Abstract
Introduction:
Cranial meningiomas considered one of most frequently encountered primary intracranial tumors in our daily neurosurgical practice, represent about 36% of brain neoplasms.
Aim:
In this cohort analysis, we investigated epidemiological features of brain meningiomas diagnosed at a single institution. Special highlighting has been dedicated to demographic features, foretelling radiological signs, and concomitant factors predictive of tumor atypia.
Material and Methods:
This retrospective analysis was conducted by revising all medical registries of patients aged ≥18 years, with a diagnosis of brain meningioma treated at King Hussein Medical Center, patients were retrieved from the electronic hospital database during a 12-year period (2004 to 2015). Preoperative radiology reports were examined to confirm tumor site and size based on largest measured dimension. Level of resection was based on surgical operative reports and post-operative radiological imaging.
Results:
A total of 665-patients operated for intracranial meningiomas were analyzed out of total 2047-patients operated for intracranial neoplasm during the same period. Demographic analysis showed; female to male ratio 2.4:1. Mean age 49.6-years. Average follow-up of 8.7 years. Tumor locations were classified as parasagittal (39.55%), convexity (27.52%), tentorial/ falx (6.17%), intraventricular (2.04%). Mean tumor size was 3,86 cm and tumor size was >4.5cm in (28. 07%) of cases. In this study we achieved gross total resection in (73.1%) of cases, subtotal resection in (22.6%). The majority of patients evolved favorably with respect to their neurological examination post-operatively, though a neurological deficit persisted in 64-cases and 16-cases developed a new neurological deficit. Ninety five cases developed recurrence during the observation period. Surgical mortality was reported in 11-cases in the immediate post-operative period and in 42-cases further cases during the observation period related to other causes.
Conclusion:
Neurosurgery faces a large number of intracranial meningioma patients in daily practice. Because of its “benign” nature; the variability in management strategy, Neurosurgery is more and more challenged with the concern of intracranial meningioma treatment in the daily practice. Because of its “benign” nature; the variability in management strategy, research regarding the meningioma etiology and epidemiology has lagged behind that for more malignant intracranial neoplasms. These risk factors piloted a revitalization in the study of meningiomas.
Keywords: Meningioma, Grade II meningioma, Radiosurgery, Atypical Meningioma
1. INTRODUCTION
Meningiomas are mesenchymal tumors that originate from the arachnoid cells of the leptomeninges casing the central nervous system (1-10). Meningiomas are the most frequently encountered primary intracranial tumors in most neurosurgical practice, represent about 36% of brain neoplasms in adults (11-20). However, these tumors may also occur in children, meningiomas in pediatric population account for < 1% of all meningiomas (21-27). Adult incidence peaks between the ages of 60 to70 years and the female to male ratio is about 3:2 (28). The most frequent locations are parasagittal, lateral convexity, the sphenoid wings, anterior fossa close to the olfactory nerve, the sellar region, and the posterior fossa and foramen magnum, respectively (28, 29-32). Large and enlarging meningiomas can cause significant mass effect, but these tumors do not typically invade the surrounding brain structures due to the pial-glial basement membrane bound. They usually present with seizures or with clinical symptoms that slowly evolve over time, though the severity of the symptoms and prognosis is heavily dependent on the tumor’s histologic heterogeneity, its location and size (3, 10).
Histologically most meningiomas are benign. Meningiomas are classified based on the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system into three histological grades (1, 2, 3) and 15 subtypes (30, 31). High grade meningiomas are rare, accounting for less than 5% of all meningiomas (16). Histologic grade has a noteworthy influence on prognosis, risk of recurrence, and the need for adjuvant therapy (7).
2. AIM
In this analysis, we examined the epidemiological features of brain meningiomas diagnosed and treated at a single institution. Special emphasis is given to demographic features, the cardinal predictive radiographic features, surgical management, concomitant histopathological prognosticators (e.g. tumor atypia) and the clinical impact of these factors, including risk factors related to the tumor treatment itself.
3. MATERIAL AND METHODS
This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing all medical records of patients aged ≥18 years, with a pathological diagnosis of brain meningioma treated at King Hussein Medical Center (Amman, Jordan) over a 12-year period (2004 to 2015). Patients’ clinical entries and radiographic data were retrieved from the electronic hospital database for analysis. Patients: younger than 18-years of age; those lost during follow-up and patients with extracranial meningiomas were excluded. Demographic features assessed were; sex, age, tumor location, histopathological grading, size of tumor, extent of resection, any post-operative history of radiation therapy, and documented recurrences.
Preoperative radiology analytical observations (CT post contrast and/or MRI T1 axial cuts post gadolinium) were used to confirm tumor location and size based on measuring tumor size in more than one plane and to evaluate peritumoral signal changes, largest single dimension, pre-surgical CT imaging used to assess for bony invasion. Extent of resection was based on surgical operative notes and post-operative imaging.
Surgical details
After induction and general anesthesia, the patient is positioned supine with the head positioned according to the pre-planned approach. Brain relaxation and control of intracranial pressure maintained using dehydrating agents and moderate hyperventilation prior to and during surgery. One burr hole performed as initial step, then we perform circle craniotomy around the lesion. If no tumor in the bone flap, we keep it for replacement, if involved we send it for biopsy and we perform cranioplasty. The dura beneath the flap if not involved opened in flap fashion and then re-sutured. The abnormal dura around the tumor usually resected and if need a dural patch is placed. Our strategy is always to aim for gross total resection (Simpson 1-2).
4. RESULTS
Our cohort consisted of 665 adult patients operated for pathologically confirmed intracranial meningioma. Demographic analysis revealed female to male ratio of 2.4:1. Mean age of the cohort was 49.6-years, ranging from 22-87 years, while mean age for male patients was 58.67, for female patients mean age was 43.12 (Table 1). Mean follow up after clinical diagnosis was 104-months (ranging between 34-168 months). Tumor locations were: parasagittal (39.55%), convexity (27.52%), tentorial/falx (6.17%), posterior fossa meningiomas (8.27%) and intraventricular (2.04%)
Table. 1. Demographic features and leading signs and symptoms of atypical meningioma diagnosed in our department.
| Parameter | Number |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 201 |
| female | 464 |
| Age | |
| >55 | 247 |
| <55 | 418 |
| Clinical Presentation | |
| Seizures | 242 |
| Headache | 427 |
| Mental status alteration | 113 |
| Focal signs | 135 |
| Nausea/vomiting/dizziness | 328 |
Linear growth assessment done by measuring the largest linear axis of the tumor in any direction on at least two MRI images cuts (axial, coronal, and sagittal). Patients were categorized into three group by using the average greatest single dimension. Tumor size was >4.5cm in 28. 07% of patients (Table 2).
Table 2. Topographic and radiological features of meningioma diagnosed in our center.
| Locations | ||
|---|---|---|
| parasagittal regions | 263 | 39.55% |
| cerebral convexity | 183 | 27.52 % |
| cerebral falx/ tentorium | 41 | 6.17 % |
| sphenoid ridge | 39 | 5.86 % |
| middle cranial fossa | 43 | 6.47 % |
| olfactory groove | 54 | 8.12 % |
| cerebellar convexity | 15 | 2.25 % |
| suprasellar | 14 | 2.11 % |
| intraventricular | 13 | 2.04 % |
| multiple | 27 | 4.60 % |
| Peri-tumoral edema | ||
| no | 213 | 32.03 % |
| mild(<2cm) | 268 | 40.3 % |
| medium (2-4cm) | 137 | 20.60 % |
| severe (>4cm) | 47 | 7.10 % |
| Texture | ||
| homogeneous | 376 | 56.54 % |
| calcified | 179 | 27.07 % |
| necrotic | 52 | 7.82 % |
| cystic | 35 | 5.27 % |
| hemorrhagic | 23 | 3.50 % |
| mixed | 67 | 10. 10 % |
| Size (cm) (mean 4.72 cm) | ||
| ≤2.5 | 184 | 27.70 % |
| 2.5-4.5 | 295 | 44.40 % |
| ≥4.5 | 186 | 28.07 % |
Clinically, majority of patients (64.21%) presented with headache and seizure activity (36.39%) which were the dominant complaints, other presentations; neurological deficit, hearing loss, visual disturbances (Table 1).
All patients were clinically monitored with an average post-surgical follow-up of 8.7 years. Contrasted MRI was performed for follow up every 6-months in those with histologically verified grade II meningioma, or if any change in clinical presentation developed. All these patients underwent surgical resection at one stage of follow-up either due to the tumor size (larger than 4.5 cm) or due to the clinical symptoms. In this study we achieved gross total resection in 73.1% of cases, subtotal resection in 22.6%, and 4.3% had unknown extent of surgical resection. All evolved favorably with respect to their post-surgical neurological examination, except 64-cases that had a persistent deficit, 16/665-cases developed a new neurological deficit. Ninety five cases developed a recurrence during the post-operative observation period, 67-cases underwent re-do sessions, while 20- cases underwent adjuvant radiotherapy and 8-cases were subjects to stereotactic radio surgery SRS. Surgical mortality reported in 11-cases in immediate post-operative period (within 30-days) and 42- patients passed away during the follow-up period due to other causes (e.g. pulmonary embolism).
Histopathological assessment showed: 410-patients with WHO grade 1, 199-patients with WHO grade 2, and 56-patients with WHO grade 3 meningiomas.
5. DISCUSSION
Meningioma is considered the most common primary central nervous system tumor. Typically these tumors are histologically benign (14). The estimated annual incidence of intracranial meningiomas is 1.2–3.1/100,000 population and the prevalence of pathologically-confirmed meningioma in the United States is approximately 97.5/100,000 with over 170,000 individuals currently being diagnosed with this tumor (8, 33-35). The documented ratio of female: male patients is approximately 2:1 and may be inverted for rare pre-pubertal meningiomas (18, 23, 34). This study revealed 464/665 cases observed among female-patients. In the female group, mean age was 42.5 years, which is considerably lower than the mean age of the entire cohort.
Clinically, symptoms from meningiomas are determined by the location of the mass and by the time course over which the tumor develops. Meningiomas are considered slow growing neoplasm and remain often asymptomatic for long times. They can grow anywhere along the dura matter, most frequently contained within the skull and at sites of dural reflection (falx cerebri, tentorium cerebelli) (32). Other sporadic sites include the optic nerve sheath and choroid plexus; roughly 10 percent arise in the spine. Seldom, meningiomas can also arise at extradural sites (21). The signs and symptoms found prominently in our study were focal signs, followed by mental status alteration, seizures, and headache. Notably, a considerable part was serendipitously diagnosed (Table 1).
Radiological imaging is crucial in both pre-operative evaluation of tumor size and post-operative tumor resection extent and recurrence. In order to assess and measure the tumor size; growth ideally, volumetric analysis is the best method; second best is 3D measures (33). In our center we use the linear growth assessment done by measuring the maximum linear diameter of the tumor in any direction on at least two MRI images cuts (axial, coronal, and sagittal). The typical characteristics on CT and MRI images include a dural tail, peri-tumoral edema, hyperostosis/bony infiltration, and calcifications which are all important and features which bear relevance for prognosis (32) (Figure 1). Noteworthy associations have been found between histological atypia/higher histological grade and observed tumor size (>40mm), shape, localization (base of skull), presence of brain invasion, and the existence of peri-tumoral edema (6, 15, 22, 25, 26). The radiographic growth rate of intracranial meningiomas has been reported as 2.4–5.3 mm per year, depending on mitotic activity as well as initial size (26, 27, 36). Other studies have reported that hyper intensity on T2-weighted imaging, a non-skull base location and the absence of calcification on radiographic imaging are positive indicators of accelerated tumor growth in intracranial meningiomas (12, 13).
Figure.1. Coronal and axial contrasted MRI images showing the extensive peri-tumorl edema surrounding the atypical meningioma.

Cardinal concomitant factors indicating higher histological grade in this cohort analysis were: massive peri-tumoral edema; high proliferation index (Ki-67); large tumor size and distinct texture (Table 2).
The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system categorizes meningiomas into three histological grades (1-2-3) and 15 subtypes (19, 30). The histopathological classification of meningiomas is powerful herald for its natural history, with higher grades associated with faster growth and greater rates of morbidity and mortality. However, clinical outcome in a subset of patients lies beyond the assigned pathologic grade for the respective tumor (5, 19, 30). Patients with atypical meningiomas seem to have a worse prognosis than patients with benign (WHO Grade I) meningiomas. Unfortunately, there still is limited understanding of the pathological risk factors that affect long-term tumor control following combined treatment with surgery and radiation therapy. Brain and/or bone involvement, and a high mitotic index significantly predicted an increased risk of treatment failure despite combination therapy (17). The presence of clinical symptoms and any observed tumor growth are main determining factors which permeate the clinical decision-making strategy (5, 29). Standard of care typically invokes surgical resection for the majority of these cases.
In general, complete surgical resection without compromise of neurological function confers the best prognosis for the patient, achieves the best quality of life for the patient and reduces the risk of recurrence. The extent of resection is commonly graded according to Simpson (24). However, there remains significant controversy regarding the role of adjuvant radiotherapy for even completely resected grade II tumors, the optimal timing and approach for such radiation therapy in various clinical settings. Various trials to address this problem are currently undertaken. Of note, the various in management strategies for intermediate grade meningiomas are further complicated by shifts in diagnostic criteria over time (2, 4, 11, 24, 33, 34).
Recent reports supports that adjuvant radiotherapy even after Simpson Grade I, II, or III resection was found to improves local control for atypical meningiomas (6, 22). Although, some authors advocate observation alone after gross resection of atypical meningioma, this was not associated with increased risk of tumor recurrence or mortality (21). In our series we achieved a gross total resection in 61% of cases, subtotal resections in 33.4%, and 5.6% of cases had undergone an unknown extent of resection (Figure 3).
Figure.3. Post-contrast, axial cuts, pre-and post-operative MRI, showing total resection.

Our strategy until 2013, was to offer adjuvant radiotherapy in higher grade lesions based on empiric experience. Nowadays, in cases in which we achieve microscopic complete resection and without recurrence on regular 6-month follow-up radiological images, we observe. Relapsing patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy. Our analysis revealed 19/665 cases developed a recurrence, 13-cases had previous STR and 4 cases had GTR
6. CONCLUSION
Contemporary Neurosurgery remains challenged with the quest for best intracranial meningioma management in daily practice. Although the vast majority of meningiomas are benign, higher histological grade reported with increasing frequency. Because of their mostly “benign” nature; and significant variation in management, research in meningioma epidemiology and etiology has lagged behind that of malignant intracranial neoplasms. However, newly identified risk factors ushered a renaissance in the study of meningiomas. The archetypical demographics of these tumors; younger age group, gross total resection is crucial for recurrence, adjuvant radiotherapy is still controversial.
Figure.2. Histopathological slides showing: a- Meningioma with high mitotic activity (only one HPF shown), b- Meningioma with focus of necrosis, c- Meningioma with sheet like growth, small cells with high N/C ration and prominent nucleoli.
Author’s contribution:
Each author gave substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work in acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. Each author had a part in article preparing for drafting or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and each author gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Financial support and sponsorship:
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ahmed RA, Shebl AM, Habashy HO. Expression levels of beta-catenin and galectin-3 in meningioma and their effect on brain invasion and recurrence: a tissue microarray study. Cancer biology & medicine. 2017;14(3):319–326. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alghamdi M, Li H, Olivotto I, Easaw J, Kelly J, Nordal R, et al. Atypical Meningioma: Referral Patterns, Treatment and Adherence to Guidelines. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. 2017;44(3):283–287. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2016.449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Backer-Grøndahl T, Moen BH, Arnli MB, Torseth K, Torp SH. Immunohistochemical characterization of brain-invasive meningiomas. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:7206–7219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bagshaw HP, Burt LM, Jensen RL, Suneja G, Palmer CA, Couldwell WT, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for atypical meningiomas. Journal of neurosurgery. 2017;126(6):1822–1828. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS152809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bi WL, Dunn IF. Current and emerging principles in surgery for meningioma. Chinese clinical oncology. 2017;6(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.21037/cco.2017.06.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boeker DK, Meurer H, Gullotta F. Recurring intracranial meningiomas. Evaluation of some factors predisposing for tumor recurrence. J Neurosurg Sci. 1985;29:11–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta neuropathologica. 2016;131(6):803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States. Hisdale: CBTRUS (2009–2010) CDTRUS Statistical Report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in eighteen states in 2002-2006. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dudley RWR, Torok MR, Randall S, Beland B, Handler MH, Mulcahy-Levy JM, et al. Pediatric versus adult meningioma: comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2018;137(3):621–629. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2756-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fric R, Hald JK, Antal EA. Benign Sphenoid Wing Meningioma Presenting with an Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage–A Case Report. Journal of central nervous system disease. 2016;8:1–4. doi: 10.4137/JCNSD.S33653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Graffeo CS, Leeper HE, Perry A, Uhm JH, Lachance DJ, Brown PD, et al. Revisiting Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Gross Total Resection of World Health Organization Grade II Meningioma. World neurosurgery. 2017;103:655–663. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hashiba T, Hashimoto N, Izumoto S, Suzuki T, Kagawa N, Maruno M, Kato A, Yoshimine T. Serial volumetric assessment of the natural history and growth pattern of incidentally discovered meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:675–684. doi: 10.3171/2008.8.JNS08481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hashimoto N, Rabo CS, Okita Y, Kinoshita M, Kagawa N, Fujimoto Y, Morii E, Kishima H, Maruno M, Kato A, Yoshimine T. Slower growth of skull base meningiomas compared with non-skull base meningiomas based on volumetric and biological studies. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:574–580. doi: 10.3171/2011.11.JNS11999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hortobagyi T, Bencze J, Varkoly G, Kouhsari MC, Klekner A. Meningioma recurrence. Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) 2016;11(1):168–173. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ildan F, Erman T, Göçer AI, Tuna M, Bagğdatogğlu H, Cetinalp E, et al. Predicting the probability of meningioma recurrence in the preoperative and early postoperative period: a multivariate analysis in the midterm follow-up. Skull Base. 2007;17:157–171. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kessler RA, Garzon-Muvdi T, Yang W, Weingart J, Olivi A, Huang J, et al. Metastatic Atypical and Anaplastic Meningioma: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. World neurosurgery. 2017;101:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim D, Niemierko A, Hwang WL, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Curry WT, Barker FG, 2nd, et al. Histopathological prognostic factors of recurrence following definitive therapy for atypical and malignant meningiomas. Journal of neurosurgery. 2017:1–10. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS16913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li X, Zhao J. Intracranial meningiomas of childhood and adolescence: report of 34 cases with follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25:1411–1417. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0949-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, Von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee W K, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maillo A, Orfao A, Espinosa AB, Sayagués JM, Merino M, Sousa P, et al. Early recurrences in histologically benign/grade I meningiomas are associated with large tumors and coexistence of monosomy 14 and del(1p36) in the ancestral tumor cell clone. Neuro Oncol. 2007;9:438–446. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2007-026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mattox A, Hughes B, Oleson J, Reardon D, McLendon R, Adamson C. Treatment recommendations for primary extradural meningiomas. Cancer. 2011;117(1):24–38. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McCarthy BJ, Davis FG, Freels S, Surawicz TS, Damek DM, Grutsch J, et al. Factors associated with survival in patientswith meningioma. J. Neurosurg. 1998;88:831–839. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Menon G, Nair S, Sudhir J, Rao BR, Mathew A, Bahuleyan B. Childhood and adolescent meningiomas: a report of 38 cases and review of literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:239–244. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0206-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moraes FY, Chung C. Radiation for skull base meningiomas: review of the literature on the approach to radiotherapy. Chinese clinical oncology. 2017;6(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.21037/cco.2017.06.08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nakasu S, Nakasu Y, Nakajima M, Matsuda M, Handa J. Preoperative identification of meningiomas that are highly likely to recur. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:455–462. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Niiro M, Yatsushiro K, Nakamura K, Kawahara Y, Kuratsu J. Natural history of elderly patients with asymptomatic meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68:25–28. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Olivero WC, Lister JR, Elwood PW. The natural history and growth rate of asymptomatic meningiomas: A review of 60 patients. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:222–224. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the united states in 2007-2011. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16(Suppl 4):1–63. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Oya S, Kawai K, Nakatomi H, Saito N. Significance of Simpson grading system in modern meningioma surgery: integration of the grade with MIB-1 labeling index as a key to predict the recurrence of WHO Grade I meningiomas. Journal of neurosurgery. 2012;117(1):121–128. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS111945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Perry A, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, Budka H, von Deimling A. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, cavenee WK, editors. IARC. Lyon: 2007. pp. 164–172. Meningiomas. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Riemenschneider MJ, Perry A, Reifenberger G. Histological classification and molecular genetics of meningiomas. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:1045–1054. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70625-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Uduma UF, Emejulu JC. Intracranial meningiomas in the present era of modern neuroimaging: diagnostic and management options, with radiological illustrations. Orient J Med. 2013;25:67–74. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Van Havenbergh T, Carvalho G, Tatagiba M, Plets C, Samii M. Natural history of petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:55–62. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200301000-00006. discussion 62-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Whittle IR, Smith C, Navoo P, Collie D. Meningiomas. Lancet (London, England) 2004;363(9420):1535–1543. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16153-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB. Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol. 2010;99:307. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0386-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yamamoto J, Takahashi M, Idei M, Nakano Y, Soejima Y, Akiba D, et al. Clinical features and surgical management of intracranial meningiomas in the elderly. Oncology letters. 2017;14(1):909–917. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yoneoka Y, Fujii Y, Tanaka R. Growth of incidental meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000;142:507–511. doi: 10.1007/s007010050463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

