Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Apr 22;26(14):1410–1415. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.783810

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: new insights into its pathogenesis

Annarosa Floreani 1, Diego Caroli 1, Roberta Lazzari 1, Alessia Memmo 2, Elisa Vidali 2, Davide Colavito 3, Antonello D’ Arrigo 3, Alberta Leon 3, Roberto Romero 4,5, Maria Teresa Gervasi 2
PMCID: PMC6333085  NIHMSID: NIHMS1003074  PMID: 23480690

Abstract

Aim:

To search a specific gene expression profile in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) and to evaluate the maternal and foetal outcome.

Methods:

We consecutively enrolled 12 women with ICP and 12 healthy pregnant controls. The gene expression profile was assayed with the microarray technique including a panel of 5541 human genes. Microarray data were validated by real-time PCR technique.

Results:

Caesarean delivery was performed in eight patients with ICP versus three controls (p = 0.05). ICP women delivered at earlier gestational age than control (p < 0.001). Foetal distress was recorded in two babies, but we failed to find any correlation between bile salt concentration and foetal distress. Twenty genes potentially correlated with ICP were found differentially expressed (p < 0.05). Among these, three belong to genetic classes involved in pathogenic mechanisms of ICP: (1) pathophysiology of pruritus (GABRA2, cases versus controls = 2, upregulated gene); (2) lipid metabolism and bile composition (HLPT, cases versus controls = 0.6, down-regulated gene); and (3) protein trafficking and cytoskeleton arrangement (KIFC3, cases versus controls = 0.5, down-regulated gene).

Conclusions:

Different gene expression may contribute to the complex pathogenesis of ICP. An upregulation of GABRA2 receptor may indicate that GABA may play a role in the pathogenesis of pruritus in this condition.

Keywords: Genetics, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, microarray

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a peculiar hepatic disorder in pregnancy, which usually occurs at the last trimester [1]. It is characterized by severe pruritus enough to affect quality of life, associated with an increase in serum bile acids and transaminases [1]. The incidence of ICP ranges between 0.5% and 1.8% of pregnancies in Europe, but the highest peak of incidence has been reported in Chile (up to 28% in the Araucanic population) and in Scandinavia [2]. This geographical distribution clearly indicates a genetic predisposition. The MDR3 gene was first reported to be involved in ICP by De Vree et al. [3]. In a large consanguineous family, subjects affected by PFIC3 were heterozygous for a nonsense mutation in exon 23 (R957X) and women affected by ICP were heterozygous. Subsequently, other heterozygous mutations in MDR3 gene have been reported in affected women with a wide variability according to the geographical area [47]. Recently, we performed two multicentre prospective case-control studies in Italy, enrolling 96 women with ICP. At overall, an association with MDR3 variant was present in 7% of cases only [8,9]. Therefore, the involvement of different pathogenic genes in this condition may be suggested.

The ABCB11 gene coding for bile salt export pump (BSEP) is another gene implicated in the development of ICP [10]. In contrast to MDR3, evidence for a pathogenic involvement of hereditary BSEP mutations in ICP is controversial. While high GGT values were present in the majority of ICP patients with MDR3 mutations, BSEP mutations were postulated in low GGT cases [11,12].

A study by Savander et al. [6] in individuals from Finnish ICP families could not find any association between ICP and BSEP noted mutations, which was in-line with another recent study that did not find any evidence of a strong role for BSEP in the pathogenesis of ICP [13]. It is possible, however, that combined variants of MDR3 and BSEP may cause a severe phenotypic expression of ICP [14].

Till now, the genetic studies on ICP have been performed with the association study protocol of candidate genes. However, association-based studies carry several bias, particularly the sample size, the lack of independent replication in different populations, the complex variability of phenotypes, the penetrance, and environmental factors. Microarray technology provides a powerful tool to assay differential expression of gene products [15] for microarray analysis of gene expression. In fact, the simultaneous expression of thousands of transcripts allows the demonstration of gene expression patterns associated with this condition.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of possible genes involved in the multifactorial pathogenesis of ICP using the microarray technology.

Material and Methods

Patients

Twelve consecutive pregnant women diagnosed as affected by ICP and 12 age-matched controls (pregnant women without ICP) were enrolled in the study.

The diagnostic criteria were as follows: (1) pruritus; (2) high total bile acid concentration and serum transaminases values; (3) absence of viral infections (hepatitis A virus [HAV], hepatitis B virus [HBV], hepatitis C virus [HCV], cytomegalovirus); (4) negativity for markers of autoimmunity (organ- and non-organ-specific autoantibodies, i.e. thyroid autoantibodies, nuclear, smooth muscle, mitochondrial, liver-kidney microsomal autoantibodies); (5) no extrahepatic causes of pruritus (allergies, thyroid dysfunction); and (6) normalization of pruritus and liver function tests after delivery.

The control group included 12 pregnant women without ICP, with a mean age of 32 ± 3.1 years, normal function tests and matched for parity, trimester of pregnancy, age and geographical region.

This investigation was conducted after the approval of the local Ethical Committee, and informed consent was obtained by each subject.

Microarray procedures

Six milliliters of peripheral blood were collected from each subject and frozen at −80° C until utilized. Duplicated arrays comprising 5541 humancDNAs were assembled onto mirrored, aminosilane-coated slides (Amplislide, GeneWave, Paris, France) by a Lucidea Spotter (GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy).

Total RNA was extracted using a TRIzol-chlorophorm method (Bibco, St Louis, MO). RNAwas resuspended in water (E.E.P.C.) and its integrity was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Noventa Padovana, Italy).

A dendrimer-based labelling system (Array-50 version 2; Genisphere Inc., Hatfield, PA, USA) was used for the mRNA reverse transcription, preparation of cDNA probes and slide hybridization. Briefly, 10 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using 5ʹ tagged oligo (dt) primers and murine leukemia virus (MLV) reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The tagged cDNAwas hybridized for 16 h at 50° C in a humidified chamber, followed by sequential slide washing as follows: 2 × saline sodium citrate (SSC) + 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) at 50° C, 2 × SSC at room temperature, and 0.2 × SSC at room temperature (10 min per washing step). At the end, the slides were incubated with DNA dendrimers containing cyanine dyes and including sequences complementary to the cDNAtags. The slides were scanned by a Generation III Laser Scanner (Amersham-Pharmacia, Molecular Dynamics). For image visualization and signal quantification, an Array Vision software was utilized (Imaging Research, St. Catharine, ON, Canada).

Data analysis

For statistical analysis, the Genespring software was employed (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Data were normalized by LOWESS [16], baseline transformed for between-slide normalization and then filtered on the basis of their signal intensity: only spot values above background in both duplicate arrays were considered for further analysis. Data were analyzed by Welch t test, setting the p value threshold at 0.05. The p values were corrected by Bonferroni post hoc test.

Real-time PCR

To validate microarray data, real-time (RT) PCR was used to detect the expression of randomly selected genes in the same RNA samples used for microarray. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed in duplicate using the SYBR Green I assay on ABI PRISM Step One Plus (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in a total volumes of 10 μl containing 5 μl of 2 × SYBR green master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 5 μM gene-specific forward and reverse primers (MWG Operon) and 10 ng cDNA.

The following thermal cycling protocol was used: 10 min at 95° C followed by 45 cycles of 15 s at 95° C and 30 s at 60° C. DNA amplification was verified by melt curve analysis. The threshold fluorescence was set within the exponential range of the amplification curve and used to calculate the threshold cycle (Ct) values. Ct values were normalized for the housekeeping gene, porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD).

The following primers were used for selected genes: SYT7, forward 5ʹ-TCAAAGCCATGGACATCGG-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-TCCTCTTCATCGTCACCGTCTT-3ʹ; GABRA2, forward 5ʹ-TGTCCTCTGAAATTTGGCAGCT-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-GATTGGCCCAGCAGGTCA-3ʹ; PFKP, forward 5ʹ-ATGGCTTTGACGGCTTCG-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-CGTTTTGTCCCAAGAATGG-3ʹ; PLTP, forward 5ʹ-TGCGCAGGTTCCGAATCTA-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-ATCACCCCAATCTGCAGC-3ʹ; KIFC3, forward 5ʹ-TGCGGCTGAAAGGGAACA-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-GGCATCGAAAGTCACAGCATT-3ʹ; AKAP10, forward 5ʹ-GGCTTTTTGTCCAGCAATCT-3ʹ; reverse 5ʹ-GAGCAGTCAGCGACACGTTC-3ʹ; BFAR, forward 5ʹ-TAGCTCCTAACACAGGCCGAG-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-TAGACGAGCAGGACCACTGC-3ʹ; SNAPC4, forward 5ʹ-GATCTACCGATGGACCAAGAGC-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-CCCCGTATTTGGCAACAGC-3ʹ; PBGD, forward 5ʹ-GAACAGAGCAAAGGAAGCGC-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-TGGAACATTGCGACAGTGGA-3ʹ. The expression of detected genes was calculated by Welch’s t test, and p values of < 0.05 were regarded as significant.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of subjects

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of ICP women were reported in Table 1. ICP women had high total bile acid concentration and elevated serum transaminases values in accordance with diagnostic criteria, while levels of total bilirubin and gamma glutamyl transferase were normal and comparable with the control group. Only one woman had family history of ICP.

Table 1.

Clinical details of the patients with ICP

Points Age
(years)
Parity Family history
of ICP
Peak of AST
IU/L
Peak of ALT
IU/L
Peak of GGT
IU/L
Peak of
total bilirubin
(mmol/L)
Peak of
bile salts
(μmol/L)
1 45 0000 Yes 43 60 9 9.6 100
2 29 0001 No 481 470 35 15.4 100
3 33 0001 No 58 122 13 8.8 27.5
4 34 0000 No 74 70 15 9.9 10
5 38 0001 No 542 584 27 13.8 32
6 24 0000 No 50 74 13 12.8 32
7 35 0000 No 484 600 27 13.4 41
8 39 0001 No 80 103 31 7.4 10
9 25 0000 No 80 113 22 20.6 16.7
10 34 0000 No 143 369 17 6.4 34.4
11 28 0001 No 80 234 9 7.7 10
12 35 0000 No 201 291 29 16.4 100
Total
n = 12
Mean ± SD 33 ± 6 188.8 ± 195.3 250.5 ± 202 21.3 ± 7.6 11.7 ± 4.5 42.8 ± 36

Normal value: AST: <40 IU/L; ALT: <45 UI/L; GGT: <65 UI/L; total bilirubin: <17 mmol/L; bile salts: <6 μmol/L.

Pregnancy outcome of ICP was presented in Table 2. Caesarean delivery was performed in eight patients with ICP versus three controls (67% versus 25%, p = 0.05). ICP women delivered at earlier gestational age than control (37.5 ± 1.44 versus 40.60 ± 0.97; p < 0.001). Weight at birth was similar in ICP group with respect to controls (3040 ± 563 versus 3425 ± 521 g, p = n.s.). Neonatal intensive care was required in one baby in the study group, but no obstetric problems were recorded in the controls. Overall, foetal distress was recorded in two babies, but we failed to find any correlation between bile salt concentration and foetal distress.

Table 2.

Outcome of pregnancy of the patients with ICP

Points Delivery Week of
delivery
Neonatal
gender
Neonatal
weight (g)
Fetal
distress
Meconium-stained
AF
AF Color Apgar 1ʹ Apgar 5ʹ NICU
1 C 37.6 F 3.700 No No Clear 9 10 0
2 C 36.0 F 3.100 Yes No Clear 9 10 0
3 C 38.9 M 3.430 No No Clear 9 10 0
4 C 38.9 F 3.650 No No Clear 9 10 0
5 C 38.3 F 3.650 No Yes Yellow 7 8 0
6 I 37.9 F 2.740 No No Clear 9 10 0
7 I 38.6 F 2.665 No No Clear 9 10 0
8 C 38.1 M 3.020 No No Clear 9 10 0
9 I 39.0 F 3.590 No No Clear 9 10 1
10 I 36.0 F 2.315 No No Clear 9 10 0
11 C 35.6 M 2.450 No No Clear 9 9 0
12 C 35.0 M 2.180 Yes Yes Green/
Brown
8 8 0
Total
n = 12
Mean ± SD 37.5 ± 1.44 3040 ± 562

C: cesarean; I: induced; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; AF: amniotic fluid

Differentially expressed genes in ICP

Twenty genes potentially correlated with ICP were found differentially expressed between ICP patients and controls (p < 0.05) and were reported in Table 3.

Table 3.

Differentially expressed genes in ICP

Spot
labels
Gene
symbol
GENBANK ID
(Homo sapiens)
Description Molecular function /
Biological process
Regulation RATIO
cases/control
P
value
1 AI668565.1 Transcribed locus Up 6.57 0.0178
2 AA436716 Transcribed locus Up 2.91 0.0321
3 SYT7 NM_004200.2 Synaptotagmin VII mRNA Synaptic exocytosis and neurotransmitter; plasma membrane repair; regulation of insulin secretion Up 2.44 0.0127
4 GABRA2 NM_000807.2 Gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor alpha 2 subunit Gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathway with chloride channel activity; regulation of neurotransmitter levels Up 1.99 0.0066
5 PFKP NM_002627.3 Phosphofructokinase, platelet Nucleotide and protein binding, kinase activity, glycolysis Up 1.89 0.0460
6 CA3 NM_005181.3 Carbonic anhydrase III, muscle specific Metal ion binding, lyase activity, metabolic response to oxidative stress Up 1.62 0.0372
7 NME3 NM_002513.2 Non-metastatic cells 3, protein expressed in Synthesis of nucleoside triphosphates other than ATP (CTP, GTP, UTP); induction of apoptosis Down 0.72 0.0005
8 BCL3 NM_005178.4 B-cell CLL/lymphoma 3 Transcription regulator activity as transcriptional co-activator Down 0.66 0.0295
9 PLTP NM_006227.2 Human phospholipid transfer protein mRNA Cholesterol metabolism; lipid transport Down 0.61 0.0296
10 PTMA NM_001099285.1 Prothymosin, alpha Transcription Down 0.57 0.0221
11 ID1 NM_002165.2 Inhibitor of DNA binding 1, dominant negative helix-loop-helix protein Protein binding, transcription repressor activity, angiogenesis, apoptosis Down 0.52 0.0389
12 KIFC3 NM_001130099 Kinesin family member C3 Microtubule motor activity; Golgi organization Down 0.51 0.0466
13 NDUFV1 NM_007103 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 1, 51kDa Mitochondrial electron transport, NADH to ubiquinone Down 0.47 0.0398
14 NRN1 NM_016588.2 Neuritin 1 Axonogenesis; nervous system development Down 0.49 0.0247
15 CLK2 NM_003993.2 CDC-like kinase 2 Phosphorylation of amino acid proteins in RNA splicing Down 0.45 0.0100
16 MYCL1 NM_001033081.2 v-myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog 1, lung carcinoma derived (avian) Regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent Down 0.42 0.0144
17 FKBP11 NM_001143781.1 FK506 binding protein 11, 19 kDa Protein folding Down 0.42 0.0137
18 AKAP10 NM_007202.2 Homo sapiens protein kinase A anchoring protein mRNA Signal transduction; protein localization Down 0.41 0.0328
19 BFAR NM_016561 Human bifunctional apoptosis regulator (BAR) mRNA Anti-apoptosis; apoptosis Down 0.39 0.0035
20 SNAPC4 NM_003086.2 Small nuclear RNA activating complex, polypeptide 4, 190kDa Regulation of transcription Down 0.38 0.0007

Among these, three belong to genetic classes involved in pathogenic mechanisms of ICP: (1) GABA receptor alpha-2 subunit gene (GABRA2), which was twofold upregulated in ICP group compared with controls, may be included in pathophysiology of pruritus; (2) gene coding for human phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP), which was downregulated of 0.6-fold than controls, may belong to lipid metabolism and bile composition; and (3) kinesin family member C3 gene (KIFC3), which was down-regulated of 0.5 fold in ICP group compared with controls, may be included in protein trafficking and cytoskeleton arrangement.

Gene expression results from microarray were confirmed by RT-PCR for three selected genes. We have found that the expression of SYT7, GABRA2 and PFKP was significantly elevated in ICP group, 1.5, 1.77 and 3.80 fold, respectively, compared with control group (p < 0.05), and these results were consistent with the microarray results.

DISCUSSION

Using the microarray technique, we obtained a profile of differentially expressed genes in women with ICP that have been never pointed before. It was found that 6 genes were upregulated and 14 down-regulated. A previous study using the same technology has been conducted byWei et al. in placental samples from women with ICP [17]. Some genes may be classified into a complex category, which can be named as “immunity and cell growth”. Among this category, the B-cell growth factor precursor A has been found as more upregulated. Indeed, T lymphocytes routinely possess an intracytoplasmic pool of the precursor proteins, which are stimulated under a variety of conditions [18]. Therefore, a relationship between precursor and products exists for the processing of B-cell growth, analogous to that described for several cytokines [18]. Abnormal immunity has been described in ICP, including abnormalities in innate and adaptive immunity [19,20].

Other genes, although with a less power of significance, might have a role in this complex alteration of immunity.

It is also interesting to note that at least three other genes (coding for GABA receptor alpha 2 subunit, human PLTP, and kinesin family member C3) can be restricted into pathogenic mechanisms involved in ICP: (i) pathophysiology of pruritus; (ii) lipid metabolism and bile formation and (iii) protein trafficking and cytoskeleton arrangement.

GABA receptor alpha-2 subunit

GABA is an important neurotransmitter, which regulates the neuronal excitability in the nervous system. The GABA receptors comprise three classes: GABAA, GABAB and GABAC. GABRA2 coding for GABA A receptor alpha 2 subunit is located on chromosome arm 4p12 [21].

GABA receptors have been implicated in multiple neurological functions including pruritus. Interestingly, GABA A receptors have been found highly expressed in skin biopsies from patients with psoriasis and pruritus [22], suggesting an active role of GABA system in pruritus.

Gabapentin, a synthetic analogue of GABA, has been studied as a therapeutic agent for treating pruritus. Its mechanism of action relates to its binding on the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels and thereby inhibiting high threshold neuronal calcium channels [23]. A pilot study investigating the use of gabapentin in children with healing burn wounds demonstrated a marked reduction in reported itching and the reduction of antihistamine intake [24]. Unfortunately, in another double-blind randomized, placebocontrolled trial, gabapentin did not provide significant advantage over the placebo in patients with pruritus of cholestasis [25].

Indeed, the up-regulation of GABRA2 gene in ICP indicates that the GABA system is actively involved in the pathophysiology of this condition. The change in GABRA1 expression in ICP group was confirmed by RT PCR.

Phospholipid transfer protein

PLTP is a 476 aminoacid protein (M281 kDA) with six N-linked glycosilation sites, which has a key role in the intravascular remodelling of high density lipoprotein (HDL) [26]. PLTP gene expression is controlled by nuclear receptors such as farnesoid X receptor and liver X receptor [27]. PLTP promotes transferring of phospholipids from very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and chylomicrons into HDL; moreover, it may contribute to the remodelling of HDL particles [28]. To date, no genetic deficiency has been reported for PLTP. Interestingly, a genetic variant in PLTP has been shown to modulate lipoprotein profiles in hyper-alphalipoproteinemia [29]. Another variant in the PLTP gene has been demonstrated to be associated with higher HDL and lower triglycerides [30]. Our results add another prospective in the elucidation of the role of this protein in human lipoprotein metabolism in pregnancy.

Kinesin family member C3

KIFC3 is one of the kinesin-14 family members which are molecular motors that sort and transport proteins and lipids along microtubules [31]. In an elegant study, Japanese authors found that KIFC3 is concentrated at the zonula adherens of the epithelial cells, the apical most part of cadherin-based adherens junctions, via a protein that they termed Zezha [32]. Moreover, KIFC3 plays an essential role in Golgi positioning under the cholesterol-depleted condition [33]. Therefore, KIFC3 should be regarded as a novel regulatory mechanism of cholesterol in membrane trafficking. We found KIFC3 down-regulated in ICP, probably for the increased synthesis in cholesterol. Total bile acids are increased in ICP, representing one of the hallmarks in this condition. In particular, the levels of cholic acid or the ratio of cholic acid to chenodeoxycholic acid have been shown to be the most sensitive indicators of ICP [34]. Bile salts are polar derivatives of cholesterol, thus a downregulation of the KIFC3 might be a protective mechanism toward the increase in bile salts. However, this is only a preliminary hypothesis that needs to be verified in future. Cholesterol is also the source of hormones, including progesterone (which prepares uterus lining for implantation of ovum) and estrogens. Hormonal abnormalities have been found in ICP with a typical pattern of steroid hormone metabolites in urine constitutes by disulphates of pregnanediols [35].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed that ICP has a multifactorial pathogenesis involving a genetic susceptibility, an altered immunity, abnormalities in hormone metabolism and possibly environmental factors.

The microarray technique is allowed to point out several genes which might contribute the pathogenic mechanisms, in particular genes involved in the pathophysiology of pruritus, of lipid metabolism and bile formation, and in the synthesis of protein trafficking and cytoskeleton arrangement.

The GABRA2 gene upregulation in ICP suggests an active role of GABA system in the pathophysiology of pruritus of ICP. The down-regulation of PLTP gene supposes a role of PLTP in HDL metabolism and in reverse cholesterol transport pathways at the fetoplacental barrier. The down-regulation of KIFC3 in ICP proposes a likely protective mechanism to counteract the increase of bile salts.

Acknowledgments

Funding: The research was supported, in part, by the Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS and by a Ministerial grant (ex 60% fund).

Footnotes

Disclosure: The authors report no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lammert F, Marschall H-U, Glantz A, Matern S. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. J Hepatol 2000;33:1012–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Joshi D, James A, Quaglia A, et al. Liver disease in pregnancy. Lancet 2010;375:594–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Vree JM, Jacquemin E, Sturm E, et al. Mutations in the MDR3 gene cause progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:282–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jacquemin E, Cresteil D, Manouvrier S, et al. Heterozygous nonsense mutation of the MDR3 gene in familial intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Lancet 1999;353:210–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eloranta ML, Heiskanen JTM, Hiltunen MJ, et al. Multidrug resistance 3 gene mutation 1712delT and estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms in Finnish women with obstetric cholestasis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repr Biol 2002;105:132–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Savander M, Ropponen A, Avela K, et al. Genetic evidence of heterogeneity in intrahepatic cholestsis of pregnancy. Gut 2003;52:1025–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dixon PH, Weerasekera N, Linton KJ, et al. Heterozygous MDR3 missense mutation associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: evidence for a defect in protein trafficking. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9:1209–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Floreani A, Carderi I, Paternoster D, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: three novel MDR3 gene mutations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;43:1152–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Floreani A, Carderi I, Paternoster D, et al. Hepatobiliary phospholipid transporter ABSB4, MDR3 gene variants in a large color of Italian women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Dig Liver Dis 2008;40:366–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pauli-Magnus C, Steiger B, Meier Y, et al. Enterohepatic transport of bile salts and genetics of cholestasis. J Hepatol 2005;43:342–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jacquemin D, De Vree MJ, Cresteil D, et al. The wide spectrum of multidrug resistance 3 deficiency: from neonatal cholestasis to cirrhosis of adulthood. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1448–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pauli-Magnus C, Meier PJ, Stieger B. Genetic determinants of drug-induced cholestasis and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Semin Liver Dis 2010;30:147–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pauli-Magnus C, Lang T, Meier Y, et al. Sequence analysis of bile salt export pump (ABCB11) and multidrug resistance p-glycoprotein 3 (ABCB4, MDR3) in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Pharmacogenetics 2004;14:91–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Keitel V, Vogt C, Haussinger D, et al. Combined mutations of canalicular transporter proteins cause severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Gastroenterology 2006;131:624–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Watson A, Mazumder A, Stewart M, et al. Technology for microarray analysis of gene expression. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1998;9:609–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 1979;74:829–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wei J, Wang H, Yang X, et al. Altered gene profile of placenta from women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;281:801–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sahasrabuddhe CG, Morgan J, Sharma S, et al. Evidence for an intracellular precursor for human B-cell growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1984;81:7902–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang ZP, Dong MY, Chu HN, et al. Increased serum levels of neopterin and soluble interleukin-2 receptor in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:1067–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ling B, Yao FQ, Zhou Y, et al. Cell-mediated immunity imbalance in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Cell Mol Immunol 2007;4:71–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McLean PJ, Farb DH, Russek SJ. Mapping of the alpha 4 subunit gene (GABRA4) to human chromosome 4 defines an alpha 2-alpha 4-beta 1-gamma 1 gene cluster: further evidence that modern GABAA receptor gene clusters are derived from an ancestral cluster. Genomics 1995;26:580–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nigam R, El-Nour H, Amatya B, et al. GABA and GABAA receptor expression on immune cells in psoriasis: a pathophysiological role. Arch Derm Res 2010;302:507–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goutos I, Dziewulski P, Richardson P. Pruritus in burns: review article. J Burn Care Res 2009;30:221–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mendham JE. Gabapentin for the treatment of itching produced by burns and wound healing in children: a pilot study. Bums 2004;30:851–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bergasa NV, McGee M, Ginsburh IH, et al. Gabapentin in patients with the pruritus of cholestasis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology 2006;44:1317–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Day JRJJ Albers CE, Lofton-Day TL, et al. Complete cDNA encoding human phospholipid transfer protein from human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 1994;269:9388–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mak PA, Kast-Woelnber HR, Anisfeld AM, Edwards PA. Identification of PLTP as an LXR target gene and apoE as an FXR target gene reveals overlapping targets for the two nuclear receptors. J Lipid Res 2002;43:2037–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Masson D, Jiang XC, Lagrost L, Tall AR. The role of transfer protein in lipoprotein metabolism and atherogenesis. J Lipid Res 2009; 50: S201–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Engler MB, Pullinger CR, Malloy MJ, et al. Genetic variation in phospholipid transfer protein modulates lipoprotein profiles in hyperalphalipotroteinemia. Metabolism 2008;57:1719–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kathiresan SC, Willer GM, Peloso S, et al. Common variants at 30 loci contribute to polygenic dyslipidemia. Nat Genet 2009;41:56–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hirokawa N. Kinesin and dyene in superfamily proteins and the mechanism of organelle transport. Science 1998;279:519–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Meng W, Mushika Y, Ichil T, et al. Anchorage of microtubule minus snds to adherens junctions regulates epithelial cell-cell contacts. Cell 2008;135:948–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu Y, Takeda S, Nakata T, et al. Role of KIFC3 motor protein in Golgi positioning and integration. J Cell Biol 2002; 158:293–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sinakos E, Lindor KD. Bile acid profiles in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: is this the solution to the enigma of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy? Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105:596–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Glantz A, Reilly SJ, Benthin L, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: amelioration of pruritus by UDCA is associated with decreased progesterone disulphates in urine. Hepatology 2007;47:544–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES