Abstract
Background
The relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and coronary blood flow is well described. There is autoregulation within a MAP range of 60 to 140 mmHg providing near constant coronary blood flow. Outside these limits flow becomes pressure-dependent. So far, response of myocardial oxygenation to changes in pressure and flow has been more difficult to assess. While established techniques mostly require invasive approaches, Oxygenation-Sensitive (OS) Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a technique that can non-invasively assess changes in myocardial tissue oxygenation. The purpose of this study was to follow myocardial oxygenation over a wide range of blood pressure variation within and outside known coronary autoregulatory limits using OS-CMR, and to relate these data to coronary hemodynamics.
Methods
Ten anaesthetized swine (German Large White) underwent left-sided thoracotomy and attachment of a perivascular flow probe to the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery for continuous measurement of blood flow (QLAD). Thereafter, animals were transferred into a 3T MRI scanner. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was varied in 10–15 mmHg steps by administering alpha1-receptor agents phenylephrine or urapidil. For each MAP level, OS-CMR images as well as arterial and coronary sinus blood gas samples were obtained simultaneously during brief periods of apnea. Relative changes (Δ) of coronary sinus oxygen saturation (ScsO2), oxygen delivery (DO2) and demand (MVO2), extraction ratio (O2ER) and excess (Ω) from respective reference levels at a MAP of 70 mmHg were determined and were compared to %change in OS-signal intensity (OS-SI) in simultaneously acquired OS-CMR images.
Results
QLAD response indicated autoregulation between MAP levels of 52 mmHg (lower limit) and127 mmHg (upper limit). OS-CMR revealed a global myocardial oxygenation deficit occurring below the lower autoregulation limit, with the nadir of OS-SI at -9.0%. With MAP values surpassing 70 mmHg, relative OS-SI increased to a maximum of +10.6%. Consistent with this, ΔScsO2, ΔDO2, ΔMVO2, ΔO2ER and ΔΩ responses indicated increasing mismatch of oxygenation balance outside the autoregulated zone. Changes in global OS-CMR were significantly correlated with all of these parameters (p≤0.02) except with ΔMVO2.
Conclusion
OS-CMR offers a novel and non-invasive route to evaluate the effects of blood pressure variations, as well as of cardiovascular drugs and interventions, on global and regional myocardial oxygenation, as demonstrated in a porcine model. OS-CMR identified mismatch of O2 supply and demand below the lower limit of coronary autoregulation. Vasopressor induced acute hypertension did not compromise myocardial oxygenation in healthy hearts despite increased cardiac workload and O2 demand. The clinical usefulness of OS-CMR remains to be established.
Introduction
Coronary autoregulation
Myocardial blood flow in humans delivers approximately 70-80ml/min/100g myocardial tissue at rest. Coronary flow reserve can increase myocardial blood flow up to 3-5-fold from resting conditions [1–3]. Vascular autoregulation is characteristic for vital organs such as heart and brain, ensuring adequate and near constant tissue blood flow over a wide range of blood pressure [4]. Thus, blood pressure variation within autoregulatory limits should not compromise delivery of O2 and nutrients. The main mechanism of blood pressure-dependent regulation of blood flow has been proposed in 1902 by Bayliss [5], and is known since as the Bayliss effect or myogenic control of vascular tone [6]. In healthy humans, coronary autoregulation has been reported to be effective within a range of mean arterial pressures (MAP) between approximately 60 and 140mmHg. Such limits may vary with different pathologies, and higher perfusion pressures may be required to maintain constant blood flow [7]. Especially in the presence of a fixed coronary stenosis or of overriding coronary vasodilation, blood flow becomes pressure dependent [8].
Coronary perfusion of the left ventricular myocardium mainly occurs during diastole. Hence, an increase in aortic diastolic pressure and a longer diastolic time will improve perfusion. When MAP increases beyond the upper autoregulatory limit, coronary blood flow is markedly increased and becomes pressure dependent. Arterial hypertension will also increase oxygen demand and may reduce subendocardial blood flow [9]. This can outweigh enhanced oxygen supply from coronary vasodilation. In fact such challenges have been shown to increase oxygen demand and myocardial oxygen extraction [2,7–10]. Thus, severe hypertension may uncouple oxygen demand from supply and may compromise myocardial oxygenation. This effect has traditionally been assessed by calculating oxygen supply and demand from invasive blood flow measurements and oximetry of the in- and out-flux blood. Data based on direct measurement of myocardial tissue oxygenation are scarce.
Conventional measures of oxygen supply and demand
Myocardial oxygenation depends on the balance of local oxygen supply (DO2) and demand (MVO2) [2,9,11,12]. Global myocardial oxygenation balance can be assessed by measuring arterial and coronary sinus haemoglobin, its oxygen saturation (ScsO2) and content [13]. ScsO2 is obtained invasively, e.g. via a surgically or fluoroscopically placed catheter in the coronary sinus. Oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) is another parameter to describe the relationship between oxygen supply and demand [14].
DO2 and MVO2 are determined by obtaining haemoglobin concentration, blood gas analysis and oximetric status from affluent and effluent blood together with blood flow measurement [15]. This global approach has the limitation that there is no information about regional supply-demand mismatch. Especially in coronary artery disease, global estimates are insensitive to insufficient blood flow in specific myocardial territories. Regionally resolved blood flow and oxygen content measurement would be required to assess regional oxygenation balance, which are clinically not feasible so far. Direct measurement of tissue oxygen tension or haemoglobin saturation have been proposed and would be preferable, but such methods are also invasive or require probes which are restricted to experimental settings only, for reasons of toxicity [16,17].
Assessment of myocardial oxygenation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Oxygenation Sensitive (OS) Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a non-invasive technique to map and to follow myocardial oxygenation changes. It uses the Blood Oxygen Level-dependent (BOLD-) effect to generate a contrast in MRI sequences susceptible to this effect. Pauling proposed in 1936 that deoxygenated haemoglobin (dHb) has magnetic properties differing from those in the oxygenated (HbO2) state [18]. Ogawa was the first to use this mechanism in the field of MRI imaging of the brain and proposed that the paramagnetic effects of dHb disturb magnetic field homogeneity on a molecular level [19]. This effect accelerates transverse magnetic relaxation through spin-spin interactions in T2- or T2*-sensitive MRI sequences, which decreases signal intensity (SI) in the resulting images. The diamagnetic HbO2 instead results in weak stabilization of the magnetic field, with no change in SI. While BOLD contrast effects have been utilized in functional MRI scans for long, exploitation of the same effect in the heart for OS-CMR has been developed only more recently [20]. Today, MR sequences have gained enough spatial and temporal resolution to allow introduction of OS-CMR to human diagnostics. Signal attenuation in OS-CMR images originates in the compartment of the post-capillary myocardial venules [21,22]. Mechanisms that increase dHb concentration, such as diminished oxygen supply (low SaO2, decreased blood flow) or increased oxygen extraction (e.g. during increased workload) attenuate local signal intensity (SI). Factors which reduce dHb concentration, like blood flow augmentation or reduction of oxygen demand (luxury perfusion), will enhance OS-signal intensity (SI) and produce regional hyperintensity [23]. Better regional oxygenation will thus be reflected by ipsi-regional increased SI when compared to a reference image. In contrast to ScsO2 [24], OS-CMR is capable to detect also regional oxygenation changes, with a resolution given by the size of the imaged voxels (defined by in-plane resolution and slice thickness, e.g. voxels of 2x2x10mm). SI is not an absolute measurement but must be interpreted as SI change, following a stimulus, in relation to a reference SI in the same region of interest. The derived proportional change in SI will represent a relative increase or decrease in myocardial tissue oxygenation in reference to the condition during which the reference image was acquired. Such SI changes at OS-CMR allow to follow changes in local post-capillary SO2, and hence, oxygen balance on a millimetre scale. Meanwhile, OS-CMR has been validated against other diagnostic modalities such as Positron Emission Tomography (PET)[25], Fractional Flow Reserve [26,27], and myocardial energetic indices in humans [28]. Experimental studies have established more fundamental relationships of OS-CMR change to invasively measured parameters such as arterial oxygen [29,30] and carbon dioxide partial pressure [31–33], coronary artery [34] and coronary sinus blood flow [24], labelled microsphere measurements, [35], coronary sinus oxymetriy [24] and haematocrit [36].
The primary aim of this study was to describe the myocardial oxygenation response to arterial pressure variation using OS-CMR, as elicited by phenylephrine and urapidil titration in an animal model. Secondary goals were to explore relationships between OS-CMR data and concurrent coronary blood flow and oximetry measurements.
Methods
Animal preparation
With Cantonal Animal Care Committee approval, fifteen adolescent German landrace swine (29.9±2.2kg) were used in this study. Prior to experiments, the animals were housed at the University Veterinary Facilities for 48h for acclimatization and to assess their general health. Two to four hours prior to the experiments they were transferred into the animal surgery facilities. Fasted for 6h and with free access to water until 2 hours prior the experiments, animals were premedicated with 20 mg/kg ketamine and 2 mg/kg xylazine intra-muscularly. Following IV induction with 10 mg of midazolam and 1 mg atropine, the trachea was intubated. Ventilator settings were a tidal volume of 6–8 ml/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 mbar, an inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) of 0.4 and a respiratory rate of 15-20/minute to achieve end-tidal CO2 partial pressures of 35–40 mmHg. Anaesthesia was maintained with continuous i.v. fentanyl (5–30μg/kg/hour) and propofol (4–8 mg/kg/hour). A 4-French (F) sheath was placed into a femoral artery for continuous invasive pressure and blood gas measurement. A 6F sheath inserted into a femoral vein was used to administer fluids (10-15ml/kg/h lactated Ringer’s Solution) and medication. The right jugular vein was cannulated with a 11F sheath to insert a catheter in the coronary sinus, whose correct position was confirmed by tactile feedback from the cardiac surgeon. Continuous monitoring included pulse oximetry (SpO2) and capnography, standard 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and invasive arterial blood pressure. After i.v. anti-thrombotic (heparin 5000 IU) and anti-arrhythmic (75 mg amiodarone) prophylaxis, a left lateral thoracotomy was performed. An MR-compatible perivascular flow probe (Transit-time perivascular flowmeter, Type TS420, Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA) was then attached onto the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD).
Experimental protocol
Animals were transferred to a clinical 3 Tesla MRI (Magnetom Trio, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany), and placed in supine position. A mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 70mmHg (±5mmHg) was defined as baseline status for the study and all subsequent analyses, assumed to be within coronary autoregulatory limits at normoxaemia and normocapnia. A cine short-axis stack was acquired for analysis of baseline left ventricular (LV) function. As the intervention, MAP was manipulated in 10-15mmHg increments by dose variation of the α1-receptor agonist phenylephrine (16–660μg/min per infusion pump) or by administration of the α1-receptor antagonist urapidil (5-10mg repetitive i.v.) as required by each individual subject. For reasons of hemodynamic stability, MAP level sequence was not randomized but hypotensive MAP levels were targeted first. Urapidil was administered until blood pressure could not be further lowered, then phenylephrine dose was increased until the ceiling effect precluded any further increase in MAP. After reaching a predefined MAP level, hemodynamics were allowed to stabilize for at least 30 seconds. Data acquisition started after fluctuation in LAD blood flow (QLAD) had subsided. OS-CMR scans were performed in two short axis slices downstream to the blood flow probe (imaging parameters and analysis see S1 File). Blood gas samples were obtained simultaneously from arterial and coronary sinus catheters after the scan had commenced. During pharmacological interventions, QLAD, arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded continuously. At the end of experiments, animals were euthanized with i.v. overdose of propofol and potassium chloride.
Calculations derived from blood gases and myocardial blood flow
Arterial (CaO2) and coronary sinus (CcsO2) oxygen content, DO2, MVO2, difference in DO2 and MVO2, oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER), oxygen excess (Ω) and myocardial lactate production were calculated as outlined in S1 File.
Image and statistical analysis
To analyse myocardial oxygenation changes at OS-CMR for each level of MAP, signal intensity (SI) of each OS-CMR image was obtained, requiring consensus of two readers, by drawing endocardial and epicardial contours at end-systole. This was primarily reported for the global myocardial value. The LAD specific territory was also analysed for comparison with MAP, QLAD and the derived DO2. This was obtained by automatic segmentation (segments 1, 2, 7 and 8) by the imaging software according to the AHA 17 segment model[37]. Change of within-subject OS-CMR signal intensity (OS-SI) and of oximetry data was reported as relative change (percent) from the baseline level (MAP of 70mmHg).
