Skip to main content
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
. 2018 Feb 27;42(1):102–122. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1439803

Spinal cord injury pharmacotherapy: Current research & development and competitive commercial landscape as of 2015

Jason R Guercio 1,, Jason E Kralic 2, Eric J Marrotte 3, Michael L James 3,4,
PMCID: PMC6340271  PMID: 29485334

Abstract

Context

Current treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) focuses on cord stabilization to prevent further injury, rehabilitation, management of non-motor symptoms, and prevention of complications. Currently, no approved treatments are available, and limited treatment options exist for symptoms and complications associated with chronic SCI. This review describes the pharmacotherapy landscape in SCI from both commercial and research and development (R&D) standpoints through March 2015.

Methods

Information about specific compounds has been obtained through drug pipeline monographs in the Pharmaprojects® (Citeline, Inc., New York, New York, USA) drug database (current as of a search on May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies with compounds in development for SCI (current as of March 24, 2015), and a literature search of published R&D studies to validate the Pharmaprojects® source for selected compounds (current as of March 24, 2015).

Results

Types of studies conducted and outcomes measured in earlier phases of development are described for compounds in clinical development Currently four primary mechanisms are under investigation and may yield promising therapeutic targets: 1) neuronal regeneration; 2) neuroprotection (including anti-inflammation); 3) axonal reconnection; and 4) neuromodulation and signal enhancement. Many other compounds are no longer under investigation for SCI are mentioned; however, in most cases, the reason for terminating their development is not clear.

Conclusion

There is urgent need to develop disease-modifying therapy for SCI, yet the commercial landscape remains small and highly fragmented with a paucity of novel late-stage compounds in R&D.

Key words: Spinal cord injury, Pharmacotherapy, Clinical trials

Introduction

In the United States, approximately 17,500 new spinal cord injuries (SCI) are reported each year with an estimated 285,000 Americans currently experiencing consequences of SCI (http://www.msktc.org/lib/docs/Data_Sheets_/SCIMS_Facts_and_Figures_2017_August_FINAL.pdf). Current treatment focuses on cord stabilization to prevent further injury, rehabilitation, management of non-motor symptoms, and prevention of complications. Urgent need to develop disease-modifying therapy for SCI exists.

Describing pharmacotherapy landscape in SCI from both commercial and research and development (R&D) standpoints, this review will focus on small-molecule and biologics. Studies and outcomes measured in early development and compounds no longer under investigation will be mentioned. While stem cell therapies account for considerable research investment, recent excellent reviews already exist, and detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this reivew.1

Information about specific compounds has been obtained through drug pipeline monographs in the Pharmaprojects® (Citeline, Inc., New York, New York, USA) drug database (current as of a search on May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies with compounds in development for SCI (current as of March 24, 2015), and a literature search of published R&D studies to validate the Pharmaprojects® source for selected compounds (current as of March 24, 2015). Information on current clinical trials in SCI is current as of October 2, 2014. The purpose of this report is to provide a frame of reference to understand the obstacles and successes related to SCI therapeutic development and as a historical perspective of the SCI landscape as of 2015.

Compounds in clinical development

No established commercial leader exists for SCI clinical development (see Table 1) with balanced funding mix from academic institutions, small start-up companies holding compound licenses, private foundation, federal (Department of Defense, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, and Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center), and license-holding company sources. Many funding agencies support preclinical programs with traditional models but are increasingly investing in experimental model organisms, such as non-human primates and miniature pigs.2 Acorda Therapeutics, Inc., (Ardsley, New York, USA) was the only company with more than one program in clinical development for SCI. Notable lack of large pharmaceutical company activity existed.

Table 1. Current SCI clinical trials for interventions to improve neurologic function adapted from Spinal Cord Outcomes Partnership Endeavor (SCOPE) available at www.scope-sci.org (last accessed December 29, 2014).

Number Compound Sponsor/NCT Intervention Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria Treatment Timing & Follow-up Enrollment Phase of Study Primary Outcome Comments
1 Minocycline Rick Hansen Institute
U of Calgary
Alberta Paraplegic
Foundation
NCT01828203
Twice Daily IV Minocycline vs. Placebo for over seven days
All patients receive decompressive spine surgery and blood pressure management per protocol
≥16 yr Age
SCI C0-C8
AIS A, B, C, D
Acute SCI
SCI ≤ 12 hours
F/U 12m
Began 6/2013
Canada
248 subjects
Phase 3
RCT
Efficacy/Safety
ISNCSCI Motor Score recovery from baseline to examination between 3  m and 1 yr post injury;
ISNCSCI Sensory Scores
AIS; SCIM; QoL: SF-36
800 mg initial dose
tapered 100 mg each
dose to 400 mg then
continued twice daily
x 7days
2 Minocycline Hadassah Medical Org
NCT01813240
Minocycline vs. Placebo; dose and route of administration not specified 18-65 yr Age
SCI: AIS B, C, D
Spinal Tumors
causing cord
compression
Not Specified:
Treatment
Initiation
Treatment Duration
F/U Duration
Not begun
Israel
444 subjects
Phase2/3
RCT
Efficacy/Safety
ASIA score (ISNCSCI)
comparison from baseline to 6 months follow-up; SCIM, FIM
Prevention of
Imminent Paralysis
Following Spinal Cord
Trauma or Ischemia
by Minocycline
3 Human Growth Hormone Hospital Nacional de
Paraplejicos de Toledo
(Spain)
NCT01329757
Daily SQ Human Growth Hormone vs placebo dosing for 1 yr; 6 months of rehab 18-75 yr Age
SCI C4-T12 AIS
B,C
Chronic SCI
>18  m SCI
1 yr F/U
Began 4/2011
Spain
76 subjects
Phase 3
RCT
Placebo
Controlled
Efficacy/Safety
ISNCSCI motor sensory
examination; SCIM
Test of 1 yr of daily SQ
Growth Hormone to
improve neuro outcome in chronic incomplete
4 Riluzole AOSpine N. Am
Research Network
NCT01597518
Riluzole 2 × 100 mg by mouth or feeding tube the first 24 hours followed by 2 × 50 mg for the following 13 days after injury vs. placebo in acute SCI 18-75 yr Age
SCI C4-C8
AIS A, B, C
Acute SCI
SCI ≤ 12 hours
F/U 6m
Began 8/2013
N. America
Multicenter
351 subjects
Phase 2/3
RCT
Double-Blind
Efficacy/Safety
Change in ISNCSCI total motor score from baseline to 6 months of F/U
Multicenter Phase2/ 3
trial of riluzole vs.
placebo for improving
motor recovery in
acute SCI
5 BA-210 Bioaxone Biosciences
NCT02053883
3 mg or 6 mg of BA-210 (Cethrin™) vs. Placebo administered extradurally in a fibrin sealant during spinal decompression/stabilization surgery 18-62 yr Age
SCI C4-5 AIS A, B
Acute SCI
SCI ≤ 5 days
F/U 6m
Not yet recruiting
US and Canada
Enrollment target not
specified
Phase 2
Placebo
Controlled
RCT
ISNCSCI UE Motor Score
Other ISNCSCI parameters
SCIM, GRASSP
Phase 2 trial of
Cethrin vs. Placebo
administered during
clinical spinal surgery
in acute SCI
6 AC-105 Acorda Therapeutics
NCT01750684
IV study med every 6 hrs x 6; AC-105 vs. Placebo; i.e. 6 doses over 30 hours 18-65 yr Age
SCI C4-T11
AIS A, B, C
Acute SCI
SCI ≤ 12hr
F/U 6 m
Began 7/2013
Enrolling By
Invitation Only
N. America
40 Subjects
Phase 2
RCT
Safety/Tolerability: comparison of Adverse Event data between groups Study to determine
safety, tolerability and
potential activity of
AC105
7 Dalfampridine Kessler Foundation;
NIDRR; Acorda
Therapeutics
NCT01621113
Oral dalfampridine (Sustained release 4-aminopyridine) vs. placebo for 10 weeks in
chronic motor incomplete SCI receiving locomotor therapy
18-70 yr Age
SCI C4-T10
AIS C, D
Chronic SCI
SCI > 12m
F/U 22wks
Began 6/2012
New Jersey
46 subjects
Phase 2
RCT
Double-Blind
Change in 6 minute walk test at 10 weeks and 22 weeks F/U Test of whether
dalfampridine
improves walking
outcomes in chronic
motor incomplete SCI
8 SUN-13837 Asubio Pharmaceuticals / Daiichi Sankyo NCT01502631 IV drug SUN-13837 daily for 28d. vs. placebo (ASCENT-ASCI (Asubio Spinal Cord Early Neuro-recovery Treatment for Acute Spinal Cord Injury) 18-80 yr Age C4-C7 AIS A 16-70 yr Age C3-C8 AIS B, C LEMS ≤ 5 Acute SCI, SCI ≤ 12hr, 26wk F/U Began 1/2012
N. America / Europe
164 subjects
Phase 2
RCT
Double Blind
Placebo
Controlled
Efficacy/Safety
ISNCSCI examination
AIS A: 2 motor level improvement
AIS B, C: LEMS ≥ 40
Responder Definition:
AIS A: 2 Motor Level
Improvement
AIS B, C: LEMS ≥ 40
9 Hepatocyte Growth Factor Kringle Pharma, Inc. NCT02193334 IT injection of 0.6 mg Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) vs. placebo starting at 72hr post injury, the weekly x5 weeks 20-75 yr Age
SCI C4-C8
AIS A, B
Acute SCI
SCI ≤72hr
F/U 24wk
Began 6/2014
Japan
48 subjects
Phase 1/2
RCT
Placebo Controlled
Safety/Efficacy
Adverse Events
ASIA Motor Score Change 24wk
Study of intrathecal HGF vs. placebo given within 72 h then daily for 5 days
10 Buspirone + Levodopa + Carbidopa Nordic Life Science
Pipeline Inc.
NCT01484184
Oral dosing of buspirone +
levodopa + cardidopa (Spinalon™); vs. placebo
18-65 yr Age
SCI C3-T12
AIS A, B
Chronic SCI
SCI ≥ 3m
F/U 4hr post
administration
Began 7/2013
Canada
51 subjects
Phase 1/2
RCT
Double Blind
Placebo
Controlled
Safety/Tolerability
Vital Signs
Rhythmic Leg EMG
Multiple arms testing
SPINALON vs.
combination of drugs
vs. placebo
11 Ibuprofen Jan Schwab
Elise Kroner
Fresenius Foundation Charite University
NCT02096913
Ibuprofen (Dolormin® Extra) 2400 mg daily (800 mg 3 times per day) for 4 wks (6 subjects) or 12 wks (6 subjects) 18-65 yr Age
SCI C4-T4
AIS A, B
Acute SCI
4d ≤ SCI ≤ 21d
F/U 6m
Began 6/2014
Germany
12 subjects
Phase 1
Open Label
Safety/Efficacy
Severe Gastroduodenal Bleed
Modified Ashworth Scale
Neuropathic Pain Scale
ISNCSCI
Safety study of oral ibuprofen for 1 or 3 months in acute SCI also measuring ISNCSCI, spasticity and pain outcomes
12 Escitalopram Rehab Inst Chicago
(RIC)
NCT01753882
Escitalopram (Lexapro®) 10 mg PO Daily x 4 weeks vs Placebo in patients enrolled in gait training regimen (3x per wk for 6 wks—2 wks prior to initiation of study med, then 4 wks combined gait training and study med) 18-75 yr Age
SCI C1-T10
AIS C, D
1-9  m post SCI
Subacute/Chronic
1m ≤ SCI ≤ 9m
Began 2/2012
Chicago
88 subjects
Phase 1
Randomized
Double
Blinded
Crossover
Safety/Efficacy
WISCI
Peak Treadmill Velocity
6 Minute Walk
LEMS
Studying the
combined effects of
gait training and
escitalopram on motor
function and ↑ in
locomotor capability
13 Escitalopram Rehab Inst Chicago
(RIC)
NCT01788969
Active (Serotonergic Modulation: escitalopram (Lexapro®) crossover with cyproheptadine) vs. placebo in patients enrolled in gait training regimen 18-65 yr Age
SCI C5-T10
AIS C, D
SCI < 6 mos or SCI > 1yr
Subacute (<6mos) or Chronic (>1 yr) F/U 10-12wks Began 6/2005
Chicago
120 subjects
Phase 1
Randomized
Double
Blinded
Crossover
Safety/Efficacy
WISCI
Peak Treadmill Velocity
6 Minute Walk
LEMS
Studying the
effects of serotonergic modulation and gait training on motor function in subacute and chronic SCI
14 Escitalopram Rehab Inst Chicago
(RIC)
NCT01538693
Escitalopram (Lexapro®) vs. cyproheptadine, vs. placebo in patients participating in a graded treadmill exercise regimen 18-75 yr Age
SCI C1-T10
AIS C, D
SCI > 1yr
Chronic SCI
SCI > 12m
F/U 7days
Began 12/2011
Chicago
30 subjects
Phase not specified
Randomized
Double
Blinded
Crossover
Change in blood serum concentration of neuroplastic proteins
LEMS
Locomotion parameters
6 Minute Walk
Step acitivity monitor (7d) Modified Ashworth Scale
Studying the
effects of graded exercise and serotonergic modulation on blood biomarkers of neural plasticity, LE strenght, locomotion

ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; ISNCSCI, international standards for the neurological classification of spinal cord injury; SCIM, spinal cord injury measurement scale; FIM, functional independence measure; GRASSP, graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension; WISCI, walking index for spinal cord injury; LEMS, lower extremity motor score.

Therapeutics under investigation

Repurposing of older therapeutics approved for other indications and/or symptomatic relief, including generics, was common. Few novel, target-specific compounds were being studied in acute cervical SCI, due to greater potential clinical response compared to thoracic injury.3 While work continues in neuroprotection (specifically anti-inflammation), increasing focus involves strategies promoting neuronal regeneration and repair.

Active clinical trials in SCI

Table 1 summarizes the 14 clinical trials testing 11 potential therapeutics in clinical development for SCI. The proposed mechanism of action and route of administration of compounds in clinical development are outlined in Table 2.

Table 2. Current SCI therapeutic landscape (active clinical compounds).

