Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jan 24;9:464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36893-0

Incidental findings on brain MRI among Chinese at the age of 55–65 years: the Taizhou Imaging Study

Shuyuan Li 1,2,#, Fang Fang 3,#, Mei Cui 4, Yanfeng Jiang 2,5, Yingzhe Wang 4, Xuhui Kong 6, Weizhong Tian 6, Min Fan 7, Ziyu Yuan 2, Jinhua Chen 6, Qi Yang 4, Fuzhong Xue 2,8, Jiucun Wang 2,5,9, Ming Lu 10, Xiaofeng Wang 2,5,9,, Xingdong Chen 2,5,9,, Li Jin 2,5,9,#, Weimin Ye 3,#
PMCID: PMC6345793  PMID: 30679548

Abstract

Asymptomatic brain abnormalities are common incidental findings on brain MRI in the elderly population and can be regarded as imaging markers of early stroke and dementia. We initiated the Taizhou Imaging Study (TIS) to examine the prevalence and correlates of incidental findings using brain MRI among an elderly population residing in a rural area of China. A total of 562 individuals, at the age of 55 to 65 years, participated in the TIS study with a response rate of 90%. The prevalence of lacunes, white matter hyperintensity (WMH), cerebral microbleeds (CMB), perivascular space, and intracranial arterial stenosis was 26.69%, 10.68%, 18.51%, 27.76%, and 12.81%, respectively. Age and hypertension were the major correlates of these incidental findings. Per each year increase in age, the risks of WMH and CMB increased by 15% and 14%. Compared to individuals with normal blood pressure, individuals with hypertension had an increased risk of all incidental findings, with the adjusted odds ratios of 2.28 to 5.45. Correlations of age, gender and body mass index with brain gray matter fraction were also observed. The high prevalence of these findings indicates a need of preventative strategy to help prevent future stroke and dementia in this population.

Introduction

Ageing-related diseases, such as stroke and dementia, have posed great burden to our society. In China, in parallel to the dramatic population aging, stroke has become the leading cause of death and responsible for about one fifth of all deaths annually. There are at present about 7.5 million survivors of stroke in China and every year 2.5 million new stroke cases are diagnosed1. Similarly, the number of dementia cases increased from 3.68 to 9.19 million between 1990 and 2010 in China2. With the current lack of effective treatment strategies for stroke and dementia, it is essential to develop early detection techniques aiming to initiate preventive and therapeutic interventions in the early stage of these diseases.

It has been demonstrated that asymptomatic brain abnormalities, including structure and functional brain changes, are present years before the clinical onset of stroke and dementia and can indeed be visualized using brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)3,4. Along with the rapid improvement of MRI technologies, brain MRI has been included to an increasing degree in large population-based cohort studies, such as the Rotterdam Scan study5, the Framingham Heart study6, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study7, the UK Biobank study8, and the German National Cohort study9. Previous studies have for example shown that lacunes, white matter hyperintensity (WMH), and cerebral microbleeds (CMB) are the most common incidental findings on brain MRI5,10. Although most of these findings are asymptomatic, numerous studies have demonstrated that they are associated with multiple mild clinical symptoms and signs, such as cognitive impairment, gait disturbance, and psychiatric disorders11,12, and are also related to future risks of stroke and dementia1315. In 2011, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) published a statement about the vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia, in which the association between MRI-based cerebrovascular disease-associated injury and vascular cognitive impairment was particularly emphasized16. In 2017, AHA/ASA published another statement demonstrating that silent brain infarcts and WMH are associated with the risk of future symptomatic stroke, and primary stroke prevention should be indicated in patients with silent brain infarcts, WMH, or CMB17. All the aforementioned facts indicate that MRI findings may be regarded as imaging markers of early stroke and dementia, emphasizing the significance of these image changes.

The prevalence and correlates of various incidental findings on brain MRI have been widely studied in the populations of North America and Europe1820. However, the corresponding data are relatively scarce among general Chinese populations17. The aging society and the rapid economic growth during the past decades might have contributed to a rapid increase in the burden of ageing-related diseases in Chinese populations. Until now, only three population-based studies, including the Risk Index for Subclinical brain lesions in Hong Kong (RISK) study21, the Shanghai Aging Study (SAS)22, and the Shunyi study23, have made efforts to study incidental findings from brain MRI in the Chinese population24. Results of these studies showed that the prevalence of some incidental MRI findings was different from other populations24. However, all the three studies were conducted in the urban areas in China (Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Beijing), leaving the corresponding research questions in the rural areas unraveled.

Taizhou Longitudinal Study is a prospective, population-based study aiming at exploring the environmental and genetic risk factors of common chronic diseases in Chinese population25. Based on the Taizhou Longitudinal Study, we initiated the Taizhou Imaging Study (TIS) among an elderly population residing in a rural area of China. We targeted the study to a population at the age of 55–65 years, who had no clear clinical symptoms for stroke or dementia but might have a relatively high prevalence of preclinical abnormalities. In this paper, we aimed to report on the prevalence and correlates of incidental findings using brain MRI scan in this population.

Methods

Study design and study population

The Taizhou Imaging Study (TIS) is an ongoing population-based, neuroimaging study initiated in March 2013 in Taizhou City, Jiangsu Province, China. The TIS study is nested within the Taizhou Longitudinal Study25. For the phase I of the TIS study, two villages with the highest participation rates in the Taizhou Longitudinal Study were selected from two towns of Taixing, a county-level city in Taizhou. The individuals in these two villages that fulfilled the following criteria were invited to participate in the study: (1) at the age of 55 to 65 years; (2) Han Chinese (self-reported, at least four generations) and had been a resident of these two villages for at least 10 years; 3) able to walk and communicate normally, and participate in the questionnaire survey and physical examination independently. Individuals that had had stroke, cancer, or severe liver or renal disease were considered not eligible for the study. Consequently, 624 individuals in the two villages were eligible for our study. Among them, 62 individuals did not respond to the invitation or refused to participate in the study. Overall, a total of 562 individuals participated and completed all procedures from March 2013 to January 2015, with a response rate of 90%. The responders and non-responders had no detectable differences in age and sex distribution. The enrolment procedures are shown in detail in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The enrolment procedures of the Taizhou Imaging Study (phase I).

Questionnaire interview, physical examination and biological sample collection

After informed consent, a structured electronic questionnaire was administered by trained staff to obtain information on demographics and socioeconomic status, lifestyles, personal health status, family disease history, reproductive history (for women only), mental status, cognitive function (assessed using the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)), and olfactory function (Table S1). All interviews were tape-recorded, and 5% of the recorded interviews were re-evaluated to ensure good quality of the interviews.

All participants received a full health check-up in Taizhou People’s Hospital, including anthropometric and blood pressure measurements, 12-Lead electrocardiography, chest X-ray, carotid artery ultrasound, bone mineral density, Ankle-to-brachial systolic blood pressure ratio and Pulse wave velocity, and brain MRI (Table S2).

Biological specimens including fasting blood (8-ml EDTA-anticoagulant and 8-ml non-anticoagulant), urine (15 ml), saliva (2~3 ml), and faeces were collected from each participant. The samples were processed using standard protocols. Briefly, EDTA-anticoagulant blood samples were subjected to centrifugation within one hour and aliquoted into ten barcoded cryogenic vials (four plasma samples, two buffy coat samples, and four red blood cell samples), while non-anticoagulant blood samples were aliquoted into six barcoded cryogenic vials (five serum samples, and one blood clot samples) after centrifugation. Saliva sample was mixed with 3 mL lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 50 mM EDTA, 50 mM sucrose, 100 mM NaCl, and 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) and later transferred into one barcoded cryogenic vial. Urine and faeces were aliquoted into four and three barcoded cryogenic vials, respectively. All biospecimens were placed in coolboxes at 4 °C for less than 4 hours before being transported to the −80 °C freezers in the Biobank of the Fudan University Taizhou Institute of Health Sciences. One aliquot of serum was used for clinical testing of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glucose, alanine amino transferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, Uric acid, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and cystatin C by an automatic biochemical analyzer (TOSHIBA TBA-40FR) and all the other aliquots were stored at −80 °C freezers in the biobank.

MRI Image acquisition and assessment

All MRI images were obtained from a 3-T Siemens Magnetom Verio syngo scanner, using an eight-channel head coil at Taizhou People’s Hospital. The same MRI protocol was performed on all participants, including mainly the following sequences: T1-weighted sequence, T2- and T2*-weighted gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence, proton-density-weighted imaging (PDWI) sequence, perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) sequence, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequence and time of flight (TOF) 3D angio sequence. The slice thickness was 1.5 mm for T1WI, 5.0 mm for T2*GRE, 0.6 mm for TOF-3D, 3.0 mm for T2WI, FLAIR, PDWI, DTI, and PWI, respectively (Table S3).

All images were read by two experienced neurologists, Mei Cui and Qi Yang, who received small vessel diseases (SVD) imaging evaluation training strictly according to STRIVE criteria before the start of the study26. The neurologists were not aware of each other’s assessment and had no clinical information about the participants (disease history, carotid artery ultrasound, etc.), apart from age and sex of the participants and the date of MRI imaging. The neurologists read images independently through a standard digital picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and provided a good inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.81). In case of controversy, a senior neuro-radiologist (Weijun Tang) was consulted for a final diagnosis. The primary diagnoses included lacunes, WMH, CMB, perivascular space (PVS), intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS), and others (venous angioma, aneurysm, cavernous hemangioma, meningioma, empty sella, arachnoid cysts, ventricle cyst, 5th and 6th ventricle, 6th ventricle, widen septum pellucidum, and transparent compartment widened) (Fig. 2; Table S4). Lacunes, WMH, CMB, and PVS are the common markers of SVD and their diagnoses were made following the STRIVE criteria. As WMH is common in the elderly population, the discrimination of clinically significant lesions from the aging-related ones is important. We used therefore the Fazekas scale to separate WMH into grade 0–327. Accordingly, WMH in grade 0–1 is regarded as a mild lesion that is more related to aging, while grade 2–3 suggests a severer abnormality that is more relevant to a pathological process (e.g., hypertension, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, etc.). In addition, previous studies have focused on small PVS with a maximum diameter of <2 mm on MRI to separate PVS from lacunes. However, recent studies lend strong support to the hypothesis that large PVS, which represents a more severe form of the lesion spectrum, serves as an independent MRI marker of SVD and may reflect processes related to cognitive impairment. Thus, we defined PVS as round or tubular deficits with CSF-like signal and a short axis of ≥3 mm in the subcortical area in this study. ICAS, as a common large vessel disease, was defined as local loss of signal from the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, basilar artery, or vertebral artery on 3D-TOF MRA according to the WASID criteria28. All other diagnoses were made according to the criteria listed in the book of “Diagnostic Neuroradiology”29. The diagnoses were made based on MRI findings alone and were not confirmed by histology.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Incidental findings on brain MRI. Arrows indicate the abnormalities in each image. Panel A, lacunes; Panel B, white matter hyperintensity; Panel C, cerebral microbleeds; Panel D, perivascular space; Panel E, intracranial arterial stenosis.

Moreover, the brain volume, including total intracranial volume, total gray matter volume, and total white matter volume, was estimated using FreeSurfer version 6.0.0 software package (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). The results of FreeSurfer were reviewed for accuracy by the consensus of two experienced neurologists (Yingzhe Wang and He Wang), and 31 of the 562 participants (5.52%) were excluded in the analyses of brain volume because of poor image quality, such as motion artifacts and inaccurate position. The brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) was defined as the ratio of brain tissue volume (total gray matter volume + total white matter volume) to total intracranial volume, and the brain gray matter fraction (BGMF) was defined as the ratio of total gray matter volume to total intracranial volume.

We delivered a MRI report to every participant. For participants with incidental findings that require additional clinical workup or medical treatment, such as aneurysm and meningioma, we provided them with a referral to a neurosurgeon or neurologist. Incidental findings that are believed not to be clinically relevant were not recorded as incidental findings, including simple sinus disease, pineal cysts, and ventricular asymmetry.

Potential correlates of MRI markers

Current smokers were defined as individuals that reported regular smoking for at least six months, whereas former smokers were defined as individuals that reported to have smoked regularly for at least six months, but not during the year preceding the survey. Current smokers and former smokers were considered as ever smokers. Current alcohol drinkers were individuals consuming more than three drinks per week, while former alcohol drinkers were individuals that had drunk regularly for at least six months, but not during the year preceding the survey. Current alcohol drinkers and former alcohol drinkers were considered as ever alcohol drinkers. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by squared height (m2). Hypertension was defined by systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ≥90 mm Hg, a previous diagnosis of hypertension, or use of antihypertensive drugs. Diabetes was determined by a fasting level of plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L, a previous diagnosis of diabetes, or treatment with antidiabetic drugs. Hyperlipidemia was defined by plasma total cholesterol ≥5.2 mmol/L, triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L, a previous diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, or current use of lipid lowering drugs.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared using Student t test or ANOVA. The variables with skewed distributions were described using median (interquartile range, IQR) and were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Categorical variables were summarized as number (percent) and were compared using Chi square test. Individuals with one of the specific MRI findings (lacunes, WMH, CMB, or PVS) were classified into the group with one SVD marker. Individuals with two, three, or four of these findings were grouped accordingly. The prevalence of each MRI finding and the SVD markers was calculated by age and sex. The associations of cardiovascular risk factors with MRI findings were assessed by binary logistic regression, using individuals without any MRI finding as the reference. The total score of MMSE was log-transformed to fit normal distribution. The associations of MRI findings with the log-transformed MMSE score were assessed using linear regression models. Fully adjusted models included age (per year), sex (male versus female), BMI (per kg/m2), education (per year), smoking (ever versus never), alcohol drinking (ever versus never), hypertension (yes versus no), diabetes (yes versus no), and hyperlipidemia (yes versus no). All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (release 9.3, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA) and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of School of Life Sciences of Fudan University (number of Institutional Review Board approval: 469). This study was conducted in accordance with the approved protocol, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Results

The basic characteristics of the studied population are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of the 562 participants was 59.25 ± 2.72 years, and 303 of the subjects (53.91%) were women. Males and females had comparable mean age, but females had higher BMI. Females were more likely to be less educated (median: 1 year), non-smokers (98.31%), and non-alcohol-drinkers (96.62%). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia in the entire study population was 55.16%, 14.23%, and 54.80%, respectively. There was no clear difference in the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes by sex, although females had more hyperlipidemia. The median score of MMSE was 27, and was higher among males than females.

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the participants of the Taizhou Imaging Study.

Total Males Females
N 562 (100) 259 (46.09) 303 (53.91)
Age, years, mean ± SD 59.25 ± 2.72 59.36 ± 2.74 59.15 ± 2.70
   55–59, n (%) 301 (53.56) 133 (51.35) 168 (55.45)
   60–65, n (%) 261 (46.44) 126 (48.65) 135 (44.55)
Education, years, median (IQR) 6 (0, 9) 9 (6, 9) 1 (0, 6)*
BMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD 24.09 ± 3.30 23.56 ± 3.02 24.54 ± 3.46*
Smoking status, n (%)
   Current smoker 195 (35.33) 191 (74.61) 4 (1.35)*
   Former smoker 29 (5.25) 28 (10.94) 1 (0.34)
   Non-smoker 328 (59.42) 37 (14.45) 291 (98.31)
Alcohol drinking status, n (%)
   Current drinker 162 (29.35) 153 (59.77) 9 (3.04)*
   Former drinker 18 (3.26) 17 (6.64) 1 (0.34)
   Non-drinker 372 (67.39) 86 (33.59) 286 (96.62)
Hypertension, n (%) 310 (55.16) 133 (51.35) 177 (58.42)
Diabetes, n (%) 80 (14.23) 33 (12.74) 47 (15.51)
Hyperlipidemia, n (%) 308 (54.80) 127 (49.03) 181 (59.74)*
MMSE, median (IQR)# 27 (23, 29) 29 (27, 30) 24 (20, 27)*

BMI, body mass index; MMSE, Mini-Mental Status Examination; IQR, interquartile range.

#Numbers of missing data were 19 for BMI, 10 for smoking status, 10 for alcohol drinking status, and 9 for MMSE.

*Differences between males and females were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The P-values were obtained using Student’s t test for continuous variables with normal or approximately normal distribution, using Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables with skewed distribution, and using chi-square test for categorical variables.

Lacunes and PVS were present in 150 (26.69%) and 156 (27.76%) of the participants (Table 2). No clear difference was found in the prevalence of these two MRI findings by age and sex. The prevalence of WMH-periventricular (Fezekas ≥2) and WMH-deep (Fezekas ≥2) was 10.68% and 8.72%, respectively, both of which were higher in the older age group. All individuals with WMH-deep had also WMH-periventricular. CMB was more prevalent in the older age group (23.37%) than younger age group (14.29%), and in females (21.78%) than males (14.67%). A higher prevalence of multiple SVD markers was observed in the older age group. The prevalence of ICAS was 12.81% and did not differ by age or sex. There was a decreasing trend of BGMF with increasing age, but there was no similar trend for BPF. The BGMF and BPF were greater in females than males. The prevalence of other MRI markers is shown in Table S4. None of the individuals with the reported venous angioma (n = 2), aneurysm (n = 1), cavernous hemanginoma (n = 1), empty sella (n = 11), and meningiomas (n = 5) reported symptoms.

Table 2.

The distribution of common MRI markers among the participants of the Taizhou Imaging Study.

Findings Entire study Age, years Gender
55–59 60–65 P * Males Females P *
N 562 301 261 259 303
Lacunes, n (%) 150 (26.69) 72 (23.92) 78 (29.89) 0.11 62 (23.94) 88 (29.04) 0.17
WMH, n (%) 60 (10.68) 22 (7.31) 38 (14.56) 0.006 26 (10.04) 34 (11.22) 0.65
  Periventricular 60 (10.68) 22 (7.31) 38 (14.56) 0.006 26 (10.04) 34 (11.22) 0.65
   Deep 49 (8.72) 16 (5.32) 33 (12.64) 0.002 19 (7.34) 30 (9.90) 0.28
CMB, n (%) 104 (18.51) 43 (14.29) 61 (23.37) 0.006 38 (14.67) 66 (21.78) 0.03
  Brain stem 10 (1.78) 5 (1.66) 5 (1.92) 0.82 5 (1.93) 5 (1.65) 0.80
  Basal ganglia 50 (8.90) 24 (7.97) 26 (9.96) 0.41 19 (7.34) 31 (10.23) 0.23
  Cortical 69 (12.28) 27 (8.97) 42 (16.09) 0.01 25 (9.65) 44 (14.52) 0.08
PVS, n (%) 156 (27.76) 80 (26.58) 76 (29.12) 0.50 73 (28.19) 83 (27.39) 0.83
Number of SVD markers, n (%)
  0 298 (53.02) 169 (56.15) 129 (49.43) 0.009 143 (55.21) 155 (51.16) 0.19
  1 149 (26.51) 86 (28.57) 63 (24.14) 69 (26.64) 80 (26.40)
  2 47 (8.36) 17 (5.65) 30 (11.49) 21 (8.11) 26 (8.58)
  3 45 (8.01) 19 (6.31) 26 (9.96) 16 (6.18) 29 (9.57)
  4 23 (4.09) 10 (3.32) 13 (4.98) 10 (3.86) 13 (4.29)
ICAS, n (%) 72 (12.81) 43 (14.29) 29 (11.11) 0.26 28 (10.81) 44 (14.52) 0.19
  ICA 5 (0.89) 4 (1.33) 1 (0.38) 0.23 4 (1.54) 1 (0.33) 0.13
  MCA 45 (8.01) 27 (8.97) 18 (6.90) 0.37 15 (5.79) 30 (9.90) 0.07
  ACA 5 (0.89) 1 (0.33) 4 (1.53) 0.13 1 (0.39) 4 (1.32) 0.24
  BA 10 (1.78) 6 (1.99) 4 (1.53) 0.68 2 (0.77) 8 (2.64) 0.10
  VA 18 (3.20) 8 (2.66) 10 (3.83) 0.43 8 (3.09) 10 (3.30) 0.89
BGMF, median (IQR), %# 37.8 (34.0, 40.2) 38.3 (34.9,40.5) 37.3 (33.4, 39.8) 0.02 35.7 (30.7, 37.7) 39.7 (37.7, 41.0) <0.0001
BPF, median (IQR), %# 73.3 (71.1, 75.8) 73.5 (71.3, 75.6) 73.1 (70.8, 76.1) 0.26 72.8 (70.0, 76.5) 73.6 (71.7, 75.4) 0.02

WMH, white matter hyperintensity; CMB, cerebral microbleeds; PVS, perivascular space; SVD, small vessel diseases; ICAS, intracranial arterial stenosis; BGMF, brain gray matter fraction; BPF, brain parenchymal fraction; IQR, interquartile range.

#Numbers of missing data were 31.

*The P-values were obtained using Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables with skewed distribution, and using chi-square test for categorical variables.

Among all the correlates studied, age and hypertension are the major factors that were significantly related to the MRI findings (Table 3). Per each year increase in age, the risk of WMH and CMB increased by 15% (confidence intervals 2% to 31%) and 14% (confidence intervals 3% to 26%), respectively. Compared to individuals with normal blood pressure, those with hypertension had an increased risk of all SVD markers and ICAS, with adjusted ORs of 2.28 to 5.45. An increasing magnitude of the associations was observed with the increasing severity of SVD markers (ORs increased from 1.72 to 4.46). In addition, ever alcohol drinking was associated with ICAS, whereas age, sex, and BMI were associated with BGMF (Table 3).

Table 3.

Associations of baseline characteristics with the MRI markers among the participants of the Taizhou Imaging Study.

MRI markers Age (per year) Gender (males vs females) BMI (per kg/m2) Education (per year) Smoking (ever vs never smokers) Alcohol drinking (ever vs never drinkers) Hypertension (yes vs no) Diabetes (yes vs no) Hyperlipidemia (yes vs no)
OR (95% CI)#
Lacunes 1.06 (0.98, 1.14) 1.25 (0.46, 3.37) 0.99 (0.93, 1.07) 1.00 (0.94, 1.08) 0.70 (0.27, 1.85) 1.36 (0.70, 2.65) 2.28 (1.43, 3.65) ** 0.73 (0.38, 1.41) 0.94 (0.60, 1.47)
WMH 1.15 (1.02, 1.31) * 0.76 (0.22, 2.55) 0.96 (0.88, 1.06) 1.01 (0.92, 1.12) 0.45 (0.13, 1.53) 1.14 (0.44, 3.02) 5.45 (2.55,11.65) ** 0.96 (0.41, 2.23) 1.01 (0.53, 1.94)
CMB 1.14 (1.03,1.26) * 1.47 (0.49, 4.37) 0.97 (0.89,1.05) 1.02 (0.94, 1.10) 0.64 (0.22, 1.92) 1.21 (0.56, 2.63) 2.98 (1.73, 5.13) ** 0.55 (0.25, 1.22) 1.12 (0.67, 1.22)
PVS 1.03 (0.95, 1.12) 0.60 (0.24, 1.52) 0.97 (0.90, 1.04) 1.00 (0.94, 1.08) 0.42 (0.17, 1.06) 1.15 (0.59, 2.25) 2.66 (1.68, 4.22) ** 0.71 (0.37,1.38) 0.93 (0.59,1.45)
Number of SVD markers
1–2 vs 0 1.03 (0.95, 1.10) 0.98 (0.45, 2.14) 1.00 (0.93, 1.06) 1.02 (0.96, 1.08) 0.71 (0.33, 1.51) 1.06 (0.60, 1.88) 1.72 (1.15, 2.58) * 0.62 (0.35, 1.10) 0.91 (0.61, 1.34)
3–4 vs 0 1.13 (1.00, 1,26) * 1.18 (0.38, 3.65) 0.97 (0.89, 1.06) 0.99 (0.90, 1.08) 0.88 (0.29, 2,68) 0.93 (0.38, 2.27) 4.46 (2.25, 8.84) ** 0.75 (0.34, 1.66) 0.82 (0.45, 1.49)
ICAS 0.95 (0.85,1.07) 1.00 (0.26,3.80) 1.03 (0.94, 1.12) 0.98 (0.90, 1.08) 0.29 (0.07, 1.14) 3.25(1.04,10.2) * 4.13 (2.11, 8.11) ** 0.58 (0.24, 1.42) 1.51 (0.81, 2.83)
β (SE) #
BGMF, % −0.17 (0.07) * 3.75 (0.74) ** 0.15 (0.06) * 0.01 (0.06) −0.09 (0.72) −0.63 (0.55) −0.61 (0.39) −0.41 (0.53) 0.03 (0.38)
BPF, % −0.02 (0.08) 0.39 (0.81) 0.05 (0.06) 0.01 (0.06) 0.31 (0.78) −0.70 (0.60) 0.35 (0.42) 0.03 (0.58) −0.22 (0.41)

WMH, white matter hyperintensity; CMB, cerebral microbleeds; PVS, perivascular space; SVD, small vessel diseases; ICAS, intracranial arterial stenosis; BGMF, brain gray matter fraction; BPF, brain parenchymal fraction.

#Covariates listed in the table were mutually adjusted.

*P < 0.05.

**P < 0.01.

No association was found between all the MRI findings and the MMSE score (Table 4).

Table 4.

Associations of cognitive function assessed by MMSE with the common MRI findings among the participants of the Taizhou Imaging Study.

MRI markers MMSE score (log-transformed)
β (SE)# P #
Lacunes 0.02 (0.02) 0.43
WMH 0.03 (0.03) 0.35
CMB 0.003 (0.02) 0.90
PVS 0.03 (0.02) 0.12
Number of SVD markers
   1–2 vs 0 0.02 (0.02) 0.28
   3–4 vs 0 0.002 (0.03) 0.92
ICAS 0.007 (0.03) 0.80
BGMF, % 0.003 (0.002) 0.15
BPF, % 0.002 (0.002) 0.41

WMH, white matter hyperintensity; CMB, cerebral microbleeds; PVS, perivascular space; SVD, small vessel diseases; ICAS, intracranial arterial stenosis; BGMF, brain gray matter fraction; BPF, brain parenchymal fraction.

#Adjusted for age (per year), sex (male versus female), BMI (per kg/m2), education (per year), smoking (ever versus never), alcohol drinking (ever versus never), hypertension (yes versus no), diabetes (yes versus no), and hyperlipidemia (yes versus no).

Discussion

Given the known clinical relevance of brain MRI incidental findings in the pathophysiology of stroke and dementia, understanding the burden of these preclinical lesions in the Chinese population will provide important information regarding the future burden of healthcare service in China. We found that several incidental findings of brain abnormalities, including lacunes, WMH, CMB, PVS and ICAS, were common in a rural population at the age of 55 to 65 years in China. Age and hypertension were further found as the major correlates of these incidental findings.

Lacunes, WMH, CMB, and PVS are the main MRI image markers of SVD, the most common vascular cause of dementia and contributes about one-fifth of all stroke cases worldwide30. Due to the different age and sex distributions of the study populations, and the different MRI acquisition and assessment procedures, comparison of the prevalence of these SVD markers in our study with others is challenging (please see a summary of previous findings in Table S5). Generally, the prevalence of lacunes appears to be higher in Asian countries31, and our results coincide with this. The prevalence of lacunes was 26.69% in our study, higher than that of Rotterdam Scan Study20 and Canadian Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE)-MIND study32. In the Rotterdam Scan Study20, asymptomatic brain infarcts, which is another term of lacunes, was present in 7.2% of the study participants (n = 2000, mean age of 63.3 years). The prevalence of silent brain infarct in the age groups of 50–59 years (n = 324) and 60–69 years (n = 262) was 5.9% and 11.5% in the Canadian PURE-MIND study32. Corresponding studies in the healthy elderly population in China are scant. The prevalence of lacunes in the RISK study (n = 850, mean age of 71.4 years)33 and the SAS study (n = 321, mean age of 69 years)24 was 32.6% and 28.6%, similar to the results of the present study. The prevalence of WMH may vary with different race or ethnicity and increase with age17,34. Considering individuals at the same or similar ages, the prevalence of WMH-deep in the present study (8.72%) is similar to that of Austrian Stroke Prevention Study34 and PURE-MIND study (7%)32. However, the prevalence of WMH-periventricular was higher in our study (10.68%) compared to the abovementioned studies (2%)17. A high prevalence of WMH (36.8%) was also found in the SAS study, which was conducted in Shanghai, China24. This may partly be due to a higher prevalence of hypertension in our study (55.16%) and the SAS study (54.4%), compared to the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study (32%) and PURE-MIND study (24%). Microbleeds are more prevalent among elderly people, ranging from 6% among people at the age of 45–50 years to 36% among people at the age of 80 years and above35. The prevalence of CMBs was 18.51% in our study, which is similar to the reported prevalence of 16.8% among the participants at the age of 60–69 years in the Rotterdam Scan Study35. The prevalence of CMB was however lower in the Framingham Heart Study (8.8%; n = 1965, mean age of 66.5 years)36 and in Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik Study (11.1%; n = 1962, mean age of 76 years)37. Compared to lacunes, WMH, and CMB, few population-based studies have evaluated the prevalence of PVS, especially large PVS. The prevalence of 27.76% as noted in the present study is within the range of 16.2% as reported in the AGES-Reykjavik Study (n = 2612, mean age of 74.6 years)38 to 42% as reported in the Northern Manhattan Study (n = 1228, mean age of 71 years)39. Small PVS, defined as a maximum diameter of <2 mm in cross-section, was thought to be a normal phenomenon40 and can be visualized in the brain MRI of nearly all individuals of the HUNT-MRI study (100%; n = 997, 50–65 years)41. Previous studies have demonstrated that ICAS may account for about 10% of stroke cases in Northern America and European countries, whereas the corresponding estimate is 50% in China42. The prevalence of ICAS (12.81%) in the present study is similar to the prevalence reported in previous studies among Chinese in the Asymptomatic Polyvascular Abnormalities Community study (APAC) (13.2%; n = 5440, age ≥40 years)43, but higher than the prevalence reported among Caucasians in the Barcelona-Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis (Barcelona-AsIA) study (8.6%; n = 933, mean age of 66.3 years)44. These two studies measured however ICAS through transcranial Doppler.

Several studies have found that age is a major risk factor for SVD markers and ICAS17,45. Although the participants of the present study were relatively young (55–65 years), we found clear correlations of age with WMH and CMB. With respect to cardiovascular risk factors, we found, in accordance with other studies, that hypertension was associated with increased prevalence of all the SVD markers and ICAS33,45. The main clinical manifestation of SVD is vascular cognitive impairment46. However, no statistically significant positive association was found between SVD and MMSE score in the present study. One possible explanation for the lack of association is the relatively young age of the present study population and the relatively high proportion of less educated individuals, especially among females.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first population-based study estimating the prevalence and correlates of incidental findings on brain MRI in a rural Chinese population. The major strengths of our study include the high response rate, which guarantees a good representativeness of the findings, the use of high-resolution MRI, and the careful evaluation of the imaging markers. Our study has also some limitations. First, the evaluation of cognitive function using MMSE is not sensitive. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale has therefore now been added to the phase II of the TIS study. Second, we only included people at the age of 55 to 65 years, whether or not these findings may apply to older people remains unknown. However, as we are currently expanding the TIS study and following all study participants longitudinally, we will be able to assess the prevalence of brain MRI incidental findings and their correlates above age 65, as well as to better assess the relationships of these incidental findings to cognitive impairment and dementia in the near future. Multiple follow-up procedures have now been established for the TIS study. First, the village doctors of the two villages are asked to document all health service use, hospitalization, and death of the participants in detail. These documents are reviewed by trained data collectors of the TIS study annually. Second, all participants are contacted every two years by phone or in person to provide information about new disorders occurring since the last contact. Finally, we also acquire mortality and medical insurance data for all the participants from the local Bureau of Public Security and Bureau of Social Security of Taizhou once a year. All data are collected and verified by trained data collectors of the TIS study. To obtain detailed information on the clinical characteristics of specific disorders, we will also review relevant medical records from the Taizhou People’s Hospital and Taixing People’s Hospital, two major hospitals in Taixing.

In conclusion, we revealed a high prevalence of MRI incidental findings in a rural Chinese population at the age of 55–65 years. The high prevalence of these findings urges for development of preventative strategy to reduce future burden of aging-related diseases, such as stroke and dementia, in Chinese elderly population.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (52.1KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank all study individuals for their participation, and appreciate the contributions on reading the MRI image by Weijun Tang and He Wang. The project was supported by the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (grant number: 2014DFA32830), the Key Research and Development Plans of Jiangsu Province (grant number: BE2016726), the key basic research grants from Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (grant number: 16JC1400500), the Karolinska Institutet (Senior Researcher Award and Strategic Research Area in Epidemiology), and the National Key Research and Development program of China (grant number: 2017YFC0907002, 2017YFC0907501).

Author Contributions

W.Y., L.J., X.W. and X.C. conceived the Taizhou Imaging Study and take responsibility for its all aspects. S.L. and F.F. wrote the manuscript, with further contributions from M.C., Y.J., Y.W., Q.Y., X.C. and W.Y. S.L. and Y.J. completed all the statistical analysis supported by F.F. and W.Y. Z.Y. led the data collection supported by X.K., W.T. M.F. and J.C. F.X., J.W. and M.L. reviewed and commented on the data analysis and drafts. All authors interpreted data, contributed to critical revisions, and approved the final version of the article.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Shuyuan Li and Fang Fang contributed equally.

Li Jin and Weimin Ye jointly supervised this work.

Contributor Information

Xiaofeng Wang, Email: xiaofengwang71@163.com.

Xingdong Chen, Email: xingdongchen@fudan.edu.cn.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-36893-0.

References

  • 1.Wang Z, Hu S, Sang S, Luo L, Yu C. Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Stroke Mortality in China: Data From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Stroke. 2017;48:271. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chan KY, et al. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia in China, 1990-2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;381:2016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60221-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pantoni L, Garcia JH. Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis - A review. Stroke. 1997;28:652. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.28.3.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fazekas F, et al. Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology. 1993;43:1683. doi: 10.1212/WNL.43.9.1683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ikram MA, et al. The Rotterdam Scan Study: design update 2016 and main findings. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30:1299. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0105-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Splansky GL, et al. The Third Generation Cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study: design, recruitment, and initial examination. AM J EPIDEMIOL. 2007;165:1328. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol129 687 (1989). [PubMed]
  • 8.Miller KL, et al. Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1523. doi: 10.1038/nn.4393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bamberg F, et al. Whole-Body MR Imaging in the German National Cohort: Rationale, Design, and Technical Background. Radiology. 2015;277:206. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pantoni L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:689. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70104-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prins ND, et al. Cerebral small-vessel disease and decline in information processing speed, executive function and memory. Brain. 2005;128:2034. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Au R, et al. Association of white matter hyperintensity volume with decreased cognitive functioning - The Framingham Heart Study. Archives Of Neurology. 2006;63:246. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.2.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vermeer SE, et al. Silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions increase stroke risk in the general population - The Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2003;34:1126. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000068408.82115.D2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Debette S, et al. Association of MRI Markers of Vascular Brain Injury With Incident Stroke, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and Mortality The Framingham Offspring Study. Stroke. 2010;41:600. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.570044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bernick C, et al. Silent MRI infarcts and the risk of future stroke - The cardiovascular health study. Neurology. 2001;57:1222. doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.7.1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gorelick PB, et al. Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:2672. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182299496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith EE, et al. Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Silent Cerebrovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48:E44. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haberg, A. K. et al. Incidental Intracranial Findings and Their Clinical Impact; The HUNT MRI Study in a General Population of 1006 Participants between 50-66 Years. Plos One11 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Das RR, et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Silent Cerebral Infarcts in the Framingham Offspring Study. Stroke. 2008;39:2929. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vernooij MW, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1821. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wong A, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment: One Cutoff Never Fits All. Stroke. 2015;46:3547. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mok V, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound for screening cerebral small vessel disease: a community study. Stroke. 2012;43:2791. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.665711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Su N, et al. Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Burden Is Associated with Motor Performance of Lower and Upper Extremities in Community-Dwelling Populations. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:313. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mok V, et al. Race-ethnicity and cerebral small vessel disease - Comparison between Chinese and White populations. Int J Stroke. 2014;9A100:36. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang, X. et al. Rationales, design and recruitment of the Taizhou Longitudinal Study. Bmc Public Health9 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Wardlaw JM, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:822. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1987;149:351. doi: 10.2214/ajr.149.2.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MZ. A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:643. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kornienko, V. N. & Pronin, I. N. Diagnostic neuroradiology, 1 ed. (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009).
  • 30.Pantoni L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:689. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70104-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fanning JP, Wong AA, Fraser JF. The epidemiology of silent brain infarction: a systematic review of population-based cohorts. Bmc Med. 2014;12:119. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0119-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Smith EE, et al. Early cerebral small vessel disease and brain volume, cognition, and gait. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:251. doi: 10.1002/ana.24320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hilal S, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and consequences of cerebral small vessel diseases: data from three Asian countries. J Neurol Neurosur Ps. 2017;88:669. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schmidt R, et al. Heterogeneity in age-related white matter changes. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122:171. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0851-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Poels MMF, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cerebral Microbleeds An Update of the Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2010;411:S103. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Romero JR, et al. Risk factors, stroke prevention treatments, and prevalence of cerebral microbleeds in the Framingham Heart Study. Stroke. 2014;45:1492. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sveinbjornsdottir S, et al. Cerebral microbleeds in the population based AGES-Reykjavik study: prevalence and location. j neurol neurosurg psychiatry. 2008;79:1002. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.121913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ding J, et al. Large Perivascular Spaces Visible on Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Progression, and Risk of Dementia The Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. Jama Neurol. 2017;74:1105. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gutierrez J, et al. Brain Perivascular Spaces as Biomarkers of Vascular Risk: Results from the Northern Manhattan Study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:862. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Heier LA, et al. Large Virchow-Robin spaces: MR-clinical correlation. Ajnr Am J Neuroradiol. 1989;10:929. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Husoy AK, et al. Perivascular spaces and headache: A population-based imaging study (HUNT-MRI) Cephalalgia. 2016;36:232. doi: 10.1177/0333102415587691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huang YN, et al. Vascular lesions in Chinese patients with transient ischemic attacks. Neurology. 1997;48:524. doi: 10.1212/WNL.48.2.524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in a community-based population of Chinese adults. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:1479. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lopez-Cancio E, et al. The Barcelona-Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis (AsIA) study: prevalence and risk factors. Atherosclerosis. 2012;221:221. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Suri MF, Johnston SC. Epidemiology of intracranial stenosis. J Neuroimaging. 2009;19(Suppl 1):11S. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Poggesi A, et al. 2001–2011: A Decade of the LADIS (Leukoaraiosis And DISability) Study: What Have We Learned about White Matter Changes and Small-Vessel Disease? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32:577. doi: 10.1159/000334498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information (52.1KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES