Correction to: Combination of ELISA screening and seroneutralisation tests to expedite Zika virus seroprevalence studies

Correction to: Virol J

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1105-5

In the original publication of this article [1], Table 1 has some errors. The correct one is below:

Table 1.

Comparison of VNT and PRNT assays for a panel of 142 samples

VNT	PRNT50		PRNT90
	Positive (titre ≥10)	Negative (titre < 10)	Positive (titre ≥10)	Negative (titre < 10)
Positive (titre ≥40)	51	1	51	1
Negative (titre < 40)	9	81	1	89
Sensitivity of VNT (95% CI)	85% (51/60) (72.9–92.4%)		98.8% (51/52) (88.4–99.9%)
Specificity of VNT (95% CI)	98.7% (81/82) (92.4–99.9%)		98.8% (89/90) (93.1–99.9%)

The publisher apologizes to the readers and authors for the inconvenience.

The original publication has been corrected.