Abstract
Background
The guidelines recommend considering the BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in female patients with breast carcinomas. In this retrospective study, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in high-risk breast carcinoma patients in a Turkish population was investigated.
Materials and Methods
In high genetic risk breast carcinoma patients, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations were identified by applying next-generation sequencing.
Results
The results showed BRCA1/2 mutations in 19% of the total patients. In those with first-degree relatives with breast carcinoma histories, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was also 19%. In the patients younger than 40 years old, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 19.5%. In the triple-negative breast carcinoma patients younger than 60 years old, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 24.2%. In the patients younger than 40 years old with triple-negative breast carcinomas, BRCA1/2 mutation positivity was found in 37.5% of the patients. Overall, in the Turkish population, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence ranges from 19% to 37% in patients with high-risk breast carcinomas.
Conclusion
It is recommended to check for BRCA1/2 mutations in all high-risk breast carcinoma patients in the Turkish population.
1. Introduction
In individuals with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, the risk of breast and ovarian carcinoma development is very high. These are hereditary mutations [1, 2], and in people who have them, the risk of breast carcinoma development is 80%. The risk of ovarian carcinoma development in that population is 40% [1]. The breast carcinoma incidence increases in healthy women who have first-degree relatives with breast carcinomas. In particular, if the number of first-degree relatives with breast carcinomas is three or more, or if they are younger than 50 years old, the risk for developing a breast carcinoma is greatly increased [3].
In the healthy female population, the prevalence of BRCA mutation is around 2% [4] and in those with breast carcinoma histories in their families, the prevalence ranges from 9 to 21% [5–8]. In a Swedish study, BRCA1/2 mutations were found in 9% of the women who had first- or second-degree relatives with breast or ovarian carcinomas. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations occurred in 6.8% and 2.1% of the patients, respectively [5]. In a study performed in China, the BRCA mutation prevalence in the breast carcinoma patients was 3.5%; however, the prevalence was 9.1% in the patients with risk factors for breast carcinomas [6, 9, 10]. In the USA, in those with breast carcinoma histories in their families, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 12% [7]. In one study of Korean women with breast carcinoma histories in their families, the BRCA mutation prevalence was 21.7% (BRCA1 = 9.3% and BRCA2 = 12.4%) [8]. The BRCA mutation prevalence was found to be around 60% in an Ashkenazi Jewish population with ovarian carcinomas. In the patients with breast carcinomas, the BRCA mutation prevalence was 30% and 10% in the patients younger and older than 40 years old, respectively. Even in an Ashkenazi Jewish population without breast and ovarian carcinoma histories in their families, the BRCA mutation prevalence was 10% [11]. In Israel, the BRCA mutation prevalence in patients with ovarian carcinomas was 30%; however, the prevalence was 45% in the ovarian carcinoma patients with family histories. In an Ashkenazi Jewish population in Israel, the BRCA mutation prevalence was 34%, and in those with family histories, this prevalence increased to 55% [12]. Although Israeli Jews and Arabs live in the same region, the BRCA mutation frequency was 5.6% in the women with breast carcinomas in the Arab community [13]. In the Palestinian Arabs living in the same region, the BRCA mutation prevalence was below the world average [14].
In young patients with breast carcinomas, the BRCA mutation prevalence is higher, ranging from 5.9 to 23% [8, 13, 15–18]. In the British population, in patients with breast carcinomas who are younger than 36 years old, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 5.9% (BRCA1 = 3.5% and BRCA2 = 2.4%) [15]. In the French population, in breast carcinoma patients who are younger than 46 years old, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 9.1% (BRCA1 = 6.5% and BRCA2 = 2.6%) [16]. In the USA, in a population of young women under 35 years old, the total BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 9.4% (BRCA1 = 5.9% and BRCA2 = 3.5%). The prevalence was 12% (BRCA1 = 7.1% and BRCA2 = 4.9%) in women under 45 years old [17]. In Korea, in young breast carcinoma patients under 35 years old with no family histories, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 10% [8]. In the Arab community, in patients younger than 40 years old with breast carcinomas, the BRCA mutation prevalence was 10.8%; however, the prevalence was 5.1% in women between 40 and 50 years old [13]. One carcinoma center found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 23% (BRCA1 = 17% and BRCA2 = 6%) in breast carcinoma patients under 35 years old [18].
The BRCA mutation prevalence in patients with triple-negative breast carcinomas is very high [19–23]. In the Canadian population, in triple-negative breast carcinoma patients under 40 years of age, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 11% [19]. In the Greek population, in triple-negative breast carcinoma patients, BRCA1/2 mutations were found in 16% of the patients [20]. In the German and Austrian community, in triple-negative breast carcinoma patients, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 21% [21]. In women with triple-negative breast carcinomas in the Hispanic population, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 23% [22]. In triple-negative breast carcinoma cases in China, the BRCA mutation prevalence was 25% [23]. In the USA, in women with triple-negative breast carcinomas, BRCA mutations were found in almost one-third of the patients [24]. Overall, BRCA1 mutations were more prevalent in the triple-negative breast carcinoma cases, while BRCA2 mutations were more prevalent in the hormone-positive tumors [25].
2. Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective single-center study performed in the Medical Oncology Clinic of the Okmeydani Education and Research Hospital in Istanbul. Istanbul is Turkey's largest city, with approximately 15 million people living there. The Okmeydani Education and Research Hospital is the largest state hospital in Istanbul. The study data was obtained by screening the clinical files of the breast carcinoma patients who were treated between April 2013 and February 2017, and whose BRCA mutations were investigated.
The characteristics of the patients with high genetic risks were taken from the patient files. The high genetic risk breast cancer patients included those under 40 years old, those with triple-negative breast cancer and younger than 60 years old, those with breast cancer histories in first-degree relatives, those with both breast and ovarian cancer, and those with bilateral breast cancer.
The histological tumor types and hormone receptor states were recorded. The estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statuses were also recorded. The cases in which all of these were negative were considered to be triple-negative carcinomas. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were investigated using next-generation sequencing (NGS).
The BRCA1 (NG_005905.2 and NM_007294) and BRCA2 (NG_012772.3 and NM_000059) sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) were used as reference sequences. The NGS sequencing data were analyzed using SeqPilot software (JSI Medical Systems, Ettenheim, Germany).
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 15.0 for Windows was used for the statistical analysis. The number and percentage were used for the categorical variables, while the mean and standard deviation were used to define the numeric variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the independent groups because of the nonparametric distribution of the variables, and the chi-squared analysis was used to compare the ratios for the independent variables. The Monte Carlo simulation was applied in those cases in which the conditions were not met. The statistical significance level of alpha was accepted as p<0.05.
3. Results
A total of 99 patients were included in this study, and their average age was 45.6 years old (range = 27–82 years). Sixty-eight patients were premenopausal (68%) and 31 patients were postmenopausal (31%). In 21 (21.2%) patients, there were breast carcinoma histories in their first-degree relatives, and in 8 patients there were breast carcinoma histories in their second-degree relatives. In terms of the tumor localization, the breast carcinomas were localized in the right breast in 47 (47%) patients and in the left breast in 45 patients (45%), and they were bilateral in 7 (7%) patients. When the histological tumor type was considered, there were invasive ductal carcinomas in 86 patients, invasive lobular carcinomas in 10 patients, and other types in 3 patients. Regarding the characteristics of the receptors, 60 patients were ER positive and 39 were ER negative. The PR was positive in 53 patients and negative in 46 patients. In 10 patients, the HER2 positivity was 3+. Triple-negative tumors were found in 33 patients (Table 1).
Table 1.
The characteristics of the patients.
| Characteristics | n | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Menopause Status | Premenopause | 68 | 68 |
| Postmenopause | 31 | 31 | |
|
| |||
| Family History | First-degree relative | 21 | 21.2 |
| Second-degree relative | 8 | 8.08 | |
|
| |||
| Tumor Localization | Right | 47 | 47 |
| Left | 45 | 45 | |
| Bilateral | 7 | 7 | |
|
| |||
| Tumor Histology | Invasive ductal carcinoma | 86 | 86 |
| Invasive lobular carcinoma | 10 | 10 | |
| Others | 3 | 3 | |
|
| |||
| Receptor Status | ER positive | 60 | 60 |
| ER negative | 39 | 39 | |
| PR positive | 53 | 53 | |
| PR negative | 46 | 46 | |
| HER2 positive | 10 | 10 | |
| HER2 negative | 89 | 89 | |
| Triple-negative | 33 | 33 | |
|
| |||
| High Risk Factors | First-degree relative | 21 | 21 |
| Bilateral carcinoma | 7 | 7 | |
| Breast + Ovarian carcinoma | 7 | 7 | |
| Triple-negative | 33 | 33 | |
| Below 40 years old | 41 | 41 | |
Twenty-one patients had first-degree relatives with breast carcinomas. Seven patients had bilateral breast carcinomas, and 7 patients had ovarian carcinomas in addition to breast carcinomas. Thirty-three of the patients under 60 years of age exhibited triple-negative features. Forty-one patients were under 40 years of age (Table 1).
BRCA1/2 positivity was found in a total of 19 patients (19%) (Table 2). Eleven patients (11%) had BRCA1 positivity and 8 patients (8%) had BRCA2 positivity. The average ages of the patients with and without BRCA1/2 positivity were 43.7 years old (range = 27–63 years) and 46.0 years old (range = 28–82 years), respectively (Table 2) (p value). Among the 21 patients with breast carcinoma histories in first-degree relatives, 4 (19%) patients had BRCA1/2 positivity. BRCA1 positivity was detected in 2 (9.5%) patients and BRCA2 positivity was detected in 2 (9.5%) patients (Table 2). Among the 8 patients with breast carcinomas in second-degree relatives, only 1 patient (12.5%) had a BRCA1 mutation (Table 2). Among the 7 patients with bilateral breast carcinomas, only 1 (14%) patient exhibited BRCA1/2 positivity. Among the 7 patients with both breast and ovarian carcinomas, only 3 patients (42.8%) exhibited BRCA1/2 positivity (Table 2). Two of those patients (28.5%) were BRCA1 positive and 1 (14.2%) patient was BRCA2 positive. Among the 33 patients under 60 years of age with triple-negative features, 8 (24.2%) had BRCA1/2 positivity. Among these patients, BRCA1 positivity was detected in 6 (18.1%) patients and BRCA2 positivity was detected in 2 (6.0%) patients (Table 2). In the patients under 40 years of age (n=41), 8 (19.5%) exhibited BRCA1/2 positivity. Among these patients, both the BRCA1 positivity and the BRCA2 positivity were detected in 4 patients (9.75%) (Table 2). Eight of the patients (8%) under 40 years of age showed triple negativity. Among these patients, 3 (37.5%) exhibited BRCA1/2 positivity, 2 (25%) showed BRCA1 positivity, and 1 (12.5%) showed BRCA2 positivity (Table 2).
Table 2.
The characteristics of the groups.
| Characteristics | n | BRCA1/BRCA2 | BRCA1 | BRCA2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | p | Negative | Positive | p | ||
| Age [mean (min-max)] | 46 (28-82) | 43.7 (27-63) | 45.7 | 45.5 | 0.781 | 46.0 | 41.4 | 0.190 | |
| Germline mutation | 81 (81%) | 19 (19%) | 88 (88%) | 11 (11%) | 91 (91%) | 8 (8%) | |||
| Family History | 21 | 17 (81%) | 4 (19%) | 19 (90.5%) | 2 (9.5%) | 1.000 | 19 (90.5%) | 2 (9. 5%) | 1.000 |
| Bilateral breast carcinoma | 7 | 6 (86%) | 1 (14%) | 7 | 0 | 0.351 | 6 (86%) | 1 (14%) | 1.000 |
| Breast + ovarian carcinoma | 7 | 4 (67.2%) | 3 (42.8%) | 5 (71.5%) | 2 (28.5%) | 0.173 | 6 (85.8%) | 1 (14.2%) | 0.456 |
| Triple-negative tumor | 33 | 25 (75.7%) | 8 (24.2%) | 27 (81.8%) | 6 (18.1%) | 0.172 | 31 (93.9%) | 2 (6.0%) | 0.715 |
| Below 40 years old | 41 | 33 (80.4%) | 8 (19.5%) | 37 (90.2%) | 4 (9.5%) | 1.000 | 37 (90.2%) | 4 (9.5%) | 0.715 |
| Triple negative + below 40 years old | 8 | 5 (62.5%) | 3 (37.5%) | 6 (75%) | 2 (25%) | 7 (87.5%) | 1 (12.5%) | ||
| ER Positive | 60 | 51 (85%) | 9 (15%) | 56 (93.3%) | 4 (6.6%) | 0.316 | 55 (91.6%) | 5 (8.33%) | 0.824 |
| ER Negative | 39 | 29 (74.3%) | 10 (25%) | 32 (82%) | 7 (17.9%) | 36 (92.3%) | 3 (7.6%) | ||
| PR Positive | 53 | 45 (84.9%) | 8 (15%) | 49 (92.4%) | 4 (7.5%) | 0.526 | 49 (92.4%) | 4 (7.5%) | 1.000 |
| PR Negative | 46 | 35 (76%) | 11 (23.9%) | 39 (84.7%) | 7 (15.2%) | 42 (91.3%) | 4 (8.6%) | ||
| HER 2 Positive | 10 | 10 (100%) | 0 | 10 (100%) | 0 | 0.650 | 10 (100%) | 0 | 1.000 |
| Right Breast | 47 | 36 (76.5%) | 11 (23.4%) | 39 (82.9%) | 8 (17%) | 0.262 | 44 (93.6%) | 3 (6.3%) | 0.710 |
| Left Breast | 45 | 37 (82.2%) | 8 (17.7%) | 42 (93.3%) | 3 (6.6%) | 40 (88.8%) | 5 (11.1%) | ||
| Invasive Ductal Carcinoma | 86 | 69 (80%) | 17 (19%) | 75 (87%) | 11 (12%) | 0.351 | 80 (93%) | 6 (6.9%) | 0.245 |
| Invasive Lobular Carcinoma | 10 | 9 (90%) | 1 (10%) | 10 | 0 | 0.596 | 9 (90%) | 1 (10%) | 0.583 |
Among the 60 patients with ER positivity, 9 (15%) exhibited BRCA1/2 positivity. Among the 39 patients with ER negativity, 10 (25.6%) exhibited BRCA1/2 positivity. Among the 60 patients with ER positivity, 4 (6.6%) were BRCA1 positive, while 5 (8.33%) were BRCA2 positive. There was BRCA1 positivity in 7 (17.9%) of the 39 ER negative patients, while there was BRCA2 positivity in 3 (7.6%) of the patients. Among the 53 PR positive patients, 8 (15%) had BRCA1/2 positivity. Among the 46 patients with PR negativity, 11 (23.9%) had BRCA1/2 positivity. Among the 53 patients with PR positivity, positivity in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 was detected in 4 patients (7.5%) for each mutation. Among the 46 PR negative patients, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 were positive in 7 patients (15.2 %) and 4 patients (8.6%), respectively. Among a total of 99 patients, the HER2 was 3+ in 10 patients; however, none exhibited BRCA1/2 positivity.
In those patients with right breast carcinomas, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 were positive in 8 patients (72.7%) and 3 patients (37.5%), respectively. Among the 8 patients with left breast carcinomas, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 were positive in 3 patients (27.2%) and 5 patients (62.5%), respectively.
Regarding the 11 patients with BRCA1 mutations, 8 patients (72.9%) were in the premenopausal period and 3 patients (27.2%) were in the postmenopausal period. Among the 8 patients with BRCA2 mutations, 6 patients (25%) were in the premenopausal period and 2 patients were in the postmenopausal period.
With regard to the histological tumor subtypes, of the 86 with invasive ductal carcinomas, 11 patients exhibited BRCA1 positivity and 6 patients exhibited BRCA2 positivity. Among the 10 patients with invasive lobular carcinomas, BRCA2 positivity was detected in only 1 patient. In the other histological subtypes, only 1 patient exhibited BRCA2 positivity.
The age difference between the patients with concomitant breast and ovarian cancer (59.3 years old) and the other patients with breast cancer (44.5 years old) was statistically significant (p=0.007). That is, breast and ovarian carcinomas tended to coexist in the older ages. Five of the 7 patients were in the postmenopausal period, and 2 patients were in the premenopausal period; this difference was statistically significant (p=0.02). This finding showed that the patients with concomitant breast and ovarian carcinomas were frequently in the postmenopausal period.
In the patients under 60 years of age with triple-negative tumors, the tumor was in the right breast in 12 patients and in the left breast in 21 patients. The triple-negative cases were detected significantly more frequently in the left breast (p=0.01). The mean Ki-67 value (52%) in the triple-negative patients was significantly higher than the mean Ki-67 value (30%) in the other patients (p=0.002).
The average age of the 41 patients younger than 40 years old was 35.7 years old, and 97.6% of these patients were in the premenopausal period. The frequency of a breast carcinoma history in a first-degree relative of these patients under 40 years of age was statistically significantly higher than in the other patients (p=0.024).
The mean age of the patients with bilateral breast carcinomas (51.3 years old) was significantly higher than the mean age of the patients (44.8 years old) without bilateral breast carcinomas (p=0.025). All 7 patients with bilateral breast carcinomas were HER2-negative (p=0.045).
A total of 14 mutation types were identified in the BRCA mutation-positive patients, and the names of the mutations are given in Table 3.
Table 3.
Characteristics of BRCA positive patients.
| Patients | Age | ER | PR | CerbB2 | 1st degree relative breast cancer | Bilateral breast cancer | Both ovarian and breast cancers | BRCA1 mutation | BRCA 2 mutation | BRCA mutations found |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4. | 34 | negative | negative | negative | - | - | - | positive | - | p.R1203 (c.3607C>T) |
| 8.h.g | 38 | negative | negative | negative | - | - | - | positive | - | p.S1613G (c.4837A>G) |
| 10.r.i | 36 | positive | positive | negative | - | - | - | - | positive | c.9413dupT |
| 11.s.ö | 40 | negative | negative | negative | Positive | - | - | positive | - | p.R1203 (c.3607c>T) |
| 12.n.t | 60 | negative | negative | negative | Positive | - | positive | - | positive | IVS2 +1G>A (c.67+1G>A) |
| 13.e.e | 63 | negative | negative | negative | - | - | positive | - | positive | IVS2 +1G>A (c.67+1G>A) |
| 15.n.a | 38 | negative | negative | negative | - | - | - | - | positive | c.9413dupT |
| 21.h. s | 47 | negative | negative | negative | - | - | - | positive | - | IVS18 +66G>A |
| (c.5152+66g>A) | ||||||||||
| 26.u.d | 53 | negative | negative | negative | - | - | - | positive | - | p.Q356 (c1067A>G) |
| 27.m.a | 54 | negative | negative | negative | - | - | - | positive | - | p.S1613G(c.4837A>G |
| 44.e.e | 43 | negative | negative | negative | Positive | - | - | - | positive | c.771_775deTCAA |
| 49.g.t | 51 | positive | positive | negative | Positive | - | - | positive | - | IVS7 -34C>T (c.442-34C>T) |
| 59.d.a | 50 | positive | positive | - | - | positive | positive | - | p.W1815 (c.5444G>A) | |
| 61.b.b | 54 | positive | positive | Negative | - | - | positive | positive | - | p.L1209lfs 10 (c.3624dupA) |
| 63.f.s | 41 | negative | negative | negative | - | - | positive | positive | - | p.W1815 (c.5444G>A) |
| 64.z.e | 27 | positive | positive | negative | - | - | - | - | positive | c.7487dupA |
| 68.n.k | 31 | positive | positive | negative | - | - | - | - | positive | p.S1106R (c.3318C>G) |
| 69.ç.g | 32 | positive | negative | negative | - | - | - | - | positive | P.W3106X(c.9317G>A) |
| 85.d.t | 38 | positive | positive | negative | - | positive | - | positive | - | p.L1209lfs 10 (c.3624dupA) |
4. Discussion
In previous population-based studies, the BRCA1/2 prevalence was found to be around 2–3.5% [6, 7]. However, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence is around 10% in the Ashkenazi Jewish population without a relative with a breast or ovarian carcinoma [11]. The BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence is higher in young patients, patients with first-degree relatives with breast or ovarian carcinomas, patients with triple-negative carcinomas, patients with bilateral carcinomas, patients with concomitant breast and ovarian carcinomas, and high genetic risk patients [5, 8, 12, 15, 17, 19–21, 24]. In most studies, the mutation rates were evaluated separately in the subgroups in which the risks of BRCA1/2 mutations were high. To our knowledge, in no study has the mutation prevalence been given based on all of these high-risk factors. In our study, we took into account all of these risk factors, and we evaluated them collectively by investigating the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in the patients with these risk factors. In these high-risk patients, we determined a total BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 19%, with a BRCA1 mutation prevalence of 11% and BRCA2 mutation prevalence of 8%.
Walsh et al. found a BRCA1/2 prevalence of 11% in those individuals with breast carcinoma histories in their families [7]. In Sweden, Loman et al. found a BRCA1/2 prevalence of 9% in those individuals with breast and ovarian carcinoma histories in their families [5]. In Korea, Han et al. found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 21.7% in those individuals with breast carcinoma family histories [8]. In a study from Israel, the BRCA mutation prevalence in patients with ovarian carcinomas was 30%, with a rate increase to 45% in those patients with family histories [26]. In the Ashkenazi Jewish population in Israel, the mutation prevalence was 34%, which increased to 55% in those having family histories [11, 12]. In a study of the Azerbaijani Turkish population living in Iran, Nahid et al. found a BRCA2 mutation prevalence of 10% in breast carcinoma patients [27]. Moreover, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in the Turkish population was reported as 14% [28]. In our study, the BRCA1/2 positivity was 19% in the breast carcinoma patients with first-degree relatives having breast carcinoma histories. In these patients, the BRCA1 positivity was 9.5% and the BRCA2 positivity was 9.5%. In the patients with breast carcinoma histories in their second-degree relatives, the BRCA1 mutation prevalence was 12.5%. This prevalence (19%) was higher than the prevalence of 9–11% found in Europe and America, but similar to the 21% found in Asia. Although the Turkish and Israeli populations are in neighboring countries in the middle of Asia, the BRCA1/2 positivity was 19% in the Turkish population with breast carcinoma family histories, which was quite low when compared to the BRCA1/2 positivity prevalence of 45% seen in those with positive family histories in Israel.
The BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in women with breast carcinomas is higher in patients under 40 years of age [8, 13, 15–18]. Malone et al., in their study conducted in the USA, found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 12% in women under 45 years of age [17]. Bayraktar et al. found BRCA1/2 mutations in 23% of the breast carcinoma patients under 35 years of age, according to the Anderson Carcinoma Center data [18]. Peto et al. found a BRCA1/2 mutation positivity prevalence of 5.6% in women with breast carcinomas under the age of 36 years old in the UK [15]. In France, Bonadona et al. found a BRCA1/2 positivity prevalence of 9.1% in women with breast carcinomas under the age of 46 years old [16]. El Saghir et al. found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 10.8% in patients with breast carcinomas under the age of 40 years old in an Arabic population [13]. In Korea, Han et al. found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 10% in young breast carcinoma patients under the age of 35 years old [8]. In our study, we found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 19.5% (BRCA1 = 9.75% and BRCA2 = 9.75%) in breast carcinoma patients under the age of 40 years old. This prevalence of 19.5% seems to be about double the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in the literature mentioned above. However, the prevalence found in this study was not found in a population-based study, and our prevalence rate belongs to a population with high-risk factors. Thus, in patients with breast carcinomas who are younger than 40 years old with genetic risk factors, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 19.5%.
Another subgroup in which BRCA1/2 mutations are frequently seen is women with triple-negative breast carcinomas [19–23]. In Germany and Austria, Muendlein et al. found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 21% in women with breast carcinomas showing triple-negative features [21]. Fostira et al. found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 16% in a Greek population of women with breast carcinomas showing triple-negative features [20]. In a Hispanic population, Villarreal et al. found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 23% in women with breast carcinomas showing triple-negative features [22, 29]. Li et al. found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 25% in women with breast carcinomas showing triple-negative features in a Chinese population [23]. In our study, we found a BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence of 24.2% in the patients with breast carcinomas showing triple-negative features. Our prevalence shows similarities with the above-mentioned prevalence of 20–25% registered in the literature. Overall, BRCA1/2 mutations are frequently seen in young women and women with breast carcinomas showing triple-negative features. In our study, there was a prevalence of 37.5% in the women with breast carcinomas showing triple-negative features under the age of 40 years old.
Krammer et al. found mostly BRCA1 mutations in those patients who showed triple-negative features and mostly BRCA2 mutations in the hormone-positive patients [25]. In our study, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 positivity prevalence was 6.6% and 8.3% in the patients with ER positivity, respectively. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 positivity prevalence was 17.9% and 7.6% in those patients with ER negativity, respectively. Our findings contribute to the research of Krammer et al. who argued that the BRCA1 mutation is more frequently seen in triple-negative patients.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, in the Turkish population, the total BRCA1/2 mutation positivity prevalence was 19% in the patients with high-risk breast carcinomas. The BRCA1/2 mutation positivity prevalence was also 19% in the patients with breast carcinoma histories in their first-degree relatives. In the patients under 40 years old, the BRCA1/2 mutation positivity prevalence was 19.5%, and in the patients under 60 years old with triple-negative breast carcinomas, the BRCA1/2 mutation positivity prevalence was 24.2%. In the women with breast carcinomas showing triple-negative features under the age of 40 years old, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 37.5%. This shows that, as in other Turkish populations, the BRCA1/2 mutation frequency in women with high-risk breast carcinomas increases from 19% to 37%. In the Turkish population, all high-risk breast carcinoma patients should absolutely be evaluated in terms of BRCA1/2 mutations.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.King M., Marks J. H., Mandell J. B. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science. 2003;302(5645):643–646. doi: 10.1126/science.1088759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Antoniou A. C., Pharoah P. D. P., Narod S., et al. Breast and ovarian cancer risks to carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC and 185delAG and BRCA2 6174delT mutations: A combined analysis of 22 population based studies. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2005;42(7):602–603. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Janowsky E. C. Review: Breast cancer is associated with a family history of the disease in first-degree relatives. ACP journal club. 2002;136(3):p. 115. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2002-136-3-115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group. Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. British Journal of Cancer. 2000;83(10):1301–1308. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Loman N., Johannsson O., Kristoffersson U., Olsson H., Borg Å. Family history of breast and ovarian cancers and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of early-onset breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2001;93(16):1215–1223. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.16.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lang G.-T., Shi J.-X., Hu X., et al. The spectrum of BRCA mutations and characteristics of BRCA-associated breast cancers in China: Screening of 2,991 patients and 1,043 controls by next-generation sequencing. International Journal of Cancer. 2017;141(1):129–142. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walsh T., Casadei S., Coats K. H., et al. Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006;295(12):1379–1388. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.12.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Han S.-A., Kim S.-W., Kang E., et al. The prevalence of BRCA mutations among familial breast cancer patients in Korea: Results of the Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study. Familial Cancer. 2013;12(1):75–81. doi: 10.1007/s10689-012-9578-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nikopoulos K., Venselaar H., Collin R. W. J., et al. Overview of the mutation spectrum in familial exudative vitreoretinopathy and Norrie disease with identification of 21 novel variants in FZD4, LRP5, and NDP. Human Mutation. 2010;31(6):656–666. doi: 10.1002/humu.21250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang J., Pei R., Pang Z., et al. Prevalence and characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Chinese women with familial breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2012;132(2):421–428. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1596-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abeliovich D., Kaduri L., Lerer I., et al. The founder mutations 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2 appear in 60% of ovarian cancer and 30% of early-onset breast cancer patients among Ashkenazi women. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1997;60(3):505–514. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hirsh-Yechezkel G., Chetrit A., Lubin F., et al. Population attributes affecting the prevalence of BRCA mutation carriers in epithelial ovarian cancer cases in Israel. Gynecologic Oncology. 2003;89(3):494–498. doi: 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00152-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.El Saghir N. S., Zgheib N. K., Assi H. A., et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ethnic lebanese Arab womenwith high hereditary risk breast cancer. The Oncologist. 2015;20(4):357–364. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kadouri L., Bercovich D., Elimelech A., et al. A novel BRCA-1 mutation in Arab kindred from east Jerusalem with breast and ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2007;7(14) doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peto J., Collins N., Barfoot R., et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early- onset breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1999;91(11):943–949. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.11.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bonadona V., Sinilnikova O. M., Chopin S., et al. Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations to the incidence of breast cancer in young women: Results from a prospective population-based study in France. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer. 2005;43(4):404–413. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Malone K. E., Daling J. R., Neal C., et al. Frequency of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in a population-based sample of young breast carcinoma cases. Cancer. 2000;88(6):1393–1402. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000315)88:6<1393::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-P. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000315)88:6<1393::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bayraktar S., Amendola L., Gutierrez-Barrera A. M., et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancer in BRCA-carriers and non-carriers in women 35 years of age or less. The Breast. 2014;23(6):770–774. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Young S. R., Pilarski R. T., Donenberg T., et al. The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9, article 86 doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fostira F., Tsitlaidou M., Papadimitriou C., et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among 403 women with triple-negative breast cancer: Implications for genetic screening selection criteria: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2012;134(1):353–362. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Muendlein A., Rohde B. H., Gasser K., et al. Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2015;141(11):2005–2012. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Villarreal-Garza C., Weitzel J. N., Llacuachaqui M., et al. The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among young Mexican women with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2015;150(2):389–394. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3312-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li Y. T., Ni D., Yang L., Zhao Q., Ou J. H. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations of triple-negative breast cancer patients in Xinjiang multiple ethnic region of China. European Journal of Medical Research. 2014;19(1, article no. 35) doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-19-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Peshkin B. N., Alabek M. L., Isaacs C. BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers. Breast Disease. 2010;32(1-2):25–33. doi: 10.3233/BD-2010-0306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Krammer J., Pinker-Domenig K., Robson M. E., et al. Breast cancer detection and tumor characteristics in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2017;163(3):565–571. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4198-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Helpman L., Zidan O., Friedman E., et al. Young israeli women with epithelial ovarian cancer: Prevalence of BRCA mutations and clinical correlates. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2017;28(5):p. e61. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fathi K. N., Khaniani S. M., Montazeri V., Derakhshan M. S. Minor role of BRCA2 mutation (Exon2 and Exon11) in patients with early-onset breast cancer amongst Iranian Azeri-Turkish women. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2014;17(2):108–111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cecener G., Egeli U., Tunca B., et al. BRCA1/2 germline mutations and their clinical importance in Turkish breast cancer patients. Cancer Investigation. 2014;32(8):375–387. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2014.919302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Villarreal-Garza C., Alvarez-Gómez R. M., Pérez-Plasencia C., et al. Significant clinical impact of recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Mexico. Cancer. 2015;121(3):372–378. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.