent control of YAP1. Genes Dev. 2012;26(17):1959–1971. doi: 10.1101/gad.192955.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang YY, He L, Du Y, et al. The long noncoding RNA lncTCF7 promotes self-renewal of human liver cancer stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16(4):413–425. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wapinski O, Chang HY. Long noncoding RNAs and human disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21(6):354–361. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Xing Z, Lin AF, Li CL, et al. lncRNA directs cooperative epigenetic regulation downstream of chemokine signals. Cell. 2014;159(5):1110–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yan K, Tian J, Shi W, et al. LncRNA SNHG6 is associated with poor prognosis of gastric cancer and promotes cell proliferation and EMT through epigenetically silencing p27 and sponging miR-101-3p. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(3):999–1012. doi: 10.1159/000478682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yang GD, Lu XZ, Yuan LJ. LncRNA: a link between RNA and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1839(11):1097–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yu FX, Zhao B, Guan KL. Hippo pathway in organ size control, tissue homeostasis, and cancer. Cell. 2015;163(4):811–828. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhao B, Li L, Lei QY, et al. The Hippo-YAP pathway in organ size control and tumorigenesis: an updated version. Genes Dev. 2010;24(9):862–874. doi: 10.1101/gad.1909210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zheng X, Han H, Liu GP, et al. LncRNA wires up Hippo and hedgehog signaling to reprogramme glucose metabolism. EMBO J. 2017;36(22):3325–3335. doi: 10.15252/embj.201797609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhong H, de Marzo AM, Laughner E, et al. Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in common human cancers and their metastases. Cancer Res. 1999;59(22):5830–5835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhou X, Wang SY, Wang Z, et al. Estrogen regulates Hippo signaling via GPER in breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(5):2123–2135. doi: 10.1172/JCI79573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]