Number Compound/Drug Name Global Status (all indications) Licensee/ Originator Mechanism Of Action Target Name Delivery Route Approach
  Phase I            
1 glyburide, Remedy Pharmaceuticals
glibenclamide, Remedy Pharmaceuticals
RP-1127
Phase II Remedy Pharmaceuticals ATP-sensitive potassium channel antagonist ATP-binding cassette, subfamily C (CFTR/MRP), member 8 Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection
2 MAP-4343 Phase II Mapreg Microtubule stabilizer microtubule-associated protein 2 Injectable, subcutaneous Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
3 GM-603 Phase I Genervon Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection and Neuroregeneration
4 ciclosporin A, iv, NeuroVive
CicloMulsion
NeuroSTAT
Phase III Sihuan Pharmaceutical; Maas BiolAB Apoptosis inhibitor peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection
5 Escitalopram (Lexapro®) Launched Forest Laboratories Antidepressant (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) somatodendritic 5-HT1A and terminal autoreceptors Oral Signal Enhancement
6 Ibuprofen (Dolormin® Extra) Launched McNeil GmbH & Co. oHG (Johnson & Johnson) Non-selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase cyclooxygenase Oral Anti-inflammatory
  Phase II            
7 BA-210
BA-210 + Tisseel
Cethrin™
Phase I/IIa BioAxone; Alseres Pharmaceuticals Rho-associated kinase inhibitor Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 Injectable, intraspinal Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
8 SUN-13837 Phase II Asubio; Daiichi Sankyo Fibroblast growth factor 2 agonist fibroblast growth factor 2 (basic) Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
9 AC-105
magnesium, Medtronic
magnesium, Acorda Therapeutics
Phase II Acorda Therapeutics; Medtronic Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection
10 buspirone + carbidopa + levodopa
Spinalon™
Phase II Nordic Life Science Pipeline 5 Hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor agonist
Dopamine receptor agonist
DOPA decarboxylase inhibitor
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 1A, G-protein-coupled
dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase)
Oral, swallowed Neuroprotection
11 hepatocyte growth factor, Kringle
ChronSeal
KP-100
rhHGF, Kringle
Phase II ChronTech Pharma; Kringle Pharma Hepatocyte growth factor agonist met proto-oncogene Injectable, intrathecal
Injectable, intravenous
Topical, skin
Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
  Phase III            
12 dalfampridine
4-aminopyridine
4-AP
Amaya
Ampyra®
Apriva
BIIB-041
EL970
fampridine
Fampyra
Neurelan
Launched Acorda Therapeutics
Biogen Idec
UCB; Elan
Potassium channel antagonist Unspecified Oral, swallowed Neuromodulation
13 Riluzole Launched Covis Pharmaceuticals Blockade of continuous posttraumatic activation of neuronal voltage gated Na+ channels Neuronal voltage gated Na+ channels Oral Neuroprotection
14 Minocycline Launched   Tetracycline antibiotic 30S bacterial ribosomal subunit Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection
15 Human Growth Hormone
somatotropin
Launched   Multiple therapeutic effects   subcutaneous Neuroprotection, Anti-inflammatory, Signal Enhancement
  Launched            
16 nabiximols
cannabinoids, GW Pharmaceuticals
GW-1000
GWP-42001
Sativex
tetranabinex/nabidiolex
THC:CBD
Launched GW Pharmaceuticals; Bayer
Almirall
Novartis
Otsuka
Ipsen
Cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist cannabinoid receptor 1 (brain) Oral, sublingual Neuromodulation
17 baclofen intrathecal
DL-404
Gabalon Intrathecal
Lioresal Intrathecal
Gablofen
Launched Daiichi Sankyo CNS Therapeutics; Medtronic GABA B receptor agonist gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1 Injectable, intraspinal
Injectable, intrathecal
Neuromodulation

Sources: Pharmaprojects® Citeline, Inc. drug pipeline monographs (last accessed May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies holding license to listed compounds.

Phase of development, type, and location of injury

Dogma holds that acute intervention holds greater probability for improving motor recovery; thus, potential therapeutics for acute SCI address motor outcomes, while potential treatments for chronic SCI predominantly focus on non-motor (e.g. bladder control) symptoms. Novel therapeutics under investigation (BA-210, SUN-13837, AC-105) target acute injury, while repurposed medications target the spectrum of SCI. Because cervical injuries a) are more common,4 b) result in greater disability,3 and c) may provide the lowest threshold for detecting efficacy, trials tend to favor acute cervical SCI. Severity of injury for study inclusion varies widely and is not correlated with acute or chronic status. Trials are in adults, i.e. ≥ 18 years, with one exception. No current trial information was available for 3 compounds in phase I development—MAP-4343, GM-603, and cyclosporine A.

Outcomes studied

Most primary outcomes incorporate the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) scores and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) scores.5 ISNCSCI defines neurological level of injury as the most caudal segment of the spinal cord with normal sensory and antigravity motor function on both sides of the body. AIS grades injury completeness: complete injury indicates loss of sensory or motor function below the neurological level.

Compounds in active clinical trials with prior clinical development

Riluzole6,7 and SUN-13837 [unpublished data]) are limited to safety and tolerability data; other compounds are noted below.

BA-210

The multi-dose phase I/IIa trial enrolled 48 patients with acute thoracic or cervical SCI (AIS A) to evaluate the efficacy of extradural doses during spine surgery performed within 5 days of injury.8 ISNCSCI motor scores at 12 months after injury were compared against baseline scores. The study found small changes in ISNCSCI motor scores across all dose groups in thoracic (1.8 ± 5.1) and cervical patients (18.6 ± 19.3). The largest change in motor score was observed in cervical patients treated with 3 mg of BA-210 (27.3 ± 13.3). Conversion from AIS A to AIS C or D occurred in 6% of thoracic patients, compared to 31% of cervical patients overall and 66% given 3 mg of BA-210. Notably, patients with cervical AIS Grade A injury are expected to improve by approximately 10 upper extremity motor score points during the first year after SCI.9

Minocycline

In phase II study,10 52 acute SCI patients received IV minocycline. Enrolled patients had AIS A-D injury or central cord injuries. Motor scores after cervical injury with treatment improved compared to placebo (33/100 vs 19/100 points). However, no improvement was seen after thoracic injury or in sensory scores in all groups.

Dalfampridine

In the 1990s, 4 small studies demonstrated mixed, but encouraging results that suggested potential improvement in neurologic outcomes in patients with chronic SCI.11–14 The subsequent phase II trial of dalfampridine used a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design, enrolling 91 patients with chronic (> 18 months after injury) traumatic AIS C or D injury of the C4-T10 cord.15 While no differences were found based on the ASIA International Standards, Ashworth Scale, Tendon Reflex Score, Spasm Frequency Score, and CGI, the Ashworth Scale did trend toward improvement in subjects with more marked levels of spasticity at baseline. However, follow-up phase III study found no difference in reducing spasticity in 415 patients.16 After FDA approval for improving walking in multiple sclerosis, a second phase II study of dalfampridine in SCI began in June of 2012 (5 years after publishing the previous phase II trial) that includes gait training.

Compounds in active clinical trials with prior preclinical development

Preclinical models, type, and location of injury

Preclinical studies of SCI are sufficiently recent to be relevant to 8 of the 11 therapeutics in active clinical development. All 8 programs used rodent models of SCI (both rat and mouse models17–25 and mouse-only26). Human HGF was also tested in non-human primates.27 Most of these studies involved contusive cord lesions between T8 and T10, from impactor used on exposed dura after laminectomy. This replicates the most common type of SCI in humans and is generally considered to be most clinically relevant.28

Outcomes studied

In most cases, the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) score was theprimary behavioral outcome measure in preclinical modelling. However, the BBB score is considered to have poor sensitivity.29 Small BBB score increases of 1.5-2 points may be viewed as therapeutic efficacy. Notably, spontaneous recovery of up to 6-15 points is common at 5 weeks after injury.30 Thus, rodent SCI models prediction of therapeutic response in humans remains a topic of considerable debate.28,31 For example, most murine models do not exhibit cord cavitation at the site of injury; humans do. Further, rodents have behavioral improvements after low thoracic spinal cord injury, whereas clinically significant improvement has not been demonstrated in patients.28

Non-human primate model

One case of common marmosets used to study human HGF is published.27 A novel behavioral rating scale with a maximum score of 20 was developed to evaluate motor function in the open field, including upper and lower limb weight-bearing, reach and grasp performance, somatosensory function, and trunk stability in a C5 contusive injury model. Force exerted during the animals’ gripping reflex, and spontaneous motor activity were also measured and compared to pre-injury values. Across all 3 measures, improvement was greater at 12 weeks after SCI in animals treated with HGF vs placebo. In open-field testing, animals in both groups gradually recovered, reaching a plateau around 8 weeks after SCI. Animals given HGF vs. placebo saw increases of 15.9 ± 0.8 vs. 7.8 ± 1.8 of upper limb weight-bearing, 62.4% ± 2.6% vs. 38.9% ± 4.3% of their bar-grip strength, and 77.8% ± 12.7% and 34.5% ± 10.9% of their spontaneous motor activity, respectively. Importantly, rodent studies were completed before the work began in non-human primates for this compound.

Compounds in preclinical development

Similar to clinical development, preclinical testing in SCI was limited, fragmented, and dominated by small biopharmaceutical companies, most of which had 1 preclinical SCI asset (see Table 3). Support for preclinical programs was largely commercial and military. Large pharmaceutical company activity was notably lacking; however, some companies, such as Novartis (Basel, Switzerland) and Daiichi Sankyo (Parsippany, NJ, USA), appear to leverage their existing pipeline, capabilities, and neurology franchises to approach traumatic spinal cord and brain injury via line extensions or repurposing.

Table 4. Current SCI therapeutic landscape (inactive compounds) - online supplement only.

Number Compound/Drug Name Global Status (all indications) Licensee/ Originator Mechanism Of Action Target Name Delivery Route Approach
1 ATI-355 No Development Reported Novartis Nogo receptor antagonist reticulon 4 Injectable, intrathecal Neuroprotection
2 monosialoganglioside GM-1, Amarin
GM-1 ganglioside, Amarin
Reflexan GM-1
Sygen
Launched Amarin Nerve growth factor agonist Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
3 arbaclofen placarbil
baclofen, XenoPort-2
R-baclofen prodrug, XenoPort
XP-19986
Discontinued XenoPort GABA B receptor agonist gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1 Oral, swallowed Neuromodulation
4 SB-509
AdV-ZFP-VEGF
ALS therapy, Sangamo
diabetic neuropathy therapy, Sangamo
VEGF activation, Sangamo-2
VEGF ZFP TF, Sangamo-2
Discontinued Sangamo BioSciences Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor agonist vascular endothelial growth factor A Injectable, intramuscular Neuroregeneration
5 apadenoson
ATL-146e
ATL-193
BMS-068645
DPC-A78445-00
DPH-068645-01
DWH-146e
Stedivaze
Discontinued Forest Laboratories; Lantheus Medical Imaging Adenosine A2a receptor agonist adenosine A2a receptor Injectable, intravenous Anti-inflammatory
6 tolperisone, Sanochemia
Agileo
AV-650
Mydocalm
SPH-3047
Viveo
Launched Orion Pharma;
MediciNova; Sanochemia Pharmazeutika
Voltage-gated sodium channel antagonist Unspecified Oral, swallowed Neuromodulation
7 CPC-211
Ceresine
sodium dichloroacetate
Discontinued Questcor Pyruvate dehydrogenase stimulant Unspecified Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection
8 CEP-075
CEP-075a
CEP-075b
trk agonists
trk antagonists
Discontinued Takeda; Teva Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)
Nerve growth factor agonist
Tyrosine kinase stimulant
Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
9 bcl-2, Neuro-Genesis No Development Reported Neuro-Genesis Bcl2 stimulant B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 Unspecified Neuroregeneration
10 LINGO-1 fusion protein, Biogen
LINGO-1-Fc antibody, Biogen
LINGO-1-Fc, Biogen
No Development Reported Biogen Idec; Dyax Nogo receptor antagonist Nogo-66 receptor/p75 signalling complex Unspecified Neuroprotection
11 Cordaneurin
nerve injury therapy, Neuraxo
No Development Reported SCT Spinal Cord Therapeutics Proline hydroxylase inhibitor prolyl 4-hydroxylase, alpha polypeptide I Injectable Neuroregeneration
12 BRX-220 No Development Reported CytRx Heat shock protein agonist heat shock protein 90 kDa alpha (cytosolic), class A member 1 Oral, swallowed Neuroprotection
13 spinal cord ther, Neuro Ther No Development Reported Neuro Therapeutics Complement factor stimulant Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
14 inosine, Alseres
Axosine
No Development Reported Alseres Pharmaceuticals Protein kinase stimulant Unspecified Injectable, intracerebral Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
15 Pharmaprojects No. 6411 No Development Reported Acorda Therapeutics; Athersys Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified High-throughput screening platform development
16 IC-486051
PDE inhibitors, Lilly
No Development Reported Eli Lilly Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor phosphodiesterase 4A, cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase 4C, cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific
Unspecified Neuroprotection
17 RARß2 gene ther, Oxford Bio
Cenurex
Innurex
neuropathy gene therapy,Oxford
Renurex
No Development Reported Oxford BioMedica Retinoic acid beta receptor agonist retinoic acid receptor, beta Unspecified Neuroregeneration
18 spinal cord gene therapy, AMT No Development Reported uniQure Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
19 poloxamer 188, purified-2, CytRx
CRL-1550
No Development Reported CytRx Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
20 spinal cord injury vacc, Weizm No Development Reported Yeda T cell stimulant Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
21 oligotropin
HF-0420 (oral)
oliogosaccharide C3
No Development Reported Access
Merrion Pharmaceuticals; Newron
Heparin stimulant Unspecified Injectable, subcutaneous
Oral
Neuroprotection
22 Pharmaprojects No. 4664 No Development Reported Non-industrial source Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
23 Pharmaprojects No. 5123 No Development Reported Pfizer Calpain inhibitor calpain 1, (mu/I) large subunit
calpain 2, (m/II) large subunit
Unspecified Neuroprotection
24 gacyclidine
GK-11
No Development Reported Ipsen NMDA antagonist glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 1 Unspecified Neuroprotection
25 Pharmaprojects No. 3017 No Development Reported Regeneron Immunostimulant Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
26 leteprinim potassium
AIT-082
Neotrofin
No Development Reported Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Nerve growth factor agonist
Neurotrophin-3 receptor agonist
Oxygenase stimulant
Unspecified Oral, swallowed Neuroregeneration
27 SS-701 No Development Reported Taisho Nerve growth factor agonist Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
28 SY-1200
neuroregenerative prog, Sygnis
No Development Reported Sygnis Pharma Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
29 COG-112
COG-68
No Development Reported Cognosci Apolipoprotein E stimulant apolipoprotein E Unspecified Neuroprotection
30 FK-1706 No Development Reported Astellas Unidentified pharmacological activity FK506 binding protein 4, 59kDa Oral Signal Enhancement
31 spinal cord therapy, Nanotope
Parkinson's therapy, Nanotope
stroke therapy, Nanotope
No Development Reported Nanotope Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration
32 anti-NogoR MAb, Teva No Development Reported Teva Nogo receptor antagonist reticulon 4 Unspecified Neuroprotection
33 guanabenz, AcurePharma No Development Reported AcurePharma Alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist adrenoceptor alpha 2A
adrenoceptor alpha 2B
Unspecified Neuroprotection
34 AX-201 No Development Reported Sygnis Pharma Granulocyte colony stimulating factor agonist colony stimulating factor 3 receptor (granulocyte) Unspecified Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration
35 nerve regeneration therapy, Sangamo No Development Reported Sangamo BioSciences Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
36 spinal cord injury therapy, Medipost
spinal cord injury therapy, Genexine
No Development Reported Medipost; Genexine Nerve growth factor agonist neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor, type 2 Unspecified Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration
37 STP-805 No Development Reported Sirnaomics Gene expression inhibitor Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
38 PT-00114 No Development Reported Protagenic Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
39 spinal cord injury therapy, ReveraGen Biopharma No Development Reported ReveraGen BioPharma Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
40 spinal cord injury therapy, Wintherix No Development Reported Samumed Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Injectable Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration
41 GTTI, Pharmaxon No Development Reported Pharmaxon Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
42 AIM-101 No Development Reported AIM Therapeutics Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Injectable, intravenous
Oral, swallowed
Anti-inflammatory
43 spinal cord injury ther, Thera No Development Reported Theralogics Transcription factor NF-kappaB inhibitor nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 Unspecified Neuroprotection
44 NVA-011 No Development Reported Neureva Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
45 spinal cord injury ther, Alnyl
spinal cord injury ther, Merck
No Development Reported Alnylam Nogo receptor antagonist Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
46 PR-21, Pharmaxon
cell mobility activator, Pharmaxon
CMA, Pharmaxon
PR-21C
PR-21S
No Development Reported Pharmaxon Neural cell adhesion molecule agonist neural cell adhesion molecule 1 Unspecified Neuroregeneration
47 Cordaneurin
nerve injury therapy, Neuraxo
No Development Reported SCT Spinal Cord Therapeutics Proline hydroxylase inhibitor prolyl 4-hydroxylase, alpha polypeptide I Injectable Neuroregeneration
48 BIO-182 No Development Reported Switch Pharma Nerve growth factor agonist Unspecified Injectable, intravenous Neuroregeneration
49 BIO-180 No Development Reported Switch Pharma Adenosine receptor agonist Unspecified Oral, swallowed Neuroprotection
50 CanCorda No Development Reported SCT Spinal Cord Therapeutics Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
51 Corda-Chron No Development Reported SCT Spinal Cord Therapeutics CXC chemokine receptor 4 agonist chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 Implant Neuroregeneration
52 antiangiogenics, Evotec
antiangiogenics, Genentech
No Development Reported Hoffmann-La Roche; Evotec Angiogenesis inhibitor Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
53 AX-207
AX-201/AX-207
No Development Reported Sygnis Pharma Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
54 AM-250
SCI therapy, AcurePharma
SCI therapy, AnaMar
No Development Reported AnaMar Medical; AcurePharma Melanocortin receptor agonist Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
55 neuroprotective, Cambridge No Development Reported Cambridge Enterprise Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
56 gap junc modulators, Zealand-3
spinal cord injury ther, Zea
No Development Reported Zealand Pharmaceuticals Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
57 L1, Acorda No Development Reported Acorda Therapeutics Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
58 spinal cord injury ther,Cortex No Development Reported Cortex Pharmaceuticals AMPA receptor agonist glutamate receptor, ionotropic, AMPA 1 Unspecified Neuroprotection
59 spinal cord injury ther, Parat No Development Reported Paratek Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
60 PHA-55 No Development Reported Pharma 21 Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
61 ALE-0014439 No Development Reported NPS Pharmaceuticals Glycine transporter 2 inhibitor solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter), member 5 Unspecified Neuromodulation
62 neuroprotectives, Medarex No Development Reported Bristol-Myers Squibb IP-10 antagonist chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 Injectable Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration
63 5HT1 receptor agonists, Dynog No Development Reported Dynogen 5 Hydroxytryptamine 1 receptor agonist Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
64 SRL NGF
neurotrophic growth factor, SR
No Development Reported Stratus Research Labs Nerve growth factor agonist Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
65 GCSF, Sygnis Pharma
AX-200
CSF-G, Sygnis Pharma
No Development Reported Sygnis Pharma Granulocyte colony stimulating factor agonist colony stimulating factor 3 receptor (granulocyte) Injectable, intravenous Neuroregeneration (neural plasticity)
66 NWL-53 No Development Reported New World Laboratories Caspase 3 inhibitor caspase 3, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase Unspecified Neuroprotection
67 neurodegenerative therapy, Nerve Access No Development Reported Nerve Access Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
68 RGS-2064 No Development Reported Regenesance Complement inhibitor Unspecified Unspecified Anti-inflammatory
69 chondroitin sulfate modulators, Zacharon
chondroitin sulfate modulators, Acorda Therapeutics
No Development Reported Acorda Therapeutics; Zacharon Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan inhibitor Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
70 spinal cord injury therapy, TRB Chemedica No Development Reported TRB Chemedica Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
71 retinoic acid, NANOEGG
Nanoegg
No Development Reported NANOEGG Retinoic acid receptor agonist Unspecified Transdermal Neuroprotection
72 NM-101
TBOC
No Development Reported NeuroMetrix Potassium channel antagonist Unspecified Unspecified Signal Enhancement
73 GSK-249320 Phase II GlaxoSmithKline Myelin associated glycoprotein antagonist myelin associated glycoprotein Injectable
Injectable, intravenous
Neuroprotection
74 DF-2156A Phase II Dompe CXC chemokine receptor 1 antagonist
CXC chemokine receptor 2 antagonist
chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 1
chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2
Oral, swallowed Neuroprotection
75 glatiramer acetate
7-copaxone
COP-1
Copaxone
Copolymer-1
Launched Teva
Sanofi
Takeda
Proneuron Biotechnologies; Yeda
Myelin basic protein stimulant myelin basic protein Injectable, subcutaneous Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration
76 TRO-40303
TRO-040303
TRO-40X03
Phase II Trophos Apoptosis inhibitor Unspecified Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection
77 cyclosporin A, to-BBB
2B3-301
NVP-014
stroke therapy, NeuroVive
stroke therapy, to-BBB
Preclinical Maas BiolAB; to-BBB Cyclophilin D inhibitor
T cell inhibitor
Immunosuppressant
peptidylprolyl isomerase D Unspecified Neuroprotection, Anti-inflammatory
78 AIM-102 Phase II AIM Therapeutics Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Oral, swallowed Anti-inflammatory
79 dexanabinol
ETS-2101
HU-211
PRS-211092
PRS-211095
PRS-211220
Phase I e-Therapeutics; Pharmos NMDA antagonist
Transcription factor NF-kappaB inhibitor
Reducing agent
Apoptosis stimulant
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 1
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1
Injectable, intravenous
Ophthalmological
Oral, swallowed
Topical
Neuromodulation
80 cutamesine dihydrochloride
AGY-94806
Msc-1
SA-4503
No Development Reported AGY Therapeutics; M's Science Sigma 1 receptor agonist sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1 Oral Neuroregeneration
81 bcl-2, Neuro-Genesis No Development Reported Neuro-Genesis Bcl2 stimulant B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 Unspecified Neuroregeneration
82 F-spondin
floor plate factor-5
FPF-5
No Development Reported Paion Nerve growth factor agonist spondin 1, extracellular matrix protein Unspecified Neuroregeneration
83 FG-001 No Development Reported F-Gene Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
84 GRI-2
ALX-1393
ALX-1405
GlyT-2 inhibs, Allelix
No Development Reported NPS Pharmaceuticals Glycine transporter 2 inhibitor solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter), member 5 Injectable Neuromodulation
85 axogenesis factor-1
AF-1, Alseres
No Development Reported Alseres Pharmaceuticals Nerve growth factor agonist Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
86 cimaglermin alfa
GGF2, Acorda
GGF2, Paion
glial growth factor-2, Paion
neuregulin-1 gene product,Paio
rhGGF2
Phase I Acorda Therapeutics
Bayer Paion
Growth factor receptor agonist neuregulin 1 Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration
87 DP-b99 Phase II D-Pharm; Yungjin
Wanbang Biopharmaceuticals
Hypocalcaemic agent
Apoptosis inhibitor
Chelating agent
Unspecified Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection
88 TissueGene-N
KLS-Nst
TG-N
No Development Reported Kolon Life Sciences; TissueGene Bone morphogenetic protein stimulant
Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic growth factor agonist
glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor Injectable Neuroprotection

Sources: Pharmaprojects® Citeline, Inc. drug pipeline monographs (last accessed May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies holding license to listed compounds.

Table 3. Current SCI therapeutic landscape (active preclinical compounds).

Number Compound/Drug Name Global Status (all indications) Licensee/ Originator Mechanism Of Action Target Name Delivery Route Approach
1 Oxycyte Phase II Aurum Biosciences; Oxygen Biotherapeutics Not applicable Not applicable Injectable, intravenous
Topical
Neuroprotection
2 SLx-2119
KD 025
ROCK2 inhibitors, Nano Terra-1
ROCK2 inhibitors, Surface Logix-1
Phase II Kadmon Pharmaceuticals; Nano Terra Rho-associated kinase 2 inhibitor Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 Oral, swallowed Neuroprotection
3 LPA-181 Preclinical Lipopharma Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
4 MDNA-11 Preclinical Medicenna Therapeutics Apoptosis stimulant interleukin 4 receptor Injectable Neuroprotection
5 becaplermin + ß-tricalcium phosphate, BioMimetic-3
Augment Injectable Bone Graft
becaplermin + ß-TCP, BioMimetic-3
becaplermin + ß-TCP/collagen matrix, becaplermin + ß-tricalcium phosphate/collagen matrix, BioMimetic
GEM-OS2
rhPDGF-BB + ß-TCP, BioMimetic-3
rhPDGF-BB + ß-TCP/collagen matrix, BioMimetic
rhPDGF-BB + ß-tricalcium phosphate, BioMimetic-3
rhPDGF-BB + ß-tricalcium phosphate/collagen matrix
Pre-registration BioMimetic Platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor agonist platelet-derived growth factor receptor, beta polypeptide Implant
Injectable
Neuroprotection
6 chondroitinase, Acorda Therapeutics
matrix modifiers, Acorda Therapeutics
Preclinical Acorda Therapeutics N Acetylgalactosamine 4 sulfatase stimulant Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
7 anti-semaphorin 3A antiboby, Chiome Bioscience Preclinical Chiome Bioscience Semaphorin antagonist sema domain, immunoglobulin domain (Ig), short basic domain, secreted, (semaphorin) 3A Injectable Anti-inflammatory, Neuroprotection
8 SC-0806
FGF1, BioArctic Neuroscience
Preclinical BioArctic Neuroscience Fibroblast growth factor 1 agonist fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 Unspecified Neuroregeneration
9 SY-300 Preclinical Sygnis Pharma Apoptosis inhibitor Unspecified Unspecified Neuroregeneration
10 NX-210 Preclinical Neuronax Unidentified pharmacological activity Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection
11 Nogo receptor, Axerion Therapeutics, NgR(310)ecto-Fc Preclinical Axerion Therapeutics Nogo receptor antagonist reticulon 4 Unspecified Neuroprotection
12 rhIgM22
M1 MAbs, Acorda Therapeutics
M22
Phase I Acorda Therapeutics Immunostimulant Unspecified Injectable, intravenous Neuroregeneration (remyelination), Signal Enhancement
13 C-21, Vicore
compound-21, Vicore
Preclinical Vicore Pharma Angiotensin II agonist Unspecified Unspecified Neuroprotection, Anti-inflammatory, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity)
14 AP-325 Preclinical Algiax Pharmaceuticals Immunosuppressant
DNA synthesis inhibitor
Unspecified Unspecified Anti-inflammatory
15 Neu-2000
Neu-2000KL
Safaprodil
Phase I JW Pharmaceutical;
Simcere Pharmaceuticals; Global Neurotech (GNT) Pharma
Reducing agent
NMDA antagonist
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 1 Injectable, intravenous Neuroprotection
16 anticancer MAb, Lpath
Lpathomab
Preclinical Lpath Angiogenesis inhibitor Injectable Not applicable Neuroprotection
17 rolipram
Adeo
ME-3167
ZK-62711
No Development Reported Meiji; Bayer/Miami Project Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor
Interleukin 1b antagonist
phosphodiesterase 4A, cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase 4C, cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific
Oral Neuroprotection, Anti-inflammatory
18 LM11A-31
p75 ligands, PharmatrophiX
  Elan inhibits proNGF binding to p75 after spinal cord injury   Oral Neuroprotection

Sources: Pharmaprojects® Citeline, Inc. drug pipeline monographs (last accessed May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies holding license to listed compounds.

Mechanism of action, route of administration

All preclinical SCI compounds are novel molecules. Most are designed to promote neuroprotective, neuroregenerative, and anti-inflammatory responses, while only a few are under investigation for neuromodulation or signal enhancement (see Table 3).

Ongoing preclinical development of current preclinical compounds

Preclinical studies reporting outcomes were available for 10 compounds currently under preclinical investigation in SCI.

Preclinical models, type, and location of injury

Preclinical studies were performed in rat models exclusively for 5 compounds,32–36 in mouse models exclusively for 4 compounds,37–40 and in both rat and mouse models for 1 compound.41 Most injuries were contusive of low- to mid-thoracic cord, although cervical injury and cord hemi-section models were also used. Reported outcomes in rat studies were based primarily on the BBB score (with improvements of approximately 2-4.5/21 points), while the Basso Mouse Scale42 score (improvement of 2.5/9 points) and the modified BBB score (improvement of 4/14 points) were used primarily in mouse studies.

Compounds no longer in development

Although terminated programs might offer significant insight, information about compounds no longer in development was not readily available. In most cases, the reason for terminating is unclear but may include reevaluation of strategic focus or lack of funding. The vast majority of these compounds were novel therapeutics targeting neuroprotection. The remaining targeted neuroregeneration, or a combination of neuroprotection and neuroregeneration. Mechanisms of action varied widely with significant overlap with current programs.

Only 2 compounds have available information related to development termination (see Supplemental Table 4). Novartis halted research on ATI-355, a Nogo receptor antagonist. In 13 rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys subjected to cervical cord hemisection, manual dexterity improved after treatment with ATI-355.43 However, results of the phase I trial (NCT00406016) were never published for unclear reasons. Christopher Reeve notably developed an anaphylactic reaction to monosialoganglioside GM-1 (Sygen), which failed to meet primary endpoints in a phase III trial.44–46 A 2009 Cochrane review of the phase II47 and phase III44–46 trials found that poor study design and analyses precluded drawing meaningful conclusions about recovery.48

Conclusion on the current R&D and commercial landscape

In providing systematic evaluation of recent R&D activity, this review is not an exhaustive analysis of every experiment or study conducted on all candidate molecules for SCI. Also, while it does not address which model or approach is most promising, this review identified trends and gaps that may influence future development and investment priorities. The pipeline has been hamstrung by significant heterogeneity of modelling, study design, and outcome assessment. Most SCI programs continue to focus on motor improvement by targeting disease-modifying mechanisms, i.e. interfering injury potentiation or enhancing repair processes. However, non-motor symptoms remain significant challenges for patients.49 As understanding of repair and regeneration mechanisms has increased, treatment window may expand beyond acute injury to weeks after SCI, requiring new study designs and offering options for combination therapies. In contrast to disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, that focus on a limited number of targets, a wide array of mechanisms and approaches are being pursued for SCI. This is a reflection of the complex nature of SCI, relative disparity in research funding to identify key mediators of injury and recovery, and lack of universally accepted preclinical modelling. Finally changing demographics and aging of the US population will require further refinement of trial design and appropriate outcome selection. Studies to determine predictive reliability in other species, such as non-human primates and miniature pigs, and across the age spectrum would inform future trial design and decisions to enter clinical trials.2,50 Progress in the development of models, outcomes, and potential therapeutics rely on federal funding, patient advocacy groups, and scientific collaboration.51

Future outlook and directions

The direction of R&D for SCI treatments will continue to be driven by 1) patient need, 2) the opportunity to reduce cost of care and loss of productivity, and 3) emerging scientific and technological breakthroughs, such as nanomedicine, specific tissue targeting, cell therapies, and precision medicine. The complexity of SCI suggests that clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes will rely on selective, appropriately timed modulation of vascular, immune, growth, repair, and other signalling pathways;52–55 however, combination therapy will be challenging.56,57 Emerging drug formulation and delivery technologies will improve pharmacokinetics and -dynamics through blood-spinal cord barrier and scar tissue.58,59 Collective contributions of traditional R&D, increased transparency and data mining (e.g. Visualized Syndromic Information and Outcomes for Neurotrauma-SCI),60 implementation of patient registries (e.g. Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry),61 and development of data standards for clinical research (e.g. NINDS SCI Common Data Elements)62 will be essential. Advances in the prevention of injury, neurocritical care, rehabilitation, biomaterials, and devices will also play a key role in future pharmacotherapy. However, until breakthrough in understanding the biology mediating SCI injury and recovery occurs, risk-averse companies will likely leverage repurposed molecules from non-SCI indications engaging SCI-relevant pathways.

Disclaimer statements

Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest related to any of the compounds described in the manuscript.

ORCID

Michael L. Jameshttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-5210

References

  • 1.Dasari VR, Veeravalli KK, Dinh DH.. Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injuries: A review. World J Stem Cells 2014;6(2):120–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Navarro R, Juhas S, Keshavarzi S, Juhasova J, Motlik J, Johe K, et al. Chronic spinal compression model in minipigs: a systematic behavioral, qualitative, and quantitative neuropathological study. J Neurotrauma 2012;29(3):499–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Molinari M.. Distribution-based estimates of clinically significant changes in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor and sensory scores. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013;49(3):373–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG.. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S2–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ditunno JF Jr., Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G.. The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Paraplegia 1994;32(2):70–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chow DS, Teng Y, Toups EG, Aarabi B, Harrop JS, Shaffrey CI, et al. Pharmacology of riluzole in acute spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;17(1 Suppl):129–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grossman RG, Fehlings MG, Frankowski RF, Burau KD, Chow DS, Tator C, et al. A prospective, multicenter, phase I matched-comparison group trial of safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of riluzole in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2014;31(3):239–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fehlings MG, Theodore N, Harrop J, Maurais G, Kuntz C, Shaffrey CI, et al. A phase I/IIa clinical trial of a recombinant Rho protein antagonist in acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2011;28(5):787–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Steeves JD, Lammertse DP, Kramer JL, Kleitman N, Kalsi-Ryan S, Jones L, et al. Outcome Measures for Acute/Subacute Cervical Sensorimotor Complete (AIS-A) Spinal Cord Injury During a Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012;18(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Casha S, Zygun D, McGowan MD, Bains I, Yong VW, Hurlbert RJ.. Results of a phase II placebo-controlled randomized trial of minocycline in acute spinal cord injury. Brain 2012;135(Pt 4):1224–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hansebout RR, Blight AR, Fawcett S, Reddy K.. 4-Aminopyridine in chronic spinal cord injury: a controlled, double-blind, crossover study in eight patients. J Neurotrauma 1993;10(1):1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hayes KC, Blight AR, Potter PJ, Allatt RD, Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL, et al. Preclinical trial of 4-aminopyridine in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1993;31(4):216–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hayes KC, Potter PJ, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JT, Delaney GA, Blight AR.. 4-Aminopyridine-sensitive neurologic deficits in patients with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 1994;11(4):433–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Potter PJ, Hayes KC, Segal JL, Hsieh JT, Brunnemann SR, Delaney GA, et al. Randomized double-blind crossover trial of fampridine-SR (sustained release 4-aminopyridine) in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 1998;15(10):837–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cardenas DD, Ditunno J, Graziani V, Jackson AB, Lammertse D, Potter P, et al. Phase 2 trial of sustained-release fampridine in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal cord 2007;45(2):158–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cardenas DD, Ditunno JF, Graziani V, McLain AB, Lammertse DP, Potter PJ, et al. Two phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of fampridine-SR for treatment of spasticity in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal cord 2014;52(1):70–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lord-Fontaine S, Yang F, Diep Q, Dergham P, Munzer S, Tremblay P, et al. Local inhibition of Rho signaling by cell-permeable recombinant protein BA-210 prevents secondary damage and promotes functional recovery following acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2008;25(11):1309–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rabchevsky AG, Fugaccia I, Turner AF, Blades DA, Mattson MP, Scheff SW.. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) enhances functional recovery following severe spinal cord injury to the rat. Exp Neurol 2000;164(2):280–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee JH, Roy J, Sohn HM, Cheong M, Liu J, Stammers AT, et al. Magnesium in a polyethylene glycol formulation provides neuroprotection after unilateral cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 2010;35(23):2041–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ditor DS, John SM, Roy J, Marx JC, Kittmer C, Weaver LC.. Effects of polyethylene glycol and magnesium sulfate administration on clinically relevant neurological outcomes after spinal cord injury in the rat. J Neurosci Res 2007;85(7):1458–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ates O, Cayli SR, Gurses I, Turkoz Y, Tarim O, Cakir CO, et al. Comparative neuroprotective effect of sodium channel blockers after experimental spinal cord injury. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14(7):658–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yune TY, Lee JY, Jung GY, Kim SJ, Jiang MH, Kim YC, et al. Minocycline alleviates death of oligodendrocytes by inhibiting pro-nerve growth factor production in microglia after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2007;27(29):7751–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kitamura K, Iwanami A, Nakamura M, Yamane J, Watanabe K, Suzuki Y, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor promotes endogenous repair and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res 2007;85(11):2332–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang X, Budel S, Baughman K, Gould G, Song KH, Strittmatter SM.. Ibuprofen enhances recovery from spinal cord injury by limiting tissue loss and stimulating axonal growth. J Neurotrauma 2009;26(1):81–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fu Q, Hue J, Li S.. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs promote axon regeneration via RhoA inhibition. J Neurosci 2007;27(15):4154–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guertin PA, Ung RV, Rouleau P.. Oral administration of a tri-therapy for central pattern generator activation in paraplegic mice: proof-of-concept of efficacy. Biotechnol J 2010;5(4):421–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kitamura K, Fujiyoshi K, Yamane J, Toyota F, Hikishima K, Nomura T, et al. Human hepatocyte growth factor promotes functional recovery in primates after spinal cord injury. PloS one 2011;6(11):e27706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Geissler SA, Schmidt CE, Schallert T.. Rodent Models and Behavioral Outcomes of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. J Spine 2013;Suppl 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barros Filho TE, Molina AE.. Analysis of the sensitivity and reproducibility of the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) scale in Wistar rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2008;63(1):103–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC.. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma 1995;12(1):1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Metz GA, Curt A, van de Meent H, Klusman I, Schwab ME, Dietz V.. Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a comparative study of human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2000;17(1):1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bradbury EJ, Moon LD, Popat RJ, King VR, Bennett GS, Patel PN, et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 2002;416(6881):636–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nordblom J, Persson JK, Aberg J, Blom H, Engqvist H, Brismar H, et al. FGF1 containing biodegradable device with peripheral nerve grafts induces corticospinal tract regeneration and motor evoked potentials after spinal cord resection. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2012;30(2):91–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sakka L, Deletage N, Lalloue F, Duval A, Chazal J, Lemaire JJ, et al. SCO-spondin derived peptide NX210 induces neuroprotection in vitro and promotes fiber regrowth and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. PloS one 2014;9(3):e93179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Springer JE, Rao RR, Lim HR, Cho SI, Moon GJ, Lee HY, et al. The functional and neuroprotective actions of Neu2000, a dual-acting pharmacological agent, in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2010;27(1):139–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Costa LM, Pereira JE, Filipe VM, Magalhaes LG, Couto PA, Gonzalo-Orden JM, et al. Rolipram promotes functional recovery after contusive thoracic spinal cord injury in rats. Behav Brain Res 2013;243:66–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Warrington AE, Bieber AJ, Ciric B, Pease LR, Van Keulen V, Rodriguez M.. A recombinant human IgM promotes myelin repair after a single, very low dose. J Neurosci Res 2007;85(5):967–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Namsolleck P, Boato F, Schwengel K, Paulis L, Matho KS, Geurts N, et al. AT2-receptor stimulation enhances axonal plasticity after spinal cord injury by upregulating BDNF expression. Neurobiol Dis 2013;51:177–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Goldshmit Y, Matteo R, Sztal T, Ellett F, Frisca F, Moreno K, et al. Blockage of lysophosphatidic acid signaling improves spinal cord injury outcomes. Am J Pathol 2012;181(3):978–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tep C, Lim TH, Ko PO, Getahun S, Ryu JC, Goettl VM, et al. Oral administration of a small molecule targeted to block proNGF binding to p75 promotes myelin sparing and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2013;33(2):397–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang X, Duffy P, McGee AW, Hasan O, Gould G, Tu N, et al. Recovery from chronic spinal cord contusion after Nogo receptor intervention. Ann Neurol 2011;70(5):805–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Basso DM, Fisher LC, Anderson AJ, Jakeman LB, McTigue DM, Popovich PG.. Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains. J Neurotrauma 2006;23(5):635–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Freund P, Schmidlin E, Wannier T, Bloch J, Mir A, Schwab ME, et al. Anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment promotes recovery of manual dexterity after unilateral cervical lesion in adult primates--re-examination and extension of behavioral data. Eur J Neurosci 2009;29(5):983–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D.. The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S87–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D.. Measurements and recovery patterns in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S68–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D.. Recruitment and early treatment in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S58–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Geisler FH, Dorsey FC, Coleman WP.. Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury--a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside. N Engl J Med 1991;324(26):1829–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chinnock P, Roberts I.. Gangliosides for acute spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(2):CD004444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL.. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012;29(8):1548–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cheriyan T, Ryan DJ, Weinreb JH, Cheriyan J, Paul JC, Lafage V, et al. Spinal cord injury models: a review. Spinal cord 2014;52(8):588–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Steeves JD, Lammertse D, Curt A, Fawcett JW, Tuszynski MH, Ditunno JF, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures. Spinal cord 2007;45(3):206–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen G, Zhang Z, Wang S, Lv D.. Combined treatment with FK506 and nerve growth factor for spinal cord injury in rats. Exp Ther Med 2013;6(4):868–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhao X, Yao GS, Liu Y, Wang J, Satkunendrarajah K, Fehlings M.. The role of neural precursor cells and self assembling peptides in nerve regeneration. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;42:60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gerin CG, Madueke IC, Perkins T, Hill S, Smith K, Haley B, et al. Combination strategies for repair, plasticity, and regeneration using regulation of gene expression during the chronic phase after spinal cord injury. Synapse 2011;65(12):1255–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mestre H, Alkon T, Salazar S, Ibarra A.. Spinal cord injury sequelae alter drug pharmacokinetics: an overview. Spinal cord 2011;49(9):955–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mountney A, Zahner MR, Sturgill ER, Riley CJ, Aston JW, Oudega M, et al. Sialidase, chondroitinase ABC, and combination therapy after spinal cord contusion injury. J Neurotrauma 2013;30(3):181–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Streijger F, Lee JH, Duncan GJ, Ng MT, Assinck P, Bhatnagar T, et al. Combinatorial treatment of acute spinal cord injury with ghrelin, ibuprofen, C16, and ketogenic diet does not result in improved histologic or functional outcome. J Neurosci Res 2014;92(7):870–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Caron I, Papa S, Rossi F, Forloni G, Veglianese P.. Nanovector-mediated drug delivery for spinal cord injury treatment. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2014;6(5):506–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kumar P, Choonara YE, Modi G, Naidoo D, Pillay V.. Nanoparticulate strategies for the five R's of traumatic spinal cord injury intervention: restriction, repair, regeneration, restoration and reorganization. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2014;9(2):331–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nielson JL, Guandique CF, Liu AW, Burke DA, Lash AT, Moseanko R, et al. Development of a database for translational spinal cord injury research. J Neurotrauma 2014;31(21):1789–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Noonan VK, Kwon BK, Soril L, Fehlings MG, Hurlbert RJ, Townson A, et al. The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry. Spinal cord 2012;50(1):22–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, Devivo MJ, Grinnon ST, Kleitman N, Lu Y, et al. Using the Spinal Cord Injury Common Data Elements. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012;18(1):23–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES