Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2018 Nov 10;116(1):104–119. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.006

Architectural Dynamics of CaMKII-Actin Networks

Shahid Khan 1,3,, Kenneth H Downing 2, Justin E Molloy 3
PMCID: PMC6341221  PMID: 30527447

Abstract

Calcium-calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) has an important role in dendritic spine remodeling upon synaptic stimulation. Using fluorescence video microscopy and image analysis, we investigated the architectural dynamics of rhodamine-phalloidin stabilized filamentous actin (F-actin) networks cross-linked by CaMKII. We used automated image analysis to identify F-actin bundles and crossover junctions and developed a dimensionless metric to characterize network architecture. Similar networks were formed by three different CaMKII species with a 10-fold length difference in the linker region between the kinase domain and holoenzyme hub, implying linker length is not a primary determinant of F-actin cross-linking. Electron micrographs showed that at physiological molar ratios, single CaMKII holoenzymes cross-linked multiple F-actin filaments at random, whereas at higher CaMKII/F-actin ratios, filaments bundled. Light microscopy established that the random network architecture resisted macromolecular crowding with polyethylene glycol and blocked ATP-powered compaction by myosin-II miniature filaments. Importantly, the networks disassembled after the addition of calcium-calmodulin and were then spaced within 3 min into compacted foci by myosin motors or more slowly (30 min) aggregated by crowding. Single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy showed CaMKII dissociation from surface-immobilized globular actin exhibited a monoexponential dwell-time distribution, whereas CaMKII bound to F-actin networks had a long-lived fraction, trapped at crossover junctions. Release of CaMKII from F-actin, triggered by calcium-calmodulin, was too rapid to measure with flow-cell exchange (<20 s). The residual bound fraction was reduced substantially upon addition of an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor peptide analog but not ATP. These results provide mechanistic insights to CaMKII-actin interactions at the collective network and single-molecule level. Our findings argue that CaMKII-actin networks in dendritic spines maintain spine size against physical stress. Upon synaptic stimulation, CaMKII is disengaged by calcium-calmodulin, triggering network disassembly, expansion, and subsequent compaction by myosin motors with kinetics compatible with the times recorded for the poststimulus changes in spine volume.

Introduction

The calcium-calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) is a multifunctional, dodecameric kinase assembly. It is ubiquitous in the animal kingdom and has key roles in learning and cardiovascular function. The role in learning has been studied in vertebrate rat models of memory (1, 2), and its effects on dendritic morphology and synaptic localization in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans have been described (3). CaMKII is important both in long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression, with the biochemical mechanisms best understood for LTP in hippocampal neurons (4). A direct structural role of CaMKII in dendritic spines has been proposed (5, 6, 7), consistent with its high (>0.1 mM) abundance (8) and actin-binding affinity as well as its kinase activity. The dendritic spine cytoskeleton is composed overwhelmingly of filamentous actin (F-actin). Actin binding by CaMKII and its abrogation by calcium-bound calmodulin (i.e., calcium-calmodulin) is central to spine remodeling during early LTP (9, 10). Here, we characterize the interactions of CaMKII in synthetic F-actin networks (i.e., CaMKII-actin networks) to better understand the structural role of CaMKII in maintenance and remodeling of the dendritic spine cytoskeleton.

The actin-binding properties of the rat isoforms have been the most studied (Fig. 1 A). The variable intervening linkers in the rat CaMKII β-isoform (βrat; residues 316–405) (11)) between the conserved canonical kinase domain (KD) and association domains (ADs) are an actin-binding determinant because affinity scales with linker length as reported by pull-down assays and electron microscopy (EM) of the sedimented bundles (7, 12, 13). The 90-residue βRat linker, named actin-binding domain (7), has an established role in actin binding, but isoforms with shorter linkers also bind actin (αRat: about 25 residues (14)) and form F-actin networks (γRat: about 40 residues), with γRat reported to bundle F-actin differently than βRat (15). It is not known whether there is a common binding surface for both globular actin (G-actin) and F-actin or whether the architecture of CaMKII-actin networks fits the characterization of CaMKII as an “actin-bundling” protein (7).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

For a Figure360 author presentation of Fig. 1, see the figure legend at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.006.

(A) Rat isoforms. Subunits are distinguished by the length and composition of their linkers between the KD and AD. (B) Holoenzyme; Dodecamer with stacked hexamer rings. Linker extensions regulate kinase co-operativity possibly by controlling access of calcium-calmodulin to its R (regulatory segment (red))-binding motif. The dominant extended form of the autoinhibited CaMKII holoenzyme visualized by cryoelectron tomography of the rat α-isoform is shown (with permission from (20)). (C) Stimulus-dependent remodeling of the spine cytoskeleton. Spine morphology is shown in its initial (i) maximally expanded (ii) and stable end states (iii) after synaptic stimulation. (i) to (ii): transient (subsecond) calcium influx triggers calmodulin-mediated CaMKII activation, dissociation from F-actin (red), and sequestration to the PSD. CaMKII kinase activity orchestrates actin polymerization (F-actin; pink) to expand the cytoskeleton. ABP, actin binding protein. Compaction may be powered by PSD-localized myosin miniature-filament formation mediated by MLCK kinase activation. (ii) to (iii): as intracellular calcium returns to basal levels, compaction of the expanded cytoskeleton by myosin is completed and stabilized by the attachment of CaMKII that has entered from the shaft. Horizontal bars denote time stamps for the states, whereas the vertical bars mark relative spine head volumes.

Figure360: An Author Presentation of Fig. 1
Download video file (88.7MB, mp4)

Holoenzyme architecture is conserved between species, with the KDs arrayed around a central AD hub (Fig. 1 B). Autoinhibited states that bind actin have an incomplete ATP binding site blocked by a pseudo-substrate regulatory sequence (βRat275–315 segmented into R1275–291, R2292–298, and R3308–315) (16). The association of βrat to G-actin (2.4 μM affinity) (13) with neuronal F-actin cytoskeleton (17) is abolished by calcium-calmodulin, noted to be within 5 s in the latter study. G-actin occupancy is stoichiometric with the number of subunits in the βrat holoenzyme (13). Calcium-calmodulin binds to an R2 IQ-10 recognition motif to displace the regulatory sequence from the substrate-binding cleft, enabling its capture and R1 T287 transphosphorylation by an adjacent subunit whose regulatory sequence has also been displaced by calcium-calmodulin. This capture process (i.e., subunit capture) is essential for kinase activation (18, 19). Linker length is also known to regulate kinase cooperativity (18). Thus, the linkers could control access of calcium-calmodulin to its binding motif in autoinhibited holoenzymes as well as in multivalent holoenzyme interactions with F-actin by limiting the extension of KDs out from the central hub. Three-dimensional cryoelectron tomography has reported three distinct autoinhibited αRat holoenzyme populations: a dominant (>60%) population with extended KDs, and compact monomer (<30%), and paired dimer (<20%) populations (20). Accordingly, we used the structurally characterized C. elegans CaMKII “d”-isoform (dC. elegans) (18) and the human CaMKIIβ-isoform (βHum) (21) that have threefold shorter and longer linkers than βRat, respectively, to vary linker length over a large range to evaluate the role of linker length as a molecular determinant for CaMKII network formation and response to calcium-calmodulin.

Early LTP after calcium influx upon synaptic stimulation is defined by localized changes in the size of the stimulated spine. Calcium transients (<0.1 s) triggered by the photorelease of glutamate (22) cause expansion (3× basal volume) followed by compaction to a final size (1.5×) within 3 min (Fig. 1 C). The volume increase has been described as a “synaptic tag” (23, 24) because it is maintained for >1 h by as yet unknown mechanisms that direct the insertion of additional N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)/α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptors at the postsynaptic membrane (PSD) at the synapse.

Single-particle tracking (SPT) of CaMKII reported three kinetic subpopulations in spines, with the major immobile subpopulation attached to the actin cytoskeleton (5, 25). Actin treadmilling, concomitantly monitored by photoactivation of PaGFP-actin with glutamate photorelease, revealed dynamic (<1 min time constant) and stable, enlarged (∼17 min time constant) F-actin pools. CaMKII inhibitors blocked formation of the latter pool (26). Thus, CaMKII determines the stability of the spine cytoskeleton. A stable cytoskeleton is essential to distinguish the volume of the stimulated spine from adjacent spines that do not change size. Thus, a central architectural role of CaMKII-actin networks, investigated in this study, could be the suppression of spontaneous volume fluctuations caused by osmotic imbalance and myosin motor forces that degrade the stimulus-induced volume difference between stimulated and nonstimulated spines. Reconciliation of the measured, weak actin-binding affinity with the long-term (>1 h) stability of CaMKII-actin networks in vivo needed to measure this difference is an important related issue.

There is evidence that the initial expansion during early LTP is due to actin polymerization, to which increased barbed ends because of F-actin severing proteins such as cofilin (23), F-actin fragmentation by membrane-associated myosin motors (27), and G-actin dissociation from CaMKII by calcium-calmodulin (15) could all contribute. In contrast, factors responsible for the subsequent compaction remain to be identified. An attractive hypothesis, formalized in a recent model (28), is that compaction is driven by the sarcomeric myosin-II isoform MyH7B tethered to PSD-associated SynGap/PSD-95/NMDA receptor complexes (29), consistent with the enlargement of spine size upon MyH7B knockdown (30). Myosin-IIb also regulates PSD size (31, 32) and could be an alternative motor. Another possibility is that osmotic depletion forces alone are sufficient for compaction of the newly polymerized F-actin. We sought to discriminate among these possibilities as well as understand how calcium-calmodulin dissociation of the CaMKII holoenzymes from F-actin is coupled to the cytoskeletal response to physical forces.

Responses of actin networks to crowding agents and myosin motors have been characterized previously (33, 34, 35, 36, 37). Here, we exploited these in vitro assays to assess whether motor and/or osmotic forces may drive the compaction phase of early LTP. We developed quantitative measures of network architecture and combined network analysis with single-molecule measurements of CaMKII association with G- and F-actin to understand how calcium-calmodulin-triggered dissociation of CaMKII is coupled to architectural dynamics the transition from a stable to dynamic network. We report that CaMKII cross-linked actin networks have sufficient mechanical resilience to maintain a rigid, stable architecture but disassemble rapidly in response to a calcium-calmodulin pulse. The disassembled F-actin is remodeled by myosin motor forces with kinetics consistent with the reported changes in stimulated spine volume. We document that, in contrast to kinase cooperativity, network architectural dynamics are relatively insensitive to linker length. Our results have general relevance for CaMKII-guided cytoskeletal modeling in other organs and tissues populated by non-neuronal isoforms.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Actin antibody specific to the C-terminus of α-actin, no. A5060 (rabbit), was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Monoclonal GFP antibody no. 1814460 (mouse) was purchased from Roche (Basel, Switzerland), and the GFP protein, no. 8365-1, was from Clontech (Mountain View, CA). A 21-residue peptide, tatCN21, homologous to the NMDA type GluN2B receptor subunit (38), was a gift from Dr. Ulli Bayer. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) (MW 3KD) was from Sigma.

Buffer stocks for fluorescence assays were AB (25 mM imidazole-HCl, 25 mM KCl, 1 mM EGTA, and 4 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.4)) and AB+ (as AB but with additional 2 mM ATP). Ca2+/AB and Ca2+/AB+ contained 0.2 mM CaCl2 in place of 1 mM EGTA. Calmodulin, purified as detailed below, was used at 10 μM final concentration unless noted otherwise. Immediately before the experiments, an oxygen scavenger system was added to 1-mL aliquots of the relevant degassed buffers to reduce photobleaching. This comprised 20 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mg/mL glucose oxidase, 0.5 mg/mL catalase, 3 mg/mL glucose, and 0.5 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (final concentrations). PEG solutions were made in AB buffer with GOC.

The CaMKII proteins studied (Fig. 2 A) were chosen based on their interdomain linker properties and phylogenetic spread (Supporting Materials and Methods, Section A). The structurally characterized C. elegans CaMKII-d-isoform (dC. elegans) (18) has a threefold shorter linker than βRat, which in turn has a threefold shorter linker than the human CaMKIIβ-isoform (βHum) (21). The C. elegans splice variants were confined to a branch within the phylogenetic trees (monophyletic) for both the KD and linker domains in contrast to the rat and human CaMKII isoforms that were distributed over the trees. The linker domains of the three proteins shared sequence homology over two small segments: a previously identified core fragment (βRat 342KSLNNKKAD351 (11)) and another serine/threonine-rich 20-residue peptide at the βRat linker/AD interface (Fig. S1). The linkers were disordered, as assessed by DisoPred (39), so that linker compliance was proportional to linker length (Fig. S2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) CaMKII proteins used in the study. The three proteins (βrat = rat β-isoform, βHum = human β-isoform, dC. elegans = C. elegans splice variant d) were selected based on differences in linker lengths and phylogenetic spread. Single-molecule measurements utilized the GFP-tagged fusion of the rat β-isoform. (B) Network parameters. (i) SOAX representation of an F-actin network in 15% PEG showing snakes (purple filaments) and junctions (green spots) superimposed on the image. The parameters extracted from the SOAX were the junction density, interjunction separation (l(x)), and cable intensity (Q). The nearest-neighbor distance (rΝΝ) was computed from junction density and separation. (ii) Network architectures. Random network flanked by examples of aggregated and spaced networks are shown.

The rat CaMKIIβ-isoform (βRat) with an N-terminal endogenously biotinylated sequence (Avi tag) followed by a nine-residue flexible linker (3× Gly-Ala-Ser) was synthesized and cloned into plasmid pSMT3 (GENEWIZ). Plasmid pSMT3 contains a SUMO protease cleavage site downstream of an N-terminal His-6 tag. The GFP-tagged rat CaMKIiβ (GFP-βRat) has been described previously (14). The structurally and biochemically characterized C. elegans splice variant d (dC. elegans) (18) and the human β-isoform (21) were the two other CaMKII holoenzymes studied. Their subunits are expressed with N-terminal His-6 tags that are cleaved by prescission and SUMO protease, respectively. Further details on protein expression, purification, and negative-stain EM are in Supporting Materials and Methods, Section A.

Epifluorescence and total internal reflection fluorescence light microscopy

Epifluorescence microscopy assays studied rhodamine (Rh)-phalloidin (Ph) stabilized F-actin gels and their motile response to crowding and motor forces. The assays used a Zeiss Axioskop 40 upright fluorescence microscope (Oberkochen, Germany) (40) equipped with a 100-W mercury arc lamp, rhodamine filter set (Ex:525AF45, dichroic:560DRLP, Em:595AF60) (Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT), 100× Plan Neofluar (1.3 numerical aperture objective), and PTI IC300 image-intensified charge-coupled device camera (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). Camera magnification was 78 or 119 nm/pixel (selected using a 1.5× magnification lens). Video records were captured using a Euresys Picolo frame grabber card (Multipix Imaging, Petersfield, Hampshire, UK) and recorded onto a computer hard disk. Defined depth chambers were used to estimate GFP-βrat concentrations in extracts, with known GFP solutions as the calibration standard. Dual-color, single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) imaging studies were conducted using a Nikon Eclipse TE 2000U inverted microscope (Tokyo, Japan) as described previously (14) but with modifications.

Image analysis

Single particles

SPT was performed with GMimPro and further analyzed with Motility (41) software. Kymograph and colocalization analysis used ImageJ plugins. TIRF sample preparation, instrument modifications, and image analysis details are in Supporting Materials and Methods, Section B.

Networks

The SOAX program, based on Stretching Open Active Contours (42), was used for automated representation of the light microscopy (LM) imaged networks (sampling distance, c = 8 pixels (0.625 μm)). SOAX gave a map of the coordinates of filament crossover points (i.e., junctions) and outlines of the connecting cables (i.e., snakes) superimposed on the original image (Video S1). Snakes included both single filaments and bundles that could not be distinguished in the diffraction-limited images. SOAX parameters were iteratively optimized for maximal superposition of the map with the imaged network. Manual editing eliminated spurious snakes and fused neighboring junctions <1.2c apart. Junction centroids and all interjunction distances, lx, were determined from the map. Nearest-neighbor distances, rNN, were then obtained from the table of lx values using a custom script in R 3.3 (https://www.r-project.org/). The average near-neighbor distance, RNN, was computed from the observed number, N, of rNN values, expressed in μm:

RNN=rNN/N. (1)
Video S1. SOAX Representation of an F-Actin Network, Related to Fig. 2 A
Download video file (817.5KB, mp4)

The mean snake intensity, Q, was determined in detector counts per image pixel area. The skewness of the intensity distribution, S (0 for symmetric distribution with mean = mode), was computed in Microsoft Excel. Mean snake curvature, K, measured in radians per micrometers was computed in SOAX from the tangent differences, ΔT, at user-defined sampling distances, Δs, along the snake:

K=(1n)s=1nΔTΔs. (2)

Calculation of the persistence length (lp) from K assumed a worm-like chain:

P(K)=2lpcπ(exp(lpcK2/2)), (3)

where P(K) is the probability density distribution for K (further details are in (43)).

Our quantitative analysis of network type was based mainly on Q and RNN (Fig. 2 B), with lp used as a qualitative check only because it was systematically underestimated (Supporting Materials and Methods).

For networks compacted by myosin motors, the fluorescence foci comprising conglomerated F-actin were identified from binarized images by setting area (>50 μm2) and intensity thresholds using the particle analysis function in ImageJ version 1.5 (https://imagej.nih.gov). Foci centroid positions, interfoci distances (lx), and nearest-neighbor distances (rNN) were computed as above for the snake junctions to obtain the integrated intensity, Qfoci:

Qfoci=foci=1nAfociQfoci, (4)

where Afoci (pixel2) and Qfoci counts per pixel are the area and mean intensity for each of n foci in an image field of view, using the binarized image to mask all foci located on the original image.

RNN was used to characterize the network type by comparison against the expected value for a random (Poisson) distribution, rrand, at a given density of junctions, σ, per unit area. It has been shown that for a random distribution obtained when the position of any point is equiprobable and independent of all other points:

rrand=1/2σ. (5)

The limiting extreme divergences from the random distribution are an aggregated distribution, in which points coalesce and RNN approaches zero, and an optimally spaced distribution on a hexagonal point spacing (Fig. 2 B), where RNN=1.0796/ρ (44). Here, we define a randomness index, R = RNN/rrand, for our network architectures. R will vary from ∼0 for the aggregated case to unity for a random (noninteracting) network and up to 2.16 for the evenly spaced hexagonal lattice.

Results

Multivalent linkages by single holoenzymes connect CaMKII-actin networks

Negative-stain EM was used to resolve the interfilament F-actin connections by βRat holoenzymes in networks formed in the presence of physiological substoichiometric βRat/G-actin molar ratios (0.3) (Fig. 3 A). The networks were a composite of two structural elements (i.e., crossover junctions and bundles) in addition to free single filaments. The βRat holoenzymes localized preferentially at junctions and along bundles when mixed with synthetic F-actin. Multiple filaments were connected dominantly by single holoenzymes at junctions rather than aggregates. Proteolysis of the unstructured linker (Fig. S3 A) resulted in smaller AD hubs and cleaved KD complexes in addition to intact holoenzymes. The hubs did not localize at junctions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Architecture of βRat-actin networks. (A) (i) βRat and (ii) F-actin solutions form (iii) networks when mixed. Some holoenzymes are identified (blue circles). Boxes (45 nm) show image averages of the dominant subpopulations (top: holoenzymes (n = 21; 25.8 ± 0.8 nm); bottom: proteolyzed hubs (n = 15; 18.0 ± 0.3 nm)). (iii) Multiple (six) F-actin filaments joined by one holoenzyme (center; large blue circle). Junctions with two or three filaments formed by single holoenzymes (blue circles) are common. The box (45 nm) shows the image average of junction-localized βRat (n = 30; 24.0 ± 2.6 nm). (B) (iiii) βRat-actin networks. Junctions have one (blue circles) or two (green circles) holoenzymes.

We set up single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM) assays to test whether βrat holoenzymes attached more strongly at network junctions (i.e., “filament intersections”) consistent with the multiple attachments to actin filaments seen by EM. The GFP-βrat construct used has been extensively characterized in several laboratories, including ours (6, 12, 14). The GFP-βrat holoenzymes, once dissociated from binding targets, rapidly (<5 video frames (0.1 s)) diffuse out of the evanescent field, as detailed in an earlier publication (14). Henceforth, we use the term “cables” for both single filaments and bundles because filaments within a bundle cannot be resolved by LM. Network architecture was characterized based on two parameters: cable intensity (reported by the normalized pixel intensity (Q value) that increases with the number of bundled filaments for the diffraction-limited case) and nearest-neighbor junction distance RNN compared to that expected for a random network, rrand. The mean and the skewness, S, of the Q distribution gave a measure of bundling. The randomness parameter R computed from the ratio (RNN/rrand) reported the arrangement of the filament junctions. Individual GFP-βrat holoenzymes (10–50 nM concentration) appeared as diffraction-limited spots, which decorated the immobilized synthetic Rh-Ph F-actin filaments (Fig. 4 A; Video S2). We imaged areas enriched in F-actin bundles and junctions. The GFP-βrat spots localized preferentially at junctions and along the brighter cables. Kymographs were generated to analyze the single-particle dwell-time distribution of GFP-βrat holoenzymes that were localized along the F-actin (Fig. 4 B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Single-molecule binding to F- and G-actin. (A) (iiii) Averaged dual color TIRF of GFP-βRat holoenzymes (green spots) bound to Rh-Ph F-actin (red) filament aggregates (R = 0.58; S = 1.05). 20 frames/s video frame rates were used. AB/GOC buffer is shown. 100 frame averages are shown. Circles (white) mark GFP-βRat; bars (white) mark filament stretches decorated continuously with GFP-βRat. (B) (iiii) Kymographs of green fluorescent spots associated with actin filaments. Asterisks (red) mark spots at junctions. The duration (abscissa) of each kymograph is 20 s (400 frames). Length scale (white) represents 2 μm. Bound fraction (dwell time > 6 frames (0.3 s)) is 0.82 ± 0.11. (C) (i) GFP-βrat (green) molecules in the evanescent field adjacent to a surface layer of antibody immobilized Cy3 G-actin (red) molecules. (ii) Particle tracks superimposed on a snapshot of part of the image field (box area in (i)). (D) Values for koff were determined from single- or double-exponential best fits (lines) to dwell-time distributions. Subpopulations localized at junctions (open red circles; koff = 0.04 s−1) versus cables (solid red circles; rate = 0.43(exp (−1.2) + 0.56(exp (−0.06) s−1) are shown. The distribution of GFP-βrat track dwell times over the immobilized Cy3 G-actin fits single-exponential decay (white; k = 2.55s−1; R > 0.99) is shown. The vertical dashed line marks six-frame (0.3 s) “bound” spot threshold.

Video S2. TIRFM of GFP-βrat Association/Dissociation with F-Actin ((+/−) Calcium-Calmodulin), Related to Fig. 4 Aii and Fig. 5 Aii
Download video file (5.1MB, mp4)

We compared the F-actin GFP-βrat dwell-time distributions with those obtained with Cy3-labeled G-actin because GFP-βrat attachments with G-actin would only be monovalent in contrast to F-actin. The Cy3-actin was immobilized as a surface layer on actin antibody-coated glass. GFP-βrat formed a dense layer associated with the immobilized G-actin spots when perfused in (Fig. 4 C). The SPT dwell-time distribution was well fit by a single exponential, with off rate koff = 2.55 s−1(n > 1200). This value provided an estimate of the monovalent koff. In contrast, analysis of the kymographs (Fig. 4 D) for the GFP-βrat associating with the F-actin network revealed a long-tailed multiexponential decay. Junction-localized CaMKII had substantially longer dwell times (slower koff) than the rest of the population, implying that the steady-state observation of preferential CaMKII localization at junctions was due to slower dissociation. These results are most simply explained by the idea that the rotationally symmetric holoenzyme forms multivalent attachments with multiple filaments at network junctions. Detachment from all filaments, which is required for dissociation from a junction, should take longer than detachment from G-actin. In the case of single filaments, single attachments will constitute the dominant fraction. In cables with two or more filaments, higher-valency attachments will also be common. The mean GFP-βrat spot intensity measured at actin-filament junctions was not significantly greater than the average intensity of spots localized at other points along F-actin, consistent with the EM evidence that junctions are predominantly formed by single holoenzymes.

Single-molecule assays of dissociation by calcium-calmodulin

The rapid dissociation of activated CaMKII from the actin cytoskeleton for phosphorylation of PSD targets and G-actin for stimulating polymerization is central to models, advocating a primary role for CaMKII in the LTP spine volume change. Therefore, we measured the GFP-βrat dissociation from both F-actin and G-actin triggered by calcium-calmodulin. When a mixture of calmodulin/GFP-βrat (in Ca2+⋅AB buffer) was perfused onto the F-actin immobilized in the flow cell, GFP-βrat decoration at both cables and junctions was substantially reduced within the time taken to complete the buffer exchange (∼20 s) (Fig. 5, Ai and Aii). This result implies that calcium-calmodulin activates and releases CaMKII rapidly enough to orchestrate the volume increase of stimulated spines. A residual GFP-βrat fraction remained bound to F-actin. This fraction was unaffected by subsequent perfusion of calmodulin/GFP-βrat with ATP (Ca2+ ⋅ AB+ buffer). We then used the peptide tCN21, an analog of the NMDA receptor, to explore whether the receptor interaction would reduce the residual bound fraction (Fig. 5 Aiii; Video S2). This fraction was indeed reduced when tCN21 was perfused with calmodulin/GFP-βrat (Ca2+ ⋅ AB buffer). Threefold higher GFP-βrat concentrations in the mixture relative to those used in the absence of tCN21 were necessary to obtain dwell-time distributions with acceptable statistics of spots bound longer than the five-frame threshold. This concentration difference is evident from comparison of the kymographs obtained for GFP-βrat-spot dwell times in the absence (Fig. 5 B) and presence of tCN21 (Fig. 5 C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Dual-color TIRF of GFP-βRat holoenzymes (green spots) associated with F-actin in the presence of (i and ii) calcium-calmodulin and (iii) calcium-calmodulin with tCN21 peptide; tow frame averages. Kymographs (20-s duration) of GFP-βRat spots associated with F-actin in the presence of calcium-calmodulin ((B) (iiv)) and (C) (iiv)) calcium-calmodulin with tCN21 peptide. (D) (i) A TIRF image of GFP-βRat molecules over a surface of immobilized Cy3 G-actin molecules. Concentrations and experimental conditions as in Fig. 4C but in the presence of calcium-calmodulin are shown. (ii) The kymograph (circle in (ii); 3-μm diameter) shows transient interaction of GFP-βrat particle with a Cy3-actin molecule (demarcated). (E) Distributions of bound-control (red), calcium-calmodulin (blue; koff = 0.78 (exp (−3.1) + 0.22(exp (−1.4) s−1), and calcium-calmodulin (+tCN21) (green; koff = 1.0 s−1) treated populations above the six-frame (0.3 s) threshold. The inset shows fractions of [(bound spots (>6 frames threshold))/(Total spots)] − 0.82 ± 0.11 (control), 0.73 ± 0.09 (calcium-calmodulin), and 0.30 ± 0.01 (calcium-calmodulin + tCN21).

Similarly, there was a dramatic decrease relative to control experiments (Fig. 4 C) in the number of GFP-βrat spots adjacent to immobilized Cy3-actin surface layers in the presence of calcium-calmodulin (Fig. 5 Di) with high background fluorescence due to distant particles outside the field. A few GFP-βrat particles diffused in and out of the evanescent field with brief stationary episodes in proximity to G-actin spots as realized by kymograph analysis (n = 12). An example kymograph is shown (Fig. 5 Dii). The difference between Cy3-actin experiments with and without calcium-calmodulin is best appreciated from the video records (Video S3). Alternatively, anti-GFP antibody-coated glass coverslips immobilized GFP-βrat molecules that remained visible as diffraction-limited spots when the extract was replaced with AB. Multiple Cy3-actin molecules, as assessed by the Q value, colocalized with a dominant fraction of the GFP spots when Cy3-actin solutions were then perfused in. Perfusion of calmodulin (Ca2+ ⋅ AB buffer) triggered a large decrease in colocalization with dissociation kinetics that was again too rapid to be resolved with flow-cell exchange. About 20% of the colocalized Cy3-actin was also refractory to dissociation (Fig. S3, B and C).

Video S3. TIRFM of GFP-βrat Association/Dissociation with G-Actin ((+/−) Calcium-Calmodulin), Related to Figs. 4 and 5
Download video file (2.7MB, mp4)

Conservation of network architecture and calmodulin sensitivity

We next investigated whether the design principle of a cross-linked network created from a multivalent attachment of single holoenzymes was preserved when linker length was varied. The formation of βHum (Fig. 6 A) and dC. elegans (Fig. 6 B) actin networks demonstrated this was the case and that, furthermore, the association of CaMKII with F-actin was conserved in invertebrate as well as invertebrates. The large variation in linker length between these species (25 dC. elegans and 200 βhum residues) allowed us to expand on the relationship between linker length and actin binding deduced from the rat isoforms (Introduction). Bundles and junctions should have dominated the βHum network if linker compliance facilitated multivalent association as proposed (14), but this expectation was not met. Quantitative comparison of the networks formed by the three CaMKII species showed that the mean number of filaments at single holoenzyme junctions was similar (2.65 (βRat), 2.5 (dC. elegans), and 2.79 (βHum)) (Fig. S4 A). There was an increase in the fraction of βHum network junctions with two or more holoenzymes (0.4 versus 0.1 (βRat,); 0.18 (dC. elegans)), possibly because the long, unstructured βHum linker may promote self-association. The dC. elegans and βhum networks had similar porosity to βRat at similar molar concentration. The dC. elegans network was less dense than the βRat one based on the junction density, but this may simply reflect grid-to-grid variation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Negative-stain EM images of actin networks. (A) βHum. Junctions with one (blue) or two (green), or holoenzymes are circled (holoenzyme/junction = 1.35 ± 0.6). The aggregate of multiple holoenzymes (purple) decorates a bundle. (B) dC. elegans-actin networks with junctions color coded as in (A). Scale bars, 0.1 μm. (C). Video frames with filaments are outlined by the GMimPro tracking algorithm for centroid computation. (i) Rh-Ph biotinylated F-actin gel with dC. elegans on streptavidin-coated glass after 30-min of incubation with dC. elegans (Q = 13,030 counts/pixel; R = 0.75) (ii) Disassembled filaments <3 min after subsequent flow-in of 0.1 mM calcium/1-μM calmodulin. (D) Mean-square deviation versus time interval (dT) plots for populations before (red symbols; Dlat = 0.06 μm2/s) and after (blue symbols; Dlat = 0.37 μm2/s) treatment with calcium-calmodulin.

Linker length could regulate calcium-calmodulin access as noted in Introduction. If so, networks formed by the short-linker dC. elegans should resist disassembly by calcium-calmodulin. We used epifluorescence LM to test whether this was the case. The dC. elegans molar concentration was increased threefold to form a network in which most cables were bundled. The network disassembled completely within 1 min when perfused with calcium-calmodulin as measured by increased thermal motions (Video S4). Filaments could be tracked for centroid computation in single video frames despite the background epifluorescence (Fig. 6 C). The mobility was documented by mean-square deviation versus dT plots before and after perfusion (Fig. 6 D) with the anisotropic diffusion of the disassembled filaments evident in the tracks.

Video S4. C. elegans CaMKII-Actin, Network ((+/−) Calcium-Calmodulin), Related to Fig. 6, C and D
Download video file (3.8MB, mp4)

In conclusion, the EM established that the nematode holoenzyme with short linkers forms networks almost as well as the longer linker vertebrate holoenzymes at physiological molar ratios based on the common design of multivalent junctions formed by one or two holoenzymes. The single-molecule TIRFM experiments demonstrated the activated CaMKII was released rapidly enough to phosphorylate targets relevant for cytoskeletal remodeling during early LTP. The LM tested that the short dC. elegans linker does not impede access of calcium-calmodulin on the minute timescale, importantly documenting CaMKII-actin network disassembly as an additional mechanistic feature during early LTP with consequences for cytoskeletal remodeling as explored below.

The bundling of actin filaments by crowding agents is blocked by CaMKII

The CaMKII-actin network disassembly triggered by calcium-calmodulin has physiological relevance only if the architecture of the assembled network is insensitive to perturbations experienced in live cells but malleable to such perturbations when disassembled. Motivated by this consideration, we examined the resilience of CaMKII-actin networks to molecular crowding and myosin motor activity in the absence and presence of calcium-calmodulin.

PEG, an inert globular solute whose effects on F-actin organization have been studied previously (33), was used to study crowding (Fig. 7 A). The SOAX snake intensity (Q) distribution mapped the increase in bundling with PEG concentration (Fig. 7 B). The volume fraction is related to the difference between the solution and solvent viscosity (45). The viscosity of 20% PEG solution was estimated to be 8.6 centipoise (Fig. S4 Bi), comparable to estimates for dendritic spine cytoplasm (46). The persistence length (lp) computed from snake curvature (K) increased (i.e., the filaments stiffened) from 4.5 μm (10% PEG) to 10 μm (20% PEG) with smaller increase at 30% PEG as the networks formed. The K distributions were fitted well by the worm-like chain model even though lp was systematically underestimated (Fig. S4 Bii). Filament aggregation showed a sharp increase between 15 and 20% PEG concentration (Fig. 7, A and B). However, CaMKII-actin networks formed with βHum (or βRat) in the absence of calcium-calmodulin, but in the presence or absence of 20% PEG, they did not aggregate (Fig. 7 C). 20% PEG caused F-actin alone and F-actin mixed with βHum and calcium-calmodulin to aggregate in ∼20 min as tracked by changes in Q and R. In contrast, 20% PEG mixed with F-actin and βHum in the absence of calcium-calmodulin showed a substantially smaller increase in Q and no significant change in R (Fig. 7 D).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

CaMKII counteracts macromolecular crowding. (A) Rh-Ph F-actin suspensions in AB/GOC with 0% PEG, 15% PEG (15 min), 20% PEG (30 min), and 30% PEG (30 min). (B) Cable intensity (Q) distributions as a function of PEG concentration show shifts in modal values as bundling increases (S = 0.17 (0% PEG); 0.39 (10%PEG); 0.62 (15% PEG); 0.72 (20% PEG)). The dashed line (red) is the Q value for the dC. elegans network (Fig. 6Ci). (C) Rh-Ph F-actin/βHum mixtures in 0% (R = 1.04; Q = 7810 counts/px (pixel)) and 20% PEG. Scale bars (A and D), 5 μm. (D) Time course of bundling/network formation (20% PEG buffer; F-actin without (open) and with βHum (solid)) tracked by the increase in Q and decrease in R. Lines show single-exponential best fits.

We conclude that aggregation occurs when the network is disassembled by calcium-calmodulin, but the kinetics is too slow (>20 min) to account for the compaction phase recorded during early LTP. Importantly, the CaMKII-actin networks are not deformed by osmolytes at solution viscosities compared to those obtained in live cells. The networks would therefore maintain spine morphology under basal conditions.

Remodeling by myosin motors requires network disassembly

Next, we tested the effect of the mechanical resilience conferred by CaMKII to forces exerted on actin networks by myosin filaments. Surface-tethered, three-dimensional CaMKII-actin networks were created by adding biotinylated F-actin (1:10 biotin/G-actin labeling ratio) to a neutravidin-coated coverslip followed by perfusion of different mixtures of nonbiotinylated Rh-Ph F-actin, myosin miniature filaments, and dC. elegans CaMKII in AB. After 30 min of incubation, unbound material was washed away with AB, and networks were viewed by epifluorescence microscopy. First, a control experiment, performed in absence of CaMKII, showed that ATP addition (AB+) triggered rapid compaction of the actin filaments as reported (36). Fluorescent F-actin foci coalesced (<3 min) and compacted until the force balance between myosin filaments at different foci caused them to become spaced and pulled the interconnecting F-actin cables taut. F-actin networks were then formed in the presence of CaMKII. Now, compaction was largely blocked over a 30-min period after the addition of ATP. Subsequent addition of calcium-calmodulin initiated rapid compaction that was >50% complete within 3 min (Fig. 8 A; Video S5). After 6 min, additional foci did not form, but the intensity of existing foci and the spacing between them increased. The R value increased linearly over a 12-min period (i.e., the foci spacing became more ordered with time), whereas the integrated foci intensity Qfocishowed a single exponential increase to a limiting value (Fig. 8 B). Coalescence dynamics of two adjacent foci with brief episodes of rapid translocation over a 75-s period (0.1 μm/s approach rate) are shown in an example kymograph (Fig. 8 C). The rate of coalescence was comparable to the reported control rate (36) indicating that any residual CaMKII-actin attachments do not impede the mechanics.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Long-range alignment by myosin motor myosin filaments. (A) Rh-Ph biotinylated F-actin tethered to streptavidin-coated glass coverslips incubated with myosin filaments. Compaction after perfusion of AB+/GOC (2 mM ATP) in the absence (i) and presence of (ii) dC. elegans. After perfusion of calcium buffer Ca-AB+/GOC with 1 μM calmodulin, the CaMKII cross-linked network changes to resemble the compacted control network. Scale bars (white), 5 μm. (B) Time course of network remodeling after calcium-calmodulin perfusion tracked as an increase in R (black) and Qfoci(foci; green) compared to the time for foci formation (R; white), Qfoci(orange) in the absence of CaMKII. Linear (dashed line) and exponential (continuous curve) best fits to R and Q, respectively, are shown. (C) A kymograph of the approach and coalescence trajectories of two foci (from a central section of the image field (Video S5; with calcium-calmodulin) along the yellow line.

Video S5. Myosin Mmini-Filament Powered Compaction ((+/−) CaMKII, (+/−) Calcium-Calmodulin), Related to Fig. 8, Ai and Aii
Download video file (3.4MB, mp4)

To mimic the action of myosin motors tethered at the PSD, we coated the microscope coverslip with a high-density surface layer of randomly oriented heavy meromyosin (HMM) using protocols from in vitro motility assays. Upon the addition of ATP, CaMKII cross-linked actin filaments remained immobilized, whereas free filaments glided closely juxtaposed to and aligned with the static filaments (47) without becoming fragmented as commonly happens in motility assays performed at high HMM surface densities (48) (Fig. S4 C; Video S6). At the same HMM surface density, F-actin networks were not created if calcium-calmodulin was present in the CaMKII/F-actin mixture, and the filaments fragmented upon addition of ATP as reported before (40).

Video S6. HMM Powered F-Actin Gliding along Filaments in an Immobilized CaMKII-Actin Calmodulin), Related to Fig. S4 Cii
Download video file (1.5MB, mp4)

Discussion

Four aspects of CaMKII-actin networks have been explored in our study: 1) the assembly and mechanics of F-actin cross-links formed by CaMKII; 2) the physical role of the CaMKII linker region in network connectivity; 3) the holoenzyme dissociation and network disassembly by calcium-calmodulin, modulated by ATP and tatCN21; and 4) the effect of molecular crowding agents and myosin motors on network architecture and resulting implications for the structural role of CaMKII during early LTP (Fig. 1). Taken together, the results show how CaMKII multivalent linkages form F-actin networks that are sufficiently robust to resist the forces produced by molecular crowding and myosin motors. This suggests that CaMKII-actin networks may maintain the resting morphology of dendritic spines with disruption by calcium-calmodulin, accounting for spine remodeling after synaptic stimulation. The weak monovalent affinity of CaMKII for G-actin allows rapid dissociation by calcium-calmodulin for CaMKII sequestration at the PSD and increase in the G-actin pool, leading to de novo filament formation.

Assembly and mechanics of cross-linked actin networks

Observed changes of the parameters Q and R described F-actin network architectures under both steady-state and dynamic experimental conditions. A random network with Poisson-distributed nearest-neighbor junction distances (∼1) was obtained at low CaMKII-actin molar ratios, implying little or no interaction between neighboring nodes. The network was stabilized by preferential localization of CaMKII to junctions. When the ratio of CaMKII to F-actin was increased, F-actin bundles were progressively formed, and network architecture transitioned to an aggregated type (R < 1). The molecular crowding agent, PEG, caused a similar transition by bundling F-actin.

EM images of βRat/F-actin documented that junctions are abundant at substoichiometric (0.3) ratios. Published electron micrographs of CaMKII-actin networks show images similar in appearance to ours at comparable molar ratios, whereas bundling dominates (>80%) at equimolar and higher ratios (7). The LM and EM make the case that filaments bundle by being stapled together at multiple points by the holoenzymes in stochastic fashion as concentration increases. The randomness parameter, R, introduced in this study provides a ground-level descriptor of model networks to frame theories regarding their assembly and mechanism. It would be of interest to relate this measure to higher-level descriptors of bundle mechanics and viscoelasticity (37, 49) in future work. Here, we found that CaMKII bundles and the bundles formed by crowding agents both have R values that decrease from 1 (random) as PEG or CaMKII concentration is increased, which is consistent with the fact that the bundles are aggregations formed by random, isotropic interactions. In contrast, ladder-like bundles periodically spaced by the bivalent actin cross-linker, α-actinin (50), form ordered lattice networks (51) that would be predicted to have high R values in our assays, as might be tested in the future.

A study (36) of streptavidin/F-actinbiotin cross-linked networks mixed with myosin filaments showed that upon ATP addition and myosin filament force production, streptavidin cross-links increased the coalescence of actomyosin foci (0.6 μm/s) from the rate in absence of streptavidin (0.1 μm/s) at low biotin levels (1/1000 biotin/actin molar ratio) but retarded (0.03 μm/s) at fivefold higher levels because of the tension of connecting filament cables opposing motor forces. Here, we found that coalescence of the foci was blocked in the presence of CaMKII. We conclude that under our experimental conditions, CaMKII-actin networks have sufficient mechanical resilience to resist the compaction forces exerted by myosin miniature filaments.

CaMKII-actin networks can complement studies of model systems such as streptavidin-biotin cross-linked actin networks in important ways by exploiting calcium-calmodulin as a tool to dial the affinity and number of cross-links formed. Although the affinity of a single biotin-streptavidin bond (52) is orders of magnitude greater than the βrat affinity for G-actin (13), the dodecameric nature of βrat compared to tetrameric streptavidin may lead to a smaller difference in binding avidity for F-actin. We note that steric constraints would likely limit the number of binding sites that could attach simultaneously to the same actin filament or to a closely approximated group of actin filaments.

The role of the linker domain in CaMKII-actin networks

The nematode dC. elegans, with a linker length comparable to the αRat and γRat linkers, forms networks at equivalent molar concentration, albeit with slightly lower junction density and filaments/junction. This result, together with published results for the rat isoforms (53), shows that much of the βRat linker is not essential for actin binding. The two conserved linker segments identified by the multiple sequence alignment (MSA), the α-helical core piece and the unstructured serine/threonine-rich sequence element, may together constitute an actin-binding surface, although the possibility that such a surface is outside the linker cannot be ruled out (15). The additional linker residues may modulate actin binding because the mutation of all autophosphorylation sites to aspartate (a phospho-threonine mimic) in the βRat linker and adjacent residues abolishes F-actin binding; however, mutation to the small amino acid alanine has a small effect (5). Nevertheless, the long-linker βHum, whose 220-residue linker is predicted to be largely (>90%) unstructured, forms networks that are indistinguishable from those formed by βRat at similar concentrations; thus, actin binding is not simply proportional to linker length. The persistence length of unstructured peptides is short (∼1 nm) (54), so even short-linker holoenzymes may flex to bind multiple F-actin subunits, with further increase in linker length being inconsequential.

Long linkers may alternatively function to regulate holoenzyme activation instead of facilitating CaMKII-actin network formation. Serine/threonine phosphorylation increases persistence length of unstructured peptides (55) and is a prominent strategy in signaling mediated by phosphorylation-regulated protein-protein interactions (56). Linker extensibility, consistent with an EM rapid-freeze replica (57) and cryotomogram (20) images of the αRat holoenzyme, has rationalized how engineered dC. elegans six-residue linker insertions or deletions alter the Hill coefficient for substrate phosphorylation (58, 59). Kinase cooperativity has been studied thus far with short (<40 residue) linkers. Investigation of the much longer βHum linker merits future study because it may tune βHum response to calcium stimuli for another purpose and in a different tissue (60).

Mechanism of calcium-calmodulin-triggered dissociation

The single-molecule evidence for direct GFP-βRat binding to G-actin and F-actin extends conclusions from less direct methods based on intact cell cytoskeletons (14, 17) or correlated fluorescence intensity fluctuations (13). The measured dwell times showed that associations-dissociations occur on the second timescale for most (>90%) of the population. GFP-βRat dissociation from G- to F-actin induced by calcium-calmodulin could not be resolved by flow-cell exchange consistent with the reduction of dwell times. The single-exponential fit for dwell-times obtained for GFP-βRat association with G-actin contrasts with the tailed dwell time distributions obtained for the F-actin networks. The long-lived GFP-βRat holoenzymes trapped at filament junctions or bundles probably account for this difference and may also limit the disassembly (∼1 min) of the in vitro dC. elegans actin network. The invertebrate dC. elegans-actin network and its calcium-calmodulin-triggered dissociation reported here for the first time, to our knowledge, suggest the utility of CaMKII-actin networks for cytoskeletal signal transduction applies beyond vertebrate cardiovascular and neuronal functions that have traditionally driven CaMKII research.

The rapid phase of GFP-βRat dissociation from F-actin was similar to its dissociation from G-actin, consistent with a common actin-binding interface for F- and G-actin. The unbinding rate, koff, that occurs after adding calcium-calmodulin is similar to that measured by TIRFM SPT in cultures of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (koff = 6.5 s−1) for the GFP-βrat T287D mutant that does not bind cytoskeletal actin (14). The refractory fraction resistant to calcium-calmodulin alone was dissociated when calcium-calmodulin was supplemented by tCN21. This result implies that the peptide tCN21 binds to individual subunits opened by calcium-calmodulin to shift the inactivatable holoenzyme forms toward extended, activatable states. In contrast, ATP did not reduce the refractory-bound fraction probably because the ATP binding site is not fully formed in the autoinhibited conformation. A similar rationale was used to explain why the autocamtide-2 inhibitor peptide, an autophosphorylation site mimic, did not affect dissociation (5).

The calcium-calmodulin responsive and refractory subpopulations documented in our single-molecule experiments matched the estimates for the extended versus compact autoinhibited holoenzyme conformations seen in cryoelectron tomograms (20). The match is consistent with binding of calcium-calmodulin to the extended conformation alone. The fact that calcium-calmodulin disassembles networks within 1 min indicates that the refractory populations either do not block network disassembly or transition over a minute to the extended, calcium-calmodulin responsive conformation. Thus, calmodulin access is not a concern for early LTP.

Implications for early LTP

Cytosolic calcium increases rapidly to millimolar levels after synaptic stimulation because of the inward NMDA calcium current to initiate the transition from state (i) to state (ii) (Fig. 1 C). Rapid (a few seconds) dissociation of CaMKII from both F-actin and G-actin, as reported here, has a twofold effect: polymerization of the released G-actin that can proceed immediately and slower disassembly of the CaMKII-actin network. The latter would coincide with the time course of myosin-II polymerization into miniature filaments that would be slow because phosphorylation must precede myosin filament assembly. Thus, our results are compatible with the scenario in which the rapid initial phase of spine expansion is due primarily to actin polymerization, whereas subsequent spine compaction occurs as polymerization slows and myosin motor activity increases. Although the calcium transient is short lived, the newly formed myosin miniature filaments as well as the PSD-sequestered, NMDA-bound CaMKII will continue to be active (61, 62).

The molar ratio of CaMKII/G-actin in the basal state of hippocampal neuron dendritic spines is around 0.3 (Fig. 1, state i). This estimate is based on the CaMKII concentration (138 μM) (8) and assumes actin is comparable to lamellipodia (500 μM as F-actin out of 650 μM total) (63). We find that <25% of F-actin is bundled at this molar ratio, but bundling occurs at higher molar ratios. The basal dendritic spine free-calcium level is subnanomolar, so calmodulin is in its apo form, and CaMKII-actin networks are stable and not susceptible to forces due to macromolecular crowding or episodic myosin motor activation triggered by miniature synaptic currents (64). It is not presently known whether myosin motors act as individual molecules tethered to the PSD or as a collective by assembling into miniature filaments. Our assays recreated both scenarios with myosin motors at higher concentrations than likely to obtain at the synapse. Myosin-II activity at the leading edge is thought to fragment actin networks for turning in neuronal growth cones (27). Neurons express the βE splice variant that lacks actin-binding functionality during early development (12); thus, immature spine filopodia may also utilize myosin-induced fragmentation unconstrained by CaMKII cross-links to orient to developmental cues. Fragmentation will, however, be deleterious for mature spines once synapses form, so CaMKII-actin networks may be important blockers of episodic myosin activity. The CaMKII-actin networks in our assays were resistant to both myosin-powered compaction and fragmentation.

The mechanical strength of the CaMKII-actin network is an advantage under basal conditions to counteract physical force but a disadvantage when the same forces are needed to remodel the spine. Thus, if CaMKII-actin networks maintain spine size under basal conditions, it follows that synaptic stimulation must couple CaMKII dissociation to network disassembly. The single-molecule TIRF experiments establish that the dominant actin-bound GFP-βrat fraction (∼80%) dissociates within seconds, which is consistent with this premise. The activated, dissociated holoenzymes will retain the extended conformation with rebinding of R1 to its parent subunit blocked by subunit capture and calmodulin trapped by T287 phosphorylation (65). The stable end state (Fig. 1 C, state iii) for spine volume is reached after 3 min. The myosin miniature-filament-powered compaction reported in this study is rapid enough to account for the compaction from the peak to the end-state volume of the stimulated spine. On the other hand, compaction due to clustering mediated by crowding agents may be ruled out because it is too slow. As the new basal state is established, the actin cytoskeleton will again be stabilized by CaMKII cross-linking.

Our data show that tCN21 facilitates dissociation from F-actin. It may do so by shifting the holoenzyme conformational equilibrium to the extended form upon binding subunits opened by calcium-calmodulin. Regardless of mechanism, this result implies that CaMKII associated with NMDA receptors is mechanically uncoupled from cytoskeletal actin. The uncoupling may prolong PSD-sequestered CaMKII activation to allow PSD remodeling to be completed. However, CaMKII interactions with other cytoskeletal proteins, notably α-actinin (66), might be as important, if not more so, to synchronize the changes in cytoskeletal and PSD architecture for increased synaptic strength.

A model (28) based on transcriptome analysis (67) and live-cell imaging of fluorophore-tagged proteins (kinases: RhoA, Cdc42; actin-binding proteins: cofilin/Arp2/3) (23, 68) simulated CaMKII-mediated phosphorylation cascades for actin polymerization and subsequent compaction by myosin motors. The model accounted for the observed changes in spine volume (Fig. 1 C) that were robust to rate and concentration variations as assessed by sensitivity analysis (69). The current study characterizes the important role of CaMKII in regulating cytoskeletal architecture. This idea was implicit in but not explicitly addressed by the model. Rapid disassembly of the actin cytoskeleton, in particular the CaMKII-actin networks described here, must be coupled to CaMKII dissociation by calcium-calmodulin to allow myosin-powered F-actin network compaction to proceed. Spine remodeling could be fine-tuned by fragmentation of the disassembled actin filaments by PSD-tethered myosin motors for polymerization at the spine tip. Thus, CaMKII could serve as a synaptic tag but in a profoundly different sense than proposed by Lisman (70) and others (71) in that it orchestrates stimulus-induced volume changes of the dendritic spine and more importantly maintains the volume difference between stimulated and nonstimulated spines over times long enough to initiate downstream processes for LTP.

In conclusion, this study provides a novel, to our knowledge, view of CaMKII-actin network architectural dynamics to better define the structural role of CaMKII that has been largely considered thus far in terms of its association with the PSD (70). The architecture is remarkable in that it seems to have evolved to both fix spine size over hours under basal conditions as well as disassemble in response to a calcium-calmodulin pulse, within a minute, to complement its kinase activity during early LTP. Measurements of the calcium-calmodulin-triggered network disassembly and its modulation by ATP and membrane receptor targets have mechanistic implications that may be tested and refined by numerical simulations and in vivo experiments.

Author Contributions

S.K. designed/performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. K.H.D. designed/participated in EM experiments and edited the manuscript. J.E.M. designed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Margaret Stratton for the bacterial CaMKII expression plasmids and advice on CaMKII purification protocols, Dr. Simone Kunzelmann for antibody characterization, and Ms. Hina Iftikhar for assistance with bioinformatic analysis.

This study was supported by the Royal Society Collaborative Exchange (grant U1175), the Molecular Biology Consortium (S.K.), and the Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding FC001119 from Cancer Research United Kingdom, the United Kingdom Medical Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust (J.E.M.). EM was performed with equipment supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM51487.

Editor: Laurent Blanchoin.

Footnotes

Supporting Materials and Methods, four figures, and six videos are available at http://www.biophysj.org/biophysj/supplemental/S0006-3495(18)31227-X.

Supporting Citations

References (72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83) appear in the Supporting Material

Supporting Material

Document S1. Supporting Materials and Methods and Figs. S1–S4
mmc1.pdf (819.2KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supporting Material
mmc9.pdf (5.2MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Lisman J., Yasuda R., Raghavachari S. Mechanisms of CaMKII action in long-term potentiation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012;13:169–182. doi: 10.1038/nrn3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lisman J., Malenka R.C., Malinow R. Learning mechanisms: the case for CaM-KII. Science. 1997;276:2001–2002. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rongo C., Kaplan J.M. CaMKII regulates the density of central glutamatergic synapses in vivo. Nature. 1999;402:195–199. doi: 10.1038/46065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Herring B.E., Nicoll R.A. Long-term potentiation: from CaMKII to AMPA receptor trafficking. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2016;78:351–365. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim K., Lakhanpal G., Okamoto K. A temporary gating of actin remodeling during synaptic plasticity consists of the interplay between the kinase and structural functions of CaMKII. Neuron. 2015;87:813–826. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shen K., Teruel M.N., Meyer T. CaMKIIbeta functions as an F-actin targeting module that localizes CaMKIIalpha/beta heterooligomers to dendritic spines. Neuron. 1998;21:593–606. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80569-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Okamoto K., Narayanan R., Hayashi Y. The role of CaMKII as an F-actin-bundling protein crucial for maintenance of dendritic spine structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:6418–6423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701656104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Otmakhov N., Lisman J. Measuring CaMKII concentration in dendritic spines. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2012;203:106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hell J.W. CaMKII: claiming center stage in postsynaptic function and organization. Neuron. 2014;81:249–265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nicoll R.A. A brief history of long-term potentiation. Neuron. 2017;93:281–290. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brocke L., Srinivasan M., Schulman H. Developmental and regional expression of multifunctional Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase isoforms in rat brain. J. Neurosci. 1995;15:6797–6808. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06797.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.O’Leary H., Lasda E., Bayer K.U. CaMKIIbeta association with the actin cytoskeleton is regulated by alternative splicing. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2006;17:4656–4665. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-03-0252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sanabria H., Swulius M.T., Waxham M.N. betaCaMKII regulates actin assembly and structure. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:9770–9780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M809518200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khan S., Conte I., Molloy J.E. Multiple CaMKII binding modes to the actin cytoskeleton revealed by single-molecule imaging. Biophys. J. 2016;111:395–408. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hoffman L., Farley M.M., Waxham M.N. Calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II isoforms differentially impact the dynamics and structure of the actin cytoskeleton. Biochemistry. 2013;52:1198–1207. doi: 10.1021/bi3016586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huse M., Kuriyan J. The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell. 2002;109:275–282. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00741-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shen K., Meyer T. Dynamic control of CaMKII translocation and localization in hippocampal neurons by NMDA receptor stimulation. Science. 1999;284:162–166. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chao L.H., Pellicena P., Kuriyan J. Intersubunit capture of regulatory segments is a component of cooperative CaMKII activation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17:264–272. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rellos P., Pike A.C., Knapp S. Structure of the CaMKIIdelta/calmodulin complex reveals the molecular mechanism of CaMKII kinase activation. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Myers J.B., Zaegel V., Reichow S.L. The CaMKII holoenzyme structure in activation-competent conformations. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15742. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bhattacharyya M., Stratton M.M., Kuriyan J. Molecular mechanism of activation-triggered subunit exchange in Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. eLife. 2016;5:e13405. doi: 10.7554/eLife.13405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yasuda R., Nimchinsky E.A., Svoboda K. Imaging calcium concentration dynamics in small neuronal compartments. Sci. STKE. 2004;2004:pl5. doi: 10.1126/stke.2192004pl5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bosch M., Castro J., Hayashi Y. Structural and molecular remodeling of dendritic spine substructures during long-term potentiation. Neuron. 2014;82:444–459. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martin K.C., Kosik K.S. Synaptic tagging -- who’s it? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002;3:813–820. doi: 10.1038/nrn942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lu H.E., MacGillavry H.D., Blanpied T.A. Multiple spatial and kinetic subpopulations of CaMKII in spines and dendrites as resolved by single-molecule tracking PALM. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:7600–7610. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4364-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Honkura N., Matsuzaki M., Kasai H. The subspine organization of actin fibers regulates the structure and plasticity of dendritic spines. Neuron. 2008;57:719–729. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Medeiros N.A., Burnette D.T., Forscher P. Myosin II functions in actin-bundle turnover in neuronal growth cones. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006;8:215–226. doi: 10.1038/ncb1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rangamani P., Levy M.G., Oster G. Paradoxical signaling regulates structural plasticity in dendritic spines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E5298–E5307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610391113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim J.H., Liao D., Huganir R.L. SynGAP: a synaptic RasGAP that associates with the PSD-95/SAP90 protein family. Neuron. 1998;20:683–691. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rubio M.D., Johnson R., Rumbaugh G. Regulation of synapse structure and function by distinct myosin II motors. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:1448–1460. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3294-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hodges J.L., Newell-Litwa K., Horwitz A.R. Myosin IIb activity and phosphorylation status determines dendritic spine and post-synaptic density morphology. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rex C.S., Gavin C.F., Rumbaugh G. Myosin IIb regulates actin dynamics during synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Neuron. 2010;67:603–617. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tharmann R., Claessens M.M., Bausch A.R. Micro- and macrorheological properties of actin networks effectively cross-linked by depletion forces. Biophys. J. 2006;90:2622–2627. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.070458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vogel S.K., Petrasek Z., Schwille P. Myosin motors fragment and compact membrane-bound actin filaments. eLife. 2013;2:e00116. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schmoller K.M., Lieleg O., Bausch A.R. Structural and viscoelastic properties of actin/filamin networks: cross-linked versus bundled networks. Biophys. J. 2009;97:83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Soares e Silva M., Depken M., Koenderink G.H. Active multistage coarsening of actin networks driven by myosin motors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:9408–9413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016616108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rückerl F., Lenz M., Sykes C. Adaptive response of actin bundles under mechanical stress. Biophys. J. 2017;113:1072–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Coultrap S.J., Bayer K.U. Improving a natural CaMKII inhibitor by random and rational design. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jones D.T., Cozzetto D. DISOPRED3: precise disordered region predictions with annotated protein-binding activity. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:857–863. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Butt T., Mufti T., Molloy J.E. Myosin motors drive long range alignment of actin filaments. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:4964–4974. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.044792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mashanov G.I., Molloy J.E. Automatic detection of single fluorophores in live cells. Biophys. J. 2007;92:2199–2211. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.081117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xu T., Vavylonis D., Huang X. SOAX: a software for quantification of 3D biopolymer networks. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:9081. doi: 10.1038/srep09081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Smith M.B., Li H., Vavylonis D. Segmentation and tracking of cytoskeletal filaments using open active contours. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2010;67:693–705. doi: 10.1002/cm.20481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Clark P.J., Evans F.C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measurment of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology. 1954;35:445–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bullard J.W., Pauli A.T., Martys N.S. A comparison of viscosity-concentration relationships for emulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;330:186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.10.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Khan S., Zou Y., Reese T.S. Sequestration of CaMKII in dendritic spines in silico. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2011;31:581–594. doi: 10.1007/s10827-011-0323-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Khan S.M., Ali R., Molloy J.E. Active actin gels. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2012;5:39–42. doi: 10.4161/cib.18286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hussain S., Molloy J.E., Khan S.M. Spatiotemporal dynamics of actomyosin networks. Biophys. J. 2013;105:1456–1465. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Weirich K.L., Banerjee S., Gardel M.L. Liquid behavior of cross-linked actin bundles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:2131–2136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616133114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wachsstock D.H., Schwartz W.H., Pollard T.D. Affinity of alpha-actinin for actin determines the structure and mechanical properties of actin filament gels. Biophys. J. 1993;65:205–214. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81059-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pelletier O., Pokidysheva E., Safinya C.R. Structure of actin cross-linked with alpha-actinin: a network of bundles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003;91:148102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.148102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sano T., Cantor C.R. Cooperative biotin binding by streptavidin. Electrophoretic behavior and subunit association of streptavidin in the presence of 6 M urea. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:3369–3373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hoffman L., Stein R.A., Mchaourab H.S. Conformational changes underlying calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II activation. EMBO J. 2011;30:1251–1262. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cheng S., Cetinkaya M., Gräter F. How sequence determines elasticity of disordered proteins. Biophys. J. 2010;99:3863–3869. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chin A.F., Toptygin D., Hilser V.J. Phosphorylation increases persistence length and end-to-end distance of a segment of tau protein. Biophys. J. 2016;110:362–371. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dunker A.K., Uversky V.N. Signal transduction via unstructured protein conduits. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008;4:229–230. doi: 10.1038/nchembio0408-229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dosemeci A., Reese T.S., Beushausen S. Localization of the linker domain of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;263:657–662. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chao L.H., Stratton M.M., Kuriyan J. A mechanism for tunable autoinhibition in the structure of a human Ca2+/calmodulin- dependent kinase II holoenzyme. Cell. 2011;146:732–745. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rosenberg O.S., Deindl S., Kuriyan J. Structure of the autoinhibited kinase domain of CaMKII and SAXS analysis of the holoenzyme. Cell. 2005;123:849–860. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.De Koninck P., Schulman H. Sensitivity of CaM kinase II to the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations. Science. 1998;279:227–230. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5348.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bayer K.U., De Koninck P., Schulman H. Interaction with the NMDA receptor locks CaMKII in an active conformation. Nature. 2001;411:801–805. doi: 10.1038/35081080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Otmakhov N., Tao-Cheng J.H., Lisman J. Persistent accumulation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in dendritic spines after induction of NMDA receptor-dependent chemical long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:9324–9331. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2350-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Koestler S.A., Rottner K., Small J.V. F- and G-actin concentrations in lamellipodia of moving cells. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Manabe T., Renner P., Nicoll R.A. Postsynaptic contribution to long-term potentiation revealed by the analysis of miniature synaptic currents. Nature. 1992;355:50–55. doi: 10.1038/355050a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Meyer T., Hanson P.I., Schulman H. Calmodulin trapping by calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. Science. 1992;256:1199–1202. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5060.1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Matt L., Kim K., Hell J.W. α-actinin anchors PSD-95 at postsynaptic sites. Neuron. 2018;97:1094–1109.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Proskura A.L., Ratushnyak A.S., Zapara T.A. The protein-protein interaction networks of dendritic spines in the early phase of long-term potentiation. J. Comput. Sci. Syst. Biol. 2014;7:40–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Murakoshi H., Yasuda R. Postsynaptic signaling during plasticity of dendritic spines. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Varma A., Morbidelli M., Wu H. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2005. Parametric Sensitivity in Chemical Systems. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sanhueza M., Lisman J. The CaMKII/NMDAR complex as a molecular memory. Mol. Brain. 2013;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-6-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rogerson T., Cai D.J., Silva A.J. Synaptic tagging during memory allocation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014;15:157–169. doi: 10.1038/nrn3667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.The UniProt Consortium UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D158–D169. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Fu L., Niu B., Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Waterhouse A.M., Procter J.B., Barton G.J. Jalview version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–1191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Price M.N., Dehal P.S., Arkin A.P. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Burley S.K., Berman H.M., Zardecki C. RCSB protein data bank: sustaining a living digital data resource that enables breakthroughs in scientific research and biomedical education. Protein Sci. 2018;27:316–330. doi: 10.1002/pro.3331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Buchan D.W., Minneci F., Jones D.T. Scalable web services for the PSIPRED protein analysis workbench. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W349–W357. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Stratton M., Lee I.H., Kuriyan J. Activation-triggered subunit exchange between CaMKII holoenzymes facilitates the spread of kinase activity. eLife. 2014;3:e01610. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hayashi N., Matsubara M., Taniguchi H. An expression system of rat calmodulin using T7 phage promoter in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr. Purif. 1998;12:25–28. doi: 10.1006/prep.1997.0807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Thoresen T., Lenz M., Gardel M.L. Thick filament length and isoform composition determine self-organized contractile units in actomyosin bundles. Biophys. J. 2013;104:655–665. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Isambert H., Venier P., Carlier M.F. Flexibility of actin filaments derived from thermal fluctuations. Effect of bound nucleotide, phalloidin, and muscle regulatory proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:11437–11444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.19.11437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Swaminathan R., Hoang C.P., Verkman A.S. Photobleaching recovery and anisotropy decay of green fluorescent protein GFP-S65T in solution and cells: cytoplasmic viscosity probed by green fluorescent protein translational and rotational diffusion. Biophys. J. 1997;72:1900–1907. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78835-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure360: An Author Presentation of Fig. 1
Download video file (88.7MB, mp4)
Video S1. SOAX Representation of an F-Actin Network, Related to Fig. 2 A
Download video file (817.5KB, mp4)
Video S2. TIRFM of GFP-βrat Association/Dissociation with F-Actin ((+/−) Calcium-Calmodulin), Related to Fig. 4 Aii and Fig. 5 Aii
Download video file (5.1MB, mp4)
Video S3. TIRFM of GFP-βrat Association/Dissociation with G-Actin ((+/−) Calcium-Calmodulin), Related to Figs. 4 and 5
Download video file (2.7MB, mp4)
Video S4. C. elegans CaMKII-Actin, Network ((+/−) Calcium-Calmodulin), Related to Fig. 6, C and D
Download video file (3.8MB, mp4)
Video S5. Myosin Mmini-Filament Powered Compaction ((+/−) CaMKII, (+/−) Calcium-Calmodulin), Related to Fig. 8, Ai and Aii
Download video file (3.4MB, mp4)
Video S6. HMM Powered F-Actin Gliding along Filaments in an Immobilized CaMKII-Actin Calmodulin), Related to Fig. S4 Cii
Download video file (1.5MB, mp4)
Document S1. Supporting Materials and Methods and Figs. S1–S4
mmc1.pdf (819.2KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supporting Material
mmc9.pdf (5.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES