Abstract
Cell fate transitions in mammalian stem cell systems have often been associated with transcriptional heterogeneity; however, existing data have failed to establish a functional or mechanistic link between the two phenomena. Experiments in unicellular organisms support the notion that transcriptional heterogeneity can be used to facilitate adaptability to environmental changes and have identified conserved chromatin‐associated factors that modulate levels of transcriptional noise. Herein, we show destabilization of pluripotency‐associated gene regulatory networks through increased transcriptional heterogeneity of mouse embryonic stem cells in which paradigmatic histone acetyl‐transferase, and candidate noise modulator, Kat2a (yeast orthologue Gcn5), have been inhibited. Functionally, network destabilization associates with reduced pluripotency and accelerated mesendodermal differentiation, with increased probability of transitions into lineage commitment. Thus, we show evidence of a relationship between transcriptional heterogeneity and cell fate transitions through manipulation of the histone acetylation landscape of mouse embryonic stem cells, suggesting a general principle that could be exploited in other normal and malignant stem cell fate transitions. stem cells 2018;36:1828–11
Keywords: Embryonic stem cells, Epigenetics, Gene expression pluripotency
Significance Statement.
Pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) are capable of differentiating toward all mature cell types through cell fate transition events, which are often associated with increased transcriptional heterogeneity. Yet, there is little understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. Through inhibition of the histone acetyltransferase Kat2a in pluripotent mESCs, an increase in transcriptional heterogeneity (as measured by coefficient of variation) and an increased probability of exit from pluripotency is observed. The results of this study suggest the existence of an important relationship between chromatin modification, transcriptional heterogeneity, and cell fate decisions, which is likely to be important in understanding development and disease.
Introduction
Cellular states, and their associated transitions, are a function of the transcriptional programs active in the cell, which in turn depend on the chromatin configuration of their respective genes. It has been observed in multiple mammalian differentiation and developmental systems, including in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, that the cellular states during transition events are heterogeneous at the transcriptional level 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Such heterogeneity is thought to reflect temporal variability in gene expression, within individual cells, in an uncoordinated manner 8. When variability affects genes that are regulators or effectors of cell fates, the expression status of individual genes can endow cells with different probabilities of effecting a transition 9, eventually resulting in a proportion of cells acquiring the new fate; thus, heterogeneity in expression of these genes would vary the transition probability from a given state.
The homeobox gene Nanog is a paradigmatic pluripotency regulator that exhibits such variability in gene expression 10, 11, 12. Nanog is strictly required for establishment of pluripotency, both in vitro and in the embryo 13, but is dispensable for its maintenance 11. Nanog transcriptional reporters have been used to prospectively isolate cells on the basis of expression levels and, while there is some reversibility between Nanog high and low expression states, Nanog low cells have a higher probability of exiting self‐renewal into differentiation 10, 12. A role of Nanog down‐regulation in the probabilistic exit from pluripotency is supported by experiments coupling reversible Nanog knockdown with single‐cell transcriptomics showing that remodeling of pluripotency networks associated with Nanog loss can be transiently reversed 14.
The Nanog transcriptional reporters that are based on stable green fluorescent protein (GFP; heterozygous TNGA cells) 11 exhibit a trimodal distribution of high, mid and low GFP populations. While the high and low states represent the active and inactive transcriptional state of Nanog, respectively, the mid‐Nanog (MN) population is likely to contain cells in which the Nanog promoter has been recently switched off, reversibly or irreversibly, causing the GFP levels to decay. This population is less apparent in destabilized fluorescent reporters such as the destabilized Venus reporter line, Nanog‐venus‐nuclear localization signal‐pEST degradation signal (VNP) 15, confirming that intermediate levels of expression are not sustainable and resolve rapidly into high (HN) or low (LN) states. Therefore, in theory, the MN population should encompass all bona fide early transition events out of pluripotency and into lineage commitment. However, its transient nature makes it difficult to probe the molecular programs of the state transition separate from protracted GFP expression, or confounding dissociation between reporter and endogenous Nanog expression 16.
Assessing the mechanistic basis of the transition out of pluripotency can be finely achieved through the use of Nanog reporter systems and it may shed light on a putative contribution of transcriptional heterogeneity to the probabilistic nature of cell state transitions. Dynamic changes in transcriptional activity, and the resulting changes in state‐transition probabilities, are likely to be regulated, at least in part, at the level of histone lysine acetylation. In yeast, amplitude and frequency of transcriptional bursting 17 are regulated by distinct histone acetyl‐transferase and deacetylase complexes which determine levels of H3K9 acetylation (H3K9ac) in the promoter and the body of the gene 18. Promoter acetylation influences transcriptional variability or noise, as measured by coefficient of variation (CV = standard deviation/mean). Loss of the histone acetyl‐transferase Gcn5 or its partner Sgf29 result in increased noise, while loss of components of the Rdp3s histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex, which increase levels of H3K9ac, reduce gene expression CV.
