Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2018 Dec 21;20(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010020

Dietary l-Tryptophan Supplementation Enhances the Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Function in Weaned Piglets: Implication of Tryptophan-Metabolizing Microbiota

Haiwei Liang 1,2, Zhaolai Dai 2, Jiao Kou 2, Kaiji Sun 2, Jingqing Chen 2, Ying Yang 2, Guoyao Wu 2,3, Zhenlong Wu 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6337174  PMID: 30577574

Abstract

l-Tryptophan (Trp) is known to play an important role in the health of the large intestine. However, a role of dietary Trp in the small-intestinal mucosal barrier and microbiota remains poorly understood. The present study was conducted with weaned piglets to address this issue. Postweaning piglets were fed for 4 weeks a corn- and soybean meal-based diet supplemented with 0 (Control), 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4% Trp. The small-intestinal microbiota and serum amino acids were analyzed by bacterial 16S rRNA gene-based high-throughput sequencing methods and high-performance liquid chromatography, respectively. The mRNA levels for genes involved in host defense and the abundances of tight-junction proteins in jejunum and duodenum were measured by real time-PCR and Western blot techniques, respectively. The concentrations of Trp in the serum of Trp-supplemented piglets increased in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with the control group, dietary supplementation with 0.2–0.4% Trp reduced the abundances of Clostridium sensu stricto and Streptococcus in the jejunum, increased the abundances of Lactobacillus and Clostridium XI (two species of bacteria that can metabolize Trp) in the jejunum, and augmented the concentrations of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) as well as mRNA levels for porcine β-defensins 2 and 3 in jejunal tissues. Moreover, dietary Trp supplementation activated the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling and increased the abundances of tight-junction proteins (zonula occludens (ZO)-1, ZO-3, and claudin-1) in jejunum and duodenum. We suggested that Trp-metabolizing bacteria in the small intestine of weaned pigs primarily mediated the beneficial effects of dietary Trp on its mucosal integrity, health, and function.

Keywords: tryptophan, microbiota, mucosal defense, tight junction proteins, piglets

1. Introduction

The commensal microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract has a profound effect on the maintenance of the small intestine, protection against invasive pathogens, and the maturation of the immune system, thereby benefiting the health of the host [1,2,3]. Both genetic and environmental factors (including stress and dietary nutrients) contribute to the intestinal homeostasis in humans and animals by regulating flora colonization [4,5,6]. Consistently, perturbation of the intestinal ecosystem is associated with impaired mucosal barrier function and enhanced susceptibility to various intestinal diseases [7,8,9]. Specifically, weaning stress, an inevitable event for infants and piglets, reconstructs the microbial ecological community in the gastrointestinal tract [10,11]. Recent studies have emphasized that dietary nutrients are critical factors affecting intestinal mucosal barrier function by regulating the intestinal microbiota of the host and inhibiting the colonization of pathogenic bacteria [12]. The intestinal flora can actively utilize dietary amino acids for protein synthesis and can modify the amino acid profile in the plasma of the host [13]. Interestingly, dietary supplementation with amino acids influences the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota, thus improving intestinal function [14,15].

l-Tryptophan (Trp) is a nutritionally essential amino acid in all animals. Results of in vitro studies indicate that Trp enhances the expression of tight junction proteins and promotes protein synthesis in intestinal porcine epithelial cells [16]. Dietary Trp is metabolized by the intestinal microbiota, liver, brain, and activated immunocytes [17]. About 25% of dietary Trp is catabolized by the small intestine in the first pass in weaned piglets [18,19]. Our previous studies with enterocytes isolated from piglets show that intestinal epithelial cells do not degrade Trp [16,20], indicating that intestinal bacteria are primarily responsible for the use of dietary Trp by the small intestine.

Recent studies have reported the existence of Trp-metabolizing bacteria in the small intestine, including Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, L. lactis subsp. lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacteroides, Streptococcus thermophilus, Escherichia coli K-12, Morganella morganii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Hafnia alvei [21,22]. These bacteria can convert Trp to serotonin, indole, tryptamine, skatole, and indole acetate [17,23]. The metabolites of Trp can modify intestinal microbial composition, microbial metabolism, and the host-microbiome interface [17]. Dietary Trp supplementation improves the growth of weanling piglets and regulates the composition of the microbiota in their hindgut [24]. However, it remains unknown whether the Trp-metabolizing bacteria in the small intestine may contribute to the mucosal barrier function in Trp-supplemented piglets.

The present study was conducted with weaned piglets to test the hypothesis that dietary Trp could enhance the intestinal mucosal barrier function by enhancing defensin expression, regulating the abundance of tight junction proteins, activating the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, and promoting the enrichment of bacteria that can utilize Trp in the small intestine. The pig was used because it is a useful animal model for studying human nutrition and metabolism [15]. These two species share similarities in anatomy, physiology, metabolism, and intestinal microbiome [25,26,27].

2. Results

2.1. Concentrations of Amino Acids (AAs) in Serum

Compared with the control group, the concentration of Trp in the serum of weaned pigs was increased (p < 0.05) in a dose-dependent manner in response to dietary supplementation with Trp. The concentrations of L-glutamate, L-asparagine, L-histidine, and taurine in serum were elevated (p < 0.05) by the supplementation with 0.2% Trp, as compared with the controls. However, dietary supplementation with 0.1% Trp had no effect on the serum concentrations of amino acids except for L-glutamate, L-asparagine, and Trp (Table 1).

Table 1.

The concentrations of amino acids in the serum of weaned piglets receiving dietary supplementation with l-tryptophan 1.

Item (nmol/mL) Dietary Supplementation SEM p-Value
0% Trp 0.1% Trp 0.2% Trp 0.4% Trp
l-Asparate 49 50 56 52 1.69 0.536
l-Glutamate 144 b 155 ab 160 a 156 ab 2.62 0.035
l-Asparagine 80 b 86 ab 91 ab 103 a 3.79 0.036
l-Serine 196 198 214 204 5.03 0.608
l-Glutamine 540 540 571 558 10.3 0.692
l-Histidine 69 b 70 b 83 a 76 ab 2.30 0.031
Glycine 1139 1158 1220 1249 32.3 0.611
l-Threonine 114 121 122 135 3.71 0.254
l-Citruline 70 82 86 86 3.74 0.367
l-Arginine 222 230 234 259 11.6 0.731
Taurine 178 b 212 b 252 a 231 ab 9.18 0.020
l-Alanine 672 636 643 585 15.8 0.276
l-Tyrosine 124 127 129 139 5.42 0.812
l-Tryptophan 36 d 52 c 85 b 105 a 5.95 0.001
l-Methionine 41 43 42 47 2.01 0.737
l-Valine 200 201 217 241 7.89 0.218
l-Phenylalanine 100 89 100 100 2.66 0.350
l-Isoleucine 126 126 132 142 3.74 0.387
l-Leucine 215 214 216 234 6.06 0.620
l-Ornithine 116 123 141 143 5.34 0.192
l-Lysine 133 136 153 146 8.05 0.815

1 Values are means with the pooled SEM, n = 6. a, b, c, d Within a row, means not sharing the same superscript letter differ, p < 0.05.

2.2. Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in the Small Intestine

Compared with the control group, the abundances of zonula occluden (ZO)-1, ZO-3, and claudin-1 proteins in the jejunum of weaned pigs were enhanced (p < 0.05) by dietary supplementation with both 0.2% and 0.4% Trp, whereas the protein abundance of occludin was elevated only by 0.4% Trp supplementation (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). The protein level of ZO-1 (Supplementary Figure S1A) in the duodenum was enhanced (p < 0.05) by 0.2% Trp, but not by 0.4% Trp. Additionally, the abundances of ZO-3 (Supplementary Figure S1B), claudin-1 (Supplementary Figure S1C), and occludin (Supplementary Figure S1D) were augmented (p < 0.05) by Trp supplementation in the duodenum.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Protein abundances of ZO-1, ZO-3, claudin-1, and occludin in the jejunum of weaned piglets receiving dietary supplementation with 0% (Control, Ctrl), 0.2%, or 0.4% Trp. Western blot analyses of ZO-1 (A), ZO-3 (B), claudin-1 (C), and occludin (D) were performed. Values are means ± SEM, n = 6. Means without a common letter differ, p < 0.05.

2.3. Gene Expression of Porcine β-Defensin (pBD) and Secretory Immunoglobulin A (sIgA) Concentrations in the Jejunal Mucosa

To explore the effect of dietary Trp supplementation on the mucosal defense, quantitative real-time PCR and ELISA assays were performed to determine mRNA levels of pBDs and the secretion of sIgA, respectively. Dietary supplementation with Trp (0.2%) increased (p < 0.05) the concentration of jejunal sIgA, whereas dietary supplementation with 0.2% or 0.4% Trp up-regulated (p < 0.05) jejunal pBD-2 and pBD-3 gene expression without affecting the pBD-1 gene expression (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Dietary supplementation with Trp enhanced pBD expression and sIgA secretion in the small intestine of weaned piglets. (AC) The mRNA levels of pBD-1, pBD-2, and pBD-3 in the mucosa of the jejunum. n = 6; and (D) the expression of sIgA in the mucosa of the jejunum. Values are means ± SEM, n = 6. Means without a common letter differ, p < 0.05. Ctrl, the control group (% Trp).

2.4. The mTOR Signaling Pathway in the Small Intestine

The abundance of protein kinase B (AKT) was enhanced (p < 0.05) by dietary Trp supplementation in both the jejunum and the duodenum (p < 0.05) (Figure 3A and Supplementary Figure S2A). In the jejunum, the abundances of p-mTOR (Figure 3B), p-4E (eIF4E)-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) (Figure 3C), and p-p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (P70S6K) (Figure 3D) were enhanced (p < 0.05) by dietary supplementation with 0.2% or 0.4% Trp. In the duodenum, the abundances of p-mTOR (Supplementary Figure S2B) and p-P70S6K (Supplementary Figure S2D) were enhanced (p < 0.05) by dietary supplementation with both 0.2% and 0.4% Trp, whereas the protein levels of total 4E-BP1 (Supplementary Figure S2C) and total ribosomal P70S6K were not affected (p > 0.05) by dietary Trp.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Dietary supplementation with Trp activated the mTOR signaling pathway in the jejunum of weaned piglets. Protein abundances of AKT (A), p-mTOR (B), p-4E-BP1 (C), and p-P70S6K (D) were determined. Values are means ± SEM, n = 6. Means without a common letter differ, p < 0.05. Ctrl, the control group (% Trp).

2.5. Composition and Diversity of the Jejunal Microbiota

Dietary Trp supplementation altered (p < 0.05) the composition and diversity of the jejunal microbiota, especially the abundance of Trp-utilizing bacteria. After size filtering, quality control, and chimera checking, a total of 35,932 ± 921, 35,808 ± 943, and 30,309 ± 795 reads were observed in the 0%, 0.2%, and 0.4% Trp groups, respectively. Operational taxonomical units (OTUs) were obtained at a sequence-similarity level of 97%, and the number of OTUs in the 0.2% Trp group was higher than that in the control and 0.4% Trp groups. These alterations were accompanied with changes in Chao1 and observed species values (p < 0.05, Table 2). Furthermore, dietary Trp supplementation affected the abundance of Trp-metabolizing bacteria, such as an increase (p < 0.05) in the abundance of Lactobacillus and Clostridium XI, while reducing (p < 0.05) the abundance of opportunistic pathogens Clostridium sensu stricto and Streptococcus at the genus level (Figure 4A). The shaped bacterial composition at the phylum, class, order, and family levels are shown in Supplementary Figure S3. The principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was used to assess β diversity among the three diet groups based on the unweighted unifrac distances, showing that the Trp supplementation groups formed a distinct cluster that was well separated from the control group along the first principal coordinates (Figure 4B). Based on the results of the heatmap, which can reflect the actual similarities and differences in the community composition of the samples, 22 genera in the jejunal microbiome were altered by dietary Trp supplementation (Figure 5).

Table 2.

Effects of dietary supplementation with Trp on the α diversity indices (Chao1, Observed species, Shannon, and Simpson) and OTUs 1.

Items Dietary Supplementation SEM p-Value
0% Trp 0.2% Trp 0.4% Trp
Chao1 127 b 373 a 304 a 39.0 0.009
Observed species 87 c 307 a 242 b 34.5 0.009
Shannon 2.03 3.56 3.34 0.39 0.240
Simpson 0.55 0.74 0.73 0.07 0.459
OTUs 110 c 349 a 276 b 35.5 0.003

1 Values are means with the pooled SEM. a, b, c Within a row, means not sharing the same superscript letter differ, p < 0.05.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Microbiota composition and diversity in the jejunum of weaned piglets receiving dietary supplementation with Trp. (A) the composition of microbiota that was altered by Trp, and (B) the effect of Trp on the β diversity of the microbiota community. Ctrl, the control group (% Trp).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Heatmap cluster analysis of the bacteria at the genus level. The heatmap is color-coded based on row z-scores.

3. Discussion

The intestinal microbiota has an important impact on key physiological functions in the host intestine, including metabolism, immune system maturation, and nutritional homeostasis [1,2,3]. Importantly, dietary factors have been reported to regulate the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota, therefore forming a crosstalk to modify the physiology and health of the host [28]. Despite a vast number of studies on the interaction between intestinal microbiota and host, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. As a nutritionally essential amino acid, Trp has been reported to enhance intestinal protein synthesis and regulate the expression of tight junction proteins and intestinal transporters to benefit intestinal mucosal barrier function in humans and animals [16,22]. Of note, we found that intestinal porcine epithelial cells cannot degrade Trp [16,20], indicating a critical role of intestinal bacteria on Trp metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract. Our recent study showed that Trp supplementation could modulate the composition of microbiota in the hindgut of weaned piglets [24]. However, it is unknown whether the composition of bacteria in the small intestine, especially those that can metabolize Trp, can be regulated by Trp supplementation in weaned piglets.

In the present study, a corn- and soybean-based diet was formulated, according to nutritional requirements for weaned piglet. The basal diet contained 0.2% Trp and was supplemented with 0% (Control), 0.1%, 0.2%, or 0.4% Trp. We found that the concentrations of l-glutamate, l-asparagine, l-histidine, and taurine in serum were elevated in the 0.2% Trp group, as compared with the controls. It is possible that Trp modulates the intestinal absorption and whole-body metabolism of these amino acids in young piglets. However, the underlying mechanisms are currently unknown.

The intestinal mucosal barrier is maintained mainly by tight-junction proteins located between the epithelial cells [29]. We found that the abundances of ZO-1, ZO-3, occludin, and claudin-1 proteins in both the duodenum and the jejunum were upregulated by dietary supplementation with 0.2% or 0.4% Trp. This result is in agreement with our in vitro data from studies involving intestinal porcine epithelial cells [16] and a report that dietary Trp enhances the expression of tight-junction proteins in the intestine piglets infected by Escherichia coli [30]. Considering that the protein abundances of ZO-1, ZO-3, occludin, and claudin-1 were enhanced by Trp, it is imperative to determine whether Trp can exert such an effect in a bacteria-challenged model.

Host defense peptides exert both antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities, and contribute to epithelial immune defense [31]. pBD is a major group of porcine antimicrobial peptides and plays an important role in both mucosal barrier function and immune response due to their antimicrobial, chemotactic, and regulatory activities [32,33]. Weaning stress and pathogen infection are associated with reduced expression of β-defensin [11,34]. Consistently, overexpression or exogenous supply of pBD improves the intestinal integrity and growth performance of weaned piglets [35]. Interestingly, we found that the mRNA levels of pBD-2 and pBD-3 were enhanced by Trp supplementation, indicating a regulatory effect of Trp on intestinal pBD gene expression. Furthermore, recent study has shown that the expression of defensins is tightly associated with the activation of mTOR cell signaling [36]. Consistently, we found that the expression of mTOR and its target genes in the 0.2% Trp group was higher than that in the 0.4% Trp group, indicating that an appropriate dosage of Trp was favorable for both the activation of mTOR cell signaling and the expression of the defensins. In addition to defensins, Trp supplementation also stimulated sIgA expression in the piglet small intestine. This protein plays an integral role in protecting the intestine against pathogen adherence by forming a mucus layer in the intestine [37,38]. These regulatory effects of Trp may be brought about through four mechanisms. First, Trp serves as a substrate for the intestinal synthesis of peptides and proteins, including pBD and sIgA [39]. Second, Trp regulates the expression of the pBD and sIgA genes through the Sirt1/ERK/90RSK signaling pathway [40]. Third, Trp can activate the mTOR cell signaling pathway in porcine enterocytes [16]. Fourth, the increased abundance of sIgA may be due to the altered microbiota composition following Trp supplementation, as the gut microbiota interacts directly or indirectly with the host immune system [12].

Intestinal microbiota dysfunction has been reported to be associated with impaired intestinal mucosal barrier and reduced growth performance in piglets [11]. In the present study, we found that the number of OTUs of the jejunal microbial flora and species richness (Chao1 and Observed species value) was increased by dietary Trp, indicating a regulatory effect on the intestinal microbiota in piglets. Several types of intestinal bacteria, such as Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, L. lactis subsp. lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacteroides, Streptococcus thermophilus, Escherichia coli, Morganella morganii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Hafnia alvei, and Clostridium, have tryptophanase for Trp catabolism [41] to maintain bacterial growth and survival [21,22,23,42,43,44]. Importantly, metabolites produced by these bacteria can regulate intestinal microbiota diversity and benefit the host [17]. In our study, the abundances of Lactobacillus and Clostridium XI in the small intestine were enhanced, whereas those of Clostridium sensu stricto and Streptococcus (two opportunistic pathogens of the intestine) were reduced by dietary Trp supplementation. Lactobacillus has been regarded as a beneficial intestinal bacterium for intestinal health in humans and animals [45], including weanling piglets [46]. An increase in the abundance of bacillius and a decrease in the abundances of opportunistic pathogens can contribute to an improved intestinal ecosystem. Of note, the regulatory effect of Trp on Trp-metabolizing bacteria was observed in the jejunum, instead of the hindgut [24], indicating a different response of different segment of the gastrointestinal tract to dietary Trp supplementation. The exact reason for this phenomenon remains unknown. It is possible that supplemental Trp does not enter the large intestine of pigs, because it is both absorbed into enterocytes and utilized by bacteria in the small intestine. It is also possible that the small intestine might be a suitable environment for the survival and colonization of Trp-metabolizing bacteria in piglets.

In conclusion, results of the present study indicate that dietary supplementation with Trp enhanced the intestinal mucosal barrier function as shown by the enhanced abundances of tight-junction proteins, as well as the upregulation of pBD and sIgA expression. These beneficial effects of Trp was associated with the activation of mTOR signaling and the enrichment of Trp-metabolizing bacteria in the small intestine of weaned pigs. Adequate provision of dietary Trp may be a nutritional strategy to improve intestinal mucosal barrier integrity, health and function in animals.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Design and Animals

All animal treatment and experimental procedures were approved by the China Agricultural University Animal Care Committee (No. CAU-DKY-20160308, 08 September 2016). A total of 168 crossbred weaned piglets (Landrace × Yorkshire) with similar bodyweights (7.6 kg of average BW, weaned at 24 d of age) were randomly assigned into one of the 4 groups: 0 (Control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% supplemental Trp. l-Alanine was used to formulate isonitrogenous diets, as previously described [47]. Briefly, l-alanine is not toxic and can be extensively catabolized by pigs [48]. Additionally, in contrast to glycine and glutamate (substrate for the synthesis of glutamine and glutathione), which were confirmed as functional amino acids in the regulation of antioxidant function, l-alanine was not an antioxidant [49,50]. Additionally, dietary supplementation with glutamate, glycine, aspartate, and metabolites of tyrosine (dopa and dopamine) may alter food intake of pigs, due to their neuromodulator activity [51]. Furthermore, interconversion of biosynthesizable amino acids should not be ignored in animal nutrition [52]. For example, serine and asparagine are readily converted to glycine and aspartate in animals, respectively [53]. Therefore, among biosynthesizable amino acids, l-alanine is most appropriate for the isonitrogenous control. Each treatment group consisted of 6 pens (7 piglets/pen). The supplemental levels of Trp were based on a previous study showing that 0.23% supplemental Trp could increase the feed intake and body weight gain of piglets without any adverse effect [54]. The basal diet was formulated to meet nutritional requirements (NRC, 2012) of piglets throughout phase I (7–11 kg BW) (Supplementary Table S1) and phase II (11–25 kg BW) (Supplementary Table S2). In the present study, the day of weaning was recorded as day 0 of the experimental period. At the end of a four-week period of Trp supplementation, 24 piglets (8 from each of the 0, 0.2, and 0.4% Trp groups) were sacrificed by exsanguination. These three groups were chosen because dietary supplementation with 0.1% Trp had no effect on the growth performance of weaned piglets (Supplementary Table S3). Blood samples, the small intestinal tissues, and small intestinal contents were obtained from pigs in each treatment group. Serum, the small intestine, and intestinal contents were frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at –80 °C for later analysis.

4.2. Determination of Serum AAs by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

The concentrations of AAs in serum were analyzed by HPLC methods as previously described [55], except that a model of Waters 2690 (Waters Chromatography Division, Milford, MA, USA) was used for separation and quantification.

4.3. Extraction of Proteins and Western Blot Analysis

Frozen duodenal and jejunal tissues were homogenized in liquid nitrogen for protein extraction and the analysis of protein abundance with the using of Western blot technique as previously described [56]. Briefly, 40 μg of protein was separated on 12% acrylamide SDS-PAGE gels, and then proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed-milk solution for 30 min at room temperature (25 °C), and then probed with a primary antibody overnight at 4 °C and subsequently incubated with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The protein bands were detected with the Image Quant LAS 4000 mini system (GE Healthcare) and quantified with the use of the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the tissues of jejunum using the Trizol reagent (Takara, Takara Biomedical Technology in Beijing. China), followed by reverse transcription using the High Capacity cDNA Archive kit (Takara), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Real-time PCR was carried out by the ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) involving the use of SYBR Green. The primer sequences used for the mRNA determined were listed in Supplementary Table S4. The relative abundance of a target gene was calculated by the ΔΔCt method [57].

4.5. Measurements for sIgA

The jejunal mucosa (0.1 g) were mixed with 0.1 mL physiological saline by tissue homogenate. Then sIgA was determined by using a porcine ELISA kit (Lianshuo Biochemical Reagent Company, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.6. DNA Extraction and Bacterial 16S Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) Gene Sequencing

Jejunal bacteria were subjected to genomic DNA isolation with the use of the Qiagen DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of isolated DNA was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and then was stored at −20 °C until further processing. The 16S RNA V3-V4 gene region was amplified by using the primers F341 and R806 [58] and the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq sequencing platform at the Realbio Genomics Institute (Shanghai, China). Sequences were quality filtered and clustered into OTUs at 97% identity [59].

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Data on serum AAs, α diversity indices (Chao1, Observed species, Shannon, and Simpson), protein abundances, and gene expression were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Duncan multiple comparison method (SPSS statistical software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance. α diversity (Chao1, observed species, Shannon index, and Simpson index) was assessed by MOTHUR v.1.35.0 [60]. β diversity was calculated based on unweighted unifrac distances by QIIME. An unweighted unifrac PCoA based on OTUs was performed to provide an overview of the microbial diversity and composition in the pig jejunum.

Abbreviations

AAs Amino acids
AKT Protein kinase B
4E-BP1 4E (eIF4E)-binding protein 1
HPLC High-performance liquid chromatography
mTOR Mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin
OTUs Operational taxonomical units
pBD Porcine β-defensin
PCoA Principal coordinates analysis
p70S6K p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase
sIgA Secretory immunoglobulin A
Trp l-Tryptophan
ZO Zonula occluden

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/1/20/s1.

Author Contributions

G.W. and Z.W. designed the research; H.L., Z.D. and J.K. conducted the research; H.L., K.S., J.C. and G.W. analyzed the data; H.L., Y.Y., Z.W. and G.W. wrote the paper; Z.W. and G.W. had responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31625025, 31572410, 31572412, 31572423, 31372327, 31301979), and Texas A&M AgriLife Research (H-8200).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Lamas B., Richard M.L., Leducq V., Pham H.P., Michel M.L., Da Costa G., Bridonneau C., Jegou S., Hoffmann T.W., Natividad J.M., et al. CARD9 impacts colitis by altering gut microbiota metabolism of tryptophan into aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands. Nat. Med. 2016;22:598–605. doi: 10.1038/nm.4102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Turnbaugh P.J., Ley R.E., Mahowald M.A., Magrini V., Mardis E.R., Gordon J.I. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–1031. doi: 10.1038/nature05414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kamada N., Kim Y.G., Sham H.P., Vallance B.A., Puente J.L., Martens E.C., Nunez G. Regulated virulence controls the ability of a pathogen to compete with the gut microbiota. Science. 2012;336:1325–1329. doi: 10.1126/science.1222195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Turnbaugh P.J., Hamady M., Yatsunenko T., Cantarel B.L., Duncan A., Ley R.E., Sogin M.L., Jones W.J., Roe B.A., Affourtit J.P., et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009;457:U480–U487. doi: 10.1038/nature07540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Benson A.K., Kelly S.A., Legge R., Ma F., Low S.J., Kim J., Zhang M., Oh P.L., Nehrenberg D., Hua K., et al. Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:18933–18938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007028107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.David L.A., Maurice C.F., Carmody R.N., Gootenberg D.B., Button J.E., Wolfe B.E., Ling A.V., Devlin A.S., Varma Y., Fischbach M.A., et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505:559–563. doi: 10.1038/nature12820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Macfarlane S., Bahrami B., Macfarlane G.T. Mucosal biofilm communities in the human intestinal tract. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2011;75:111–143. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387046-9.00005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferreira C.M., Vieira A.T., Vinolo M.A., Oliveira F.A., Curi R., Martins Fdos S. The central role of the gut microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases. J. Immunol. Res. 2014;2014:689492. doi: 10.1155/2014/689492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Silva M.J., Carneiro M.B., dos Anjos Pultz B., Pereira Silva D., Lopes M.E., dos Santos L.M. The multifaceted role of commensal microbiota in homeostasis and gastrointestinal diseases. J. Immunol. Res. 2015;2015:321241. doi: 10.1155/2015/321241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Frese S.A., Parker K., Calvert C.C., Mills D.A. Diet shapes the gut microbiome of pigs during nursing and weaning. Microbiome. 2015;3:28. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0091-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gresse R., Chaucheyras-Durand F., Fleury M.A., Van de Wiele T., Forano E., Blanquet-Diot S. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in postweaning piglets: Understanding the keys to health. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:851–873. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tilg H., Moschen A.R. Food, immunity, and the microbiome. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1107–1119. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bergen W.G. Small-intestinal or colonic microbiota as a potential amino acid source in animals. Amino Acids. 2015;47:251–258. doi: 10.1007/s00726-014-1875-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dai Z.L., Li X.L., Xi P.B., Zhang J., Wu G., Zhu W.Y. Regulatory role for L-arginine in the utilization of amino acids by pig small-intestinal bacteria. Amino Acids. 2012;43:233–244. doi: 10.1007/s00726-011-1067-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dai Z., Wu Z., Hang S., Zhu W., Wu G. Amino acid metabolism in intestinal bacteria and its potential implications for mammalian reproduction. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2015;21:389–409. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gav003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang H., Ji Y., Wu G., Sun K., Sun Y., Li W., Wang B., He B., Zhang Q., Dai Z., et al. l-Tryptophan Activates Mammalian Target of Rapamycin and Enhances Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cells. J. Nutr. 2015;145:1156–1162. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.209817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gao J., Xu K., Liu H., Liu G., Bai M., Peng C., Li T., Yin Y. Impact of the Gut Microbiota on Intestinal Immunity Mediated by Tryptophan Metabolism. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018;8:13. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wu G. Functional amino acids in growth, reproduction, and health. Adv. Nutr. 2010;1:31–37. doi: 10.3945/an.110.1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stoll B., Burrin D.G. Measuring splanchnic amino acid metabolism in vivo using stable isotopic tracers. J. Anim. Sci. 2006;84:E60–E72. doi: 10.2527/2006.8413_supplE60x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen L., Li P., Wang J., Li X., Gao H., Yin Y., Hou Y., Wu G. Catabolism of nutritionally essential amino acids in developing porcine enterocytes. Amino Acids. 2009;37:143–152. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0268-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ozogul F., Hamed I. The importance of lactic acid bacteria for the prevention of bacterial growth and their biogenic amines formation: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017:1–11. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1277972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O’Mahony S.M., Clarke G., Borre Y.E., Dinan T.G., Cryan J.F. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav. Brain Res. 2015;277:32–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yokoyama M.T., Carlson J.R. Microbial metabolites of tryptophan in the intestinal tract with special reference to skatole. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1979;32:173–178. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/32.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liang H., Dai Z., Liu N., Ji Y., Chen J., Zhang Y., Yang Y., Li J., Wu Z., Wu G. Dietary l-Tryptophan Modulates the Structural and Functional Composition of the Intestinal Microbiome in Weaned Piglets. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1736. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lamendella R., Domingo J.W., Ghosh S., Martinson J., Oerther D.B. Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Heinritz S.N., Mosenthin R., Weiss E. Use of pigs as a potential model for research into dietary modulation of the human gut microbiota. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2013;26:191–209. doi: 10.1017/S0954422413000152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guilloteau P., Zabielski R., Hammon H.M., Metges C.C. Nutritional programming of gastrointestinal tract development. Is the pig a good model for man? Nutr. Res. Rev. 2010;23:4–22. doi: 10.1017/S0954422410000077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kennedy P.J., Cryan J.F., Dinan T.G., Clarke G. Kynurenine pathway metabolism and the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Neuropharmacology. 2017;112:399–412. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Peterson L.W., Artis D. Intestinal epithelial cells: Regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:141–153. doi: 10.1038/nri3608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Messori S., Trevisi P., Simongiovanni A., Priori D., Bosi P. Effect of susceptibility to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4 and of dietary tryptophan on gut microbiota diversity observed in healthy young pigs. Vet. Microbiol. 2013;162:173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bevins C.L., Martin-Porter E., Ganz T. Defensins and innate host defence of the gastrointestinal tract. Gut. 1999;45:911–915. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.6.911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Veldhuizen E.J., Rijnders M., Claassen E.A., van Dijk A., Haagsman H.P. Porcine beta-defensin 2 displays broad antimicrobial activity against pathogenic intestinal bacteria. Mol. Immunol. 2008;45:386–394. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yoon J.H., Ingale S.L., Kim J.S., Kim K.H., Lohakare J., Park Y.K., Park J.C., Kwon I.K., Chae B.J. Effects of dietary supplementation with antimicrobial peptide-P5 on growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility, faecal and intestinal microflora and intestinal morphology of weanling pigs. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2013;93:587–592. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Starner T.D., Agerberth B., Gudmundsson G.H., McCray P.B., Jr. Expression and activity of beta-defensins and LL-37 in the developing human lung. J. Immunol. 2005;174:1608–1615. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.3.1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tang Z., Xu L., Shi B., Deng H., Lai X., Liu J., Sun Z. Oral administration of synthetic porcine beta-defensin-2 improves growth performance and cecal microbial flora and down-regulates the expression of intestinal toll-like receptor-4 and inflammatory cytokines in weaned piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;87:1258–1266. doi: 10.1111/asj.12540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hashimoto T., Perlot T., Rehman A., Trichereau J., Ishiguro H., Paolino M., Sigl V., Hanada T., Hanada R., Lipinski S., et al. ACE2 links amino acid malnutrition to microbial ecology and intestinal inflammation. Nature. 2012;487:477–481. doi: 10.1038/nature11228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Phalipon A., Cardona A., Kraehenbuhl J.P., Edelman L., Sansonetti P.J., Corthesy B. Secretory component: A new role in secretory IgA-mediated immune exclusion in vivo. Immunity. 2002;17:107–115. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00341-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ushida K., Kameue C., Tsukahara T., Fukuta K., Nakanishi N. Decreasing traits of fecal immunoglobulin A in neonatal and weaning piglets. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2008;70:849–852. doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yi D., Li B., Hou Y., Wang L., Zhao D., Chen H., Wu T., Zhou Y., Ding B., Wu G. Dietary supplementation with an amino acid blend enhances intestinal function in piglets. Amino Acids. 2018;50:1089–1100. doi: 10.1007/s00726-018-2586-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ren M., Zhang S., Liu X., Li S., Mao X., Zeng X., Qiao S. Different lipopolysaccharide branched-chain amino acids modulate porcine intestinal endogenous beta-defensin expression through the Sirt1/ERK/90RSK Pathway. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64:3371–3379. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li G., Young K.D. Indole production by the tryptophanase TnaA in Escherichia coli is determined by the amount of exogenous tryptophan. Microbiology. 2013;159:402–410. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.064139-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shishov V.A., Kirovskaia T.A., Kudrin V.S., Oleskin A.V. Amine neuromediators, their precursors, and oxidation products in the culture of Escherichia coli K-12. Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol. 2009;45:550–554. doi: 10.1134/S0003683809050068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Smith E.A., Macfarlane G.T. Enumeration of human colonic bacteria producing phenolic and indolic compounds: Effects of pH, carbohydrate availability and retention time on dissimilatory aromatic amino acid metabolism. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1996;81:288–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb04331.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee J.H., Lee J. Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010;34:426–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Walter J. Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: Implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:4985–4996. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00753-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Konstantinov S.R., Awati A.A., Williams B.A., Miller B.G., Jones P., Stokes C.R., Akkermans A.D., Smidt H., de Vos W.M. Post-natal development of the porcine microbiota composition and activities. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;8:1191–1199. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang J., Chen L., Li P., Li X., Zhou H., Wang F., Li D., Yin Y., Wu G. Gene expression is altered in piglet small intestine by weaning and dietary glutamine supplementation. J. Nutr. 2008;138:1025–1032. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.6.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kim S.W., Wu G. Dietary arginine supplementation enhances the growth of milk-fed young pigs. J. Nutr. 2004;134:625–630. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.3.625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fang Y.Z., Yang S., Wu G. Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition. 2002;18:872–879. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00916-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wu G., Meier S.A., Knabe D.A. Dietary glutamine supplementation prevents jejunal atrophy in weaned pigs. J. Nutr. 1996;126:2578–2584. doi: 10.1093/jn/126.10.2578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li P., Yin Y.L., Li D., Kim S.W., Wu G. Amino acids and immune function. Br. J. Nutr. 2007;98:237–252. doi: 10.1017/S000711450769936X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wu G. Principles of Animal Nutrition. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wu G. Intestinal mucosal amino acid catabolism. J. Nutr. 1998;128:1249–1252. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.8.1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jansman A.J., van Diepen J.T., Melchior D. The effect of diet composition on tryptophan requirement of young piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2010;88:1017–1027. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wu G., Meininger C.J. Analysis of citrulline, arginine, and methylarginines using high-performance liquid chromatography. Methods Enzymol. 2008;440:177–189. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)00810-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang H., Zhang C., Wu G., Sun Y., Wang B., He B., Dai Z., Wu Z. Glutamine enhances tight junction protein expression and modulates corticotropin-releasing factor signaling in the jejunum of weanling piglets. J. Nutr. 2015;145:25–31. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.202515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fu W.J., Stromberg A.J., Viele K., Carroll R.J., Wu G. Statistics and bioinformatics in nutritional sciences: Analysis of complex data in the era of systems biology. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2010;21:561–572. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sun W., Qian X., Gu J., Wang X.J., Zhang L., Guo A.Y. Mechanisms and effects of arsanilic acid on antibiotic resistance genes and microbial communities during pig manure digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2017;234:217–223. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang Q., Garrity G.M., Tiedje J.M., Cole J.R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schloss P.D., Westcott S.L., Ryabin T., Hall J.R., Hartmann M., Hollister E.B., Lesniewski R.A., Oakley B.B., Parks D.H., Robinson C.J., et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES