Abstract
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an attractive therapeutic target for managing metabolic diseases. A class of pharmacological activators, including Merck 991, binds the AMPK ADaM site, which forms the interaction surface between the kinase domain (KD) of the α-subunit and the carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) of the β-subunit. Here, we report the development of two new 991-derivative compounds, R734 and R739, which potently activate AMPK in a variety of cell types, including β2-specific skeletal muscle cells. Surprisingly, we found that they have only minor effects on direct kinase activity of the recombinant α1β2γ1 isoform yet robustly enhance protection against activation loop dephosphorylation. This mode of activation is reminiscent of that of ADP, which activates AMPK by binding to the nucleotide-binding sites in the γ-subunit, more than 60 Å away from the ADaM site. To understand the mechanisms of full and partial AMPK activation, we determined the crystal structures of fully active phosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1 bound to AMP and R734/R739 as well as partially active nonphosphorylated AMPK bound to R734 and AMP and phosphorylated AMPK bound to R734 in the absence of added nucleotides at <3-Å resolution. These structures and associated analyses identified a novel conformational state of the AMPK autoinhibitory domain associated with partial kinase activity and provide new insights into phosphorylation-dependent activation loop stabilization in AMPK.
Keywords: AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), AMP, hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry, X-ray crystallography, phosphorylation, activation loop phosphorylation, ADaM site, CBS3, R734, R739, metabolic disorder, energy sensor
Introduction
AMPK2 is a three-subunit protein kinase that consists of two alternative kinase domain–containing α-subunits (α1 and α2), two alternative carbohydrate-binding module–containing β-subunits (β1 and β2), and three alternative AMP/ADP/ATP-binding γ-subunits (γ1, γ2, and γ3) (1–3). In humans, the β1 isoform is only present in a fraction of AMPK complexes in liver but not immunologically detectable in skeletal muscle, whose predominant isoform is α2β2γ1 (4–6). AMPK senses the energy state of cells by competitive binding of AMP, ADP, and ATP to three separate sites in its γ-subunit. Upon energy stress, i.e. increases in the ratio of AMP and ADP to ATP, AMPK is activated ∼100-fold by activation loop phosphorylation and an additional 2–10-fold by direct allosteric kinase activation (7). The activated enzyme phosphorylates key metabolic and regulatory proteins to stimulate ATP-generating catabolic pathways and inhibit ATP-consuming anabolic pathways and cellular programs (8–10). AMPK is an attractive potential target for the treatment of metabolic diseases, most prominently type 2 diabetes (9, 11, 12). Currently, metformin is the frontline drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Metformin is taken up predominantly by the liver where it generates AMPK-activating energy stress by mildly inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation. In addition, it has been reported that at low pharmacological levels AMPK increases phosphorylation through LKB1 by inducing AMPK heterotrimer formation (13) and formation of an LKB1–AMPK complex at the lysosomal membrane (14) without changing the AMP:ATP ratio (15, 16). Together, metformin potently activates AMPK, which mediates a subset of its effects (17, 18). In addition, acute activation of AMPK in skeletal muscle, which in humans is β2-isoform–specific, is mediated by exercise, but not by metformin, and induces robust and acute glucose uptake in rodents and primates, indicating that AMPK activation in muscle has important additional benefits (5, 19, 20).
Although indirect AMPK activators, like metformin or AMP analogs like ZMP (the intracellular phosphorylation product of AICAR), activate both β1- and β2-containing AMPK isoforms, they are not specific for AMPK. In contrast, ADaM site–binding pharmacological AMPK activators such as A769662 and especially 991 are specific but do not (A769662) (21) or relatively weakly (991) (22, 23) activate β2-containing complexes. Recently, both Merck (MK-9722) and Pfizer (PF-739) developed 991-derivative pan-AMPK activators (i.e. activators with reduced β1 specificity), and both compounds efficiently reduced blood glucose levels by insulin-independently stimulating muscle to take up glucose (5, 19). Another AMPK activator, SC4, efficiently activates β2 complexes that also contain the α2-subunit but only poorly activates complexes that contain the α1-subunit (24).
The ADaM site is located at the interface between the kinase domain of the α-subunit and the carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) of the β-subunit. Phosphorylation (or a phosphomimetic mutation) of CBM Ser-108 is either required or greatly increases binding of ADaM site ligands (22, 25). ADaM site binders stabilize the interface, which in turn conformationally stabilizes the highly dynamic CBM and shifts the equilibrium toward the active conformation of the kinase domain (22). Consequently, ADaM site activators, activation loop phosphorylation, and AMP-mediated direct allosteric AMPK activation can all collaborate, and ADaM site activators and AMP can partially (26) and possibly fully (25) activate AMPK in the absence of activation loop phosphorylation. To explore the mechanisms of full and partial AMPK activation, we have solved high-resolution crystal structures of phosphorylated α1β1γ1 AMPK bound to AMP and the two new AMPK ADaM site binders R734 and R739, phosphorylated α1β1γ1 AMPK bound to R734 in the absence of AMP, and nonphosphorylated α1β1γ1 AMPK with a CBM phosphomimetic mutant (CBM S108D) bound to AMP and R734, which have provided unanticipated insight into the conformational flexibility of AMPK.
Results
991-derivative compounds activate AMPK in cells
An important component of the KD–CBM interaction and its stabilization by ADaM site ligands is AMPK phosphorylation at Ser-108 in the CBM, which mediates interaction with two lysines (Lys-29 and Lys-31) in the KD (22, 27, 28). These interactions are stabilized by ADaM site compounds 991 and A769662, which form charge interactions with Lys-29 in β1-containing complexes (22, 27). We generated two derivatives of 991 in which we replaced the Lys-29–binding, negatively charged carboxyl group of the 991 o-methylbenzoic acid moiety against uncharged N-hydroxylamide (R734) and the 1-methylindole heterocyclic ring against 2-methylbiphenyl (R739) (Fig. 1). These compounds activated endogenous AMPK in all cell lines tested, including β2-specific LHCN-M2 human skeletal muscle cells, with low μm AC2X values (the concentration that increases activity 2-fold; Fig. 2, A and B). Both compounds also efficiently inhibited proliferation of A549 and H1299 human lung cancer cell lines (Fig. 2A). The ability of these compounds to activate AMPK in human skeletal muscle cells, which do not contain detectable amounts of AMPK β1 complexes (5), suggests that these compounds can activate both β1- and β2-containing AMPK complexes in cells.
Figure 1.
Chemical structures of R734, R739, and Merck 991.
Figure 2.
AMPK activation in cells. A, summary of AMPK activity data. Activation was determined by ELISA-based pACC assay. AC2X, compound concentration at which activity is 2-fold above background. 991, PF249, and GSK621 activation data were included as references. nd, not determined. B, R734 and R739 dose-response curves in pACC cell-based ELISAs. n = 2; error bars, S.D.
R734 and R739 separate isotype-selectively direct kinase activation from protection against activation loop dephosphorylation
Next, we analyzed the effects of R734 and R739 (Fig. 3A) and 991 (Fig. S1) on the direct kinase activity of bacterially produced, phosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1 and α1β2γ1. Both compounds consistently activated AMPK α1β1γ1 with similar EC50 values (265 and 257 nm, respectively), although -fold activation was at least twice as high for R734 than R739 (Fig. 3A). In contrast, activation of AMPK α1β2γ1 was weak and varied depending on ligand, substrate, protein preparation, and construct variations, resulting from mild activation to mild inhibition.
Figure 3.
