Skip to main content
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2018 Dec 26;9(1):180–191. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4707

Noninvasive sampling reveals population genetic structure in the Royle’s pika, Ochotona roylei, in the western Himalaya

Sabuj Bhattacharyya 1,, Farah Ishtiaq 1
PMCID: PMC6342111  PMID: 30680105

Abstract

Understanding population genetic structure of climate‐sensitive herbivore species is important as it provides useful insights on how shifts in environmental conditions can alter their distribution and abundance. Herbivore responses to the environment can have a strong indirect cascading effect on community structure. This is particularly important for Royle's pika (Lagomorpha: Ochotona roylei), a herbivorous talus‐dwelling species in alpine ecosystem, which forms a major prey base for many carnivores in the Himalayan arc. In this study, we used seven polymorphic microsatellite loci to detect evidence for recent changes in genetic diversity and population structure in Royle's pika across five locations sampled between 8 and 160 km apart in the western Himalaya. Using four clustering approaches, we found the presence of significant contemporary genetic structure in Royle's pika populations. The detected genetic structure could be primarily attributed to the landscape features in alpine habitat (e.g., wide lowland valleys, rivers) that may act as semipermeable barriers to gene flow and distribution of food plants, which are key determinants in spatial distribution of herbivores. Pika showed low inbreeding coefficients (F IS) and a high level of pairwise relatedness for individuals within 1 km suggesting low dispersal abilities of talus‐dwelling pikas. We have found evidence of a recent population bottleneck, possibly due to effects of environmental disturbances (e.g., snow melting patterns or thermal stress). Our results reveal significant evidence of isolation by distance in genetic differentiation (F ST range = 0.04–0.19). This is the first population genetics study on Royle's pika, which helps to address evolutionary consequences of climate change which are expected to significantly affect the distribution and population dynamics in this talus‐dwelling species.

Keywords: Alpine, bottleneck, India, Ochotona roylei, population genetics, Royle’s pika, western Himalaya

1. INTRODUCTION

Over the past century, climate has been changing at a faster pace in alpine habitats than in other ecosystems, for which many species must either adapt or migrate to areas with optimal conditions (Naftz et al., 2002; Shrestha, Gautam, & Bawa, 2012). Among mountain‐dwelling species, pikas (Ochotona species), in particular, have experienced a significant contraction in their lower elevation range (Moritz et al. 2008). For example, climate‐induced heat (Beever, Brussard, & Berger, 2003), cold, or nutritional stress (Wilkening, Ray, Beever, & Brussard, 2011) led to historical extinctions of local populations and recent range contraction. While dispersal to higher elevation may allow pikas to persist in suitable microclimate, habitat fragmentation or non‐availability of preferred food plants can impair their ability to cope with the changing environment and pose a threat to their survival and fitness (Bhattacharyya, Dawson, Hipperson, & Ishtiaq, 2018; Ray, Beever, & Loarie, 2012; Schloss, Nuñez, & Lawler, 2012; Walther et al., 2002).

The Royle's pika (Ochotona roylei) is a widespread small herbivore, occupying much of the Himalayan arc—from northwestern Pakistan to India (Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand), Nepal, and adjacent Tibet (Bhattacharyya & Smith, 2018) and inhabits rocky boulder or talus habitat between 2,400 and 5,200 m elevation. It is an asocial mammal (Bhattacharyya & Smith, 2018, Figure 1) and, unlike other talus‐dwelling pika species (e.g., American pika Ochotona princeps, Collared pika Ochotona collaris), does not exhibit haying activity to store winter food resources (Bhattacharyya, Adhikari, & Rawat, 2013). The Royle's pika usually occurs at low population densities from 12.5 per ha in Nepal to 16.2 per ha in the western Himalaya in India (Bhattacharyya, Adhikari, & Rawat, 2014a). Furthermore, the interannual variation in population density of the Royle's pika is often influenced by snow melting pattern, food availability, and refuge from predation risk (rock cover) (Bhattacharyya et al., 2014a). The Royle's pika is sensitive to high temperatures (>15°C) that lead to thermal stress and limit overall activity (Bhattacharyya, Adhikari, & Rawat, 2014b). Furthermore, the Royle's pika play a crucial role in trophic interactions in alpine habitat—pikas are the major prey base for many carnivores as well as influencing native plant community structure (Aryal, Sathyakumar, & Kreigenhofer, 2010; Bhattacharyya et al., 2013, 2018 ; Bhattacharyya, Dutta, Adhikari, & Rawat, 2015)—their disappearance can have a significant negative cascading effect on overall ecosystem functioning (Gilg, Sittler, & Hanski, 2009; Tylianakis, Didham, Bascompte, & Wardle, 2008).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Royle's pika (a) and its talus habitat (b) in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Photograph credit: Sabuj Bhattacharyya

The population genetic structure of small mammals is often influenced by landscape features and habitat fragmentation (Gerlach & Musolf, 2000; Peacock & Smith, 1997a; Peakall, Ruibal, & Lindenmayer, 2003). For talus‐dwelling species, topographical features (e.g., aspect) and alpine habitat connectivity play a crucial role in determining increased gene flow (e.g., American pikas; Castillo, Epps, Davis, & Cushman, 2014). Similarly, microhabitat characteristics such as rock cover area, availability of rock talus with small crevice size (<15 cm), govern the habitat occupancy in Royle's pika (Bhattacharyya et al., 2015). A large area of talus supports greater plant diversity and results in higher species richness in the pika's diet (Bhattacharyya et al., 2018). Therefore, we expect that Royle's pika populations would be influenced by topographical barriers (e.g., river low land valleys) as well as forage availability (e.g., C3 plants).

Philopatric settlements (dispersal very close to their natal territory) in pikas often lead to incestuous matings and low intrapopulation genetic variability (Henry, Sim, & Russello, 2012; Peacock & Smith, 1997a, 1997b ; Smith & Weston, 1990). While we lack information on sex‐biased dispersal or philopatry in Royle's pika, being a rocky talus obligate species, Royle's pika could have high inbreeding coefficients and relatedness across spatially close talus habitats or signatures of historical connectivity in habitat.

Population dynamics of Royle's pika are often influenced by snow melting pattern as snow acts as a thermal insulator to pika and their food plants (Bhattacharyya et al., 2014a). With recent (1982–2006) changes in snow patterns and rising temperatures in winters in the Himalaya region (Shrestha et al., 2012), these could result in patchy distribution of pika, loss of genetic diversity, and a demographic bottleneck in the species (Bhattacharyya et al., 2014a).

In the Himalayan arc, seven Ochotona species have been reported (Smith, Formozov, Hoffmann, Changlin, & Erbajeva, 1990); however, detailed long‐term studies on pika ecology (see Bhattacharyya et al., 2013; Bhattacharyya et al., 2014a; Bhattacharyya et al., 2014b; Bhattacharyya et al., 2015) and population genetics are yet to be considered. A fine‐scale pattern of distribution and habitat selection of the Royle's pika has been studied in the western Himalaya for the past nine years (Bhattacharyya et al., 2013, 2014a, 2014b, 2015 ). Using genetic markers in combination with fine‐scale spatial ecological data provides a unique opportunity to explore the genetic structure, patterns of relatedness, and demographic responses to changing environment. We employed a panel of seven polymorphic markers (see Table 1 for details) to understand the population structure and gene flow in the Royle's pika in the western Himalaya. We estimated genetic diversity between and within populations and explored evidence of inbreeding, isolation by distance, population genetic bottleneck, all of which will provide insights on how shifting environmental conditions can influence species distribution, overall fitness, and adaptive evolutionary potential in the face of climate change.

Table 1.

Genetic diversity in Royle's pika populations in the western Himalaya

Locia A AL H O H E PIC NF T m Reference
Ocp6 5 198–212 0.72 0.75 0.71 0.01 58 Peacock et al., 2002
Ocp16 4 113–127 0.43 0.48 0.4 0.04 58 Castillo et al., 2014
P7 8 144–176 0.68 0.84 0.82 0.09 62 Li et al., 2009
STR14 11 112–182 0.64 0.86 0.85 0.14 TD Alves et al., 2015
SAT4 5 142–222 0.7 0.78 0.75 0.05 TD Mougel et al., 1997
SAT3 6 120–186 0.7 0.77 0.74 0.05 TD Mougel et al., 1997
STR31* 6 124–184 0.7 0.79 0.79 0.05 TD Alves et al., 2015

A: mean number of alleles; AL: allele range in base pairs; H E: expected heterozygosity; H O: observed heterozygosity; NF: null allele frequency; PIC: polymorphism information content; TD: touchdown PCR; T m: annealing temperature in PCR.

a

A panel of 64 microsatellite loci was selected for initial genotyping from following studies; American pika (Ochotona princeps, n = 25; Castillo et al., 2014; Peacock et al., 2002), Plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae, n = 6; Li et al., 2009), Collared pika (Ochotona collaris, n = 5; Zgurski et al., 2009) as well as other lagomorph species such as European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus, n = 28; Alves et al., 2015; Mougel et al., 1997) and a final set of seven polymorphic loci were selected based on amplification success rate across all populations.

*Significant deviation from HW equilibrium, p < 0.05.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Field sampling

The Royle's pika is usually found in talus habitats around forest trails with a home range of approximately 50 m2 (Bhattacharyya et al., 2015; Kawamichi, 1968). We surveyed talus habitats using noninvasive fecal sampling across five locations spanning an elevational gradient (2,600–4,450 m above sea level): Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary (Chopta–Tungnath [TUN], n = 105; Rudranath [RUD], n = 10; Madmaheshwar [MAD], n = 17), Govind Wildlife Sanctuary (Har ki Doon [HAR] n = 22), Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (Bedni‐Roopkund [NAN], n = 69) in Garhwal region, Uttarakhand, India (Figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Location of Royle's pika talus sampled for fecal pellets in Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India. Inset map showing distribution range of Royle's pika across Himalayan arc, black dots represent presence locations, red triangles represent sampled locations. (b) The scatterplot showing first two components of the discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) using pika locations (K = 5) as prior clusters. Each pika sampling location in DAPC was indicated by colored inertia ellipses and dots represent individuals. The first principal component PC I (abscissa) explains 50.21%, whereas the second principal component PC II (ordinate) explains 28.35% of the total genetic variance. (c) Isolation‐by‐distance analysis among individuals across sampled locations. Each color represents comparison within and across locations

Fecal pellets were collected in two seasons: postmonsoon (late October–mid‐November 2014), and premonsoon (late May–June 2015). The talus size varies between 10 and 200 m2 and a 50 m2 plot was laid in each talus, which was thoroughly searched for fecal pellets. In order to maximize our chances of sampling different individuals, samples were collected from fecal piles at 50 m distance within a talus. Fresh fecal pellets (moist, dark brown/black in color) were collected in airtight plastic tubes with silica gel and were labeled with name of sampling location and geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude). We analyzed spatial data using the R package “geosphere” (Hijmans, Williams, & Vennes, 2015) and estimated distance between talus and sample locations (Figure 2a).

2.2. Molecular methods

The Royle's pika often feeds on plants with high levels of secondary metabolites (Bhattacharyya et al., 2013, 2018 ). The presence of plant secondary metabolites in fecal pellets can hamper downstream genetic analysis by inhibiting enzymatic reactions in polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Weishing, Nybom, Wolff, & Meyer, 1995). Therefore, we used QiaAmp DNA stool kit (Qiagen Inc.) for DNA extractions from fecal pellets following minor modifications in the manufacturer's protocol (e.g., overnight incubation at 56°C with ASL buffer).

We used 64 nuclear microsatellite loci which have previously been used in population genetic studies of other lagomorph species (e.g., the European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, Mougel, Mounolou, & Monnerot, 1997) and for other pika species (e.g., the American pika, Peacock, Kirchoff, & Merideth, 2002, Castillo et al., 2014; the Plateau pika Ochotona curzoniae, Li, Geng, Yang, Zhang, & Hu, 2009; and the Collared pika Zgurski, Davis, & Hik, 2009). Of these loci, seven polymorphic loci were retained to genotype samples, as mentioned in Table 1. We used Qiagen multiplex PCR kit and followed published protocols (Alves et al., 2015; Castillo et al., 2014; Li et al., 2009; Mougel et al., 1997; Peacock et al., 2002; Zgurski et al., 2009; see Table 1). The forward sequences of each primer were labeled with fluorescent dyes (FAM, NED, VIC, PET). The markers were multiplexed after the PCR amplification stage, as annealing temperature varied across loci. Each sample for each locus was amplified a minimum of four times to control for allelic dropout. Amplified products were diluted and run on an ABI 3730 automated sequencer and analyzed in GENEIOUS version 9.0.4 ( https://www.geneious.com/).

2.3. Data analyses

2.3.1. Estimation of genetic diversity

The presence and frequency of null alleles and polymorphism information content (PIC) that indicate microsatellite primer's informativeness, mean number of alleles per locus (A), observed heterozygosity (H O), and expected heterozygosity (H E) were determined using CERVUS version 2.0 (Marshall, Slate, Kruuk, & Pemberton, 1998). We used Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test to check whether the H O and H E varied significantly across loci and sampled locations. To avoid analyzing multiple genotypes from the same individual in our final genotypic dataset, we assigned all samples to unique individuals using probability of identity statistics (PID; Paetkau et al., 1998) in CERVUS version 2.0. Any sample, which showed similarity at five loci, was considered a duplicate sample and was removed from the final dataset (see Cullingham et al., 2016). All loci were tested for departures from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using CERVUS version 2.0 and used Holm's Bonferroni sequential corrections to adjust p values in HWE estimations (Gaetano, 2013). We tested for linkage disequilibrium using GENEPOP version 4.6 (Raymond, 1995; Rousset, 2008). We estimated likelihood of allelic dropout rate and false allele rate within each population with 10,000 search steps (Johnson & Haydon, 2007), using PEDANT version 1.0.

We used ESTIMATES version 9.0 with 10,000 iterations (Colwell et al., 2012) and the nonparametric Chao2 estimator (mean ± SD; Colwell & Coddington, 1994) to estimate our success in sampling alleles in populations (with more than 13 samples). We constructed rarefaction curves plotting the cumulative number of alleles found with increasing sample size.

Genetic divergence across populations (F ST) (Holsinger & Weir, 2009) and the inbreeding coefficient (F IS) (Weir & Cockerham, 1984) per population were estimated using ARLEQUIN version 3.5 (Excoffier & Lischer, 2010).

2.3.2. Spatial autocorrelation

We examined the relationship between genetic relatedness and geographic distance using Wang's estimator “r” (Wang, 2002) in SPAGeDi version 1.4 (Hardy & Vekemans, 2002). This estimator is preferable among all relatedness indices due to its low sensitivity to sampling error in allele frequency calculation and has low sampling variance due to change in number of loci or alleles (Blouin 2003; Robinson, Simmons, & Kennington, 2013, Wang, 2017). The program estimates pairwise relatedness among each pair of individual pikas and regresses against pairwise straight‐line distance between them. In this study, the relatedness coefficients (Wang's estimator) were calculated against a range of distance classes (0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 and >125 km). These classes were chosen to incorporate comparisons in local scale (0.1 km) as well as total spatial distance (>125 km) and to ensure minimum 100 individual pairwise comparisons per distance class to keep sample size large enough for robust statistical analysis (Hardy & Vekemans, 2002). The standard error for each distance class was estimated using a jackknife procedure over loci (Hardy & Vekemans, 2002), and deviation of Wang's estimate (r) from 0 suggests that Royle's pika individuals within a specific distance class are significantly related (positive values = high relatedness, negative values = low relatedness) and not random.

2.3.3. Genetic differentiation in pika populations

We used five different methods to assess the population structure and differentiation in Royle's pika. The first two methods used a clustering approach: STRUCTURE and the discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) and three methods were based on distances: F ST estimations, the analysis of the molecular variance (AMOVA), and isolation by distance (IBD). We included one locus that showed HWE deviation as the deviation was not observed in all populations.

We first investigated the likelihood of each individual sample belonging to one of several clusters (K) based on allele frequencies, using Bayesian clustering methodology in STRUCTURE version 2.3.4 (Pritchard, Stephens, & Donnelly, 2000). We implemented the admixture ancestry model with correlated allele frequencies. The putative numbers of population clusters (K) were allowed to vary from one to 10 with 50,000 burn‐in iterations and 500,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations (Ishtiaq, Prakash, Green, & Johnson, 2015; Singh et al., 2017). A total of 20 independent runs were performed for each K (1–10) to achieve consistency across the runs. We used Structure Harvester (Earl & VonHoldt, 2012) to calculate Delta K (Evanno, Regnaut, & Goudet, 2005) in order to infer the optimal number of clusters. We used the program CLUMPAK ( https://clumpak.tau.ac.il/) to visualize the STRUCTURE results (the optimum number of populations, as estimated by the log likelihood and Delta K). STRUCTURE results often fail to detect fine‐scale hierarchical population structure (Janes et al., 2017). Therefore, we used a complementary multivariate analysis—discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC; Jombart, Devillard, & Balloux, 2010) to detect complex spatial as well as hierarchical genetic structure across populations (Evanno et al., 2005; Jombart et al., 2010; Vergara et al., 2015). DAPC do not require the populations to fulfill common assumptions of traditional genetic models such as maintaining HWE or linkage equilibrium (LE) between loci (Jombart, 2008; Jombart et al., 2010). Thus, this multivariate analysis is often used as a robust tool to validate the inferences of individual Bayesian clustering software such as STRUCTURE.

We performed DAPC with the R package “Adegenet” (Jombart, 2008). DAPC define clusters using clustering algorithms K‐means on transformed data with principal component analysis (PCA). The clustering identifies groups of populations with similar genotypes by specifying the actual number of clusters (K = 5) as a priori information (Putman & Carbone, 2014; Zachos et al., 2016). We retained 32 principal components of PCA, which explained approximately 90% of the total variation of our dataset. We used q > 0.7 to assign individuals to each location.

We used AMOVA to determine hierarchical distribution of genetic variation in ARLEQUIN. To run this analysis, we a priori defined five groups according to sampling sites and talus sampled within these sites. The significance of AMOVA was tested using 1,000 replicate bootstrap of all data.

To determine spatial patterns driving genetic differentiation among locations, linearized pairwise F ST among talus (F ST/(1−F ST) obtained for seven microsatellite loci were correlated against log‐transformed geographic distances between talus using a Mantel test with 1,000 permutations in ARLEQUIN.

2.3.4. Demographic effects of environmental conditions and habitat (bottleneck)

The detection of evidence for any population bottleneck was primarily based on Wilcoxon's signed rank test and shift in allelic distribution (Luikart, Allendorf, Cornuet, & Sherwin, 1998). We selected locations (TUN, MAD, and NAN) with sample size >10 individuals. We used BOTTLENECK version 1.2.02 to assess the genetic signature of demographic contractions using the heterozygote excess test (Cornuet & Luikart, 1996; Piry, Luikart, & Cornuet, 1999). The heterozygote excess test determines whether sudden decline in population size has led to the loss of rare alleles which can cause an expected heterozygosity excess (Luikart, Allendorf, et al., 1998; Luikart, Sherwin, Steele, & Allendorf, 1998; Nei, Maruyama, & Chakraborty, 1975). Evidence of a recent bottleneck in a population could be indicated by an increase in the number of heterozygotes relative to the number of alleles, whereas heterozygote deficiency indicates population growth (Cornuet & Luikart, 1996). Six out of seven microsatellite primers used in the study were dinucleotide. Hence, a two‐phase mutational model (TPM) with 95% single step mutations (SMM) and 12% variance among mutational steps, and 1,000 simulations for each location were used, which is generally recommended practice for dinucleotide microsatellite repeat loci (Di Rienzo et al., 1994; Piry et al., 1999).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Genetic diversity

A total of 203 fecal samples were collected from five locations. Of these samples, 68.96% were successfully amplified and produced consistent results across all replicates (Supporting Information Table S1). The average missing data across all loci were 2.95%, ranging from 0.71% (SAT3) to 7.14% (Ocp6). The rarefaction curve for allelic richness for each microsatellite locus indicated that we were able to detect all possible alleles across sampled populations (Supporting Information Table S2). No significant linkage disequilibrium was detected for any locus, whereas deviation from HW equilibrium was detected only in one out of seven loci in RUD and HAK populations after Bonferroni correction (Table 1). We retained all loci for further analysis as no systematic deviation of HWE was observed across all sites.

The observed allelic dropout rate (0.00–0.09) and false allele rate (0.00–0.07) were not significant for any locus. Null alleles were not detected in any population. The mean number of alleles per locus across all populations was 8.42. The mean polymorphism information content (PIC) was high (0.72) and varied from 0.40 to 0.85 indicating that loci were informative in detecting high levels of allelic polymorphism among genotyped individuals. (Table 1). The average expected heterozygosity across seven loci was 0.68, whereas mean observed heterozygosity was 0.57 (Table 2) and varied significantly across loci (Kruskal–Wallis chi‐squared = 5.58, df = 1, p < 0.01) and locations (Kruskal–Wallis chi‐squared = 6.091, df = 1, p < 0.01). The mean inbreeding coefficient (F IS) was 0.13 and varied from 0.01 to 0.50 across populations (Table 2).

Table 2.

Genetic diversity across Royle's pika in the western Himalaya

Location T a n N A H O H E F IS
HAK 14 6 2.71 0.33(0.09) 0.65(0.09) 0.50
MAD 7 13 4 0.61(0.09) 0.70(0.14) 0.08
TUN 56 79 5.71 0.67(0.11) 0.74(0.15) 0.08
RUD 5 7 3.57 0.63(0.19) 0.64(0.10) 0.01
NAN 22 35 4.85 0.65(0.11) 0.69(0.09) 0.04
Royles’ pika (this study) 140 7 4.16 0.57 0.68 0.13
American pikab 168 10 16.8 0.47 0.58 0.20
Collared pikac 442 15 5.8 0.61 0.62 0.03

A: mean number of alleles; F IS: mean inbreeding coefficient; H E: mean expected heterozygosity; H O: mean observed heterozygosity; N: number of loci used; n: number of samples successfully genotyped; T: total number of talus sampled during this study.

Standard deviation in parenthesis; location codes are the same as Figure 1

a

Details of talus surveyed mentioned in Table S1

b

Henry et al., 2012.

c

Zgurski & Hik, 2014.

3.2. Spatial autocorrelation

The pairwise relatedness analysis suggested local‐scale genetic structure in pika populations. The negative regression slope (b = −0.22 ± 0.005, p < 0.05) between Wang's estimator (r) and geographic distance suggested neighboring individuals within 1 km distance are more genetically related than any random pair of individuals (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Average relatedness (Wang's r) between pairs of Royle's pika individuals in relation to their geographic proximity. The approximate standard errors obtained through jackknifing over loci are plotted as error bars

3.3. Genetic differentiation in pika populations

The STRUCTURE results suggested a best fit of K = 2 clusters. The maximum Delta was found at K = 2, followed by K = 3 (Figure 4a,b). A large proportion of individuals (80%) were successfully assigned (q > 0.7) at K = 2 (Supporting Information Table S3), whereas at K = 3.5%, a large proportion of individuals were assigned (q > 0.7) to specific clusters. In K = 2, individuals in NAN (97%) and HAK (83.34%) were assigned in genetic cluster “A” and MAD (38.46%), TUN (69%), and RUD (57.14%) were assigned in cluster “B” (Figure 4c, Supporting Information Table S3). The DAPC suggested K = 3 as the most probable number of clusters which indicated genetic differentiation in HAK as a distinct cluster, whereas NAN, MAD, TUN, and RUD either partially or completely overlapped (Figure 2b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Nonspatial Bayesian individual‐based clustering STRUCTURE results from seven polymorphic microsatellite loci and admixture model. Plots showing the modal value of best K using maximum likelihood method (mean L (K) ± SD; a) and using ΔK method (b), the maximum Delta K = 13.70 was found at K = 2, followed by K = 3 with a Delta K = 5.12; visualization of the Bayesian clustering analysis implemented in STRUCTURE for K = 2–K = 6 (c) where each K is shown as a different color. Individuals are shown as single vertical bars, grouped by geographic location; location codes (below the plot) are the same as Figure 1. Data shown are aggregated data from 20 independent runs

The AMOVA suggested that a majority of the genetic variance was attributed to variation within individuals (84.45%), followed by 6.05% of the variation among locations, and 6.84% variation among talus within each location (Table 3). TUN and MAD were the only two locations with significantly low genetic differentiation (F ST = 0.02, p < 0.01, Table 4), whereas other paired locations showed significantly high genetic differentiation (F ST = 0.04−0.16, p < 0.01, Table 4).

Table 3.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for five sampled locations of Royle's pika

Source of variation df Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation p Value
Among locations 4 33.22 0.13 6.05 <0.001
Among talus within locations 65 168.85 0.15 6.84 <0.001
Among individuals within talus 70 308.33 0.05 2.65 0.27
Within individuals 140 262.5 1.87 84.45 <0.001

df: degrees of freedom.

Significance tests were based on 1,000 permutations.

Table 4.

Matrix of pairwise F ST estimates (below diagonal) and their significance level (P value below 0.01*, 0.001**; above diagonal) across sampled locations of Royle’s pika in the western Himalaya

Location HAK MAD TUN RUD NAN
HAK ** ** ** **
MAD 0.13 ** * **
TUN 0.13 0.02 ** **
RUD 0.19 0.04 0.04 **
NAN 0.12 0.04 0.06 0.07

Population codes are the same as Figure 1a.

The Mantel test showed significant evidence for a decrease in genetic differentiation across sampled individuals with an increase in geographic distance (r = 0.033, p < 0.001; Figure 2c).

3.4. Demographic change (bottleneck) in pika populations

We found significant (p < 0.05) heterozygosity excess across three locations suggesting that demographic change leads to a recent bottleneck (Table 5).

Table 5.

Wilcoxon sign‐rank test and change in allelic distribution to detect heterozygosity excess due to significant reduction in Royle's pika population in the western Himalaya

Location Wilcoxon's signed rank test probability Allele frequency distribution
TPM SSM
MAD p = 0.003 p = 0.003 Shifted mode
TUN p = 0.003 p = 0.003 Shifted mode
NAN p = 0.03 p = 0.07 Shifted mode

IAM: infinite alleles model; p = probability of significant heterozygosity excess; SMM: stepwise mutation model.

Location codes are the same as Figure 1a.

4. DISCUSSION

In this first genetic study on the Royle pika in south Asia, we used a noninvasive sampling approach where the quality of samples often relies on environmental conditions (Lucchini et al., 2002; Murphy, Kendall, Robinson, & Waits, 2007), sample preservation method (Nsubuga et al., 2004), and diet of model species (Panasci et al., 2011). Royle's pika occurs in open rocky talus habitat where fecal pellets were often exposed to high temperature fluctuation, high UV radiation, and extreme weather conditions, all of which could potentially degrade the DNA quality. Despite these constraints, we were able to successfully genotype large number (68.96%) of samples which showed high PIC value, low allelic dropout, and false allele rates to establish accuracy and reliability in our dataset.

4.1. Genetic variation and population structure in Royle's pika

Overall, the Royle's pika populations exhibited similar levels of genetic diversity (0.57) to those observed in other studies on talus‐dwelling Ochotona species (see Table 2). However, our genetic diversity values are not directly comparable as we used relatively fewer genetic markers than other studies. Nonetheless, the observed patterns in our data reflect pika life‐history traits rather than data quality. Natural populations with small numbers of individuals often lose genetic variability due to genetic drift and inbreeding (Lacy, 1997). The Royle's pika has a small litter size (Bhattacharyya et al., 2014a) and occurs at low density (16.2 individuals per ha). While there is no information on the extent of philopatry, our results indicate the possibility of inbreeding and a philopatric mode of dispersal with low inbreeding coefficients (F IS) and high level of pairwise relatedness in populations within 1 km. For a mainland mammal with broad geographic distribution, American pika showed similar patterns with low estimates of heterozygosity, low population density (around 10 individuals per ha) with high philopatry that suggest life‐history characteristics result in high within‐site inbreeding coefficients (Glover, Smith, Ames, Joule, & Dubach, 1977; Henry et al., 2012; Moilanen, Smith, & Hanski, 1998; Peacock, 1997; Peacock & Smith, 1997a; Smith & Ivins, 1983). The Royle's pika populations showed high genetic variation within individuals. Distribution of genetic diversity within and among populations is often found to be influenced by migration of individuals (Berthier, Charbonnel, Galan, Chaval, & Cosson, 2006; Hartl & Clark, 1997). Hence, populations with restricted movement and gene flow usually exhibit high genetic differentiation (Peery et al., 2008; Slarkin, 1985). The pairwise F ST estimates across geographically closer locations (e.g., MAD and TUN or TUN and RUD; 8–13 km) indicated comparatively low genetic differentiation, suggesting more gene flow in recent times. This is in contrast to the pattern observed in the two geographically distant populations (HAK and NAN: 42–160 km), which showed moderate to very high genetic differentiation—so suggesting low gene flow (pairwise F ST = 0.04–0.19). Furthermore, isolated mountain valley (cradle shaped) and absence of potential talus habitat near HAK location, which possibly reduces the gene flow from other pika populations, lead to high inbreeding coefficient. The genetic similarities within Royle's pika populations could be attributed to the following factors: (i) patchy distribution of talus habitat with suitable crevices (Bhattacharyya et al., 2015); (ii) preference toward endemic food plants with limited distribution range (Bhattacharyya et al., 2018); (iii) limited distribution of rock cover to protect from heat stress and predation risk (Bhattacharyya et al., 2014b); (iv) high interannual variation in the snow melting pattern, resulting in low survival and pika abundance (Bhattacharyya et al., 2014a).

Across two cluster approaches, DAPC results were in congruence with F ST estimates due to limitation of STRUCTURE for detecting fine‐scale genetic structure (Janes et al, 2017). Landscape features and topography (e.g., elevation, aspect), habitat availability, and temperature gradient are factors which influence pika dispersal and connectivity between metapopulations over 10 km apart (Castillo et al., 2014, 2016 ; Henry et al., 2012; Robson, Lamb, & Russello, 2015; Smith, 1974). Royle's pika talus habitat is fragmented and cannot traverse physical barriers like wide valleys and river beds (e.g., Bhagirathi and Mandakini rivers form a barrier for HAK from other locations), which act as semipermeable barriers for dispersal and restrict distribution.

4.2. Effects of habitat and snow patterns on demography (population bottleneck)

We found evidence of a recent bottleneck, which is possibly a result of significant recent changes in habitat structure and rising winter temperature. The distribution and depth of snow in mountain regions are often influenced by wind and topography (e.g., aspect, slope), and microclimate, causing significant variation in snow cover, even across small geographical distances (Deems, Birkeland, & Hansen, 2002; Gurung et al., 2017). Royle's pika does not hibernate during winter and snow cover acts as a thermal insulator against extreme cold and fluctuating temperatures (Bhattacharyya et al., 2014a). While warm winters with thin snow cover can cause severe mortality in adult pikas, thin snow cover during the spring reduces reproductive fitness and thereby delays breeding dates (Bhattacharyya et al., 2014a; Morrison & Hik, 2007). In Royle's pika, talus size (area) and connectivity between talus are known to influence the habitat occupancy, whereas predation risk significantly impacts foraging ecology (Bhattacharyya et al., 2013, 2018, 2015 ) and potentially also access to nutritive plants, thereby affecting individual fitness. Furthermore, the decreased precipitation (3–4 mm per year from 1982 to 2006; Shrestha et al., 2012) during spring affects the growth rates of nutritive C3 plants in summer, which form the main diet of young pika (Bhattacharyya et al., 2018). Climate‐induced habitat loss and range contractions might be the main drivers for the apparent population bottleneck in pika. Contemporary climate change is expected to significantly affect the distribution and population dynamics in this talus‐dwelling species.

5. CONCLUSIONS

This is the first genetic study to establish the population structure of an important lagomorph species in the western Himalaya. Using clustering approaches, we found evidence for well‐defined population structure. We detected moderate levels of inbreeding and evidence for a recent population bottleneck and genetic isolation by geographic distance. We found little evidence of gene flow was observed between individuals >1 km apart. Therefore, being a climate‐sensitive small mammal which lives in isolated patches of mountain habitat and having limited dispersal ability, Royle's pika may depend on local adaptation in order to survive changing environmental conditions in the future. Our study highlights the need for an in‐depth study of this high‐altitude‐restricted model species and presents new evidence that it is imminently threatened by climate change.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

The field experiments comply with the current laws of India where the study was performed. We thank Uttarakhand Forest Department for ethical approval and permission for collection of fecal samples.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

FI and SB designed the experiment. SB conducted the field and laboratory experiments. SB and FI analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

The GPS locations of all sample collection points have already been added in Supporting Information. The microsatellite genotype data(allele frequency table) generated during the study has been submitted in the Dryad database (Provisional DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.83jm680).

Supporting information

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Uttarakhand State Forest Department for permission to collect fecal samples. SB is supported by Department of Biotechnology (DBT) Research Associateship and Pro‐Natura Foundation grant, Japan. FI is supported by a Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance Fellowship. We would like to thank Dr. M. Carneiro, University of Porto, Dr. J. Castillo, Oregon State University, Ms. V. Kirchoff, University of Nevada for providing microsatellite primers for standardization of genotyping protocols. We also thank Dr. T. Kawamichi, Dr. C. Ray, and Dr. M.M. Peacock for help and support during the study. Mr. Rahul De, Mr. Chandan Pandey, Dr. V. Kollipakam, Dr. M. Kaushik, and Dr. D. Dawson helped with SPAGeDi, DAPC, CERVUS, and R. We would like to thank three reviewers for constructive comments that improved the manuscript.

Bhattacharyya S, Ishtiaq F. Noninvasive sampling reveals population genetic structure in the Royle’s pika, Ochotona roylei, in the western Himalaya. Ecol Evol. 2019;9:180–191. 10.1002/ece3.4707

Funding information

This study was partially funded by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) Research Associateship and Pro‐Natura Foundation grant to SB and Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance Fellowship (IA/I(S)/12/2/500629) to FI.

REFERENCES

  1. Alves, J. M. , Carneiro, M. , Afonso, S. , Lopes, S. , Garreau, H. , Boucher, S. , … Ferrand, N. (2015). Levels and patterns of genetic diversity and population structure in domestic rabbits. PLoS One, 10(12), e0144687 10.1371/journal.pone.0144687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aryal, A. , Sathyakumar, S. , & Kreigenhofer, B. (2010). Opportunistic animals diet depend on prey availability: Spring dietary composition of the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment, 2(4), 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beever, E. A. , Brussard, P. F. , & Berger, J. (2003). Patterns of apparent extirpation among isolated populations of pikas (Ochotona princeps) in the Great Basin. Journal of Mammalogy, 84(1), 3754. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berthier, K. , Charbonnel, N. , Galan, M. , Chaval, Y. , & Cosson, J. F. (2006). Migration and recovery of the genetic diversity during the increasing density phase in cyclic vole populations. Molecular Ecology, 15(9), 2665–2676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhattacharyya, S. , Adhikari, B. S. , & Rawat, G. S. (2013). Forage selection by Royle's pika (Ochotona roylei) in the western Himalaya, India. Zoology, 116(5), 300–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhattacharyya, S. , Adhikari, B. S. , & Rawat, G. S. (2014a). Influence of snow, food, and rock cover on Royle's pika abundance in western Himalaya. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 46(3), 558–567. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhattacharyya, S. , Adhikari, B. S. , & Rawat, G. S. (2014b). Influence of microclimate on the activity of Royle's pika in the western Himalaya, India. Zoological Studies, 53(1), 73. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhattacharyya, S. , Dawson, D. , Hipperson, H. , & Ishtiaq, F. (2018). A diet rich in C3 plants reveals the sensitivity of an alpine mammal to climate change. Molecular Ecology. 10.1111/mec.14842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhattacharyya, S. , Dutta, S. , Adhikari, B. S. , & Rawat, G. S. (2015). Presence of a small mammalian prey species in open habitat is dependent on refuge availability. Mammal Research, 60(4), 293–300. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhattacharyya, S. , & Smith, A. T. (2018). Species account: Ochotona roylei In Smith A. T., Johnston C., Alves P., & Hacklender K. (Eds.), Lagomoprhs: Pikas, rabbits, and hares of the world (pp. 75–76). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Blouin, M. S. (2003). DNA‐based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(10), 503–511. [Google Scholar]
  12. Castillo, J. A. , Epps, C. W. , Davis, A. R. , & Cushman, S. A. (2014). Landscape effects on gene flow for a climate sensitive montane species, the American pika. Molecular Ecology, 23(4), 843–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Castillo, J. A. , Epps, C. W. , Jeffress, M. R. , Ray, C. , Rodhouse, T. J. , & Schwalm, D. (2016). Replicated landscape genetic and network analyses reveal wide variation in functional connectivity for American pikas. Ecological Applications, 26(6), 1660–1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Colwell, R. K. , Chao, A. , Gotelli, N. J. , Lin, S. Y. , Mao, C. X. , Chazdon, R. L. , & Longino, J. T. (2012). Models and estimators linking individual‐based and sample‐based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. Journal of Plant Ecology, 5(1), 321. [Google Scholar]
  15. Colwell, R. K. , & Coddington, J. A. (1994). Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 345(1311), 101–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cornuet, J. M. , & Luikart, G. (1996). Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics, 144(4), 2001–2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cullingham, C. I. , Thiessen, C. D. , Derocher, A. E. , Paquet, P. C. , Miller, J. M. , Hamilton, J. A. , & Coltman, D. W. (2016). Population structure and dispersal of wolves in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Journal of Mammalogy, 97(3), 839–851. [Google Scholar]
  18. Deems, J. S. , Birkeland, K. W. , & Hansen, K. J. (2002). Topographic influence on the spatial patterns of snow temperature gradients in a mountain snowpack. In: Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, Penticton, BC, pp. 384–391.
  19. Di Rienzo, A. , Peterson, A. C. , Garza, J. C. , Valdes, A. M. , Slatkin, M. , & Freimer, N. B. (1994). Mutational processes of simple‐sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91(8), 3166–3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Earl, D. A. , & Vonholdt, B. M. (2012). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4(2), 359–361. 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Evanno, G. , Regnaut, S. , & Goudet, J. (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14(8), 2611–2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Excoffier, L. , & Lischer, H. E. L. (2010). Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10(3), 564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gaetano, J. (2013). Holm Bonferroni sequential correction: An EXCEL calculator [Microsoft Excel workbook]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236969037_Holm-Bonferroni_Sequential_Correction_An_EXCEL_Calculator
  24. Gerlach, G. , & Musolf, K. (2000). Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision in bank voles. Conservation Biology, 14(4), 1066–1074. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gilg, O. , Sittler, B. , & Hanski, I. (2009). Climate change and cyclic predator–prey population dynamics in the high Arctic. Global Change Biology, 15(11), 2634–2652. [Google Scholar]
  26. Glover, D. G. , Smith, M. H. , Ames, L. , Joule, J. , & Dubach, J. M. (1977). Genetic variation in pika populations. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 55(11), 1841–1845. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gurung, D. R. , Maharjan, S. B. , Shrestha, A. B. , Shrestha, M. S. , Bajracharya, S. R. , & Murthy, M. S. R. (2017). Climate and topographic controls on snow cover dynamics in the Hindu Kush Himalaya. International Journal of Climatology, 37(10), 3873–3882. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hardy, O. J. , & Vekemans, X. (2002). SPAGeDi: A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2(4), 618–620. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hartl, D. L. , & Clark, A. G. (1997). Principles of population genetics (pp. 545; Vol. 116). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
  30. Henry, P. , Sim, Z. , & Russello, M. A. (2012). Genetic evidence for restricted dispersal along continuous altitudinal gradients in a climate change‐sensitive mammal: The American pika. Plos One, 7(6), e39077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hijmans, R. J. , Williams, E. , & Vennes, C. (2015). Geosphere: Spherical trigonometry. R package version 1.3‐11. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere
  32. Holsinger, K. E. , & Weir, B. S. (2009). Genetics in geographically structured populations: Defining, estimating and interpreting FST. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(9), 639–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ishtiaq, F. , Prakash, V. , Green, R. E. , & Johnson, J. (2015). Management implications of genetic studies for ex situ populations of three critically endangered Asian Gyps vultures. Animal Conservation, 18(3), 259–270. [Google Scholar]
  34. Janes, J. K. , Miller, J. M. , Dupuis, J. R. , Malenfant, R. M. , Gorrell, J. C. , Cullingham, C. I. , & Andrew, R. L. (2017). The K= 2 conundrum. Molecular Ecology, 26, 3594–3602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnson, P. C. , & Haydon, D. T. (2007). Maximum‐likelihood estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data. Genetics, 175(2), 827–842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jombart, T. (2008). Adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics, 24(11), 1403–1405. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129. PMID: 18397895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jombart, T. , Devillard, S. , & Balloux, F. (2010). Discriminant analysis of principal components: A new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genetics, 11(1), 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kawamichi, T. (1968). Winter behaviour of the Himalayan Pika, Ochotona roylei . Journal of Faculty of Science Hokkaido, Series VI Zoology, 16(4), 582–594. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lacy, R. C. (1997). Importance of genetic variation to the viability of mammalian populations. Journal of Mammalogy, 78(2), 320–355. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, K. X. , Geng, J. N. , Yang, J. , Zhang, Y. M. , & Hu, S. N. (2009). Isolation and characterization of 13 microsatellite loci in the plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae). Conservation Genetics, 10(3), 785–787. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lucchini, V. , Fabbri, E. , Marucco, F. , Ricci, S. , Boitani, L. , & Randi, E. (2002). Noninvasive molecular tracking of colonizing wolf (Canis lupus) packs in the western Italian Alps. Molecular Ecology, 11(5), 857–868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Luikart, G. , Allendorf, F. W. , Cornuet, J. M. , & Sherwin, W. B. (1998). Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. Journal of Heredity, 89(3), 238–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Luikart, G. , Sherwin, W. B. , Steele, B. M. , & Allendorf, F. W. (1998). Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Molecular Ecology, 7(8), 963–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Marshall, T. C. , Slate, J. B. , Kruuk, L. E. , & Pemberton, J. M. (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7(5), 639–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Moilanen, A. , Smith, A. T. , & Hanski, I. (1998). Long‐term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American pika. The American Naturalist, 152(4), 530–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Moritz, C. , Patton, J. L. , Conroy, C. J. , Parra, J. L. , White, G. C. , & Beissinger, S. R. (2008). Impact of a century of climate change on small‐mammal communities in Yosemite National Park. USA. Science, 322(5899), 261–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Morrison, S. F. , & Hik, D. S. (2007). Demographic analysis of a declining pika Ochotona collaris population: Linking survival to broad‐scale climate patterns via spring snowmelt patterns. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76(5), 899–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mougel, F. , Mounolou, J. C. , & Monnerot, M. (1997). Nine polymorphic microsatellite loci in the rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus . Animal Genetics, 28(1), 59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Murphy, M. A. , Kendall, K. C. , Robinson, A. , & Waits, L. P. (2007). The impact of time and field conditions on brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA amplification. Conservation Genetics, 8(5), 1219–1224. [Google Scholar]
  50. Naftz, D. L. , Susong, D. D. , Schuster, P. F. , Cecil, L. D. , Dettinger, M. D. , Michel, R. L. , & Kendall, C. (2002). Ice core evidence of rapid air temperature increases since 1960 in alpine areas of the, Wind River Range, Wyoming, United States. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(D13), 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  51. Nei, M. , Maruyama, T. , & Chakraborty, R. (1975). The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29(1), 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nsubuga, A. M. , Robbins, M. M. , Roeder, A. D. , Morin, P. A. , Boesch, C. , & Vigilant, L. (2004). Factors affecting the amount of genomic DNA extracted from ape faeces and the identification of an improved sample storage method. Molecular Ecology, 13(7), 2089–2094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Paetkau, D. , Waits, L. P. , Clarkson, P. L. , Craighead, L. , Vyse, E. , Ward, R. , & Strobeck, C. (1998). Variation in genetic diversity across the range of North American brown bears. Conservation Biology, 12(2), 418–429. [Google Scholar]
  54. Panasci, M. , Ballard, W. B. , Breck, S. , Rodriguez, D. , Densmore, L. D. , Wester, D. B. , & Baker, R. J. (2011). Evaluation of fecal DNA preservation techniques and effects of sample age and diet on genotyping success. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 75(7), 1616–1624. [Google Scholar]
  55. Peacock, M. M. (1997). Determining natal dispersal patterns in a population of North American pikas (Ochotona princeps) using direct mark‐resight and indirect genetic methods. Behavioral Ecology, 8(3), 340–350. [Google Scholar]
  56. Peacock, M. M. , Kirchoff, V. S. , & Merideth, S. J. (2002). Identification and characterization of nine polymorphic microsatellite loci in the North American pika, Ochotona princeps . Molecular Ecology Resources, 2(3), 360–362. [Google Scholar]
  57. Peacock, M. M. , & Smith, A. T. (1997a). The effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal patterns, mating behavior, and genetic variation in a pika (Ochotona princeps) metapopulation. Oecologia, 112(4), 524–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Peacock, M. M. , & Smith, A. T. (1997b). Nonrandom mating in pikas Ochotona princeps: Evidence for inbreeding between individuals of intermediate relatedness. Molecular Ecology, 6(9), 801–811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Peakall, R. , Ruibal, M. , & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes . Evolution, 57(5), 1182–1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Peery, M. Z. , Beissinger, S. R. , House, R. F. , Berube, M. , Hall, L. A. , Sellas, A. , & Palsbøll, P. J. (2008). Characterizing source–sink dynamics with genetic parentage assignments. Ecology, 89(10), 2746–2759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Piry, S. , Luikart, G. , & Cornuet, J. M. (1999). Computer note. BOTTLENECK: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity, 90(4), 502–503. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pritchard, J. K. , Stephens, M. , & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155(2), 945–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Putman, A. I. , & Carbone, I. (2014). Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies. Ecology and Evolution, 4(22), 4399–4428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Ray, C. , Beever, E. , & Loarie, S. (2012). Retreat of the American pika: Up the mountain or into the void (pp. 245–270). Chicago, IL: Wildlife populations in a changing climate. Univ. of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  65. Raymond, M. (1995). GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248–249. [Google Scholar]
  66. Robinson, S. P. , Simmons, L. W. , & Kennington, W. J. (2013). Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: The effect of demographic history. Molecular Ecology, 22(23), 5779–5792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Robson, K. M. , Lamb, C. T. , & Russello, M. A. (2015). Low genetic diversity, restricted dispersal, and elevation‐specific patterns of population decline in American pikas in an atypical environment. Journal of Mammalogy, 97(2), 464–472. [Google Scholar]
  68. Rousset, F. (2008). GENEPOP’007: A complete re‐implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8(1), 103–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Schloss, C. A. , Nuñez, T. A. , & Lawler, J. J. (2012). Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(22), 8606–8611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Shrestha, U. B. , Gautam, S. , & Bawa, K. S. (2012). Widespread climate change in the Himalayas and associated changes in local ecosystems. Plos One, 7(5), e36741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Singh, S. K. , Aspi, J. , Kvist, L. , Sharma, R. , Pandey, P. , Mishra, S. , … Goyal, S. P. (2017). Fine‐scale population genetic structure of the Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris tigris) in a human‐dominated western Terai Arc Landscape, India. Plos One, 12(4), e0174371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Slarkin, M. (1985). Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16(1), 393–430. 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Smith, A. T. (1974). The distribution and dispersal of pikas: Influences of behavior and climate. Ecology, 55(6), 1368–1376. [Google Scholar]
  74. Smith, A. T. , Formozov, N. A. , Hoffmann, R. S. , Changlin, Z. , & Erbajeva, M. A. (1990). The pikas In Chapman J. A., & Flux J. C. (Eds.), Rabbits, hares and pikas: Status survey and conservation action plan (pp. 14–60). Gland, Switzerland: The World Conservation Union. [Google Scholar]
  75. Smith, A. T. , & Ivins, B. L. (1983). Colonization in a pika population: Dispersal vs. philopatry. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 13(1), 37–47. [Google Scholar]
  76. Smith, A. T. , & Weston, M. L. (1990). Ochotona princeps . Mammalian Species, 352, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tylianakis, J. M. , Didham, R. K. , Bascompte, J. , & Wardle, D. A. (2008). Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 11(12), 1351–1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Vergara, M. , Basto, M. P. , Madeira, M. J. , Gómez‐Moliner, B. J. , Santos‐Reis, M. , Fernandes, C. , & Ruiz‐González, A. (2015). Inferring population genetic structure in widely and continuously distributed carnivores: The stone marten (Martes foina) as a case study. PLoS One, 10(7), e0134257 10.1371/journal.pone.0134257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Walther, G. R. , Post, E. , Convey, P. , Menzel, A. , Parmesan, C. , Beebee, T. J. , … Bairlein, F. (2002). Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416(6879), 389–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang, J. (2002). An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics, 160(3), 1203–1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wang, J. (2017). Estimating pairwise relatedness in a small sample of individuals. Heredity, 119(5), 302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Weir, B. S. , & Cockerham, C. C. (1984). Estimating F‐statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38(6), 1358–1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Weishing, K. , Nybom, H. , Wolff, K. , & Meyer, W. (1995). DNA isolation and purification In Mayer W. (Ed.), DNA fingerprinting in plants and fungi (pp. 44–59). Boca Raton: Florida CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  84. Wilkening, J. L. , Ray, C. , Beever, E. A. , & Brussard, P. F. (2011). Modeling contemporary range retraction in Great Basin pikas (Ochotona princeps) using data on microclimate and microhabitat. Quaternary International, 235(1), 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zachos, F. E. , Frantz, A. C. , Kuehn, R. , Bertouille, S. , Colyn, M. , Niedziałkowska, M. , … Flamand, M. C. (2016). Genetic structure and effective population sizes in European red deer (Cervus elaphus) at a continental scale: Insights from microsatellite DNA. Journal of Heredity, 107(4), 318–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zgurski, J. M. , Davis, C. S. , & Hik, D. S. (2009). Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for the collared pika (Ochotona collaris) and their cross amplification in five other Ochotona species. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9(3), 867–871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zgurski, J. M. , & Hik, D. S. (2014). Gene flow and the restoration of genetic diversity in a fluctuating collared pika (Ochotona collaris) population. Conservation Genetics, 15(1), 37–48. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 

Data Availability Statement

The GPS locations of all sample collection points have already been added in Supporting Information. The microsatellite genotype data(allele frequency table) generated during the study has been submitted in the Dryad database (Provisional DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.83jm680).


Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES