An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A
.gov website belongs to an official
government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you've safely
connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
information only on official, secure websites.
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:
PMC Disclaimer
|
PMC Copyright Notice
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
S1–S3 Figs are incorrect. S1 Fig should be the 2D gels of maize embryos. The images for S2 and S3 Figs were incorrectly duplicate. Please see the corrected S1–S3 Figs below.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Comparison of 2DE protein profiles of maize embryo proteins extracted using two methods.
Shown were two independent experiments. Left panel: the modified TCA/acetone precipitation. Right panel: the classical TCA/acetone precipitation. Spots with increased abundance are indicated in red. About 800 μg of proteins were resolved in pH 4–7 (linear) strip by IEF and then in 12.5% gel by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were visualized using CBB.
S2 Fig. Comparison of 2DE protein profiles of maize root proteins extracted using two methods.
Shown were three independent experiments. Left panel: the modified TCA/acetone precipitation. Right panel: the classical TCA/acetone precipitation. Spots with increased abundance are indicated in red. About 800 μg of proteins were resolved in pH 4–7 (linear) strip by IEF and then in 12.5% gel by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were visualized using CBB.
S3 Fig. Comparison of 2DE protein profiles of maize leaf proteins extracted using two methods.
Shown were three independent experiments. Left panel: the modified TCA/acetone precipitation. Right panel: the classical TCA/acetone precipitation. Spots with increased abundance are indicated in red. About 800 μg of proteins were resolved in pH 4–7 (linear) strip by IEF and then in 12.5% gel by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were visualized using CBB.
1.Niu L, Zhang H, Wu Z, Wang Y, Liu H, Wu X, et al. (2018) Modified TCA/acetone precipitation of plant proteins for proteomic analysis. PLoS ONE
13(12): e0202238
10.1371/journal.pone.0202238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
S1 Fig. Comparison of 2DE protein profiles of maize embryo proteins extracted using two methods.
Shown were two independent experiments. Left panel: the modified TCA/acetone precipitation. Right panel: the classical TCA/acetone precipitation. Spots with increased abundance are indicated in red. About 800 μg of proteins were resolved in pH 4–7 (linear) strip by IEF and then in 12.5% gel by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were visualized using CBB.
S2 Fig. Comparison of 2DE protein profiles of maize root proteins extracted using two methods.
Shown were three independent experiments. Left panel: the modified TCA/acetone precipitation. Right panel: the classical TCA/acetone precipitation. Spots with increased abundance are indicated in red. About 800 μg of proteins were resolved in pH 4–7 (linear) strip by IEF and then in 12.5% gel by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were visualized using CBB.
S3 Fig. Comparison of 2DE protein profiles of maize leaf proteins extracted using two methods.
Shown were three independent experiments. Left panel: the modified TCA/acetone precipitation. Right panel: the classical TCA/acetone precipitation. Spots with increased abundance are indicated in red. About 800 μg of proteins were resolved in pH 4–7 (linear) strip by IEF and then in 12.5% gel by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were visualized using CBB.