Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2019 Jan 20;12(1):e227391. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227391

Novel intronic DICER1 variation associated with pleuropulmonary blastoma in two siblings

Bruce D Leckey Jr 1, John M Carney 1, Jessica M Sun 2, Elizabeth N Pavlisko 1
PMCID: PMC6340604  PMID: 30665929

Abstract

Pleuropulmonary blastomas (PPB) are rare aggressive paediatric lung malignancies associated with DICER1 variants. We present two cases, a 2-year-old girl with upper respiratory tract symptoms as well as a 6-month-old girl sibling undergoing screening due to family history of malignancy. Imaging of the 2-year-old girl revealed a large mass filling the right hemithorax which was determined to be a type II PPB after pathological examination. Imaging of the 6-month-old sibling demonstrated a small cystic lesion in the posterior basal segment of the right lower lobe which was determined to be a type 1r PPB after pathological examination. The 2-year-old girl received adjuvant chemotherapy while the baby sister underwent resection alone and both are alive and well at 12 months and 7 months, respectively. Sequence analysis in both cases confirmed the same DICER1 variation, c.2437-2A>G (likely pathogenic), which has not been previously described in the literature.

Keywords: genetics, lung cancer (oncology), paediatric oncology, pathology

Background

Paediatric malignancies comprise just 1% of all new cancer diagnoses in the USA per year. Of those, primary pulmonary malignancies are exceedingly rare, comprising only 0.2% of all paediatric malignancies.1 2 Those lung cancers seen in adults are seldom seen in children; however, they do occur. The most common primary paediatric lung malignancy is pleuropulmonary blastomas (PPB) (57.1%). However, paediatric lung malignancies are approximately 12 times more likely to represent a metastasis from another primary tumour.3 We describe two cases of PPB, one presenting with upper respiratory tract symptoms, and the other after precautionary screening, in siblings with a strong family history of malignancies associated with DICER1 variants.

Case presentation

A 2-year-old previously healthy girl presented with several months history of dry non-productive cough, and fatigue. Initially, the family consulted their paediatrician who recommended a humidifier and an antihistamine; no improvement in symptomatology was appreciated. During the several months course, she also developed rhinorrhoea and nasal congestion, but these symptoms resolved spontaneously. She then developed shortness of breath and became increasingly fatigued and irritable. These new symptoms were associated with a decrease in oral intake and urine output, which prompted evaluation at an urgent care office. A chest X-ray was performed and revealed white-out of the entire right thorax with tracheal deviation to the left. She was immediately sent to the emergency department for further workup. In obtaining the family history, it was noted that the patient’s cousin had been recently diagnosed with a pinealoblastoma and PPB which prompted familial genetic testing for DICER1 variants. It was discovered that the patient’s mother was a carrier, as was one of her brothers who is the father of the aforementioned cousin. Two of the mother’s other siblings did not carry the variation, and two more did not know if they carried the variation, one of which has a child who was diagnosed with a medulloblastoma. The 2-year-old’s maternal grandfather was also reported to have the variant, as well as an undefined thyroid problem, but he had not been diagnosed with any of the DICER1 specific anomalies before passing away due to a stroke.

At approximately the same time, the 2-year-old’s mother gave birth to a healthy baby girl. Due to the strong family history of malignancy in the setting of a known DICER1 variation, she underwent genetic testing and radiographic screening to rule out early malignancy. The baby girl was asymptomatic at birth.

Investigations

During the 2-year-old’s evaluation in the emergency department, an ultrasound (US) demonstrated a heterogeneous, echogenic mass filling the right chest with surrounding fluid and atelectatic lung. A follow-up CT chest with contrast was performed and showed a large, heterogeneous cystic and solid enhancing septate mass filling the entire right hemithorax from the apex to the base, with associated mass effect and leftward shift of the mediastinal structures (figure 1A). MRI of the brain did not reveal any evidence of intracranial metastasis. A CT abdomen/pelvis did not demonstrate evidence of intra-abdominal or intrathoracic metastasis or evidence of other disease processes of abdominal or pelvic organs. At this point a multidisciplinary discussion took place, and it was determined that surgery would be required. In addition to resection of the mass, a separate discrete subcentimetre nodule was found on the diaphragm at the time of surgery and was biopsied for suspected metastatic disease. Following resection, gross pathological examination of the 2-year-old’s pulmonary mass revealed a 15.5×14×8 cm subpleural multicystic and solid mass varying in colour and consistency from white to dark brown and soft to firm. Within the cystic spaces were numerous grape-like nodular protrusions with similar characteristics. Histologically, the lung mass was composed predominantly of solid sheets of highly proliferative (mitotic count >10 mitoses per high powered field) blastemal-type cells with areas of necrosis. There was a predominance of rhabdomyosarcoma (figure 2A), as well as chondrosarcoma (figure 2B), and undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma. Histopathological examination of the diaphragmatic nodule revealed similar findings.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CT chest with contrast of (A) 2-year-old demonstrating a large heterogeneous cystic and solid septated mass occupying the right hemithorax with associated mass effect of the mediastinal structures; (B) 6-month-old sibling demonstrating a 7 mm cystic lesion (black arrow) in the posterior basal segment of the right lower lobe.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Area of rhabdomyosarcoma composed of rhabdomyoblasts containing eccentric eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (H&E, ×20). (B) Area of chondrosarcoma composed of a cartilaginous matrix with malignant chondrocytes (H&E, × 20). (C) Immunohistochemistry for muscle specific actin showing positive immunoreactivity in the area of rhabdomyosarcoma (Muscle specific actin (MSA), × 20). (D) Electron microscopy showing spindle cells containing sarcomeres with prominent Z-bands (arrowhead) (×2900).

Immunohistochemistry demonstrated positive immunoreactivity for myo-D1, myogenin and muscle-specific actin (figure 2C) in the tumour cells, and tumour cells lacked immunoreactivity for pancytokeratin, except in overlying normal respiratory epithelium. Electron microscopy was performed and showed immature appearing spindle cells with abundant intracytoplasmic glycogen with variable amounts of actin and myosin filaments as well as prominent sarcomere formation with distinct Z-bands (figure 2D). The gross and microscopic features in conjunction with radiographic imaging and the patient’s family history led to classification as a type II PPB with metastasis to the diaphragm.

The 2-year-old’s baby sister underwent genetic testing and was positive for a DICER1 variation, and a screening chest X-ray 1 month after birth was unremarkable. Four months later, she underwent a chest CT which revealed a 6×7 mm cystic lesion with a single septum in the posterior basal segment of the right lower lobe (figure 1B). US examination of the abdomen and pelvis did not demonstrate evidence of intra-abdominal or intrathoracic metastasis or evidence of other disease processes of abdominal or pelvic organs. Investigational imaging for other sites of metastasis were not undertaken as there have been no reported cases of type I or Ir metastasising.4 Due to the strong family history of malignancy and presence of the DICER1 variation, it was felt that resection was reasonable given the potential for malignancy. At 6 months of age, she underwent resection of the cystic lung lesion. Gross examination demonstrated a 1.1×0.7×0.7 cm unilocular cystic lesion without solid areas. Histologically, the cyst was lined by benign appearing epithelium and lacked primitive or rhabdomyoblastic cell populations. This lesion was classified as type 1r PPB.

Differential diagnosis

The differential for paediatric cystic lung disease includes a bronchogenic cyst, post-traumatic/postinfectious cyst, congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) and cystic forms of PPB. On radiographic grounds, cystic PPBs (type I) may be indistinguishable from CPAM, namely CPAM type 4.5 If one considers the diagnosis of PPB, the differential also includes primary sarcomas of the lung, including rhabdomyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma and chondrosarcoma. Solid areas within PPBs may show various degrees of mesenchymal differentiation, and as PPB is the most common malignant paediatric tumour primary to the lung it should be considered first.6 PPB should not be confused with pulmonary blastoma, a tumour seen more commonly in adults that is characteristically biphasic.3 6

CPAM, previously called congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation, accounts for up to 95% of congenital cystic lung disease.7 CPAMs are classified as types I–IV based on cyst size and multiplicity, the lining epithelium of the cyst and the proportion of the lung involved.8 CPAM type IV, accounting for approximately 10%–15% of CPAMs, may resemble type I PPBs.8 9 Careful histological examination for the presence of immature/primitive mesenchymal cells is necessary for separating CPAM from PPB. This may be even more challenging in cases of ‘regressed’ type I PPBs. The presence of increased stromal cellularity within cyst walls should raise suspicion for a PPB when there is cystic lung disease that clinically appears to represent a CPAM.9 It is essential to exclude type I PPB before a lesion is classified as CPAM type IV.10 11

Primary sarcomas of the lung in the paediatric population are uncommon, some of which may be misdiagnosed and are actually a component of a PPB.12 Cystic synovial sarcoma, though usually seen in older patients, may also be considered.5 In such cases, immunohistochemistry and molecular studies show the characteristic translocation, t(x;18)(pq11.2;q11.2), resulting in a gene fusion (SYT-SSX1 or SYT-SSX2), which can be assessed using break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis.13–16

Treatment

The 2-year-old underwent a right middle lobectomy with complete removal (negative surgical margins) of the type II PPB and biopsy of the PPB in the diaphragm. She then received 36 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma Registry, which includes vincristine, actinomycin D, doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Radiation therapy was not considered given the complete removal of the main lesion and unknown utility of its use in these tumours.

The 6-month-old sibling underwent a right lower lobectomy with complete removal (negative surgical margins) of the type Ir PPB. Due to early detection and resection, she is being followed conservatively without chemotherapy.

Outcome and follow-up

The 2-year-old girl was diagnosed with type II PPB and biopsy proven metastasis to the diaphragm with no other known sites of involvement. Genetic testing of DICER1 demonstrated a familial, likely pathogenic (based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) criteria) heterozygous germline DICER1 variant, c.2437-2A>G (Splice acceptor) and a heterozygous germline variant of uncertain significance, c.4199A>G (p.Asp1400Gly). She completed 36 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy. Three months after the completion of chemotherapy, and 12 months post diagnosis, she is clinically well and remains in remission. Follow-up imaging to monitor for recurrent pulmonary disease will include chest CT’s looking for recurrence, MRI for brain metastasis, early US of the ovaries and thyroid.

As mentioned previously, the 6-month-old carries the same heterozygous germline variation found in her older sister. She is currently 7 months post surgical resection and is clinically doing well. No additional PPB lesions have developed. Follow-up imaging to monitor for recurrent pulmonary disease will include chest CT’s and early US of the ovaries and thyroid.

Discussion

PPB were first described as distinct pulmonary malignancies of childhood with mesenchymal differentiation by Manivel et al in 1988. This was in comparison with pulmonary blastomas of adulthood which contain both epithelial and mesenchymal differentiation.17 18

PPBs can be separated into three distinct subtypes based on gross and microscopic differences. Type I PPBs are cystic. Cysts are lined by benign-appearing epithelium and have an underlying hypercellular region of immature appearing malignant mesenchymal cells forming the so-called ‘cambium-like layer’. A subtype of type I PPBs, type Ir (regressed), lack the typical underlying region of immature malignant cells. Type II PPBs are cystic and solid, with cystic areas resembling type I PPB and more solid areas composed of sarcomatous components which may include rhabdomyosarcoma and/or chondrosarcoma among others. Type III PPBs are solid, resembling the solid areas of type II tumours and lacking the cystic areas of type I tumours. It is widely accepted that these types occur on a developmental spectrum, beginning as a type I and progressing to type II or III.4 19 20 The median age at the time of diagnosis for types I, II and III are 8, 35 and 41 months, respectively.4

PPBs have recently been determined to be a part of a familial cancer syndrome due to variants in the gene DICER1.21 In addition to PPBs, individuals with DICER1 variants are at risk for other malignant and non-malignant lesions of the thyroid, nose and sinuses, pituitary, kidney, ovary, uterus, eye and others.22 DICER1 encodes an endoribonuclease (RNase III) critical in the production of micro-RNA (miRNA). Sequencing of DICER1-associated tumours has demonstrated biallelic variants in DICER1. It has been shown that one allele typically contains a nonsense or frameshift variant leading to complete loss of function (usually germline), while the other allele contains a missense variant (usually somatic) in one of five so-called hotspot codons (E1705, D1709, G1809, D1810 and E1813) in the RNase IIIb domain. Variants leading to complete loss of function do so by truncating the open reading frame before the end of the RNase IIIb domain, while variants in one of the hotspot codons leads to defects in miRNA processing. In particular, cleavage of 5p miRNAs at the 5’ end fails while cleavage of 3p miRNA at the 3’ end is preserved. This leads to an inverse of the 5p to 3p mature RNA ratio observed in otherwise normal tissue, which suggests that uncleaved 5p miRNA is rapidly degraded. Loss of 5p miRNA leads to altered expression of downstream tumour suppressor mRNAs, such as the let-7 family, and may lead to uncontrolled proliferation. The majority of individuals with DICER1-associated tumours harbour a heterozygous germline loss of function variant as the predisposing variant. However, a small percentage of individuals who lack detectable pathogenic germline variation in DICER1 (assuming DICER1 deletion has been ruled out) harbour low-level DICER1 mosaicism or tumor-confined pathogenic DICER1 variation.23 It appears that biallelic disruption of DICER1 is necessary for tumorigenesis and is a variant on Knudson’s two-hit hypothesis. Of note, no cases with biallelic loss of function variants have been reported, leading to the hypothesis that at least some functional activity is necessary for tumour survival.4 23 24

The specific DICER1 variation reported herein as likely pathogenic, c.2437-2A>G (NM_177438.2), has not been previously reported in the literature. According to Invitae, this variant results in a sequence change in intron 15 of DICER1. Algorithms to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site resulting in an absent or disrupted protein product. However, published transcriptional studies have not been done to confirm this. It is known that donor and acceptor splice site variants lead to a perturbation in protein function, and that loss of function variants in DICER1 are pathogenic.21 25 26 In addition, reports of intronic DICER1 variants have been reported in association with PPB, although rarely, and there is a recent report by Schultz et al of a novel intronic DICER1 variant associated with Sertol-Leydig cell tumour.27 These observations, although yet to be proven, are evident enough that this variant is likely pathogenic. In addition, the variant of uncertain significance, c.4199A>G (p.Asp1400Gly) (NM_177438.2), has been reported in the literature, but it has not been associated with DICER1-associated phenotypic features. According to Invitae, this variant leads to a missense variation with glycine replacing aspartic acid at codon 1400 of DICER1. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of such a variation suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. However, published functional studies have not been done to confirm this. In this case, the tumour was not tested for hotspot variants, as the family declined additional genetic testing.

Treatment for PPBs is largely based on the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma Registry group (IPPBR) recommendations. It is their recommendation that all type I PPBs be removed due to their progression over time to types II and III, followed by chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide. Similarly, it is the recommendation of the IPPBR that type Ir PPBs receive chemotherapy similar to type I PPBs, although this is not accepted by many. Five-year overall survival for patients with types I and Ir is 91%.4 Type II and III lesions are treated as one group and their recommendation, based on unpublished observations, is initial surgical resection if feasible followed by chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin D, ifosfamide and doxorubicin. If the tumour is too large for initial resection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is recommended. The utility of radiation therapy is not well studied but is recommended in cases of residual tumour after surgical and failed chemotherapeutic attempts. The 5-year survival for type II and III PPBs is 71% and 53%, respectively.4

According to Schultz et al, those individuals with a diagnosis of PPB of any type, as well as any of a number of major or minor indications in addition to family history of DICER1-associated conditions, should underdo genetic screening for DICER1 variants. If an individual desires not to pursue genetic testing, it is recommended that they follow surveillance guidelines as if they had a DICER1 variant until genetic testing proves otherwise. If an individual with any of the indications proposed by Schultz et al undergoes genetic screening but does not have a germline DICER1 variant, it is recommended that additional genetic testing for duplications/deletions be done as copy number variants are responsible for some cases. In those individuals who have a tumour that meets the indications for DICER1 testing, whether a germline variant is present or not, tumour tissue should be tested to identify somatic variants. If only somatic variants are identified, this suggests a non-inherited case and screening of first-degree relatives is not recommended. However, if a germline variant is identified, screening of first-degree relatives is recommended. Whether there is a positive family history or a personal history of DICER1-associated conditions, screening of other organs is recommended for early detection of lesions. Prenatal screening is recommended in the third trimester with a US for the detection of pulmonary cysts. If a cyst is identified, follow-up with postnatal CT is required. Postnatal screening needs to take into consideration the median age of onset of these conditions, the organ systems at risk and the benefit of early detection to the risks associated with the screening methodology. It is recommended for surveillance of the lungs that a chest X-ray be obtained every 4–6 months until 8 years of age, with consideration of a chest CT at 3–6 months, and a yearly chest X-ray thereafter until age 12; for female patients, starting at ages 8–10, that pelvic and abdominal USs be obtained every 6–12 months until at least age 40; for the kidneys, an abdominal US be obtained every 6 months until age 8 with yearly USs obtained thereafter until age 12; and for thyroid a baseline US by age 8 with an additional US every 3 years thereafter unless symptoms emerge. For full screening recommendations, refer to 28 28

In support of these screening recommendations, the finding of PPB in the older sibling lead to judicious use of imaging of the baby sister which lead to the early detection of the type Ir PPB and potentially improving her outcome significantly.

Learning points.

  • Pleuropulmonary blastomas (PPB) are distinct malignancies of childhood associated with DICER1 variants.

  • There are three different types of PPB, types I–III, based on morphology.

  • The family history of malignancy, especially DICER1-associated tumours, prompted genetic testing and the successful diagnosis of a child with otherwise non-specific respiratory symptoms.

  • Following DICER1 genetic testing, surveillance for DICER1-associated tumours, as per published guidelines, was conducted on the younger sibling and resulted in the successful detection and resection of an early-stage PPB.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Januario C. Estrada BSMT, HT(ASCP), MSA of the Duke Electron Microscopy Service for assistance with the generation of the EM images.

Footnotes

Patient consent for publication: Parental/guardian consent obtained.

Contributors: All authors participated in the care of the patients as well as the design, content and final editing of the case report. In addition, JS was the attending oncologist for the patients and provided clinical history and editing of the final draft. ENP was the attending pathologist who provided the primary diagnoses and design and editing of the final draft. BDL assisted in the primary diagnosis of the patients, acquisition of the photomicrographs and overall content of the final draft. JC assisted with the primary diagnoses and assisted with the differential diagnosis section as well as overall editing of the final draft.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1. Linet MS, Ries LA, Smith MA, et al. Cancer surveillance series: recent trends in childhood cancer incidence and mortality in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1051–8. 10.1093/jnci/91.12.1051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ward E, DeSantis C, Robbins A, et al. Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:83–103. 10.3322/caac.21219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dishop MK, Kuruvilla S. Primary and metastatic lung tumors in the pediatric population: a review and 25-year experience at a large children’s hospital. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:1079–103.doi:10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[1079:PAMLTI]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Messinger YH, Stewart DR, Priest JR, et al. Pleuropulmonary blastoma: a report on 350 central pathology-confirmed pleuropulmonary blastoma cases by the international pleuropulmonary blastoma registry. Cancer 2015;121:276–85. 10.1002/cncr.29032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Priest JR, Williams GM, Hill DA, et al. Pulmonary cysts in early childhood and the risk of malignancy. Pediatr Pulmonol 2009;44:14–30. 10.1002/ppul.20917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dehner LP, Messinger YH, Schultz KA, et al. Pleuropulmonary blastoma: evolution of an entity as an entry into a familial tumor predisposition syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2015;18:504–11. 10.2350/15-10-1732-OA.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ben-Ishay O, Nicksa GA, Wilson JM, et al. Management of giant congenital pulmonary airway malformations requiring pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:1073–8. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. David M, Lamas-Pinheiro R, Henriques-Coelho T. Prenatal and postnatal management of congenital pulmonary airway malformation. Neonatology 2016;110:101–15. 10.1159/000440894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. MacSweeney F, Papagiannopoulos K, Goldstraw P, et al. An assessment of the expanded classification of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations and their relationship to malignant transformation. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:1139–46. 10.1097/00000478-200308000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Stocker JT, Dehner LP, Husain AN. Stocker and dehner’s pediatric pathology. 2015.
  • 11. Stocker JT, Mani H, Husain AN. The Respiratory Tract : Stocker JT, Dehner LP, Husain AN, Pediatric pathology. 3rd edn Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011:441–515. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pai S, Eng HL, Lee SY, et al. Correction: Pleuropulmonary blastoma, not rhabdomyosarcoma in a congenital lung cyst. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:370–1. 10.1002/pbc.20965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fletcher CDM. Diagnostic histopathology of tumors. 1 1. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cummings NM, Desai S, Thway K, et al. Cystic primary pulmonary synovial sarcoma presenting as recurrent pneumothorax: report of 4 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:1176–9. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e85c87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Foo WC, Cruise MW, Wick MR, et al. Immunohistochemical staining for TLE1 distinguishes synovial sarcoma from histologic mimics. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;135:839–44. 10.1309/AJCP45SSNAOPXYXU [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Terry J, Saito T, Subramanian S, et al. TLE1 as a diagnostic immunohistochemical marker for synovial sarcoma emerging from gene expression profiling studies. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:240–6. 10.1097/01.pas.0000213330.71745.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Manivel JC, Priest JR, Watterson J, et al. Pleuropulmonary blastoma. The so-called pulmonary blastoma of childhood. Cancer 1988;62:1516–26. 10.1002/1097-0142(19881015)62:8<1516::AID-CNCR2820620812>3.0.CO;2-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Koss MN, Hochholzer L, O’Leary T. Pulmonary blastomas. Cancer 1991;67:2368–81. 10.1002/1097-0142(19910501)67:9<2368::AID-CNCR2820670926>3.0.CO;2-G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Priest JR, McDermott MB, Bhatia S, et al. Pleuropulmonary blastoma: a clinicopathologic study of 50 cases. Cancer 1997;80:147–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hill DA, Jarzembowski JA, Priest JR, et al. Type I pleuropulmonary blastoma: pathology and biology study of 51 cases from the international pleuropulmonary blastoma registry. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:282–95. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181484165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hill DA, Ivanovich J, Priest JR, et al. DICER1 mutations in familial pleuropulmonary blastoma. Science 2009;325:965 10.1126/science.1174334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Schultz KA, Yang J, Doros L, et al. DICER1-pleuropulmonary blastoma familial tumor predisposition syndrome: a unique constellation of neoplastic conditions. Pathol Case Rev 2014;19:90–100. 10.1097/PCR.0000000000000027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Brenneman M, Field A, Yang J, et al. Temporal order of RNase IIIb and loss-of-function mutations during development determines phenotype in pleuropulmonary blastoma / DICER1 syndrome: a unique variant of the two-hit tumor suppression model. F1000Res 2015;4:214 10.12688/f1000research.6746.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pugh TJ, Yu W, Yang J, et al. Exome sequencing of pleuropulmonary blastoma reveals frequent biallelic loss of TP53 and two hits in DICER1 resulting in retention of 5p-derived miRNA hairpin loop sequences. Oncogene 2014;33:5295–302. 10.1038/onc.2014.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Baralle D, Baralle M. Splicing in action: assessing disease causing sequence changes. J Med Genet 2005;42:737–48. 10.1136/jmg.2004.029538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Slade I, Bacchelli C, Davies H, et al. DICER1 syndrome: clarifying the diagnosis, clinical features and management implications of a pleiotropic tumour predisposition syndrome. J Med Genet 2011;48:273–8. 10.1136/jmg.2010.083790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Schultz KA, Harris A, Messinger Y, et al. Ovarian tumors related to intronic mutations in DICER1: a report from the international ovarian and testicular stromal tumor registry. Fam Cancer 2016;15:105–10. 10.1007/s10689-015-9831-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Schultz KAP, Williams GM, Kamihara J, et al. DICER1 and associated conditions: identification of at-risk individuals and recommended surveillance strategies. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:2251–61. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES