Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2019 Jan 10;12(1):bcr-2018-226702. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-226702

Duodenal somatostatinoma presenting as obstructive jaundice with the coexistence of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour in neurofibromatosis type 1: a case with review of the literature

Subhanudh Thavaraputta 1, Suzanne Graham 2, Ana M Rivas Mejia 3, Joaquin Lado-Abeal 3
PMCID: PMC6340528  PMID: 30635305

Abstract

Somatostatinomas are rare neuroendocrine tumours, mostly located in the pancreas or duodenum, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 40 million. Duodenal somatostatinomas (DSs) are usually found in association with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), tuberous sclerosis and Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) have also been described in NF1, but the association with somatostatinoma is very uncommon. We report the case of a patient with NF1 who presented with obstructive jaundice due to multiple firm nodules around the ampulla of Vater. A pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed and revealed a 1 cm duodenal/ampullary mass which stained positive for somatostatin, together with a GIST also found on the duodenal wall. Despite its rarity, ampullary somatostatinomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of biliary tract dilation in patients with NF1.

Keywords: endocrine cancer, neuro genetics, neuroendocrinology

Background

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal-dominant disorder resulting from a mutation of the NF1 gene that codifies for neurofibromin. Patients with NF1 have an increased risk of developing benign and malignant tumours.1 2 Gastrointestinal tumours associated with NF1 include mucosal and myenteric nerve hyperplasia, gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), carcinoid tumours and other neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), including somatostatinomas.3 Usually, somatostatinomas are located in the pancreas or duodenum. Forty per cent of cases of duodenal somatostatinomas (DSs) occur in patients with NF1, but the incidence of somatostatinomas in these patients is only 1% to 3%.4–7 The incidence of GISTs in patients with NF1 is 7%,8 and to our knowledge, the co-occurrence of DS and GIST has only been reported in 16 cases (table 1).5 9–22 We report a case of a patient with NF1 who presented with abdominal pain and jaundice due to DS associated with a GIST in the duodenum.

Table 1.

Demographic data, clinical presentation and tumour characteristics of reported cases of DS coexistence with a GIST in NF1

Publication
Year
Age/Sex Presenting symptoms Size of somatostatinoma Metastasis site GIST location Size of GIST tumour Treatment Outcome Author
2000 36/Female GI bleeding, jaundice 1.2 cm Lymph node Duodenum 3.5×3.5 cm Pancreaticoduodenectomy with regional lymph node resection. 24 months alive Karatzas et al 14
2002 64/Female Pancreatitis, cholangitis 1.5 cmx0.8 cm N/A Stomach, duodenum, jejunum Multiple, 0.5–3 cm Duodenum and jejunum resection 12 months alive Usui et al 20
2004 62/Female Anorexia, weight loss 5.0 cm Liver Stomach, jejunum Multiple, 1 cm Gastrojejunal bypass 12 months alive Suzuki et al 19
2005 43/Female GI bleeding 1.5 cm Lymph node, pancreas Jejunum 3.5 cm in diameter Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy 12 months alive Kramer et al 15
2006 45/Female Heartburn, dysphagia and intermittent abdominal pain 1.6×1.6×1.1 cm N/A Duodenum 1.5×0.8×0.8 cm Excisional mass biopsy Not described Juergens et al 13
2007 47/Male GI bleeding 1.7×1.2 cm Liver, lymph node Jejunum 7.0 cm Pancreaticoduodenectomy, hepatic wedge resection 16 months alive Benttini et al 10
2008 59/Female None (high hepatobiliary enzymes) 3.0×2.5 cm Lymph node Duodenum Multiple, 0.5–1.0 cm Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy 48 months alive Ikeda et al 12
2008 49/Female None (dilated biliary duct) 5.0 cm N/A Stomach 5.0 cm in diameter Pancreaticoduodenectomy 72 months alive Sakorafas et al 5
2009 36/Male Jaundice 3.5×3.4×2.2 cm Lymph node Jejunum 0.5×0.5×0.4 cm Pancreaticoduodenectomy with partial jejunum resection 1 year alive Chetty et al 11
2010 43/Male GI bleeding 1.8×2.0×2.0 cm N/A Duodenum, jejunum Multiple, 0.2–0.7 cm (largest one is 2 cm) Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with proximal jejunal resection 18 months alive Relles et al 18
31/Male Dysphagia, abdominal discomfort 0.7×0.4×0.4 cm N/A Duodenum, jejunum 0.5 cm, 1.2 cm Duodenal and jejunal mass resection with reconstruction 6 months alive
2012 67/Female None (dilated biliary and pancreatic duct) two masses, 2.3 cm and 1.8 cm in dimension Lymph node Duodenum 3.0 cm Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy 12 months alive Yoshida et al 22
2013 51/Female Abdominal discomfort Not described N/A Duodenum, jejunum Not described Pancreaticoduodenectomy and imatinib Alive Afsar et al 9
2014 68/Female Incidental finding from an autopsy 2 cm N/A Small bowel (unspecified location) Not described N/A N/A Njei et al 17
2016 81/Female Diarrhoea 2.0×1.5 cm Liver, lymph node Duodenum Not described Subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, hepatic wedge resections 49 days later dead (complication after surgery) Yamamoto et al 21
2016 50/Female GI bleeding Multiple, 0.5–2.5 cm N/A Duodenum 0.4×0.4×0.3 cm Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy 10 days later dead (compliction after surgery) Kumar et al 16
Our case 44/Female Abdominal pain, jaundice 1 cm in dimension Lymph node Duodenum 0.4 cm Pancreaticoduodenectomy 12 months alive until now N/A

DS, duodenal somatostatinoma; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumour; NF1, neurofibromatosis type 1.

Case presentation

A 44-year-old woman with NF1 presented to the emergency department with right upper quadrant abdominal pain of 1-month duration. The pain was described as dull, intermittent, moderate in intensity, non-radiating and exacerbated by eating. She denied fever, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, heartburn and weight loss. Her vital signs were within normal limits on presentation. On physical examination, she had icteric scleras and skin. Diffuse café-au-lait spots and neurofibromas were present on her trunk and all extremities. She had tenderness in the right upper quadrant and epigastrium.

Investigations

Initial laboratory testing suggested biliary tract obstruction: total bilirubin 3.4 mg/dL (n: 0.4–2.0), aspartate transaminase 71 UI/L (n: 15–41), alanine transaminase 34 UI/L (n: 14–54) and alkaline phosphatase 414 UI/L (n: 43–122). Complete blood count, electrolytes and lipase were all within the normal range. Abdominal ultrasound was significant for bile duct dilatation and cholelithiasis.

Treatment

The patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An intraoperative cholangiogram showed a dilated common bile duct without stones. A postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography revealed multiple firm nodules around the ampulla and a dilated common bile duct and pancreatic duct. A biopsy of the ampullary mass revealed cells that stained positive for synaptophysin, chromogranin and CK7, with a Ki-67 of 2% consistent with a low-grade neuroendocrine tumour (NET). A CT with contrast and a MRI of the abdomen and pelvis revealed dilatation of the common bile duct and the pancreatic duct (double duct sign) with a hypodensity lesion of 1×1.3×3 cm at ampulla of Vater that infiltrated the surrounding fat (figures 1 and 2). The patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymph node resection. Histopathology showed a 1 cm mass that stained positive for somatostatin with scattered psammoma bodies in the duodenal wall (figure 3, figure 4). Two out of 10 lymph nodes were positive for tumour invasion. A 4 mm GIST was also incidentally found in the duodenal wall (figure 5). Somatostatin levels and functional positron-emitting tomography/CT (PET/CT) using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues were not performed preoperatively as somatostatinoma was not anticipated in this patient.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

An axial (A) and coronal (B) CT scan of upper abdomen with contrast demonstrated a hypodensity lesion with infiltration of surrounding fat (white arrow) and dilatation of both common bile duct and pancreatic duct (double duct sign; white asterisks) with suspected mass at the area of ampulla of Vater.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

An axial (A) and coronal (B) section of abdominal MRI T2 showing a dilatation of both common bile duct and pancreatic duct (double duct sign; black asterisks) with hypodensity lesion suspected mass on a coronal view (size 1×1.3×3 cm) obstructed at the ampulla of Vater (white arrow).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A), (B) This is a H&E stain of well-differentiated duodenal neoplasm composed entirely of the somatostatin-producing cell as polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm arranged in solid nests and pseudoglandular foci (black asterisks) with psammoma bodies (C) and (D) (black arrow) located in the duodenal wall.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) and (B) demonstrated immunohistochemistry staining (brown colour) of somatostatin-producing cell in duodenum tissue under duodenal mucosa.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) H and E stain of 4 mm of GIST tumour in the duodenal wall (black arrow). (B) Presence of GIST with spindle cell arrangement showing immunoreactivity for CD117 (black arrow). GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

Outcome and follow-up

The postoperative course was uneventful. After surgery, somatostatin levels were 25 pg/mL (n<30 pg/mL) and screening for pheochromocytoma was negative. Somatostatin levels, CT scan and MRI of the abdomen and pelvis have been followed for surveillance and have shown no evidence of recurrent disease or metastasis. The patient remains free of disease 1 year after surgery. Considering the reported correlation between MEN (multiple endocrine neoplasias) and somatostatinomas, it is important to note that although the patient was not screened for MEN1 mutation, she did have normal parathyroid hormone and other minerals levels. Moreover, there was no pituitary lesion noted on a recent head MRI.

Discussion

Patients with the NF1 have an increased risk of developing benign and malignant tumours, with a cumulative cancer risk of 20% in affected patients who are older than 50 years of age.1 2 6 23 24 This is thought to be in part mediated by loss-of-function mutations in neurofibromin which regulates cell proliferation.25 A reduction or complete loss of normal function of neurofibromin results in activation of the RAS signal transduction pathway and ultimately in stimulation of cell proliferation and survival.23 Deletion of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A and mutations in tumour protein 53 have also been reported in these patients and are thought to contribute to their increased risk of tumour formation.24–27

Somatostatinomas are rare gastrointestinal NETs that develop from enteric endocrine cells and that are believed to originate from endodermal cells. Histologically, they are similar to other well-differentiated NETs, staining positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin A; somatostatinomas specifically usually have psammoma bodies and show diffuse staining for somatostatin.4 28 Pancreatic somatostatinomas tend to be larger in size (typically >4 cm) and often have a more aggressive course that the DSs.29 Pancreatic somatostatinomas usually cause somatostatin syndrome, presenting with hyperglycaemia, abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, jaundice, diarrhoea, steatorrhoea and weight loss.23 30 In contrast, DSs are about 2–3 cm in diameter at the time of diagnosis and patients present with non-specific symptoms including abdominal pain (25%), jaundice (25%) and cholelithiasis (19%).29 31 Most cases of DSs occur in association with NF1.

The main peptide released from somatostatinoma is somatostatin, which should be measured at diagnosis and followed thereafter as a tumour marker for surveillance. These tumours express somatostatin receptor types 2 and 5 and therefore, can be localised using somatostatin receptor-based imaging techniques. Gallium 68 DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-Octreotate (68Ga-DOTATATE) is the radiotracer with the highest sensitivity,31 and the use of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, along with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, CT scan and MRI should be considered for the localisation, staging and preoperative assessment of NETs and somatostatinomas specifically.32 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT has the added benefit of allowing the assessment of somatostatin receptor status which is relevant to predict the tumour’s response to somatostatin analogues and peptide receptor radioligand therapy.31

Surgical resection is recommended considering its malignancy potential. Local lymphadenectomy should be considered in tumours that are >1 cm since they are more likely to invade beyond the submucosa and tend to metastasis to lymph nodes. Whipple’s operation with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered for more aggressive or larger tumours. Radiation and chemotherapy are also treatment options, but most metastatic NETs are unresponsive to chemotherapy.33–37 For tumours <1 cm, there is no consensus regarding management, although endoscopic excision is considered a reasonable approach because of the low incidence of metastasis and lymph node involvement.

GISTs are rare mesenchymal tumours that arise from the digestive tract, with a reported incidence of 7 to 20 per million, accounting for <1% of all gastrointestinal tumours.38 They commonly occur in patients with NF1, and autopsy studies have reported as many as one of three patients with NF1 to have GISTs.39 Histologically, they are composed of mesenchymal spindle, epithelioid or pleomorphic cells and are usually CD117 or CD34 positive on an immunohistochemical stain. Its presentation can vary from simple abdominal pain, vomiting, bowel obstruction to gastrointestinal bleeding or it can be found incidentally in asymptomatic patients. The standard treatment is also surgical excision and possibly adjuvant chemotherapy (imatinib) on advanced stages.40 41

The coexistence of somatostatinoma and GISTs in a patient with NF1 is uncommon; after a literature review on MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE from inception to June 2018, we identified 16 reported cases as shown in table 1.

Seventy-six per cent of the patients were women, with ages ranging between 30 and 80 years. Presenting symptoms were mainly associated with the local effect of the somatostatinoma tumour and included abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding and signs of biliary obstruction. The size of the somatostatinomas from pathological reports ranged from 2 to 3 cm, with only two cases >5 cm. Lymph nodes are a common location site of metastasis, and eight cases had lymph node involvement. In most cases, GISTs were incidentally found and generally located in the duodenum (11 cases), others less common location included the stomach and jejunum. Almost every patient (12 cases) underwent a Whipple procedure. Thirteen patients (82%), including ours, were reported to be alive after 6 months; 2 patients deceased due to complications after surgery, and 2 cases were incidentally found in the autopsy.

It is unknown whether the coexistence of somatostatinomas and GISTs in patients with NF1 is a coincidental finding or a rare association resulting from a common underlying molecular event. Mutations in the KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha genes that are found in >80% of GISTs are lacking in patients with NF1.39 Instead, loss of heterozygosity of neurofibromin 1 gene consequencing to have negative regulation in the RAS signal transduction pathway has been found in GISTs associated with NF1.39 42 Similar findings in insulinomas of patient with NF1 suggest that the same mechanism underlies tumourigenesis of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), such as somatostatinomas, in this population. Along these lines, and making it more likely that they might share common pathogenesis with somatostatinomas, GISTs have been found to express synaptic-like microvesicle proteins, as is commonly found in NETs.43 In addition, GISTs have been reported in patients with MEN1 and 2,44 45 supporting the possible neuroendocrine nature of GISTs.

Establishing an association between GISTs and DSs in patients with NF1 can be a hint to help determine the genetic mechanisms behind the development of these tumours in patients with NF1. If this relationship is indeed proven, acknowledging and recognising would allow for better preoperative planning and intraoperative evaluation, helping avoid multiple operations with unrecognised lesions at the time of initial surgery.

Learning points.

  • The patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), who presents with jaundice and abdominal pain similar to cholelithiasis, should consider duodenal somatostatinoma (DS) as a possible diagnosis.

  • DSs do not cause somatostatinoma syndrome and tissue specimens are needed to establish the diagnosis.

  • Coexistence of gastrointestinal tumour with DS in NF1 should be investigated.

  • In NF1, physicians should be aware of the risk of developing associated cancers. Surveillance and monitoring investigation possible are considered being beneficial.

Footnotes

Patient consent for publication: Obtained.

Contributors: ST: data acquisition, drafting manuscript, manuscript revision, gathering information, and literature review/search. SG: involved in a patient care, manuscript revision, image selection and interpretation. JL-A: involved in patient care, manuscript revision and final approval. ARM: manuscript revision, data acquisition and corresponding author.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1. Riccardi VM. Von Recklinghausen Neurofibromatosis. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1981;305:1617–27. 10.1056/NEJM198112313052704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Adil A, Singh AK. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (Von Recklinghausen). StatPearls: Treasure Island, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Agaimy A, Vassos N, Croner RS. Gastrointestinal manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 1 (Recklinghausen’s disease): clinicopathological spectrum with pathogenetic considerations. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2012;5:852–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tanaka S, Yamasaki S, Matsushita H, et al. Duodenal somatostatinoma: a case report and review of 31 cases with special reference to the relationship between tumor size and metastasis. Pathol Int 2000;50:146–52. 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2000.01016.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sakorafas GH, Giannopoulos GA, Parasi A, et al. Large somatostatin-producing endocrine carcinoma of the ampulla of vater in association with GIST in a patient with von Recklinghausen’s disease. Case report and review of the literature. JOP 2008;9:633–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Metz DC, Jensen RT. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1469–92. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Fendrich V, Ramaswamy A, Slater EP, et al. Duodenal somatostatinoma associated with Von Recklinghausen’s disease. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004;11:417–21. 10.1007/s00534-004-0918-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zöller ME, Rembeck B, Odén A, et al. Malignant and benign tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 in a defined Swedish population. Cancer 1997;79:2125–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Afşar CU, Kara IO, Kozat BK, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leiomyosarcoma and osteosarcoma: four cases of rare tumors and a review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2013;86:191–9. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bettini R, Falconi M, Crippa S, et al. Ampullary somatostatinomas and jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a patient with Von Recklinghausen’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:2761–3. 10.3748/wjg.v13.i19.2761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chetty R, Vajpeyi R. Vasculopathic changes, a somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine carcinoma and a jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a patient with type 1 neurofibromatosis. Endocr Pathol 2009;20:177–81. 10.1007/s12022-009-9083-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ikeda HKK, Paku T, Yoshida Y, et al. Ampullary carcinoid and duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor associated with von recklinghausen’s disease. J of the Japan Society of Clinical Surgery 2008;69:1668–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Juergens KU, Weckesser M, Bettendorf O, et al. Duodenal somatostatinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: diagnosis with PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W233–4. 10.2214/AJR.05.1328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Karatzas G, Kouraklis G, Karayiannakis A, et al. Ampullary carcinoid and jejunal stromal tumour associated with von Recklinghausen’s disease presenting as gastrointestinal bleeding and jaundice. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000;26:428–9. 10.1053/ejso.1999.0911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kramer K, Siech M, Sträter J, et al. [GI hemorrhage with fulminant shock induced by jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) coincident with duodenal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NET) + neurofibromatosis (NF) -- case report and review of the literature]. Z Gastroenterol 2005;43:281–8. 10.1055/s-2004-813810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kumar T, Gupta B, Das P, et al. Combined presence of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors along with duodenal submucosal somatostatinoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2016;59:359–61. 10.4103/0377-4929.188123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Njei B, Sanchez H. Education and imaging. Gastrointestinal: neurofibromatosis type 1, duodenal somatostatinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors; a triad worth remembering. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:663 10.1111/jgh.12531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Relles D, Baek J, Witkiewicz A, et al. Periampullary and duodenal neoplasms in neurofibromatosis type 1: two cases and an updated 20-year review of the literature yielding 76 cases. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:1052–61. 10.1007/s11605-009-1123-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Suzuki S, Sato K, Katada E, et al. Periampullary somatostatinoma and multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated with von Recklinghausen’s disease. J Gastroenterol 2004;39:1011–2. 10.1007/s00535-004-1438-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Usui M, Matsuda S, Suzuki H, et al. Somatostatinoma of the papilla of Vater with multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a patient with von Recklinghausen’s disease. J Gastroenterol 2002;37:947–53. 10.1007/s005350200159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yamamoto R, Kato S, Maru T, et al. The coexistence of somatostatinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the duodenum of a patient with von recklinghausen’s disease. Intern Med 2016;55:617–22. 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yoshioka ISS, Matsui K, Omura T, et al. Somatostatinoma of the papilla of Vater and duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a patient with von Recklinghausen’s disease. J of Japan Biliary Association 2012;26:727–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lodish MB, Stratakis CA. Endocrine tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1, tuberous sclerosis and related syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;24:439–49. 10.1016/j.beem.2010.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Patil S, Chamberlain RS. Neoplasms associated with germline and somatic NF1 gene mutations. Oncologist 2012;17:101–16. 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Rasmussen SA, Overman J, Thomson SA, et al. Chromosome 17 loss-of-heterozygosity studies in benign and malignant tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000;28:425–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wiest V, Eisenbarth I, Schmegner C, et al. Somatic NF1 mutation spectra in a family with neurofibromatosis type 1: toward a theory of genetic modifiers. Hum Mutat 2003;22:423–7. 10.1002/humu.10272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Uusitalo E, Hammais A, Palonen E, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 gene mutation analysis using sequence capture and high-throughput sequencing. Acta Derm Venereol 2014;94:663–6. 10.2340/00015555-1843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Garbrecht N, Anlauf M, Schmitt A, et al. Somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum and pancreas: incidence, types, biological behavior, association with inherited syndromes, and functional activity. Endocr Relat Cancer 2008;15:229–41. 10.1677/ERC-07-0157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mao C, Shah A, Hanson DJ, et al. Von Recklinghausen’s disease associated with duodenal somatostatinoma: contrast of duodenal versus pancreatic somatostatinomas. J Surg Oncol 1995;59:67–73. 10.1002/jso.2930590116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Cappelli C, Agosti B, Braga M, et al. Von Recklinghausen’s neurofibromatosis associated with duodenal somatostatinoma. A case report and review of the literature. Minerva Endocrinol 2004;29:19–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Vinik A, Pacak K, Feliberti E, et al. Somatostatinoma : De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Endotext South Dartmouth (MA)2000-2017: South Dartmouth. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Delle Fave G, O’Toole D, Sundin A, et al. ENETS Consensus guidelines update for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 2016;103:119–24. 10.1159/000443168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kim JA, Choi WH, Kim CN, et al. Duodenal somatostatinoma: a case report and review. Korean J Intern Med 2011;26:103–7. 10.3904/kjim.2011.26.1.103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Koc O, Duzkoylu Y, Sari YS, et al. Duodenal somatostatinoma: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2013;7:115 10.1186/1752-1947-7-115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Patel VG, Henderson VJ, Fairweather DA, et al. Malignant duodenal somatostatinoma presenting in association with von recklinghausen disease. Am Surg 2003;69:1077–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Dogeas E, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, et al. Duodenal and ampullary carcinoid tumors: size predicts necessity for lymphadenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:1262–9. 10.1007/s11605-017-3448-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Mullen JT, Wang H, Yao JC, et al. Carcinoid tumors of the duodenum. Surgery 2005;138:971–8. 10.1016/j.surg.2005.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014;25:iii21–6. 10.1093/annonc/mdu255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Zhao X, Yue C. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012;3:189–208. 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Miettinen M, Fetsch JF, Sobin LH, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis 1: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 45 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:90–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Valencia E, Saif MW. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and GIST: is there a correlation? Anticancer Res 2014;34:5609–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Maertens O, Prenen H, Debiec-Rychter M, et al. Molecular pathogenesis of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors in NF1 patients. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15:1015–23. 10.1093/hmg/ddl016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Bümming P, Nilsson O, Ahlman H, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regularly express synaptic vesicle proteins: evidence of a neuroendocrine phenotype. Endocr Relat Cancer 2007;14:853–63. 10.1677/ERC-06-0014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Malek R, McCarthy-Keith D, Levens ED, et al. A gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A and metastatic medullary thyroid cancer to the ovaries. Endocr Pract 2008;14:898–901. 10.4158/EP.14.7.898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Massironi S, Rossi RE, Ferrero S, et al. An esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a patient with MEN1-related pancreatic gastrinoma: an unusual association and review of the literature. J Cancer Res Ther 2014;10:443–5. 10.4103/0973-1482.136685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES