Abstract
Aspergillus niger and other filamentous fungi are widely used in industry, but efficient genetic engineering of these hosts remains nascent. For example, while molecular genetic tools have been developed, including CRISPR/Cas9, facile genome engineering of A. niger remains challenging. To address these challenges, we have developed a simple Cas9-based gene targeting method that provides selectable, iterative, and ultimately marker-free generation of genomic deletions and insertions. This method leverages locus-specific “pop-out” recombination to suppress off-target integrations. We demonstrated the effectiveness of this method by targeting the phenotypic marker albA and validated it by targeting the glaA and mstC loci. After two selection steps, we observed 100% gene editing efficiency across all three loci. This method greatly reduces the effort required to engineer the A. niger genome and overcomes low Cas9 transformations efficiency by eliminating the need for extensive screening. This method represents a significant addition to the A. niger genome engineering toolbox and could be adapted for use in other organisms. It is expected that this method will impact several areas of industrial biotechnology, such as the development of new strains for the secretion of heterologous enzymes and the discovery and optimization of metabolic pathways.
Introduction
The recombinant production of enzymes at high titers using various hosts, such as filamentous fungi, is an important aspect affecting costs for many commercial applications today, including pharmaceuticals [1], food processing [2], biofuels [3], and detergents. Despite the widespread deployment of these fungal strains in industry, the genetic toolbox by which they can be efficiently optimized for any given application, such as improved recombinant protein production from gene expression, remains challenging and time consuming [4]. One of the industrial approaches to the conversion of starches and polysaccharides into monomers suitable for subsequent bioconversion into biofuels relies on the use of hydrolytic enzymes, such as amylases, cellulases, and hemicellulases that are naturally found in fungi and bacteria [5,6]. In order for recombinant enzymes of this type to be produced at the commercial scale, they must be produced at high titers and yields in order to reduce costs. While these enzymes could be produced by the filamentous fungi in which they are found in naturally or in recombinant hosts, these fungi may not secrete enough of the targeted enzymes needed and therefore genetic engineering and optimization of these strains is an important component of commercial viability [7].
Aspergillus niger is a filamentous ascomycete fungus utilized industrially for the production of citric acid and for its ability to produce and secrete high levels of endogenous and recombinant enzymes [8]. It is generally recognized as safe at the commercial scale, its genome is sequenced and it is amenable to standard genetic modification techniques [9]. The genomic integration of exogenous DNA via homologous recombination (HR) has been widely applied in A. niger and other filamentous fungi [8]. Typically, genes are replaced with a “fixing template” containing a selectable marker, thereby permitting selection of the integration event. The pyrG gene, encoding encodes orotidine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase, an intermediate in the pyrimidine pathway forming uridine monophosphate, is both positively and negatively selectable; the integration of pyrG can be selected for by culturing in the absence of uracil/uridine while the absence of pyrG can be selected for in the presence of 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) [10,11]. pyrG converts 5-FOA into fluoroorotidine monophosphate which is subsequently converted into fluorodeoxyuridine by ribonuclease reductase. Fluorodeoxyuridine is a suicide inhibitor of the thymidylate synthase and therefore inhibits DNA synthesis and leads to cell death. 5-FOA is non-toxic in the absence of pyrG. The positive/negative selection of pyrG can be exploited to permit iterative targeting by selecting for the “pop-out” excision of pyrG via HR after integration [12].
Targeting double stranded breaks (DSBs) to the site of DNA integration is known to increase the efficiency of HR [13–16]. Originally a bacterial defense system, the now-ubiquitous CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats; CRISPR associated protein 9) was engineered for rapid targeting of DSBs [17]. In this system, a small guide RNA (sgRNA) targets the Cas9 endonuclease to its complementary DNA. In addition to facilitating HR, CRISPR/Cas9 can be used to introduce deletions and point mutations without necessarily introducing foreign DNA [18,19]. CRISPR/Cas9 was previously demonstrated to be effective in several filamentous fungi, e.g. A. niger, A. oryzae, A. fumigatus, and Neurospora crassa [20–22].
Nevertheless, this method requires extensive screening as off-target integrations, mediated by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), lead to an overwhelming rate of false positives [21]. Several strategies have been employed to increase the efficiency of HR, including the adjustment of length of the HR arms [23], engineering the RAD52 HR protein [24], or knocking out the Ku70 genes responsible for NHEJ [25]. Complete disruption of NHEJ can lead to genomic instability and increases the risk of DNA damage [26]. Therefore, high-efficiency specific gene editing in A. niger and other filamentous fungi remains a significant challenge. Editing efficiency has been reported to be from anywhere between 1 and 100% efficient depending on the CRISPR/Cas9 setup and the target locus [21]. Targeting non-phenotypic genes requires laborious sequencing of transformants.
To address these challenges, we have developed reusable, transiently-selectable donor DNA for a specific integration system. After validating this methodology using the phenotypic marker albA, we sequentially targeted two genes likely to improve heterologous enzyme production. We replaced glaA (glucoamylase) with the Thermotoga petrophila β-glucosidase designated A5IL97 [27]. We then interrupted the sugar transporter mstC [28] and observed 100% efficiency of the desired mutations at all three loci using positive and negative selection pressure. This approach allows for the efficient engineering of A. niger and eliminates the need for screening hundreds of transformants. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published report on this new Cas9 approach and applying it in A. niger (or any fungi) and significantly reduces the time required for the screening of positive mutants at high efficiencies.
Results
Our approach relies on the induction of a genomic DSB with a targetable Cas9/sgRNA complex, incorporation of a selectable marker via HR, and selection of pyrG-containing mutants by culturing in the absence of uracil/uridine. To validate this approach, we targeted albA, a polyketide synthase responsible for the production of a black spore pigment [29]. When albA is disrupted, colonies present a white rather than black spore phenotype, providing a convenient and commonly used selection technique.
We generated a fixing template cDNA006, with 1,500 bp homology arms for targeting albA (Fig 1). cDNA006 contains a 5’ stop codon repeat for disrupting translation and the pyrG gene. To generate a “recyclable” marker system, pyrG was flanked with direct repeat sequences [12]. Upon exposure to 5-FOA, transformants containing pyrG should undergo “pop-out” recombination to remove the marker, thereby permitting additional rounds of gene targeting using pyrG selection.
While some methods contain the fixing template and sgRNA on the same plasmid as Cas9, this necessitates additional cloning steps when targeting new genes and leads to off target effects due to constitutive expression [21]. We therefore opted for in vitro preparation of the sgRNA and fixing template (see Methods). cDNA006, an albA-targeting small guide RNA (sgRNA001) and plasmid pFC332, containing a constitutively expressed A. niger codon-optimized Cas9, were simultaneously transformed into ATCC 1015 pyrG -. Transformants were plated onto minimal media without uracil/uridine and with 300 μg/mL hygromycin to select for the integration of pyrG and the maintenance of pFC332, respectively. After 4 days, 79% of the colonies had the white spore phenotype, indicating successful targeting of albA (Fig 1). We then isolated black and white colonies and re-streaked them on minimal media containing uracil/uridine and 5-FOA, to select for the “pop-out” recombination of pyrG (Fig 1A, step 2). These colonies were then re-plated on MMA + uracil. Sequencing the specific locus revealed that the 100% of the black colonies were free of mutations at the albA locus, while 100% of the white colonies contained the integrated stop codon exact protospacer location of the sgRNA (Fig 1) (S1 Fig).
We observed efficient, selectable gene deletion with successful excision of pyrG. Nevertheless, 21% of colonies did not have mutations at the albA locus but survived on MMA + hygromycin without uracil/uridine supplied (Fig 1B and 1C), indicating NHEJ-mediated off-target integration of the fixing template [30]. While NHEJ-mediated repair can be suppressed by knocking out genes in the NHEJ pathway, this can lead to genomic instability and mutagenic sensitivity [26]. Therefore, we sought to engineer a fixing template to screen positive mutations at the correct integration locus.
Developing a specific pop-out marker
We designed a fixing template (cDNA008) that will excise pyrG when it is specifically integrated at the albA locus (Fig 2A). Rather than inserting a stop codon, cDNA008 was designed to delete 1000 bp of albA to disrupt the gene. Like cDNA006, cDNA008 contains the pyrG gene. A 300 bp cassette was placed in front of the pyrG gene that are homologous to the 3’ region of albA. After integration and exposure to 5-FOA, pyrG should undergo pop out recombination if it is correctly integrated into the albA locus. HR loses efficiency as the distance between homologous sequences increases [31]. Therefore, HR-mediated excision of pyrG will be inefficient for off-target integrations, and cells with off-target integrations should die in the presence of 5-FOA.
After transformation of Cas9, sgRNA001, and cDNA008, 71% of the colonies had the white spore phenotype (Fig 2B). 7 white and 3 black colonies were re-streaked on plates containing 5-FOA. The white colonies survived on plates containing 5-FOA, while there was no detectable growth of the black colonies after one week (Fig 2C) (S2 Fig). PCR amplification of the albA locus at each stage showed (#2) the integration of pyrG, and (#3) the pop-out recombination of pyrG and deletion of 1000bp of albA (Fig 2D). Sequencing the albA locus of all mutants confirmed the integration of pyrG and subsequent recombination upon 5-FOA treatment. Therefore, on the 10 analyzed colonies, we observed 100% of correct albA locus modifications after treatment with 5-FOA, suggesting the method suppresses off-target integrations (S2 and S3 Figs).
Targeting a non-phenotypic gene
After demonstrating the feasibility of our method at the albA locus, we then targeted the non-phenotypic gene glaA, and replaced it with another gene, A5IL97, in a single procedure. The glaA gene encodes the glucoamylase enzyme, a natural highly secreted enzyme of A. niger [32], which has a strong promoter, PglaA [33], that can be used to produce heterologous enzymes [28]. As a proof of concept, we used the gene that encodes for the β-glucosidase A5IL97 that has been previously shown to be secreted by A. niger [28]. We designed a construct, cDNA009, to target the glaA locus. cDNA009 resembles the cDNA008 with the addition of the open reading frame (ORF) for A5IL97 (Fig 3A). After transformation, 10 colonies were isolated on MMA selecting for the integration of pyrG. After PCR amplification at the glaA locus, only 8 colonies of the 10 selected on MMA had integration of the pyrG marker at the locus. After 5-FOA selection, only the 8 colonies containing previously pyrG survived on 5-FOA. Sequencing of 5-FOA resistant mutants confirmed 100% efficient deletion of glaA, integration of A5IL97 and the pyrG marker was removed at the locus (Table 1) (S4 Fig).
Table 1. Efficiency obtained before and after selection of 5-FOA by PCR amplification at the mutated locus and sequence verified.
Gene targeting | Constructs | sgRNA | Method | Before 5-FOA | After 5-FOA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
albA− Codon stop insertion |
cDNA006 X-pyrG-X |
sgRNA001 | Non-selective | 19 white colonies 5 black colonies (79% white colonies) |
8 white colonies 2 black colonies |
albA− Deletion of 1000 bp |
cDNA008 X-pyrG |
sgRNA001 | Selective | 20 white colonies 8 black colonies (71% white colonies) |
7 white colonies 0 black colonies |
ΔglaA Gene replacement with A5IL97 |
cDNA009 A5IL97-X-pyrG |
sgRNA002 sgRNA003 |
Selective | 8 colonies with pyrG at the locus 2 colonies without pyrG at the locus |
8 on target 0 off target |
ΔmstC Gene deletion |
cDNA010 X-pyrG |
sgRNA004 sgRNA005 |
Selective | 7 colonies with pyrG at the locus 3 colonies without pyrG at the locus |
7 on target 0 off target |
As 5-FOA exposure led to the excision of pyrG and the genotype A. niger ΔglaA/PglaA-A5IL97 pyrG−, this method is inherently recyclable. After successfully replacing glaA with A5IL97, we verified the iterative nature of this method by targeted disruption of a second gene, mstC, in this strain (Fig 3B). mstC encodes a glucose transporter that, once disrupted, has been identified to enhance the PglaA for heterologous enzyme production [28]. With an off-target suppressing construct, we targeted mstC and observed 100% deletion after 5-FOA (Table 1), making the strain A. niger pyrG− ΔglaA/PglaA-A5IL97 ΔmstC (S5 Fig).
Discussion
We have designed and demonstrated a technique that efficiently edits the genome of A. niger based on CRISPR/Cas9. We targeted the non-phenotypic genes glaA and mstC on the same strain and obtained 100% efficiency after selection on 5-FOA. Despite the 100% efficiency observed at these three different loci using the method, there is no guarantee that 100% efficiency will be observed for all loci. Many factors influence the probability of genomic modification, including the essentiality and accessibility of a gene [34]. The originality of this technique is in the design of the construct which leads to a simple counter selectable method for in-target integration, allowing us to tolerate loss of efficiency due to the organism, the gene target [35], the choice of the sgRNA or the way in which it is delivered (in vitro or in vivo, choice of the promoter), and the Cas9 expression method. It should be noted that other off-target effects, such as the generation of point mutants caused by Cas9, are not suppressed. The method presented here should overcome limitations in genome editing in filamentous fungi such as low efficiency editing for some loci and the time required to screen mutants when the gene in target is not phenotypic. The described method is a worthwhile addition to the tools available for genome editing in filamentous fungi such as the use of short recombination arms [36], and reduction of off-target effects by knockout of the NHEJ protein KusA [37].
We used the Cas9 plasmid under a constitutive promoter but not with the sgRNA on the plasmid to reduce the risk of off-target effects [19,38] and facilitate the preparation of the sgRNA for the transformation. For our purposes in vitro sgRNA preparation was sufficient for 100% gene editing, which is in line with other reports demonstrating the efficiency of in vitro sgRNA [30,39]. The choice of the sgRNA is crucial for the Cas9 targeting efficiency. A simple test in vitro with Cas9 can demonstrate the efficiency of each individual sgRNA (see Methods). Looking forward, in vitro sgRNA preparation may be the easiest method for testing many sgRNAs without the need for extensive sub cloning [30].
The primary focus of this study was to reduce the workload of screening for positive mutants and to generate a recyclable rescue marker for iterative mutation, which we have demonstrated. This method can be adopted to generate point mutants by incorporating the mutation in the fixing template. In this study we only used the auxotrophic marker pyrG vs 5-FOA, but there are more rescue markers available that have not been tested, such as amdS. This method may be applied to multiplex genome engineering in the same recyclable, specific manner. Many of the pre-existing CRISPR/Cas9 methods work in multiple filamentous fungi [21]. While we have only tested these methods on A. niger, these methods may likely be applied to other species. In conclusion, this novel method greatly simplifies genome editing in A. niger and will enable the rapid generation of genomic mutants and libraries for the investigation of biology and further improve the use of A. niger as an important heterologous production host.
Materials and methods
Reagents
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma unless otherwise noted.
Strains
The strains used in this paper are listed in Table 2. The genome sequence of strain ATCC 1015 v4.0 is accessible from the Joint Genome Institute (JGI).
Table 2. A. niger strains used in this study and their accession information.
Name | Genotype | Source | Access |
---|---|---|---|
JBEI-14377 | ATCC 1015 pyrG - | [29] |
https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
JBEI-099147 | ATCC 1015 pyrG−albA – | This study. | https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
JBEI-099148 | ATCC 1015 pyrG−albA – | This study. | https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
JBEI-099149 | ATCC 1015 pyrG− ΔglaA/PglaA-A5IL97 | This study. | https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
JBEI-099151 | ATCC 1015 pyrG− ΔmstC ΔglaA/ PglaA-A5IL97 | This study. | https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
Plasmids
This study builds off of pre-existing Cas9 expression of the pFC332 shuttle plasmids for A. niger [22]. The plasmids express an A. niger codon optimized Cas9 under expression of the TEF-1 promoter. These contain the A. nidulans AMA1 replication cassette which mediates replication in multiple species of filamentous fungi [40]. The plasmid contains an hygromycin (hph) resistance marker for the selection of the plasmid. All plasmids were re-sequenced before proceeding further. Each transformation has been executed with a positive control, using two plasmids pFC330 (pyrG marker) and pFC332 (hph marker), and a negative control, using water.
Construction of sgRNA
All of the sgRNA used, except for the albA sgRNA [22], were designed using the CRISPOR algorithm [41] and chosen to minimize off-target mismatches (Table 3). Once the sgRNA were chosen using the CRISPOR algorithm, they were prepared and tested in vitro using the Guide-it sgRNA Screening Kit (Takara). After the sgRNA were validated in vitro, they were amplified for transformation using the GeneART gRNA synthesis (Thermo Fisher). The concentration of sgRNA obtained after purification was ~10 μg/μL (Nanodrop). 20 μg sgRNA were used for each transformation to reach an optimal efficiency.
Table 3. Sequence of sgRNAs with original source.
Gene targeting | Sequencing | name | Source |
---|---|---|---|
albA | AGTGGGATCTCAAGAACTAC | sgRNA001 | [22] |
glaA 5' | CTGTGCAGACGAGGCCGCTC | sgRNA002 | CRISPOR.tefor.net |
glaA 3' | TCTACACGAAGGAAAGACCA | sgRNA003 | CRISPOR.tefor.net |
mstC 5' | TCCGCGTTGTATGAATCCAC | sgRNA004 | CRISPOR.tefor.net |
mstC 3' | GTGCCAGGCAGCCTGACCGG | sgRNA005 | CRISPOR.tefor.net |
Donor DNA
DNA design
Each donor DNA (cDNA) contained the pyrG gene and was flanked with 1000 bp or 1500 bp HR arms for efficient integration [25].
DNA preparation
The preparation of the donor cDNA was performed via PCR cloning or purchased from Genscript (https://www.genscript.com/) (Table 4). The cDNA was integrated into the plasmid pUC57, transformed into DH10b competent cells (New England Biolabs, NEB) and selected on LB with 100 μg/mL carbenicillin plates. The resulting plasmids (Table 4) were sequence verified by Quintara (https://www.quintarabio.com/). The plasmids were used as the template to generate linear cDNAs by PCR amplification using Phusion Hot Start II (Thermo Fisher) and their respective primers (S1 Table). The four cDNAs PCR products were purified and concentrated to 1 μg/μL and 10 μg was used per transformation as described below.
Table 4. cDNA features and their accession information.
Strains | Plasmid | Amplicon | Gene target | Homology arms (bp) | Selectable marker | Sequence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBEI-099138 | pllk034 | cDNA006 | albA | 1500 | pyrG | https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
JBEI-099142 | pllk036 | cDNA008 | albA | 1000 | pyrG | https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
JBEI-099144 | pllk038 | cDNA009 | glaA | 1000 | pyrG | https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
JBEI-099146 | pllk039 | cDNA010 | mstC | 1000 | pyrG | https://registry.jbei.org/folders/1399 |
Transformation
Before transformation, A. niger was prepared for a protoplast-mediated transformation (PMT) [42], which consist of degrading the cell wall using VinoTaste Pro. After simultaneous transformation of Cas9, sgRNA, and the donor DNA into A. niger pyrG−, the mixture was incubated on ice for 20 minutes in a transformation solution (25% polyethylene glycol (6,000), 50 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0). The mixture was plated on a 1% glucose minimal media containing agar and 1M sorbitol (MMA) + 300 μg/mL hygromycin, and the plates were incubated at 30°C. After transformation, the colonies were isolated on plates containing MMA + 300 μg/mL hygromycin. After visible growth but before the appearance of the first spores, the colonies were scooped out and isolated on slants containing only MMA. The Cas9 plasmid is lost in the absence of selective pressure (hygromycin). Once the colonies in the slants formed spores, the spores were isolated on plates containing MMA + 1.3 mg/mL 5-FOA + 1.2 mg/mL uracil. If the colonies were growing, they were re-isolated using MMA + 1.3 mg/mL 5-FOA + 1.2 mg/mL uracil plates again, then before the appearance of the first spores the colonies were scooped out and placed on slants containing MMA + 1.2 mg/mL uracil/uridine. For each transformation a minimum of 10 colonies were isolated, transformed on 5-FOA then re-isolated for analysis by PCR and sequencing (S6 Fig). To determine the efficacy of 5-FOA, the colonies were lysed and analyzed before and after exposure to 5-FOA. Note that if the pyrG marker needs to be recycled, it is recommended that the fungi recover between experiments. Also, manipulation of spores often leads to contamination and requires great care during the transformation [43]. The detail protocol “Transformation Aspergillus niger using Cas9, AMA1 vector, pyrG rescue marker and sgRNA in vitro” is available on protocols.io.
Lysis
20 μL spores were harvested in 0.1% of tween buffer and mixed in 500 μL a solution containing 400 mM of Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 60 mM of ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 1% (v/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). After incubation at room temperature for 10 minutes, 100 μL of a second solution containing 2 M potassium acetate, and 7.6% glacial acetic at pH 4.8 was added to the mixture. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm, the supernatant containing the DNA was cleaned using isopropyl alcohol followed by 70% ethanol (EtOH). The ethanol was evaporated in a rotavapor (Vacufuge Plus Eppendorf) and the DNA was resuspended into 50 μL dH2O. The detail protocol “Lysis Aspergillus niger, extracting and purifying DNA” is available on protocols.io.
PCR
Every transformation was analyzed by PCR (AB Applied Biosystems/Veriti 96 well Thermal Cycler) before 5-FOA and after 5-FOA (S1–S3, S4 and S5 Figs). We used LongAmp Taq DNA polymerase purchased from NEB and the primers synthesized by Integrated DNA Technology (IDT) (S2 and S3 Tables). The protocol followed was provided by NEB.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Jay Gandhi and Isabel Honda for their valuable experimental help.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute (http://www.jbei.org) and by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, through contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 between Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. This research was also conducted as part of the Co-Optimization of Fuels & Engines (Co-Optima) project sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bioenergy Technologies and Vehicle Technologies Offices. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Schmidt FR. Recombinant expression systems in the pharmaceutical industry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004. September;65(4):363–72. 10.1007/s00253-004-1656-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Olempska-Beer ZS, Merker RI, Ditto MD, DiNovi MJ. Food-processing enzymes from recombinant microorganisms—a review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006. July;45(2):144–58. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Adrio JL, Demain AL. Microbial enzymes: tools for biotechnological processes. Biomolecules. 2014. January 16;4(1):117–39. 10.3390/biom4010117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ward OP. Production of recombinant proteins by filamentous fungi. Biotechnol Adv. 2012. October;30(5):1119–39. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gladden JM, Park JI, Bergmann J, Reyes-Ortiz V, D’haeseleer P, Quirino BF, et al. Discovery and characterization of ionic liquid-tolerant thermophilic cellulases from a switchgrass-adapted microbial community. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014. January 29;7(1):15 10.1186/1754-6834-7-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martínez AT, Speranza M, Ruiz-Dueñas FJ, Ferreira P, Camarero S, Guillén F, et al. Biodegradation of lignocellulosics: microbial, chemical, and enzymatic aspects of the fungal attack of lignin. Int Microbiol. 2005. September;8(3):195–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Punt PJ, van Biezen N, Conesa A, Albers A, Mangnus J, van den Hondel C. Filamentous fungi as cell factories for heterologous protein production. Trends Biotechnol. 2002. May;20(5):200–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meyer V. Genetic engineering of filamentous fungi—progress, obstacles and future trends. Biotechnol Adv. 2008. April;26(2):177–85. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Patyshakuliyeva A, Arentshorst M, Allijn IE, Ram AFJ, de Vries RP, Gelber IB. Improving cellulase production by Aspergillus niger using adaptive evolution. Biotechnol Lett. 2016. June;38(6):969–74. 10.1007/s10529-016-2060-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ling SOS, Storms R, Zheng Y, Rodzi MRM, Mahadi NM, Illias RM, et al. Development of a pyrG mutant of Aspergillus oryzae strain S1 as a host for the production of heterologous proteins. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013. November 30;2013:634317 10.1155/2013/634317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boeke JD, La Croute F, Fink GR. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984. November 1;197(2):345–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.d’Enfert C. Selection of multiple disruption events in Aspergillus fumigatus using the orotidine-5’-decarboxylase gene, pyrG, as a unique transformation marker. Curr Genet. 1996. June;30(1):76–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Elliott B, Richardson C, Winderbaum J, Nickoloff JA, Jasin M. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998. January;18(1):93–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rouet P, Smih F, Jasin M. Expression of a site-specific endonuclease stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994. June 21;91(13):6064–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bibikova M, Carroll D, Segal DJ, Trautman JK, Smith J, Kim YG, et al. Stimulation of homologous recombination through targeted cleavage by chimeric nucleases. Mol Cell Biol. 2001. January;21(1):289–97. 10.1128/MCB.21.1.289-297.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014. November 28;346(6213):1258096 10.1126/science.1258096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012. August 17;337(6096):816–21. 10.1126/science.1225829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mali P, Esvelt KM, Church GM. Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology. Nat Methods. 2013. October;10(10):957–63. 10.1038/nmeth.2649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013. April;41(7):4336–43. 10.1093/nar/gkt135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Deng H, Gao R, Liao X, Cai Y. CRISPR system in filamentous fungi: Current achievements and future directions. Gene. 2017. September 5;627:212–21. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shi T-Q, Liu G-N, Ji R-Y, Shi K, Song P, Ren L-J, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing of the filamentous fungi: the state of the art. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017. October;101(20):7435–43. 10.1007/s00253-017-8497-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nødvig CS, Nielsen JB, Kogle ME, Mortensen UH. A CRISPR-Cas9 System for Genetic Engineering of Filamentous Fungi. PLoS ONE. 2015. July 15;10(7):e0133085 10.1371/journal.pone.0133085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chaveroche MK, Ghigo JM, d’Enfert C. A rapid method for efficient gene replacement in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000. November 15;28(22):E97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Krappmann S. Gene targeting in filamentous fungi: the benefits of impaired repair. Fungal Biol Rev. 2007. February;21(1):25–9. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meyer V, Arentshorst M, El-Ghezal A, Drews A-C, Kooistra R, van den Hondel CAMJJ, et al. Highly efficient gene targeting in the Aspergillus niger kusA mutant. J Biotechnol. 2007. March 10;128(4):770–5. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.12.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang J, Mao Z, Xue W, Li Y, Tang G, Wang A, et al. Ku80 gene is related to non-homologous end-joining and genome stability in Aspergillus niger. Curr Microbiol. 2011. April;62(4):1342–6. 10.1007/s00284-010-9853-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haq IU, Khan MA, Muneer B, Hussain Z, Afzal S, Majeed S, et al. Cloning, characterization and molecular docking of a highly thermostable β-1,4-glucosidase from Thermotoga petrophila. Biotechnol Lett. 2012. September;34(9):1703–9. 10.1007/s10529-012-0953-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reilly MC, Kim J, Lynn J, Simmons BA, Gladden JM, Magnuson JK, et al. Forward genetics screen coupled with whole-genome resequencing identifies novel gene targets for improving heterologous enzyme production in Aspergillus niger. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018. February;102(4):1797–807. 10.1007/s00253-017-8717-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chiang Y-M, Meyer KM, Praseuth M, Baker SE, Bruno KS, Wang CCC. Characterization of a polyketide synthase in Aspergillus niger whose product is a precursor for both dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) melanin and naphtho-γ-pyrone. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011. April;48(4):430–7. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zheng Y-M, Lin F-L, Gao H, Zou G, Zhang J-W, Wang G-Q, et al. Development of a versatile and conventional technique for gene disruption in filamentous fungi based on CRISPR-Cas9 technology. Sci Rep. 2017. August 23;7(1):9250 10.1038/s41598-017-10052-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sugawara N, Haber JE. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992. February;12(2):563–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Imran M, Asad M, Gulfraz M, Qureshi R, Gul H, Manzoor N, et al. Glucoamylase production from Aspergillus niger by using solid state fermentation process. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2010. April 3; [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhu X, Wang MH, Qiu R, Liu L, Dong Z, Tang G. The synergetic effects of two CCAAT boxes in Aspergillus niger glaA gene promoter on activation of PglaA transcription. Sci China, C, Life Sci. 2004. April;47(2):139–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Horlbeck MA, Witkowsky LB, Guglielmi B, Replogle JM, Gilbert LA, Villalta JE, et al. Nucleosomes impede Cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro. elife. 2016. March 17;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jensen KT, Fløe L, Petersen TS, Huang J, Xu F, Bolund L, et al. Chromatin accessibility and guide sequence secondary structure affect CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing efficiency. FEBS Lett. 2017. June 28;591(13):1892–901. 10.1002/1873-3468.12707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nødvig CS, Hoof JB, Kogle ME, Jarczynska ZD, Lehmbeck J, Klitgaard DK, et al. Efficient oligo nucleotide mediated CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in Aspergilli. Fungal Genet Biol. 2018. June;115:78–89. 10.1016/j.fgb.2018.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Song L, Ouedraogo J-P, Kolbusz M, Nguyen TTM, Tsang A. Efficient genome editing using tRNA promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA in Aspergillus niger. PLoS ONE. 2018. August 24;13(8):e0202868 10.1371/journal.pone.0202868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zischewski J, Fischer R, Bortesi L. Detection of on-target and off-target mutations generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and other sequence-specific nucleases. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35(1):95–104. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schuster M, Schweizer G, Reissmann S, Kahmann R. Genome editing in Ustilago maydis using the CRISPR-Cas system. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016. April;89:3–9. 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gems D, Johnstone IL, Clutterbuck AJ. An autonomously replicating plasmid transforms Aspergillus nidulans at high frequency. Gene. 1991. February;98(1):61–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Haeussler M, Schönig K, Eckert H, Eschstruth A, Mianné J, Renaud J-B, et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 2016. July 5;17(1):148 10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ruiz-Díez B. Strategies for the transformation of filamentous fungi. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92(2):189–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li D, Tang Y, Lin J, Cai W. Methods for genetic transformation of filamentous fungi. Microb Cell Fact. 2017. October 3;16(1):168 10.1186/s12934-017-0785-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.