Activation of purified, recombinant AMPK. A, activity dose-response curves determined by radioactive kinase assays using the ACC-based SAMS peptide as substrate. n = 3; error bars, S.D. B, effects of 20 μm R734, R739, or A769662 or 200 μm AMP on protection against activation loop dephosphorylation. The indicated AMPK proteins were incubated with protein phosphatase 2Cα (PP2C; left blot) or with λ-phosphatase (λ-pp; right blot) for the indicated length of time. Protein phosphatase 2Cα was chosen for AMPK α1β2γ1 as the activation loop phosphate of this isoform was inefficiently removed by λ-phosphatase. Phospho-AMPK was visualized by immunoblotting. ΔST, deletion of the ST loop in the α-subunit (amino acids 476–529).
In contrast to their variable effects on the direct kinase activity of AMPK α1β2γ1, both compounds robustly increased protection against activation loop dephosphorylation of both AMPK α1β1γ1 and α1β2γ1 (Fig. 3B). As a control, both compounds did not inhibit phosphatase activity (Fig. S2). Therefore, R739 and, to a lesser degree, R734 can functionally separate two mechanisms of AMPK activation (direct kinase activation and protection against activation loop dephosphorylation) selectively for the α1β2γ1 isoform. Therefore, AMPK α1β2γ1 activation by R739 in cells may occur predominantly or exclusively by increasing net activation loop phosphorylation.
R734 and R739 strongly increase net AMPK activation loop phosphorylation in cells
To understand how R734 and R739 affect activation loop phosphorylation and downstream signaling in cells, we tested their effects on AMPK activation loop phosphorylation and phosphorylation of the AMPK targets Raptor and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) in parallel with 991 and A769662. We incubated HepG2 cells with increasing doses of the four compounds, lysed cells, and analyzed lysates by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 4, the increase in phosphorylation of Raptor and ACC in the presence of R734 and R739 was similar to that of 991 and stronger than that of A769662 (note that A769662 does not activate AMPK α1β2γ1, which is the main AMPK isoform in HepG2 cells). In contrast, AMPK α1/α2 Thr-174/Thr-172 phosphorylation was clearly stronger in the presence of R734 and R739 than in the presence of 991 and A769662. The level of AMPK activity, measured by downstream target phosphorylation, depends on the combination of activation loop phosphorylation and direct, allosteric activation. The observation that R739 and 991 induce similar levels of Raptor and ACC phosphorylation but different levels of AMPK activation loop phosphorylation is therefore consistent with the inability of R739 to directly activate AMPK α1β2γ1.
Figure 4.
R734, R739, 991, and A769662 increase phosphorylation of AMPK, Raptor, and ACC in cells. A–D, dose-dependent phosphorylation increases in the presence of R734 (A), R739 (B), 991 (C), and A769662 (D). HepG2 cells were treated with increasing doses of R734, R739, 991, and A769662 for 1 h. Phosphorylated and total proteins were visualized by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Target bands are indicated by arrows. Higher order phosphorylation of AMPKα due to autophosphorylation is marked by asterisks. Bands above the phosphorylated Raptor bands are cross-reacting bands. β-Actin is shown as loading control.
Crystal structure determination of phosphorylated AMPK in complex with AMP and R734 or R739
To gain insight into the structural basis of full and partial AMPK activation by R734 and R739, we first cocrystallized both compounds with fully active phosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1, the kinase domain–stabilizing ATP-competitive kinase inhibitor staurosporine, and AMP (Fig. S3). This allowed us to determine their structures at 2.9- and 2.7-Å resolution, respectively (Fig. 5, A and B; structure statistics in Table 1). As expected, both structures show the hallmarks of fully active AMPK, including a fully aligned regulatory spine and fully resolved activation loop (Fig. S4A), as well as formation of a helix in the CBM linker (C-interacting helix; Fig. 5, A and B) that packs against and stabilizes the regulatory αC helix of the kinase domain, a hallmark for AMPK activated by ADaM site agonists (22, 27). Both structures are highly similar to each other (r.m.s.d. value of 0.47 Å over 845 residues) as well as to AMPK α2β1γ1 bound to the parent compound 991 (r.m.s.d. values of 1.66 Å over 806 residues (R734) and 1.69 Å over 818 residues (R739)).
Figure 5.
Structures of phosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1 in complex with R734/R739, AMP, and staurosporine. A and B, structure overviews. C–E, Close-ups of R734 (C)-, R739 (D)-, and 991-occupied (E) ADaM sites. Dashed lines, polar interactions. The CBM is colored cyan, the KD is green, and the ATP-binding G-loop of the KD is dark green.
Table 1.
Structure statistics
pAMPK–AMP–R734–staurosporinea | pAMPK–AMP–R739–staurosporinea | AMPK–AMP–R734–staurosporinea | pAMPK–R734–staurosporinea | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PDB codes | 6C9F | 6C9G | 6C9H | 6C9J |
Crystal parameters | ||||
Space group | P6122 | P6122 | P6122 | P6122 |
Resolution range (Å) | 50–2.92 (3.06–2.92)b | 50–2.70 (2.78–2.70)b | 2.65 (2.73–2.65)b | 50–3.05 (3.22–3.05)b |
Cell parameters: a, b, c; α, β, γ (Å; °) | 123.3, 123.3, 406.6; 90, 90, 120 | 123.0, 123.0, 406.0; 90, 90, 120 | 124.0, 124.0, 404.2; 90, 90, 120 | 124.5, 124.5, 406.5; 90, 90, 120 |
Total/unique reflections | 1,566,708/40,753 | 1,958,664/51,131 | 1,838,246/54,649 | 1,128,457/32,841 |
Completeness (%) | 99.9 (100) | 100 (100) | 100 (100) | 91.1 (58.1) |
Mean I/σ | 14.5 (2.4) | 18.7 (3.2) | 12.1 (2.1) | 10.0 (2.1) |
Multiplicity | 8.8 (9.3) | 28.3 (40.8) | 33.6 (35.4) | 34.4 (24.9) |
Rmerge | 0.110 (0.842) | 0.181 (2.38) | 0.57 (7.26) | 0.811 (9.29) |
CC1/2 | 0.999 (0.87) | 0.999 (0.839) | 0.997 (0.720) | 0.997 (0.722) |
Refinement | ||||
Resolution (Å) | 50–2.92 (3.03–2.92) | 2.70 (2.79–2.70) | 50–2.65 (2.75–2.65) | 50–3.05 (3.16–3.05) |
No. reflections | 40,620 (2,918) | 51,005 (3,622) | 50,806 (3,678) | 32,702 (2,366) |
No. residues | 854 | 868 | 902 | 863 |
No. solvent molecules | 0 | 52 | 80 | 0 |
No. non-H atoms | 6,991 | 7,170 | 7,501 | 7,034 |
Rcryst (%) | 22.8 (32.6) | 20.2 (28.8) | 21.3 (28.6) | 21.4 (36.4) |
Rfree (%) | 24.5 (34.1) | 24.0 (29.9) | 24.2 (33.0) | 22.4 (38.9) |
r.m.s.d. bonds (Å) | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.004 |
r.m.s.d. angles (°) | 0.719 | 0.954 | 0.758 | 0.782 |
Wilson B factor (Å2) | 54.9 | 46.2 | 54.1 | 71.4 |
B factor of protein (Å2) | 70.8 | 89.9 | 77.0 | 99.9 |
B factor of ligand (Å2) | 31.9 | 55.5 | 35.2 | 56.3 |
Ramachandran favored/outlier (%) | 98.32/0.00 | 98.7/0.0 | 98.2/0.0 | 98.2/0.0 |
MolProbity score | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.38 | 1.31 |
a Phosphorylated (p) or non-phosphorylated human AMPK His6-α1(13–550)-β1(76–272)-γ1(24–327) with deletion of the ST loop in the α-subunit (amino acids 476–529) and S108D mutation in the β-subunit.
b Values in parentheses are for the highest-resolution shell.
