Table 3.
Step 1 – Criteria for “All Cause Dementia” | |
---|---|
Guideline | Procedures |
• Interferes with the ability to function at work or with usual abilities and | History & observation – |
• Represents a decline from previous ability and | • Evidence of changes in functioning reported by either patient and / or informant, or observed by clinician |
• Cannot be explained by delirium or major psychiatric disorder | |
Presence of cognitive impairment | History, observation, neuropsychological testings |
• History-taking from a knowledgeable informant | |
• Objective mental status testing and / or neuropsychological testing | |
• Neuropsychological testing is recommended when history and mental status testing cannot provide a confident diagnosis | |
The cognitive or behavioral impairment involves a minimum of two domains | History, observation, neuropsychological testing |
• Impaired ability to acquire / remember new information (e.g., repeating questions, forgetting events or appointments, becoming lost in familiar places). | |
• Impaired reasoning and handling of complex tasks, poor judgment (e.g., inability to handle finances, poor decision making) | |
• Impaired visuospatial abilities (e.g., difficulty recognizing faces or common objects) | |
• Impaired language function (speaking, reading, writing; e.g., difficulty thinking of common words while speaking, hesitations in speech) | |
• Changes in personality, behavior, comportment (e.g.,agitation, apathy, social withdrawal) | |
Difference between MCI and dementia | History & observation, |
• The fundamental difference between a diagnosis of dementia versus MCI depends upon whether or not there is a significant change in the ability to function at work or in daily activities. This will necessarily require clinical judgment based upon the information provided by the patient and a knowledgeable informant. |
Step 2: – Criteria for “Probable AD Dementia” | |
---|---|
Guideline | Procedures |
Meets criteria for dementia | See criteria above for dementia, Step 1 |
Insidious onset – symptoms have a gradual onset over months or years, not sudden over hours or days. | History |
• from patient and knowledgeable informant | |
Clear cut history of worsening of cognition | History, serial neuropsychological testing |
• from patient and knowledgeable informant | |
Initial cognitive deficits are evident and most prominent in one of the following categories | History, neuropsychological testing |
• Amnestic presentation – the most common presentation | Amnestic Presentation |
• Non-amnestic presentations: | • Impairment of learning and recall of recently learned information |
(1) Language presentation, | • Deficit in at least one other cognitive area) |
(2) Visuospatial presentation, | Nonamnestic presentations |
(3) executive dysfunction | • Language – most prominent deficits are word finding, but should also be deficits in other cognitive areas |
• Visuospatial -- most prominent deficits are spatial cognition, but should also be deficits in other cognitive areas | |
• Executive -- most prominent deficits are reasoning, judgment and problem solving, but should also be deficits in other cognitive areas | |
Diagnosis of AD should not be made when there is evidence of another dementing illness | History, neuropsychological testing, imaging studies, laboratory studies |
• Disorders to rule out include: | |
• Vascular Cognitive Impairment / Vascular Dementia | |
• Dementia with Lewy bodies | |
• Frontal-Temporal dementia – Behavioral variant | |
• Primary Progressive Aphasia | |
• Evidence of neurological disease or non-neurological condition or medication that could have a substantial effect on cognition |
Step 3: – Criteria for “Probable AD Dementia with increased level of certainty” | |
---|---|
Guideline | Procedures |
Meets criteria for AD dementia | See criteria above for AD dementia, Step 2 |
Probable AD dementia with documented decline | History, serial neuropsychological testing |
evidence of progressive cognitive decline on subsequent evaluations from | |
• knowledgeable informant or | |
• cognitive testing (either formal neuropsychological evaluation or standardized mental status examinations) | |
Probable AD dementia in a carrier of a causative AD genetic mutation | Laboratory studies |
Presence of an early-onset familial genetic mutation | |
• APP, PSEN1, or PSEN2 | |
(Note that the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele was not considered specific enough to meet criteria.) |
Step 4: – Evaluate the “Biomarker probability of AD etiology” | |
---|---|
Evaluate for atrophy of temporal (medial, basal, and lateral) and medial parietal cortex and other biomarkers when available and clinically useful. | Biomarkers |
• Although the use of biomarkers is not recommended routinely, they are available to the clinician when desired. | |
• There are two categories of biomarkers, those associated with Aβ protein deposition and those associated with downstream neurodegeneration (see Table 1) | |
• We recommend routine review of CT & MRI patterns of atrophy, a marker of downstream neurodegeneration. | |
• Presence of one biomarker category makes the “biomarker probability of AD etiology” “intermediate;” both categories must be positive for a “high” probability. The “lowest” probability is present if both categories are negative. |
Note: patients who would have met criteria under the 1984 guidelines would also meet criteria under the current guidelines.