Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2018 Nov 7;36(1):39–45. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1349-4

Gene variants identified by whole-exome sequencing in 33 French women with premature ovarian insufficiency

Xiang Yang 1,2,3, Philippe Touraine 4,5, Swapna Desai 1, Gregory Humphreys 6, Huaiyang Jiang 1, Alexander Yatsenko 1, Aleksandar Rajkovic 7,8,
PMCID: PMC6338598  PMID: 30406445

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the potential genetic etiology of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI).

Methods

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was done on DNA samples from women diagnosed with POI. Mutations identified were analyzed by in silico tools and were annotated according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Plausible variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

Results

Four of the 33 individuals (12%) carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, and 6 individuals carried variants of unknown significance. The genes identified with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants included PMM2, MCM9, and PSMC3IP.

Conclusions

WES is an efficient tool for identifying gene variants in POI women; however, interpretation of variants is hampered by few exome studies involving ovarian disorders and the need for trio sequencing to determine inheritance and to detect de novo variants.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10815-018-1349-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Premature ovarian insufficiency, Whole-exome sequencing, Gene variants

Introduction

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a heterogeneous condition occurring when a woman experiences loss of ovarian activity before the age of 40. This disorder affects approximately 1 in 100 women and is clinically characterized by amenorrhea (primary or secondary), hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (syndromic or nonsyndromic), and infertility [1, 2].

Aside from external pathogenic factors such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and ovarian surgery, POI can be a developmental disorder caused by genetic abnormalities. Structural and numerical changes in X chromosomes, including Turner’s syndrome (45, X) and X-linked mental retardation, make up significant subgroups of POI [3]. Also, over 50 genes [4] have been found to cause ovarian dysfunction in POI by modulating immune function, metabolism, gonadal development, hormonal signaling, meiosis, and DNA repair [2]. Currently, only karyotyping and fragile X mental retardation 1 screening [5, 6] are recommended in clinical genetic testing for POI. No specific recommendations exist to test individual or panel of genes. In this pilot study, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) on 33 French women diagnosed with POI.

Materials and methods

Participants

Participants were recruited at the Center for Endocrine Rare Disorders of Growth and Development and Center for Gynecological Disorders in France. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Pittsburgh (PRO09080427). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Thirty-three French Caucasian women presented with primary amenorrhea and elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level (> 25 mIU/ml on two occasions 4 weeks apart) were diagnosed with POI and were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study for further evaluation. Hormone levels, including luteinizing hormone, estradiol, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), and testosterone, were determined in order to evaluate pituitary and ovarian function. Pelvic ultrasound was done to assess ovarian anatomy. Bone mineral density was examined to check for osteoporosis. Prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and antibodies against ovary, adrenal gland, and thyroid were measured to exclude endocrine and immune system disorders that could lead to amenorrhea. Karyotype analysis and fragile X screening were performed as part of the standard genetic screening. Consanguinity and family history of disease, including POI, autoimmune diseases, and other genetic defects, were recorded.

Whole-exome sequencing

Peripheral blood samples were collected at the Department of Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Centre des Maladies Endocriniennes Rares de la Croissance et du Développement, Centre des Pathologies Gynécologiques Rares in France. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples. WES was performed on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) at Magee Clinical Genomics Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA. Agilent SureSelect V5 Capture Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was used for exome capture. The average coverage of WES was from 150× to 250× reads on the target regions of the capture kit, with an error rate of variant calling < 1% [7, 8]. The FastX Toolkit (Cold Spring Harbor Lab, Cold Spring Harbor, NY) was used to trim the first five base pairs at the 5′ end of reads, and Cutadapt was applied to remove the adapters for preparation. Data was aligned to NCBI37/hg19 using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner [9]. Local realignment around indels and quality recalibration of variants were conducted using genome analysis tool kit (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA); for variant calling, we used genome analysis tool kit Haplotype Caller. We also filtered variants based on their location in genes known to be previously associated with female infertility (listed in Supplemental data 2). IGV alignment was used to visually inspect variant calls.

Sanger sequencing

FPOI41 DNA sample was analyzed by Sanger sequencing to determine if the two variants (c.496_497delCT, p.R166Afs; c.430_431insGA, p.L144*) in PSMC3IP were in cis or trans. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was conducted with the LongAmp™ Taq2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, NEB, MA) using the forward primer: 5′-AGTACACTGTCCCCACGTTTC-3′ and reverse primer: 5′-GTGTAGCGGCTGATCTGGTG-3′. PCR products were then purified using NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey nagel, Duren, Germany). The products were ligated into vectors using TOPO TA Cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and were transformed into NEB 5-alpha competent Escherichia coli cells (New England Biolabs, NEB, MA). Plasmids were extracted from individual E. coli colonies using PureLink Quick Plasmid Miniprep kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced at Genomics Research Core, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, PA.

Variant classification

Each gene variant was evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), published in 2015 [10]. These guidelines recognize five classes of variants: benign, likely benign, uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. We considered variants in classes of pathogenic or likely pathogenic as causative. Variants with minor allelic frequency in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database > 1% were excluded. Variants not present in the 1000 Genomes Project [11], Exome Variant Server data sets, Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, Cambridge, MA) [12], or the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (dbSNP) [13] were considered novel variants. Novel variants and those with very low frequency found in population are considered as moderate evidence for pathogenicity (PM2). Nonsense and frameshift mutations, canonical ± 1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon irregularities, and single- or multi-exon deletion variants in a gene where loss of function are known mechanisms of disease are strongly recognized as evidence for pathogenicity (PSV1). For nonsynonymous variants, prediction algorithms were applied. PhyloP, scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), and PolyPhen-2 were applied to determine conservation, tolerance, and impact of amino acid substitution on protein function, respectively. These prediction tools have 70–80% predictive value in assigning pathogenicity of variants [14]. Variants that were conserved, deleterious, damaging, and previously published as disease causing were assigned as pathogenic (PP3).

Results

DNA samples from 33 individuals were sequenced and we identified plausibly causative variants in 10 individuals. The clinical characteristics for these 10 individuals are given in Table 1; complete clinical information can be found in Supplemental Data 1. They were labeled according to order of recruitment. The age of diagnosis ranged from 14 to 28. Among them, six patients presented with delayed pubertal development; the other patients presented with normal puberty. They all presented with ultrasound findings consistent with atrophic or undetectable ovaries and absent follicles, except FPOI16 for whom ultrasound was not performed.

Table 1.

Clinical profiles of 10 POI women identified with plausible variants

Patient ID Puberty FSH* (mIU/ml) Estradiol* (pg/ml) AMH* (ng/ml) Karyotype Pelvic ultrasonography Variants of interest
Ovary size* (mm) Follicle
Right Left
FPOI8 Normal 104 19 0 Normal 16 × 10 15 × 6 Absent NR5A1, c.1093C>T
FPOI10 Normal 100 56 ND Normal 17 × 3 26 × 5 Absent GDF9, c.1157G>T
FPOI11 Delayed 60 5 ND Normal Not viewable Absent MARF1, c.1684C>T
FPOI16 Delayed 50 34 ND 46, XX+ fra17p12 ND ND PMM2, c.484C>T, c.255+1G>A
FPOI22 Delayed 96 5 ND 46, X,t(X;14) (q22;q24) 16 × 6 13 × 6 Absent LMNA, c.454C>A
FPOI24 Delayed 110 5 1 46, XX(t2:7) Not viewable Absent MCM9, c.1651C>T
FPOI28 Normal 73 17 1.27 Normal 26 × 16 21 × 15 Present FSHR, c.1274C>T, c.1209C>A
FPOI32 Normal 73 10 0.05 Normal Not viewable Absent HARS2, c.1010A>G
FPOI38 Delayed 114 12 0.05 Normal Not viewable Absent MCM9, c.1784C>G, c.905-1G>T
FPOI41 Delayed 140.3 12 0.05 Normal Not viewable Absent PSMC3IP, c.496_497delCT, c.430_431insGA

*Normal ranges: FSH 3.5–12.5 mIU/ml, estradiol 13–166 pg/ml, AMH 0.5–3.8 ng/ml. Ovary size: 3–5 cm × 1.5–3 cm, referred from Pathology Associates of Lexington, P.A.

**ND not done

Among 10 individuals with candidate variants, four individuals were identified with pathogenic variants. FPOI16 had pathogenic variants in phosphomannomutase 2 (PMM2), FPOI24 and FPOI38 individuals had pathogenic variants in mini-chromosome maintenance complex component 9 (MCM9), and FPOI41 had pathogenic variant in proteasome 26s subunit interacting protein (PSMC3IP). Six individuals were identified with variants of unknown significance (VUS). The variant information and the representative phenotypes are summarized in Table 2. Detailed variant information can be found in Supplemental data 3.

Table 2.

Variants identified in 10 POI women

Patient ID Gene Mutation type* Gene MIM number [40] Transcript ID Nucleotide change AA change Reported dbSNP ACMG evidence Pathogenicity
FPOI8 NR5A1 Het Missense 184757 NM_004959 c.1093C>T p.R365W Novel PM2, PP3 VUS
FPOI10 GDF9 Hom Missense 601918 NM_005260 c.1157G>T p.C386F Novel PM2, PP3 VUS
FPOI11 MARF1 Hom Missense 614593 NM_001184998 c.1684C>T p.R562C Novel PM2, PP3 VUS
FPOI16 PMM2 Two het Missense PMM2-CDG,601785 NM_000303 c.484C>T p.R162W rs104894526 PS4, PS3, PM2, PP3 Pathogenic
Splicing c.255+1G>A rs1060499598 PSV1, PS4, PM2, PP5
FPOI22 LMNA Het Missense Malouf syndrome, 150330 NM_170707 c.454C>A p.L152I Novel PM1, PM2, PP2 VUS
FPOI24 MCM9 Hom Stop-gain 610098 NM_017696 c.1651C>T p.Q551X Novel** PSV1, PM2 Pathogenic
FPOI28 FSHR Two het Missense 136435 NM_000145 c.1274C>T p.T425I Novel PM2, PP3 VUS
Missense c.1209C>A p.N403 K Novel PM2, PP3
FPOI32 HARS2 Hom Missense PRLTS2, 600783 NM_012208 c.1010A>G p.Y337C rs537198287 PM2, PP3 VUS
FPOI38 MCM9 Two het Missense 610098 NM_017696 c.1784C>G p.T595R Novel** PM2, PP3 Pathogenic
Splicing c.905-1G>T rs149099524 PSV1, PM2
FPOI41 PSMC3IP Two het Deletion 608665 NM_016556 c.496_497delCT p.R166Afs Novel PSV1, PM2 Likely pathogenic
Insertion c.430_431insGA p.L144* Novel PSV1, PM2

*Hom homozygous, Het heterozygous dominant, Two het two heterozygous

**Same participant results have already been published in [25]

Discussions

Pathogenic variants

FPOI16 was previously diagnosed with congenital disorder of glycosylation (CDG), based on clinical presentation and biochemical studies, at the age of 15. CDG is a genetically heterogeneous syndrome, with a wide range of phenotypes. Autosomal recessive mutation in PMM2 is the most common genetic cause for CDG and presents with central nervous system disorder including hypotonia, intellectual disability, cerebellar syndrome, and lack of secondary sexual development in adult female [15, 16]. PMM2 gene has eight exons encoding the protein necessary for synthesis of guanosine diphosphate (GDP) mannose [17]. Two heterozygous variants in PMM2, missense variant on exon 6 (c.484C>T, p.R162W) and donor splicing site variant on exon 3 (c.255+1G>A), were identified in this woman. Both variants were identified as pathogenic in previous ClinVar submissions, (SCV000329703.5 and SCV000536849.1). c.484C>T was previously reported in CDG patients [18, 19] and functional studies suggest the damaging effect on PMM2 protein stability [20]. Another French family with CDG carrying the same two heterozygous variants was reported in 2005 [21]. Karyotype analysis found that FPOI16 had fragile chromosome 17 on the short arm (46 XX+fra17p12); however, this is a well-known fragile site with no known functional consequence. We assumed that these two variants in FPOI16 were in trans, given the phenotype, biochemical studies, and known pathogenicity of variants. Parents were not available.

FPOI24 and FPOI38 both had pathogenic variants in MCM9, a gene that was recently implicated in POI [7]. FPOI24 was born to a consanguineous family and was diagnosed with POI when she was 18. FPOI38 was diagnosed with POI at the age of 20. FPOI24 and FPOI38 both had absent ovaries on the ultrasound. Homozygous variants and two heterozygous variants in MCM9 were identified in FPOI24 (c.1651C>T, p.Q551X) and FPOI38 (c.1784C>G, p.T595R; c.905-1G>T), respectively. MCM8 and MCM9 are required in homologous recombination and the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks [4, 22]. In mice, deficiency of these two proteins causes infertility due to hypogonadism and oocyte depletion [22]. MCM9 variants were previously associated with primary amenorrhea in unrelated consanguineous families [7, 23], and unlike previous report of short stature [7], FPOI24 and FPOI38 were of normal height. MCM9 gene contains 13 exons [24], and the stop-gain novel variant of c.1651C>T in exon 9 is predicted to cause truncated protein, p.Q551X, and loss of MCM9 function. Both of the variants in FPOI38, c.1784C>G and c.905-1G>T, that affects the acceptor splicing site on exon 6 were assigned to be pathogenic. The MCM9 variants identified in this study were novel and were previously published by our group [25].

FPOI41 was diagnosed with primary amenorrhea at 28 years of age and presented with elevated FSH level and ovaries were not visualized on ultrasound examination. Two heterozygous variants in PSMC3IP (c.496_497delCT, p.R166Afs; c.430_431insGA, p.L144*) were identified in this individual. PSMC3IP gene has nine exons and encodes a protein that functions in meiotic recombination and works as a coactivator of ligand-dependent transcription mediated by nuclear hormone receptors [26]. Autosomal recessive mutations in PSMC3IP lead to ovarian dysgenesis characterized by undetectable ovary and a hypoplastic uterus [26]. Both the exon 6 variant, p.R166Afs, and the exon 5 variant, p.L144*, identified in our study are novel and were predicted to cause frameshift mutation in PSMC3IP. We confirmed by Sanger sequencing that these two closely located variants were inherited in trans.

Variants of unknown significance

Aside from the pathogenic variants in PMM2, MCM9, and PSMC3IP mentioned above, six individuals, FPOI8, FPOI10, FPOI11, FPOI22, FPOI28, and FPOI32, were identified with variants of unknown significance in nuclear receptor subfamily 5, group A (NR5A1), growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9), meiosis regulator and mRNA stability factor 1 (MARF1), lamin A/C (LMNA), follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), and histidyl-tRNA synthetase 2 (HARS2) (Supplemental data 3).

FPOI8 was diagnosed at 14 years of age with primary amenorrhea and experienced normal puberty. She presented with low estradiol and small ovaries. Heterozygous variant in NR5A1 (c.1093C>T, p.R365W) was identified. NR5A1 encodes a transcription factor that regulates the development of the adrenal and reproductive system [27]. Heterozygous NR5A1 variants cause 46 and XX sex reversal and associate with POI [28]. This variant was predicted as potentially damaging by computational analyses. No further information was found in gene variant databases.

FPOI10 was diagnosed at 17 years of age with primary amenorrhea and experienced normal puberty. Ultrasound examination showed small ovaries and absent follicles. She had elevated FSH level and normal estradiol level. Homozygous variant (c.1157G>T, p.C386F) in GDF9 was identified. GDF9 is specifically expressed in oocytes and is an attractive candidate gene for POI. Mouse model deficient in GDF9 is infertile and primary follicles do not grow [29]. GDF9 variants in POI women have been previously reported in Indian [30], Chinese [31], and Caucasian [32] populations. All the previous variants reported in GDF9 were heterozygous and unlikely to be pathogenic. One homozygous variant was identified in a Brazilian woman with primary amenorrhea [33]. FPOI10 variant was predicted to be conserved and damaging by computational analysis. However, we could not assign it as pathogenic due to the lack of functional studies and previous reports on this variant.

FPOI11 was diagnosed at 15 years of age with primary amenorrhea. She did not have identifiable ovaries on ultrasound examination. She was identified with homozygous variant (c.1684C>T, p.R562C) in MARF1. MARF1 was found to be important in regulating oogenesis and genomic stability in mice [34]. We are not aware of previous reports associating MARF1 variants and POI. c.1684C>T was predicted to be conserved and damaging by computational analysis; however, the lack of functional studies makes this a variant of unknown significance.

FPOI22 was diagnosed at 16 years of age with primary amenorrhea. She presented with elevated FSH and estradiol levels and had small ovaries and absent follicles on ultrasound examination. She carried a heterozygous variant (c.454C>A, p.L152I) in the LMNA gene. LMNA is a structural protein component of the nuclear lamina. LMNA variants have been found in individuals with POI and cardiomyopathy [35] (Malouf syndrome). Variants in this gene have not been reported in women with isolated POI. It is noteworthy that translocation between X chromosome and chromosome 14 was also detected. This may lead to loss of function of Xq22, which has been implicated in ovarian function [36]. Thus, for the FPOI22 case, we considered X chromosome translocation to be more plausible cause of POI phenotype than LMNA variant.

FPOI28 was diagnosed at 18 years of age with primary amenorrhea. She experienced normal puberty with elevated FSH and low AMH levels. She was identified with two heterozygous variants (c.1274C>T, p.T425I; c.1209C>A, p.N403K) in FSHR. FSH/FSHR interaction plays a significant part in regulating ovarian function by regulating follicle growth and estrogen production. FSHR mutations first reported in Finnish women were considered the first autosomal mechanism causing POI [37]. Variants of FHSR lead to oocyte dysfunction, characterized by a small ovary phenotype. Consistent with ovarian dysgenesis, small ovaries and small follicles were noted in FPOI28. These variants have not been previously reported as pathogenic, and functional studies are lacking.

FPOI32 was diagnosed at 27 years of age with primary amenorrhea and presented with absent ovaries on ultrasound examination. She was identified with homozygous variant (c.1010A>G, p.Y337C) in HARS2. The HARS2 gene encodes histidyl-tRNA synthetase, a highly conserved protein that functions in mitochondria. Damage to this enzyme leads to Perrault syndrome (PRLTS2), characterized by primary amenorrhea and progressive sensorineural deafness in both males and females [38]. Hearing loss was not documented in FPOI32. This variant was damaging by computational analysis; however, it has not been previously reported as pathogenic and functional studies are lacking.

Conclusion

In this pilot study, we identified pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in 4 out of 33 individuals (12%) with primary amenorrhea and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. These results suggest a strong genetic etiology in these women and justify utilization of whole-exome sequencing for diagnostic purposes. A small number of studies with a small number of participants among women with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism have hampered identification of variants associated with reproductive pathologies. It is difficult to assign pathogenicity when variants are novel and missense and functional studies are lacking. We were unable to get parental DNA samples; thus, whether different heterozygous variants in the same gene were in cis or trans could not be confirmed for all participants. Getting other family members from affected adults can be difficult, but it is very important to determine whether variants are in cis or trans, as well as whether variant is de novo. This is especially important since de novo variants contribute pathology to 40% of individuals with Mendelian disorders [39]. Although WES is an efficient tool for identifying gene variants in POI women, interpretation of variants is hampered by few exome studies involving ovarian disorders and the need for trio sequencing.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1 (31.7KB, xlsx)

(XLSX 31 kb)

ESM 2 (42.9KB, xlsx)

(XLSX 42 kb)

ESM 3 (16KB, xlsx)

(XLSX 16 kb)

Acknowledgements

We thank the affected individuals for their participation in this research study on the genetics of premature ovarian insufficiency. We thank the Magee Clinical Genomic Laboratory at Magee-Womens Hospital, UPMC (Pittsburgh, PA), for the whole-exome sequencing.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD070647 and R21HD074278, A.R.).

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Pittsburgh (PRO09080427). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Xiang Yang, Email: xiy83@pitt.edu.

Philippe Touraine, Email: philippe.touraine@aphp.fr.

Swapna Desai, Email: desais3@mwri.magee.edu.

Gregory Humphreys, Email: humphreysg@mail.magee.edu.

Huaiyang Jiang, Email: jiangh3@mwri.magee.edu.

Alexander Yatsenko, Email: yatsenkoan@mwri.magee.edu.

Aleksandar Rajkovic, Phone: (415)502-4961, Email: aleks.rajkovic@ucsf.edu.

References

  • 1.Nelson LM. Clinical practice. Primary ovarian insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(6):606–614. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0808697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tucker EJ, Grover SR, Bachelot A, Touraine P, Sinclair AH. Premature ovarian insufficiency: new perspectives on genetic cause and phenotypic spectrum. Endocr Rev. 2016;37(6):609–635. doi: 10.1210/er.2016-1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Vos M, Devroey P, Fauser BCJM. Primary ovarian insufficiency. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):911–921. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60355-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Qin Y, Jiao X, Simpson JL, Chen Z-J. Genetics of primary ovarian insufficiency: new developments and opportunities. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):787–808. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Committee opinion no. 605: primary ovarian insufficiency in adolescents and young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):193–7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline Group on POI. Webber L, Davies M, Anderson R, Bartlett J, Braat D, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):926–937. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wood-Trageser MA, Gurbuz F, Yatsenko SA, Jeffries EP, Kotan LD, Surti U, Ketterer DM, Matic J, Chipkin J, Jiang H, Trakselis MA, Topaloglu AK, Rajkovic A. MCM9 mutations are associated with ovarian failure, short stature, and chromosomal instability. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;95(6):754–762. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.AlAsiri S, Basit S, Wood-Trageser MA, Yatsenko SA, Jeffries EP, Surti U, Ketterer DM, Afzal S, Ramzan K, Faiyaz-Ul Haque M, Jiang H, Trakselis MA, Rajkovic A. Exome sequencing reveals MCM8 mutation underlies ovarian failure and chromosomal instability. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):258–262. doi: 10.1172/JCI78473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(5):589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.1000 Genomes Project Consortium. Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536(7616):285–291. doi: 10.1038/nature19057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(1):308–311. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Walters-Sen LC, Hashimoto S, Thrush DL, Reshmi S, Gastier-Foster JM, Astbury C, Pyatt RE. Variability in pathogenicity prediction programs: impact on clinical diagnostics. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2015;3(2):99–110. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schiff M, Roda C, Monin M-L, Arion A, Barth M, Bednarek N, Bidet M, Bloch C, Boddaert N, Borgel D, Brassier A, Brice A, Bruneel A, Buissonnière R, Chabrol B, Chevalier MC, Cormier-Daire V, de Barace C, de Maistre E, de Saint-Martin A, Dorison N, Drouin-Garraud V, Dupré T, Echenne B, Edery P, Feillet F, Fontan I, Francannet C, Labarthe F, Gitiaux C, Héron D, Hully M, Lamoureux S, Martin-Coignard D, Mignot C, Morin G, Pascreau T, Pincemaille O, Polak M, Roubertie A, Thauvin-Robinet C, Toutain A, Viot G, Vuillaumier-Barrot S, Seta N, de Lonlay P. Clinical, laboratory and molecular findings and long-term follow-up data in 96 French patients with PMM2-CDG (phosphomannomutase 2-congenital disorder of glycosylation) and review of the literature. J Med Genet. 2017;54(12):843–851. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sparks SE, Krasnewich DM. PMM2-CDG (CDG-Ia). In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, Bean LJ, et al., editors. GeneReviews(®). Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993. [PubMed]
  • 17.Schollen E, Pardon E, Heykants L, Renard J, Doggett NA, Callen DF, Cassiman JJ, Matthijs G. Comparative analysis of the phosphomannomutase genes PMM1, PMM2 and PMM2psi: the sequence variation in the processed pseudogene is a reflection of the mutations found in the functional gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7(2):157–164. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matthijs G, Schollen E, Pardon E, Veiga-Da-Cunha M, Jaeken J, Cassiman JJ, et al. Mutations in PMM2, a phosphomannomutase gene on chromosome 16p13, in carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein type I syndrome (Jaeken syndrome) Nat Genet. 1997;16(1):88–92. doi: 10.1038/ng0597-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pérez-Dueñas B, García-Cazorla A, Pineda M, Poo P, Campistol J, Cusí V, Schollen E, Matthijs G, Grunewald S, Briones P, Pérez-Cerdá C, Artuch R, Vilaseca MA. Long-term evolution of eight Spanish patients with CDG type Ia: typical and atypical manifestations. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2009;13(5):444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yuste-Checa P, Gámez A, Brasil S, Desviat LR, Ugarte M, Pérez-Cerdá C, Pérez B. The effects of PMM2-CDG-causing mutations on the folding, activity, and stability of the PMM2 protein. Hum Mutat. 2015;36(9):851–860. doi: 10.1002/humu.22817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Le Bizec C, Vuillaumier-Barrot S, Barnier A, Dupré T, Durand G, Seta N. A new insight into PMM2 mutations in the French population. Hum Mutat. 2005;25(5):504–505. doi: 10.1002/humu.9336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lutzmann M, Grey C, Traver S, Ganier O, Maya-Mendoza A, Ranisavljevic N, Bernex F, Nishiyama A, Montel N, Gavois E, Forichon L, de Massy B, Méchali M. MCM8- and MCM9-deficient mice reveal gametogenesis defects and genome instability due to impaired homologous recombination. Mol Cell. 2012;47(4):523–534. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fauchereau F, Shalev S, Chervinsky E, Beck-Fruchter R, Legois B, Fellous M, Caburet S, Veitia RA. A non-sense MCM9 mutation in a familial case of primary ovarian insufficiency. Clin Genet. 2016;89(5):603–607. doi: 10.1111/cge.12736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lutzmann M, Maiorano D, Méchali M. Identification of full genes and proteins of MCM9, a novel, vertebrate-specific member of the MCM2-8 protein family. Gene. 2005;362:51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Desai S, Wood-Trageser M, Matic J, Chipkin J, Jiang H, Bachelot A, Dulon J, Sala C, Barbieri C, Cocca M, Toniolo D, Touraine P, Witchel S, Rajkovic A. MCM8 and MCM9 nucleotide variants in women with primary ovarian insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(2):576–582. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zangen D, Kaufman Y, Zeligson S, Perlberg S, Fridman H, Kanaan M, Abdulhadi-Atwan M, Abu Libdeh A, Gussow A, Kisslov I, Carmel L, Renbaum P, Levy-Lahad E. XX ovarian dysgenesis is caused by a PSMC3IP/HOP2 mutation that abolishes coactivation of estrogen-driven transcription. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89(4):572–579. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tremblay JJ, Viger RS. A mutated form of steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1 G35E) that causes sex reversal in humans fails to synergize with transcription factor GATA-4. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(43):42637–42642. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305485200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Janse F, de With LM, Duran KJ, Kloosterman WP, Goverde AJ, Lambalk CB, Laven JS, Fauser BC, Giltay JC, Dutch Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Consortium Limited contribution of NR5A1 (SF-1) mutations in women with primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) Fertil Steril. 2012;97(1):141–6.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dong J, Albertini DF, Nishimori K, Kumar TR, Lu N, Matzuk MM. Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis. Nature. 1996;383(6600):531–535. doi: 10.1038/383531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dixit H, Rao LK, Padmalatha V, Kanakavalli M, Deenadayal M, Gupta N, Chakravarty B, Singh L. Mutational screening of the coding region of growth differentiation factor 9 gene in Indian women with ovarian failure. Menopause. 2005;12(6):749–754. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000184424.96437.7a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao H, Qin Y, Kovanci E, Simpson JL, Chen Z-J, Rajkovic A. Analyses of GDF9 mutation in 100 Chinese women with premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(5):1474–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kovanci E, Rohozinski J, Simpson JL, Heard MJ, Bishop CE, Carson SA. Growth differentiating factor-9 mutations may be associated with premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):143–146. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.França MM, Funari MFA, Nishi MY, Narcizo AM, Domenice S, Costa EMF, Lerario AM, Mendonca BB. Identification of the first homozygous 1-bp deletion in GDF9 gene leading to primary ovarian insufficiency by using targeted massively parallel sequencing. Clin Genet. 2018;93(2):408–411. doi: 10.1111/cge.13156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Su Y-Q, Sugiura K, Sun F, Pendola JK, Cox GA, Handel MA, Schimenti JC, Eppig JJ. MARF1 regulates essential oogenic processes in mice. Science (80) 2012;335(6075):1496–1499. doi: 10.1126/science.1214680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McPherson E, Turner L, Zador I, Reynolds K, Macgregor D, Giampietro PF. Ovarian failure and dilated cardiomyopathy due to a novel lamin mutation. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(4):567–572. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Krauss CM, Turksoy RN, Atkins L, McLaughlin C, Brown LG, Page DC. Familial premature ovarian failure due to an interstitial deletion of the long arm of the X chromosome. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(3):125–131. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707163170301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aittomäki K, Lucena JL, Pakarinen P, Sistonen P, Tapanainen J, Gromoll J, et al. Mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene causes hereditary hypergonadotropic ovarian failure. Cell. 1995;82(6):959–968. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90275-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pierce SB, Chisholm KM, Lynch ED, Lee MK, Walsh T, Opitz JM, Li W, Klevit RE, King MC. Mutations in mitochondrial histidyl tRNA synthetase HARS2 cause ovarian dysgenesis and sensorineural hearing loss of Perrault syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(16):6543–6548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103471108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chong JX, Buckingham KJ, Jhangiani SN, Boehm C, Sobreira N, Smith JD, Harrell TM, McMillin M, Wiszniewski W, Gambin T, Coban Akdemir ZH, Doheny K, Scott AF, Avramopoulos D, Chakravarti A, Hoover-Fong J, Mathews D, Witmer PD, Ling H, Hetrick K, Watkins L, Patterson KE, Reinier F, Blue E, Muzny D, Kircher M, Bilguvar K, López-Giráldez F, Sutton VR, Tabor HK, Leal SM, Gunel M, Mane S, Gibbs RA, Boerwinkle E, Hamosh A, Shendure J, Lupski JR, Lifton RP, Valle D, Nickerson DA, Centers for Mendelian Genomics. Bamshad MJ. The genetic basis of mendelian phenotypes: discoveries, challenges, and opportunities. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97(2):199–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.OMIM - Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [Internet]. cited 2018 Feb 12. Available from: https://omim.org/

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (31.7KB, xlsx)

(XLSX 31 kb)

ESM 2 (42.9KB, xlsx)

(XLSX 42 kb)

ESM 3 (16KB, xlsx)

(XLSX 16 kb)


Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES