Abstract
Context
Current treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) focuses on cord stabilization to prevent further injury, rehabilitation, management of non-motor symptoms, and prevention of complications. Currently, no approved treatments are available, and limited treatment options exist for symptoms and complications associated with chronic SCI. This review describes the pharmacotherapy landscape in SCI from both commercial and research and development (R&D) standpoints through March 2015.
Methods
Information about specific compounds has been obtained through drug pipeline monographs in the Pharmaprojects® (Citeline, Inc., New York, New York, USA) drug database (current as of a search on May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies with compounds in development for SCI (current as of March 24, 2015), and a literature search of published R&D studies to validate the Pharmaprojects® source for selected compounds (current as of March 24, 2015).
Results
Types of studies conducted and outcomes measured in earlier phases of development are described for compounds in clinical development Currently four primary mechanisms are under investigation and may yield promising therapeutic targets: 1) neuronal regeneration; 2) neuroprotection (including anti-inflammation); 3) axonal reconnection; and 4) neuromodulation and signal enhancement. Many other compounds are no longer under investigation for SCI are mentioned; however, in most cases, the reason for terminating their development is not clear.
Conclusion
There is urgent need to develop disease-modifying therapy for SCI, yet the commercial landscape remains small and highly fragmented with a paucity of novel late-stage compounds in R&D.
Key words: Spinal cord injury, Pharmacotherapy, Clinical trials
Introduction
In the United States, approximately 17,500 new spinal cord injuries (SCI) are reported each year with an estimated 285,000 Americans currently experiencing consequences of SCI (http://www.msktc.org/lib/docs/Data_Sheets_/SCIMS_Facts_and_Figures_2017_August_FINAL.pdf). Current treatment focuses on cord stabilization to prevent further injury, rehabilitation, management of non-motor symptoms, and prevention of complications. Urgent need to develop disease-modifying therapy for SCI exists.
Describing pharmacotherapy landscape in SCI from both commercial and research and development (R&D) standpoints, this review will focus on small-molecule and biologics. Studies and outcomes measured in early development and compounds no longer under investigation will be mentioned. While stem cell therapies account for considerable research investment, recent excellent reviews already exist, and detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this reivew.1
Information about specific compounds has been obtained through drug pipeline monographs in the Pharmaprojects® (Citeline, Inc., New York, New York, USA) drug database (current as of a search on May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies with compounds in development for SCI (current as of March 24, 2015), and a literature search of published R&D studies to validate the Pharmaprojects® source for selected compounds (current as of March 24, 2015). Information on current clinical trials in SCI is current as of October 2, 2014. The purpose of this report is to provide a frame of reference to understand the obstacles and successes related to SCI therapeutic development and as a historical perspective of the SCI landscape as of 2015.
Compounds in clinical development
No established commercial leader exists for SCI clinical development (see Table 1) with balanced funding mix from academic institutions, small start-up companies holding compound licenses, private foundation, federal (Department of Defense, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, and Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center), and license-holding company sources. Many funding agencies support preclinical programs with traditional models but are increasingly investing in experimental model organisms, such as non-human primates and miniature pigs.2 Acorda Therapeutics, Inc., (Ardsley, New York, USA) was the only company with more than one program in clinical development for SCI. Notable lack of large pharmaceutical company activity existed.
Table 1. Current SCI clinical trials for interventions to improve neurologic function adapted from Spinal Cord Outcomes Partnership Endeavor (SCOPE) available at www.scope-sci.org (last accessed December 29, 2014).
| Number | Compound | Sponsor/NCT | Intervention | Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria | Treatment Timing & Follow-up | Enrollment | Phase of Study | Primary Outcome | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minocycline | Rick Hansen Institute U of Calgary Alberta Paraplegic Foundation NCT01828203 |
Twice Daily IV Minocycline vs. Placebo for over seven days All patients receive decompressive spine surgery and blood pressure management per protocol |
≥16 yr Age SCI C0-C8 AIS A, B, C, D |
Acute SCI SCI ≤ 12 hours F/U 12m |
Began 6/2013 Canada 248 subjects |
Phase 3 RCT |
Efficacy/Safety ISNCSCI Motor Score recovery from baseline to examination between 3 m and 1 yr post injury; ISNCSCI Sensory Scores AIS; SCIM; QoL: SF-36 |
800 mg initial dose tapered 100 mg each dose to 400 mg then continued twice daily x 7days |
| 2 | Minocycline | Hadassah Medical Org NCT01813240 |
Minocycline vs. Placebo; dose and route of administration not specified | 18-65 yr Age SCI: AIS B, C, D Spinal Tumors causing cord compression |
Not Specified: Treatment Initiation Treatment Duration F/U Duration |
Not begun Israel 444 subjects |
Phase2/3 RCT |
Efficacy/Safety ASIA score (ISNCSCI) comparison from baseline to 6 months follow-up; SCIM, FIM |
Prevention of Imminent Paralysis Following Spinal Cord Trauma or Ischemia by Minocycline |
| 3 | Human Growth Hormone | Hospital Nacional de Paraplejicos de Toledo (Spain) NCT01329757 |
Daily SQ Human Growth Hormone vs placebo dosing for 1 yr; 6 months of rehab | 18-75 yr Age SCI C4-T12 AIS B,C |
Chronic SCI >18 m SCI 1 yr F/U |
Began 4/2011 Spain 76 subjects |
Phase 3 RCT Placebo Controlled |
Efficacy/Safety ISNCSCI motor sensory examination; SCIM |
Test of 1 yr of daily SQ Growth Hormone to improve neuro outcome in chronic incomplete |
| 4 | Riluzole | AOSpine N. Am Research Network NCT01597518 |
Riluzole 2 × 100 mg by mouth or feeding tube the first 24 hours followed by 2 × 50 mg for the following 13 days after injury vs. placebo in acute SCI | 18-75 yr Age SCI C4-C8 AIS A, B, C |
Acute SCI SCI ≤ 12 hours F/U 6m |
Began 8/2013 N. America Multicenter 351 subjects |
Phase 2/3 RCT Double-Blind |
Efficacy/Safety Change in ISNCSCI total motor score from baseline to 6 months of F/U |
Multicenter Phase2/ 3 trial of riluzole vs. placebo for improving motor recovery in acute SCI |
| 5 | BA-210 | Bioaxone Biosciences NCT02053883 |
3 mg or 6 mg of BA-210 (Cethrin™) vs. Placebo administered extradurally in a fibrin sealant during spinal decompression/stabilization surgery | 18-62 yr Age SCI C4-5 AIS A, B |
Acute SCI SCI ≤ 5 days F/U 6m |
Not yet recruiting US and Canada Enrollment target not specified |
Phase 2 Placebo Controlled RCT |
ISNCSCI UE Motor Score Other ISNCSCI parameters SCIM, GRASSP |
Phase 2 trial of Cethrin vs. Placebo administered during clinical spinal surgery in acute SCI |
| 6 | AC-105 | Acorda Therapeutics NCT01750684 |
IV study med every 6 hrs x 6; AC-105 vs. Placebo; i.e. 6 doses over 30 hours | 18-65 yr Age SCI C4-T11 AIS A, B, C |
Acute SCI SCI ≤ 12hr F/U 6 m |
Began 7/2013 Enrolling By Invitation Only N. America 40 Subjects |
Phase 2 RCT |
Safety/Tolerability: comparison of Adverse Event data between groups | Study to determine safety, tolerability and potential activity of AC105 |
| 7 | Dalfampridine | Kessler Foundation; NIDRR; Acorda Therapeutics NCT01621113 |
Oral dalfampridine (Sustained release 4-aminopyridine) vs. placebo for 10 weeks in chronic motor incomplete SCI receiving locomotor therapy |
18-70 yr Age SCI C4-T10 AIS C, D |
Chronic SCI SCI > 12m F/U 22wks |
Began 6/2012 New Jersey 46 subjects |
Phase 2 RCT Double-Blind |
Change in 6 minute walk test at 10 weeks and 22 weeks F/U | Test of whether dalfampridine improves walking outcomes in chronic motor incomplete SCI |
| 8 | SUN-13837 | Asubio Pharmaceuticals / Daiichi Sankyo NCT01502631 | IV drug SUN-13837 daily for 28d. vs. placebo (ASCENT-ASCI (Asubio Spinal Cord Early Neuro-recovery Treatment for Acute Spinal Cord Injury) | 18-80 yr Age C4-C7 AIS A 16-70 yr Age C3-C8 AIS B, C LEMS ≤ 5 | Acute SCI, SCI ≤ 12hr, 26wk F/U | Began 1/2012 N. America / Europe 164 subjects |
Phase 2 RCT Double Blind Placebo Controlled |
Efficacy/Safety ISNCSCI examination AIS A: 2 motor level improvement AIS B, C: LEMS ≥ 40 |
Responder Definition: AIS A: 2 Motor Level Improvement AIS B, C: LEMS ≥ 40 |
| 9 | Hepatocyte Growth Factor | Kringle Pharma, Inc. NCT02193334 | IT injection of 0.6 mg Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) vs. placebo starting at 72hr post injury, the weekly x5 weeks | 20-75 yr Age SCI C4-C8 AIS A, B |
Acute SCI SCI ≤72hr F/U 24wk |
Began 6/2014 Japan 48 subjects |
Phase 1/2 RCT Placebo Controlled |
Safety/Efficacy Adverse Events ASIA Motor Score Change 24wk |
Study of intrathecal HGF vs. placebo given within 72 h then daily for 5 days |
| 10 | Buspirone + Levodopa + Carbidopa | Nordic Life Science Pipeline Inc. NCT01484184 |
Oral dosing of buspirone + levodopa + cardidopa (Spinalon™); vs. placebo |
18-65 yr Age SCI C3-T12 AIS A, B |
Chronic SCI SCI ≥ 3m F/U 4hr post administration |
Began 7/2013 Canada 51 subjects |
Phase 1/2 RCT Double Blind Placebo Controlled |
Safety/Tolerability Vital Signs Rhythmic Leg EMG |
Multiple arms testing SPINALON vs. combination of drugs vs. placebo |
| 11 | Ibuprofen | Jan Schwab Elise Kroner Fresenius Foundation Charite University NCT02096913 |
Ibuprofen (Dolormin® Extra) 2400 mg daily (800 mg 3 times per day) for 4 wks (6 subjects) or 12 wks (6 subjects) | 18-65 yr Age SCI C4-T4 AIS A, B |
Acute SCI 4d ≤ SCI ≤ 21d F/U 6m |
Began 6/2014 Germany 12 subjects |
Phase 1 Open Label |
Safety/Efficacy Severe Gastroduodenal Bleed Modified Ashworth Scale Neuropathic Pain Scale ISNCSCI |
Safety study of oral ibuprofen for 1 or 3 months in acute SCI also measuring ISNCSCI, spasticity and pain outcomes |
| 12 | Escitalopram | Rehab Inst Chicago (RIC) NCT01753882 |
Escitalopram (Lexapro®) 10 mg PO Daily x 4 weeks vs Placebo in patients enrolled in gait training regimen (3x per wk for 6 wks—2 wks prior to initiation of study med, then 4 wks combined gait training and study med) | 18-75 yr Age SCI C1-T10 AIS C, D 1-9 m post SCI |
Subacute/Chronic 1m ≤ SCI ≤ 9m |
Began 2/2012 Chicago 88 subjects |
Phase 1 Randomized Double Blinded Crossover |
Safety/Efficacy WISCI Peak Treadmill Velocity 6 Minute Walk LEMS |
Studying the combined effects of gait training and escitalopram on motor function and ↑ in locomotor capability |
| 13 | Escitalopram | Rehab Inst Chicago (RIC) NCT01788969 |
Active (Serotonergic Modulation: escitalopram (Lexapro®) crossover with cyproheptadine) vs. placebo in patients enrolled in gait training regimen | 18-65 yr Age SCI C5-T10 AIS C, D SCI < 6 mos or SCI > 1yr |
Subacute (<6mos) or Chronic (>1 yr) F/U 10-12wks | Began 6/2005 Chicago 120 subjects |
Phase 1 Randomized Double Blinded Crossover |
Safety/Efficacy WISCI Peak Treadmill Velocity 6 Minute Walk LEMS |
Studying the effects of serotonergic modulation and gait training on motor function in subacute and chronic SCI |
| 14 | Escitalopram | Rehab Inst Chicago (RIC) NCT01538693 |
Escitalopram (Lexapro®) vs. cyproheptadine, vs. placebo in patients participating in a graded treadmill exercise regimen | 18-75 yr Age SCI C1-T10 AIS C, D SCI > 1yr |
Chronic SCI SCI > 12m F/U 7days |
Began 12/2011 Chicago 30 subjects |
Phase not specified Randomized Double Blinded Crossover |
Change in blood serum concentration of neuroplastic proteins LEMS Locomotion parameters 6 Minute Walk Step acitivity monitor (7d) Modified Ashworth Scale |
Studying the effects of graded exercise and serotonergic modulation on blood biomarkers of neural plasticity, LE strenght, locomotion |
ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; ISNCSCI, international standards for the neurological classification of spinal cord injury; SCIM, spinal cord injury measurement scale; FIM, functional independence measure; GRASSP, graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension; WISCI, walking index for spinal cord injury; LEMS, lower extremity motor score.
Therapeutics under investigation
Repurposing of older therapeutics approved for other indications and/or symptomatic relief, including generics, was common. Few novel, target-specific compounds were being studied in acute cervical SCI, due to greater potential clinical response compared to thoracic injury.3 While work continues in neuroprotection (specifically anti-inflammation), increasing focus involves strategies promoting neuronal regeneration and repair.
Active clinical trials in SCI
Table 1 summarizes the 14 clinical trials testing 11 potential therapeutics in clinical development for SCI. The proposed mechanism of action and route of administration of compounds in clinical development are outlined in Table 2.