Although R734 and R739 lacked the 991 carboxyl group that forms an ionic interaction with Lys-29 in the KD, they unexpectedly made more extensive polar interactions with KD and CBM than 991 (R734: KD, Gly-28, Asn-48, and Asp-88; CBM, Arg-83; R739: KD, Gly-19, Gly-28, Lys-31, Asn-48, and Asp-88; CBM, Arg-83; 991: KD, Lys-29 and Asp-88) (Fig. 5, C–E). These additional interactions might further stabilize the CBM/KD interface and kinase domain active conformation.
R734 weakly synergizes with AMP for AMPK activation
Nonphosphorylated AMPK has at least 100-fold lower catalytic activity than AMPK in which activation loop Thr-174 (human AMPK α1; Thr-172 in human α2 and rat α1 and α2) is phosphorylated. Surprisingly, Scott et al. (25) demonstrated that AMPK α1β1γ1, which lacks activation loop phosphorylation but retains phosphorylation of Ser-108 in the CBM, can be fully activated by a combination of A769662 and AMP, implying that the AMPK kinase domain can adopt a fully active conformation in the absence of activation loop phosphorylation. 991 can also synergize with AMP to activate nonphosphorylated AMPK but only to about 10% of the activity of phosphorylated AMPK (26). In our hands, Escherichia coli–produced, nonphosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1 carrying a CBM S108D mutation, which partially mimics the effect of Ser-108 phosphorylation (25), was activated ∼20-fold by A769662, ∼3-fold by AMP, and ∼33-fold by the combination of A769662 and AMP (Fig. 6A). R734 activated the same protein ∼5.5-fold and in combination with AMP ∼10-fold (Fig. 6A), suggesting a marginal synergism that is insufficient to fully compensate for activation loop phosphorylation.
Figure 6.
Structure of nonphosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1–R734–AMP–staurosporine. A, R734 weakly synergizes with AMP for AMPK activation. Kinase assays were performed with recombinant, E. coli–expressed AMPK. The kinase assay with phosphorylated AMPK was performed on ice to compensate for the much higher activity compared with nonphosphorylated AMPK. n = 3; error bars, S.D. B, structure overview.
Crystal structure determination of nonphosphorylated AMPK in complex with AMP and R734
Because the requirement of activation loop phosphorylation for full AMPK activity can be partially overcome by a combination of R734 and AMP (Fig. 6A), we wanted to explore the structure of nonphosphorylated AMPK α1β1(S108D)γ1 in the presence of R734, staurosporine, and AMP. The phosphorylation-mimicking CBM S108D mutation allowed stabilization of the interaction with R734 in the absence of AMPK phosphorylation. The purified protein readily crystallized (Fig. S3) and allowed us to determine its structure at 2.65-Å resolution (Fig. 6B). Although the overall complex structure was well-defined by strong electron density, the regions of the AID and the following αRIM domains, particularly the residues from Lys-296 through Glu-338, show relatively weak density and high B factors. To correctly build this region of the structure, we calculated a 2Fo − Fc composite omit map with 3000 K simulated annealing to reduce model bias (Fig. 7, A and B, and Fig. S5, A–C). We surprisingly found that the AID conformation is largely different from those resolved in previously published AMPK structures (22, 24, 28) (Fig. 7C and Fig. S5, D–H). Although the overall omit map density is relatively weak, we observed reliable main chain density of the AID α1 helix from Met-289 through Leu-295, of the α2 helix from Leu-313 through Asn-317, and of the α3 helix from Tyr-326 through Met-335. Many large side chains also showed confident density in the composite omit map contoured at 0.7 to 1 σ. Examples are Met-289, Ile-290, and Glu-297 of α1; Asn-315 and Arg-316 of α2; and Tyr-326, His-327, Ile-329, Ile-330, and Arg-333 of α3. Further support for model building of the AID came from electrostatic interactions between AID residues and surrounding residues with clear density, such as Arg-316 of α2 that electrostatically interacts with Glu-281, Arg-333 of α3 that interacts with Glu-293, and Arg-334 of α3 that interacts with Asp-282.
Figure 7.
The AID of nonphosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1–R734–AMP adopts a unique γ-subunit–bound conformation. A, cartoon representation of the AID (brown), its immediate flanking residues (yellow), and adjacent β- (cyan) and γ-subunit (magenta) regions with AID side chains shown in thin stick presentation. Key interface residues are shown in the inset. B, 2Fo − Fc composite omit map of the AID contoured at 1.0 σ in the same orientation as in A. A subset of AID residues with well-resolved densities is labeled. Residues 298–313 were not resolved. C, structural overlay of nonphosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1 (AID, green; γ-subunit, magenta) and phosphorylated AMPK α1β2γ1 (PDB code 4RER) (yellow) to highlight the extent of the AID rotation indicated by the arrow. D, AID mutational analysis. Met-289 and Glu-293 of the AID α1 helix interact with the γ-subunit in the structure of nonphosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1–R734–AMP but make no interactions in any structure of phosphorylated AMPK (n = 3; error bars, S.D.). ns, not significant (p > 0.05); **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001 (two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-test).
In addition to the unique conformation of the AID, two other features stood out. First, despite the relatively low kinase activity, the catalytic center adopted a fully active conformation with a fully resolved activation loop (Fig. S4, B and C) and a CBM linker with resolved C-interacting helix (Fig. 6B). Second, the modified benzyl ring of R734, which is connected through a freely rotatable single bond, adopted a 180° rotated configuration in the ligand-binding pocket, pointing toward the CBM instead of the KD (Fig. S7). Although the remaining parts of R734 and R739 had strong electron density, the density of the N-hydroxylamide group of the benzyl ring was relatively weak in all structures, indicating that the pocket can adopt the ring in different orientations (Fig. S7). The density indicates that in phosphorylated AMPK the orientation of the N-hydroxylamide group has a weak preference toward the KD, allowing the N-hydroxylamide to interact with the ATP-binding G-loop (Fig. 5, C and D), whereas in nonphosphorylated AMPK it preferentially pointed toward the CBM at the positively charged pocket entrance (Fig. S7).
The autoinhibitory domain of nonphosphorylated AMPK–R734–AMP adopts a unique γ-subunit–bound conformation
The AID of AMPK is in a dynamic equilibrium between a KD-bound (inactive, ATP-induced) state and a γ-subunit–bound (active, AMP-induced) state (28–30). Due to its dynamic nature, the AID has relatively poor density in all structures of AMPK and could not be modeled in the majority of structures of fully active AMPK, including the structures of phosphorylated AMPK bound to R734–AMP and R739–AMP. In the structure of nonphosphorylated AMPK α1β1(S108D)γ1 in the presence of R734, staurosporine, and AMP, the AID is bound to the γ-subunit in a conformation in which it is rotated relative to the structures of the more active phosphorylated AMPK (pAMPK) complexes α2β1γ1–991–AMP (Protein Data Bank (PDB) code 4CFE), pAMPK α1β2γ1–AMP (PDB code 4RER), and AMPK α2β1γ1–991–AMP (PDB code 5ISO) (Fig. 7C and Fig. S5, D–G). As a consequence, the AID helix α1 adopts a position that overlaps with the position of α3 in phosphorylated, AMP-bound AMPK (Fig. 7C and Fig. S5, D–G). In contrast to the different sets of AID residues involved in γ-subunit binding, the AID-binding residues within the well-resolved γ-subunit are largely identical for both conformations. Importantly, this conformation is not due to crystal packing as the AID is not involved in any substantial interactions with neighboring molecules in the crystals lattice (Fig. S6). To test whether this conformation affects the activity of AMPK, we introduced single and double mutations into Met-289 and Glu-293 of the short AID α1 helix. These residues are modeled at the AID/γ-subunit interface in nonphosphorylated AMPK (Fig. 7A) but in phosphorylated AMPK do not interact with either γ-subunit or KD. We then purified the nonphosphorylated WT and mutant proteins and determined their kinase activities in the presence or absence of AMP, R734, and A769662. The mutations moderately enhanced the activity of AMPK in all contexts (Fig. 7D), suggesting that the AID conformation seen in the structure of nonphosphorylated AMPK is less potent in shifting the equilibrium from the KD-bound state to the γ-subunit–bound state. In contrast to activity-compromising mutations, activity increases cannot be explained by protein destabilization and are therefore highly reliable indicators for the disruption of inhibitory interactions.
Recently, Willows et al. (26) determined the structure of nonphosphorylated AMPK α2β1γ1 in complex with 991, AMP, and staurosporine. 991 activates AMPK α2β1γ1 in conjunction with AMP much more potently than R734 and R739 (26-fold compared with 10-fold activation of AMPK α1β1γ1 by R734 and AMP), and the AID adopted a structure very similar to that seen in phosphorylated AMPK. Together, this suggests that the AID, besides the known active and inactive conformations, can also adopt a novel conformation that is associated with intermediate kinase activity.
Nonphosphorylated AMPK–R734–AMP adopts a stable activation loop conformation in crystals but requires phosphorylation for stabilization in solution
Although nonphosphorylated AMPK in the presence of R734 and AMP only moderately activates AMPK, the crystal structure revealed all hallmarks of an active kinase conformation, including a completely resolved activation loop (Fig. S4, B and C), similar to nonphosphorylated AMPK α2β1γ1–991 (26). AMPK belongs to the family of arginine-aspartate (RD) kinases, which are frequently regulated by activation loop phosphorylation. In RD kinases, the negatively charged phosphate rearranges the activation loop by binding to a positively charged pocket in the KD, which in turn arranges the arginine (R) and adjacent aspartate (D) of the catalytic loop to position the substrate phospho-acceptor site (Fig. S4A). AMPK is unusual in that the activation loop is directly stabilized by interaction with the stable core structure of AMPK, consisting of the β-subunit–interacting C terminus of the α-subunit (α-CTD) and the α/γ-subunit–interacting C terminus of the β-subunit (β-CTD; Fig. 8) (26, 31).
Figure 8.
The activation loop of nonphosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1–R734–AMP adopts an active conformation stabilized by binding to the AMPK core. The activation loop (dark green) is stabilized by interaction with the AMPK core complex (green, α-subunit; cyan, β-subunit). Key interface residues are shown in stick representation (yellow, phosphorylated AMPK–R734–AMP residues in overlay panel).
The fact that the nonphosphorylated activation loop has a stable, active conformation in the crystal structures of AMPK α2β1γ1–991 (26) and AMPK α1β1γ1–R734 (Fig. 8 and Fig. S4, B and C), even though these complexes are only partially active, suggests that they may represent a minor fraction of total conformations that is captured in the crystallization snapshot due to their reduced dynamics. Moreover, the conformation could further be influenced by binding of the ATP-competitive inhibitor staurosporine, which stabilizes AMPK in a largely closed (substrate bound–mimicking) conformation. We therefore used hydrogen/deuterium exchange MS (HDX-MS) to analyze the conformational landscape of the activation loop in solution. As shown in Fig. 9 and Figs. S8–S10, in solution the activation loop, as well as the activation loop–interacting segment of the β-subunit (β-subunit shown in Figs. S8–S10), indeed became strongly stabilized by phosphorylation and moderately stabilized by staurosporine, clearly indicating that the crystal structure represents a minor conformation snapshot.
Figure 9.
Phosphorylation stabilizes the activation loop in solution. A, kinase domain structure of AMPK α1β1γ1–R734–AMP with activation loop highlighted in red. B–D, perturbation (difference) HDX-MS heat maps overlaid on the structure shown in A. Relative changes in protection against hydrogen/deuterium exchange are indicated by the color bar in the center. Gray indicates no change or unresolved regions. The full maps are shown in Fig. S8–S10.
In addition, binding of staurosporine, which induces the closed (substrate-bound) conformation of the kinase domain, stabilizes the AID (Fig. 9D). This is consistent with the proposed inability of the AID to bind the closed kinase domain conformation (28, 30, 32), which further shifts the equilibrium to the more stable AMP-induced AID–γ-subunit interaction.
Nucleotide occupancy in pAMPK–R734 in the absence of added nucleotides
Several structures of holo-AMPK have been solved in the AMP-bound state, but none have been solved in the apo or ATP-bound state. AMP binding at CBS3 is thought to be critical for allosteric AMPK regulation because it structurally stabilizes the interaction between the AMP-sensing αRIM2 and AMP-bound CBS3 (29, 31). This interaction in turn shifts the AID/αRIM1 equilibrium from the inhibitory KD-bound conformation to the γ-subunit–bound conformation as a mechanism for direct allosteric kinase activation (28–31). To gain insight into nucleotide occupancy and the conformation of AMPK with unoccupied CBS3, we determined the crystal structure of phosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1–R734 in the absence of added AMP. As shown in Fig. 10A, the overall structure is very similar to that of pAMPK–R734–AMP. Although we see density at αRIM2, the density was weak. The composite omit map in Fig. 10B and Fig. S11 revealed that AMP was stably bound at CBS4 as predicted by previous biochemical analysis (33, 34). We further detected very weak AMP density at CBS3 (too weak to build an AMP in the model), indicating very low occupancy, whereas no reliable density could be seen at CBS1 (Fig. 10B and Fig. S11). These results confirm the stable binding of AMP at CBS4 as well as the recent reassignment of CBS3 and CBS1 as the exchangeable higher- and lower-affinity nucleotide binding-sites, respectively (35).
Figure 10.
AMP is bound at CBS4 in the structure of phosphorylated AMPK α1β1γ1–R734 in the absence of added nucleotides. A, structure overview. B, 2Fo − Fc composite omit map contoured at 1 σ around the three AMP-binding sites. The omit map is overlaid with the transparent cartoon structure of the heteromeric complex and a stick model of AMP at CBS4. For orientation, it is also overlaid with stick models (white) of the three AMP molecules of pAMPK in the presence of added AMP (PDB code 6C9F; see Fig. 5A).
Discussion
An ADaM site ligand can isotype-selectively separate direct AMPK activation and protection against activation loop dephosphorylation
AMPK is a central signaling hub that phosphorylates and regulates numerous targets. Consequently, AMPK dysregulation is associated with a spectrum of metabolic diseases, spanning from diabetes and obesity to cancer, inflammation, and cardiometabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. The pleiotropic effects of AMPK's known physiological activators, AMP and ADP, have made it challenging to clearly attribute complex effects to AMPK activity states and to therapeutically regulate AMPK activity in different tissues with high selectivity. In 2006, Abbot Laboratories developed compound A769662 (36), the first example of a group of small molecules that activate AMPK with high specificity by binding the ADaM site at the KD/CBM interface (22). A limitation of this class of compounds is their preference for AMPK complexes that contain the β1-subunit and phosphorylated CBM Ser-108.
The ADaM sites formed by β1- and β2-subunits differ only by two CBM residues (defined as residues within 5 Å to the KD), Thr-106 and Asn-111 in β1 complexes, which correspond to Ile-106 and Asp-111 in β2 complexes, respectively (see Fig. S12). Consistently, the high-affinity β2 ADaM site compound SC4 forms a hydrogen bond with β2 Asp-111 but not with β1 Asn-111, providing a structural rationale for its elevated β2 selectivity (37). β2 Asp-111 and β1 Asn-111 form different polar interaction networks with phospho-Ser-108, which in turn forms strong ionic interactions with Lys-29 and Lys-31 of the KD to stabilize the ADaM site. The carboxyl group of 991 further increases stability of this network by direct interaction with KD Lys-29 (Fig. 5E), suggesting that it may contribute to isoform selectivity. In addition, removal of the carboxyl group reduces uptake by hepatocyte organic anion transport proteins and would therefore be expected to decrease the liver cell:muscle cell uptake ratio.
The 991 derivatives R734 and R739 lack the carboxyl group but still activate recombinant β1 complexes to a larger degree than β2 complexes. Strikingly, R739 failed to allosterically activate E. coli–purified AMPK α1β2γ1 but robustly decreased activation loop dephosphorylation, similar to ADP, which binds the nucleotide-binding sites in the γ-subunit more than 60 Å away from the ADaM site. Therefore, these two activities can be pharmacologically separated by both ADaM site–binding and by γ-subunit–binding compounds. Direct allosteric activation stabilizes the active kinase conformation (in the case of ADaM site agonists by stabilizing the regulatory αC helix of the KD (22)). In contrast, protection against activation loop dephosphorylation is likely determined by the conformation of the linker between the CBM of the β-subunit at the ADaM site and the C-terminal scaffolding domain of the β-subunit at the γ-subunit (22, 31). This suggests that R739 may be unable to induce formation of a properly positioned αC-stabilizing helix in the CBM linker of the α1β2γ1 complex but may sufficiently reposition the linker to shield the activation loop against phosphatases. Details of how ligands change the conformation of the linker remain unknown in the absence of a structure of holo-AMPK in the inactive, ATP-bound state.
The AID adopts a conformation in partially active AMPK that is associated with reduced activity
Activation loop phosphorylation catalytically activates E. coli–produced AMPK ∼100-fold (38, 39), and AMP activates it an additional 2-fold (in mammalian cells up to 10-fold (7)). The combination of R734 and AMP only partially activated nonphosphorylated AMPK (∼10-fold), but the crystal structure of AMPK α1β1γ1 showed the hallmarks of an active kinase, including a fully resolved activation loop. This is reminiscent of the recently reported structure of nonphosphorylated AMPK α2β1γ1 bound to 991 and AMP (26). Although 991 activates nonphosphorylated AMPK more potently than R734, it fails to fully activate the kinase; however, the kinase domain also adopted an active conformation with fully resolved activation loop. Our HDX-MS analysis demonstrated that this conformation in AMPK α1β1γ1 represents a minor fraction that likely crystallizes more easily due to its higher order and that, for the majority of AMPK, phosphorylation is required for full activation loop stabilization. Consistently, phosphorylation is also required for full activity of AMPK bound by 991 and AMP in mammalian cells (26).
A surprise finding was that the AID adopted a novel conformation in which its α1 helix, rather than its α3 helix, interacted with the γ-subunit. The AID can therefore interact with at least three different surfaces within AMPK: (i) the KD as seen in the inactive, ATP-bound and nonphosphorylated conformation; (ii) the γ-subunit via AID α3 in the fully active phosphorylated and AMP-bound conformation; and (iii) the γ-subunit via AID α1 in this structure of partially active, nonphosphorylated and AMP-bound AMPK. To probe for the biological relevance of this conformation, we tested the effect of mutations in AID α3 at the AID/γ interface on the kinase activity of largely or fully active, phosphorylated AMPK. The fact that these mutations increased the kinase activity suggests that the partially active conformation competes predominantly with the fully active conformation, not the inactive conformation.
The AID in this structure was better resolved than in the corresponding structure of fully active phosphorylated AMPK. However, the mutations designed to disrupt the AID α1/γ-subunit interface increased AMPK activity, implying that this conformation is more stable but less active than the competing AID conformation seen in all active AMPK structures with resolved AID. The presence of the AID either in an unresolved state or in at least three different, distinct conformations as well as the high B factor of the AID in all resolved structures illustrates the highly dynamic nature of the AID in the context of holo-AMPK, consistent with its key regulatory switch role in allosteric activation by adenine nucleotides.
Experimental procedures
Chemical synthesis
Synthesis schemes for compounds 991, R734, and R739 are provided in the supporting information.
DNA construct for crystallization
Human AMPK His-α1(13–550)-β1(76–272)-γ1(24–327) with deletion of the serine- and threonine-rich (ST) loop in the α-subunit (amino acids 476–529) and S108D mutation in the β-subunit was cloned into a tricistronic vector. Mutations were introduced by QuikChange site directed mutagenesis (Stratagene) or standard PCR-based methods. All constructs and mutations were sequence-verified.
AMPK expression and purification
AMPK expression plasmids were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). Cells were grown in LB medium to an A600 of ∼1 at 28 °C and induced with 100 μm isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside at 16 °C overnight. Cell pellets were resuspended in 25 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mm NaCl, 25 mm imidazole, 10% glycerol, 5 mm β-mercaptoethanol and lysed using a French press with pressure set to 900 pascals. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation for 30 min at 20,000 × g, passed over a 10-ml HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare), and eluted with 25 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mm NaCl, 500 mm imidazole, 10% glycerol, 5 mm β-mercaptoethanol. The eluted AMPK was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography through a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare) in 25 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mm NaCl, 5 mm MgCl2, 1 mm EDTA, 10% glycerol, 2 mm DTT. AMPK was phosphorylated by incubation with Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase β at a 1:0.02 molar ratio in 0.2 mm AMP, 0.2 mm ATP, 2 mm CaCl2, 10 mm DTT, 1 μm calmodulin at room temperature overnight (16 h). The phosphorylated AMPK was repurified by size-exclusion chromatography through a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 column in 25 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mm NaCl, 5 mm MgCl2, 1 mm EDTA, 10% glycerol, 2 mm DTT. The protein eluted from the gel filtration column at a volume corresponding to the size of a monomeric complex at a purity ≥95% as judged by SDS-PAGE (Fig. S3).
Crystallization
Purified nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated AMPK fractions were incubated with a 3-fold molar excess of staurosporine for 3 h at 4 °C, spin-concentrated to ∼7 mg/ml, and incubated with R734 or R739 at molar ratios of protein:compound of 1:5 in the presence and absence of 5 mm AMP. Crystals of both R734-bound and R739-bound phosphorylated AMPK in complex with AMP and staurosporine were grown at ∼20 °C in sitting drops containing 0.3 μl of purified protein at ∼7 mg/ml and 0.3 μl of reservoir solution consisting of 0.1 m trisodium acetate, pH 5.6, 0.2 m ammonium acetate, 15% (w/v) PEG 4000. Crystals of phosphorylated R734-bound AMPK in the absence of added nucleotides were grown at ∼20 °C in sitting drops containing 0.3 μl of purified protein at ∼7 mg/ml and 0.3 μl of reservoir solution consisting of 0.1 m triammonium citrate, pH 7.0, 12% (w/v) PEG 3350. Crystals of nonphosphorylated R734-bound AMPK in complex with AMP were grown at ∼20 °C in sitting drops containing 0.3 μl of purified protein at ∼7 mg/ml and 0.3 μl of reservoir solution consisting of 0.2 m magnesium formate.
Structure determination and refinement
X-ray diffraction data were collected at 21-ID of the Life Science Collaborative Access Team at the Advanced Photon Source. The observed reflections were reduced, merged using MOSFLM, and scaled with SCALA of the CCP4 package (40). The structures were solved by molecular replacement performed using the CCP4 program Phaser (41) with the structure of AMPK in complex with 991 (22) (PDB code 4CFE) as an initial search model. The program Coot (42) was used to manually fit the protein model. Model refinement was performed with the PHENIX program package (43). The statistics of data collection and the model refinement are summarized in Table S1.
Cell-based phospho-acetyl-CoA carboxylase (pACC) ELISAs
HepG2 cells (200,000 cells/well seeded a day before and starved for 2 h in low-glucose medium), LHCN-M2 cells (20,000 cells/well differentiated for 5 days), and A549 cells (20,000 cells/well seeded a day before) in 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in the medium containing serial dilutions of the test samples. The reaction was stopped using 100 μl of 4% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were washed and incubated for 1 h at room temperature on a shaker in blocking buffer followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with 200 μl of anti-phospho-acetyl-CoA carboxylase (Ser-79) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, catalog number 3661) diluted in blocking buffer (1:1000). After the incubation, the cells were washed and incubated with 200 μl of horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody diluted in blocking buffer (1:1000) for 1 h at room temperature. The stained cells were washed, and chemiluminescent reagent was added. Chemiluminescence was read using a Victor plate reader (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) within 5 min. The EC50 determination was executed using Prism software version 7 (GraphPad, Inc.). Means of EC50 values acquired from multiple experiments (n ≥ 2) are shown in Fig. 2A.
Proliferation assay
Cells were plated in ViewPlate96 96-well plates (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) in duplicate replicates. The compound dilutions for the six-point screens (from 10 to 0.41 m, 3-fold dilution) were performed manually. Following incubation with the compound for 48 h, cells were fixed with 2.0% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS (Ca2+/Mg2+-free) for 30 min, washed with PBS, stained for 60 min with a 6 ng/ml solution of 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR) in PBS. Cells were stored at 4 °C in PBS for at least 16 h before imaging to allow stain to equilibrate. A Zeiss Axiovert S100 inverted fluorescence microscope, equipped with a Plan-NEOFLUAR 10× objective (Carl Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY) and a Hamamatsu Lightningcure 200 mercury-xenon light source with an Omega Optical XF57 quad filter (Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan), was used for capturing images. Nine images per well were taken, in an adjacent grid pattern, in each well of the 96-well plates of treated tumor cells. Images were analyzed in a 12-bit format using segmentation and morphological routines contained in the Image Pro software package (Media Cybernetics Inc., Bethesda, MD). The EC50 curve fitting was executed with MathLab software version 6.5 (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA). For cell cycle analysis, DNA content of each nucleus in the sample images was plotted and smoothed using the Lowess method (48). Apoptosis was assessed by manual inspection of the cell cycle profile and fragmented nuclei as assessed by the imaging analysis. Endoreduplication was assessed by manual inspection based upon enlarged nuclei and the presence of the 8N population.
AMPK [γ-32P]ATP kinase assay
10 nm AMPK was incubated with 50 μm biotin-SAMS peptide (biotin-HMRSAMSGLHLVKRR; synthesized by Peptide 2.0 Inc., Chantilly, VA), 2 mm DTT, and 0.25 μl of [γ-32P]ATP/15-μl reaction in kinase buffer (25 mm Tris, pH 7.4, 12 mm MgCl2, 1 mm Na3VO4, 5 mm NaF) for 20 min at room temperature in the presence or absence of various concentrations of R734, R739, or 991 for activity dose-response curve determination (Fig. 3A and Fig. S1) or in the presence or absence of 20 μm R734, 20 μm A769662, or 200 μm AMP for single-point kinase activity determination (Figs. 6A and 7D). Reactions were terminated by addition of 0.5 volume of 7.5 m guanidine hydrochloride solution in water, and reactions were spotted on a SAM 2® Biotin Capture Membrane (Promega). The membrane was washed once for 30 s with 2 m NaCl, three times for 2 min with 2 m NaCl, four times for 2 min with 2 m NaCl in 1% H3PO4, and two times for 30 s with deionized water to remove unbound reaction components. After drying the membrane at room temperature for 30–60 min, signals were quantitated by phosphorimaging analysis.
AMPK α-pThr-172 phosphatase protection assay
5 μm phosphorylated AMPK protein was incubated with either 4 μm H6GST-PP2Cα in 25 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mm NaCl, 5 mm MgCl2, 1 mm EDTA, 10% glycerol, 2 mm DTT or 100 units of λ-phosphatase (New England Biolabs) in 50 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mm NaCl, 2 mm DTT, 0.01% (v/v) Brij 35, 1 mm MnCl2 in the presence or absence of 20 μm R734, 20 μm R739, 20 μm A769662, or 200 μm AMP in a total volume of 20 μl for 30 or 60 min at room temperature. Reactions were stopped by addition of SDS sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with an AMPK α1 pThr-174–specific antibody (Abcam) following standard protocols.
HDX detected by mass spectrometry
Differential HDX-MS experiments were conducted as described previously with a few modifications (44).
Peptide identification
Peptides were identified using tandem MS (MS/MS) with an Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q Exactive, Thermo Fisher). Product ion spectra were acquired in data-dependent mode with the top five most abundant ions selected for the product ion analysis per scan event. The MS/MS data files were submitted to Mascot (Matrix Science) for peptide identification. Peptides included in the HDX analysis peptide set had a Mascot score greater than 20, and the MS/MS spectra were verified by manual inspection. The Mascot search was repeated against a decoy (reverse) sequence, and ambiguous identifications were ruled out and not included in the HDX peptide set.
HDX-MS analysis
Protein (10 μm) was incubated with the respective ligands at a 1:10 protein:ligand molar ratio for 1 h at room temperature. Next, 5 μl of sample was diluted into 20 μl of D2O buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 2 mm DTT) and incubated for various time points (0, 10, 60, 300, 900, and 3,600s) at 4 °C. The deuterium exchange was then slowed by mixing with 25 μl of cold (4 °C) 3 m urea, 1% TFA. Quenched samples were immediately injected into the HDX platform. Upon injection, samples were passed through an immobilized pepsin column (2 mm × 2 cm) at 200 μl min−1, and the digested peptides were captured on a 2-mm × 1-cm C8 trap column (Agilent) and desalted. Peptides were separated across a 2.1-mm × 5-cm C18 column (1.9 μl of Hypersil Gold, Thermo Fisher) with a linear gradient of 4–40% CH3CN, 0.3% formic acid over 5 min. Sample handling, protein digestion, and peptide separation were conducted at 4 °C. Mass spectrometric data were acquired using an Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Exactive, Thermo Fisher). HDX analyses were performed in triplicate with single preparations of each protein–ligand complex. The intensity weighted mean m/z centroid value of each peptide envelope was calculated and subsequently converted into a percentage of deuterium incorporation. This was accomplished by determining the observed averages of the undeuterated and fully deuterated spectra using the conventional formula described elsewhere (45). Statistical significance for the differential HDX data was determined by an unpaired t test for each time point, a procedure that is integrated into the HDX Workbench software (44). Corrections for back-exchange were made on the basis of an estimated 70% deuterium recovery and accounting for the known 80% deuterium content of the deuterium exchange buffer.
Data rendering
Deuterium uptake for each peptide was calculated as the average of %D for all on-exchange time points, and the difference in average %D values between the apo and ligand-bound samples is presented as a heat map with a color code given at the bottom of each figure (warm colors for deprotection and cool colors for protection). Peptides are colored by the software automatically to display significant differences, determined either by a >5% difference (less or more protection) in average deuterium uptake between the two states or by using the results of unpaired t tests at each time point (p value <0.05 for any two time points or a p value <0.01 for any single time point). Peptides with nonsignificant changes between the two states are colored gray. The exchange at the first two residues for any given peptide is not colored. Each peptide bar in the heat map view displays the average Δ%D values, associated standard deviation, and the charge state.
Immunoblot analysis of compound-stimulated Raptor, ACC, and AMPK phosphorylation in cells
HepG2 cells were cultured, treated, and lysed following a published protocol (46). Specifically, cells were incubated for 1 h with increasing doses of R734, R739, 991, and A769662 in Krebs-HEPES buffer (20 mm Na-HEPES, pH 7.4, 118 mm NaCl, 3.5 mm KCl, 1.3 mm CaCl2, 1.2 mm MgSO4, 1.2 mm KH2PO4, 10 mm glucose, 0.1% (w/v) BSA) and lysed in 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 50 mm NaF, 5 mm sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm EGTA, 250 mm mannitol, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1 mm DTT, 1 mm benzamidine, 0.1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 μg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with an AMPK α1/α2 pThr-174/Thr-172–specific antibody (Abcam), an AMPK α1 antibody (Y365) (Abcam), a Raptor pSer-792–specific antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), a Raptor antibody (24C12) (Cell Signaling Technology), an ACC pSer-79–specific antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), an ACC antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), and a β-actin antibody (Abcam), respectively, following standard protocols.
Colorimetric phosphatase assay
20 μm phosphorylated AMPK substrate peptide (GSTKMRRVApTLVDLGYKK where pT is phosphothreonine) (47) was incubated with H2O or 20 μm R734, 20 μm R739, 4 μm 991, or 20 μm A769662 in the presence and absence of 4 μm H6GST-PP2Cα in a total volume of 200 μl of 10 mm Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl for 30 min at room temperature. Phosphate release from pSer-175 from the phosphopeptide was determined by colorimetric assay (BioVision) and quantitated by the phosphate standard curve shown in Fig. S2A.
Author contributions
Y. Y., X. E. Z., S. J. S., J. S. B., Y. H., P. R. G., H. E. X., and K. M. formal analysis; Y. Y., X. E. Z., S. J. N., S. J. S., J. S. B., Y. H., and K. M. validation; Y. Y., X. E. Z., S. J. N., S. J. S., Y. L., J. S. B., Y. H., and P. R. G. investigation; Y. Y., S. J. N., S. J. S., Y. L., J. S. B., Y. H., and P. R. G. methodology; Y. Y., X. E. Z., S. J. N., S. J. S., Y. L., J. S. B., Y. H., P. R. G., and H. E. X. writing-review and editing; X. E. Z., S. J. S., and K. M. data curation; S. J. S., J. S. B., Y. H., and K. M. conceptualization; S. J. S., P. R. G., and K. M. resources; S. J. S., J. S. B., Y. H., P. R. G., H. E. X., and K. M. supervision; S. J. S., J. S. B., Y. H., P. R. G., H. E. X., and K. M. funding acquisition; S. J. S. and P. R. G. project administration; K. M. visualization; K. M. writing-original draft.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Michelle Martin for administrative support and staff members of the Life Science Collaborative Access Team of the Advanced Photon Source (APS) for assistance in data collection at the beam lines of sector 21, which is in part funded by the Michigan Economic Development Corporation and the Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor under Grant 085P1000817. Use of APS was supported by the Office of Science of the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357.
This work was supported by the Van Andel Research Institute (to H. E. X. and K. M.); National Institutes of Health Grants R01 GM102545 and R01 GM129436 (to K. M.) and DK071662 (to H. E. X.); National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 31300245 (to H. E. X.); Ministry of Science and Technology (China) Grants 2012ZX09301001, 2012CB910403, 2013CB910600, XDB08020303, and 2013ZX09507001 (to H. E. X.); and Amway (China) (to H. E. X.). S. J. S., Y. L., and Y. H. are or have been employees and shareholders of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
This article contains Figs. S1–S12 and compound synthesis schemes.
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (codes 6C9F, 6C9G, 6C9H, and 6C9J) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://wwpdb.org/).
- AMPK
- AMP-activated protein kinase
- ADaM site
- allosteric drug and metabolite-binding site
- AICAR
- 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide
- α-CTD
- C-terminal domain of the α-subunit
- AID
- autoinhibitory domain
- αRIM
- α-regulatory subunit interaction motif
- β-CTD
- C-terminal domain of the β-subunit
- CBM
- carbohydrate-binding module
- CBS
- cystathionine β-synthetase
- HDX
- hydrogen/deuterium exchange
- LKB1
- liver kinase B1
- KD
- kinase domain
- r.m.s.d.
- root mean square deviation
- ZMP
- 5-amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide ribonucleotide
- pAMPK
- phosphorylated AMPK
- ACC
- acetyl-CoA carboxylase
- pACC
- phospho-acetyl-CoA carboxylase
- %D
- percentage of deuterium
- PP2Cα
- protein phosphatase 2Cα.
References
- 1. Cheung P. C., Salt I. P., Davies S. P., Hardie D. G., and Carling D. (2000) Characterization of AMP-activated protein kinase γ-subunit isoforms and their role in AMP binding. Biochem. J. 346, 659–669 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Stapleton D., Gao G., Michell B. J., Widmer J., Mitchelhill K., Teh T., House C. M., Witters L. A., and Kemp B. E. (1994) Mammalian 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase non-catalytic subunits are homologs of proteins that interact with yeast Snf1 protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29343–29346 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Thornton C., Snowden M. A., and Carling D. (1998) Identification of a novel AMP-activated protein kinase β subunit isoform that is highly expressed in skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12443–12450 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Birk J. B., and Wojtaszewski J. F. (2006) Predominant α2/β2/γ3 AMPK activation during exercise in human skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 577, 1021–1032 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cokorinos E. C., Delmore J., Reyes A. R., Albuquerque B., Kjøbsted R., Jørgensen N. O., Tran J. L., Jatkar A., Cialdea K., Esquejo R. M., Meissen J., Calabrese M. F., Cordes J., Moccia R., Tess D., et al. (2017) Activation of skeletal muscle AMPK promotes glucose disposal and glucose lowering in non-human primates and mice. Cell Metab. 25, 1147–1159.e10 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Stephenne X., Foretz M., Taleux N., van der Zon G. C., Sokal E., Hue L., Viollet B., and Guigas B. (2011) Metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase in primary human hepatocytes by decreasing cellular energy status. Diabetologia 54, 3101–3110 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gowans G. J., Hawley S. A., Ross F. A., and Hardie D. G. (2013) AMP is a true physiological regulator of AMP-activated protein kinase by both allosteric activation and enhancing net phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 18, 556–566 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hardie D. G., Schaffer B. E., and Brunet A. (2016) AMPK: an energy-sensing pathway with multiple inputs and outputs. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 190–201 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Steinberg G. R., and Kemp B. E. (2009) AMPK in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 89, 1025–1078 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hardie D. G., Ross F. A., and Hawley S. A. (2012) AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 251–262 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hardie D. G. (2013) AMPK: a target for drugs and natural products with effects on both diabetes and cancer. Diabetes 62, 2164–2172 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hardie D. G., Ross F. A., and Hawley S. A. (2012) AMP-activated protein kinase: a target for drugs both ancient and modern. Chem. Biol. 19, 1222–1236 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Meng S., Cao J., He Q., Xiong L., Chang E., Radovick S., Wondisford F. E., and He L. (2015) Metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase by promoting formation of the αβγ heterotrimeric complex. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 3793–3802 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhang C. S., Li M., Ma T., Zong Y., Cui J., Feng J. W., Wu Y. Q., Lin S. Y., and Lin S. C. (2016) Metformin activates AMPK through the lysosomal pathway. Cell Metab. 24, 521–522 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cao J., Meng S., Chang E., Beckwith-Fickas K., Xiong L., Cole R. N., Radovick S., Wondisford F. E., and He L. (2014) Low concentrations of metformin suppress glucose production in hepatocytes through AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). J. Biol. Chem. 289, 20435–20446 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. He L., and Wondisford F. E. (2015) Metformin action: concentrations matter. Cell Metab. 21, 159–162 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Foretz M., Guigas B., Bertrand L., Pollak M., and Viollet B. (2014) Metformin: from mechanisms of action to therapies. Cell Metab. 20, 953–966 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rena G., Hardie D. G., and Pearson E. R. (2017) The mechanisms of action of metformin. Diabetologia 60, 1577–1585 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Myers R. W., Guan H. P., Ehrhart J., Petrov A., Prahalada S., Tozzo E., Yang X., Kurtz M. M., Trujillo M., Gonzalez Trotter D., Feng D., Xu S., Eiermann G., Holahan M. A., Rubins D., et al. (2017) Systemic pan-AMPK activator MK-8722 improves glucose homeostasis but induces cardiac hypertrophy. Science 357, 507–511 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hardie D. G. (2017) Targeting an energy sensor to treat diabetes. Science 357, 455–456 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Scott J. W., van Denderen B. J., Jorgensen S. B., Honeyman J. E., Steinberg G. R., Oakhill J. S., Iseli T. J., Koay A., Gooley P. R., Stapleton D., and Kemp B. E. (2008) Thienopyridone drugs are selective activators of AMP-activated protein kinase β1-containing complexes. Chem. Biol. 15, 1220–1230 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Xiao B., Sanders M. J., Carmena D., Bright N. J., Haire L. F., Underwood E., Patel B. R., Heath R. B., Walker P. A., Hallen S., Giordanetto F., Martin S. R., Carling D., and Gamblin S. J. (2013) Structural basis of AMPK regulation by small molecule activators. Nat. Commun. 4, 3017 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Willows R., Navaratnam N., Lima A., Read J., and Carling D. (2017) Effect of different γ-subunit isoforms on the regulation of AMPK. Biochem. J. 474, 1741–1754 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Göransson O., McBride A., Hawley S. A., Ross F. A., Shpiro N., Foretz M., Viollet B., Hardie D. G., and Sakamoto K. (2007) Mechanism of action of A-769662, a valuable tool for activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 32549–32560 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Scott J. W., Ling N., Issa S. M., Dite T. A., O'Brien M. T., Chen Z. P., Galic S., Langendorf C. G., Steinberg G. R., Kemp B. E., and Oakhill J. S. (2014) Small molecule drug A-769662 and AMP synergistically activate naive AMPK independent of upstream kinase signaling. Chem. Biol. 21, 619–627 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Willows R., Sanders M. J., Xiao B., Patel B. R., Martin S. R., Read J., Wilson J. R., Hubbard J., Gamblin S. J., and Carling D. (2017) Phosphorylation of AMPK by upstream kinases is required for activity in mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 474, 3059–3073 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Calabrese M. F., Rajamohan F., Harris M. S., Caspers N. L., Magyar R., Withka J. M., Wang H., Borzilleri K. A., Sahasrabudhe P. V., Hoth L. R., Geoghegan K. F., Han S., Brown J., Subashi T. A., Reyes A. R., et al. (2014) Structural basis for AMPK activation: natural and synthetic ligands regulate kinase activity from opposite poles by different molecular mechanisms. Structure 22, 1161–1172 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Li X., Wang L., Zhou X. E., Ke J., de Waal P. W., Gu X., Tan M. H., Wang D., Wu D., Xu H. E., and Melcher K. (2015) Structural basis of AMPK regulation by adenine nucleotides and glycogen. Cell Res. 25, 50–66 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chen L., Xin F. J., Wang J., Hu J., Zhang Y. Y., Wan S., Cao L. S., Lu C., Li P., Yan S. F., Neumann D., Schlattner U., Xia B., Wang Z. X., and Wu J. W. (2013) Conserved regulatory elements in AMPK. Nature 498, E8–E10 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Xin F. J., Wang J., Zhao R. Q., Wang Z. X., and Wu J. W. (2013) Coordinated regulation of AMPK activity by multiple elements in the α-subunit. Cell Res. 23, 1237–1240 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Xiao B., Sanders M. J., Underwood E., Heath R., Mayer F. V., Carmena D., Jing C., Walker P. A., Eccleston J. F., Haire L. F., Saiu P., Howell S. A., Aasland R., Martin S. R., Carling D., et al. (2011) Structure of mammalian AMPK and its regulation by ADP. Nature 472, 230–233 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chen L., Jiao Z. H., Zheng L. S., Zhang Y. Y., Xie S. T., Wang Z. X., and Wu J. W. (2009) Structural insight into the autoinhibition mechanism of AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature 459, 1146–1149 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chen L., Wang J., Zhang Y. Y., Yan S. F., Neumann D., Schlattner U., Wang Z. X., and Wu J. W. (2012) AMP-activated protein kinase undergoes nucleotide-dependent conformational changes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 716–718 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Xiao B., Heath R., Saiu P., Leiper F. C., Leone P., Jing C., Walker P. A., Haire L., Eccleston J. F., Davis C. T., Martin S. R., Carling D., and Gamblin S. J. (2007) Structural basis for AMP binding to mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature 449, 496–500 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Gu X., Yan Y., Novick S. J., Kovach A., Goswami D., Ke J., Tan M. H. E., Wang L., Li X., de Waal P. W., Webb M. R., Griffin P. R., Xu H. E., and Melcher K. (2017) Deconvoluting AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK) adenine nucleotide binding and sensing. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 12653–12666 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Cool B., Zinker B., Chiou W., Kifle L., Cao N., Perham M., Dickinson R., Adler A., Gagne G., Iyengar R., Zhao G., Marsh K., Kym P., Jung P., Camp H. S., and Frevert E. (2006) Identification and characterization of a small molecule AMPK activator that treats key components of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 3, 403–416 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ngoei K. R. W., Langendorf C. G., Ling N. X. Y., Hoque A., Varghese S., Camerino M. A., Walker S. R., Bozikis Y. E., Dite T. A., Ovens A. J., Smiles W. J., Jacobs R., Huang H., Parker M. W., Scott J. W., et al. (2018) Structural determinants for small-molecule activation of skeletal muscle AMPK α2β2γ1 by the glucose importagog SC4. Cell Chem. Biol. 25, 728–737.e9 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Hawley S. A., Pan D. A., Mustard K. J., Ross L., Bain J., Edelman A. M., Frenguelli B. G., and Hardie D. G. (2005) Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-β is an alternative upstream kinase for AMP-activated protein kinase. Cell Metab. 2, 9–19 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sanders M. J., Grondin P. O., Hegarty B. D., Snowden M. A., and Carling D. (2007) Investigating the mechanism for AMP activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Biochem. J. 403, 139–148 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Feng D., Biftu T., Romero F. A., Kekec A., Dropinski J., Kassick A., Xu S., Kurtz M. M., Gollapudi A., Shao Q., Yang X., Lu K., Zhou G., Kemp D., Myers R. W., Guan H. P., et al. (2018) Discovery of MK-8722: a systemic, direct pan-activator of AMP-activated protein kinase. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 9, 39–44 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. McCoy A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., Adams P. D., Winn M. D., Storoni L. C., and Read R. J. (2007) Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Emsley P., and Cowtan K. (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Shao D., Oka S., Liu T., Zhai P., Ago T., Sciarretta S., Li H., and Sadoshima J. (2014) A redox-dependent mechanism for regulation of AMPK activation by thioredoxin1 during energy starvation. Cell Metab. 19, 232–245 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Pascal B. D., Willis S., Lauer J. L., Landgraf R. R., West G. M., Marciano D., Novick S., Goswami D., Chalmers M. J., and Griffin P. R. (2012) HDX workbench: software for the analysis of H/D exchange MS data. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 23, 1512–1521 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Oligschlaeger Y., Miglianico M., Chanda D., Scholz R., Thali R. F., Tuerk R., Stapleton D. I., Gooley P. R., and Neumann D. (2015) The recruitment of AMP-activated protein kinase to glycogen is regulated by autophosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 11715–11728 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Hardie D. G., Salt I. P., and Davies S. P. (2000) Analysis of the role of the AMP-activated protein kinase in the response to cellular stress. Methods Mol. Biol. 99, 63–74 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Yan Y., Gu X., Xu H. E., and Melcher K. (2018) A highly sensitive non-radioactive activity assay for AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Methods Protoc. 1, 3 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Hutcheson M. C. (1995) Trimmed Resistant Weighted Scatterplot Smooth. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Statistics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.