Abstract
Objective
To ascertain the association between father’s lifetime socioeconomic status (SES) and rates of small for gestational age (SGA, defined as weight for gestational age <10th percentile) and infant mortality (defined as <365 days).
Methods
The study sample was limited to the singleton births of African American (n=8,331), non-Latina White (n=18,200), and Latina (n=2,637) women. Stratified and multilevel, multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted on the Illinois transgenerational dataset of infants (1989-1991) and their Chicago-born parents (1956-1976) with appended US census income data (n=29,168). The median family income of father’s census tract residence during childhood and parenthood were used to assess lifetime SES.
Results
Births (n=8,113) to fathers with a lifetime low SES had a SGA rate of 13.3% compared with 6.6% for those (n=10,329) born to fathers with a lifetime high SES, RR = 1.97 (1.79, 2.17). The infant mortality rate of births to fathers with a lifetime low SES exceeded that of infant mortality rate of births to fathers with a lifetime high SES: 13/1,000 vs 5/1,000, respectively; RR = 2.71 (1.94, 3.77). The adjusted (controlling for mother’s age, education, marital status, and race/ethnicity) OR of SGA for fathers with childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs high) SES were 1.15 (1.01, 1.31), 1.13 (1.02, 1.26), and 1.19 (1.05, 1.34), respectively. The adjusted OR of infant mortality for births to fathers with childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs high) SES were 1.14 (.78, 1.67), 1.40 (.90, 2.18), and 1.31 (.90, 1.92), respectively.
Conclusions
Low paternal socioeconomic status is a previously unrecognized determinant of SGA birth regardless of mother’s demographic status.
Keywords: Small for Gestational Age, Infant Mortality, Father’s Class, Paternal Socioeconomic Status, African American Race
Introduction
Small for gestational age (SGA, defined as birth weight for gestational age <10th percentile), is a major risk factor of infant mortality and morbidity.1-5 Children born small for gestation age are also at increased risk of coronary artery disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes during adulthood.4,5 Moreover, there are transgenerational consequences with mothers born small for gestational age themselves having a nearly two-fold increased risk of delivering SGA infants than mothers who were of appropriate gestational age when born.6 Mother’s socioeconomic status (SES) is a well-known determinant of SGA birth.6-9 In contrast, the association between paternal SES, not captured by marital status, and adverse birth outcome is incompletely understood.10
The limited literature shows that paternal biologic factors (ie, birth weight, height, and age) are associated with infant birth weight.11,12 Most pertinent, a recent investigation found that paternal SES was a risk factor for low birth weight (LBW, defined as <2500g) independent of maternal demographic characteristics.13 However, there are multiple causes of LBW infants with the vast majority defined according to preterm birth rates (PTB, defined as <37 weeks). One study by Blumenshine et al reported that father’s educational attainment was associated with preterm birth.14 To our knowledge, no study has examined if paternal SES is a risk factor for SGA birth or infant mortality.
For unclear reasons, African American women have twice the rate of SGA births than non-Latina White women even among the college-educated.2,6,15 In both groups, unmarried status is a major risk factor for SGA birth.16 This finding strongly suggests a potentially important role of social and economic inequity based on father’s SES for African American women’s pregnancy outcome as measured by SGA rates.
We, therefore, used data from the Illinois vital records and US census data to investigate if father’s SES is associated with SGA births and infant mortality rates (IMR, defined as <365 days). We hypothesized that: 1) paternal lifetime low SES is a risk factor for SGA and infant mortality independent of maternal age, marital status, education attainment, and race/ethnicity; and 2) the association of paternal lifetime SES and SGA rates is stronger among African American compared with non-Latina White women.
Methods
Illinois Transgenerational Birth File
We analyzed the Illinois transgenerational birth file (TGBF) of infants born between 1989-1991 and their parents born between 1956-1976 and subsequently linked to US census data for 1960, 1970, and 1990.17 These were the only years available, and included 267,303 mother-infant dyads.17 Approximately 80% (n=125,949) of Illinois-born fathers birth certificates were linked to the mother-infant vital records as previously described.13,17 The study sample was restricted to infants born in the Chicago metropolitan area (because of the availability of neighborhood income data) whose fathers were acknowledged on their birth certificates. Approximately 80% (n=29,168) of Chicago-born fathers’ birth certificates were linked to the maternal-infant vital records. The institutional review board of Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago approved the investigational protocol.
Paternal Socioeconomic Status
In Chicago, there are 873 census tracts that usually reflect fairly homogeneous populations ranging from 1,500 to 8,000 in number and, with few exceptions, the census tract geography has remained constant.13 Census tract level coding was unavailable for the 1956-1960 birth cohort. For this subgroup we used the community area code.13 There are 77 community areas that were created in the 1920s to reflect naturally occurring neighborhoods and include approximately 11 census tracts (range 1 to 36).
Father’s lifetime SES was based on median family income of the father’s census tract of residence for the 1961-1976 birth (ie, childhood) cohort or the geographically broader community area for the 1956-1960 birth cohort (ie, childhood) and at the time of his infant’s delivery (ie, parenthood). This contextual proxy measure was divided by median cut-offs separately for childhood and parenthood. Further, father’s SES was empirically classified into 4 categories: 1) lifetime residence in bottom half neighborhoods (ie, lifetime low); 2) childhood residence in top half neighborhoods and parenthood residence in bottom half neighborhoods (ie, adulthood low); 3) childhood residence in bottom half neighborhoods and parenthood residence in top half neighborhoods (ie, childhood low); and 4) lifetime residence in top half neighborhoods (ie, lifetime high).
Analytic Sample
The study sample was limited to the singleton births of African American (n=8,331), non-Latina White (n=18,200), and Latina (n=2,637) women.
Infant Outcome
Gestational age was calculated based on mother’s last menstrual period. SGA and term-SGA (>37 weeks) rates were defined by gender according to published population-based norms18 and expressed per 100 live births. Infant mortality was defined as a death occurring at <365 days from birth and calculated per 1,000 live births.
Statistical Analyses
Rates of SGA and infant mortality according to paternal SES were calculated. Within each paternal SES subgroup, we computed: 1) the distribution of mother’s age, education, marital status, and race/ethnicity; 2) SGA rates according to the level of maternal demographic characteristics; and 3) race-specific SGA rates by maternal demographic variables. The sample size of Latinas was too small for Latina-specific analyses. Relative risks (RR) and 95% CIs for SGA and paternal SES were calculated with paternal lifetime high SES as the reference subgroup.19
To better estimate the independent association of paternal SES and adverse birth outcome (as measured by the rates of SGA, term-SGA, and first-year mortality), multivariate, multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed.20 Multilevel models were used because individuals were clustered in neighborhoods (census tracts). The only level 2 variable included in the models was the census tract number to account for clustering. The level 1 variables in the models were maternal age, education, marital status, and race/ethnicity (except in the models that were stratified by race/ethnicity. Lastly, race-specific models were established. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were computed.20
Results
Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the crude rates of SGA and first-year mortality according to paternal lifetime SES, respectively. Births to fathers with a lifetime low SES had a SGA rate of 13.3% compared with 6.6% for births to fathers with a lifetime high SES, RR = 1.97 (1.79, 2.17). The crude first-year mortality rate of births (n=8,113) to fathers with a lifetime low SES exceeded that of births (n=10,329) to fathers with a lifetime high SES: 13/1,000 vs 5/1,000, respectively; RR = 2.71 (1.94, 3.77). Maternal factors such as educational attainment and marital status were positively associated with paternal lifetime SES (Table 1).
Figure 1. Paternal lifetime socioeconomic status and small for gestational age rates. Cook County, Illinois, 1956–1976, 1989–1991.
The RR (95% CI) of SGA for births to men with a childhood, parenthood, or lifetime low (vs lifetime high) socioeconomic status equaled 1.26 (1.13, 1.41), 1.67 (1.47, 1.89), and 1.97 (1.79, 2.17) respectively.
Figure 2. Paternal lifetime socioeconomic status and first year mortality rates; Cook County, Illinois, 1956–1976, 1989–1991.
The RR (95% CI) of first year mortality for births to men with a childhood, parenthood, or lifetime low (vs lifetime high) socioeconomic status equaled 1.41 (.96, 2.08), 2.28 (1.49, 3.47), and 2.71 (1.94, 3.77), respectively.
Table 1. Distribution of maternal sociodemographic characteristics by paternal socioeconomic status (SES), Cook County, Illinois, 1956–1976, 1989–1991 transgenerational birth data.
| Paternal SES | ||||
| Childhood Low | Parenthood Low | Lifetime Low | Lifetime High | |
| n = 7,443 | n = 3,280 | n = 8,113 | n = 10,329 | |
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
| Maternal age, yrsa | ||||
| < 20 | 326 (4.4) | 988 (30.1) | 1,596 (19.7) | 576 (5.6) |
| 20 - 24 | 1,269 (17.1) | 1,062 (32.4) | 2,648 (32.6) | 1,866 (18.1) |
| 25 - 29 | 3,590 (48.2) | 844 (25.7) | 2,725 (33.6) | 4,798 (46.5) |
| 30 - 35 | 2,258 (30.3) | 386 (11.8) | 1,144 (14.1) | 3,089 (29.9) |
| Maternal education, yrsa | ||||
| <12 | 508 (6.8) | 949 (28.9) | 2,188 (27.0) | 561 (5.4) |
| 12 | 3,056 (41.1) | 1,337 (40.8) | 3,322 (41.0) | 4,063 (39.3) |
| >12 | 3,879 (52.1) | 994 (30.3) | 2,603 (32.1) | 5,705 (55.2) |
| Marital statusa | ||||
| Married | 6,364 (85.5) | 1,753 (53.5) | 3,958 (48.8) | 9,376 (90.8) |
| Unmarried | 1,079 (14.5) | 1,527 (46.6) | 4,155 (51.2) | 953 (9.2) |
| Maternal race/ethnicity a | ||||
| African American | 1,643 (22.1) | 1,009 (30.8) | 5,262 (64.9) | 417 (4.0) |
| Non-Latina White | 5,357 (72.0) | 1,630 (49.7) | 1,630 (20.1) | 9,581 (92.8) |
| Latina | 443 (6.0) | 641 (19.5) | 1,221 (15.1) | 331 (3.20) |
a. P<.0001.
Table 2 presents race-specific SGA rates according to paternal lifetime SES and mother’s demographic characteristics. Among married non-Latina White women, there was an increased risk of SGA births to fathers with lifetime low SES (vs high) (RR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.8). For African American women, none of the associations were statistically significant but in the expected direction. Similar findings occurred with respect to race-specific term-SGA rates by paternal SES and mother’s demographics (data not shown, available on request). Because of the relatively small number of African American women in the paternal lifetime high subgroup, we repeated all stratified analyses using paternal lifetime low as the reference group. Although the CIs decreased, the results stayed substantively the same (data not shown, available on request).
Table 2. Small for gestational age rates (SGA defined as weight-for-gestational-age <10th percentile) according to paternal socioeconomic status (SES) and selected maternal demographic characteristics among African American and White women; Cook County, Illinois, 1956–1976, 1989–1991.
| Paternal SES | ||||||||
| Childhood Low | Parenthood Low | Lifetime Low | Lifetime High | |||||
| SGA | RR (95 CI) | SGA | RR (95 CI) | SGA | RR (95 CI) | SGA | RR (95 CI) | |
| African Americans | ||||||||
| n = 1,643 | n = 1,009 | n = 5,262 | n = 417 | |||||
| Maternal age | ||||||||
| <20 years | 16.9 | 1.4 (.8, 2.3) | 15.6 | 1.3 (.8, 2.1) | 14.8 | 1.2 (.8, 1.9) | 12.5 | Ref |
| 20-24 years | 16.2 | 1.3 (.8, 2.0) | 13.1 | 1.0 (.6, 1.7) | 14.2 | 1.1 (.7, 1.7) | 12.8 | Ref |
| 25-29 years | 11.2 | 1.5 (.7, 3.1) | 14.9 | 2.0 (.9, 4.4) | 14.0 | 1.9 (.9, 3.8) | 7.5 | Ref |
| 30-35 years | 12.9 | 1.0 (.4, 2.5) | 14.3 | 1.1 (.4, 3.3) | 17.1 | 1.4 (.6, 3.2) | 12.5 | Ref |
| Maternal education | ||||||||
| <12 years | 20.4 | 1.7 (.8, 3.6) | 19.2 | 1.6 (.8, 3.2) | 17.8 | 1.5 (.8, 2.9) | 11.9 | Ref |
| 12 years | 14.8 | 1.5 (.9, 2.4) | 12.6 | 1.2 (.7, 2.1) | 15.0 | 1.5 (.9, 2.4) | 10.2 | Ref |
| >12 years | 11.9 | 1.0 (.6, 1.4) | 13.0 | 1.0 (.7, 1.7) | 11.9 | 1.0 (.7, 1.4) | 12.4 | Ref |
| Marital status | ||||||||
| Married | 12.2 | 1.6 (.9, 2.7) | 14.3 | 1.8 (1.0, 3.3) | 12.4 | 1.6 (.9, 2.7) | 7.8 | Ref |
| Unmarried | 15.5 | 1.1 (.8, 1.6) | 14.7 | 1.0 (.7, 1.5) | 16.1 | 1.1 (.8, 1.6) | 14.3 | Ref |
| Whites | ||||||||
| n = 5,357 | n = 1,630 | n = 1,630 | n = 9,581 | |||||
| Maternal age | ||||||||
| <20 years | 12.9 | 1.2 (.7, 2.2) | 10.4 | 1.0 (.6, 1.5) | 14.2 | 1.3 (.8, 2.2) | 10.9 | Ref |
| 20-24 years | 8.7 | 1.1 (.9, 1.5) | 8.4 | 1.1 (.8, 1.5) | 10.6 | 1.4 (1.0, 1.9) | 7.6 | Ref |
| 25-29 years | 6.4 | 1.1 (.9, 1.3) | 8.0 | 1.4 (1.0, 1.8) | 8.2 | 1.4 (1.1, 1.8) | 6.0 | Ref |
| 30–35 years | 6.7 | 1.2 (.9, 1.5) | 9.3 | 1.7 (1.1, 2.4) | 10.4 | 1.9 (1.3, 2.6) | 5.6 | Ref |
| Maternal education | ||||||||
| <12 years | 11.8 | 1.1 (.7, 1.7) | 11.7 | 1.1 (.7, 1.6) | 14.5 | 1.4 (.9, 2.0) | 10.7 | Ref |
| 12 years | 7.4 | 1.0 (.9, 1.2) | 9.7 | 1.4 (1.1, 1.7) | 9.1 | 1.3 (.9, 1.6) | 7.2 | Ref |
| >12 years | 6.0 | 1.1 (.9, 1.3) | 5.7 | 1.1 (.7, 1.5) | 6.9 | 1.3 (.9, 1.8) | 5.4 | Ref |
| Marital status | ||||||||
| Married | 6.5 | 1.1 (.9, 1.3) | 8.6 | 1.5 (1.2, 1.8) | 8.8 | 1.5 (1.2, 1.8) | 5.9 | Ref |
| Unmarried | 12.8 | 1.0 (.7, 1.4) | 9.0 | .7 (.5, 1.0) | 12.8 | 1.0 (.7, 1.4) | 12.7 | Ref |
In the multivariable, multilevel logistic regression models (data not shown), the adjusted (controlling for maternal age, education, marital status, and race/ethnicity) OR of 1) SGA births for paternal childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES were 1.15 (1.01, 1.31), 1.13 (1.02, 1.26), and 1.19 (1.05, 1.34), respectively; and 2) term SGA births for paternal childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES were 1.17 (1.04, 1.32), 1.20 (1.05, 1.38), and 1.25 (1.10, 1.41), respectively. For White mothers, the adjusted (controlling for maternal age, education, and marital status) OR of 1) SGA births for paternal childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES equaled 1.12 (.94, 1.34), 1.08 (.95, 1.23), and 1.25 (1.04, 1.51), respectively; and 2) term SGA births for paternal childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES equaled 1.11 (.97, 1.27), 1.17 (.97, 1.42), and 1.30 (1.09, 1.56), respectively. For African American mothers, the adjusted (controlling for maternal age, education, and marital status) OR of 1) SGA births for paternal childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES equaled 1.19 (.87, 1.64), 1.2 (.89, 1.62), and 1.17 (.88, 1.57), respectively; and 2) term SGA births for paternal childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES equaled 1.34 (.94, 1.92), 1.33 (.93, 1.90), and 1.31 (.94, 1.82), respectively.
Finally, the adjusted (controlling for maternal age, education, marital status, and race/ethnicity) OR of infant mortality for paternal childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES equaled 1.14 (.78, 1.67), 1.40 (.90, 2.18), and 1.31 (.90, 1.92), respectively.
Discussion
Our present study adds to the paucity of published data on the relationship between father’s SES and birth outcomes in the United States. We found that paternal childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES are associated with rates of SGA births and first-year mortality. Our stratified analyses show that the relation of paternal SES to SGA births exists among women with the lowest risk sociodemographic characteristic (ie, college-educated). Most striking, births to men with a lifetime low (compared with lifetime high) SES have approximately a 20% greater odds of SGA, independent of maternal demographic characteristics. These results appear to occur similarly among non-Latina White and African American women.
Our data provide new information that low paternal SES experienced in childhood, parenthood, and over the life-course was associated with modest risk of SGA (including term-SGA) independent of maternal age, education, marital status, and race/ethnicity. The findings extend the results of an earlier study, which found an association between paternal SES and LBW rates.13 These findings suggest a similar upstream etiologic process leading to LBW and SGA births. Notwithstanding, the importance of the direct provision of maternal economic and psychosocial support to reducing the risk of adverse birth outcome,21,22 findings from our study suggest that indirect pathways are also plausible. Paternal low SES may lead to the increased occurrence of unhealthy maternal pregnancy related behaviors such as prenatal care usage, weight gain, and cigarette smoking.10 Other possible indirect pathways include father’s attitudes regarding the pregnancy and the relationship between the parents.10 More research is needed to disentangle the causal pathways connecting paternal SES and SGA rates.
Interestingly, father’s upward economic mobility (as measured by low SES limited to childhood) fails to blunt the effect of “inherited” lower class status on adverse birth outcome. Similarly, father’s downward economic mobility (as measured by low SES limited to parenthood) does not exaggerate the effect of “inherited” lower class status on SGA rates. Father’s childhood and parenthood low SES likely results in the decreased provision of financial resources and emotional support to pregnant women.
The association of paternal lifetime SES and SGA rates does not appear to differ between racial groups. This may reflect the smaller sample size of African American women in our study as the vast majority of the point estimates of paternal SES and SGA rates from our stratified and multivariable logistic analyses exceeded unity but the 95% CI included the null value. However, African Americans are uniquely exposed to the double burden of racism and classism.23 As such, the association of paternal SES and SGA among African American women may be stronger, reflecting the additional impact of racial discrimination on adverse birth outcome. For example, structural factors closely linked to discrimination underlie African American (compared with non-Latino White) men’s lower educational attainment, higher prevalence of unemployment, and declining marriage rates.10 We speculate that these phenomena are chronic stressors for African American women. Additionally, they are likely to contribute to the lack of partner support prior and during pregnancy. A prior study found that inadequate partner social support during pregnancy including their absence in the delivery room was a strong risk factor for LBW among a sample of urban African American women.22 To our knowledge, there are no published data on the relationship between father’s experiences with racial discrimination, African American women’s social support, and adverse birth outcome.
Since weight-for-gestational age is a determinant of infant first year survival, it is not surprising that our present study shows that father’s childhood, parenthood, and lifetime low (vs lifetime high) SES are associated with elevated IMR. However, the association of paternal SES and IMR weakens when adjusting for maternal demographic risk factors. More detailed studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better delineate the relation of paternal SES to IMR.
We encourage maternal and child health practitioners to take father’s SES into account when designing intervention programs to improve birth outcomes. This could include targeted interventions such as group-centered prenatal care for women with significant others of low SES. In a comprehensive literature review, Thielen reported lower LBW rates among women who participated in group-centered (compared with individual) prenatal care.24 An older investigation found that father’s participation was associated with higher birth weights and had a strong effect for births of African American women compared to non-Latina Whites.25 Non-traditional upstream public health initiatives, such as targeting the root sources of father’s low SES, may also prove useful in improving birth outcomes.
Study Limitations
The Illinois TGBF is one of the few US-derived databases of infant vital records linked to the vital records of both mothers and fathers.17 Because of the addition of US census income data to each birth certificate, it uniquely allows for the investigation of father’s childhood and parenthood SES (as objectively defined by neighborhood income at two time points) and SGA rates; however, it has four significant limitations.17 First, the study sample was limited to infants whose fathers were acknowledged on their birth certificate. The absence of named or acknowledged fathers is a risk factor for poor birth outcome.26 Therefore, our findings may be generalizable only to the lower risk births with named or acknowledged fathers (approximately 80% of our mother-infant linked births).13,17 Second, the objective assessment of father’s SES during parenthood may be inaccurate for those who don’t live in the same home or census tract as the mother.13,17 However, this weakness would not apply to births of married parents. Third, our outcome variables (rates of SGA, term-SGA, and infant mortality) were from 1989-1991 and may not be generalizable to contemporary urban women’s birth outcomes. Lastly, the number of births to Latina women were too few for us to investigate the relation of paternal SES to their risk of SGA delivery.
Conclusion
Our study shows that paternal low SES (as measured during childhood and/or parenthood) is a previously unrecognized risk factor for SGA birth regardless of mother’s demographic status.
References
- 1. Matthews TJ, MacDorman MF, Thoma ME. Infant mortality statistics from the 2013 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(9):1-30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kramer MS, Ananth CV, Platt RW, Joseph KS. US Black vs White disparities in foetal growth: physiological or pathological? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(5):1187-1195. 10.1093/ije/dyl125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Slykerman RF, Thompson JM, Clark PM, et al. Determinants of developmental delay in infants aged 12 months. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):121-128. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00796.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Evensen KA, Steinshamn S, Tjønna AE, et al. Effects of preterm birth and fetal growth retardation on cardiovascular risk factors in young adulthood. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(4):239-245. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):61-73. 10.1056/NEJMra0708473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Castrillio SM, Rankin KM, David RJ, Collins JW Jr. Small-for-gestational age and preterm birth across generations: a population-based study of Illinois births. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(10):2456-2464. 10.1007/s10995-014-1484-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Beard JR, Lincoln D, Donoghue D, et al. Socioeconomic and maternal determinants of small-for-gestational age births: patterns of increasing disparity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(5):575-583. 10.1080/00016340902818170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Love C, David RJ, Rankin KM, Collins JW Jr. Exploring weathering: effects of lifelong economic environment and maternal age on low birth weight, small for gestational age, and preterm birth in African-American and white women. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(2):127-134. 10.1093/aje/kwq109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Räisänen S, Gissler M, Sankilampi U, Saari J, Kramer MR, Heinonen S. Contribution of socioeconomic status to the risk of small for gestational age infants—a population-based study of 1,390,165 singleton live births in Finland. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12(1):28-32. 10.1186/1475-9276-12-28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Misra DP, Caldwell C, Young AA Jr, Abelson S. Do fathers matter? Paternal contributions to birth outcomes and racial disparities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(2):99-100. 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Shah PS; Knowledge Synthesis Group on determinants of preterm/low birthweight births . Paternal factors and low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age births: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(2):103-123. 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Coutinho R, David RJ, Collins JW Jr. Relation of parental birth weights to infant birth weight among African Americans and whites in Illinois: a transgenerational study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(10):804-809. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Collins JW Jr, Rankin KM, David RJ. Paternal lifelong socioeconomic position and low birth weight rates: relevance to the african-american women’s birth outcome disadvantage. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(8):1759-1766. 10.1007/s10995-016-1981-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Blumenshine PM, Egerter SA, Libet ML, Braveman PA. Father’s education: an independent marker of risk for preterm birth. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(1):60-67. 10.1007/s10995-009-0559-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Collins JW Jr, Butler AG. Racial differences in the prevalence of small-for-dates infants among college-educated women. Epidemiology. 1997;8(3):315-317. 10.1097/00001648-199705000-00015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Shah PS, Zao J, Ali S; Knowledge Synthesis Group of Determinants of preterm/LBW births . Maternal marital status and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(7):1097-1109. 10.1007/s10995-010-0654-z 10.1007/s10995-010-0654-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. David R, Rankin K, Lee K, Prachand N, Love C, Collins J Jr. The Illinois transgenerational birth file: life-course analysis of birth outcomes using vital records and census data over decades. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14(1):121-132. 10.1007/s10995-008-0433-2 10.1007/s10995-008-0433-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):163-168. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. SAS Institute Inc SAS 9.1.3 SAS/STAT. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Garfield CF, Duncan G, Rutsohn J, et al. A longitudinal study of paternal mental health during transition to fatherhood as young adults. Pediatrics. 2014;133(5):836-843. 10.1542/peds.2013-3262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lespinasse AA, David RJ, Collins JW, Handler AS, Wall SN. Maternal support in the delivery room and birthweight among African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96(2):187-195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. David RJ, Collins JW. Layers of inequality: power, policy, and health. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(S1)(suppl 1):S8-S10. 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Thielen K. Exploring the group prenatal care model: a critical review of the literature. J Perinat Educ. 2012;21(4):209-218. 10.1891/1058-1243.21.4.209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Barth RP, Claycomb M, Loomis A. Services to adolescent fathers. Health Soc Work. 1988;13(4):277-287. 10.1093/hsw/13.4.277 10.1093/hsw/13.4.277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Alio AP, Kornosky JL, Mbah AK, Marty PJ, Salihu HM. The impact of paternal involvement on feto-infant morbidity among Whites, Blacks and Hispanics. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14(5):735-741. 10.1007/s10995-009-0482-1 10.1007/s10995-009-0482-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


