ABSTRACT
Background: mHealth interventions have huge potential to reach large numbers of people in resource poor settings but have been criticised for lacking theory-driven design and rigorous evaluation. This paper shares the process we developed when developing an awareness raising and behaviour change focused mHealth intervention, through applying behavioural theory to in-depth qualitative research. It addresses an important gap in research regarding the use of theory and formative research to develop an mHealth intervention.
Objectives: To develop a theory-driven contextually relevant mHealth intervention aimed at preventing and managing diabetes among the general population in rural Bangladesh.
Methods: In-depth formative qualitative research (interviews and focus group discussions) were conducted in rural Faridpur. The data were analysed thematically and enablers and barriers to behaviour change related to lifestyle and the prevention of and management of diabetes were identified. In addition to the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour) model of behaviour change we selected the Transtheoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to be applied to the formative research in order to guide the development of the intervention.
Results: A six step-process was developed to outline the content of voice messages drawing on in-depth qualitative research and COM-B and TDF models. A table to inform voice messages was developed and acted as a guide to scriptwriters in the production of the messages.
Conclusions: In order to respond to the local needs of a community in Bangladesh, a process of formative research, drawing on behavioural theory helped in the development of awareness-raising and behaviour change mHealth messages through helping us to conceptualise and understand behaviour (for example by categorising behaviour into specific domains) and subsequently identify specific behavioural strategies to target the behaviour.
KEYWORDS: mHealth, behaviour change, message development, diabetes, Bangladesh
Background
mHealth in low- and middle-income countries
The low cost and accessibility of mobile technology means mHealth (the use of mobile technology in health) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has huge potential to reach and improve the health of large numbers of people [1–3]. Due to the nature of technology, mHealth can bypass some of the barriers to health access and knowledge of low-literacy, geographical remoteness and lack of finances [1].
Despite its potential, the evidence base for the effectiveness of mHealth interventions is limited. A review of 76 mHealth studies conducted in LMICs found while there is evidence of effectiveness of some interventions the overall quality and quantity of evidence is limited as many of the studies lack scale and rigorous evaluation [1]. It is possible that poor initial design is a contributing factor to the general lack of scale for mHealth interventions, it may also be that they have not been designed to reach scale. Another review of 16 intervention studies on mHealth covering a range of issues in Africa, Asia and multi-countries found a lack of consistent improvement in behaviour and weak evaluation methods [4]. It did highlight the importance of tailoring messages to an audience, using local language and understanding context to the interventions’ success. While many mHealth behaviour change interventions do not have a clear theoretical framework, a study by Ramachandran and colleagues provides a notable exception [5]. The study was a randomised control trial in India testing the effectiveness of mobile messaging on preventing type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among men aged 35–55 with impaired glucose tolerance [5]. The messages were based on the trans-theoretical model of behaviour change and the results indicated a 36% reduction in the incidence of diabetes among this high-risk group over two years [5]. A review of web-based interventions for diabetes management found that having a theoretical base increased the likelihood of success [6]. While there were only nine studies reviewed, most of which were based in high-income countries, their findings support the argument for theory-based approaches to behavioural mHealth interventions. A theoretical base to interventions means the intervention is underpinned and guided by a behavioural model and/or theory of change. Theory-based approaches may be more effective as theories help to explain behaviour and provide a rationale and focus for strategies.
As in other LMICs, despite poor infrastructure and weak health systems, mobile phone use and ownership in Bangladesh is widespread. An estimated 87% of rural households in Bangladesh owned at least one mobile phone in 2013 [7]. While the opportunity for mHealth to promote health has been recognised by NGOs and researchers, a recent scoping study of eHealth and mHealth initiatives in Bangladesh found that they are sporadic and disjointed with a lack of evidence of their effectiveness [8]. UCL and BADAS (the Diabetic Association of Bangladesh) set out to develop an mHealth intervention targeting awareness-raising and behaviour change related to diabetes prevention and control in rural Bangladesh. From the outset we aimed to address some of the gaps in research by ensuring the intervention is contextually relevant, grounded in theory and rigorously evaluated.
Diabetes in Bangladesh
There were an estimated 422 million adults living with diabetes in 2014 [9], with LMICs accounting for almost 80% of cases [10]. In Bangladesh diabetes affects an estimated 20% to 30% of the adult population either as intermediate hyperglycaemia or fully expressed diabetes mellitus [8]. Ninety percent of diabetes cases are type two diabetes, which is the result of an inadequate production or sensitivity to insulin [10]. Despite the high levels of diabetes, there are low levels of awareness about prevention, control and management of the condition [7] and the resource-poor health system is ill-equipped to meet the demands of the increasing diabetes burden [11].
As part of a three-arm cluster randomised trial [12], we set out to develop, implement and evaluate an mHealth intervention aimed at preventing and managing diabetes among the adult population in rural Bangladesh. Our intervention targeted adults aged over 30, and focused on modifiable risk factors relating to diabetes as recommended by the World Health Organisation [9]: care seeking, diet, physical activity, smoking and stress. The intervention consisted of people signing up (through a community recruitment drive) to receive one-minute voice messages twice a week for 14 months. From the outset we planned for the messages to be informative and entertaining, with professional scriptwriters involved in their production. In order to embed the messages in theory we planned to use the COM-B model of behaviour change [13] to inform the development of the voice messages. In-depth qualitative research in rural Bangladesh ensured the messages were relevant and tailored towards the needs of the message recipients. The content of the messages was therefore informed by both contextual research and the application of behavioural theory, as detailed in the current paper. The intervention developed, informed by this study, was tested as part of the randomised control trial.
Methods
Development and application of a process for creating content for voice messages was achieved through: 1. Formative research in intervention areas; and 2. Applying theory to formative research findings.
1. Formative research
Aim
The aim of the formative research was to describe the context of the interventions and inform the development of culturally sensitive, tailored mHealth messages. This included exploration of local understandings of diabetes mellitus and barriers and enablers to having a healthy lifestyle related to specific behaviours (care-seeking, diet, physical activity, smoking and stress).
Setting
Data were collected from three upazillas (sub-districts) of Faridpur district in central Bangladesh. Faridpur is 200 km2 with a population of 1.7 million. Farming (jute and rice) is the main livelihood source in the district. The population is mostly Bengali and 90% Muslim [14]. Data from our trial baseline survey in the area reveal approximately 10% of the population have diabetes and 20% have intermediate hyperglycaemia [15].
Sampling and data collection
In total 16 semi-structured interviews and nine focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted. Six diabetics (3 women, 3 men), 5 non-diabetics (3 women, 2 men) and 5 health care workers were interviewed. Focus group discussions were conducted with five groups of diabetics (3 women, 2 men) and 4 groups of non-diabetics (2 women, 2 men). Research respondents were purposively sampled. They were recruited through key informants, snowball sampling and the assistance of local staff from the Diabetic Association. The respondents were aged between 30 and 60. The researcher sought to achieve a sample in which approximately half were perceived to be overweight, and there was a balance of better off and poorer socio-economic groups as estimated by observing house construction materials. This provided a range of views that aimed to be reflective of the rural population. Additionally, five local health workers were recruited in order to triangulate findings.
The interviews and FGDs were conducted in Bengali by a qualitative, bilingual researcher from BADAS (KAk). The interviews followed a topic guide, which is a list of topics and open-ended questions that serve as a guide for the interviewer. The topic guides were developed on the basis of the aims of the research, literature reviews and COM-B theory of behaviour change. The topic guides were developed in English, translated into Bangla and piloted with two non-diabetic participants in a suburb of Dhaka and one health worker and one person with diabetes at BIRDEM (Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes Endocrine and Metabolic disorders) hospital in Dhaka. In addition to the interview schedule, mapping of the village and pile sorting (pictures described and categorised by research participants) were used in the interviews and FGDs in order to promote discussion.
Data analysis
The FGDs and interviews were recorded and transcribed from Bangla into English by professional translators. The translations were checked and parts back-translated to ensure accuracy. The data were analysed by two UCL researchers (JM and HMJ) and one from the BADAS (KAk). The software NVIVO 13 was used to assist, share and organise the analysis. Descriptive content analysis [16] was used. Transcripts were analysed thematically. The process involved the researchers who analysed the data (JM, HMJ and KAk) familiarising themselves with the data, independently listing emerging themes (patterns in the data), comparing notes and reassessing the themes and data [17]. The data and discussed themes were presented to the wider trial team (all the researchers involved in the randomised control trial) before finalising the coding structure and coding the transcripts in NVivo.
These data were subsequently organised and tabulated according to barriers (things that prevent) and enablers (things that assist) healthy behaviours that the intervention focuses on – general cross-cutting themes, care-seeking, diet, physical activity, smoking and stress. The result was a detailed list of barriers and enablers to a healthy lifestyle for each focus area, complete with quotes and context.
2. Applying theory to formative research to inform content
Selecting a theory
The COM-B model [13] was referred to in the original project proposal as the framework we would use to develop and guide evaluation of the intervention. COM-B and its corresponding ‘behaviour change wheel’ (BCW) is an integrated framework based around a ‘behaviour system’ known as COM-B: Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour [13], that explains behaviour and what needs to be addressed in order for behaviour to change. Capability is the psychological and physical capacity to engage behaviour. Motivation is defined as processes that energise and direct behaviour. Opportunity is factors outside the individual that make the behaviour possible. The model is broad as it was developed from 19 existing frameworks of behaviour change [13]. The comprehensiveness of the model has been criticised, as by synthesising such a range of approaches it means that complex theories have been simplified and it is difficult to unpack exactly what is effective [18,19]. However, given the heterogeneity of the target of our intervention (variety of ages, gender, socio-economic status and health needs) it was difficult to assume a single process or model will be applicable for all as focused behaviour-change models tend to rely on specific processes working within limited domains [19]. Furthermore, in practice intervention design frequently draws on several behaviour theories with overlapping theoretical constructs which makes it difficult to identify the exact process underlying behaviour change [20]. So, while we did look at other more specific models, we decided the broadness of COM-B made it more suitable for our context.
Corresponding to COM-B, and further elaborating it, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed [20] and thus also considered for application in our project. TDF is an integrative framework of behaviour change theory that simplifies and integrates existing theories to make them more accessible [20]. TDF was developed through consensus by a range of experts, and later refined and validated by specialists [20,21]. TDF covers 14 domains of theoretical constructs that are a useful way of understanding and classifying behaviour. Examples of the domains include knowledge, skills, social influences, beliefs about capabilities, social influences, and environmental context and resources. Additionally, specific behaviour change techniques (BCTs) have been identified to correspond with individual domains [20]. BCTs are the smallest constituents of behaviour change interventions; they are both replicable and observable [22]. Examples of BCTs include shaping knowledge, modelling behaviour, information about health consequences and goal setting. A BCT taxonomy consisting of 93 BCTs has been created through a series of consensus exercises involving over 50 behaviour change experts [20]. While the individual BCTs have been critiqued as being too simple and overly prescriptive [18], the range allows choice and it would be difficult to apply overly complex BCTs to our mHealth intervention due to the constraints of short voice messages.
As our intervention covers a broad population we needed an understandable theory that comprehensively covers behaviour, thus we utilised both COM-B and TDF frameworks. COM-B had framed much of our formative research and was easier to communicate with the wider research team. COM-B was utilised in association with TDF in helping to identify TDF components that are likely to be important in changing behaviour [20,23]. The TDF model further elaborated COM-B and was a tool suited to the practical application of a range of behaviour change techniques in our study population, and thus was used as a tool to specifically guide the messages.
Applying TDF and COM-B to formative research to inform content
A paper by French and colleagues in 2012 outlined practical steps to developing an intervention by considering theory, evidence and practice [24]. We drew on this approach when developing our intervention. Table 1 summarises French et al’s model and identifies elements we drew on. This included the need to specify the behaviour change we are targeting, identifying barriers and enablers that need to be addressed and applying appropriate BCTs. However, we tailored our approach to specifically address TDF for an mHealth intervention, meaning we added, omitted and adapted steps. For example, step 2 of French et al’s model was broken down and adapted to align with TDF, we omitted step 4 from French et al’s model and we added our own steps 1 (context of the intervention) and 6 (a table of content bringing together the earlier steps).
Table 1.
Step | Tasks (summarised) | mHealth intervention |
---|---|---|
STEP 1: Who needs to do what, differently? |
|
The specific outcomes and areas of behaviour change were identified |
STEP 2: Using a theoretical framework, which barriers and enablers need to be addressed? |
|
TDF and COM-B were selected. Barriers and enablers to behaviour change identified through qualitative formative research Barriers and enablers categorised in terms of TDF |
STEP 3: Which intervention components could overcome the barriers and enhance the enablers? |
|
BCTs identified according to specific enabler and barrier domains |
STEP 4: How can behaviour change be measured and understood? |
|
Through the process evaluation and cluster randomised controlled trial design the mechanisms of change will be evaluated. This is not directly part of the message development. |
For our intervention development we considered the outcomes needed for the mHealth intervention to be a success and we were able to identify the barriers and enablers to this through the formative research. TDF theory enabled us to systematically classify the barriers and enablers and thereby identify BCTs to address them. We were able to break down this process into six-steps as detailed in the results.
Results
Through the analysis of the qualitative research and the TDF framework, a six-step process to developing a guide for the content of behaviour-orientated voice messages was produced. The end result was a comprehensive guide for the study team as well as scriptwriters and producers of the voice messages (who come from a non-medical, non-academic or behaviour change background). Table 2 outlines the steps, with more detail provided under the corresponding sub-headings below.
Table 2.
Step | Summary of step |
---|---|
STEP 1: Context of the intervention | The formative research provides an in-depth analysis of the context of the intervention. |
STEP 2: Break down intended outcomes | Related to the formative research and the overall outcomes of the project, specific outcomes for the five areas of focus, i.e. care-seeking, diet, physical activity, smoking and stress, were identified. |
STEP 3: Identify and list the enablers and barriers to behaviour change | Enablers to promoting a healthy lifestyle and barriers to implementing a healthy lifestyle were identified from the formative research and listed. |
STEP 4: Categorise the barriers and enablers according to COM-B and the TDF | The identified enablers and barriers were categorised according to TDF and COM-B. |
STEP 5: Suggest behaviour change approaches for each enabler and barrier | In light of the appropriate transtheoretical domains, behaviour change approaches were identified for each enabler and barrier |
STEP 6: Table of message content produced based on the intended outcomes, barriers and enablers and BCTs | A table of message was produced based on the intended outcomes and assigned BCTs addressing each enabler and barrier. |
Step 1: the context of the intervention
An overview and key findings from the formative research were shared with those involved in message development. A full description is beyond the scope of this paper, instead we provide a summary of some of the key findings on context that directly influenced mHealth message development, in Table 3, with specific emphasis on themes of religion, balance, family and societal pressure and gender roles. There were aspects on which the messages were able to build on, for example the responsibility to look after oneself as a religious duty. Importantly, understanding of context was crucial to defining the behaviour the intervention aimed to influence in step 2.
Table 3.
Aspect | Description | Influence on the messages |
---|---|---|
Religion and belief | The importance of religion and a belief that everything is under the control of Allah was crucial in peoples’ understanding of their health. While many still valued medical advice, this belief could lead to people being fatalistic about their health and less motivated to change behaviour as explained by one respondent ‘Allah has given us this disease…It’s not about being rich or being poor. Who has bad luck will have diabetes no matter what they do’ (diabetic woman, FGD021). However, some people also spoke about how because Allah gave life it is one’s responsibility to look after it. Additionally during Ramadan ‘bad habits’ and ‘unhealthy’ behaviour (such as smoking) reduced. | Emphasis on responsibility to look after ones’ health. Additional messages were created to correspond with the month of Ramadan and how diet should be approached |
Balance | Routines, balance and moderation were perceived as key to achieving health; eating regularly and reasonable portion sizes, getting enough rest and work are examples of balance. One respondent explained ‘Maintaining three proper meals every day is enough to keep us healthy. Regular eating, bathing, and proper lifestyle – that is enough’ (diabetic man, FGD023). | This was built on – the need for regular and reasonable sized meals was emphasised |
Family and social pressure | Whether family members valued and supported each other affected an individual’s access to treatment and their welfare; for example women often rely on their husband to take them to the doctor, and the family diet depends on what the mother has prepared. Social norms are important factors in affecting one’s behaviour. For example, hospitality is very important with people expected to serve and consume different foods during visits and on special occasions, as explained by a respondent ‘In a social ritual…or in a gathering, if I refuse the dishes offered to me it would not be polite.’ (diabetic woman SSI008). | Messages targeted the whole family. Specific examples in social situations were drawn on/highlighted |
Gender | Social norms are highly gendered as women are expected to behave in a certain way and are judged accordingly. Seclusion prevents some women from going outside of the home making it difficult for them to walk or be physically active. One health worker explains ‘walking is hardly possible for most of the women in the village for some reasons. Where should they walk?’(health worker SSI020). Additionally there are strict gender roles within society and families – for example men do most of the food shopping and women prepare and cook. | Messages were tailored to men and women, they also highlighted the importance of women being able to engage in ‘healthy’ behaviour. |
Step 2: breakdown of outcomes
When planning an intervention it is important to identify changes the intervention should have (i.e. outcomes). The overall primary outcome of the trial was the reduction in the prevalence of intermediate hyperglycaemia and T2DM and a decrease in the two-year cumulative incidence of T2DM among individuals with intermediate hyperglycaemia [12]. Secondary and explanatory trial outcomes include a range of outcomes related to risk factors, awareness and control of diabetes.
We developed a comprehensive list of intended intermediate outcomes for the intervention focused on behaviour and awareness, and related to each of our focus areas (Figure 1). The intermediate outcomes are behaviours that need to change in order to achieve the trial outcomes, and are directly relevant to the context of the intervention and emerged from the formative research as well as the secondary trial outcomes (reported in full elsewhere [12]). Having a clear understanding of the intended consequences of the intervention helped focus the messages of the intervention as well as identify the barriers and enablers to achieving them.
Steps 3: identifying and listing enablers and barriers to behaviour change
As explained in the methods section, the analysis of the formative research included a detailed breakdown of the barriers and enablers according to areas of focus. This list of barriers and enablers provided the basis of the message content, and enabled targeting of behaviour change specific to the context and grounded in theory. Table 4 provides examples of barriers and enablers from each focus area.
Table 4.
Enablers | Barriers |
---|---|
General | |
Allah gave you life it’s your responsibility to keep it healthy | Fate determines diabetes/health status |
Care-seeking | |
Diabetics tend to go for check-ups/testing if they feel unwell | Lack of consistency in taking medicines: patients may decide themselves that they feel better and stop taking medication |
Diet | |
Family support and encouragement to change eating habits i.e. all eating ruti in the evenings, mother cooking ‘healthy’ foods, daughter encourages grandmother to eat with less salt etc. | Family not changing or supporting different eating habits i.e. husband demanding food is cooked with more oil, wife not changing cooking practices |
Physical activity | |
Can integrate walking into routine (walking children to school, going to the shops, walking to work etc.) | Social acceptability: Not always socially acceptable for women to be walking outside and judgements made |
Smoking | |
Knowledge: greater public awareness of health and smoking i.e. warnings of cigarette packages and doctor’s advice | Knowledge: overall general unawareness about the harmfulness of smoking to health No awareness regarding smoking and the link to diabetes |
Stress | |
Some coping mechanisms identified: talking to someone, music, religious rituals etc. | ‘Unhealthy’ coping mechanisms: smoking, taking too many or unnecessary pills |
aThere are some empty cells in this tables. This is because where possible we match barriers to enablers. If there is not a matching enabler or barrier we leave the corresponding cell blank.
Steps 4 and 5: dividing the enablers and barriers according to TDF and COM-B and suggesting behaviour change techniques for the messages
For each enabler and barrier a COM-B characteristic and transtheoretical domain was identified. Identifying underlying domains enabled a better understanding of the behaviour and appropriate BCTs associated with the domains could be identified. Drawing on the BCT taxonomy compiled by the same group who developed TDF [22], BCTs were selected for each enabler and barrier. BCTs that could be selected were limited due to the nature of voice messages. Identified BCTs included: modelling (demonstrating) behaviour, shaping knowledge, information about consequences, repetition and substitution, social support (encouraging), pros and cons and goal setting. Table 5 provides examples of TDF and BCTs for a selection of barriers and enablers (the complete table of TDF and BCTs identified for each barrier and enabler are shown in Table 6). The completed table enabled us to align messages with each barrier and enabler, and ensure that they were all addressed.
Table 5.
TDF Domain/ COM-B |
Enabler | Barrier | Behaviour Change Technique |
---|---|---|---|
TDF: 1. Knowledge COM-B: Capability |
Greater public awareness of the link between smoking and ill health | Overall lack of awareness regarding the link between smoking and ill health, particularly diabetes and smoking | Shaping knowledge Information about consequences |
TDF: 2. Skills COM-B: Capability |
Some coping mechanisms identified: talking to someone, music, religious rituals etc. | Lack of control and coping mechanisms | Shaping knowledge: identify stress, look for coping strategies Modelling behaviour |
TDF: 6. Beliefs about consequences COM-B: Motivation |
Religious beliefs and responsibility | Religious beliefs and fate | Information about consequences Shaping knowledge: personal responsibility and reinforcing the enabler |
TDF: 11. Environmental context and resources COM-B: Opportunity |
Walking with other people | Women feel unsafe walking alone | Modelling behaviour: examples of people walking together |
TDF: 12. Social influences COM-B: Motivation |
Family supporting different/healthy eating habits | Cooking: women cooking with high levels of oil etc., men asking for it | Modelling behaviour Shaping knowledge |
Table 6.
General | |||
---|---|---|---|
TDF domain/ COM-B |
Enabler | Barriers | Behaviour change technique |
TDF: 1. Knowledge COM-B: Capability |
People have some knowledge about diabetes and its management | Lack of in-depth knowledge about the causes of diabetes | Shaping knowledge: build on enablers |
Some knowledge that sedentary lifestyle causes diabetes | Shaping knowledge | ||
Some knowledge about hereditary nature of high blood pressure and connection between high BP and diabetes | Belief that diabetes is contagious | Shaping knowledge: challenge incorrect beliefs | |
Lack of knowledge about how to prevent diabetes | Shaping knowledge | ||
TDF: 4. Beliefs about capabilities COM-B: Motivation |
Beliefs: too many pills can make one unwell, older people put on weight, complications other than diabetes blamed for making one feel unwell | Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences |
|
Feelings of lack of control over body weight, health and diabetes | Modelling behaviour Goal setting Information about health consequences |
||
Difficulties to convince pre-diabetics to change | Modelling behaviour Goal setting |
||
TDF: 6. Beliefs about consequences COM-B: Motivation |
Religious beliefs and responsibility | Religious beliefs and fate | Information about health consequences Shaping knowledge |
Bad habits stopped during Ramadan | Modelling behaviour: encourage this to continue | ||
Routine, balance and moderation = healthy lifestyle | Modelling behaviour | ||
People not taking responsibility for their health | Information about health consequences | ||
TDF: 10. Memory, attention and decision making COM-B: Capability |
Difficulties to maintain a routine | Modelling behaviour Social support (encourage) |
|
People identified as being ‘careless’ | Modelling behaviour, Social support (encourage) |
||
Perception that if you are addicted there is nothing that can be done (smoking, sugar etc.) | Modelling behaviour | ||
TDF: 11. Environmental context and resources COM-B: Opportunity |
Lifestyle changes are not too complicated and within peoples’ reach | Poverty makes it difficult to maintain a moderate, regular lifestyle | Modelling behaviour |
Poverty and time constraints make it difficult to manage/control diabetes | Modelling behaviour | ||
Increase in stress = increased BP and poor health | Social support (encourage) | ||
TDF: 12. Social influences COM-B: Opportunity |
‘Slim’ perceived as being healthy | Fat looking good | Shaping knowledge: challenge perception |
Diabetes thought to damage appearance | Shaping knowledge | ||
Advice and criticism from friends | Criticism from friends | Social support (encourage) | |
Family support for management of diabetes | Social support (encourage) Modelling behaviour |
||
TDF: 13. Emotion COM-B: Motivation |
Good explanations of diabetes can reduce fear | Diabetes and complications cause fear | Shaping knowledge |
Care Seeking | |||
---|---|---|---|
TDF Domain/ COM-B |
Enabler | Barrier | Behaviour Change Technique |
TDF: 1. Knowledge COM-B: Capability |
Doctors offering advice on lifestyle improvement factors | Lack of awareness on how to prevent diabetes | Shaping knowledge |
TDF: 3. Social/Professional Role and Identity COM-B: Motivation |
Women and poor people go for regular check-ups | Better-off don’t think check-ups are so important | Shaping knowledge: everyone needs to go to the doctor Modelling behaviour |
TDF: 4. Beliefs about capabilities COM-B: Motivation |
Belief in fate and a lack of control to seek care | Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences Modelling behaviour |
|
Testing own blood sugar is empowering and motivates a person to control their diabetes | Pros and cons Shaping knowledge |
||
Taking medicinal plants makes someone feel in control of their diabetes | Medicinal plants unregulated and could be safety concerns | Pros and cons Shaping knowledge |
|
TDF: 6. Beliefs about consequences COM-B: Motivation |
Diabetics will go for check-ups if they feel unwell | Not taking medicines because they are not improving or because they improve feel they no longer need to take them | Modelling behaviour Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences |
Waiting until diabetes is ‘bad’ or suffering from complications before seeking care | Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences |
||
Belief that medication is enough to treat diabetes, without lifestyle changes | Shaping knowledge Modelling behaviour |
||
TDF: 10. Memory, attention and decision process COM-B: Capability |
Forgetting to take medication, particularly when not in a routine | Habit formation: suggest a reminder Imaginary reward |
|
Descriptions of being too ‘lazy’ and ‘careless’ to take medicine | Habit formation Shaping knowledge |
||
Diabetes book (provided by healthcare providers) difficult to understand | Shaping knowledge: providing straight forward information | ||
TDF: 11. Environmental context and resources COM-B: Opportunity |
Some people request local pharmacy to carry medicine | Strips, insulin etc. not always available locally | Modelling behaviour |
Examples of high quality of care | Low quality of care, chaotic treatment; having to wait/crowds | Modelling behaviour: Acknowledge difficulties and suggest ways of overcoming |
|
Dr’s consulting specialists by phone, specialists visiting villages once a month | Lack of training and resources to treat diabetes locally | Modelling behaviour: Pros and cons |
|
Free services will motivate people to seek care | Costs: travel, tests, check-ups, medicine | Shaping knowledge: importance of check-ups Pros and cons |
|
Doctors prescribing locally | Shaping knowledge | ||
Local services can’t confirm a diagnosis of diabetes – will refer to specialists/Faridpur | Modelling behaviour: Pros and cons |
||
Herbs taken due to costs of medicines | Shaping knowledge Pros and cons |
||
Business/lack of time to take medicine and visit facilities: particularly for women | Modelling behaviour: examples of balancing and prioritising Pros and cons |
||
TDF: 12. Social influences COM-B: Opportunity |
Family support: taking to health facilities, arranging appointments, encouraging to seek care | Lack of family support: women rely on husbands to get strips and to take them to the doctor | Modelling behaviour: examples of how can support family |
Women not feeling comfortable talking about health/sensitive issues | Modelling behaviour | ||
TDF: 13. Emotion COM-B: Motivation |
People reporting understanding a doctors’ advice | Fear of doctors | Shaping knowledge |
Trust, rapport with a doctor | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
||
Fear of dying can mean people take advice seriously | Shaping knowledge | ||
Fear after diagnosis prevents patients coming back for care/check-ups | Shaping knowledge: stress diabetes is manageable if controlled |
||
Feeling out of control | Shaping knowledge: | ||
TDF: 14. Behavioural regulation COM-B: Capability |
If treatment is planned in stages patients more likely to return and not feel overwhelmed | Modelling behaviour Goal setting: encourage people to have targets |
Diet | |||
---|---|---|---|
TDF Domain/ COM-B |
Enabler | Barrier | Behaviour Change Technique |
TDF: 1. Knowledge COM-B: Capability |
Basic knowledge about a diabetic diet | Lack of in-depth knowledge/knowledge on portions | Shaping knowledge |
Basic knowledge about ‘good’/’bad’ food | Lack of in-depth knowledge, confusion, incorrect knowledge | Shaping knowledge | |
Desire for more knowledge | Shaping knowledge | ||
Dr’s advice valued and people report trying to follow it | |||
Lack of knowledge about diet and prevention of diabetes | Shaping knowledge | ||
General lack of understanding about the seriousness of diabetes | Shaping knowledge | ||
TDF: 2. Skills COM-B: Capability |
Growing vegetables/home gardens | Modelling behaviour | |
TDF: 4. Beliefs about capabilities COM-B: Motivation |
Lack of control: belief will put on weight despite what one eats, concept of ‘body letting me down’ | Shaping knowledge | |
TDF: 6. Beliefs about consequences COM-B: Motivation |
Allah gave life and our responsibility to look after it | Religious beliefs and fate – changing eating habits will not help | Information about health consequences Shaping knowledge |
‘Home-cooked’ food believed to be healthy and ‘outside’ food unhealthy | Shaping knowledge: building on existing knowledge | ||
Balance in food considered to be good | Shaping knowledge | ||
Diagnosis of diabetes encouraging to change eating habits | Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences | ||
Border-line/people at risk of diabetes will try to follow doctor’s advice | Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences: building on existing motivation |
||
Feeling better after changing diet/medication means diabetics may revert to old habits as believe they are ‘better’ | Shaping knowledge Modelling behaviour |
||
Belief that non-diabetics can eat whatever they like | Shaping knowledge | ||
TDF: 8. Intentions COM-B: Motivation |
Personal motivation to eat well and refuse certain foods | Modelling behaviour | |
Good practices: making snacks with reduced sugar, replacement sugars in tea, ‘raw tea’ drinking | Modelling behaviour | ||
TDF: 10. Memory, attention and decision process COM-B: Capability |
Good practice: developing the habit of eating with less salt and sugar | Modelling behaviour | |
Habit of snacking inside and outside the home | Shaping knowledge | ||
TDF: 11. Environmental context and resources COM-B: Opportunity |
Cost of food: daal and vegetables reasonable price | Cost of food: ruti, eggs, meat, fruit more expensive | Shaping knowledge Modelling behaviour |
Education: means people are more likely to follow ‘rules an regulations’ | Lack of education | Shaping knowledge | |
Booklet provided by some care providers explaining what food and portions diabetics should eat found useful | Lack of availability of this booklet and other resources | Shaping knowledge: increase awareness of available resources |
|
Underweight and malnourishment a problem | Shaping knowledge: giving practical advice that considers a range of people |
||
Lack of time to eat regularly | Modelling behaviour | ||
Lack of time to cater to everyone’s nutritional needs | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
||
Availability of ‘unhealthy’ food inside and outside the home | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
||
Convenience of eating outside the home | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
||
Fertilisers, chemicals etc. used to grow food | Shaping knowledge Pros and cons |
||
TDF: 12. Social influences COM-B: Opportunity |
Body image: Being ‘slim’ perceived as healthy (not too thin, not too fat) |
Body image: being ‘heavier’ perceived as healthy and beautiful | Shaping knowledge: changing/reinforcing perceptions |
Body image: extra fat meaning there are more diseases, can cause difficulties | Shaping knowledge | ||
Cooking: women may cook with lower levels of oil etc. | Cooking: women cooking with high levels of oil etc. as men (husbands, fathers, in-laws etc.) are asking for it | Modelling behaviour Shaping knowledge: whole family affected by cooking |
|
Family supporting different/healthy eating habits | Family not supporting different/healthy eating habits | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
|
Shopping: men shop, women can intervene | Modelling behaviour | ||
Good practices: family and friends bringing/serving alternatives to sweets/snacks | Hospitality: expected to eat and serve foods during social occasions and visits | Modelling behaviour | |
Social gatherings and meeting in tea shops | Modelling behaviour | ||
Status and food: eating meat, ghee etc. can be associated with being a higher social status | Shaping knowledge Pros and cons |
||
TDF: 13. Emotion COM-B: Motivation |
Feeling unwell when eating unhealthy food | Feeling unwell, hungry, having gas etc. when having smaller portions/healthy food | Shaping knowledge: stress long-term benefits |
Diabetics feeling better when eating healthy food | Shaping knowledge Modelling behaviour |
||
Eating less and better during Ramadan | Shaping knowledge Goals setting: suggest continuing some of the behaviour after Ramadan |
||
Taste and enjoyment of certain foods that are unhealthy | Information about health consequences Pros and cons Shaping knowledge: promoting moderation Modelling behaviour: cooking tasty, healthy food |
||
Lack of concern for health and living for ‘now’ | Information about health consequences Pros and cons Shaping knowledge: |
||
Importance of rice: complete meal, nourishment etc. | Information about health consequences Pros and cons Shaping knowledge |
Physical Activity | |||
---|---|---|---|
TDF Domain/ COM-B |
Enablers | Barrier | Behaviour Change Technique |
TDF: 1. Knowledge COM-B: Capability |
Some knowledge exercise is good for diabetics | Not a detailed knowledge of the relationship between exercise and diabetes | Shaping knowledge |
Some awareness exercise is related to body weight | Shaping knowledge | ||
Doctors advice that walking helps the body to create its own insulin | Shaping knowledge: reinforce/build on this knowledge | ||
Diabetics understand/take doctors’ advice | Shaping knowledge Modelling behaviour |
||
Lack of knowledge that exercise can help prevent diabetes | Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences |
||
TDF: 2. Skills COM-B: Capability |
Men: Swim, do push-ups, walk, some sports Women: walk, stretch, occasionally swim |
Shaping knowledge Modelling behaviour |
|
TDF: 3. Professional role and identity COM-B: Motivation |
People who exercise seen as educated | Modelling behaviour: exercise is for everyone | |
Exercise is seen as a sign of having diabetes/done by ‘fat’ people | Shaping knowledge Modelling behaviour |
||
TDF: 4. Beliefs about capabilities COM-B: Motivation |
Having diabetes makes people feel unwell, therefore difficult to do exercise | Shaping knowledge: exercise makes people feel better in the long-term Goal setting |
|
TDF: 6. Beliefs about consequences COM-B: Motivation |
Unsure/unconvinced about the benefits of exercise: | Shaping knowledge | |
Belief hard work is enough to keep healthy, there is no need to do other exercise | Shaping knowledge | ||
TDF: 10. Memory, attention and decision making processes COM-B: Capability |
No habit of walking (availability of cheap transport) | Goal setting Repetition and substitution: habit formation |
|
TDF: 11. Environmental context and resources COM-B: Opportunity |
Able to integrate walking into everyday routine | Lack of time to exercise/walk | Shaping knowledge: Modelling behaviour |
Walking with other people | Women feel unsafe walking alone | Modelling behaviour: | |
Rural areas do have more open spaces than urban areas | Lack of space/places to exercise | Shaping knowledge: types of exercise that are possible | |
Weather/muddy roads make it difficult to walk | Pros and cons | ||
Other people do household works (women, servants, younger people), therefore others are less active | Shaping knowledge | ||
TDF: 12. Social influences COM-B: Opportunity |
Friends recommending to walk to manage diabetes | Modelling behaviour | |
Walking with friends feels good, encourages walking | Modelling behaviour | ||
Not walking viewed as ‘lazy’ | Modelling behaviour (Need to be careful not to stigmatise people) |
||
Social acceptability: sports not seen as socially acceptable for older people or women | Shaping knowledge: importance of exercise and challenge perceptions Social support: encourage support |
||
Women feel judged/shamed if walking around outside (especially if they get muddy etc.) | Social support Pros and cons |
||
Exercise viewed as not a normal thing to do | Social support Pros and cons |
||
Exercise viewed as only for those in the city who have no manual labour | Social support Pros and cons |
||
TDF: 13. Emotion COM-B: Motivation |
Feeling better/good after manual work/exercise | Shaping knowledge Information about consequences |
|
Fear of getting injured when playing ha dudu; risk of getting cold after swimming | Pros and cons |
Smoking | |||
---|---|---|---|
TDF Domain/COM-B | Enablers | Barrier | Behaviour Change Technique |
TDF: 1. Knowledge COM-B: Capability |
Greater public awareness of the link between smoking and ill health | Overall lack of awareness regarding the link between smoking and ill health. No awareness of the link between smoking and diabetes |
Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences |
Dr’s advise to give up smoking | Shaping knowledge: reinforce doctor’s advice | ||
TDF: 4. Beliefs about capabilities COM-B: Capability |
Belief that can only give up by quitting completely | Shaping knowledge: about how to reduce gradually Goal setting |
|
TDF: 6. Beliefs about consequences COM-B: Motivation |
People quit due to physical health problems | People wait to quit until they have physical health problems | Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences |
TDF: 8. Intentions COM-B: Motivation |
Personal motivation to stop smoking | People still smoke despite doctor’s advise | Pros and cons Information about health consequences |
TDF: 10. Memory, attention and decision process COM-B: Capability |
Addiction to smoking | Goal setting Pros and cons |
|
TDF: 11. Environmental context and resources COM-B: Opportunity TDF: 12. Social influences COM-B: Motivation |
Economic costs discourages from smoking | People smoke to suppress hunger | Pros and cons |
Stigma: generally not accepted for women to smoke | Very normal for men to smoke | Shaping knowledge Social support |
|
Stigma: when smoking in front of elders, women etc. | Shaping knowledge: information on the effects of passive smoking | ||
Not acceptable to smoke in public spaces (bus, mosques etc) | Shaping knowledge Information about health consequences |
||
Family: less likely to smoke if it is not done in the family | Modelling behaviour | ||
Family: discouraging smoking/encouraging to give up | Modelling behaviour Social support (encouraging) |
||
Religion discouraging smoking, people giving up for religious reasons | Modelling behaviour: build on this motivation | ||
Quitting smoking because of work | Shaping knowledge: reasons to quit Pros and cons |
||
Less likely to smoke with age | Shaping knowledge: | ||
Smoking perceived to be common among certain groups: farmers, younger people, people in rural areas, people in university | Shaping knowledge: on the extent of problem Social support: encouraging people to quit Modelling behaviour |
||
Introduction at a young age to smoking by others | Modelling behaviour: example of someone introduced to smoking and later regretting it Information about health consequences |
||
Peer pressure to smoke | Modelling behaviour: examples of peer pressure | ||
Smoking is a social activity | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
||
Incentives to smoke: as part of a political campaign | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
||
Men and women also take other tobacco products | Shaping knowledge: information about other tobacco products | ||
TDF: 13. Emotion COM-B: Motivation |
Pleasure and comfort of smoking | Pros and cons: acknowledge comforts of smoking, but also the negatives | |
Smoking relieves stress | Pros and cons Modelling behaviour: alternative ways to deal with stress |
Stress | |||
---|---|---|---|
TDF Domain/ COM-B |
Enablers | Barrier | Behaviour Change Technique |
TDF: 1. Knowledge COM-B: Capability |
Some knowledge that stress can make diabetes worse | Most people did not link stress and diabetes | Shaping knowledge: the link between diabetes and stress |
Some understanding that stress affects health | Shaping knowledge | ||
TDF: 2. Skills COM-B: Capability |
Some coping mechanisms identified: talking to someone, music, religious rituals etc. (See more below) |
Modelling behaviour | |
TDF: 4. Beliefs about capabilities COM-B: Motivation |
Lack of control and coping mechanisms | Shaping knowledge: identify stress, look for coping strategies, acknowledge some things are not within the individuals’ control Modelling behaviour |
|
TDF: 10. Memory, attention and decision making process TDF: Capability |
Coping mechanisms: music, watching TV, reading | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons: of different coping mechanisms, stress finding the right ones |
|
Coping mechanisms: distraction, focusing on other things | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
||
‘Unhealthy’ coping mechanisms: smoking, taking pills | Pros and cons | ||
TDF: 11. Environmental context and resources COM-B: Opportunity |
Identified sources of pleasure: money, security, health | Identified sources of stress: money, poverty, land | Shaping knowledge |
Health professionals able to treat the symptoms of stress: hypertension, headaches etc. | Not dealing with the root causes of stress | Shaping knowledge Pros and cons |
|
TDF: 12. Social influences COM-B: Opportunity |
Sources of pleasure: family, socialising | Sources of tension: family, responsibilities, early marriage, conflict in family | Shaping knowledge |
Coping mechanisms: talking to others | Others will know their problems if they talk about them | Social support (encourage) Modelling behaviour |
|
People of the village come together to help those in need e.g. if sick | Social support (encourage) Modelling behaviour |
||
TDF: 13. Emotions COM-B: Motivation |
Coping mechanisms: music, praying, rituals, being alone, resting | Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
|
Symptoms of stress: poor health, headaches etc. | Shaping knowledge |
Additional notes
In the working table of content for script writers there was an additional column entitled ‘message number’ – this way we were able to add the message numbers that addressed the individual barriers and enablers – allowing us to track the messages and ensure all the barriers and enablers were addressed.
In the final column of this table ‘behaviour change technique’ some additional information explaining how the BCT can be approached is occasionally added – again there was more information in the original table.
The BCT ‘modelling behaviour’ refers to ‘demonstration of the behaviour’ in the BCT taxonomy.
Step 6: producing table of message content based on the intended outcomes, barriers and enablers and BCTs
In order to guide the scriptwriters as to the content of the voice messages we created a table with the guidelines for the content of individual messages. The details in the table include the TDF, BCT, barriers/enablers, the content, audience and suggested format. Each message was based around a specific enabler and/or barrier. The content addresses the barrier and/or enablers through one of the BCTs suggested.
An example of one of the messages is in Table 7. This message addresses the barrier that people are often expected to eat sweets and rich food during social occasions. The BCT is modelling behaviour: hence a drama with a scenario of someone going to a wedding and the techniques someone uses to eat smaller portions and less sweet food is described. The scenario was informed by the outcomes (smaller portions, less sugar, less oil etc.) and the context (the types of food and events extracted from the data). Doctors working with diabetic patients in Bangladesh checked all the messages to ensure they are in-line with current medical advice and standards. More examples from the table can be found in Table 8.
Table 7.
Area | TDF | BCT | Barriers | Enablers | Content | Audience | Format |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diet | Social influences | Modelling behaviour | Hospitality: being expected to eat sweets/rich food at social occasions such as weddings | Scenario: A person newly diagnosed with diabetes goes to a wedding and tries to resist large amounts of biryani and sweets. Friends pressure him to eat them. | Men and women Diabetic |
Drama | |
Strategies used by the person with diabetes: - Requests a smaller portion and does not have any sweets - Explains to his friends why he needs to be careful and control his diabetes |
|||||||
Other messages: - Everyone needs to be careful about what they eat - It is important to be supportive of people and allow them to have smaller portions/have alternatives to rich and sweet food |
Table 8.
Message no |
Focus area | Aspect | Communication objective (BCT) | Barrier | Enabler/motivator | Content/key message | Audience | Format | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
48 | General | Memory, attention and decision making Environment |
Modelling behaviour | Difficulties in maintaining a routine Poverty makes it difficult to maintain a moderate, regular lifestyle |
Routine, balance and moderation = healthy lifestyle Lifestyle changes are not too complicated and within peoples’ reach |
Scenario: conversation between someone who is drinking lal cha with no sugar and a friend/relative about healthy lifestyles. | Men and women Non-diabetic |
Drama/conversation | Could have a woman and/or an older person | |
Friend | Response | |||||||||
Why are you drinking lal cha and no sugar? | I try not to have too much sugar. I also try to eat regularly and not too much. If I do have sweets just have a little bit. I don’t have oily food at home, but on certain occasions when I have pilou I will just have a little bit. | |||||||||
So you try to keep to a routine? | When I can. I walk in the morning, eat regularly and have a balance of different types of food. I don’t smoke or eat many snacks. | |||||||||
Is it hard to have this lifestyle? | No, you just have to be careful. When you start it is possible to continue. It is good for all the family, we all eat a moderate, balanced diet and I walk with my sister. | |||||||||
When you are working can you do this? | Yes. I just plan things around my work. Everyone rich and poor needs to think about how they can have a healthy lifestyle and plan accordingly. | |||||||||
And do you keep healthy? | Yes the doctor said I am very well, and I feel healthy. My blood pressure is good and I don’t have diabetes. | |||||||||
Oh I have high sugar, or pre-diabetes, can I still do this? | Yes of course! See your doctor, but eating well and exercising regularly is important way of managing your health | |||||||||
Key messages: - Strive for a moderate lifestyle; regular exercise and eating reasonable amounts, having small amounts of ‘unhealthy’ food - lifestyle changes are within people’s reach: rich and poor, male and female. - They help keep you healthy and manage illness | ||||||||||
68 | General (Diet, smoking) |
Beliefs about consequences Environment, context and resources Social influences |
Shaping knowledge | Religious beliefs and fate Poverty makes it difficult to maintain a moderate, regular lifestyle |
Religious beliefs and responsibility Routine, balance and moderation = healthy lifestyle Lifestyle changes are not too complicated and within peoples’ reach Balance in food considered to be good Religion discouraging smoking |
Doctor and an imam: - A balanced, regular lifestyle is healthy for diabetics and non-diabetics - Try to eat a balanced diet in moderation - Exercise everyday - Try to avoid bad habits like smoking and smokeless tobacco products - Draw on support from your families and communities - These changes are possible for everyone, rich or poor - Islam teaches we need to look after our bodies and health - We can change ourselves, our families and communities |
Men and women Diabetic and non-diabetic |
Straight information | Motivational message to encourage a moderate, healthy lifestyle | |
49 | Care seeking | Beliefs about consequences | Health consequences Shaping knowledge: complications of diabetes |
Wait until diabetes is bad before seeking care | The story of a diabetic: I suffered from some of the complications of diabetes. I went to the doctor due to having problems with my feet being red, warm, swollen and with cracks. The doctor helped treat my feet but also sent me for a blood test. I found I had diabetes. The doctor helped me to understand I can control my diabetes with medicine, diet and later exercise. If diabetes is left untreated like mine you can get many complications. Such as: foot problems, problems with eyesight, nerve damage and kidney damage. These are all very serious. The good news is that diabetes can be managed and prevented. It is better to seek help and make lifestyle changes before you get very sick Key points: If you delay seeking care and have diabetes you can get complications The complications of diabetes Diabetes can be prevented and managed |
Men and women Diabetic |
Personal story/account | A personal story or account about diabetes might motivate people to seek care and try to prevent diabetes It would be good if at least one of message 49 and 50 could be a female |
||
72 | Care seeking | Behavioural regulation | Goal setting | If treatment is planned in stages patients more likely to return and not feel overwhelmed | If you have diabetes it is sometimes easier to plan your treatment/behaviour change in stages. Talk to your doctor about this. - Example of planned behaviour could be: - Planned behaviour: - At the beginning: - Take medicine as advised - Exercise when can - Slowly reduce portions, fat and sugar - After a couple of weeks: - Walk everyday - Weigh self regularly - Talk to family about diet and cooking - Take medication - After one month: - Walking half an hour everyday - Family changing eating habits - Reduced fat, sugar and portion sizes - Taking medication regularly - Continue going for testing |
Diabetic Men and women |
Pros and cons | Check with medics if this is feasible We could also say that anyone can plan to change their behaviour |
||
51 | Exercise | Professional role and identity Emotion, Skills |
Shaping knowledge Health consequences |
Lack of knowledge that exercise can help prevent diabetes Able to integrate walking into everyday routine People who exercise seen as educated Not walking seen as ‘lazy’ Too cold to swim |
Lack of time to exercise/walk People who exercise seen as educated Not walking seen as ‘lazy’ Men: Swim, do push-ups, walk, some sports in the past Women: walk, stretch, swim |
Exercise is very important. Exercise will make your heart beat faster and increase blood flow and oxygen to your muscles and organs. It can help to prevent diabetes, control your weight, as well as decrease the risk of heart problems and blood pressure and is good for your general well being. It also helps to control diabetes. Exercise stimulates brain chemicals and can make you feel happier. Exercise is for not just for the educated and affluent. It should be done whether you have diabetes or not, are rich or poor, old or young, man or woman. Everyone should aim to do half an hour exercise a day. It is important to make exercise a priority and try to do some everyday. Everyone can find a type of exercise they like or can do. There are many types of exercise. Exercises include: walking, running, sports, swimming, riding bicycle etc. If it is too cold to swim, walk. You can try different types of exercises too. Make time to exercise – try to walk places instead of getting transport, instead of watching TV do some exercise! |
Men and women Diabetic and non-diabetic |
Dr: Straight information | ||
52 | Exercise | Environment, Social influences, Memory/attention, Emotions |
Modelling behaviour Social support |
Women feel judged/shamed walking outside Women feel unsafe walking alone Lack of time to exercise/walk Exercise viewed as not a normal thing to do |
Walking with other people Walking with friends feels good Able to integrate walking into everyday routine |
Scenario Two females walking together – they talk to another female neighbour and try to encourage her to join them. |
Women Non-diabetic |
Drama | Keep as females: it would be good if we can try and encourage females to encourage each other | |
Question | Response | |||||||||
Where are you walking? | We are walking for health reasons. We also enjoy walking together. | |||||||||
Do you have diabetes? | No. It is always good to walk. Walking can prevent diabetes. | |||||||||
As a woman doesn’t it look bad? Do you feel safe? | Women need to walk too. By walking together we feel safer. If women all walk then we will change how people think about women walking. We see exercise as a normal thing to do. | |||||||||
Do you have time to walk? | We walk every morning as part of our routine. We also think of when we can walk – sometimes we walk instead of getting transport. | |||||||||
Is it not tiring? | At first it was hard, but now we enjoy it and you feel better in the long-term. It is also fun to walk together | |||||||||
Final message – try to encourage other women to walk, that way everyone will benefit and we can change public responses. Exercise will then be seen as normal. | ||||||||||
57 | Stress | Environment, context Memory, attention and decision making |
Pros and cons | Not dealing with the root causes of stress Coping mechanisms: smoking, taking pills |
In the last message we spoke about ways people deal with stress. Now we are going to talk about the pros and cons (good and bad points) about each. Some people when they are stressed will take sleeping pills, smoke and take pain killers. Pros/why you do it: The reasons people do this are: - will help them sleep sometimes and take away pain - gives some relief in the short term Cons/why you maybe shouldn’t rely on this: - These might help in the short term but won’t help in the long-term - Smoking is very bad for your health - Taking too many pills can be harmful (Pros outweigh pros) The other coping mechanisms: talking to others, exercising, looking at the bigger picture, exercise and some religious rituals. Cons/reasons people don’t it: - Might be harder to do in the short term - May not think of it/may not be obvious Pros/reasons to do them: - Better long-term solutions that you can do - Exercising is good for your physical health - Talking to people you trust can help relations and give long-term support (Pros outweigh cons) |
Men and women Diabetic and non-diabetic |
Straight information | Could be a doctor | ||
58 | Stress | Social influences | Modelling behaviour Social support |
Others will know their problems if they talk about them | Coping mechanisms: talking to others People of the village come together to help those in need e.g. if sick |
Scenario: female very distressed because her son is sick and she has money problems. She has a discussion with her neighbours who are very supportive and offer support, encouraging her to talk to them and they offer practical support. - Key messages: - support one another - sometimes just listening helps - talk to people you trust |
Men and women Diabetic and non-diabetic |
Drama | ||
60 | Diet | Environmental context and resources Memory, attention and decision Social influences Beliefs about consequences |
Modelling behaviour Pros and cons |
Availability of ‘unhealthy’ food inside and outside the home Convenience of eating outside the home Habit of snacking inside and outside the home Social gatherings and meeting in tea shops |
‘Home-cooked’ food believed to be healthy and ‘outside’ food unhealthy | Scenario: two men outside of the home and one wants to go for snacks and sweet tea, the other wants to go home and have food at home. They discuss the pros and cons of eating outside the home and | Men Non-diabetic |
Drama | ||
1st man: pros of eating outside | 2nd man: response, cons | |||||||||
There is so much food outside, it is very convenient | Yes that is true, but a lot of it is also fried and unhealthy. At home we can decide better what to eat. | |||||||||
The fried food such as shingaras, puris etc. are so tasty | Yes that is true. But too many are unhealthy. We can try to only go there occasionally. | |||||||||
But I am in the habit of going to the tea shop and it is very sociable, we see are friends there. | Ok, lets go and just get some lal cha without sugar. We can still see our friends. Later we can eat at home. | |||||||||
But at home there is also unhealthy food! | This is true! But we can decide better what we eat. Let’s go to my house and we can have some fruit and lal cha and then later we can have some dinner. | |||||||||
Key messages: - moderate the amount of time you eat outside the home - you can go out and eat less fried food - at home you have more control over what you eat | ||||||||||
61 | Diet | Social influences | Shaping knowledge Social support |
Cooking: women may cook with lower levels of oil etc. Family not supporting different/healthy eating habits |
Cooking: women cooking with high levels of oil etc., men asking for it Family supporting different/healthy eating habits Shopping: men shop, women can intervene |
Straight information: Families usually eat together. Everyone in the family has a role in eating well and changing eating habits. They include: | Men and women Non-diabetic and diabetic |
Straight information | Could be a song, poem, or different voices from a family or a doctor | |
Men | Men/husbands usually shop. Talk to your wife about what you will buy. Try to buy lots of vegetables and fruit. Get vegetable oil instead of ghee. Get cheaper more healthy sources of protein such as fish, eggs and chicken instead of meat. If possible get brown rice and flour. | |||||||||
Women | Women/wives/daughter in-laws do most of the cooking. Talk to your husband about what they should buy. Try to cook with lots of vegetables and make salads. Only cook with as much oil as you need. Avoid deep frying food. Explain to your family why you are cooking like this. Food can still be tasty with lots of flavour. | |||||||||
Older: in-laws | You have lots of influence. Encourage members of the family to shop and cook well. Praise healthy food and cooking. | |||||||||
Younger: children | You can encourage your parents to shop and cook well. Explain to them why it is important. | |||||||||
Key messages:All the family need to be involved in changing eating practices - Good cooking and eating practices benefits the whole family | ||||||||||
74 | Smoking | Knowledge Social influences |
Shaping knowledge Health consequences |
Overall lack of awareness regarding the link between smoking and ill health. No awareness of the link between smoking and diabetes Smoking perceived to be common among certain groups: farmers, younger people etc. |
Stigma: smoking in front of elders, women etc. Not acceptable to smoke in public spaces (bus, mosques etc) Family: less likely to smoke if it is not done in the family Family: discouraging smoking/encouraging to give up Peer pressure to smoke Religion discouraging smoking Quitting because of work Less likely to smoke with age |
Straight information about smoking and perceptions of smokers: - Perceptions of people who smoke: mostly men, young, farmers, students, rural areas. - It is more men than women who smoke, but all different types of people smoke. They also may take other tobacco products. - There is some stigma regarding smoking, for example people will not smoke in front of their elders, women and in spaces such as the mosque. - It is important not to smoke in front of people as passive smoking can also cause harm to those around them. - Family and peer groups have an important role in not smoking – people are less likely to start smoking if their friends and family don’t smoke. We can also encourage each other to stop smoking. - People may also give up smoking because of their age, health, religious reasons and because of their work. - It is good to be motivated to give up smoking. There are also health consequences of smoking. - Reminder of the consequences of smoking: - People who smoke are at increased risk of diabetes, cancer, lung diseases, heart diseases, brain stroke and poor circulation, erectile dysfunction in males and infertility in women, tooth and gum disease. - Diabetics who smoke are less able to control their diabetes. Smokers with diabetes have a higher risk for complications of diabetes such as: heart and kidney disease, poor blood flow in the legs and feet that can lead to ulcers and infections, eye problems and damaged nerves |
Men and women Diabetic and non-diabetic |
Doctors voice | Perceptions of smoking and stigma is taken from the formative research | |
77 | Smoking | Beliefs about capabilities Memory, attention and decision process Social influences |
Modelling behaviour Shaping knowledge Social support |
Belief that can only give up smoking by quitting completely Addiction to smoking |
Family: less likely to smoke if it is not done in the family Family: discouraging smoking/encouraging to give up |
Scenario: an uncle discovers his nephew smokes. His nephew admits he does but does not know how to stop as he is addicted. The uncle offers family support and also gives tips for giving up smoking. - Tips for giving up smoking: - You need to be personally motivated, think of the reasons you don’t want to smoke - Distract yourself with other things: talk to other, sport, work - You can cut down slowly the number of cigarettes you smoke every day until or stop completely - Keep trying eventually you will be able to give up - You can try and stop smoking with someone else - Change routines associated with smoking/do other things: exercise, namaj, talk to people - Spend time with friends/family who do not smoke - Key messages: - ways to give up smoking - family support to give up smoking |
Men Non-diabetic |
Drama |
Message production and delivery
The finalised table of contents was used to guide the intervention; specifically exact information needed to be shared as part of the intervention – and ensured all barriers and enablers emerging from the research were addressed. The table was shared with scriptwriters and a production company who were responsible for the format of the messages and making them both entertaining and understandable. Songs, dramas and straight information were all used with the language colloquial and tailored to the region. Project researchers and clinicians had final editorial control over the messages to ensure they were in-line with the context, and that they represented the content. A total of around 100 unique messages were produced and delivered to approximately 9000 individuals across 32 villages in Faridpur on a twice weekly basis between October 2016 and December 2017.
Discussion
In response to a lack of guidance in research regarding the development of a theory-driven mHealth intervention rooted in local context, we have developed and applied a six-step process to develop content for mHealth messages related to awareness raising and lifestyle changes for prevention and control of diabetes in rural Bangladesh. The process involved integrating in-depth qualitative contextual research with theory. The benefits of the steps outlined in the paper are that they are replicable and hence the model developed can be tested in other contexts. The exact methods used in the formative research do not need to be replicated, however contextual research identifying enablers and barriers to behaviour change is important. TDF and the corresponding BCTs can be applied to identify barriers and enablers to behaviour change. Hence the steps provide a guideline to intervention development, and due to the comprehensive nature of TDF and BCTs there is room for flexibility regarding the problems the interventions may address and the techniques that can be implemented to address them. The effectiveness of the messages is yet to be tested through the outcome of the trial and if applied in other contexts.
Many behaviour change interventions are targeted at individuals, and in those cases a clear target and pathway of change may be needed. For example, according to the transtheoretical change model, change is assumed to follow certain stages through which they are targeted [5,13]. While other models may account for wider societal and higher level influences (social ecological model for example) [25], pathways, influences and beliefs vary widely not just according to individuals, but also groups. Behaviour and behaviour change is complex, having multiple targets is more complex: based on our experiences we believe it would be difficult for a classic, single theory to address these challenges. While the broadness of TDF, COM-B and BCTs have been criticised for not being specific enough, we found this to be a strength when applied to a population level intervention as it means a range of strategies and processes could be applied – increasing the likelihood of appealing to different segments of the population. For example we could classify problems specific to both genders and find appropriate BCTs to address them. Furthermore, within the range of the domains and BCTs, specific needs and approaches could be addressed according to specific barriers and enablers. We found TDF and the process we developed useful in enabling us to break down the specific needs of a population, identify what needs to change and what can be built upon and identify techniques in which this could be achieved.
An important aspect of the intervention was the packaging of the messages – with a production company being responsible for this. It was therefore important to convey the primary research effectively so that it could be applied appropriately. We did have a discussion about the scriptwriters conducting the qualitative research, in order for them to have a detailed understanding of the context. However, this would have meant them needing to be trained in qualitative research methods and be willing and able to spend time in the field. In practice members of the research team were more involved than planned in the editing and production of the messages – in order to ensure context was appropriately conveyed. Lessons learned from this collaboration were: collaborations and communication need to be carefully thought through and given plenty of time, as well as considering very early on in the process what collaborators of different background need and expect from each other and consider creative ways of achieving this (for example scriptwriters spending time in the field, and researchers learning how to write scripts).
Limitations
There were limitations to the study and the intervention. The broadness of the TDF and COM-B frameworks makes it difficult to unpick and assess exactly what aspects of the theory were effective. However, for the purpose of message development at a population level having a broad theoretical framework was useful (as explained in the discussion) and therefore for this study the benefits of the broadness of the models outweighed their potential weakness. Furthermore, as part of the trial we did conduct a process evaluation, which may illuminate what aspects of the intervention worked well and what did not. We were also limited by the nature of the mHealth intervention, as we were very limited in the behaviour change techniques that could be applied, and the intervention lacked two-way interaction.
Conclusion
A replicable process for developing the content of voice messages (and perhaps other interventions) for behavioural change, grounded in both theory and in-depth research, has been developed. Through identifying specific barriers and enablers to behaviour change from contextual research and categorising them according to the transtheoretical domain framework, BCTs can be applied to the barriers and enablers to promote behaviour change. While the process requires thorough research, clear outcomes and an application of TDF, the packaging of the intervention is also important. The six-step process developed is also significant as it is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to apply TDF and the COM-B model in a low-income setting. Thus it is particularly important that the local context is considered, and the behaviour change approaches contextualised appropriately. Ultimately the results of the trial and on-going evaluation will indicate the effectiveness of the intervention and its development, but the deep understanding of the intervention and the design decisions underpinning it will contribute enormously to the interpretation of the trial findings.
Responsible Editor Peter Byass, Umeå University, Sweden
Funding Statement
The research and interventions were funded through the trial, which is funded by the Medical Research Council UK (MR/M016501/1) under the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases (GACD) Diabetes Programme. The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank m-World Bangladesh, and particularly Faisal Mahmud, for providing us technical expertise and their assistance in the final delivery of the mHealth messages.
Author contributions
HMJ wrote the first draft of the manuscript, contributed to the design and analysis of the formative research data and led the development of the mHealth intervention. JM was involved in design and analysis of the formative research and contributed to the development of the mHealth intervention. KAk collected the research data, and contributed to the design and analysis of the formative research. AK, NA and SKS contributed to the development of the intervention. AKAK and KAz provided oversight and advice on the intervention development. TN and HBB were part of the trial team and read and commented on the manuscript. EF provided expertise, contributed to the intervention development and contributed significantly to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Ethics and consent
The formative research was collected as part of a large cluster randomised control trial. Ethical approval was received for the research from the University College London Research Ethics Committee (4766/002) and the Ethical Review Committee of the Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS-ERC/EC/t5100246). All research respondents gave either informed written consent or consent by thumbprint to participate in the study.
Paper context
The evidence for the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in low-income countries is somewhat limited, and many lack a theoretical basis and context is not always considered. This paper addresses some of the gaps in research – it reports the process of applying qualitative research to behavioural theory to guide the development of an mHealth intervention in Bangladesh. It is hoped that the principles and process developed will be applied and tested in other contexts.
References
- [1].Hall CS, Fottrell E, Wilkinson S, et al. Assessing the impact of mHealth interventions in low- and middle-income countries – what has been shown to work? Glob Health Action. 2014;7:25606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Bergström A, Fottrell E, Hopkins H, et al. mHealth: can mobile technology improve health in low- and middle- income countries? UCL public policy briefing. 2015. [cited2018November6]Available from:https://www.ucl.ac.uk/public-policy/sites/public-policy/files/migrated-files/mhealth_briefing.pdf
- [3].Fottrell E.Commentary: the emperor’s new phone. BMJ. 2015;350:h2051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Gurman TA, Rubin ER, Ross AA. Effectiveness of mHealth behaviour change communication in developing countries: a systematic review of literature. J Health Commun. 2012;17:82–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Ram J, et al. Effectiveness of mobile phone messaging in prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle modification in men in India: a prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1:191–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Cotterez AP, Durant N, Agne AA, et al. Internet interventions to support lifestyle modification for diabetes management: a systematic review of the evidence. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28:243–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Nationl Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT) Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2014: key indicators. 2015[cited2018November6] Available from:https://www.k4health.org/sites/default/files/bdhs_2014.pdf
- [8].Ahmed T, Lucas H, Khan AS, et al. eHealth and mHealth initiatives in Bangladesh: a scoping study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:260–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].World Health Organisation Global report on diabetes. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- [10].International Diabetes Federation Diabetes atlas. 8th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Bleich SN, Koehlmoos TLP, Rashid M, et al. Noncommunicable chronic disease in Bangladesh: overview of existing programs and priorities going forward. Health Policy. 2011;100:282–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Fottrell E, Jennings H, Kuddus A, et al. The effect of community groups and mobile phone messages on the prevention and control of diabetes in rural Bangladesh: study protocol for a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Michie S, van Stralen M, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics Bangladesh population and housing census 2011. Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- [15].Fottrell E, Ahmed N, Shaha SK, et al. Age, sex, and wealth distribution of diabetes, hypertension and non-communicable disease risk factors among adults in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional epidemiological survey. BMJ Global Health. 2018. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Green JT, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: SAGE; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Oxford: AltaMira Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- [18].Ogden J. Celebrating variability and a call to limit systematisation: the example of the behaviour change technique taxonomy and the behaviour change wheel. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10:245–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Ogden J. Theories, timing and choice of audience: some key tensions in health psychology and a response to commentaries on Ogden (2016). Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10:274–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. on behalf of the ‘Psychological Theory’ Group Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:26–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an International consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Atkins S, Michie S. Conference on ‘Changing dietary behaviour: physiology through to practice’ Symposium 4: changing diet and behaviour – putting theory into practice. Designing interventions to change eating behaviours. Proc Nutr Soc. 2015;74:164–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Fishbain M, Yzer MC. Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Commun Theory. 2003;13:164–183. [Google Scholar]