Table 2. Current SCI therapeutic landscape (active clinical compounds).
| Number | Compound/Drug Name | Global Status (all indications) | Licensee/ Originator | Mechanism Of Action | Target Name | Delivery Route | Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase I | |||||||
| 1 | glyburide, Remedy Pharmaceuticals glibenclamide, Remedy Pharmaceuticals RP-1127 |
Phase II | Remedy Pharmaceuticals | ATP-sensitive potassium channel antagonist | ATP-binding cassette, subfamily C (CFTR/MRP), member 8 | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection |
| 2 | MAP-4343 | Phase II | Mapreg | Microtubule stabilizer | microtubule-associated protein 2 | Injectable, subcutaneous | Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 3 | GM-603 | Phase I | Genervon | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection and Neuroregeneration |
| 4 | ciclosporin A, iv, NeuroVive CicloMulsion NeuroSTAT |
Phase III | Sihuan Pharmaceutical; Maas BiolAB | Apoptosis inhibitor | peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection |
| 5 | Escitalopram (Lexapro®) | Launched | Forest Laboratories | Antidepressant (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) | somatodendritic 5-HT1A and terminal autoreceptors | Oral | Signal Enhancement |
| 6 | Ibuprofen (Dolormin® Extra) | Launched | McNeil GmbH & Co. oHG (Johnson & Johnson) | Non-selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase | cyclooxygenase | Oral | Anti-inflammatory |
| Phase II | |||||||
| 7 | BA-210 BA-210 + Tisseel Cethrin™ |
Phase I/IIa | BioAxone; Alseres Pharmaceuticals | Rho-associated kinase inhibitor | Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 | Injectable, intraspinal | Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 8 | SUN-13837 | Phase II | Asubio; Daiichi Sankyo | Fibroblast growth factor 2 agonist | fibroblast growth factor 2 (basic) | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 9 | AC-105 magnesium, Medtronic magnesium, Acorda Therapeutics |
Phase II | Acorda Therapeutics; Medtronic | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection |
| 10 | buspirone + carbidopa + levodopa Spinalon™ |
Phase II | Nordic Life Science Pipeline | 5 Hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor agonist Dopamine receptor agonist DOPA decarboxylase inhibitor |
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 1A, G-protein-coupled dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) |
Oral, swallowed | Neuroprotection |
| 11 | hepatocyte growth factor, Kringle ChronSeal KP-100 rhHGF, Kringle |
Phase II | ChronTech Pharma; Kringle Pharma | Hepatocyte growth factor agonist | met proto-oncogene | Injectable, intrathecal Injectable, intravenous Topical, skin |
Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| Phase III | |||||||
| 12 | dalfampridine 4-aminopyridine 4-AP Amaya Ampyra® Apriva BIIB-041 EL970 fampridine Fampyra Neurelan |
Launched | Acorda Therapeutics Biogen Idec UCB; Elan |
Potassium channel antagonist | Unspecified | Oral, swallowed | Neuromodulation |
| 13 | Riluzole | Launched | Covis Pharmaceuticals | Blockade of continuous posttraumatic activation of neuronal voltage gated Na+ channels | Neuronal voltage gated Na+ channels | Oral | Neuroprotection |
| 14 | Minocycline | Launched | Tetracycline antibiotic | 30S bacterial ribosomal subunit | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection | |
| 15 | Human Growth Hormone somatotropin |
Launched | Multiple therapeutic effects | subcutaneous | Neuroprotection, Anti-inflammatory, Signal Enhancement | ||
| Launched | |||||||
| 16 | nabiximols cannabinoids, GW Pharmaceuticals GW-1000 GWP-42001 Sativex tetranabinex/nabidiolex THC:CBD |
Launched | GW Pharmaceuticals; Bayer Almirall Novartis Otsuka Ipsen |
Cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist | cannabinoid receptor 1 (brain) | Oral, sublingual | Neuromodulation |
| 17 | baclofen intrathecal DL-404 Gabalon Intrathecal Lioresal Intrathecal Gablofen |
Launched | Daiichi Sankyo CNS Therapeutics; Medtronic | GABA B receptor agonist | gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1 | Injectable, intraspinal Injectable, intrathecal |
Neuromodulation |
Sources: Pharmaprojects® Citeline, Inc. drug pipeline monographs (last accessed May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies holding license to listed compounds.
Phase of development, type, and location of injury
Dogma holds that acute intervention holds greater probability for improving motor recovery; thus, potential therapeutics for acute SCI address motor outcomes, while potential treatments for chronic SCI predominantly focus on non-motor (e.g. bladder control) symptoms. Novel therapeutics under investigation (BA-210, SUN-13837, AC-105) target acute injury, while repurposed medications target the spectrum of SCI. Because cervical injuries a) are more common,4 b) result in greater disability,3 and c) may provide the lowest threshold for detecting efficacy, trials tend to favor acute cervical SCI. Severity of injury for study inclusion varies widely and is not correlated with acute or chronic status. Trials are in adults, i.e. ≥ 18 years, with one exception. No current trial information was available for 3 compounds in phase I development—MAP-4343, GM-603, and cyclosporine A.
Outcomes studied
Most primary outcomes incorporate the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) scores and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) scores.5 ISNCSCI defines neurological level of injury as the most caudal segment of the spinal cord with normal sensory and antigravity motor function on both sides of the body. AIS grades injury completeness: complete injury indicates loss of sensory or motor function below the neurological level.
Compounds in active clinical trials with prior clinical development
Riluzole6,7 and SUN-13837 [unpublished data]) are limited to safety and tolerability data; other compounds are noted below.
BA-210
The multi-dose phase I/IIa trial enrolled 48 patients with acute thoracic or cervical SCI (AIS A) to evaluate the efficacy of extradural doses during spine surgery performed within 5 days of injury.8 ISNCSCI motor scores at 12 months after injury were compared against baseline scores. The study found small changes in ISNCSCI motor scores across all dose groups in thoracic (1.8 ± 5.1) and cervical patients (18.6 ± 19.3). The largest change in motor score was observed in cervical patients treated with 3 mg of BA-210 (27.3 ± 13.3). Conversion from AIS A to AIS C or D occurred in 6% of thoracic patients, compared to 31% of cervical patients overall and 66% given 3 mg of BA-210. Notably, patients with cervical AIS Grade A injury are expected to improve by approximately 10 upper extremity motor score points during the first year after SCI.9
Minocycline
In phase II study,10 52 acute SCI patients received IV minocycline. Enrolled patients had AIS A-D injury or central cord injuries. Motor scores after cervical injury with treatment improved compared to placebo (33/100 vs 19/100 points). However, no improvement was seen after thoracic injury or in sensory scores in all groups.
Dalfampridine
In the 1990s, 4 small studies demonstrated mixed, but encouraging results that suggested potential improvement in neurologic outcomes in patients with chronic SCI.11–14 The subsequent phase II trial of dalfampridine used a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design, enrolling 91 patients with chronic (> 18 months after injury) traumatic AIS C or D injury of the C4-T10 cord.15 While no differences were found based on the ASIA International Standards, Ashworth Scale, Tendon Reflex Score, Spasm Frequency Score, and CGI, the Ashworth Scale did trend toward improvement in subjects with more marked levels of spasticity at baseline. However, follow-up phase III study found no difference in reducing spasticity in 415 patients.16 After FDA approval for improving walking in multiple sclerosis, a second phase II study of dalfampridine in SCI began in June of 2012 (5 years after publishing the previous phase II trial) that includes gait training.
Compounds in active clinical trials with prior preclinical development
Preclinical models, type, and location of injury
Preclinical studies of SCI are sufficiently recent to be relevant to 8 of the 11 therapeutics in active clinical development. All 8 programs used rodent models of SCI (both rat and mouse models17–25 and mouse-only26). Human HGF was also tested in non-human primates.27 Most of these studies involved contusive cord lesions between T8 and T10, from impactor used on exposed dura after laminectomy. This replicates the most common type of SCI in humans and is generally considered to be most clinically relevant.28
Outcomes studied
In most cases, the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) score was theprimary behavioral outcome measure in preclinical modelling. However, the BBB score is considered to have poor sensitivity.29 Small BBB score increases of 1.5-2 points may be viewed as therapeutic efficacy. Notably, spontaneous recovery of up to 6-15 points is common at 5 weeks after injury.30 Thus, rodent SCI models prediction of therapeutic response in humans remains a topic of considerable debate.28,31 For example, most murine models do not exhibit cord cavitation at the site of injury; humans do. Further, rodents have behavioral improvements after low thoracic spinal cord injury, whereas clinically significant improvement has not been demonstrated in patients.28
Non-human primate model
One case of common marmosets used to study human HGF is published.27 A novel behavioral rating scale with a maximum score of 20 was developed to evaluate motor function in the open field, including upper and lower limb weight-bearing, reach and grasp performance, somatosensory function, and trunk stability in a C5 contusive injury model. Force exerted during the animals’ gripping reflex, and spontaneous motor activity were also measured and compared to pre-injury values. Across all 3 measures, improvement was greater at 12 weeks after SCI in animals treated with HGF vs placebo. In open-field testing, animals in both groups gradually recovered, reaching a plateau around 8 weeks after SCI. Animals given HGF vs. placebo saw increases of 15.9 ± 0.8 vs. 7.8 ± 1.8 of upper limb weight-bearing, 62.4% ± 2.6% vs. 38.9% ± 4.3% of their bar-grip strength, and 77.8% ± 12.7% and 34.5% ± 10.9% of their spontaneous motor activity, respectively. Importantly, rodent studies were completed before the work began in non-human primates for this compound.
Compounds in preclinical development
Similar to clinical development, preclinical testing in SCI was limited, fragmented, and dominated by small biopharmaceutical companies, most of which had 1 preclinical SCI asset (see Table 3). Support for preclinical programs was largely commercial and military. Large pharmaceutical company activity was notably lacking; however, some companies, such as Novartis (Basel, Switzerland) and Daiichi Sankyo (Parsippany, NJ, USA), appear to leverage their existing pipeline, capabilities, and neurology franchises to approach traumatic spinal cord and brain injury via line extensions or repurposing.
Table 4. Current SCI therapeutic landscape (inactive compounds) - online supplement only.
| Number | Compound/Drug Name | Global Status (all indications) | Licensee/ Originator | Mechanism Of Action | Target Name | Delivery Route | Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ATI-355 | No Development Reported | Novartis | Nogo receptor antagonist | reticulon 4 | Injectable, intrathecal | Neuroprotection |
| 2 | monosialoganglioside GM-1, Amarin GM-1 ganglioside, Amarin Reflexan GM-1 Sygen |
Launched | Amarin | Nerve growth factor agonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 3 | arbaclofen placarbil baclofen, XenoPort-2 R-baclofen prodrug, XenoPort XP-19986 |
Discontinued | XenoPort | GABA B receptor agonist | gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1 | Oral, swallowed | Neuromodulation |
| 4 | SB-509 AdV-ZFP-VEGF ALS therapy, Sangamo diabetic neuropathy therapy, Sangamo VEGF activation, Sangamo-2 VEGF ZFP TF, Sangamo-2 |
Discontinued | Sangamo BioSciences | Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor agonist | vascular endothelial growth factor A | Injectable, intramuscular | Neuroregeneration |
| 5 | apadenoson ATL-146e ATL-193 BMS-068645 DPC-A78445-00 DPH-068645-01 DWH-146e Stedivaze |
Discontinued | Forest Laboratories; Lantheus Medical Imaging | Adenosine A2a receptor agonist | adenosine A2a receptor | Injectable, intravenous | Anti-inflammatory |
| 6 | tolperisone, Sanochemia Agileo AV-650 Mydocalm SPH-3047 Viveo |
Launched | Orion Pharma; MediciNova; Sanochemia Pharmazeutika |
Voltage-gated sodium channel antagonist | Unspecified | Oral, swallowed | Neuromodulation |
| 7 | CPC-211 Ceresine sodium dichloroacetate |
Discontinued | Questcor | Pyruvate dehydrogenase stimulant | Unspecified | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection |
| 8 | CEP-075 CEP-075a CEP-075b trk agonists trk antagonists |
Discontinued | Takeda; Teva | Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Nerve growth factor agonist Tyrosine kinase stimulant |
Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 9 | bcl-2, Neuro-Genesis | No Development Reported | Neuro-Genesis | Bcl2 stimulant | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 10 | LINGO-1 fusion protein, Biogen LINGO-1-Fc antibody, Biogen LINGO-1-Fc, Biogen |
No Development Reported | Biogen Idec; Dyax | Nogo receptor antagonist | Nogo-66 receptor/p75 signalling complex | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 11 | Cordaneurin nerve injury therapy, Neuraxo |
No Development Reported | SCT Spinal Cord Therapeutics | Proline hydroxylase inhibitor | prolyl 4-hydroxylase, alpha polypeptide I | Injectable | Neuroregeneration |
| 12 | BRX-220 | No Development Reported | CytRx | Heat shock protein agonist | heat shock protein 90 kDa alpha (cytosolic), class A member 1 | Oral, swallowed | Neuroprotection |
| 13 | spinal cord ther, Neuro Ther | No Development Reported | Neuro Therapeutics | Complement factor stimulant | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 14 | inosine, Alseres Axosine |
No Development Reported | Alseres Pharmaceuticals | Protein kinase stimulant | Unspecified | Injectable, intracerebral | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 15 | Pharmaprojects No. 6411 | No Development Reported | Acorda Therapeutics; Athersys | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | High-throughput screening platform development |
| 16 | IC-486051 PDE inhibitors, Lilly |
No Development Reported | Eli Lilly | Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor | phosphodiesterase 4A, cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4C, cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific |
Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 17 | RARß2 gene ther, Oxford Bio Cenurex Innurex neuropathy gene therapy,Oxford Renurex |
No Development Reported | Oxford BioMedica | Retinoic acid beta receptor agonist | retinoic acid receptor, beta | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 18 | spinal cord gene therapy, AMT | No Development Reported | uniQure | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 19 | poloxamer 188, purified-2, CytRx CRL-1550 |
No Development Reported | CytRx | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 20 | spinal cord injury vacc, Weizm | No Development Reported | Yeda | T cell stimulant | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 21 | oligotropin HF-0420 (oral) oliogosaccharide C3 |
No Development Reported | Access Merrion Pharmaceuticals; Newron |
Heparin stimulant | Unspecified | Injectable, subcutaneous Oral |
Neuroprotection |
| 22 | Pharmaprojects No. 4664 | No Development Reported | Non-industrial source | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 23 | Pharmaprojects No. 5123 | No Development Reported | Pfizer | Calpain inhibitor | calpain 1, (mu/I) large subunit calpain 2, (m/II) large subunit |
Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 24 | gacyclidine GK-11 |
No Development Reported | Ipsen | NMDA antagonist | glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 1 | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 25 | Pharmaprojects No. 3017 | No Development Reported | Regeneron | Immunostimulant | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 26 | leteprinim potassium AIT-082 Neotrofin |
No Development Reported | Spectrum Pharmaceuticals | Nerve growth factor agonist Neurotrophin-3 receptor agonist Oxygenase stimulant |
Unspecified | Oral, swallowed | Neuroregeneration |
| 27 | SS-701 | No Development Reported | Taisho | Nerve growth factor agonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 28 | SY-1200 neuroregenerative prog, Sygnis |
No Development Reported | Sygnis Pharma | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 29 | COG-112 COG-68 |
No Development Reported | Cognosci | Apolipoprotein E stimulant | apolipoprotein E | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 30 | FK-1706 | No Development Reported | Astellas | Unidentified pharmacological activity | FK506 binding protein 4, 59kDa | Oral | Signal Enhancement |
| 31 | spinal cord therapy, Nanotope Parkinson's therapy, Nanotope stroke therapy, Nanotope |
No Development Reported | Nanotope | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration |
| 32 | anti-NogoR MAb, Teva | No Development Reported | Teva | Nogo receptor antagonist | reticulon 4 | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 33 | guanabenz, AcurePharma | No Development Reported | AcurePharma | Alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist | adrenoceptor alpha 2A adrenoceptor alpha 2B |
Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 34 | AX-201 | No Development Reported | Sygnis Pharma | Granulocyte colony stimulating factor agonist | colony stimulating factor 3 receptor (granulocyte) | Unspecified | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration |
| 35 | nerve regeneration therapy, Sangamo | No Development Reported | Sangamo BioSciences | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 36 | spinal cord injury therapy, Medipost spinal cord injury therapy, Genexine |
No Development Reported | Medipost; Genexine | Nerve growth factor agonist | neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor, type 2 | Unspecified | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration |
| 37 | STP-805 | No Development Reported | Sirnaomics | Gene expression inhibitor | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 38 | PT-00114 | No Development Reported | Protagenic | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 39 | spinal cord injury therapy, ReveraGen Biopharma | No Development Reported | ReveraGen BioPharma | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 40 | spinal cord injury therapy, Wintherix | No Development Reported | Samumed | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Injectable | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration |
| 41 | GTTI, Pharmaxon | No Development Reported | Pharmaxon | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 42 | AIM-101 | No Development Reported | AIM Therapeutics | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Injectable, intravenous Oral, swallowed |
Anti-inflammatory |
| 43 | spinal cord injury ther, Thera | No Development Reported | Theralogics | Transcription factor NF-kappaB inhibitor | nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 44 | NVA-011 | No Development Reported | Neureva | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 45 | spinal cord injury ther, Alnyl spinal cord injury ther, Merck |
No Development Reported | Alnylam | Nogo receptor antagonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 46 | PR-21, Pharmaxon cell mobility activator, Pharmaxon CMA, Pharmaxon PR-21C PR-21S |
No Development Reported | Pharmaxon | Neural cell adhesion molecule agonist | neural cell adhesion molecule 1 | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 47 | Cordaneurin nerve injury therapy, Neuraxo |
No Development Reported | SCT Spinal Cord Therapeutics | Proline hydroxylase inhibitor | prolyl 4-hydroxylase, alpha polypeptide I | Injectable | Neuroregeneration |
| 48 | BIO-182 | No Development Reported | Switch Pharma | Nerve growth factor agonist | Unspecified | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroregeneration |
| 49 | BIO-180 | No Development Reported | Switch Pharma | Adenosine receptor agonist | Unspecified | Oral, swallowed | Neuroprotection |
| 50 | CanCorda | No Development Reported | SCT Spinal Cord Therapeutics | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 51 | Corda-Chron | No Development Reported | SCT Spinal Cord Therapeutics | CXC chemokine receptor 4 agonist | chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 | Implant | Neuroregeneration |
| 52 | antiangiogenics, Evotec antiangiogenics, Genentech |
No Development Reported | Hoffmann-La Roche; Evotec | Angiogenesis inhibitor | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 53 | AX-207 AX-201/AX-207 |
No Development Reported | Sygnis Pharma | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 54 | AM-250 SCI therapy, AcurePharma SCI therapy, AnaMar |
No Development Reported | AnaMar Medical; AcurePharma | Melanocortin receptor agonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 55 | neuroprotective, Cambridge | No Development Reported | Cambridge Enterprise | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 56 | gap junc modulators, Zealand-3 spinal cord injury ther, Zea |
No Development Reported | Zealand Pharmaceuticals | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 57 | L1, Acorda | No Development Reported | Acorda Therapeutics | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 58 | spinal cord injury ther,Cortex | No Development Reported | Cortex Pharmaceuticals | AMPA receptor agonist | glutamate receptor, ionotropic, AMPA 1 | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 59 | spinal cord injury ther, Parat | No Development Reported | Paratek | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 60 | PHA-55 | No Development Reported | Pharma 21 | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 61 | ALE-0014439 | No Development Reported | NPS Pharmaceuticals | Glycine transporter 2 inhibitor | solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter), member 5 | Unspecified | Neuromodulation |
| 62 | neuroprotectives, Medarex | No Development Reported | Bristol-Myers Squibb | IP-10 antagonist | chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 | Injectable | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration |
| 63 | 5HT1 receptor agonists, Dynog | No Development Reported | Dynogen | 5 Hydroxytryptamine 1 receptor agonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 64 | SRL NGF neurotrophic growth factor, SR |
No Development Reported | Stratus Research Labs | Nerve growth factor agonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 65 | GCSF, Sygnis Pharma AX-200 CSF-G, Sygnis Pharma |
No Development Reported | Sygnis Pharma | Granulocyte colony stimulating factor agonist | colony stimulating factor 3 receptor (granulocyte) | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroregeneration (neural plasticity) |
| 66 | NWL-53 | No Development Reported | New World Laboratories | Caspase 3 inhibitor | caspase 3, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 67 | neurodegenerative therapy, Nerve Access | No Development Reported | Nerve Access | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 68 | RGS-2064 | No Development Reported | Regenesance | Complement inhibitor | Unspecified | Unspecified | Anti-inflammatory |
| 69 | chondroitin sulfate modulators, Zacharon chondroitin sulfate modulators, Acorda Therapeutics |
No Development Reported | Acorda Therapeutics; Zacharon | Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan inhibitor | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 70 | spinal cord injury therapy, TRB Chemedica | No Development Reported | TRB Chemedica | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 71 | retinoic acid, NANOEGG Nanoegg |
No Development Reported | NANOEGG | Retinoic acid receptor agonist | Unspecified | Transdermal | Neuroprotection |
| 72 | NM-101 TBOC |
No Development Reported | NeuroMetrix | Potassium channel antagonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Signal Enhancement |
| 73 | GSK-249320 | Phase II | GlaxoSmithKline | Myelin associated glycoprotein antagonist | myelin associated glycoprotein | Injectable Injectable, intravenous |
Neuroprotection |
| 74 | DF-2156A | Phase II | Dompe | CXC chemokine receptor 1 antagonist CXC chemokine receptor 2 antagonist |
chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 1 chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 |
Oral, swallowed | Neuroprotection |
| 75 | glatiramer acetate 7-copaxone COP-1 Copaxone Copolymer-1 |
Launched | Teva Sanofi Takeda Proneuron Biotechnologies; Yeda |
Myelin basic protein stimulant | myelin basic protein | Injectable, subcutaneous | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration |
| 76 | TRO-40303 TRO-040303 TRO-40X03 |
Phase II | Trophos | Apoptosis inhibitor | Unspecified | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection |
| 77 | cyclosporin A, to-BBB 2B3-301 NVP-014 stroke therapy, NeuroVive stroke therapy, to-BBB |
Preclinical | Maas BiolAB; to-BBB | Cyclophilin D inhibitor T cell inhibitor Immunosuppressant |
peptidylprolyl isomerase D | Unspecified | Neuroprotection, Anti-inflammatory |
| 78 | AIM-102 | Phase II | AIM Therapeutics | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Oral, swallowed | Anti-inflammatory |
| 79 | dexanabinol ETS-2101 HU-211 PRS-211092 PRS-211095 PRS-211220 |
Phase I | e-Therapeutics; Pharmos | NMDA antagonist Transcription factor NF-kappaB inhibitor Reducing agent Apoptosis stimulant |
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 1 nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 |
Injectable, intravenous Ophthalmological Oral, swallowed Topical |
Neuromodulation |
| 80 | cutamesine dihydrochloride AGY-94806 Msc-1 SA-4503 |
No Development Reported | AGY Therapeutics; M's Science | Sigma 1 receptor agonist | sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1 | Oral | Neuroregeneration |
| 81 | bcl-2, Neuro-Genesis | No Development Reported | Neuro-Genesis | Bcl2 stimulant | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 82 | F-spondin floor plate factor-5 FPF-5 |
No Development Reported | Paion | Nerve growth factor agonist | spondin 1, extracellular matrix protein | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 83 | FG-001 | No Development Reported | F-Gene | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 84 | GRI-2 ALX-1393 ALX-1405 GlyT-2 inhibs, Allelix |
No Development Reported | NPS Pharmaceuticals | Glycine transporter 2 inhibitor | solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter), member 5 | Injectable | Neuromodulation |
| 85 | axogenesis factor-1 AF-1, Alseres |
No Development Reported | Alseres Pharmaceuticals | Nerve growth factor agonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 86 | cimaglermin alfa GGF2, Acorda GGF2, Paion glial growth factor-2, Paion neuregulin-1 gene product,Paio rhGGF2 |
Phase I | Acorda Therapeutics Bayer Paion |
Growth factor receptor agonist | neuregulin 1 | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration |
| 87 | DP-b99 | Phase II | D-Pharm; Yungjin Wanbang Biopharmaceuticals |
Hypocalcaemic agent Apoptosis inhibitor Chelating agent |
Unspecified | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection |
| 88 | TissueGene-N KLS-Nst TG-N |
No Development Reported | Kolon Life Sciences; TissueGene | Bone morphogenetic protein stimulant Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic growth factor agonist |
glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor | Injectable | Neuroprotection |
Sources: Pharmaprojects® Citeline, Inc. drug pipeline monographs (last accessed May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies holding license to listed compounds.
Table 3. Current SCI therapeutic landscape (active preclinical compounds).
| Number | Compound/Drug Name | Global Status (all indications) | Licensee/ Originator | Mechanism Of Action | Target Name | Delivery Route | Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oxycyte | Phase II | Aurum Biosciences; Oxygen Biotherapeutics | Not applicable | Not applicable | Injectable, intravenous Topical |
Neuroprotection |
| 2 | SLx-2119 KD 025 ROCK2 inhibitors, Nano Terra-1 ROCK2 inhibitors, Surface Logix-1 |
Phase II | Kadmon Pharmaceuticals; Nano Terra | Rho-associated kinase 2 inhibitor | Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 | Oral, swallowed | Neuroprotection |
| 3 | LPA-181 | Preclinical | Lipopharma | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 4 | MDNA-11 | Preclinical | Medicenna Therapeutics | Apoptosis stimulant | interleukin 4 receptor | Injectable | Neuroprotection |
| 5 | becaplermin + ß-tricalcium phosphate, BioMimetic-3 Augment Injectable Bone Graft becaplermin + ß-TCP, BioMimetic-3 becaplermin + ß-TCP/collagen matrix, becaplermin + ß-tricalcium phosphate/collagen matrix, BioMimetic GEM-OS2 rhPDGF-BB + ß-TCP, BioMimetic-3 rhPDGF-BB + ß-TCP/collagen matrix, BioMimetic rhPDGF-BB + ß-tricalcium phosphate, BioMimetic-3 rhPDGF-BB + ß-tricalcium phosphate/collagen matrix |
Pre-registration | BioMimetic | Platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor agonist | platelet-derived growth factor receptor, beta polypeptide | Implant Injectable |
Neuroprotection |
| 6 | chondroitinase, Acorda Therapeutics matrix modifiers, Acorda Therapeutics |
Preclinical | Acorda Therapeutics | N Acetylgalactosamine 4 sulfatase stimulant | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 7 | anti-semaphorin 3A antiboby, Chiome Bioscience | Preclinical | Chiome Bioscience | Semaphorin antagonist | sema domain, immunoglobulin domain (Ig), short basic domain, secreted, (semaphorin) 3A | Injectable | Anti-inflammatory, Neuroprotection |
| 8 | SC-0806 FGF1, BioArctic Neuroscience |
Preclinical | BioArctic Neuroscience | Fibroblast growth factor 1 agonist | fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 9 | SY-300 | Preclinical | Sygnis Pharma | Apoptosis inhibitor | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroregeneration |
| 10 | NX-210 | Preclinical | Neuronax | Unidentified pharmacological activity | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 11 | Nogo receptor, Axerion Therapeutics, NgR(310)ecto-Fc | Preclinical | Axerion Therapeutics | Nogo receptor antagonist | reticulon 4 | Unspecified | Neuroprotection |
| 12 | rhIgM22 M1 MAbs, Acorda Therapeutics M22 |
Phase I | Acorda Therapeutics | Immunostimulant | Unspecified | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroregeneration (remyelination), Signal Enhancement |
| 13 | C-21, Vicore compound-21, Vicore |
Preclinical | Vicore Pharma | Angiotensin II agonist | Unspecified | Unspecified | Neuroprotection, Anti-inflammatory, Neuroregeneration (axonal plasticity) |
| 14 | AP-325 | Preclinical | Algiax Pharmaceuticals | Immunosuppressant DNA synthesis inhibitor |
Unspecified | Unspecified | Anti-inflammatory |
| 15 | Neu-2000 Neu-2000KL Safaprodil |
Phase I | JW Pharmaceutical; Simcere Pharmaceuticals; Global Neurotech (GNT) Pharma |
Reducing agent NMDA antagonist |
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 1 | Injectable, intravenous | Neuroprotection |
| 16 | anticancer MAb, Lpath Lpathomab |
Preclinical | Lpath | Angiogenesis inhibitor | Injectable | Not applicable | Neuroprotection |
| 17 | rolipram Adeo ME-3167 ZK-62711 |
No Development Reported | Meiji; Bayer/Miami Project | Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor Interleukin 1b antagonist |
phosphodiesterase 4A, cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4C, cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific |
Oral | Neuroprotection, Anti-inflammatory |
| 18 | LM11A-31 p75 ligands, PharmatrophiX |
Elan | inhibits proNGF binding to p75 after spinal cord injury | Oral | Neuroprotection |
Sources: Pharmaprojects® Citeline, Inc. drug pipeline monographs (last accessed May 30, 2014), websites of individual companies holding license to listed compounds.
Mechanism of action, route of administration
All preclinical SCI compounds are novel molecules. Most are designed to promote neuroprotective, neuroregenerative, and anti-inflammatory responses, while only a few are under investigation for neuromodulation or signal enhancement (see Table 3).
Ongoing preclinical development of current preclinical compounds
Preclinical studies reporting outcomes were available for 10 compounds currently under preclinical investigation in SCI.
Preclinical models, type, and location of injury
Preclinical studies were performed in rat models exclusively for 5 compounds,32–36 in mouse models exclusively for 4 compounds,37–40 and in both rat and mouse models for 1 compound.41 Most injuries were contusive of low- to mid-thoracic cord, although cervical injury and cord hemi-section models were also used. Reported outcomes in rat studies were based primarily on the BBB score (with improvements of approximately 2-4.5/21 points), while the Basso Mouse Scale42 score (improvement of 2.5/9 points) and the modified BBB score (improvement of 4/14 points) were used primarily in mouse studies.
Compounds no longer in development
Although terminated programs might offer significant insight, information about compounds no longer in development was not readily available. In most cases, the reason for terminating is unclear but may include reevaluation of strategic focus or lack of funding. The vast majority of these compounds were novel therapeutics targeting neuroprotection. The remaining targeted neuroregeneration, or a combination of neuroprotection and neuroregeneration. Mechanisms of action varied widely with significant overlap with current programs.
Only 2 compounds have available information related to development termination (see Supplemental Table 4). Novartis halted research on ATI-355, a Nogo receptor antagonist. In 13 rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys subjected to cervical cord hemisection, manual dexterity improved after treatment with ATI-355.43 However, results of the phase I trial (NCT00406016) were never published for unclear reasons. Christopher Reeve notably developed an anaphylactic reaction to monosialoganglioside GM-1 (Sygen), which failed to meet primary endpoints in a phase III trial.44–46 A 2009 Cochrane review of the phase II47 and phase III44–46 trials found that poor study design and analyses precluded drawing meaningful conclusions about recovery.48
Conclusion on the current R&D and commercial landscape
In providing systematic evaluation of recent R&D activity, this review is not an exhaustive analysis of every experiment or study conducted on all candidate molecules for SCI. Also, while it does not address which model or approach is most promising, this review identified trends and gaps that may influence future development and investment priorities. The pipeline has been hamstrung by significant heterogeneity of modelling, study design, and outcome assessment. Most SCI programs continue to focus on motor improvement by targeting disease-modifying mechanisms, i.e. interfering injury potentiation or enhancing repair processes. However, non-motor symptoms remain significant challenges for patients.49 As understanding of repair and regeneration mechanisms has increased, treatment window may expand beyond acute injury to weeks after SCI, requiring new study designs and offering options for combination therapies. In contrast to disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, that focus on a limited number of targets, a wide array of mechanisms and approaches are being pursued for SCI. This is a reflection of the complex nature of SCI, relative disparity in research funding to identify key mediators of injury and recovery, and lack of universally accepted preclinical modelling. Finally changing demographics and aging of the US population will require further refinement of trial design and appropriate outcome selection. Studies to determine predictive reliability in other species, such as non-human primates and miniature pigs, and across the age spectrum would inform future trial design and decisions to enter clinical trials.2,50 Progress in the development of models, outcomes, and potential therapeutics rely on federal funding, patient advocacy groups, and scientific collaboration.51
Future outlook and directions
The direction of R&D for SCI treatments will continue to be driven by 1) patient need, 2) the opportunity to reduce cost of care and loss of productivity, and 3) emerging scientific and technological breakthroughs, such as nanomedicine, specific tissue targeting, cell therapies, and precision medicine. The complexity of SCI suggests that clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes will rely on selective, appropriately timed modulation of vascular, immune, growth, repair, and other signalling pathways;52–55 however, combination therapy will be challenging.56,57 Emerging drug formulation and delivery technologies will improve pharmacokinetics and -dynamics through blood-spinal cord barrier and scar tissue.58,59 Collective contributions of traditional R&D, increased transparency and data mining (e.g. Visualized Syndromic Information and Outcomes for Neurotrauma-SCI),60 implementation of patient registries (e.g. Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry),61 and development of data standards for clinical research (e.g. NINDS SCI Common Data Elements)62 will be essential. Advances in the prevention of injury, neurocritical care, rehabilitation, biomaterials, and devices will also play a key role in future pharmacotherapy. However, until breakthrough in understanding the biology mediating SCI injury and recovery occurs, risk-averse companies will likely leverage repurposed molecules from non-SCI indications engaging SCI-relevant pathways.
Disclaimer statements
Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest related to any of the compounds described in the manuscript.
ORCID
Michael L. Jameshttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-5210
References
- 1.Dasari VR, Veeravalli KK, Dinh DH.. Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injuries: A review. World J Stem Cells 2014;6(2):120–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Navarro R, Juhas S, Keshavarzi S, Juhasova J, Motlik J, Johe K, et al. Chronic spinal compression model in minipigs: a systematic behavioral, qualitative, and quantitative neuropathological study. J Neurotrauma 2012;29(3):499–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Molinari M.. Distribution-based estimates of clinically significant changes in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor and sensory scores. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013;49(3):373–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG.. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S2–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ditunno JF Jr., Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G.. The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Paraplegia 1994;32(2):70–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chow DS, Teng Y, Toups EG, Aarabi B, Harrop JS, Shaffrey CI, et al. Pharmacology of riluzole in acute spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;17(1 Suppl):129–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grossman RG, Fehlings MG, Frankowski RF, Burau KD, Chow DS, Tator C, et al. A prospective, multicenter, phase I matched-comparison group trial of safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of riluzole in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2014;31(3):239–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fehlings MG, Theodore N, Harrop J, Maurais G, Kuntz C, Shaffrey CI, et al. A phase I/IIa clinical trial of a recombinant Rho protein antagonist in acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2011;28(5):787–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Steeves JD, Lammertse DP, Kramer JL, Kleitman N, Kalsi-Ryan S, Jones L, et al. Outcome Measures for Acute/Subacute Cervical Sensorimotor Complete (AIS-A) Spinal Cord Injury During a Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012;18(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Casha S, Zygun D, McGowan MD, Bains I, Yong VW, Hurlbert RJ.. Results of a phase II placebo-controlled randomized trial of minocycline in acute spinal cord injury. Brain 2012;135(Pt 4):1224–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hansebout RR, Blight AR, Fawcett S, Reddy K.. 4-Aminopyridine in chronic spinal cord injury: a controlled, double-blind, crossover study in eight patients. J Neurotrauma 1993;10(1):1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hayes KC, Blight AR, Potter PJ, Allatt RD, Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL, et al. Preclinical trial of 4-aminopyridine in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1993;31(4):216–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hayes KC, Potter PJ, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JT, Delaney GA, Blight AR.. 4-Aminopyridine-sensitive neurologic deficits in patients with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 1994;11(4):433–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Potter PJ, Hayes KC, Segal JL, Hsieh JT, Brunnemann SR, Delaney GA, et al. Randomized double-blind crossover trial of fampridine-SR (sustained release 4-aminopyridine) in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 1998;15(10):837–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cardenas DD, Ditunno J, Graziani V, Jackson AB, Lammertse D, Potter P, et al. Phase 2 trial of sustained-release fampridine in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal cord 2007;45(2):158–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cardenas DD, Ditunno JF, Graziani V, McLain AB, Lammertse DP, Potter PJ, et al. Two phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of fampridine-SR for treatment of spasticity in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal cord 2014;52(1):70–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lord-Fontaine S, Yang F, Diep Q, Dergham P, Munzer S, Tremblay P, et al. Local inhibition of Rho signaling by cell-permeable recombinant protein BA-210 prevents secondary damage and promotes functional recovery following acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2008;25(11):1309–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rabchevsky AG, Fugaccia I, Turner AF, Blades DA, Mattson MP, Scheff SW.. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) enhances functional recovery following severe spinal cord injury to the rat. Exp Neurol 2000;164(2):280–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee JH, Roy J, Sohn HM, Cheong M, Liu J, Stammers AT, et al. Magnesium in a polyethylene glycol formulation provides neuroprotection after unilateral cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 2010;35(23):2041–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ditor DS, John SM, Roy J, Marx JC, Kittmer C, Weaver LC.. Effects of polyethylene glycol and magnesium sulfate administration on clinically relevant neurological outcomes after spinal cord injury in the rat. J Neurosci Res 2007;85(7):1458–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ates O, Cayli SR, Gurses I, Turkoz Y, Tarim O, Cakir CO, et al. Comparative neuroprotective effect of sodium channel blockers after experimental spinal cord injury. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14(7):658–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yune TY, Lee JY, Jung GY, Kim SJ, Jiang MH, Kim YC, et al. Minocycline alleviates death of oligodendrocytes by inhibiting pro-nerve growth factor production in microglia after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2007;27(29):7751–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kitamura K, Iwanami A, Nakamura M, Yamane J, Watanabe K, Suzuki Y, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor promotes endogenous repair and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res 2007;85(11):2332–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang X, Budel S, Baughman K, Gould G, Song KH, Strittmatter SM.. Ibuprofen enhances recovery from spinal cord injury by limiting tissue loss and stimulating axonal growth. J Neurotrauma 2009;26(1):81–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fu Q, Hue J, Li S.. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs promote axon regeneration via RhoA inhibition. J Neurosci 2007;27(15):4154–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Guertin PA, Ung RV, Rouleau P.. Oral administration of a tri-therapy for central pattern generator activation in paraplegic mice: proof-of-concept of efficacy. Biotechnol J 2010;5(4):421–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kitamura K, Fujiyoshi K, Yamane J, Toyota F, Hikishima K, Nomura T, et al. Human hepatocyte growth factor promotes functional recovery in primates after spinal cord injury. PloS one 2011;6(11):e27706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Geissler SA, Schmidt CE, Schallert T.. Rodent Models and Behavioral Outcomes of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. J Spine 2013;Suppl 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Barros Filho TE, Molina AE.. Analysis of the sensitivity and reproducibility of the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) scale in Wistar rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2008;63(1):103–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC.. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma 1995;12(1):1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Metz GA, Curt A, van de Meent H, Klusman I, Schwab ME, Dietz V.. Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a comparative study of human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2000;17(1):1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bradbury EJ, Moon LD, Popat RJ, King VR, Bennett GS, Patel PN, et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 2002;416(6881):636–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nordblom J, Persson JK, Aberg J, Blom H, Engqvist H, Brismar H, et al. FGF1 containing biodegradable device with peripheral nerve grafts induces corticospinal tract regeneration and motor evoked potentials after spinal cord resection. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2012;30(2):91–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sakka L, Deletage N, Lalloue F, Duval A, Chazal J, Lemaire JJ, et al. SCO-spondin derived peptide NX210 induces neuroprotection in vitro and promotes fiber regrowth and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. PloS one 2014;9(3):e93179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Springer JE, Rao RR, Lim HR, Cho SI, Moon GJ, Lee HY, et al. The functional and neuroprotective actions of Neu2000, a dual-acting pharmacological agent, in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2010;27(1):139–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Costa LM, Pereira JE, Filipe VM, Magalhaes LG, Couto PA, Gonzalo-Orden JM, et al. Rolipram promotes functional recovery after contusive thoracic spinal cord injury in rats. Behav Brain Res 2013;243:66–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Warrington AE, Bieber AJ, Ciric B, Pease LR, Van Keulen V, Rodriguez M.. A recombinant human IgM promotes myelin repair after a single, very low dose. J Neurosci Res 2007;85(5):967–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Namsolleck P, Boato F, Schwengel K, Paulis L, Matho KS, Geurts N, et al. AT2-receptor stimulation enhances axonal plasticity after spinal cord injury by upregulating BDNF expression. Neurobiol Dis 2013;51:177–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Goldshmit Y, Matteo R, Sztal T, Ellett F, Frisca F, Moreno K, et al. Blockage of lysophosphatidic acid signaling improves spinal cord injury outcomes. Am J Pathol 2012;181(3):978–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tep C, Lim TH, Ko PO, Getahun S, Ryu JC, Goettl VM, et al. Oral administration of a small molecule targeted to block proNGF binding to p75 promotes myelin sparing and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2013;33(2):397–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang X, Duffy P, McGee AW, Hasan O, Gould G, Tu N, et al. Recovery from chronic spinal cord contusion after Nogo receptor intervention. Ann Neurol 2011;70(5):805–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Basso DM, Fisher LC, Anderson AJ, Jakeman LB, McTigue DM, Popovich PG.. Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains. J Neurotrauma 2006;23(5):635–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Freund P, Schmidlin E, Wannier T, Bloch J, Mir A, Schwab ME, et al. Anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment promotes recovery of manual dexterity after unilateral cervical lesion in adult primates--re-examination and extension of behavioral data. Eur J Neurosci 2009;29(5):983–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D.. The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S87–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D.. Measurements and recovery patterns in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S68–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D.. Recruitment and early treatment in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26(24 Suppl):S58–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Geisler FH, Dorsey FC, Coleman WP.. Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury--a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside. N Engl J Med 1991;324(26):1829–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chinnock P, Roberts I.. Gangliosides for acute spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(2):CD004444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL.. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012;29(8):1548–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cheriyan T, Ryan DJ, Weinreb JH, Cheriyan J, Paul JC, Lafage V, et al. Spinal cord injury models: a review. Spinal cord 2014;52(8):588–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Steeves JD, Lammertse D, Curt A, Fawcett JW, Tuszynski MH, Ditunno JF, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures. Spinal cord 2007;45(3):206–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen G, Zhang Z, Wang S, Lv D.. Combined treatment with FK506 and nerve growth factor for spinal cord injury in rats. Exp Ther Med 2013;6(4):868–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhao X, Yao GS, Liu Y, Wang J, Satkunendrarajah K, Fehlings M.. The role of neural precursor cells and self assembling peptides in nerve regeneration. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;42:60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gerin CG, Madueke IC, Perkins T, Hill S, Smith K, Haley B, et al. Combination strategies for repair, plasticity, and regeneration using regulation of gene expression during the chronic phase after spinal cord injury. Synapse 2011;65(12):1255–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mestre H, Alkon T, Salazar S, Ibarra A.. Spinal cord injury sequelae alter drug pharmacokinetics: an overview. Spinal cord 2011;49(9):955–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mountney A, Zahner MR, Sturgill ER, Riley CJ, Aston JW, Oudega M, et al. Sialidase, chondroitinase ABC, and combination therapy after spinal cord contusion injury. J Neurotrauma 2013;30(3):181–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Streijger F, Lee JH, Duncan GJ, Ng MT, Assinck P, Bhatnagar T, et al. Combinatorial treatment of acute spinal cord injury with ghrelin, ibuprofen, C16, and ketogenic diet does not result in improved histologic or functional outcome. J Neurosci Res 2014;92(7):870–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Caron I, Papa S, Rossi F, Forloni G, Veglianese P.. Nanovector-mediated drug delivery for spinal cord injury treatment. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2014;6(5):506–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kumar P, Choonara YE, Modi G, Naidoo D, Pillay V.. Nanoparticulate strategies for the five R's of traumatic spinal cord injury intervention: restriction, repair, regeneration, restoration and reorganization. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2014;9(2):331–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nielson JL, Guandique CF, Liu AW, Burke DA, Lash AT, Moseanko R, et al. Development of a database for translational spinal cord injury research. J Neurotrauma 2014;31(21):1789–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Noonan VK, Kwon BK, Soril L, Fehlings MG, Hurlbert RJ, Townson A, et al. The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry. Spinal cord 2012;50(1):22–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, Devivo MJ, Grinnon ST, Kleitman N, Lu Y, et al. Using the Spinal Cord Injury Common Data Elements. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012;18(1):23–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
