Abstract
Introduction
The proportion of older persons in developing countries is increasing with no clear evidence of improvement in physical health. The aim of this paper was to examine the factors associated with older persons’ physical health in rural Uganda.
Methods
This paper is based on a cross-sectional study of 912 older persons age 60 years and older across four major regions of Uganda. The study was conceptualized basing on World Health Organization quality of life BREF (WHOQOL-BREF). Analysis was done at three levels, that is, frequency distributions were generated to describe background characteristics of respondents and cross-tabulations were done to determine associations between dependent and each of the independent variables. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of physical health.
Results
The likelihood of good physical health is high among older persons (Ops) who controlled their household assets (OR = 3.64; CI = 1.81–7.30) or the household assets controlled by their spouses (OR = 4.44; CI = 1.91–10.32) relative to those whose household assets were controlled by their children. There is high likelihood of good physical health among those who engage in physical activities (OR = 2.28; CI = 1.52–3.43) compared to those who do not.
Conclusion
The findings have various policy implications, including creating an enabling environment and building capacities of older persons to remain in control of their household assets. Interventions focusing on deepening sensitization of older persons about importance of physical exercises could be a viable strategy for improving physical health of older persons.
Introduction
Globally, human life expectancies have greatly improved with much progress happening in developing countries. It is projected that almost 80% of the world’s ageing population will be living in developing world [1]. The proportion of Africa’s older population is expected to increase from 5.1% in 2000 to 10.4% by 2050 [2, 3]. In sub-Saharan Africa, ageing population is taking place amidst challenges such as shortage of health infrastructure and services [4, 5]. This is worsened by the rise in non-communicable diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases and several other later life health difficulties [6, 7]. Basing on the United Nations (UN) definition of older persons as those age 60 years and older [3], this study examines factors associated with physical health among older persons in rural Uganda.
Uganda’s population is largely characterized by young people. Nonetheless, the country’s older population is increasing steadily due to the high rate of survival and reduction in adult mortality [8, 9]. Estimated at 63 years, Uganda’s life expectancy has surpassed sub-Saharan Africa’s average of 60 years [9, 10]. The number of Uganda’s older persons age 60 years and above almost doubled between 1991 and 2002 (from 686,000 to 1.1 million persons)and increased to 1.6 million in 2014 [9]. Older persons constitute 4 percent of the total population [11]. The increase in ageing population is however against the backdrop of deterioration of social and family support systems that sustain the physical health and wellbeing of older persons [12]. For instance, rural-urban migration has drastically affected the care and support rendered to older persons [8]. Moreover, the existing social problems such as unemployment limit families’ capacities to support rural older persons’ healthcare [7, 8, 13].
Physical health dimension is one of the key indicators of people’s quality of life [14]. It includes activities of daily living, mobility status, fatigue; body pain, and sleep [15]. Poor physical health is the source of fear and discomfort among OPs thereby curtailing their productivity and reducing them to beggars and dependents [12]. Although research underscores the importance of physical health for OPs, this area remains understudied in Uganda [2, 11]. Existing literature about ageing population has mainly focused on loneliness [16], vulnerability of older adults [17], chronic poverty among elderly [18], nutritional status and functional ability of the elderly [19] and understanding the vulnerability of older adults [13]. Moreover, some of these studies used data covering a limited geographical scope and collected some years back. It is expected that the factors that influence physical health could have changed over time. Empirical evidence regarding factors influencing physical health among OPs is lacking. This research builds on earlier studies [13, 15, 17, 18] to bridge this knowledge gap. Using a recent empirical data from a wide geographical scope, we examine the factors influencing physical health of older persons in rural Uganda.
Materials and methods
This paper utilized data from a cross sectional study on determinants of quality of life of 912 older men and women age 60 years and above in rural Uganda; representing a response rate (RR) of 95%. RR was calculated using the fourth formula from those recommended by the American association for Public Opinion Research [20]. The data were collected from February to March, 2017. Before data collection, enumerators with minimum qualification of a Bachelor’s degree were identified and recruited from respective study districts. These were trained on various aspects including research ethics, how to conduct interviews, and administering a questionnaire. Each interview took 35–45 minutes on average. During interviews, we made sure that we did not include persons who were sick. Multi-stage stratified cluster sampling approach was used. Uganda was stratified into four major regions namely; central, eastern, northern and western regions. Using simple random sampling, one district was selected from each of the four regions. In each district, three sub-counties were selected using simple random sampling. Four villages were selected using simple random sampling from each of the selected sub-counties, providing a total of 12 villages per district and hence 48 villages in the whole of Uganda. Using a community leader, a list of households with older persons was generated per village. Thereafter, ten households were randomly selected and older persons from 480 households were interviewed using an interviewer-administered questionnaire.
Physical health indicators were adapted from the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF instrument). The WHOQOL-BREF is a World Health organization instrument that measures physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment [15, 21].It consists of 26 items, 24 of which are divided into four domains: physical health, mental health, social relationships, and environment. This study adapted with modifications the indicators of physical health dimension of quality of life. The items under this dimension include activities of daily living, mobility status, fatigue; body pain, and sleep [15]. The WHOQOL-BREF was preferred because it is flexible and is used on people from different cultures.
Variables and measures
The dependent variable was physical health which was in form of an index. Independent variables were; age (60 years and older), sex (male or female), marital status (current marital status of respondent), region (region of residence), education level (education level acquired), religion (religion of respondent), type of house (whether house was permanent, semi-permanent or temporary), radio set ownership (whether respondent owned a radio or not), mobile phone ownership (whether respondent owned mobile phone or not), electricity (whether the respondent’s house had electricity or not), land ownership (whether responded owned land or not), control over household assets (who controlled household assets of the respondent), living arrangement (whether respondent lived alone or with others), financial support (whether respondent was financially supported or not), health care (who provided health care to respondent during sickness), distance to nearest health centre (distance of nearest health facility from respondent’s home in kilometers), HIV/AIDS sero-status (whether respondent was sero positive or sero negative), physical activity (whether respondent performed physical activities or not and fuel type (type of fuel used for cooking).
Data analysis
Frequency distributions were computed to describe background characteristics of the respondents. Cross tabulations were done to determine the association between physical health and independent variables. A chi-square test statistic with a corresponding p-value was used to establish the significance of the association between the two variables. The level of statistical significance was fixed at 95% confidence (p = 0.05). Sampling weights were calculated to correct for imperfections resulting from selection of units with unequal probabilities.
We employed factor analysis (FA) to create an index for physical health using the 5 different indicators of; activities of daily living (whether respondent participated in activities of daily living or not), mobility status (whether respondent experienced mobility challenges or not), fatigue (whether respondent experienced fatigue or not); body pain (whether respondent experienced body pain or not), and sleep (whether respondent experienced any difficulties while sleeping or not). Factor loadings were rotated using quartimin oblique method for the loadings to reveal a clear pattern or the simple structure [22]. The selection of this rotation method was made based upon its popularity in use and availability in statistical software which seeks to minimize complexity only within the indicator variables [23] The technique was thus used to look for variables that factor well together but also with notable loading magnitude in absolute terms. High correlation among these indicators helped to produce a lower number of latent variables that fit common patterns in the data. Basing on the number of factors extracted, an index for the identified factors was calculated through linear combination between observed and factor loadings. Bartlett test of sphericity and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) criterion [24] were performed to verify whether indicators in each category shared a common core. The Bartlett test was used to estimate the probability that the correlation matrix is zero, implying that all the variables are uncorrelated, while the KMO was used to indicate the extent to which variables had common feature to warrant factor analysis., KMO scores above 0.5 (threshold scores) were acceptable; scores above 0.9 were exceptional [25]. In this study, the analysis yielded a KMO value of 0.814, while the Bartlett test yielded = 7057.335 (p = 0.000), signifying the data’s adequacy for factor analysis.
Since the outcome variable formed through FA was in form of index, the study objective was achieved by use of the ordered logistic regression model. The dependent variable (Physical health) was grouped into three categories. That is, good, fair and poor basing on the range with which a respondent’s score laid. In this dimension of quality of life used in this study, individuals are expected to have varying levels of physical health with some better off or worse off than others. The strengths of the relationships were reported as odds ratios. The p-value was used to determine whether the relationship was significant or not depending on the level of significance which was fixed at 0.05.
Ethical considerations
Before data collection, ethical clearance was granted by National HIV/AIDS research committee (NARC, Ref: ARC 190), Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST, Ref: SS 4167) and Office of the President of the Republic of Uganda (Ref: ADM 194/212/01). While collecting data, voluntary written informed consent was obtained from all respondents prior to the interviews and participants were assured of confidentiality. All information was provided in the relevant local languages (Rukiga, Langi, Luganda and Lusoga).
Results and discussion
Descriptive characteristics of the older persons
Table 1 shows that the proportion of older persons reduced with advancement in age. The majority of the respondents (51%) were age 60–69 years. More than half of the respondents (57%) were females. Although five in every ten respondents (51%) were currently married, the level of widowhood was also noticeably high (40%). Regions were proportionately represented with central having the highest proportion (27%). More than a half (54%) had no formal education and 40% had primary education. The largest proportion (38%) of the respondents were affiliated to the Anglican faith, followed by Catholic (37%) and Muslims (13%); 69% were subsistence farmers by occupation. Over two-fifths (41%) were staying in permanent houses; 52% possessed radios; nearly three-quarters (73%) did not have mobile phones; 91% did not have electricity in for lighting in their houses; and 91% owned land for both agriculture and settlement. Majority of the respondents (76%) controlled their household resources and 74% lived with their children and grandchildren. Over half (56%) were not receiving financial support; 41% were getting healthcare support from their children; 48% travelled for 1–2 kilometers to reach the nearest health center; 97% were HIV sero negative; nearly three-quarters (74%) were engaging in physical activity; and 96% were using firewood as the main form of fuel for cooking. Respondents in the categories of physical health namely; good, fair and poor were equally represented (33%) as seen in Table 1.
Table 1. Percent distribution of respondents by selected socio-demographic characteristics.
Variable | Number | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|
Age | ||
60–69 | 462 | 50.7 |
70–79 | 290 | 31.8 |
80+ | 160 | 17.5 |
Sex | ||
Male | 395 | 43.3 |
Female | 517 | 56.7 |
Marital status | ||
Married | 461 | 50.6 |
Widowed | 361 | 39.5 |
Divorced/Separated | 90 | 9.9 |
Region | ||
Central | 248 | 27.2 |
East | 237 | 25.9 |
North | 190 | 20.8 |
West | 237 | 25.9 |
Education level | ||
No education | 495 | 54.3 |
Primary | 363 | 39.8 |
Secondary | 31 | 3.4 |
Tertiary | 23 | 2.5 |
Religion | ||
Catholic | 342 | 37.5 |
Anglican | 350 | 38.4 |
Muslim | 118 | 12.9 |
Pentecostal | 71 | 7.8 |
SDA | 20 | 2.2 |
Other | 11 | 1.2 |
Occupation | ||
Farming | 627 | 68.8 |
Others | 23 | 2.5 |
None | 262 | 28.7 |
Type of house | ||
permanent | 369 | 40.5 |
Semi-permanent | 320 | 35.1 |
Temporary | 223 | 24.4 |
Radio set ownership | ||
Yes | 479 | 52.5 |
No | 433 | 47.5 |
Mobile phone ownership | ||
Yes | 251 | 27.5 |
No | 661 | 72.5 |
Has electricity | ||
Yes | 90 | 9.9 |
No | 822 | 90.1 |
Land ownership | ||
Yes | 825 | 90.5 |
No | 87 | 9.5 |
Control Over household assets | ||
Self | 693 | 76.0 |
Spouse | 132 | 14.5 |
children | 87 | 9.5 |
Living arrangement | ||
Alone | 80 | 8.8 |
Spouse only | 22 | 2.4 |
Spouse & Children | 133 | 14.6 |
Children & Grandchildren | 677 | 74.2 |
Financial support | ||
Yes | 404 | 44.3 |
No | 508 | 55.7 |
Healthcare in sickness | ||
Spouse | 308 | 33.8 |
Children | 377 | 41.3 |
Grandchildren | 91 | 10.0 |
Others | 136 | 14.9 |
Distance to the nearest health center | ||
0–0.5 Km | 170 | 18.6 |
1–2 Km | 433 | 47.5 |
> 2 Km | 309 | 33.9 |
Has HIV/AIDS | ||
Yes | 28 | 3.2 |
No | 854 | 96.8 |
Do physical activities | ||
Yes | 678 | 74.4 |
No | 233 | 25.6 |
Fuel type | ||
Fire wood | 871 | 95.5 |
Charcoal | 41 | 4.5 |
Physical health | ||
Poor | 304 | 33.3 |
Fair | 304 | 33.3 |
Good | 304 | 33.3 |
Association between physical health and demographic and socio-economic factors
Table 2 presents chi-square test results for the association between physical health and selected demographic, socio-economic and social support factors. Religion, type of residential house, financial support, distance to the nearest health facility, HIV sero status and type of fuel for cooking were not significantly associated with physical health.
Table 2. Percentages of older persons by selected factors affecting their physical health.
Variable | Physical health | Number (n = 912) |
χ2 | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poor (%) | Fair (%) | Good (%) | ||||
Age | ||||||
60–69 | 22.3 | 36.4 | 41.3 | 462 | ||
70–79 | 35.9 | 31.0 | 33.1 | 290 | 85.2 | <0.001 |
80+ | 58.8 | 30.6 | 10.6 | 160 | ||
Sex | ||||||
Male | 28.1 | 32.4 | 39.5 | 395 | ||
Female | 37.3 | 34.0 | 28.6 | 517 | 13.8 | 0.001 |
Region | ||||||
Central | 35.5 | 45.2 | 19.3 | 248 | ||
East | 33.3 | 26.2 | 40.5 | 237 | 51.1 | <0.001 |
North | 29.5 | 40.0 | 30.5 | 190 | ||
West | 34.2 | 22.8 | 43.0 | 237 | ||
Education level | ||||||
No education | 37.9 | 35.9 | 26.1 | 495 | ||
Primary | 29.5 | 30.9 | 39.6 | 363 | 33.9 | <0.001 |
Secondary | 16.1 | 29.3 | 54.9 | 31 | ||
Tertiary | 17.4 | 21.7 | 60.9 | 23 | ||
Marital status | ||||||
Married | 28.2 | 30.8 | 41.0 | 461 | 28.0 | <0.001 |
Widowed | 40.2 | 35.7 | 24.1 | 361 | ||
Divorced | 32.2 | 36.7 | 31.1 | 90 | ||
Religion | ||||||
Catholic | 34.8 | 32.5 | 32.7 | 342 | ||
Anglican | 30.9 | 34.6 | 34.5 | 350 | ||
Muslim | 28.0 | 41.5 | 30.5 | 118 | ||
Pentecostal | 35.2 | 26.8 | 38.0 | 71 | 18.2 | 0.051 |
SDA | 60.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 | 20 | ||
Others | 63.6 | 9.1 | 27.3 | 11 | ||
Occupation | ||||||
Farming | 24.4 | 36.8 | 38.8 | 627 | ||
Other | 17.4 | 34.8 | 47.8 | 23 | 88.5 | <0.001 |
None | 56.1 | 24.8 | 19.1 | 262 | ||
Type of house | ||||||
Permanent | 36.8 | 31.8 | 31.4 | 223 | ||
Semi-permanent | 32.2 | 30.0 | 37.8 | 320 | 6.8 | 0.144 |
Temporary | 32.3 | 37.1 | 30.6 | 369 | ||
Radio set ownership | ||||||
Yes | 25.7 | 32.6 | 41.8 | 479 | ||
No | 41.8 | 34.2 | 24.0 | 433 | 39.4 | <0.001 |
Mobile phone ownership | ||||||
Yes | 25.1 | 28.7 | 46.2 | 251 | ||
No | 36.4 | 35.1 | 28.4 | 661 | 26.5 | <0.001 |
Has electricity | ||||||
Yes | 32.2 | 17.8 | 50.0 | 90 | ||
No | 33.5 | 35.0 | 31.5 | 822 | 15.6 | <0.001 |
Land ownership | ||||||
Yes | 31.9 | 33.3 | 34.8 | 825 | ||
No | 47.1 | 33.3 | 19.5 | 87 | 11.0 | 0.004 |
Control over household assets | ||||||
Self | 28.3 | 35.8 | 35.1 | 693 | ||
Spouse | 32.6 | 28.8 | 38.6 | 132 | ||
Children | 74.7 | 19.5 | 5.8 | 87 | 79.4 | <0.001 |
Living arrangement | ||||||
Alone | 36.3 | 37.5 | 26.2 | 80 | ||
Spouse only | 31.8 | 27.3 | 40.9 | 22 | ||
Spouse & children | 25.6 | 27.8 | 46.6 | 133 | 14.4 | 0.026 |
Children & grandchildren | 34.6 | 34.1 | 31.3 | 677 | ||
Financial support | ||||||
Yes | 35.6 | 32.4 | 31.9 | 404 | ||
No | 31.5 | 34.1 | 33.4 | 508 | 1.8 | 0.413 |
Healthcare in sickness | ||||||
Spouse | 18.8 | 33.1 | 48.1 | 308 | ||
Children | 43.5 | 31.3 | 25.2 | 377 | 64.5 | <0.001 |
Grandchildren | 32.9 | 40.7 | 26.4 | 91 | ||
Others | 38.2 | 34.6 | 27.2 | 136 | ||
Distance to the nearest health center | ||||||
0–0.5 Km | 33.5 | 31.8 | 34.7 | 170 | ||
1–2 Km | 33.9 | 31.9 | 34.2 | 426 | 1.9 | 0.760 |
> 2 Km | 32.4 | 36.3 | 31.4 | 309 | ||
Has HIV/AIDS | ||||||
Yes | 32.1 | 28.6 | 39.3 | 28 | ||
No | 33.9 | 33.4 | 32.7 | 854 | 0.6 | 0.750 |
Do physical activities | ||||||
Yes | 25.2 | 36.4 | 38.4 | 678 | ||
No | 56.6 | 24.5 | 18.9 | 233 | 78.6 | <0.001 |
Fuel type | ||||||
Fire wood | 33.3 | 33.2 | 33.5 | 871 | ||
Charcoal | 34.1 | 36.6 | 29.3 | 41 | 0.4 | 0.836 |
p = Pearson χ2 test
The results show that the prevalence of self-reported poor physical health among older persons was highest among the oldest old age 80+ (59%; p < 0.001), women (37%; p<0.001), those living in central region (36%; p<0.001), those with no formal education (40%; p<0.001), widowed (40%; p<0.001), no occupation (56%; p<0.001), those with no radio set ownership (42%; p<0.001), no mobile phone (36%; p<0.001), no electricity for lighting in their houses (34%; p<0.001), no land ownership (47%; p = 0.004). Furthermore, self-reported poor physical health was highest among older persons whose children controlled their household assets (75%; p<0.001), those who were living alone (36%; p = 0.026), those whose healthcare was derived from their children (44%; p<0.001) and not doing physical activity (57%; p<0.001).
Predictors of physical health
Results of the ordered logistic regression model of factors influencing physical health of older persons are presented in Table 3. The results show that adjusting for other variables, the odds of good versus fair and poor physical health reduced with advancement in age. Compared to ages 60–69, the likelihood of having poor physical health was higher among older persons age 70–79 years (OR = 0.688; p = 0.026) and those age 80 years and older (OR = 0.349; p<0.001). The findings also show that male older persons had increased odds (OR = 11.549; p = 0.022) of having good physical health compared to their female counterparts. Living in eastern region was associated with good physical health (OR = 1.900; p = 0.001) compared to living in the central region. The Results further indicate that older persons who possessed a radio set were nearly two times more likely to have good physical health (OR = 1.928; p<0.001) compared to those who did not. Similarly, compared to the older persons whose household assets were controlled by their children, those who controlled their household assets were more likely to have good physical health (OR = 2.292; p = 0.008). Table 3 also shows that older persons whose healthcare support was derived from their spouses were more likely to have poor physical health (0.468; p = 0.001) compared to those who obtained healthcare support from their children. Older persons that engaged in physical activity were two times (OR = 2.375; p = <0.001) more likely to have good physical health than those who were not.
Table 3. Results of ordered logistic regression of the predictors of physical health of older persons.
Variable | Odds ratio | 95% CI | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age | |||
60–69* | 1.000 | ||
70–79 | 0.688 | [0.494–0.957] | 0.026 |
80+ | 0.349 | [0.226–0.541] | <0.001 |
Sex | |||
Male | 1.549 | [1.064–2.258] | 0.022 |
Female* | 1.000 | ||
Region | |||
Central* | 1.000 | ||
East | 1.900 | [1.281–2.821] | 0.001 |
North | 1.074 | [0.645–1.789] | 0.782 |
West | 1.089 | [0.669–1.773] | 0.731 |
Education level | |||
No education* | 1.000 | ||
Primary | 0.868 | [0.626–1.203] | 0.394 |
Secondary | 1.541 | [0.603–3.937] | 0.366 |
Tertiary | 1.587 | [0.516–4.886] | 0.420 |
Marital status | |||
Married* | 1.000 | ||
Widowed | 1.479 | [0.860–2.545] | 0.157 |
Divorced | 1.711 | [0.899–2.254] | 0.101 |
Type of house | |||
Temporary* | 1.000 | ||
Semi-permanent | 1.124 | [0.759–1.663] | 0.560 |
Permanent | 0.674 | [0.432–1.052] | 0.082 |
Radio set ownership | |||
Yes | 1.928 | [1.400–2.656] | <0.001 |
No* | 1.000 | ||
Has electricity in the house | |||
Yes | 1.288 | [0.651–2.546] | 0.467 |
No* | 1.000 | ||
Land ownership | |||
Yes | 1.308 | [0.792–2.158] | 0.294 |
No* | 1.000 | ||
Control over household assets | |||
Self | 2.292 | [1.239–4.239] | 0.008 |
Spouse | 2.043 | [0.936–4.461] | 0.073 |
Children* | 1.000 | ||
Living arrangement | |||
Alone* | 1.000 | ||
Spouse only | 1.228 | [0.353–4.271] | 0.747 |
Spouse & Children | 0.862 | [0.391–1.899] | 0.712 |
Children & Grandchildren | 0.686 | [0.479–1.512] | 0.583 |
Material support | |||
Yes | 0.790 | [0.585–1.067] | 0.124 |
No* | 1.000 | ||
Healthcare in sickness | |||
Spouse* | 1.000 | ||
Children | 0. 468 | [0.293–0.745] | 0.001 |
Grandchildren | 0. 702 | [0.382–1.291] | 0.255 |
Others | 0. 686 | [0.347–1.358] | 0.279 |
Has HIV/AIDS | |||
Yes | 0.857 | [0.332–2.209] | 0.749 |
No* | 1.000 | ||
Do physical activity | |||
Yes | 2.375 | [1.583–3.562] | <0.001 |
No* | 1.000 | ||
Fuel type | |||
Firewood* | 1.000 | ||
Charcoal | 0.819 | [0.403–1.669] | 0.584 |
*Reference category
Discussion
Our findings show that poor physical health was associated with advanced age especially among older persons age 80 years and older. This finding aligns with findings of studies done in Tanzania [26], Brazil [27], England [28], South Africa [29], Sweden [30] and other countries [31–35] which reveal that as people advance in age, they become frail and begin to experience frequent falls, functional complications and lead a dependency life in activities of daily living such as bathing, toileting, eating and walking.
This study found that male older persons were more likely to have good physical health compared to their female counterparts. Whereas our finding indicates that older male persons are more likely to be physically healthy than women, literature concerning mortality rates of older persons in Uganda is generally unavailable. However, available literature from Uganda National Population and Housing Census of 2014 indicates that the life expectancy for women in Uganda is higher (64.2 years) compared to 62.2 for men [9]. This contradicts our finding which seems to suggest that physical health may not be correlated with life expectancy. However, in conformity with this finding, previous research has shown that older women experience functional disabilities than men [27, 29]. This finding could also be attributed to gender imbalances in access to and control over socio-economic and political resources where men are more advantaged than women [31, 36, 37].
Regarding region, our findings indicate that older persons living in eastern region were more likely to have good physical health compared to those in central region. Regional disparities existing in OPs’ physical health could be resulting from cultural differences and life styles especially in diet and work status as well as disparities in the availability and accessibility to health services and healthcare support. This finding is in consonance with other studies [38–41] which show that the environment or context within which OPs live affects their health.
The odds of good physical health increased among older persons who owned a radio set. It could be argued that radios perhaps facilitate in dissemination of health information to the older persons since some of the programmes are educative in health matters. In addition, they address loneliness through entertainment. This finding aligns with previous studies which found that radio was one of the reliable sources of information in health related issues of older persons [42].
OPs whose assets were controlled by themselves or their spouses were more likely to have good physical health compared to their counterparts whose assets were controlled by their children. This could partly be because having control over assets leads to quicker decision making on matters relating to better health for the older person. This result is in agreement with previous studies [31, 43–46] which show that older persons who possess assets are more likely to generate incomes that facilitate access to healthcare and other social services that enhance their physical health [31, 43–46]. Similarly, older persons whose health care was supported by their children had poor physical health. Co-residence is currently rare making it difficult for children to provide quality care to their parents [47, 48]. Previous studies [8, 13, 18, 48–50] show that low healthcare support to the older persons by children results from family disruptions such as increasing rate of nuclear families education and rural-urban migration where children choose to live far away from their ageing parents with limited support.
The findings indicate that older persons who engaged in physical activity were more likely to have good physical health. In agreement with the previous studies [51–55], physical activity strengthens health status of older persons through decreased falls and morbidity. The major limitation of this study is that analysis relied on self-reported responses and not from anthropometric measures. Inadequate funding could not enable us to do objective analysis. Thus, the responses could have been under reported, over reported or misreported. Another limitation is that this study did not use complex survey analysis that would adjust for cluster sampling.
Conclusions
The odds of poor physical health were higher among; OPs of advanced age, females, those who lived in central region of the country, those who did not own a radio, those whose children controlled household assets and supported healthcare. Similarly, the OPs who did not engage in physical activity were more likely to have poor physical health. These findings have various policy implications, including creating an enabling environment and building capacities of older persons to remain in control of their household assets. Interventions focusing on deepening sensitization of older persons about importance of physical exercises could be a viable strategy for improving physical health of older persons.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA (http://cartafrica.org/) is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand and funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No--B 8606.R02), Sida (Grant No:54100029), the DELTAS Africa Initiative (Grant No:107768/Z/15/Z). The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS)’s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust (UK) (Grant No: 107768/Z/15/Z) and the UK government. The authors also thank the College of Business and Management Sciences, Makerere University (http://bams.mak.ac.ug/) for financial support. We also appreciate the Centre for Population and Applied Statistics (CPAS), Makerere University for providing space while writing this paper. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of this manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand and funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No--B 8606.R02), Sida (Grant No:54100029), the DELTAS Africa Initiative (Grant No:107768/Z/15/Z). The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS)’s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust (UK) (Grant No: 107768/Z/15/Z) and the UK government. The authors also thank the College of Business and Management Sciences, Makerere University (http://bams.mak.ac.ug/) for financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.UN. World Population Ageing 2017, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division—Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/397). 2017.
- 2.UNDESA. Concise Report on the World Population Situation: Department of Economic and Social Affairs,Population Division. 2014.
- 3.UNECA. The State of Older People in Africa -2007 Regional review and appraisal of the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing: United Nations Economic Commision for Africa 2007.
- 4.Bigombe B, Khadiagala GM. Major trends affecting families in Sub-Saharan Africa. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ed Major trends affecting families: a background document New York: United Nations. 2003:164Á87.
- 5.Aboderin IAG, Beard JR. Older people’s health in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet. 2015;385(9968):e9–e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.UN. Population Ageing and Development: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations.. 2013.
- 7.UNFPA & HAI. Ageing in the Twenty-First Century: A celebration and a challenge. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York, and HelpAge International, London. 2012.
- 8.MoGLSD. National policy for older persons (Ageing with Security and Dignity),Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development. 2009.
- 9.UBOS. The National Population and Housing Census 2014 –Main Report, Kampala, Uganda: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. 2016.
- 10.PRB. 2017 World population data sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2017.
- 11.UBOS. Uganda National Household Survey 2012/2013. Socio-economic module. Abridged report. Kampala, Uganda: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. 2014.
- 12.MoGLSD. National Action Plan for Older persons, 2012/2017, Kampala: Ministry of Gender Labour and social Development. 2013.
- 13.Golaz V, Wandera SO, Rutaremwa G. Understanding the vulnerability of older adults: extent of and breaches in support systems in Uganda. Ageing and Society. 2015:1–27. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S. Development of the WHOQOL-Old Module. Quality of Life Research. 2005;14(10):2197–214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harper A. Development of the World Health Organisation WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological medicine. 1998;28(3):551–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nzabona A, Ntozi J, Rutaremwa G. Loneliness among older persons in Uganda: examining social, economic and demographic risk factors. Ageing & Society. 2015; 1–29. 10.1017/S0144686X15000112 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Golaz V, Rutaremwa G. The vulnerability of older adults: what do census data say? An application to Uganda. African Population Studies 2011;25, 2. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Najjumba-Mulindwa I, editor Chronic poverty among the elderly in Uganda: perceptions, experiences and policy issues. Conference "Staying poor: Chronic poverty and Development Policy", University of Manchester.2003.
- 19.Kikafunda JK, Lukwago FB. Nutritional status and functional ability of the elderly aged 60 to 90 years in the Mpigi district of central Uganda. Nutrition. 2005;21(1):59–66. 10.1016/j.nut.2004.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys AAPOR, 2016.
- 21.WHO. WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: field trial version, December 1996. 1996.
- 22.Brown James D. Choosing the right type of rotation in PCA and EFA. JALT testing & evaluation SIG newsletter. 2009;13(3):20–5. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Finch WH. A comparison of factor rotation methods for dichotomous data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2011;10(2):14. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Azevedo JP. FACTORTEST: Stata module to perform tests for appropriateness of factor analysis. 2006.
- 25.Kabunga NS, Dubois T, Qaim M. Impact of tissue culture banana technology on farm household income and food security in Kenya. Food Policy. 2014;45:25–34. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mwanyangala MA, Mayombana C, Urassa H, Charles J, Mahutanga C, Abdullah S, et al. Health status and quality of life among older adults in rural Tanzania. Global health action. 2010;3: 10.3402/gha.v3i0.2142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fillenbaum GG, Blay SL, Andreoli SB, Gastal FL. Prevalence and Correlates of Functional Status in an Older Community-Representative Sample in Brazil. Journal of aging and health. 2010;22(3):362–83. 10.1177/0898264309359307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Roe B, Beech R, Harris M, Beech B, Russell W, Gent D, et al. Improving quality of life for older people in the community: findings from a local Partnerships for Older People Project innovation and evaluation. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2011;12(3):200–13. Epub 03/11. 10.1017/S1463423611000053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gómez-Olivé FX, Thorogood M, Bocquier P, Mee P, Kahn K, Berkman L, et al. Social conditions and disability related to the mortality of older people in rural South Africa. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2014;43(5):1531–41. 10.1093/ije/dyu093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stenhagen M, Ekström H, Nordell E, Elmståhl S. Both deterioration and improvement in activities of daily living are related to falls: a 6-year follow-up of the general elderly population study Good Aging in Skåne. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2014;9:1839–46. 10.2147/CIA.S70075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Unalan D, Gocer S, Basturk M, Baydur H, Ozturk A. Coincidence of low social support and high depressive score on quality of life in elderly. European Geriatric Medicine. 2015;(0). 10.1016/j.eurger.2015.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Crasto CL, Semba RD, Sun K, Cappola AR, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L. Relationship of Low-Circulating “Anti-Aging” Klotho Hormone with Disability in Activities of Daily Living among Older Community-Dwelling Adults. Rejuvenation Research. 2012;15(3):295–301. 10.1089/rej.2011.1268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rajan KB, Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Mendes de Leon CF, Evans DA. Disability in Basic and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living is Associated with Faster Rate of Decline in Cognitive Function of Older Adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2013;68(5):624–30. 10.1093/gerona/gls208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Han L, Allore H, Murphy T, Gill T, Peduzzi P, Lin H. Dynamics of functional aging based on latent-class trajectories of activities of daily living. Annals of Epidemiology. 2013;23(2):87–92. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thompson WW, Zack MM, Krahn GL, Andresen EM, Barile JP. Health-Related Quality of Life Among Older Adults With and Without Functional Limitations. American Journal of Public Health. 2012;102(3):496–502. 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Van Minh H, Byass P, Chuc NT, Wall S. Patterns of health status and quality of life among older people in rural Viet Nam. Global health action. 2010;3 Epub 2010/10/21. 10.3402/gha.v3i0.2124 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Phillips SP, Hamberg K. Women’s relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real? 2015;8 Epub 2015-01-05. 10.3402/gha.v8.27259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zahava G, Bowling A. Quality of life from the perspectives of older people: Aging and society, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. Ageing & Society 2004;24:675–91. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Paskulin LMG, Molzahn A. Quality of Life of Older Adults in Canada and Brazil. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2007;29(1):10–26. 10.1177/0193945906292550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schatz E, Gómez-Olivé X, Ralston M, Menken J, Tollman S. The impact of pensions on health and wellbeing in rural South Africa: Does gender matter? Social science & medicine (1982). 2012;75(10):1864–73. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wandera SO, Kwagala B, Ntozi J. Determinants of access to healthcare by older persons in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2015;14:26 10.1186/s12939-015-0157-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chaudhuri S, Le T, White C, Thompson H, Demiris G. Examining Health Information–Seeking Behaviors of Older Adults. Computers, informatics, nursing: CIN. 2013;31(11):547–53. 10.1097/01.NCN.0000432131.92020.42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bilgili N, Arpacı F. Quality of life of older adults in Turkey. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2014;59(2):415–21. 10.1016/j.archger.2014.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim BJ, Harris LM. Social Capital and Self-Rated Health Among Older Korean Immigrants. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2013;32(8):997–1014. 10.1177/0733464812448528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Feng Z, Jones K, Wang WW. An exploratory discrete-time multilevel analysis of the effect of social support on the survival of elderly people in China. Social Science & Medicine. 2015;130(0):181–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dai H, Jia G, Liu K. Health-related quality of life and related factors among elderly people in Jinzhou, China: a cross-sectional study. Public Health. 2014;(0). 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.HAI. AU policy framework and plan of action on aging, Help Age Internal Africa Regional Development Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. 2003.
- 48.Liang J, Zhang P, Zhu X, Qiao Y, Zhao L, He Q, et al. Effect of intergenerational and intragenerational support on perceived health of older adults: a population-based analysis in rural China. Family Practice. 2014;31(2):164–71. 10.1093/fampra/cmt073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Moges AG, Tamiya N, Yamamoto H. Emerging Population Ageing Challenges in Africa: A Case of Ethiopia. Kokusai Hoken Iryo (Journal of International Health). 2014;29(1):11–5. 10.11197/jaih.29.11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Melchiorre MG, Chiatti C, Lamura G, Torres-Gonzales F, Stankunas M, Lindert J, et al. Social Support, Socio-Economic Status, Health and Abuse among Older People in Seven European Countries. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54856 10.1371/journal.pone.0054856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kwag KH, Martin P, Russell D, Franke W, Kohut M. The Impact of Perceived Stress, Social Support, and Home-Based Physical Activity on Mental Health among Older Adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 2011;72(2):137–54. 10.2190/AG.72.2.c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen Y, While AE, Hicks A. Physical activity among older people living alone in Shanghai, China. Health Education Journal. 2014. 10.1177/0017896914523943 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yuan S-C, Weng S-C, Chou M-C, Tang Y-J, Lee S-H, Chen D-Y, et al. How family support affects physical activity (PA) among middle-aged and elderly people before and after they suffer from chronic diseases. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2011;53(3):274–7. 10.1016/j.archger.2010.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hamer M, Lavoie KL, Bacon SL. Taking up physical activity in later life and healthy ageing: the English longitudinal study of ageing. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014;48(3):239 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hui EK, Rubenstein LZ. Promoting physical activity and exercise in older adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006;7(5):310–4. Epub 2006/06/13. 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.03.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.