To achieve a global reduction of H3K9ac in mouse ES cells, we chemically inhibited Gcn5 with the (2R,3S)‐rel‐4‐Methylene‐5‐oxo‐2‐propyltetrahydrofuran‐3‐carboxylic acid (MB‐3) compound 19, which we have recently validated to phenocopy loss of Gcn5 homolog KAT2A in mammalian cells 20. While this resulted in minimal changes to average gene expression levels, it caused a significant enhancement of expression heterogeneity for a number of genes, including Nanog, with associated remodeling of gene regulatory networks (GRNs). These changes associated with functional destabilization of pluripotency and accelerated differentiation, namely to mesendodermal (ME) lineages. Our results suggest that increased transcriptional heterogeneity may not only reflect but indeed mechanistically promote state transitions in mammalian cells.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture
E14Tg2A, TNGA 11, Nanog‐VNP 15, Sox1‐GFP 21, and T‐GFP 22 mouse ES cells were maintained or differentiated as described 23. 2i medium used N2B27 (NDiff 227, Takara, Saint‐Germain‐en‐Laye, France) with 1 μM PDO325901 (R&D, Abingdon, UK) and 3 μM Chiron (Cambridge Wellcome Trust/Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute). Kat2a inhibition used 100 μM MB‐3 (ab141255, AbCam, Cambridge, UK) 19, or an equal volume of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). ES cell colony‐forming capacity was quantified using Alkaline Phosphatase detection kit (Sigma Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) as per manufacturer's instructions.
Flow Cytometry
Cell sorting was done on MoFlo (Beckman Coulter, High Wycombe, UK), FACSAria III (BD, Wokingham, UK), or Influx (BD) machines, and analysis performed on a BD LSR‐Fortessa, with 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) as a dead cell marker. Apoptosis analysis used Annexin‐V antibody (a13202 Fluor‐568, Invitrogen, Loughborough, UK) and DAPI as per manufacturers' instructions. Cell cycle analysis used Propidium Iodide staining of ethanol‐fixed cells.
Wash‐Off Experimental Protocol
TNGA cells in serum and leukemia inhibitory factor, LIF (ESLIF) were grown for 1 or 2 days with DMSO or MB‐3 (50 and 100 μM), or exposed to control N2B27 pro‐differentiation conditions. At the end of the treatment, cells were washed of the treatment, their GFP profile assessed, and cultured for up to 5 days in ESLIF with daily monitoring of distribution of GFP levels (Supporting Information Fig. S3A). The composite GFP distribution obtained from randomly sampled cells from all time‐points and conditions was best described by three Gaussian curves that correspond to the HN, MN, and LN states 24 (Supporting Information Fig. S3B), and every cell was assigned to one of these states using a probabilistic soft clustering approach (see Supporting Information Data). Population proportions were calculated for each condition at each time point, and kinetic modeling used to estimate rates of transition between states and general state reversibility (Fig. 3B, 3C).
RNA Sequencing
RNA extracted from TNGA cells treated in triplicate for 48 hours in ESLIF with DMSO or MB‐3 (100 μM), was used for polyA library preparation and sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq4000 instrument (Illumina, Cambridge, UK). Details of alignment, quantification, differential gene expression and data analysis are described in Supporting Information Data. Data have been deposited in GEO (GSE114797).
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing
Chromatin was prepared from TNGA cells treated in duplicate for 48 hours in ESLIF with DMSO or MB‐3 (100 μM), and immunoprecipitated with an anti‐H3K9ac antibody (ab4441, AbCam), as described 20. Details of alignment, peak calling and identification, and data analysis are described in detail in Supporting Information Data. Data have been deposited in GEO (GSE114797).
Single‐Cell Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Single‐cell quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (scRT‐qPCR) followed the Fluidigm Two‐Step Single‐Cell Gene Expression method on a 96.96 Dynamic Array IFC and the BioMark HD system (Fluidigm, London, UK), with EvaGreen Supermix 25 (primers in Supporting Information Table S1) or Taqman Assays (Supporting Information Table S2). Commercially available spike‐ins (Fluidigm, C1 RNA Standards Assay Kit, PN100‐5582) controlled for technical variability. Further details of analysis are described in Supporting Information Data.
Results
Kat2a Inhibition in Mouse ES Cells Decreases H3K9ac and Enhances Heterogeneity of Nanog Expression
We treated TNGA cells with MB‐3 and observed a global reduction of H3K9ac both in number and height (Fig. 1A) of acetylation peaks. As expected for H3K9ac mark, the large majority of peaks were located in the vicinity of transcriptional start sites (TSS) (Fig. 1B), and the regions in which acetylation was lost as a result of MB‐3 treatment were significantly enriched for Kat2a/Gcn5 occupancy as per the ENCODE significance tool (Fig. 1C), supporting specificity of MB‐3 activity. Myc/Max and E2F binding was also enriched at these locations, highlighting their well‐described cooperation with Kat2a 26, 27. The loci specifically affected by Kat2a inhibition (Supporting Information Files S1 and S2) associated with metabolic functions, namely mitochondrial, as well as DNA and RNA metabolism (Supporting Information File S3), suggesting an impact on general, rather than tissue‐specific, functions and putative pervasive activities across multiple cell types. Interestingly, the overall reduction in H3K9ac did not translate into substantial changes in gene expression (Fig. 1D), as RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) analysis of MB‐3 versus DMSO (vehicle)‐treated TNGA cells revealed 599 differentially expressed genes, with only 3 at a fold change ≥2 (Supporting Information File S4). Differentially expressed genes showed overlap with genes with differential H3K9ac and were significantly enriched in Kat2a binding targets (Fig. 1E), namely those recently described in mouse ES cells 26 (Fig. 1F). Given that the reduction in H3K9ac was not matched by significant changes in gene expression levels, we asked whether treatment might instead result in enhanced cell‐to‐cell heterogeneity of transcription, as described for Gcn5 in yeast.
We selected a representative subset of Kat2a binding targets, using the Hirsch et al. dataset to identify 47 targets of interest, and interrogated 70 individual cells (35 DMSO, 35 MB‐3) for transcript levels and cell‐to‐cell transcriptional variability (measured by CV), using scRT‐qPCR. Similar to the RNA‐seq data, we did not find significant differences in mean expression levels between the two treatments (Fig. 1G). However, for the majority of the individual genes analyzed, as well as at a global level, there was a significant increase in CV (Fig. 1H). The data thus support the hypothesis that inhibition of Kat2a‐dependent H3K9ac results in increased transcriptional heterogeneity in mouse ES cells, similarly to previous observations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (supporting information data of 18).
We then focused on components of the pluripotency network and asked whether their H3K9ac status was affected by Kat2a inhibition. We found that individual H3K9ac peaks were lost in the proximal upstream regions of the Pou5f1/Oct4 locus 28 upon MB‐3 treatment (Fig. 2A), an observation that extended to its regulator Sall4 30(Supporting Information File S2). Furthermore, we observed a reduction in H3K9ac in the Nanog locus (Fig. 2A), including at a distal H3K9ac‐enriched region which might correspond to an enhancer element 31. The impact on Nanog prompted us to check whether Kat2a inhibition with MB‐3‐affected heterogeneity of GFP expression in TNGA cells, which has been associated with altered likelihood of pluripotency and differentiation state transitions 24. Indeed, sustained inhibition of Kat2a activity modified GFP expression from the Nanog locus, with increased representation of MN cells and a broader distribution of fluorescence intensity values, distinct from the dominant HN observed in control cells (Fig. 2B). A similar increase in Nanog expression heterogeneity could be reproduced in wild‐type E14tg2A mouse ES cells using immunofluorescence staining of endogenous NANOG protein (Fig. 2C), suggesting that the results were not limited to the TNGA genetic background.
Knockdown of Kat2a expression, through lentiviral‐delivered short hairpin RNAs, supports the specificity of inhibitor activity. Kat2a depletion in TNGA cells increases heterogeneity in the distribution of Nanog levels in a manner proportional to the level of Kat2a knockdown, with accumulation of MN and LN cells (Supporting Information Fig. S1A). Similar results are obtained in the Nanog‐VNP cell line 15(Supporting Information Fig. S1B), in which MB‐3 treatment also results in a shift toward lower Nanog levels (Supporting Information Fig. S1C). Overall, the results indicate that loss of Kat2a activity impacts variability of Nanog expression in a manner suggestive of enhanced transition out of pluripotency, as represented by high Nanog levels. We pursued these findings at a functional level to determine the associated impact on cellular state.
Kat2a Inhibition Impacts Mouse ES Cell Pluripotency and Differentiation
We tested the functional impact of Kat2a inhibition on pluripotency by treating TNGA, E14tg2a, and Nanog‐VNP cells with MB‐3 or DMSO in conventional serum and LIF‐containing culture conditions (ESLIF; Fig. 3A). After 1–3 days of treatment, we washed off the inhibitor, and cultured the cells under stringent naïve pluripotency “2i” conditions 32, after which we quantified the number of undifferentiated alkaline phosphatase‐positive colonies obtained. While DMSO exposure had no effect on colony formation, cells exposed to MB‐3 gradually lost the capacity to establish pluripotent colonies (Fig. 3B), compatibly with an increased probability of exiting the pluripotent state. In agreement with these findings, TNGA cells newly cultured in 2i conditions from ESLIF routine culture, in the presence of MB‐3, show a broader GFP peak (Supporting Information Fig. S2A), which is lost as cells undergo increased apoptosis (Supporting Information Fig. S2B), presumably because of the inability of 2i medium to sustain primed and committed states. Cells cultured in ESLIF, conversely, do not show increased apoptosis (Supporting Information Fig. S2B), and their cell cycle status is also not affected (Supporting Information Fig. S2C). Interestingly, cells adapted to 2i conditions over several passages are unaffected by Kat2a inhibition by 2i + MB‐3 treatment (Supporting Information Fig. S2D), which may reflect a change of epigenetic control, and is not dissimilar to loss of Nanog itself in mouse ES cells.
We then asked if Kat2a inhibition promoted differentiation decisions. We took advantage of ES cells with a GFP reporter of ME marker T (Brachyury) 22 and treated them for variable periods of time in the presence of DMSO or MB‐3 before washing‐off the treatment and placing the cells under ME‐promoting culture conditions (Fig. 4A). We observed a significant acceleration of T expression in cells exposed to MB‐3 (Fig. 4B). The same, however, was not true of Sox1‐GFP 33 expression in ES cells placed under neuro‐ectodermal (NE) culture conditions after inhibitor treatment (Supporting Information Fig. S2E), suggesting some selectivity in lineage commitment decisions.
Kat2a Inhibition Captures a MN Transition State in Mouse ES Cells
The impact of MB‐3 treatment on pluripotency and ME differentiation is suggestive of a change in the probability of state transition, rather than with an absolute requirement to either state. To measure the probability of ES cells moving from pluripotency toward priming and commitment and the reversibility of these transitions, we used the TNGA cells and modeled rates of transition between HN (pluripotent), MN (primed), and LN (committed) states upon treatment exposure and wash‐off (Fig. 5A; see section for details).
DMSO‐treated cells were unchanged by the treatment and transited between HN and MN states with a slight advantage toward the reverse movement, sustaining a dominant HN population. N2B27‐treated cells showed a clear movement toward the LN state, denoting irreversible differentiation, which was dependent on the duration of treatment. MB‐3‐treated cells displayed a unique pattern of long‐term retention in the MN state, with slow transition rates in either direction and a progressive dose and time‐dependent decrease in reversibility (Fig. 5B, 5C and Supporting Information Fig. S3A, S3B). A similar pattern was observed in TNGA sorted as MN and exposed to MB‐3 (Supporting Information Fig. S3C). Overall, the data suggest that inhibition of Kat2a‐mediated acetylation permits the capture of mouse ES cells at the exit of pluripotency; in doing so, it may enrich for an otherwise fleeting state of transition out of pluripotency and into early ME differentiation.
MB‐3‐Driven Pluripotency‐To‐ME Transition Associates with Transcriptional Heterogeneity
We next sought to characterize the transcriptional architecture of the transition state at single‐cell resolution by interrogating individual cells captured from MB‐3 and DMSO‐treated cultures of mouse TNGA ES cells. We used scRT‐qPCR transcriptional profiling and determined the presence, level, and heterogeneity of expression of a selection of 92 genes with roles in ES cell pluripotency and differentiation (Supporting Information Fig. S4A). We excluded LN cells to avoid the confounding effect of irreversibly committed or differentiated cells, and analyzed 90 TNGA cells from ESLIF cultures, which are permissive to priming, and 138 from recently established naïve 2i cultures, which respond to MB‐3 treatment with a broadened peak of GFP fluorescence intensity (Supporting Information Fig. S2A), but do not sustain priming of differentiation programs. Global representation of the transcriptional programs of individual TNGA cells under the different experimental conditions shows an evident separation between the transcriptional spaces occupied by naïve and primed pluripotency. Importantly, it also reveals that the transcriptional space occupied by MB‐3‐treated 2i cells is in closer proximity to primed pluripotency than control (DMSO‐treated) 2i cells (Fig. 6A), suggesting a requirement for Kat2a activity in establishing or maintaining pluripotency. This is consistent with the findings of Dent and colleagues 26, who identified a requirement for Kat2a in coordination with Myc in establishing induced pluripotency upon reprograming of differentiated somatic cells. In contrast, Kat2a active and inactive primed pluripotency transcriptional landscapes are closely overlapping (Fig. 6A), which may partly reflect the exclusion of cells with lower levels of Nanog, and also denote the slow transit of MB‐3 treated cells out of the primed self‐renewal (Supporting Information Fig. S3B).
We inspected the specific changes in single‐cell gene expression patterns imposed by MB‐3 treatment which underlay a misconfiguration of the 2i transcriptional state. We noted that MB‐3 treated cells in naïve pluripotent conditions significantly enhanced cell‐to‐cell variability, or heterogeneity, of gene expression levels relative to control (Fig. 6B and Supporting Information File S5), a finding reminiscent of the role of Kat2a yeast homolog Gcn5 in transcriptional noise 34. A similar significant gain of gene expression variability was also observed in primed cells upon MB‐3 treatment (Fig. 6B and Supporting Information File S5). Increased heterogeneity occurred at all levels of average gene expression (Supporting Information Fig. S4B), and with no significant change to average gene expression levels (Fig. 6C and Supporting Information Fig. S4D). Frequency of gene expression was more dynamic between conditions, with minimal changes in ES‐LIF, and some significant gains and losses in 2i in the presence of MB‐3 (Supporting Information Fig. S4C). We did not observe the presence of new cell clusters within ES‐LIF or 2i cultures upon MB‐3 treatment (Supporting Information Fig. S4E), suggesting that the observed gain in heterogeneity upon Kat2a inhibition results from transcriptional perturbation and does not arise from the de novo emergence of new cell populations. We sought to articulate changes in gene expression frequency and variability of transcript levels through inference of GRNs, to understand the contribution of transcriptional heterogeneity to regulatory programs at the exit of pluripotency.
MB‐3‐Driven Reconfiguration of GRNs Is Centered on Noise and H3K9ac Changes
We focused on control and MB‐3 treated cells in 2i culture conditions, where the transcriptional distance between states is more notable, and attempted to infer GRNs through a combination of binary and correlation methods we recently used in an adult differentiation system 35 (Supporting Information File S6). Given the proposed association from our data between loss of Kat2a‐dependent H3K9ac and gene expression variability, we asked if this phenomenon might be instrumental in reconfiguring GRNs. Reassuringly, the inferred control network was strongly nucleated in pluripotency factor Oct4/Pou5f1 (Fig. 7A), as well as in Wnt signaling elements Ctnnb and Cdh1, which likely reflect GSK‐dependent Wnt activation in 2i culture conditions. Upon MB‐3 treatment, we observed a specific reduction of network connectivity amongst nodes dependent on Kat2a activity for H3K9ac (Fig. 7B). Pluripotency regulators Pou5f1 and Sall4, as well as Jarid2 showed complete loss of connectivity upon Kat2a inhibition, while the network around Cdh1 was greatly reduced (Fig. 7A, 7B). Importantly, when focusing on remodeled edges built around the respiratory chain component Ndufa9 and differentiation factor Mff, both H3K9ac differential targets, we observed that the new connections established upon MB‐3 treatment were with genes presenting significantly higher CV gains relative to non‐remodeled edges (Fig. 7C); as a trend, gains in CV were also higher relative to edges exclusively detected in DMSO‐treated cultures. A similar pattern of higher CV gains upon Kat2a inhibition was not observed in remodeled edges around nodes not strictly dependent on Kat2a for H3K9ac (Fig. 7D), suggesting a direct contribution to locus regulation. Furthermore, in interrogating the networks for genes exclusively connected upon Kat2a inhibition, we found that these presented higher CV gains than those genes exclusively present in the control network (Fig. 7E), suggesting a role for noise in network maintenance and reconfiguration.
The nature of the genes unique to each network underlies the phenotypes observed. In addition to Pou5f1, Sall4, and Jarid2, the control network uniquely also includes Fgf signaling elements, recently reported to be regulated by Kat2a 27, and Id3, a BMP target 21. Amongst the nodes specific to the MB‐3 network are endodermal (Afp), mesodermal (Chrd, Wnt3a) and NE (Dmbx1, Evx1) differentiation genes. Interestingly, the MB‐3 network also uniquely includes Nanog, whose presence in the network may reflect capture of the proposed early transition state into commitment (Fig. 5 and Supporting Information Fig. S3). Overall, our data support the notion that MB‐3‐mediated loss of H3K9ac at target loci critically reconfigures the architecture of the GRN sustaining pluripotency, through a direct effect on variability of gene expression.
Discussion
We have shown that changes in the activity of the histone acetyl‐transferase Kat2a deplete a significant proportion of H3K9 acetylation sites at promoter locations and alter gene expression heterogeneity in mouse ES cells. Affected loci include key components of the pluripotency network, as well as general metabolic categories, which suggests that this mode of action may be extended to other cell types and developmental contexts. We have estimated heterogeneity on the basis of expression level CV and shown that Kat2a‐inhibited cultures exhibited higher CVs than controls, particularly when probed from naïve (2i) pluripotency conditions. Functionally, this translated into a curtailed ability to establish naïve pluripotency and an increased propensity to initiate ME differentiation, best explained by an increased probability to irreversibly exit the pluripotent state, without accompanying changes in cell cycle or apoptosis. Our recent report that loss of KAT2A can promote differentiation of human leukemic cells 20 is compatible with a generalization of the principles established in this work.
Notably, the radical changes observed upon MB‐3 treatment occur with minimal perturbation of average gene expression levels, sustaining the notion that variability of gene expression can, in itself, alter the probability of state transitions of individual cells. This is compatible with our previous observations in the hematopoietic system that lineage specification can be consequent to distinct individual molecular events, which are stochastic in nature and independently drive reorganization of transcriptional programs 9. Indeed, in mouse ES cells treated with MB‐3 and sampled from a newly established naïve pluripotency state, transcriptional heterogeneity resulted in a dramatic reconfiguration of GRNs, with destabilization of Pou5f1/Oct4 connectivity, as well as of other transcriptional and signaling regulators of pluripotency, including transcriptional and cell–cell adhesion components of the Wnt pathway. Furthermore, GRN remodeling observed upon Kat2a inhibition included novel associations suggestive of differentiation, but also concomitant nucleation of the networks by Nanog, likely denoting the capture of an early and normally transient state in which differentiation programs are primed in the context of a subsisting pluripotency network. Although it was not based on known interactions, our experimental and modeling data lend support to this interpretation.
The underlying transcriptional variability that accompanies capture of the MN transition state is reminiscent of other transition events associated with enhanced heterogeneity 2, 3, 5, 7. Recently, it was suggested that heterogeneity of expression levels occurs primarily in genes which decrease their expression at fate decisions 36 but that this heterogeneity resolves on commitment to a stable, differentiated state, requiring a dynamic means of transcriptional regulation. In line with this view, Ahrends et al. 1 have modeled the contribution of transcriptional noise during commitment and progression and adipocyte differentiation and found that while low levels of noise ensure lineage commitment, noise must be limited for differentiation to progress. Lysine acetylation is a highly dynamic post‐translational modification, and selective perturbation of H3K9 acetylation constitutes an interesting regulatory paradigm, as it associates with maintenance, but not with initiation, of transcriptional activity 37. As such, reduction in H3K9 acetylation at specific loci is likely to destabilize, but not abolish, the transcriptional processes, and result in stochastic gene expression, on which other more stable epigenetic marks can act. At a molecular level, our results mirror the effects of the yeast Kat2a homolog Gcn5 on transcriptional noise 18, 34, and thus suggest that in eukaryotes, H3K9 acetylation may play a central role in the control of heterogeneity. Our observations also suggest that dynamic control of transcriptional noise may be key to efficient state transitions.
Early reports on Kat2a null mouse ES cells did not indicate a requirement for maintenance of pluripotent cultures 38. However, they did denote an acceleration of differentiation of embryoid bodies, and reduced contribution to chimaeras, both of which are compatible with our observed destabilization of pluripotency and anticipation of early ME differentiation, as well as with the proposition that persistent high noise levels prevent terminal execution of lineage programs. Indeed, Kat2a‐null embryoid bodies, particularly in a conditional knockout framework, constitute a good system in which to test the contribution of gene expression heterogeneity at different stages of differentiation progression, and in different lineages. Recent detailed analysis of the molecular pathways underlying the Kat2a null defects in embryoid bodies 27 identified an association with general metabolic pathways, which we also see in our work, and a specific defect in Fgf signaling. Although Fgf signaling is actively repressed in our experimental context, it is noteworthy that Fgfr1 is a direct target of Kat2a‐mediated H3K9 acetylation, and that Fgf4 and Fgfr1 exhibit reduced network connectivity and increased variability of gene expression upon MB‐3 treatment.
Finally, it should be noted that we conducted the molecular analyses using MB‐3 chemical inhibition of Kat2a at fairly high concentration which has known limitations 39; however, we were able to validate the cellular consequences of Kat2a inhibition with gene expression knockdown, suggesting that the observed results are biologically specific to Kat2a. We also used various mouse ES cell lines, including TNGA cells that allow for the direct exclusion of committed cells and the verification of increased culture heterogeneity by a simple measure. TNGA are heterozygous for Nanog, and consequently partially defective for the autoregulatory loop that maintains Nanog expression 16 and re‐enforces pluripotency. The loss or inhibition of Kat2a in these cells may be sufficient to affect the metastability of the primed pluripotency state and enhance heterogeneity. The reproducibility of cellular events in non‐TNGA cells suggests a more universal mechanism of noise enhancement, but this may need to be experimentally validated in other ES cell lines, and distinct cell types. Along the same line, it will be interesting to test whether other epigenetic regulators suggested to regulate transcriptional noise in yeast 18 have a similar impact on exit from pluripotency, or if sequence editing of locus‐specific regulatory elements targeted by H3K9 acetylation promotes exit from pluripotency in wild‐type mouse ES cells. The recent demonstration that locus‐specific editing of promoter acetylation alters the frequency of transcriptional bursting 40, which may in turn modify transcriptional noise 18, supports the feasibility of the proposed approaches. The on‐going expansion of CRISPR‐based tools for gene and epigenetic editing 41 should further assist in these experiments and provide an invaluable resource for dissection of cell state transitions in multiple stem cell systems and during development.
Conclusion
In summary, we use Kat2a inhibition in mouse ES cells to establish a relationship between transcriptional heterogeneity and cell fate transitions, through manipulation of promoter acetylation and with destabilization of underlying transcriptional networks. This relationship may extend to other normal and malignant stem cell systems.
Author Contributions
N.M.: conception and design, collection and assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript; S.E.: collection and assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, final approval of manuscript; D.S.: data analysis and interpretation, final approval of manuscript; R.K.: data analysis and interpretation, final approval of manuscript; A.F.D.: collection and assembly of data, final approval of manuscript; T.B.: collection and assembly of data, final approval of manuscript; M.F.: supported data analysis and interpretation, final approval of manuscript; C.P.: conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, financial support, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Alfonso Martinez Arias for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank staff of Cambridge NIHR BRC Cell Phenotyping Hub, CIMR Flow Cytometry Core Facility, and Department of Pathology of the University of Cambridge for expert assistance with cell sorting. Library preparation for next‐generation sequencing was performed in the Cambridge Stem Cell Institute Genomics Core facility, with sequencing performed in the Genomics Core Unit of the CRUK Cambridge Institute. N.M. was funded by a BBSRC DTP Studentship, and S.E. is supported by a Cambridge Trust Studentship. R.K. was funded by an Isaac Newton Fellowship to C.P. and through an INT/WT‐ISSF/Univ Cambridge Joint Research Grant to C.P. M.F. work is supported by the British Heart Foundation Cambridge Centre of Excellence (RE/13/6/30180). D.S. work has been supported by an Isaac Newton fellowship to M.F. C.P. is funded by a Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund Intermediate Fellowship (KKL888) and a Leuka John Goldman Fellowship for Future Science (2017).
References
- 1. Ahrends R, Ota A, Kovary KM et al. Controlling low rates of cell differentiation through noise and ultrahigh feedback. Science 2014;344(6190):1384–1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bargaje R, Trachana K, Shelton MN et al. Cell population structure prior to bifurcation predicts efficiency of directed differentiation in human induced pluripotent cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114(9):2271–2276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Buganim Y, Faddah DA, Cheng AW et al. Single‐cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell 2012;150(6):1209–1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Grun D, Kester L, van Oudenaarden A. Validation of noise models for single‐cell transcriptomics. Nat Methods 2014;11(6):637–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mojtahedi M, Skupin A, Zhou J et al. Cell fate decision as high‐dimensional critical state transition. PLoS Biol 2016;14(12):e2000640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pina C, Fugazza C, Tipping AJ et al. Inferring rules of lineage commitment in haematopoiesis. Nat Cell Biol 2012;14(3):287–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Richard A, Boullu L, Herbach U et al. Single‐Cell‐Based Analysis Highlights a Surge in Cell‐to‐Cell Molecular Variability Preceding Irreversible Commitment in a Differentiation Process. PLoS Biol 2016;14(12):e1002585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Moris N, Pina C, Arias AM. Transition states and cell fate decisions in epigenetic landscapes. Nat Rev Genet 2016;17(11):693–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Teles J, Pina C, Eden P et al. Transcriptional regulation of lineage commitment—A stochastic model of cell fate decisions. PLoS Comput Biol 2013;9(8):e1003197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Abranches E, Guedes AM, Moravec M et al. Stochastic NANOG fluctuations allow mouse embryonic stem cells to explore pluripotency. Development 2014;141(14):2770–2779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D et al. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 2007;450(7173):1230–1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kalmar T, Lim C, Hayward P et al. Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 2009;7(7):e1000149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 2003;113(5):631–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. MacArthur BD, Sevilla A, Lenz M et al. Nanog‐dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity. Nat Cell Biol 2012;14(11):1139–1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Abranches E, Bekman E, Henrique D. Generation and characterization of a novel mouse embryonic stem cell line with a dynamic reporter of Nanog expression. PLoS One 2013;8(3):e59928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Smith RCG, Stumpf PS, Ridden SJ et al. Nanog Fluctuations in Embryonic Stem Cells Highlight the Problem of Measurement in Cell Biology. Biophys J 2017;112(12):2641–2652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Eldar A, Elowitz MB. Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 2010;467(7312):167–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Weinberger L, Voichek Y, Tirosh I et al. Expression noise and acetylation profiles distinguish HDAC functions. Mol Cell 2012;47(2):193–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Biel M, Kretsovali A, Karatzali E et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a small‐molecule inhibitor of the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2004;43(30):3974–3976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tzelepis K, Koike‐Yusa H, De Braekeleer E et al. A CRISPR dropout screen identifies genetic vulnerabilities and therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Rep 2016;17(4):1193–1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ying QL, Smith AG. Defined conditions for neural commitment and differentiation. Methods Enzymol 2003;365:327–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Fehling HJ, Lacaud G, Kubo A et al. Tracking mesoderm induction and its specification to the hemangioblast during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Development 2003;130(17):4217–4227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Turner DA, Trott J, Hayward P et al. An interplay between extracellular signalling and the dynamics of the exit from pluripotency drives cell fate decisions in mouse ES cells. Biol Open 2014;3(7):614–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Luo Y, Lim CL, Nichols J et al. Cell signalling regulates dynamics of Nanog distribution in embryonic stem cell populations. J R Soc Interface 2013;10(78):20120525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Trott J, Martinez Arias A. Single cell lineage analysis of mouse embryonic stem cells at the exit from pluripotency. Biol Open 2013;2(10):1049–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hirsch CL, Coban Akdemir Z, Wang L et al. Myc and SAGA rewire an alternative splicing network during early somatic cell reprogramming. Genes Dev 2015;29(8):803–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wang L, Koutelou E, Hirsch C et al. GCN5 Regulates FGF Signaling and Activates Selective MYC Target Genes during Early Embryoid Body Differentiation. Stem Cell Rep 2018;10(1):287–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 1998;95(3):379–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wang X, Dai J. Concise review: isoforms of OCT4 contribute to the confusing diversity in stem cell biology. Stem Cells 2010;28(5):885–893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Miller A, Ralser M, Kloet SL et al. Sall4 controls differentiation of pluripotent cells independently of the Nucleosome Remodelling and Deacetylation (NuRD) complex. Development 2016;143(17):3074–3084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jiang J, Chan YS, Loh YH et al. A core Klf circuitry regulates self‐renewal of embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10(3):353–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self‐renewal. Nature 2008;453(7194):519–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ying QL, Nichols J, Chambers I et al. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self‐renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 2003;115(3):281–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Raser JM, O'Shea EK. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 2004;304(5678):1811–1814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pina C, Teles J, Fugazza C et al. Single‐cell network analysis identifies DDIT3 as a nodal lineage regulator in hematopoiesis. Cell Rep 2015;11(10):1503–1510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Antolovic V, Miermont A, Corrigan AM et al. Generation of single‐cell transcript variability by repression. Curr Biol 2017;27(12):1811e3–1817e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Jin Q, Yu LR, Wang L et al. Distinct roles of GCN5/PCAF‐mediated H3K9ac and CBP/p300‐mediated H3K18/27ac in nuclear receptor transactivation. EMBO J 2011;30(2):249–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lin W, Srajer G, Evrard YA et al. Developmental potential of Gcn5(−/−) embryonic stem cells in vivo and in vitro. Dev Dyn 2007;236(6):1547–1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Dahlin JL, Nelson KM, Strasser JM et al. Assay interference and off‐target liabilities of reported histone acetyltransferase inhibitors. Nat Commun 2017;8(1):1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Nicolas D, Zoller B, Suter DM et al. Modulation of transcriptional burst frequency by histone acetylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115(27):7153–7158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Adli M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.