Data was assessed for normality using a D’Agostino-Pearson test. Results are given as mean ± standard deviation. Response of dependent variables to changes in MAP was analysed for linearity or curvi-linearity, and the model with the smallest sum-of-squares was chosen as best fit. Analysis accounted for multiple within-subject comparisons. For additional statistical modelling, linearity was assumed. To investigate the linear relationship between relative changes from baseline in variables DO2, MVO2, O2ER and ScsO2 to both myocardial oxygenation and MAP, a within-subjects correlation coefficient was determined to account for repeated measurements within each animal[38], using the ‘rmcorr’ package with R software (version 3.4.4). The primary statistical outcome described the relationship between global OS-CMR changes and MAP. Further statistical analysis used Graphpad Prism (version 7, Graphpad Inc. San Diego, California, USA). Results were considered significant at p<0.05 (two-tailed).
Ethics statement
This study was conducted in accordance with national animal care regulations and approved by the Veterinary Services at the Department of Agriculture and Nature of the Canton Bern, Switzerland [#BE 103/14].
Results
Imaging lasted between 60–256 minutes. Ten animals provided full datasets. Two more were excluded due to experimental hardware problems. Another two had episodes of ventricular fibrillation, and one suffered from peri-myocarditis as discovered during surgery. All animals with full datasets had an LV function normal for swine (Table 1)[39]. Animals did not show bradycardic responses to induced hypertension. Neither treatment with urapidil nor phenylephrine had an effect on heart rate (r = -0.109, p = 0.289). The data passed normality distribution tests.
Table 1. Baseline left-ventricular (LV) function parameters assessed by CMR.
Parameter | Mean ± SD |
---|---|
EDV (ml) | 57 ±11 |
ESV (ml) | 27 ±10 |
SV (ml) | 29±5 |
EF (ml) | 53±10 |
CO (L/min) | 2.4±0.4 |
HR (bpm) | 80±16 |
LV Mass (g) | 64±10 |
End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), LV mass.
Coronary artery blood flow and limits of autoregulation
LAD flow (QLAD) response to MAP changes was best explained by a curvi-linear model (Fig 1). Since QLAD was recorded throughout the entire experiment, 55’368 data points were available with MAP ranging between 194mmHg and 16mmHg. These extremes were associated with a QLAD of 80ml/min and 0ml/min, respectively. Stable MAP levels during periods of CMR and oximetry acquisition ranged from 28-196mmHg and corresponded to QLAD ranging between 8 and 64ml/min.
Fig 1. LAD blood flow and myocardial oxygenation across the tested range of mean arterial pressure.
A. Absolute LAD blood flow (ml/min) (n = 10 animals, each represented by a different colour). There is a plateau indicating autoregulation between MAP of 52–127 mmHg, with steeper slopes outside these limits (n = 55’368 data points). B. Global oxygenation-sensitive signal intensity (%-OS-SI) responds non-linearly to increasing MAP (n = 94). Above a MAP of 160 mmHg there was larger variation in OS-SI response. C. Regional signal intensity response is shown for myocardial territories subtended by the LAD.
The center of the fitted pressure-flow relationship (MAP-QLAD) was determined at MAP of 89mmHg (see Figure A in S1 File for detailed explanation of fitting and calculation). Within this autoregulatory range, QLAD varied 19±1% (19.0±0.3ml/min) and 23±1% (28.0±0.5ml/min) from QLAD at the centre of the autoregulatory range (23ml/min).
Linear fitting from continuous measurements in ten animals indicated good correlation between absolute QLAD and MAP data (r = 0.750, p<0.001). The flow response [%] compared to baseline flow at 70mmHg MAP revealed a similar correlation to MAP (r = 0.772, p<0.001). Relationships of MAP and flow for defined blood pressure levels, where blood gas measurements and OS-CMR scans occurred, can be seen in Table 2.
Table 2. Within subject correlation coefficients.
MAP | %OS-SIGlobal | %OS-SILAD | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | p-value | r | p-value | r | p-value | |
%-OS-SIGlobal | 0.326 | 0.002* | - | - | - | - |
%-OS-SILAD | 0.604 | <0.001* | - | - | - | - |
%-Flow (QLAD) | 0.699 | <0.001* | 0.452 | <0.001* | 0.651 | <0.001* |
ΔDO2 | 0.784 | <0.001* | 0.361 | 0.002* | 0.586 | <0.001* |
ΔMvO2 | 0.820 | <0.001* | 0.228 | 0.082 | - | - |
ΔDO2 - ΔMvO2 | 0.795 | <0.001* | 0.433 | <0.001* | - | - |
ΔScsO2 | 0.301 | 0.012* | 0.402 | 0.001* | - | - |
ΔΩ | 0.335 | 0.005* | 0.290 | 0.024* | - | - |
ΔO2er | -0.342 | 0.018* | -0.290 | 0.024* | - | - |
All measures of cardiac oxygenation and LAD blood flow were linearly associated with change in MAP. Invasively derived measures were linearly associated with global OS-CMR response (%-OS-SIGlobal) except ΔMvO2.
The OS-CMR response of the LAD specific territory (%-OS-SILAD) was compared to MAP, QLAD and ΔDO2 only. r = within-subjects Pearson’s co-efficient.
*p<0.05.
Balance of myocardial oxygen supply and demand derived from invasive measurements
Results of the univariate analysis for changes in global oxygenation balance parameters with MAP variation are listed in Table 2. Regional analysis showed significant correlation between %OS-SI in LAD perfused territories and LAD blood flow (r = 0.651, p<0.001). Fig 2 depicts the moderate increase of DO2 and MVO2 within the autoregulation zone, and a steep rise beyond its upper limit, where ΔDO2 increased more than ΔMvO2. Towards hypotension, oxygen supply and demand became progressively mismatched, i.e. ΔDO2 decreased more than ΔMVO2. MAP dependent changes in ΔScsO2, ΔΩ and ΔO2ER levelled in a MAP range between approximately 90 and 180mmHg. MAP below 80 mmHg resulted in steeply rising ΔO2ER and falling ΔScsO2 and ΔΩ. Absolute measurements are given in Figure B in S1 File. No increase in myocardial lactate production was observed in relation to MAP.
Fig 2. Non-linear response of descriptors of myocardial oxygenation balance to pharmacologically induced blood pressure changes.
A. Response of oxygen delivery (ΔDO2, red, n = 88) and myocardial oxygen consumption (ΔMVO2, dark blue, n = 74) relative to their baseline (arbitrarily set at a MAP of 70mmHg). Both, ΔDO2 and ΔMVO2 reveal an autoregulatory plateau and steep slopes beyond autoregulatory limits. Within the autoregulation zone, DO2 consistently surpasses MVO2, whereas there is mismatch between DO2 and MVO2 outside autoregulatory limits. At hypotension, ΔMVO2 is no more matched by ΔDO2, while there is redundant oxygen supply at hypertensive MAP beyond 130 mmHg. B. Curvilinear response to MAP variation of arterio-venous difference (ΔDO2 - ΔMVO2; purple n = 74) and myocardial oxygenation response (%OS-SI; green, n = 94). Note upslope beyond autoregulatory limits. C. Curvilinear response to MAP of coronary sinus oxygen saturation (ScsO2, purple, n = 75) and D. oxygen excess Ω (blue, n = 75). E. MAP-associated OS-SI rise is accompanied by falling coronary blood oxygen extraction ratio (O2eER, black, n = 75), due to improving DO2. x-axis intercept of fitted curves is at a MAP of 50-60mmHg. This indicates the lower limit of autoregulation and is consistent with calculated limits (see S1 File). Line: fitted mean of non-linear regression; shaded area: 95% confidence interval.
Myocardial tissue oxygenation assessed with OS-CMR
OS-CMR image quality was acceptable at a 9.1% exclusion rate. Of the 103 levels scanned during the series, nine data sets from five animals were excluded because of poor image quality, resulting in 94 levels available for analysis. OS-SI derived myocardial oxygenation changes of all animals across MAP levels are given in Fig 1B and 1C and Table 2. Global analysis (OS-SIGlobal) gave a range across all MAP levels of 18.6% (-9.0% to +10.6%). Regional LAD specific range (OS-SILAD) was 24.2% (-9.3% to +14.9%). Myocardial oxygenation decreased when MAP dropped below a lower autoregulation limit at approximately 50-60mmHg. The subtraction map (Fig 3) shows myocardial oxygenation changing during a representative experiment, when MAP departed from the 70mmHg baseline. The colour overlay demonstrates that myocardial oxygenation increased when MAP rises above 70mmHg, while it progressively deteriorates with hypotension.
Fig 3. Myocardial oxygenation response at OS-CMR.
In this individual animal, colour maps represent percent change of signal intensity (OS-SI) in systolic OS-CMR images in comparison to baseline. At nadir MAP of 35 mmHg there is relative de-oxygenation of -6.2% (black, purple). Relative OS-SI increases to a maximum of +6.4% at a MAP of 125mmHg (green, yellow). In this animal relative OS-SI responds in close association with blood flow (top left). Colour maps are generated for visual representation only (neurolens.org). The bottom left panel demonstrates analysed myocardium (on the raw OS-CMR image, between green and red contour) in a systolic mid-papillary short-axis slice at a baseline MAP of 69mmHg.
Variation from baseline of ΔScsO2 ranged from -31 to 21%, and of ΔO2ER from -9.6 to 19.3%. The fitted curve of OS-SIGlobal changes (Fig 2B) also revealed a curvilinear response to MAP manipulation, with reciprocal behavior of O2ER. (Fig 2A). Global myocardial oxygenation parallels flow within autoregulatory limits but uncouples outside autoregulation limits (Fig 1B), affecting ΔScsO2 and ΔΩ. The LAD oxygenation curve (Fig 1C) matches MAP better below the lower autoregulation limit than OS-SIGlobal.
Discussion
This study relates myocardial oxygenation changes, as assessed with non-invasive Oxygenation-Sensitive CMR imaging, to established parameters such as DO2, MvO2, ScsO2, Ω and O2ER and MAP. Myocardial oxygenation data determined non-invasively using OS-CMR correlated systematically with physiological parameters of coronary O2 supply and myocardial demand. Notably, similar to established invasive parameters, OS-CMR was able to identify compromise of myocardial oxygenation balance below the lower autoregulation boundary, as indicated by a decrease in OS-SI. All parameters also identified relative luxury perfusion at high mean arterial pressures.
Effects of phenylephrine and urapidil on coronary artery motion
For manipulating MAP in this model we preferred phenylephrine over noradrenaline. Although norepinephrine primarily binds to alpha-1 receptors on smooth muscles, induces vasoconstriction and may elicit baroreceptor-mediated bradycardia, it also has beta-adrenergic effects and may increase heart rate with higher concentrations. In preliminary experiments to this study in swine, norepinephrine administration resulted in a marked increase in heart rate, which would have confounded DO2 and MVO2. Importantly, in a porcine animal model it has been demonstrated to also elicit a direct vasoconstrictive effect on coronary arteries [40]. Phenylephrine is a synthetic selective alpha-1-receptor agonist. It has been shown in canine, porcine and human studies to exert no or minimal vasoconstricting effects on coronary arteries [40–42]. The characteristics of the MAP-QLAD relationship in our study indicated that the use of phenylephrine had no relevant effect on coronary vasomotor tone itself and thus had no confounding effects. Also, urapidil did not induce relaxation of porcine coronary arteries according to data of Bopp et al [43]. Thus, direct effects on coronary vascular tone by the agents chosen for MAP manipulation appear unlikely in our experimental setup of pharmacologically induced systemic blood pressure changes.
Impact of systemic blood pressure changes on myocardial perfusion
In healthy hearts, an acute rise of systemic blood pressure increases left ventricular afterload, myocardial workload but also coronary blood flow. Increasing myocardial blood flow enhances DO2 to match rising MVO2, compensating for higher myocardial workload [2]. However, myocardial O2 balance may become compromised when the rise of systemic arterial resistance increases LV myocardial workload so much that at very high MAP, MVO2 can exhaust DO2 and tissue oxygenation becomes critical [15]. A crucial factor for microvascular blood flow in the heart is extravascular pressure exerted on the microvasculature by myocardial wall tension [3,44]. Wall tension depends on end-diastolic filling pressure, wall thickness, ventricular dimension, heart rate and contractility [2,3]. The left ventricular pressure during systole has to surpass the aortic diastolic blood pressure in order to eject the blood through the aortic valve. In contrast to the right ventricle, systolic intraventricular pressure in the LV is higher than the pressure in the microvessels (20-30mmHg) in the healthy individual [6], which leads to a cessation of myocardial blood flow in systole especially in sub-endocardium [3]. With increasing systemic blood pressure, microvascular blood flow and oxygenation may thus become gradually compromised [9]. Although the sub-epicardial zones are perfused during diastole and systole, higher pressures and increased inotropy may affect these layers during systolic contraction alike. Since especially sub-endocardial blood flow occurs in diastole, an increase in heart rate with a corresponding shortening of the diastolic phase may further compromise blood flow. Significant heart rate changes during blood pressure manipulation could be avoided successfully in this study.
Myocardial oxygen balance assessed by invasively obtained parameters
As seen in Fig 2, with increasing MAP levels DO2 already increases discretely more than MVO2 within the autoregulation zone, but even more pronounced beyond the upper autoregulation zone limit, indicating luxury perfusion. DO2 and MVO2 however are not direct measurements of myocardial oxygenation and are driven by calculation of blood gases and myocardial blood flow. Therefore, other factors influencing such variables will confound DO2 and MVO2 calculation, i.e. isolated changes in systemic blood gases due to changes in ventilation. Thus, some reviews question the utility and accuracy of these calculations [45,46]. Importantly, changes in systemic paO2 and paCO2 are known to affect coronary vascular tone. They may thus affect myocardial blood flow and deflect the steady state in metabolically coupled coronary blood flow. Increased paCO2 is a potent coronary arteriolar vasodilator [47], while an increase in paO2 is known to have vasoconstricting properties. These effects have also been investigated with OS-CMR, showing changes in myocardial oxygenation [30,31,34]. Thus, systemic blood gas changes may confound results in DO2 and MvO2 calculations.
Since DO2 increases more than MVO2 with rising MAP, indicating luxury perfusion, the excess flow Q is also factored into the MVO2 calculation. This may therefore lead to overestimation of MVO2. This should in fact lead to reduced oxygen extraction and stable or increasing levels in ScsO2 and consequently Ω. Especially with the steep increase in DO2 at very high MAP, accuracy of MVO2 may be inaccurate and overestimated. Of note, with MAP decreasing, absolute DO2 is still greater than MVO2 (Figure B in S1 File), until their trends intercept at 35mmHg MAP. As ΔDO2 and ΔMVO2 indicate, blood pressures below the autoregulation zone tip the oxygenation balance when DO2 drops below MVO2, leading to a myocardial oxygenation deficit [15]. This is paralleled by the steep decrease of ΔScsO2, Ω, and increase of ΔO2er. With higher MAP both parameters level out. Of note, ΔO2er increases sharply at around 100mmHg with falling MAP. This does not fit the concept of a tightly regulated blood flow within the autoregulation zone to maintain stable oxygenation.
As a useful but indirect marker of whole-body oxygenation balance, mixed venous oxygen saturation (70–75%) measured in the pulmonary artery [48] cannot resolve organ-specific oxygen supply-demand mismatch [49]. In analogy, the coronary sinus drains venous blood with a baseline saturation of approximately 30–40% from the heart, reflectant of nearly maximum oxygen extraction from coronary influx by myocardium (Figure B in S1 File). Coronary sinus blood oximetry therefore does not allow assessment of regional supply-demand mismatch, either. Any method that can reliably and non-invasively detect such mismatch in defined myocardial territories would appear quite useful.
Changes of myocardial oxygenation assessed by OS-CMR
OS-CMR can assess myocardial oxygenation directly and non-invasively. It does not rely on exogenous contrast or tracers accompanied by exposure to ionizing radiation. It has a sufficiently high spatial resolution to assess regional oxygenation [20]. There are different ways to assess this in myocardium using CMR. For instance, mapping techniques generate quantitative data which can be used to assess blood [50] and tissue oxygenation [23]. However, such sequences lack the temporal resolution, which is necessary for many experiments, and they are artifact-prone at higher magnetic field strengths. Our experimental setup required fast image acquisition, since maintenance of very hypertensive MAP levels for a sufficiently long period of time turned out to be challenging. Using an OS-cine sequence as reported in previous studies offered sufficient temporal resolution but came with the disadvantage that quantitative T2 or T2* values like in mapping techniques could not be generated [32,51]. However, changes in OS-SI were determined in reference to a baseline, and were compared to other parameters. Several studies used this technique before in experimental and clinical work [20],[24]. It has also been successfully used to interrogate the myocardium for regional deoxygenation in patients with coronary artery disease [27,52].
We assume that the inflection of the myocardial oxygenation curve below approximately 50–60 mmHg MAP in our study indicates the lower limit of coronary autoregulation. This is supported by invasive measurements. The association appeared even closer with LAD specific OS-CMR analysis. OS-CMR also confirms and reflects invasive data that myocardial oxygenation does not become compromised in healthy animals by induced hypertension. Analysis of correlations show that changes of OS-SI were best explained by proportional change of QLAD, ΔDO2-ΔMVO2 and ΔScsO2. Similar findings have been reported in a validation study by Vöhringer et al. using OS-CMR to detect acute coronary artery stenosis. These authors compared OS-SI changes with flow and coronary sinus haemoglobin saturation, and found a linear correlation of OS-SI changes with ScsO2 changes [24]. OS-SI changes were also validated in vitro against venous blood oxygen saturation [36]. These and other studies have shown a close relationship between OS-SI and changes in blood oxygenation [29].
Above studies used sequence parameters and field strengths, which differed from our study. The modification of our MRI sequences accelerated image acquisition at the cost of reduced oxygenation sensitivity. A global myocardial oxygenation change of 18.6% at OS-CMR, respectively 24.2% for the LAD territory, means a significant deviation from baseline in capillaries under physiologic condition. However, OS data do not directly translate into coronary sinus saturation (total range 52.3%) but appear to closer match ΔO2er (total range 28.9%).
Spatial resolution of the sequence we used is, at 2x2x10mm, quite good. New advances using higher field strengths may offer new opportunities in oxygenation-sensitive imaging [53,54].
Our study shows, for instance, that OS-CMR has potential not only for evaluation of myocardial oxygenation in a variety of cardiac diseases. It may also be useful in cardiovascular drug trials, which investigate direct or indirect effects of such agents on myocardial oxygenation. OS-SI characteristics identified a similar lower autoregulation limit, intersected the x-axis at 50-60mmHg, and detected the oxygenation decline at lower blood pressure. LAD specific sub-analysis revealed a stronger loss of myocardial oxygenation below that limit, which appears consistent with decreasing blood flow (Fig 1C). Also, OS-CMR did not indicate compromised myocardial oxygenation at higher MAP. OS-CMR may also become an approach to revisit the effects of cardiovascular drugs. In the future, higher field strengths may provide us with even more layers of information.
Limitations
This work has important limitations. First, it does not necessarily reflect human physiology, although autoregulation limits observed by us resemble the ones reported for humans [7]. Further, our autoregulation limits are similar to the ones reported for swine in the publication of Dick et al [8]. Anaesthetic agents could have attenuated the blood pressure response to phenylephrine and urapidil. There was quite a heterogeneity of the blood pressure. The time-frame was sufficient for obtaining OS images, but not of image stacks to look at concomitant changes in LV volumes, ejection fraction and cardiac output.
Also, we were only able to measure blood flow in the proximal LAD coronary artery but not the other two major vascular territories. This is also a limitation for the accuracy of DO2 and MVO2 calculations representing oxygenation balance of the entire myocardium.
OS-CMR analysis was performed at end-systole, as there is more myocardial tissue to analyse and usually fewer artefacts. Moreover, oxygen extraction is highest during systole in postcapillary haemoglobin, which therefore may best depict oxygenation balance in OS-CMR. Analysis during diastole would also be interesting since LV myocardial perfusion occurs mainly in this phase. Currently, the limited sampling of pixels renders this type of analysis still unprecise. More advanced OS-CMR sequences may overcome this problem in the future.
Last, in our model we used healthy animals to show that myocardial oxygenation is not compromised while increased coronary blood flow compensated for the increased myocardial workload. This may not be the case in hypertensive patients with hypertrophic or dilatative cardiomyopathies, coronary heart disease and heart failure. There, oxygen supply may fail to meet the increased oxygen demand.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that OS-CMR can be used to evaluate physiological effects or cardiovascular drug action on myocardial oxygenation in a non-invasive setting. In this healthy animal model, increasing mean arterial blood pressure did not compromise myocardial oxygenation despite increased cardiac workload and oxygen demand. OS-CMR was also able to identify insufficient oxygenation at blood pressures below the lower limit of autoregulation. OS-CMR, as a direct measure of myocardial oxygenation, may be superior to conventional invasive assessments of the myocardial oxygenation balance. More data is required to support this hypothesis.
Supporting information
a. Calculations derived from blood gases and myocardial blood flow
b. CMR sequences & image analysis
Figure A in S1 File. Identification of the auto-regulation zone.
The flow curve was generated by 55’368 data points from measurements of the left anterior descending coronary artery during manipulation of mean arterial blood pressures. A non-linear regression curve was fit to the data accounting for repeated measurements per subject. This resulting curve always demonstrates a positive slope at any MAP measurement used in the study, with a flatter slope in the middle of the curve, and a higher slope at both ends (y = 0.00004154x3–0.01115x2 + 1.076x – 13.34). Both the inflection point (center) of the curve, and the lower and upper limits of the autoregulation zone were obtained through the calculation of the first and second derivative of the flow curve.
Calculation of the inflection point:
A. The inflection point determining the center of the curve in the plateau region was obtained by calculating the x-intercept of the second derivative, which yielded a MAP of 89mmHg (dotted green line). This value could also be obtained from the lowest value of the first derivative (C). On the flow curve (B), this blood pressure of 89mmHg resulted in an absolute flow value of 23ml/min.
Calculation of the autoregulation zone:
The limits of the autoregulation zone were defined as the point on the flow curve, where the slope of the tangent to the curve reached a first derivative measurement of 0.25 indicating departure from the plateau of the curve(D). On the curve, this slope occurred at two locations. Through the first derivative (C), these two locations were determined as 52mmHg (blue) for the lower limit of the autoregulation zone and 127mmHg (red) as the upper limit. When using the original flow curve, the flow between those two boundary points of the autoregulation zone resulted in a flow range from 19±0.3 to 28±0.5ml/min, which corresponds into a %-difference in flow of -19±1% and 23±1% from the center of the autoregulatory range (23ml/min) (E).
Figure B in S1 File. Absolute measurements of blood oxygen parameters.
Absolute measurements of parameters derived from blood gas samples are displayed for each level (95 data-points). A. The oxygen supply (DO2, red) is greater than the myocardial oxygen consumption (MvO2, blue) for the majority of the blood pressure range, until 35mmHg, when then lines intersect. It was also at this point animals became hemodynamically unstable. This is shown where the curve crosses the X-axis in panel B., which is the difference between DO2 and MvO2. C. displays the measurements of coronary sinus hemoglobin saturation (ScsO2), while D. shows the calculation of the oxygen surplus factor Ω. This calculation is traditionally done for mixed venous saturations and arterial oxygen saturations in a more clinically feasible and simplified way (SaO2/(SaO2-SvO2)), where Ω <2 indicates insufficient systemic perfusion, Ω 3.6–4.2 normal systemic perfusion and values >>2 sufficient perfusion. Panel E. displays the oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) of the myocardium. The non-linear regression lines demonstrate that both measurements are fairly stable across the MAP range, until blood pressure drops to about 60mmHg, in which DO2-MVO2, ScsO2 and Ω drop, while O2ER rises.
(DOCX)
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful for the assistance of the Experimental Surgery Unit of the Inselspital, Department of Clinical Research and to the research lab of Sarah Longnus-Henning of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery for providing us with materials and lending us their blood gas analyser. We are also indebted to Stefan Huettenmoser and Melanie Artho for their help during the experiments.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by institutional funds of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine at the Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern and the Foundation for Research in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in Bern, Switzerland.
References
- 1.Collins P. Coronary flow reserve. Br Heart J. 1993;69: 279–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Duncker DJ, Bache RJ. Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise. Physiol Rev. 2008;88: 1009–1086. 10.1152/physrev.00045.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schelbert HR. Anatomy and physiology of coronary blood flow. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17: 545–554. 10.1007/s12350-010-9255-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mosher P, Ross J, Mcfate PA, Shaw RF. CONTROL OF CORONARY BLOOD FLOW BY AN AUTOREGULATORY MECHANISM. Circ Res. 1964;14: 250–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bayliss WM. On the local reactions of the arterial wall to changes of internal pressure. J Physiol. 1902;28: 220–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pries AR, Badimon L, Bugiardini R, Camici PG, Dorobantu M, Duncker DJ, et al. Coronary vascular regulation, remodelling, and collateralization: mechanisms and clinical implications on behalf of the working group on coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation. Eur Heart J. 2015;36: 3134–3146. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ramanathan T, Skinner H. Coronary blood flow. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2005;5: 61–64. 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mki012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dick GM, Namani R, Patel B, Kassab GS. Role of Coronary Myogenic Response in Pressure-Flow Autoregulation in Swine: A Meta-Analysis With Coronary Flow Modeling. Front Physiol. 2018;9 10.3389/fphys.2018.00580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ardehali A, Ports TA. Myocardial oxygen supply and demand. Chest. 1990;98: 699–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Berne RM, Rubio R. Regulation of coronary blood flow. Adv Cardiol. 1974;12: 303–317. 10.1159/000395474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kralios AC, Tsagaris TJ, Kuida H. Myocardial oxygen consumption at constant left ventricular workload and varying arterial oxygenation. Cardiovasc Res. 1975;9: 811–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Delaye J, Mpetshi I, Durand JP. [Oxygen requirements of the myocardium]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1983;76 Spec No: 7–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang J, Shan C, Zhang YU, Zhou X, Li J, Li Y, et al. Blood gas analysis of the coronary sinus in patients with heart failure. Biomed Rep. 2015;3: 379–382. 10.3892/br.2015.446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Iizuka K, Nishinaka T, Takewa Y, Yamazaki K, Tatsumi E. The influence of pump rotation speed on hemodynamics and myocardial oxygen metabolism in left ventricular assist device support with aortic valve regurgitation. J Artif Organs Off J Jpn Soc Artif Organs. 2017;20: 194–199. 10.1007/s10047-017-0960-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McLellan SA, Walsh TS. Oxygen delivery and haemoglobin. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2004;4: 123–126. 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkh033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boehme S, Duenges B, Klein KU, Hartwich V, Mayr B, Consiglio J, et al. Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e60591 10.1371/journal.pone.0060591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Formenti F, Chen R, McPeak H, Murison PJ, Matejovic M, Hahn CEW, et al. Intra-breath arterial oxygen oscillations detected by a fast oxygen sensor in an animal model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114: 683–688. 10.1093/bja/aeu407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pauling L, Coryell CD. The Magnetic Properties and Structure of Hemoglobin, Oxyhemoglobin and Carbonmonoxyhemoglobin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1936;22: 210–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87: 9868–9872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Friedrich MG, Karamitsos TD. Oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15: 43 10.1186/1532-429X-15-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bauer WR, Nadler W, Bock M, Schad LR, Wacker C, Hartlep A, et al. Theory of the BOLD effect in the capillary region: an analytical approach for the determination of T2 in the capillary network of myocardium. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41: 51–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bauer WR, Nadler W, Bock M, Schad LR, Wacker C, Hartlep A, et al. The relationship between the BOLD-induced T(2) and T(2)(*): a theoretical approach for the vasculature of myocardium. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 1999;42: 1004–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wacker CM, Hartlep AW, Pfleger S, Schad LR, Ertl G, Bauer WR. Susceptibility-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging detects human myocardium supplied by a stenotic coronary artery without a contrast agent. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41: 834–840. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02931-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vöhringer M, Flewitt JA, Green JD, Dharmakumar R, Wang J Jr, Tyberg JV, et al. Oxygenation-sensitive CMR for assessing vasodilator-induced changes of myocardial oxygenation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12: 20 10.1186/1532-429X-12-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Karamitsos TD, Leccisotti L, Arnold JR, Recio-Mayoral A, Bhamra-Ariza P, Howells RK, et al. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3: 32–40. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.860148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Walcher T, Manzke R, Hombach V, Rottbauer W, Wöhrle J, Bernhardt P. Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Assessed by T2-Prepared Steady-State Free Precession Blood Oxygen Level–Dependent Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Comparison to Fractional Flow ReserveClinical Perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5: 580–586. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Luu JM, Friedrich MG, Harker J, Dwyer N, Guensch D, Mikami Y, et al. Relationship of vasodilator-induced changes in myocardial oxygenation with the severity of coronary artery stenosis: a study using oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15: 1358–1367. 10.1093/ehjci/jeu138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mahmod M, Francis JM, Pal N, Lewis A, Dass S, De Silva R, et al. Myocardial perfusion and oxygenation are impaired during stress in severe aortic stenosis and correlate with impaired energetics and subclinical left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16: 29 10.1186/1532-429X-16-29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Guensch DP, Fischer K, Flewitt JA, Friedrich MG. Myocardial oxygenation is maintained during hypoxia when combined with apnea—a cardiovascular MR study. Physiol Rep. 2013;1: e00098 10.1002/phy2.98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guensch DP, Fischer K, Shie N, Lebel J, Friedrich MG. Hyperoxia Exacerbates Myocardial Ischemia in the Presence of Acute Coronary Artery Stenosis in Swine. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8: e002928 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guensch DP, Fischer K, Flewitt JA, Yu J, Lukic R, Friedrich JA, et al. Breathing manoeuvre-dependent changes in myocardial oxygenation in healthy humans. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15: 409–414. 10.1093/ehjci/jet171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fischer K, Guensch DP, Friedrich MG. Response of myocardial oxygenation to breathing manoeuvres and adenosine infusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16: 395–401. 10.1093/ehjci/jeu202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang H-J, Yumul R, Tang R, Cokic I, Klein M, Kali A, et al. Assessment of myocardial reactivity to controlled hypercapnia with free-breathing T2-prepared cardiac blood oxygen level-dependent MR imaging. Radiology. 2014;272: 397–406. 10.1148/radiol.14132549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fischer K, Guensch DP, Shie N, Lebel J, Friedrich MG. Breathing Maneuvers as a Vasoactive Stimulus for Detecting Inducible Myocardial Ischemia—An Experimental Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study. PloS One. 2016;11: e0164524 10.1371/journal.pone.0164524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fieno DS, Shea SM, Li Y, Harris KR, Finn JP, Li D. Myocardial perfusion imaging based on the blood oxygen level-dependent effect using T2-prepared steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2004;110: 1284–1290. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140673.13057.34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Guensch DP, Nadeshalingam G, Fischer K, Stalder AF, Friedrich MG. The impact of hematocrit on oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18: 42 10.1186/s12968-016-0262-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Donato P, Coelho P, Santos C, Bernardes A, Caseiro-Alves F. Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary anatomy obtained by multi-detector computed tomography: an ex vivo contribution. Surg Radiol Anat SRA. 2012;34: 805–810. 10.1007/s00276-012-0976-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bakdash JZ, Marusich LR. Repeated Measures Correlation. Front Psychol. 2017;8 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Paslawska U, Noszczyk-Nowak A, Paslawski R, Janiszewski A, Kiczak L, Zysko D, et al. Normal electrocardiographic and echocardiographic (M-mode and two-dimensional) values in Polish Landrace pigs. Acta Vet Scand. 2014;56 10.1186/s13028-014-0054-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kurosawa H, Seto Y, Wakamatsu H, Sato Y, Takase S, Omata S, et al. Effects of phenylephrine and noradrenaline on coronary artery motion in an open-chest porcine beating heart model. Surg Today. 2014;44: 1128–1137. 10.1007/s00595-013-0639-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vargas Pelaez AF, Gao Z, Ahmad TA, Leuenberger UA, Proctor DN, Maman SR, et al. Effect of adrenergic agonists on coronary blood flow: a laboratory study in healthy volunteers. Physiol Rep. 2016;4 10.14814/phy2.12806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Abdel-Latif M, Kim SJ, Salem MR, Crystal GJ. Phenylephrine does not limit myocardial blood flow or oxygen delivery during isoflurane-induced hypotension in dogs. Anesth Analg. 1992;74: 870–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bopp C, Auger C, Diemunsch P, Schini-Kerth V. The effect of urapidil, an alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist and a 5-HT1A agonist, on the vascular tone of the porcine coronary and pulmonary arteries, the rat aorta and the human pulmonary artery. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;779: 53–58. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang Z, Tendulkar A, Sun K, Stander N, Saloner DA, Wallace AW, et al. Comparison of Young Laplace law and finite element based calculation of ventricular wall stress: Implications for post infarct and surgical ventricular remodeling. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91: 150–156. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.06.132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vincent J-L, Backer DD. Oxygen transport—the oxygen delivery controversy Applied Physiology in Intensive Care Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2006. pp. 337–343. 10.1007/3-540-37363-2_48 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Caille V, Squara P. Oxygen uptake-to-delivery relationship: a way to assess adequate flow. Crit Care. 2006;10: S4 10.1186/cc4831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Beaudin AE, Brugniaux JV, Vöhringer M, Flewitt J, Green JD, Friedrich MG, et al. Cerebral and myocardial blood flow responses to hypercapnia and hypoxia in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301: H1678–1686. 10.1152/ajpheart.00281.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kandel G, Aberman A. Mixed venous oxygen saturation. Its role in the assessment of the critically ill patient. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143: 1400–1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.van Beest P, Wietasch G, Scheeren T, Spronk P, Kuiper M. Clinical review: use of venous oxygen saturations as a goal—a yet unfinished puzzle. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2011;15: 232 10.1186/cc10351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Varghese J, Potter LC, LaFountain R, Pan X, Raman SV, Ahmad R, et al. CMR-based blood oximetry via multi-parametric estimation using multiple T2 measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19 10.1186/s12968-017-0403-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dharmakumar R, Qi X, Hong J, Wright GA. Detecting microcirculatory changes in blood oxygen state with steady-state free precession imaging. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2006;55: 1372–1380. 10.1002/mrm.20911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fischer K, Yamaji K, Luescher S, Ueki Y, Jung B, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to detect oxygenation deficits in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease triggered by breathing maneuvers. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20 10.1186/s12968-018-0446-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Karamat MI, Darvish-Molla S, Santos-Diaz A. Opportunities and Challenges of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2016;44: 73–89. 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2016016365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Frauenrath T, Prothmann M, Dieringer MA, Hezel F, Renz W, et al. Cardiac chamber quantification using magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla—a pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2010;20: 2844–2852. 10.1007/s00330-010-1888-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
a. Calculations derived from blood gases and myocardial blood flow
b. CMR sequences & image analysis
Figure A in S1 File. Identification of the auto-regulation zone.
The flow curve was generated by 55’368 data points from measurements of the left anterior descending coronary artery during manipulation of mean arterial blood pressures. A non-linear regression curve was fit to the data accounting for repeated measurements per subject. This resulting curve always demonstrates a positive slope at any MAP measurement used in the study, with a flatter slope in the middle of the curve, and a higher slope at both ends (y = 0.00004154x3–0.01115x2 + 1.076x – 13.34). Both the inflection point (center) of the curve, and the lower and upper limits of the autoregulation zone were obtained through the calculation of the first and second derivative of the flow curve.
Calculation of the inflection point:
A. The inflection point determining the center of the curve in the plateau region was obtained by calculating the x-intercept of the second derivative, which yielded a MAP of 89mmHg (dotted green line). This value could also be obtained from the lowest value of the first derivative (C). On the flow curve (B), this blood pressure of 89mmHg resulted in an absolute flow value of 23ml/min.
Calculation of the autoregulation zone:
The limits of the autoregulation zone were defined as the point on the flow curve, where the slope of the tangent to the curve reached a first derivative measurement of 0.25 indicating departure from the plateau of the curve(D). On the curve, this slope occurred at two locations. Through the first derivative (C), these two locations were determined as 52mmHg (blue) for the lower limit of the autoregulation zone and 127mmHg (red) as the upper limit. When using the original flow curve, the flow between those two boundary points of the autoregulation zone resulted in a flow range from 19±0.3 to 28±0.5ml/min, which corresponds into a %-difference in flow of -19±1% and 23±1% from the center of the autoregulatory range (23ml/min) (E).
Figure B in S1 File. Absolute measurements of blood oxygen parameters.
Absolute measurements of parameters derived from blood gas samples are displayed for each level (95 data-points). A. The oxygen supply (DO2, red) is greater than the myocardial oxygen consumption (MvO2, blue) for the majority of the blood pressure range, until 35mmHg, when then lines intersect. It was also at this point animals became hemodynamically unstable. This is shown where the curve crosses the X-axis in panel B., which is the difference between DO2 and MvO2. C. displays the measurements of coronary sinus hemoglobin saturation (ScsO2), while D. shows the calculation of the oxygen surplus factor Ω. This calculation is traditionally done for mixed venous saturations and arterial oxygen saturations in a more clinically feasible and simplified way (SaO2/(SaO2-SvO2)), where Ω <2 indicates insufficient systemic perfusion, Ω 3.6–4.2 normal systemic perfusion and values >>2 sufficient perfusion. Panel E. displays the oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) of the myocardium. The non-linear regression lines demonstrate that both measurements are fairly stable across the MAP range, until blood pressure drops to about 60mmHg, in which DO2-MVO2, ScsO2 and Ω drop, while O2ER rises.
(DOCX)
(XLSX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.