Skip to main content
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics logoLink to Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
. 2019 Jan 3;16(1):1–19. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20108

The Functional Role of Prostate Cancer Metastasis-related Micro-RNAs

ULRICH H WEIDLE 1, ALEXANDRA EPP 1, FABIAN BIRZELE 2, ULRICH BRINKMANN 1
PMCID: PMC6348398  PMID: 30587496

Abstract

The mortality of patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer can be ascribed to a large degree to metastasis to distant organs, predominantly to the bones. In this review, we discuss the contribution of micro-RNAs (miRs) to the metastatic process of prostate cancer. The criteria for selection of miRs for this review were the availability of preclinical in vivo metastasis-related data in conjunction with prognostic clinical data. Depending on their function in the metastatic process, the corresponding miRs are up- or down-regulated in prostate cancer tissues when compared to matching normal tissues. Up-regulated miRs preferentially target suppressors of cytokine signaling or tumor suppressor-related genes and metastasis-inhibitory transcription factors. Down-regulated miRs promote epithelial–mesenchymal transition or mesenchymal–epithelial transition and diverse pro-metastatic signaling pathways. Some of the discussed miRs exert their function by simultaneously targeting epigenetic pathways as well as cell-cycle-related, anti-apoptotic and signaling-promoting targets. Finally, we discuss potential therapeutic options for the treatment of prostate cancer-related metastases by substitution or inhibition of miRs.

Keywords: In vivo metastasis models, interference with signaling networks, miR substitution and inhibition, prognostic aspects, prometastatic pathways, target validation, review


In 2017, 160,000 new cases of prostate cancer (PC) were diagnosed in the US and an equal number in the EU with 27,000 patients dying due to metastatic PC in the US and the EU (1). Localized disease can be potentially cured by therapies such as surgery and radiation, but in some patients, the disease progresses despite these therapies (2). Androgen-deprivation therapy leads to long-lasting responses between 2 and 3 years, however the disease inevitably progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) that is associated with metastatic disease and poor prognosis. Over the past 5 years, five drugs have been approved for treatment of CRPC (2). These are cabazitaxel, a taxane-based cytostatic; radium 223, an α-emitter; enzalutamide, a small-molecule androgen receptor (AR) antagonist; abiraterone, a blocker of de novo synthesis of androgens; and Sipuleucel, a dendritic cell-based immunotherapy (3).

The recent genetic classification of PC has revealed seven subtypes and new molecular targets for molecular intervention such as v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 homolog (ETS) family transcription factor-based fusion proteins as well as mutations in speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP), forkhead protein A1 (FOXA1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) (4). The serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 1 (SPINK), which is up-regulated in ETS-rearrangement-negative tumors, is also being pursued as a new target for treatment of CRPC (5). Nucleic acid-based therapy is another approach for treatment of CRPC. Custirsen, a second-generation phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide targeting clusterin mRNA is presently undergoing phase III clinical studies in combination with chemotherapy in patients with CRPC (6,7). Clusterin is up-regulated in patients with CRPC and functions as an ATP-independent molecular chaperone with anti-apoptotic function through inhibition of pro-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma virus-associated X (BAX) by altering its conformation (6,7). In this review, we focus on micro-RNAs (miRs), another class of targets for nucleic acid-based therapy, their role in PC metastasis, and their potential function as therapeutic targets. We exclusively discuss miRs validated by in vitro and in vivo preclinical experiments and exclude those which are in earlier stages of preclinical development.

Process of PC Metastasis

PC metastasis can be dissected into several functional steps (8-12). The metastatic process starts with cancer cells at the tumor edge undergoing epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) associated with acquiring invasive properties, intravasation as single cells or multicellular aggregates, activation of survival programs, protection against attack by immune cells and finally extravasation and colonization of distant organs with a high preference for bone (12). Stromal-derived factor 1/C-X-C receptor 4 (SDF1/CXCR4) interactions are a prerequisite for bone tropism of PC cells and for access to metastatic niches in the bone marrow (13). The disseminated tumor cells undergo bi-directional interactions with bone-forming cells (osteoblasts), bone-degrading cells (osteoclasts) and other cells in the tumor microenvironment. The metastatic niche is populated by androgen-independent and chemotherapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are supported by mesenchymal cells with respect to growth and survival, while CSCs contribute to recruitment of cancer-associated fibroblasts (14). Furthermore, angiogenesis is essential for the outgrowth of bone metastases. Osteoblastic, osteoclastic and mixed lesions have been identified as PC-related metastases due to the imbalance of osteoblast-mediated bone formation and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption (9,10). Very often, bone metastases display both osteoblastic and osteolytic elements.

An essential component of bone destruction and osteolytic metastasis is the axis formed by the receptor activator of nuclear factor-ĸB (NFĸB)/receptor activator of NFĸB (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin OPG) and members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)/tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily (9,11).Tumor cell-secreted parathyroid hormone, parathyroid hormone-related protein, interleukin1 (IL-1), IL-6 and RANKL mediate activation of osteoclasts and thus facilitate bone destruction (9,11). RANK/RANKL interactions result in the activation of NFĸB signaling and stimulate final effectors of osteolysis such as carboanhydrase II, H+ ATPase and cathepsin K. A vicious cycle is initiated during which osteolysis factors such as transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and Ca2+ are released, which promote tumor cell proliferation and production of parathyroid hormone-related protein. Osteoblastic metastases are stimulated by factors, which promote osteoblast activity such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF), RANKL, platelet-derived growth factor, IGF1, and endothelin 1 (9,11). TGFβ is activated from latent TGFβ; IGF1 can be released from inhibitory IGF binding proteins; and the osteolytic factor parathyroid hormone-related protein can be inactivated by proteases such as urokinase (9). Bone metastasis is associated with skeleton-related events such as intractable pain, bone fractions, spinal cord suppression, neurological deficits and paralysis (15).

Micro RNAs

miRs are small noncoding RNAs with a length between 18 and 25 nucleotides. They are transcribed in the nucleus as primary pre-miRs that are capped, spliced and polyadenylated. Thirty percent of miRs are processed from introns of protein-coding genes, the others are encoded by dedicated loci (16-18). Primary pre-miRs are cleaved by a complex called the microprocessor to 60- to 70-nucleotide hair-pin looped pre-miRs, which are exported to the cytoplasm by exportin 5 and subsequently are processed by multi-protein complex DICER to produce mature miRs. One strand of the mature miR (guide strand) is loaded into the miR-induced silencing complex to target mRNA by sequence complementarity. This interaction results in gene suppression by targeted mRNA degradation or translational repression in processing bodies (18). More than 1,000 miR genes have been identified and a single miR can target hundreds to thousands of mRNAs, while a single gene can be targeted by multiple miRs (19). Therefore, miRs can function as regulators of complex signaling networks.

The importance of miRs in cancer was demonstrated by correlating the deletion of miR15/miR16 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and its induction in a mouse model by deletion of miR15/miR16 (20). Furthermore, miRs are involved in pro-oncogenic and tumor-suppressive pathways in a context-dependant manner (21). The crucial role of miRs in metastasis has been demonstrated for breast cancer (22,23), ovarian cancer (24), colorectal cancer (25), and hepatocellular carcinoma (26). Here, we focus on the role of specific miRs involved in the metastatic process of PC.

Prostate Cancer Cell Lines and In Vivo Models

In this review, we describe PC metastasis related miRs which have been validated in at least one in vivo model. We excluded miRs with metastasis-related prognostic impact, but lacking in vivo validation in a PC-related metastasis model.

Several subtypes of PC such as adenocarcinoma, transitional cell, squamous cell and small cell carcinoma (neuroendocrine) have been described (27). The most abundant subtype is prostate adenocarcinoma (≥90%) and consequently most PC cell lines used for in vitro and in vivo studies correspond to this phenotype. The most commonly used PC cell lines are DU-145, PC3, LNCaP, C42B, LAPC4, VCaP and 22Rv as well as BPH1, PIN, RWE-1,2 as immortalized prostate cells. The generation and functional characterization of these cell lines is described in detail in (28). For functional in vivo metastasis-related studies, several standard in vivo models are used (28-30). Hematogenous metastasis-mimicking models are based on either the injection of PC cells into the tail vein of mice and monitoring the development of lung metastases, or on intracardiac tumor cell inoculation and following-up of their metastasis to distant organs. Spontaneous metastasis can be assessed by subcutaneous implantation or by orthotopic prostatic implantation. Injection of PC cells into the bones mimics the growth of PC cells in the bone microenvironment, but is not a model of metastasis per se (28,29). Vossicle models are based on implantation of vertebrae from transgenic mice together with PC cells into athymic mice to study the effects of genetic alterations in the tumor microenvironment on tumor development and metastasis (28,29). The transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model was developed as the first in vivo transgenic model with spontaneous PC metastasis (30,31). In this model, SV40 large T-antigen is expressed in prostate cells under the control of the rat probasin promoter. Metastasis to the lymph nodes, the lungs and occasionally to the kidney, adrenal glands and bones has been observed in this model.

miRs Promoting PC Metastasis

SOCS-targeting miRs (miR-9, miR-194, miR-210). miR-9 is up-regulated in 75% of patients with PC in comparison to corresponding normal tissues (33) and Figure 1. miR-9 promoted the growth and invasion of the PC cell line M12. Subcutaneously injected M12 cells expressing a miR-9 sponge showed reduced tumor growth. Intraprostatic injection of miR-9 sponge expressing M12 cells revealed no metastatic sites in contrast to the control cell line (33). Cadherin 1 (CDH1) and SOCS5 were identified as direct targets of miR-9 (33). Cleavage of CDH1 leads to accumulation of β-catenin in the nucleus, driving transcription of survival factors such as c-MYC and cyclin D1 (34). c-MYC induces additional miR-9. The second miR-9 target, SOCS5, prevents phosphorylation of Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) (35) (Figure 2A).

Figure 1. Steady-state levels of miR-143, miR-210, miR-9 and miR-96 in prostate cancer and corresponding normal tissues. A total of 52 matched normal prostate and 495 prostate tumor samples were investigated. Expression as measured by RNA sequencing in The Cancer Genome Atlas prostate adenocarcinoma cohort are shown as log2 Normalized Read Count values as provided by Broad’s FIREHOSE service. Expression data are shown as box plots where the black line represents the median value and the black rectangles indicate the upper and lower 25% quartiles. Therefore, 50% of all data points are included in the black rectangle. All other data points, except for outliers, are located within the upper and lower whiskers.

Figure 1

Figure 2. miRs up-regulated in metastatic prostate cancer: A: miR-194 and miR-9; B: miR-210-3p and miR-96. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) 1, 2, 5 are direct targets of miR-210-3p, miR-194 and miR-96. Other direct targets are cadherin 1 (CDH1), TNFα-induced protein 3-interacting protein (TNIP1), forkhead box 1 (FOXO1), ETS variant 6 (ETV6) and AKT8 viral oncogene cellular homolog (AKT). Inhibition of these targets by the corresponding miRs results in activation of pro-invasive genes. AR: Androgen receptor; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK: extracellular-regulated kinase; FLT3: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; JAK1: Janus kinase 1; mTOR: mechanistic target of rapamycin; NFĸB: nuclear factor ĸB; p65: protein 65; STAT: signal transducer and activator of transcription factor; TGFβ: transforming growth factor β.

Figure 2

Serum levels of miR-194 are higher in men with CRPC than those in men with localized disease (36). miR-194 is induced by transcription factor GATA binding protein 2 (37,38) and PC3 cells ectopically expressing miR-194 showed significantly enhanced cell invasion in the chorionic allantoic membrane assay and exhibited spontaneous metastasis to visceral organs such as kidney, lung, liver and spleen, whereas control PC3 cells remained contained in the prostate (36). SOCS2, a ubiquitin ligase, was identified as a direct target of miR-194 (36). Inhibition of SOCS2 induced expression of pro-metastatic genes such as Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and JAK1 through activation of extracellular regulated kinase (ERK)-and STAT3 signaling (39,40) (Figure 2A).

miR-210-3p is elevated in PC, particularly in bone-metastatic PC, and promoted EMT after transfection into VCaP and C42B PC cells (41) and Figure 1. Silencing of miR-210p in PC3 cells reduced tumor burden and metastatic sites in bone after intracardial injection (41). miR-210-3p activated NF-ĸB signaling and the expression of metastasis-related genes such as twist family bHLH transcription factor 1 (TWIST1), matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) and IL11 (41). The molecular basis for activation of NFĸB signaling is the direct inactivation of SOCS1 and TNFα-induced protein 3 interacting protein 1 (TNIP1), both inhibitors of NFĸB signaling (42-44). SOCS1 suppresses NFĸB signaling by binding to DNA-bound p65 and induces its degradation (45). TNIP1 suppresses NFĸB signaling through deubiquitinylation of NFĸB essential modulator (44) (Figure 2B).

miRs targeting tumor-suppressor genes (miR-96, miR-154, miR-379 and miR-409). Several observations have demonstrated the involvement of miR-96 in PC invasion and metastasis. miR-96 is transcriptionally regulated through nuclear epidermal growth factor (EGFR) and directly targets tumor-suppressor transcription factor ETS variant 6 (ETV6) (46-49). In several hematological malignancies, ETV6 is inactivated by a mutation (50). ETV6 is inversely correlated with EGFR–miR-96 signaling in clinical samples. A reduction of metastasis to the brain and bone has been observed after cardiac injection of RasB1 PC cells ectopically expressing ETV6 (46). Furthermore, miR-96 directly targets forkhead box O1 (FOXO1), a tumor-suppressive transcription factor (50). FOXO1 enhances apoptosis, reduces proliferation and inhibits androgen-dependent and -independent activity of AR (51-54). In addition, it has been shown that TGFβ induces miR-96 through SMAD family-dependent transcription and inactivation of AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 substrate 1 (AKT1S1) mRNA, a negative regulator of miR-96 (55). miR-96 was shown to promote bone metastasis in a PC model (55) (Figure 2B). In addition, dose-dependent regulation of hypoxia-induced autophagy by miR-96 has been documented (56). miR-96 was found to be up-regulated in PC samples in comparison to matched normal prostate tissues (Figure 1).

Delta-like1 homolog deiodinase iodothyronine 3 (DLK-DIO3) cluster-related miRs miR-409-3p, miR-5p, miR-154* and miR-379 are activated in embryonic stem cells (57). miR409-3p and miR-409-5p were found to be activated in PC with high Gleason scores and expression levels of miR-409-3p correlated with disease-free survival (57,58). miR-154* and miR-379 were also found to be highly expressed in PC and miR-379 expression correlated with progression-free survival in patients. miRs of this cluster share a couple of common functional features with subtle differences which are not discussed in detail here. Functional studies have identified them as mediators of EMT-related changes of PC cells towards spindle-shaped cells, reduced expression of E-cadherin and increased expression of vimentin (57,58). Ectopic expression of miR-409-3p/5p in the prostate gland transformed normal prostate epithelial cells, and promoted tumorigenicity, EMT and stemness in vivo (58). Mice inoculated intracardially with metastatic ARCaP cells had 100% incidence of bone metastasis, whereas in mice bearing cells transfected with a miR-409-3p/5p inhibitor did not develop metastases within 15 weeks. Similarly, inhibitors of miR-154* reduced bone and soft-tissue metastases in the ARCaP model (58). Several tumor-suppressor genes are inhibited by miRs of this cluster: stromal antigen 2 (STAG2) (59,60), ras suppressor protein 1 (RSU1) (61), retinoblastoma like 2 (RBL2) (62), nitrogen permease regulator like 2 (NPRL2) (63), polyhomeotic homolog 3 (PHC3), a polycomb group protein (64), von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor, an E3 ubiquitin ligase (65) and SMAD7, a signal transducer of TGFβ signaling (66). Several pro-metastatic pathways are activated: hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α) through inhibition of its tumor suppressor E3 ubiquitin ligase function (65), inhibition of NPRL2 activates RAS and AKT signaling (63), RBL2 degradation induces the E2F pathway (62), deactivation of STAG2 promotes aneuploidy (59,60) and several miRs of the cluster promote activation of polycomb proteins and osteoblastic pathways (57). The mode of action of miR-154, miR-379, miR-409-3p and miR-409-5p are summarized in Figure 3.

Figure 3. miR-154*, miR-379, miR-409-3p and miR-405-5p target tumor suppressor genes. These miRs are up-regulated in metastatic prostate cancer and inactivation of tumor suppressor-related mRNAs results in the activation of pro-invasive genes. NRPL2: Nitrogen permease regulatorlike 2; PHC3: polyhomeotic homolog 3; RBL2: retinoblastoma-like 2; RSU1: RAS suppressor protein 1; STAG2: stromal antigen 2, VHL: von Hippel Lindau gene.

Figure 3

Targeting of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1) by miR-296-3p. Clinical tissue microarrays have revealed frequent up-regulation of miR-296-3p in PC patients and concomitant down-regulation of ICAM1 (67). Knock-down of miR-296-3p in M12 PC cells reduced pulmonary metastasis in a model of experimental metastasis in nude mice (22). miR-296-3p inhibits ICAM1 by directly targeting its 3UTR and is pivotal for the metastasis of PC9 cells to the lungs, probably by enhancing survival of circulating tumor cells by mediating resistance to natural killer (NK) cells (67). The described in vivo effects were abolished by a natural killer cell-eliminating anti-sialo GM1 antibody (67). ICAM1 has been identified as a co-stimulator of natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity (68,69).

AR as a target of miR-301a. miR-301a is a predictor of PC metastasis, which is induced in tumor cells by adipocytes (70). It was shown that PC recruits more adipocytes than normal prostate tissues and in vitro enhanced pre-adipocyte recruitment increases PC cell invasion (70). Overexpression of miR-301a enhanced lung metastasis of LNCaP and PC3 cells after subcutaneous implantation into nude mice (70). Orthotopically engrafted PC CWR22Rv-1 cells gave rise to increased metastatic foci when co-implanted with immortalized pre-adipocytes. Mechanistically, the observed effects were due to the inhibition of AR by miR-301 in tumor cells (70). AR has been identified as a negative regulator of TGFβ/SMAD/MMP9 signaling (71-75).

miRs Inhibiting PC Metastasis

miR-34a and miR-383 target CD44. It has been shown that PC stem cells express CD44 and confer tumorigenic properties on these cells (76,77). CD44 has been identified as a direct target of miR-34a and miR-383 in PC cells (78,79) (Figure 4). In addition, miR-373, miR-520c and miR-708 were shown to target CD44 and modulate in vitro-invasion of PC cells (80,81). miR-34a inhibited clonal and clonogenic properties of PC cells (78). Tail vein injection of miR-34a into nude mice with orthotopic LAPC9 tumors inhibited lung metastasis and extended the survival of the animals without affecting tumor growth (78). Ectopic expression of miR-383 suppressed the tumorigenicity of DU145, PC3 and LNCaP PC cell lines, while silencing of miR-383 induced tumorigenicity of normal prostate epithelial cells (78). miR-383 inhibited the capacity of CD44+ PC cells to initiate tumors, and its ectopic expression in PC3-3M cells tagged with luciferase suppressed growth of xenografts in vivo (78). Inoculation of these cells expressing miR-383 ectopically into the left ventricles of nude mice reduced metastasis (78). Thus, CD44 is a crucial mediator of metastasis (82). Low expression of miR-383 is associated with poor survival outcome in patients with PC and an inverse correlation of expression of miR-383 in PC tissues and lymph node metastasis has been found (78).

Figure 4. Overview of miRs down-regulated in metastatic prostate cancer targeting mRNAs exerting different functions. These miRs include miR-23b, miR-27b, miR-34, miR-188-5p, miR-195, miR-384, miR-466,miR-503 and miR-708. AKT: AKT8 viral oncogene cellular homolog; ANG: angiopoietin; BCOX (KIAA0100): breast cancer overexpressed gene 1; CD44: cluster of differentiation 44; FAK: focal adhesion kinase; HIP1R: Huntington-interacting protein 1-related protein; KPNA4: karyopherin 4; LAPTM4B: lysosome transmembrane protein 4; NFĸB: nuclear factor ĸB; OPN: osteopontin; OSC: osteocalcin; p53: protein 53; RNF-31: ring finger protein 31; RTK: receptor tyrosine kinase; RUNX2: RUNT-related transcription factor; TNF: tumor necrosis factor.

Figure 4

miR-573 targets FGF receptor R1 and attenuates EMT. miR-573 is down-regulated in PC and its expression levels inversely correlate with survival (83). miR-573 is induced by transcription factor GATA-binding protein 3, a key factor in preventing PC progression through antagonizing AKT signaling (84). miR-573 suppressed migration and invasion of VCaP and PC3 PC cell lines (83). VCaP transfected with miR-573 gave rise to significantly fewer lung metastases compared to control cells after implantation into the dorsal flank of immuno-deficient mice (83). FGFR1 was identified as a direct target of miR-573 (83). FGFR1 is a mediator of EMT and an activator of downstream signaling pathways such as AKT, SMAD2, SMAD3 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (85) (Figure 5). An inverse correlation between expression levels of miR-573 and FGFR1 has been found in prostate tumors (83).

Figure 5. miR-130b, miR-143, miR-145, miR-200b and miR-573 mediate epithelial–mesenchymal transition or mesenchymal–epithelial transition. These miRs are down-regulated in metastatic prostate cancer and cause epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) or mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET). AKT: AKT8 viral oncogene cellular homolog; ADAM 17: a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 17; platelet-derived growth factor D; ERK: extracellularregulated kinase; FGFR1: fibroblast growth factor receptor-1; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; p38: p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase.

Figure 5

miR-143 and miR-145 induce mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET). Down-regulation of miR-143 and miR-145 is associated with tumor progression and metastasis (86). miR-143 and miR-145 were shown to induce transdifferentiation of mesenchymal cells towards epithelial cells (86). As shown with miR-transfected PC3 cells, both miR-143 and miR-145 inhibited growth of tibial injected cells and reduce the size of skeletal lesions (1). miR-143 can interfere with extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling, which is involved in the MET pathway (87,88), and miR-145 has been shown to target MMP11, and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase17 (ADAM17) (89) (Figure 5). miR-143 is down-regulated in prostate tumors when compared with matching normal prostate tissues (Figure 1).

miR-200b attenuates EMT. miR-200 was up-regulated by AR and reversed EMT in PC3 cells (90). miR-200 induced an increase in expression of differentiation markers of prostate epithelium such as cytokeratins CK8 and CK18, suppressed mesenchymal features such as zinc finger and homeobox transcription factor1 (ZEB1) and reduced invasion of PC3 cells in vitro (90). Transfection of PC3 cells with miR-200b suppressed growth and angiogenesis of PC3 xenografts (90). Orthotopic injection of these cells dramatically reduced spontaneous metastasis as assessed by monitoring fluoresence. miR-200b also inhibited platelet-derived growth factor-D in PC3 cells (91) (Figure 5). From a mechanistic point of view, the direct targets of miR-200b need to be identified in further detail.

miR-130b targets MMP2. miR-130b is down-regulated in clinical PC specimens (92). Stable expression of miR-130b in M12 PC cells suppressed migration and invasion in wound-healing assays without affecting proliferation. Intracardiac injection of luciferase-tagged PC3 cells reduced tissue metastasis, as detected by bioluminescence. MMP2 was identified as a direct target of miR-130b (92) and acts as a promoter of metastasis through degradation of the extracellular matrix (93) (Figure 5).

miR-449a targets prostate leucine zipper gene (PrLZ). Down-regulation of miR-449 is related to PC clinical stage and distant metastasis (94). miR-449a suppressed proliferation, promoted apoptosis and restricted invasion and tube formation by LNCaP and PC3 cells (94). miR-449 suppressed tumor formation of subcutaneously implanted transfected PC3 cells and reduced the number of animals with tumor metastases (94). PrLZ has been identified as a direct target of miR-449. PrLZ is a member of the tumor protein D52 (TPD52) family, which is specifically expressed in prostate tumors and is associated with progression of PC (95-97).

miRs Interfering with Signaling

miR-25 targets integrin components. miR-25 was down-regulated in aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)-positive normal and transformed PC stem cells and steadily increased upon luminal differentiation (98). ALDH is a functional marker of CSCs and progenitors (99). miR-25 overexpression reduced integrin αv and integrin α6 in human PC cell lines and PC stem cells (98) (Figure 6). Integrins αv and α6 have been identified as pro-invasive integrins (100,101). In PC stem cells, miR-25 affected morphology and reduced migration, switching them to a less invasive phenotype due to cytoskeletal reorganization (98). The impact of miR-25 on metastasis was monitored by injecting fluorescently labeled miR-25 expressing PC3 cells into the circulatory system of embryonic zebrafish (98,102). It was found that miR-25 disrupted extravasation and colonization of distant sites in vivo (98).

Figure 6. miR-1, miR-16, miR-23a, miR-25, miR-27a and miR-101 interfere with cellular signaling mechanisms. These miRs are down-regulated in metastatic prostate cancer and target mRNAs which promote invasion. BCL2: B-Cell lymphoma 2, CDK: cyclin-dependent kinase; CENPF: centromer protein F precursor; Cofilin-P: phosphorylated cofilin; NR2F2: nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group F, member 2; FOXM1: forkhead box M1; INT: integrin; LIMK1: LIM kinase 1; PAK6: p21-activated kinase 6; SRC: tyrosine kinase SRC.

Figure 6

miR-1 targets v-src sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (SRC). miR-1 is reduced in PC compared with benign tissue and its expression further decreases with metastatic progression (103-105). miR-1 was induced by AR and inhibits in vitro proliferation and in vivo growth of RASB1 cells, a cell line derived from experimental bone metastases of DU145 PC cells expressing mutated RAS V12G37 (103,106). SRC was identified as a direct target of miR-1 (103) (Figure 6). Bone and brain metastases of RASB1 cells transfected with miR-1 were evaluated after intracardiac inoculation. Developing metastases were delayed in time from 3 weeks to 10 weeks, diminished in size and mainly found in the brain. Expression of SRC in miR-1-expressing RASB1 cells restored metastatic ability. Furthermore, it was shown that EGFR promotes PC bone metastases by down-regulating miR-1 and activating the transcription factor TWIST1 (107). In this context, translocation of EGFR into nuclei and increased nuclear EGFR as well as reduced miR-1 expression correlate with worse clinical outcome (107).

miR-16 targets BCL2 and cell-cycle-related genes. miR-16 was identified in a functional screen for miRs which inhibit proliferation of 22Rv1 PC cells (108). Expression of miR-16 was low in the majority of PC clinical samples in comparison to matching normal tissues. miR-16 can induce apoptosis of PC cells by targeting BCL2 by inhibiting the translation of its mRNA (20) (Figure 6). Transfection of PC with miR-16 down-regulated the expression of several cell cycle-related genes such as cyclin D3 as well as cyclin-dependent kinases 1 and 3 (108). In vivo bone metastasis of luciferase-tagged PC3 cells ectopically expressing miR-16 cells was inhibited after intracardiac injection. A miR-16 mimetic complexed to atelocollagen administered i.v. into mice inhibited metastasis into the thorax, jaws and legs, suggesting that systemic delivery of miR-16 could be a novel strategy to inhibit prostate tumor growth in the bones (108).

miR-23a targets p21-activated kinase 6 (PAK6). miR-23a is reduced in PC cell lines and tissues in comparison to controls and low expression is associated with aggressive and poor prognostic PC phenotype (109). miR-23a suppressed invasion and migration of PC3, DU-145 and C4-2B PC cell lines in vitro (109). Intraprostatic injection of luciferase-tagged PC3 cells, transfected with miR-23a gave rise to fewer metastatic lesions as revealed by bioluminescence (109). miR-23a was found to dissolute stress fibers, suppress the formation of actin fibers (109) and inhibit PC cell motility (110,111). PAK6 was identified as a direct target of miR-23a (109) (Figure 6). PAK6 directly phosphorylates LIM kinase 1 (112) and the latter phosphorylates cofilin (113,114), suppressing stress fibers and actin filaments required for cell motility and invasion (110-112).

miR-27b and miR101 target nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group F member 2 (NR2F2) (previously COUP-TFII). miRs-27b and miR-101 directly target NR2F2, a master regulator of the metastatic gene regulatory network and member of the orphan nuclear receptor family, by modulating the expression of transcription factors ZEB1 and ZEB2 (115,116) (Figure 6). Loss of miR-101 correlated with increase in the NR2F2– forkhead box M1 (FOXM1)-centromer protein F precursor (CENPF) signaling activity in clinical data sets (115). FOXM1 is a transcription factor which is overexpressed in PC and contributes to proliferation, angiogenesis and metastasis (117). CENPF is a structural component of the kinetochore and a known target of FOXM1 (118). Both FOXM1 and CENPF levels are increased in metastatic PC (48). In vivo, lymphatic metastasis was promoted in LNCaP cells in which miR-101 and miR-27b were inhibited after injection into mouse prostate (115). Clinical data revealed that loss of function of miR-101 and miR-27b leads to overexpression of NR2F2, FOXM1 and CENPF, and enhancement of metastasis and drug resistance (115).

miRs Targeting Bone-related Targets

miR-466 targets Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2). miR-466 was underexpressed in PC compared to normal tissues and inhibited invasion and migration of PC3 and DU145 PC cells (119). In vivo, PC3 cells constitutively expressing miR-145 exhibited reduced growth of the primary tumor after orthotopic implantation into the posterior prostatic lobe of athymic mice (119). Intracardiac injection of these cells suppressed spontaneous metastases compared to controls. miR-466 directly targets bone-related transcription factor RUNX2, which is involved in expression of several genes related to tumor growth and metastasis, such as osteopontin, osteocalcin, angiopoietins 1 and 4, MMP11, vimentin, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and AKT (120,121) (Figure 4).

Other miR-related Targets

miR-23b and miR-27b target Huntington-interacting protein 1-related protein (HIP1R). miR-23b and miR-27b are encoded by the miR cluster 23b/27b and are down-regulated in CRPC (122). Ectopic expression of miR-23b, -27b in CRPC cell lines ALV31 and PC3 ML reduced mobility and invasion, increased E-cadherin and reduced expression of Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC1), even though the proliferation rate was not altered (122,123). In vivo, orthotopic xenografts of aggressive PC cells transduced with miR-23b and miR-27b were not affected with respect to growth of the primary tumor, however, distant metastases were significantly reduced (123). miR-23b and miR-27b down-regulated HIP1R, a component of clathrin-coated pits and vesicles that may link the endocytic pathway to the actin cytoskeleton (123,124) (Figure 4). HIP1R binds 3-phosphoinosites and may promote survival by stabilizing receptor tyrosine kinases following ligand-induced endocytosis (124).

miR-188-5p targets lysosome transmembrane protein 4 (LAPTM4B). Down-regulation of miR-188-5p is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in PC (125). miR-188-5p inhibited proliferation, invasion and migration of PC3 and LNCaP PC cell lines in vitro (125). Ectopic expression of miR-188-5p inhibited tumor growth and metastasis of PC3 cells implanted into the dorsal flank of nude mice (125). LAPTM4B has been identified as a direct target of miR-188-5p in PC3 and LNCaP cells (125) (Figure 4). LAPTM4B is located in late endosomes and lysosomes and can promote proliferation, invasion and inhibit apoptosis and is able to initiate autophagy (126). LAPTM4B is associated with poor prognosis and metastasis in several types of tumors (127-130).

miR-195 targets breast cancer overexpressed gene 1 (KIAA0100, previously BCOX1). PC patients with low miR-195 expression were found to have a poorer prognosis (131). Restoring miR-195 expression in PC3 and LNCaP cells inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion (131). miR-195 down-regulates BCOX1 (Figure 4, which is associated with the recurrence and progression of triple-negative breast cancer (132,133). BCOX1 is significantly overexpressed in patients with PC and lymph node metastasis and is associated with PC progression (131). miR-195 reduced growth and metastasis of PC3 and LNCaP cells implanted into the dorsal flanks of immunodeficient mice (131).

miR-503 targets ring finger protein 31 (RNF31). miR-503 inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion of PC3 and LNCaP cells in vitro (134) and targets RNF31, also known as HOIL-1 interacting protein (135,136) (Figure 4). RNF31 catalyzes the formation of linear peptide bonds between the amino terminus of methionine and the carboxy-terminal glycine (137). RNF31 promotes degradation of p53 (138) and facilitates NFĸB signaling (139). RNF31 knockdown in PC3 cells attenuated metastasis of these cells implanted subcutaneously into the dorsal flanks of nude mice (134). RNF31-positive staining is associated with PC progression and unfavorable outcome (134).

miR-708 targets karyopherin. miR-708 targets karyopherin (KPNA4) (Figure 4). The expression levels of karyopherin correlate with PC progression. miR-708 inhibited migration of PC3 cells. KPNA4 knockdown attenuated primary tumor invasion of PC3 xenografts as well as bone metastasis (140). Central mediators of karyopherin function are TNFα and TNFβ, which enhance PC cell migration, stimulate osteoclasts and bone resorption (141,142) and can alter macrophage polarization towards the M2 subtype in the tumor microenvironment (143).

miRs with a Multitude of Identified Targets

miR-141 targets CD44, methyltransferase EZH2 and several Rho-GTPases. miR-141 is a member of the miR-200 family and is underexpressed in PC stem/progenitor populations in xenografts and tumors (144). Forced expression of miR-141 in CD44+ and bulk PC cells suppressed tumor regeneration and invasion and enforced an epithelial phenotype with loss of the mesenchymal phenotype (144). miR-141 inhibited invasion in PC3, DU145, VCaP, LAPC4, LNCaP and C4-2 PC cells. Ectopic expression of miR-141 in CD44high PC3 and DU-145 PC cells and implantation into the dorsal prostate of non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice resulted in smaller primary tumors and fewer lung metastases. Doxycycline-inducible expression of miR-141 in LAPC9 xenografts reduced growth of xenografts and diminished metastasis (144). The mechanism of action of miR-141 is based on inhibition of CSC-related molecules, cytoskeleton- and cell-cycle-related components, resulting in inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis. CSC-related targets such as CD44 and histone methyltransferase EZH2, a component of the polycomb repressive complex 2, both involved in CSC maintenance, invasion and metastasis, are direct targets of miR-141 (144,145). In addition, several invasion- and motility-modulating Rho GTPases, such as cell division cycle 42 (CDC42), ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC) and actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5 (ARPC5) have been identified as direct targets of miR-141 (Figure 7). These targets are involved in formation of actin stress fibers and lamellipodia, and cytoskeletal reorganization (146-148). Furthermore, miR-141 inhibited cell-cycle-related molecules such as CDK4 and CDK6. However, it is not yet clear, whether these are direct targets of miR-141

Figure 7. miRs down-regulated in metastatic prostate cancer and targeting several mRNAs simultaneously. The mechanism of action of miR-141 and miR-203 are outlined. API5: Apoptosis-inhibitor protein 5; AREG: amphiregulin; cIAP1: cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1; CCNE1: cyclin E; CD44: cluster of differentiation 44; CDK: cyclin-dependent kinase; DLX5: distal-less homeobox 5; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; EREG: epiregulin; ERK: extracellular-regulated kinase; EZH2: histone methyltransferase EZH2; PRC: polycomb repressor complex; RHO GTPases: RHO guanosine triphosphatase; RAP1: small GTPase RAP1; RUNX2: Runt-related transcription factor 2; SMAD4: transcription factor SMAD4; SRC: tyrosine kinase SRC; SUZ12: core protein of EZH2; TGFα: transforming growth factor α; TRAF: TNF receptor-associated factor; TRIAP1: TP53-regulated inhibitor of apoptosis 1; ZEB1: zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1.

Figure 7

miR-141-3p targets TNF receptor-associated factors (TRAF) 5 and 6. miR-141-3p is an inhibitor of bone metastasis of PC cells and is down-regulated in bone-metastatic PC tissues (149). Intracardiac injection of PC3 cells overexpressing miR-141-3p reduced metastasis to the bones in comparison to controls with fewer metastatic nodules and smaller osteolytic areas of metastatic tumors (149). TRAF5 and TRAF6 were identified as direct targets of miR-141-3p (149). TRAF5 and TRAF6 modulate TNF-induced activation of NFĸB signaling through binding to TNF receptor cytoplasmic domains (150) (Figure 7).

miR-203 inhibits EGFR signaling and anti-apoptotic proteins. miR-203 levels are reduced during progression of PC. Ectopic expression of miR-203 inhibited proliferation, invasion, migration and adhesion of PC cell lines such as DU145, RASB1 and PC3 (151-153). miR-203 induced MET in PC cells with concomitant expression of E-cadherin (153). RASB1 cells ectopically expressing miR-203 exhibited a significant decrease in brain and bone metastases after intracardiac injection (151). In a second in vivo model, miR-203 was shown to inhibit growth of DU-145 cells after subcutaneous injection (152). Several miR-203-related targets have been identified, depending on the system under investigation. The first system is based on DU145/RASB1 bone metastasis-derived clones whose parental cell line was transformed with RAS G37 (151). In these cell lines, the mechanism of action of miR-203 is based on activation of EGFR signaling as well as inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins (151). EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG), epiregulin (EREG) and transforming growth factor α (TGFα) as well as apoptosis-inhibiting proteins apoptosis inhibitor 5 (API5), cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein (c-IAP1) (BIRC2) and p53-regulated inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (TRIAP1) have been identified as targets of miR-203, which result in activation of metastasis-promoting SRC and ERK signaling (151). In a second system, RAP1, a member of the RAS family of GTPases which are involved in cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions (154,155) was identified as a direct target of miR-203 in DU145 cells (152). In a third system using PC3 cells, survivin, ZEB2, RUNX2, distal-less homeobox 5 (DLX5) and SMAD4 were identified as direct targets of miR-203 (156-158). In PC3 cells, miR-203 reduced expression of osteopontin and osteocalcin genes, which are key osteoblastic genes, indicating that miR-203 may regulate the osteomimetic properties of PC cells (152). In LNCaP cells, miR-203 was identified as a suppressor of LIM and SH3 protein 1 (LASP1), which impaired proliferation and migration of PC cells (159-161). The mechanism of action of miR-203 is summarized in Figure 7.

miRs with a Multitude of Identified Targets

miR-141 targets CD44, methyltransferase EZH2 and several Rho-GTPases. miR-141 is a member of the miR-200 family and is underexpressed in PC stem/progenitor populations in xenografts and tumors (144). Forced expression of miR-141 in CD44+ and bulk PC cells suppressed tumor regeneration and invasion and enforced an epithelial phenotype with loss of the mesenchymal phenotype (144). miR-141 inhibited invasion in PC3, DU145, VCaP, LAPC4, LNCaP and C4-2 PC cells. Ectopic expression of miR-141 in CD44high PC3 and DU-145 PC cells and implantation into the dorsal prostate of non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice resulted in smaller primary tumors and fewer lung metastases. Doxycycline-inducible expression of miR-141 in LAPC9 xenografts reduced growth of xenografts and diminished metastasis (144). The mechanism of action of miR-141 is based on inhibition of CSC-related molecules, cytoskeleton- and cell-cycle-related components, resulting in inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis. CSC-related targets such as CD44 and histone methyltransferase EZH2, a component of the polycomb repressive complex 2, both involved in CSC maintenance, invasion and metastasis, are direct targets of miR-141 (144,145). In addition, several invasion- and motility-modulating Rho GTPases, such as cell division cycle 42 (CDC42), ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC) and actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5 (ARPC5) have been identified as direct targets of miR-141 (Figure 7). These targets are involved in formation of actin stress fibers and lamellipodia, and cytoskeletal reorganization (146-148). Furthermore, miR-141 inhibited cell-cycle-related molecules such as CDK4 and CDK6. However, it is not yet clear, whether these are direct targets of miR-141.

miR-141-3p targets TNF receptor-associated factors (TRAF) 5 and 6. miR-141-3p is an inhibitor of bone metastasis of PC cells and is down-regulated in bone-metastatic PC tissues (149). Intracardiac injection of PC3 cells overexpressing miR-141-3p reduced metastasis to the bones in comparison to controls with fewer metastatic nodules and smaller osteolytic areas of metastatic tumors (149). TRAF5 and TRAF6 were identified as direct targets of miR-141-3p (149). TRAF5 and TRAF6 modulate TNF-induced activation of NFĸB signaling through binding to TNF receptor cytoplasmic domains (150) (Figure 7).

miR-203 inhibits EGFR signaling and anti-apoptotic proteins. miR-203 levels are reduced during progression of PC. Ectopic expression of miR-203 inhibited proliferation, invasion, migration and adhesion of PC cell lines such as DU145, RASB1 and PC3 (151-153). miR-203 induced MET in PC cells with concomitant expression of E-cadherin (153). RASB1 cells ectopically expressing miR-203 exhibited a significant decrease in brain and bone metastases after intracardiac injection (151). In a second in vivo model, miR-203 was shown to inhibit growth of DU-145 cells after subcutaneous injection (152). Several miR-203-related targets have been identified, depending on the system under investigation. The first system is based on DU145/RASB1 bone metastasis-derived clones whose parental cell line was transformed with RAS G37 (151). In these cell lines, the mechanism of action of miR-203 is based on activation of EGFR signaling as well as inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins (151). EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG), epiregulin (EREG) and transforming growth factor α (TGFα) as well as apoptosis-inhibiting proteins apoptosis inhibitor 5 (API5), cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein (c-IAP1) (BIRC2) and p53-regulated inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (TRIAP1) have been identified as targets of miR-203, which result in activation of metastasis-promoting SRC and ERK signaling (151). In a second system, RAP1, a member of the RAS family of GTPases which are involved in cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions (154,155) was identified as a direct target of miR-203 in DU145 cells (152). In a third system using PC3 cells, survivin, ZEB2, RUNX2, distal-less homeobox 5 (DLX5) and SMAD4 were identified as direct targets of miR-203 (156-158). In PC3 cells, miR-203 reduced expression of osteopontin and osteocalcin genes, which are key osteoblastic genes, indicating that miR-203 may regulate the osteomimetic properties of PC cells (152). In LNCaP cells, miR-203 was identified as a suppressor of LIM and SH3 protein 1 (LASP1), which impaired proliferation and migration of PC cells (159-161). The mechanism of action of miR-203 is summarized in Figure 7.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors are (AE, FB, UB) or were (UHW) employed by Roche. Roche is interested in targeted therapies.

References

  • 1.American Cancer Society Facts & Figures 2017. American Cancer Society. 2017 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yap TA, Smith AD, Ferraldeschi R, Al-Lazkani B, Workman P, de Bono JS. Drug discovery in advanced prostate cancer: translating biology into therapy. Nature Drug Discov. 2016;15:699–718. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yoo S, Choi SY, You D, Kim CS. New drugs in prostate cancer. Prostate Int. 2016;4:37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spratt DE, Zumsteg ZS, Feng FY, Tomlins SA. Translational and clinical implications of the genetic landscape of prostate cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:597–610. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Flavin R, Pettersson A, Hendrickson WA, Fiorentino M, Finn S, Kunz L, Judson GL, Lis R, Bailey D, Fiore C, Nuttall E, Martin NE, Stack E, Penney KL, Rider JR, Sinnott J, Sweeney C, Sesso HD, Fall K, Giovannucci E, Kantoff P, Stampfer M, Loda M, Mucci LA. SPINK1 protein expression and prostate cancer expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:4904–4911. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wilson MR, Zoubeidi A. Clusterin as a therapeutic target. Exp Opin Ther Targets. 2017;21:201–213. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2017.1267142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Higano CS. Potential use of custirsen to treat prostate cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:785–797. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S33077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Manca P, Patano F, Juliani M, Ribelli G, De Lisi D, Danesi R, Del Re M, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Santini D. Determinants of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Crit Rev Oncol. 2017;112:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: Causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:584–593. doi: 10.1038/nrc867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Loberg RD, Logothetis CJ, Keller ET, Pienta KJ. Pathogenesis and treatment of prostate cancer bone metastasis: Targeting the lethal phenotype. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8232–8241. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.0841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dushyanthen S, Cossigny DA, Quan GM. The osteoblastic and osteoclastic interactions in spinal metastases secondary to prostate cancer. Cancer Growth Metastasis. 2013;6:61–80. doi: 10.4137/CGM.S12769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Obenauf AC, Massague J. Surviving at a distance: Organ-specific metastasis. Trends Cancer. 2015;1:76–91. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2015.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Conley-LaComb MK, Semaan L, Singarereddy R, Li Y, Heath EI, Kim S, Cher ML, Chinni SR. Pharmacological targeting of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in prostate cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer. 2016;15:68. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0552-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jung Y, Kim JK, Shiozawa Y, Wang J, Mishra A, Joseph J, Berry JE, McGee S, Lee E, Sun H, Wang J, Jin T, Zhang H, Dai J, Krebsbach PH, Keller ET, Pienta KJ, Taichman RS. Recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells into prostate tumors promotes metastasis. Nat Comm. 2013;4:1795. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Luo J, Beer TM, Graff JN. Treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncology. 2016;30:336–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pillai RS. MicroRNA function: Multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA. RNA. 2005;11:1753–1761. doi: 10.1261/rna.2248605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Croce CM. Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:704–714. doi: 10.1038/nrg2634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lin S, Gregory RI. MicroRNA biogenesis pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:321–333. doi: 10.1038/nrc3932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peter ME. Targeting of mRNAs by multiple miRNAs: The next step. Oncogene. 2010;29:2161–2164. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Shimizu M, Wojcik SE, Ageilan RI, Zupo S, Dono M, Rassenti L, Alder H, Volinia S, Liu CG, Kipps TJ, Negrini M, Croce CM. miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;102:13944–13949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506654102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Svoronos AA, Engelman DM, Slack FJ. OncomiR or tumor suppressor? The duplicity of microRNAs in cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3666–3670. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Taylor MA, Sossey-Alaoui K, Thompson CL, Danielpour D, Schiemann WP. TGF-β up-regulates miR-181 expression to promote breast cancer metastasis. J Clin Inv. 2013;123:150–163. doi: 10.1172/JCI64946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Weidle UH, Dickopf S, Hintermair C, Kollmorgen G, Birzele F, Brinkmann U. The role of micrRNAs in breast cancer metastasis: Preclinical validation and potential therapeutic targets. Cancer Genomics Proeomics. 2018;15:17–39. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weidle UH, Birzele F, Kollmorgen G, Nopora A. Potential micro-RNA-related targets for therapeutic intervention with ovarian cancer metastasis. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2018;15:1–15. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stiegelbauer V, Vychytilova-Faltejskova P, Karbiener M, Pehsert AM, Reichner A, Resel M, Heitzer E, Ivan C, Bullock M, Ling H, Deutsch A, Wulf-Goldenberg A, Adiprasito JB, Stoeger H, Haybaeck J, Svoboda M, Stotz M, Hoefler G, Slaby O, Calin GA, Gerger A, Pichler M. miR-196b-5p regulates colorectal cancer cell migration and metastases through interaction with HOXB7 and GALNT5. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:5255–5266. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chang RM, Xiao S, Lei X, Yang H, Fang F, Yang LY. miRNA-478a promotes proliferation and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:2593–2604. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Humphrey PA. Histological variants of prostatic carcinoma and their significance. Histopathology. 2012;60:59–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cunningham D, Zhou Z. In vitro and in vivo model systems used in prostate cancer research. J Biol Methods. 2015;2:e17. doi: 10.14440/jbm.2015.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Park SI, Kim SJ, McCauley LK, Gallick GE. Pre-clinical mouse models of human prostate cancer and their utility in drug discovery. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2010:Chapter 14, Unit 14.15. doi: 10.1002/0471141755.ph1415s51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koshida K, Konaka H, Imao T, Egawa M, Mizokami A, Namiki M. Comparison of two in vivo models for prostate cancer: Orthotopic and intratesticular inoculation of LNCaP or PC3 cells. Int J Urol. 2004;11:1114–1121. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Greenberg NM, DeMayo F, Finegold MJ, Medina D, Tilley WD, Aspinall JO, Cunha GR, Donjacour AA, Matusik FJ, Rosen JM. Prostate cancer in a transgenic mouse. Proc Natl Acad USA. 1995;92:3439–3443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ginrich JR, Barrios RJ, Morton RA, Boyce BF, DeMayo FJ, Finegold MJ, Angelopoulu R, Rosen JM, Greenberg NM. Metastatic prostate cancer in a transgenic mouse. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4096–4102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Seashols-Williams SJ, Budd W, Clark GC, Wu Q, Daniel R, Dragescu E, Zehner ZE. miR-9 acts as an oncomiR in prostate cancer through multiple pathways that drive tumor progression and metastasis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e159601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu M, Zhu H, Yang S, Wang Z, Bai J, Xu N. c-Myc suppressed E-cadherin through miR-9 at the post-transcriptional level. Cell Biol Int. 2013;37:197–202. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhuang G, Wu X, Jiang Z, Kasman I, Yao J, Guan Y, Oeh J, Modrusan Z, Bais C, Sampath D, Ferrara N. Tumor secreted miR-9 promotes endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis by activating the JAK-STAT pathway. EMBO J. 2012;31:3513–3523. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Das R, Gregory PA, Fernandes RC, Denis I, Wang Q, Townley SL, Zhao SG, Hanson AR, Pickering MA, Armstrong HK, Lohman NA, Ebrahimie E, Davicione E, Jenkins RB, Kames RJ, Ross AE, Den RB, Klein EA, Chi KN, Ramshaw HS, Williams ED, Zoubeid A, Goodall GJ, Feng FY, Butler LM, Tilley WD, Selth LA. MicroRNA-194 promotes prostate cancer metastasis by inhibiting SOCS2. Cancer Res. 2017;77:1021–1034. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wu D, Sunkel B, Chen Z, Liu X, Ye Z, Li Q, Grenade C, Ke J, Zhang C, Chen H, Nephew KP, Huang TH, Liu Z, Jin VX, Wang Q. Three-tiered role of the pioneer factor GATA2 in promoting androgen-dependent gene expression in prostate cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:3607–3622. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chiang YT, Wang K, Fazli L, Qi RZ, Gleave ME, Collins CC, Gout PW, Wang Y. GATA2 as a potential metastasis-driving gene in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2014;5:451–461. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Letellier E, Haan S. SOCS2: Physiological and pathological functions. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2016;8:189–204. doi: 10.2741/E760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sen B, Peng S, Woods DM, Wistuba I, Bell D, El-Naggar AK, Lai SY, Johnson FM. STAT5A-mediated SOCS2 expression regulates JAK2 and STAT3 activity following c-SRC inhibition in head and neck squamous carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:127–139. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ren D, Yang Q, Dai Y, Guo W, Du H, Song L, Peng X. Oncogenic miR-210-3p promotes prostate cancer cell EMT and bone metastases via NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:117. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0688-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Park SH, Kim KE, Hwang HY, Kim TY. Regulatory effect of SOCS on NF-kappaB activity in murine monocytes/ macrophages. DNA Cell Biol. 2003;22:131–139. doi: 10.1089/104454903321515931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gingras S, Paraganas E, de Pauw A, Ihle JN, Murray PJ. Re-examination of the role of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) in the regulation of toll-like receptor signaling. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:54702–54707. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411043200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Verstrepen L, Carpentier I, Verhelst K, Bevaert R. ABINs: A20 binding inhibitors of NF-kappa B and apoptosis signaling. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78:105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ben-Neriah Y. Pinning NF-kappa B to the nucleus. Mol Cell. 2003;12:1344–1345. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00493-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tsai YC, Chen WY, Siu MK, Tsai HY, Yin JJ, Huang J, Liu YN. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling promotes metastatic prostate cancer through microRNA-96-mediated down-regulation of the tumor suppressor ETV6. Cancer Letters. 2017;384:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hock H, Shimamura A. ETV6 in hematopoesis and leukemia predisposition. Semin Hematol. 2017;54:98–104. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2017.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Taylor BS, Schultz N, Hieronymus H, Gopalan A, Xiao Y, Carver BS, Arora VK, Kaushik P, Cerami E, Reva B, Antipin Y, Mitsiades N, Landers T, Dolgaley I, Major JE, Wilson M, Socci ND, Lash AE, Heguy A, Eastham JA, Scher HI, Reuter VE, Scardino PT, Sander C, Sawyers CL, Gerald WL. Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang Q, Dong S, Yao H, Wen L, Qiu H, Qin L, Ma L, Chen S. ETV6 mutation in a cohort of 970 patients with hematologic malignancies. Haematologica. 2014;99:e176–178. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.104406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hafliadottir BS, Larne O, Martin M, Persson M, Edsjo A, Biartell A, Ceder Y. Up-regulation of miR-96 enhances cellular proliferation of prostate cancer cells through FOXO1. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nakamura N, Ramaswamy S, Vazquez F, Signoretti S, Loda M, Sellers WR. Forkhead transcription factors are critical effectors of cell death and cell-cycle arrest downstream of PTEN. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:8969–8982. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.23.8969-8982.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dong HY, Chen C, Sun X, Guo P, Vessella RL, Wang RX, Chung LW, Zhou W, Dong JT. FOXO1A is a candidate for the 13q14 tumor-suppressor gene inhibiting androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6998–7006. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ramaswamy S, Nakamura N, Sansal I, Bergeron L, Sellers WR. A novel mechanism of gene regulation and tumor suppression by the transcription factor FKHR. Cancer Cell. 2002;2:81–91. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00086-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu P, Li S, Gan l, Kao TP, Huang H. A transcription-independent function of FOXO1 in inhibition of androgen-independent activation of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:10290–10299. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Siu MK, Tsai YC, Chang YS, Yin JJ, Suau F, Chen WY, Liu YN. Transforming growth factor-beta promotes prostate bone metastasis through induction of microRNA-96 and activation of the mTOR pathway. Oncogene. 2015;34:4767–4776. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ma Y, Yang HZ, Dong BJ, Zou HB, Zhou Y, Kong XM, Huang YR. Biphasic regulation of autophagy by miR-96 in prostate cancer cells under hypoxia. Oncotarget. 2014;15:9169–9182. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Josson S, Gururajan M, Hu P, Shao C, Chu GY, Zhau HE, Liu C, Lao K, Lu CL, Lu YT, Lichterman J, Nandana S, Li Q, Rogatko A, Berel D, Posadas EM, Fazli L, Sareen D, Chung LW. miR-409-3p/-5p promotes tumorigenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and bone metastasis of human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:4636–4647. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gururajan M, Josson S, Chu GC, Lu CL, Lu YT, Haga CL, Zhau HE, Liu C, Lichterman J, Duan P, Posadas EM, Chung LW. miR-154* and miR-379 in the DLK–DIO3 microRNA mega-cluster regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition and bone metastasis of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6559–6569. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Solomon DA, Kim T, Diaz-Martinez LA, Fair J, Elkahloun AG, Harris BT, Toretsky JA, Rosenberg SA, Shukla N, Ladanyi M, Samuels Y, James CD, Yu H, Kim JS, Waldman T. Mutational inactivation of STAG2 causes aneuploidy in human cancer. Science. 2011;333:1039–1043. doi: 10.1126/science.1203619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kim MS, Kim SS, Je EM, Yoo NJ, Lee SH. Mutational and expressional analyses of STAG2 gene in solid cancers. Neoplasma. 2012;59:524–529. doi: 10.4149/neo_2012_067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dougherty GW, Jose C, Gimona M, Cutler ML. The RSU1–PINCH1–ILK complex is regulated by RAS activation in tumor cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2008;87:721–734. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Maddika S, Ande SR, Panigrahi S, Paranjothy T, Weglarczyk K, Zuse A, Eshraghi M, Manda KD, Wiechec E, Los M. Cell survival, cell death and cell-cycle pathways are interconnected: implications for cancer therapy. Drug Resist Update. 2007;10:13–29. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kurata A, Katayama R, Watanabe T, Tsuruo T, Fujita N. TUSC4/NPRL2, a novel PDK1-interacting protein, inhibits PDK1 tyrosine phosphorylation and its downstream signaling. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:1827–1837. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00874.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Iwata S, Takenobu H, Kageyama H, Koseki H, Ishii T, Nakazawa A, Tatezaki A, Tatezaki S, Nakagawara A, Kamiio T. Polycomb group molecule PHC3 regulates polycomb complex composition and prognosis of osteosarcoma. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:1647–1652. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01586.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Maxwell PH, Wiesenger MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME, Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maher ER, Ratcliffe PJ. The tumor suppressor VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature. 1999;399:271–275. doi: 10.1038/20459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Edlund S, Bu S, Schuster N, Aspenström P, Heuchel R, Heldin NE, ten Dijke P, Heldin CH, Landström M. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta)-induced apoptosis of prostate cancer cells involves SMAD7-dependent activation of p38 by TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:529–544. doi: 10.1091/mbc.02-03-0037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Liu X, Chen Q, Yan J, Wang Y, Zhu C, Chen C, Zhao X, Xu M, Sun Q, Deng R, Zhang H, Qu Y, Huang J, Jiang B, Yu B. miRNA-296-3p–ICAM-1 axis promotes metastasis of prostate cancer by possible enhancing survival of natural killer cell-resistant circulating tumor cells. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e928. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hanna M. Role of natural killer cells in control of cancer metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1982;1:45–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00049480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chong AS, Boussy IA, Jiang XK, Lamas M, Graf LH Jr. CD54/ICAM-1 is a co-stimulator of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Cell Immunol. 1994;157:92–105. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1994.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Xie H, Li L, Zhu G, Dang Q, Ma Z, He D, Chang L, Song W, Chang HC, Krolewski JP, Nastiuk KL, Yeh S, Chang C. Infiltrated pre-adipocytes increase prostate cancer metastasis via modulation of the miR-301a/androgen receptor (AR)/TGFbeta1/ SMAD/MMP9 signals. Oncotarget. 2015;6:12326–12329. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nam RK, Amemiya Y, Benatar T, Wallis CJ, Stojcic-Bendavid J, Bacopulos S, Sherman C, Sugar L, Naeim M, Yang W, Zhang A, Klotz LH, Narod SA, Seth A. Identification and validation of five microRNA signature of prostate cancer recurrence and metastasis: A cohort study. J Cancer. 2015;6:1160–1171. doi: 10.7150/jca.13397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Qi W, Gao S, Wang Z. Transcriptional regulation of the TGF-beta1 promoter by androgen receptor. Biochem J. 2008;416:453–462. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Derynk R, Zhang Y, Feng XH. SMADs: Transcriptional activators of TGF-beta responses. Cell. 1998;95:737–740. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81696-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Heinlein CA, Chang C. Androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:276–308. doi: 10.1210/er.2002-0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rosen ED, MacDougald OA. Adipocyte differentiation from the inside out. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:885–896. doi: 10.1038/nrm2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Collins AT, Berry TA, Hyde C, Stower MJ, Maitland NJ. Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10946–10951. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Patrawala L, Cahoun T, Schneider-Broussard R, Li H, Bhatia B, Tang S, Reilly JG, Chandra D, Zhou J, Claypool K, Coghlan L, Tang DG. Highly purified CD44+ prostate cancer cells from xenograft human tumors are enriched in tumorigenic and metastatic progenitor cells. Oncogene. 2006;25:1696–1708. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bucay N, Sekhon K, Yang T, Majid S, Shahryari V, Hsieh C, Mitsui Y, Deng G, Tabatabai Z, Yamamura S, Calin GA, Dahiya R, Tanaka Y, Saini S. MicroRNA-383 located in frequently deleted chromosomal locus 8p22 regulates CD44 in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:2667–2679. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Liu C, Kelnar K, Liu B, Chen X, Calhoun-Davis T, Li H, Patrawala L, Yan H, Jeter C, Honorio S, Wiggins JF, Bader Ag, Fagin R, Brown D, Tang DG. The microRNA miR-34a inhibits prostate cancer stem cells and metastasis by directly repressing CD44. Nat Med. 2011;17:211–215. doi: 10.1038/nm.2284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Saini S, Majid S, Shahryari V, Arora S, Yamamura S, Chang I, Zaman MS, Deng G, Tanaka Y, Dahiva R. miRNA-708 control of CD44 (+) prostate cancer-initiating cells. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3618–3630. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yang K, Handorean AM, Iczkowski KA. MicroRNAs 373 and 520c are down-regulated in prostate cancer, suppress CD44 translation and enhance invasion of prostate cancer cells in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2009;2:361–369. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Iczkowski KA. Cell adhesion molecule CD44: Its functional role in prostate cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2010;3:1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wang L, Song G, Tan W, Qi M, Zhang L, Chan J, Yu J, Han J, Han B. miR-573 inhibits prostate cancer metastasis by regulating epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget. 2015;6:35978–35990. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Nguyen AH, Tremblay M, Haigh K, Koumakpayi ICH, Paquet M, Pandolfi PP, Mes-Masson AM, Saad F, Haigh JJ, Brouchard M. GATA3 antagonizes cancer progression in PTEN-deficient prostates. Human Mol Genet. 2013;22:2400–2410. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tomlinson DC, Baxter EW, Loadman PM, Hull MA, Knowles MA. FGFR1-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition through MAPK7PLCgamma/COX2-mediated mechanisms. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Peng X, Guo W, Liu T, Wang X, Tu X, Xiong D, Chen S, Lai Y, Du H, Chen G, Liu G, Tang Y, Huang S, Zou X. identification of miRs-143 and-145 that are associated with bone metastasis of prostate cancer and involved in regulation of EMT. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sachdeva M, Mo YY. miR-145-mediated suppression of cell growth, invasion and metastasis. Am J Transl Res. 2010;2:170–189. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhou C, Nitschke AM, Xiong W, Zhang Q, Tang Y, Boch M, Elliott S, Zhu Y, Bazzone L, Yu D, Weldon CB, Schiff R, McLachlan JA, Beckman BS, Wiese TE, Nephew KP, Shan B, Burrow ME, Wang G. Proteomic analysis of tumor necrosis factor-alpha resistant human breast cancer cells reveals MEK5/ERK5-mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition phenotype. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R105. doi: 10.1186/bcr2210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Clape C, Fritz V, Henriquet C, Apparailly F, Fernandez PL, Iborra F, Avances C, Villalba M, Culine S, Fajas L. miR-143 interferes with ERK5 signaling, and abrogates prostate cancer progression in mice. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Williams LV, Veliceasa D, Vinokour E, Volpert OV. miR-200b inhibits prostate cancer EMT, growth and metastasis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kong D, Li Y, Wang Z, Banerjee S, Ahmad A, Kim HR, Sarkar FH. miR-200 regulates PDGF-D-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition, adhesion and invasion of prostate cancer cells. Stem cells. 2009;27:1712–1721. doi: 10.1002/stem.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chen Q, Zhao X, Zhang H, Yuan H, Zhu M, Sun Q, Lai X, Wang Y, Huang J, Yan J, Ju J. miR-130b suppresses prostate cancer metastasis through downregulation of MMP2. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54:1292–1300. doi: 10.1002/mc.22204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kessenbrock K, Plaks V, Werb Z. Matrix metallo-proteinases: Regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell. 2010;141:52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Chen W, Liu Y, Chen H, Ning H, Ding K. Loss of miR-449a-caused PrLZ overexpression promotes prostate cancer metastasis. Int J Oncol. 2017;51:435–444. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang R, Xu J, Mabjeesh N, Zhu G, Zhou J, Ami M, He D, Marshakk FF, Zhau HE, Chung LW. PrLZ is expressed in normal prostate development and in human prostate cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:6040–6048. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Li L, Zhang D, Zhang L, Zhu G, Sun Y, Wu K, Wang X, He D. PrLZ expression is associated with the progression of prostate cancer LNCaP cells. Mol Carcinog. 2009;48:432–40. doi: 10.1002/mc.20481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Li L, Xie H, Liang L, Gao Y, Zhang D, Fang L, Lee So, Luo J, Chen X, Wang X, Chang LS, Yeh S, Wang Y, He D, Chang C. Increased PRLZ-mediated androgen receptor transactivation promotes prostate cancer growth at castration-resistant stage. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:257–267. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zoni E, van der Horst G, van de Marbel AF, Chen L, Rane JK, Pelger RC, Collins AT, Visakorpi T, Snaar-Jagalska BE, Maitland NJ, van der Pluijm G. miR-25 modulates invasiveness and dissemination of human prostate cancer cells via regulation of alphav-alpha6-integrin expression. Cancer Res. 2015;75:2326–2336. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Douville J, Beaulieu R, Balicki D. ALDH as a functional marker of cancer stem and progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2009;18:17–25. doi: 10.1089/scd.2008.0055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cruz-Monserrate Z, O’Connor KL. Integrin alpha 6 beta 4 promotes migration, invasion through TIAM1 and subsequent RAC activation. Neoplasia. 2008;10:408–417. doi: 10.1593/neo.07868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Neijari M, Hafdi Z, Gouysse G, Fiorentino M, Beatrix O, Dumortier J, Pourreyron C, Barozzi C, D’Errico A, Grigioni WF, Scoazec JY. Expression, regulation and function of alpha V integrins in hepatocellular carcinoma: An in vivo and in vitro study. Hepatology. 2002;36:418–426. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Drabsch Y, He S, Zhang L, Snaar-Jagalska BE, ten Dijke P. Transforming growth factor-beta signalling controls human breast cancer metastasis in a zebrafish xenograft model. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R106. doi: 10.1186/bcr3573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Liu YN, Yin J, Barrett B, Sheppard-Tillman H, Li D, Casey OM, Fang L, Hynes PG, Ameri AH, Kelly K. Loss of androgen-regulated microRNA 1 activates SRC and promotes prostate cancer bone metastasis. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35:1940–1951. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00008-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Martens-Uzunova ES, Jalaya SE, Dites NF, van Leenders GJ, Moeller S, Trapman J, Bangma CH, Litman T, Visakorpi T, Jenster G. Diagnostic and prognostic features from the small non-coding RNA transcriptome in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2012;31:978–991. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Varkaris A, Katsiampoura AD, Araujo JC, Gallick GE, Corn PG. SRC signaling pathways in prostate cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014;33:595–606. doi: 10.1007/s10555-013-9481-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Yin JJ, Zhang L, Munasinghe J, Linnolla RI, Kelly K. Cediranib/AZD2171 inhibits bone and brain metastasis in a preclinical model of advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:8662–8673. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Chang YS, Chen WY, Yin JJ, Sheppard-Tillman H, Huang J, Liu YN. EGF receptor promotes prostate cancer bone metastasis by down-regulating miR-1 and activating TWIST1. Cancer Res. 2015;75:3077–386. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Takeshita F, Patrawala L, Osaki M, Takahashi RU, Yamaamoto Y, Kosaka N, Kawamata M, Kelnar K, Bader AG, Brown D, Ochiya T. Systemic delivery of synthetic microRNA-16 inhibits the growth of metastatic prostate tumors via downregulation of multiple cell-cycle genes. Mol Ther. 2010;18:181–187. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cai S, Chen R. Li R, Li X, Cai Y, Ye Z, Li S, Li J, Huang H, Peng S, Wang J, Tao Y, Huang H, Wen X, Mo J, Den Z, Wang J, Zhang Y, Gao X, Wen X. Downregulation of microRNA-23a suppresses prostate cancer metastasis by targeting the PAK6-LIMK1 signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2015;6:3904–3917. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Liu X, Busby J, John C, Wie J, Yuan X, Lu ML. Direct interaction between AR and PAK6 in androgen-stimulated PAK6 activation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ye DZ, Field J. PAK signaling in cancer. Cell Logist. 2012;2:105–116. doi: 10.4161/cl.21882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Edwards DC, Gill GN. Structural features of LIM kinase that control effects on the actin cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:11352–11361. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.16.11352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Prunier C, Prudent R, Kapur R, Sadoul K, Lafanechiere L. LIM kinases. Cofilin and beyond. Oncotarget. 2017;8:41749–41763. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Arber S, Barbayannis FA, Hanser H, Schneider C, Stanyon CA, Bernard O, Caroni P. Regulation of actin dynamics through phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase. Nature. 1998;393:805–809. doi: 10.1038/31729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Qin J, Wu SP, Creighton CJ, Dai F, Xie X, Cheng CM, Froloy A, Ayala G, Lin X, Feng XH, Ittmann MM, Tsai SJ, Tsai MJ, Tsai SY. COUP-TFII inhibits TGF-β-induced growth barrier to promote prostate tumorigenesis. Nature. 2013;493:236–240. doi: 10.1038/nature11674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Lin S-C, Kao C-K, Lee H-J, Creighton CJ, Ittmann MM, Shaw JT, Tsai SY, Tsai M-J. Dysregulation of miRNAs-COUP-TFII–FOXM1–CENPF axis contributes to the metastasis of prostate cancer. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11418. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kalin TV, Wang IC, Ackerson TJ, Major ML, Detrisac CJ, Kalnichenko VV, Lyubimov A, Costa RH. Increased levels of FOXM1 transcription factor accelerate development and progression of prostate carcinomas in both TRAMP and LADY transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1712–1720. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Aytes A, Mitrofanova A, Lefebvre C, Alvarez MJ, Castillo-Martin M, Zheng T, Eastham JA, Gopalan A, Pienta KJ, Shen MM, Califano A, Abate-Shen C. Cross-species regulatory network analysis identifies a synergistic interaction between FOXM1 and CENPF that drives prostate cancer malignancy. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:638–651. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Colden M, Dar AA, Saini S, Dahiya PV, Shahryari V, Yamamura S, tanaka Y, Stein G, Dahiya R, Majid S. MicroRNA-466 inhibits tumor growth and bone metastasis in prostate cancer by direct regulation of osteogenic transcription factor RUNX2. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2572. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Pratap J, Lian JB, Jarved A, Barnes GL, van Winen AJ, Stein JL, Stein GS. Regulatory roles of RUNX2 in metastatic tumor and cancer cell interactions with bone. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25:589–600. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-9032-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Pratap J, Javed A, Lanquino LR, van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Stein GS, Lian JB. The RUNX2 osteogenic transcription factor regulates matrix metalloproteinase 9 in bone metastatic cancer cells and controls cell invasion. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:8581–8591. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.19.8581-8591.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ishteiwy RA, Ward TM, Dykxhoorn DM, Burnstein KL. The microRNA-23b/-27b cluster suppresses the metastatic phenotype of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. PLos One. 2012;7:e52106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Rice MA, Ishteiwy RA, Magani F, Udayakumar T, Reiner T, Yates TJ, Miller P, Perez-Stable C, Rai P, Verdun R, Dykxhoorn DM, Burnstein KL. The microRNA-23b/-27b cluster suppresses prostate cancer metastasis via Huntingtin-interacting protein 1-related. Oncogene. 2016;35:4752–4761. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Gottfried I, Ehrlich M, Ashery U. The SLA2P/HIP1R family: Similar structure, similar function in endocytosis. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38:187–191. doi: 10.1042/BST0380187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Zhang H, Qi S, Zhang T, Wang A, Liu R, Guo J, Wang Y, Xu F. MiR-188-5p inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in prostate cancer by repressing LAPTM4B expression. Oncotarget. 2015;6:6092–6104. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Meng Y, Wang L, Chen D, Chang Y, Zhang M, Xu JJ, Zhou R, Zhang QY. LAPTM4B: An oncogene in various solid tumors and its functions. Oncogene. 2016;35:6359–6365. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Yang H, Xiong FX, Lin M, Yang Y, Nie X, Zhou RL. LAPTM4B-35 overexpression is a risk factor for tumor recurrence and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:275–281. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0659-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Yang Y, Yang H, McNutt MA, Xiong F, Nie X, Li L, Zhou R. LAPTM4B overexpression is an independent prognostic marker in ovarian carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2008;20:1077–1083. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Zhou L, He XD, Chen J, Cui QC, Qu Q, Rui JA, Zhao YP. Overexpression of LAPTM4B-35 closely correlated with clinicopathological features and post-resectional survival of gallbladder carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:809–815. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zhou L, He XD, Cui QC, Zhou WX, Qu Q, Zhou RL, Rui JA, Yu JC. Expression of LAPTM4B-35: A novel marker of progression, invasiveness and poor prognosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2008;264:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Guo J, Wang M, Liu X. MicroRNA-195 suppresses tumor cell proliferation and metastasis by directly targeting BCOX1, a novel gene overexpressed in prostate carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:91. doi: 10.1186/s13046-015-0209-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Song J, Yang W, Shih IeM, Zhang Z, Bai J. Identification of BCOX1, a novel gene overexpressed in breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1760:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Liu T, Zhang XY, He XH, Geng JS, Liu Y, Kong DJ, Shi QY, Liu F, Wei W, Pang D. High levels of BCOX1 expression are associated with poor prognosis in patients with invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Guo J, Liu X, Wang M. miR-503 suppresses tumor cell proliferation and metastasis by directly targeting RNF31 in prostate cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464:1302–1308. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.07.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Kirisako T, Kamei K, Murata S, Kato M, Fukumoto H, Kanie M, Sano S, Tokunaga F, Tanaka K, Iwai K. A ubiquitin ligase complex assembles linear polyubiquitin chains. EMBO J. 2006;25:4877–4887. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Walczak H, Iwai K, Dikic I. Generation and physiological role of linear polyubiquitin chains. BMC Biol. 2012;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Stieglitz B, Rana RR, Koliopoulos MG, Morris-Davies AC, Schaeffer V, Christodoulou E, Howell S, Brown NR, Dikic I, Rittinger K. Structural basis for ligase-specific conjugation of linear ubiquitin chains by HOIP. Nature. 2013;503:422–426. doi: 10.1038/nature12638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Zhu J, Zhao C, Zhuang T, Jonsson P, Sinha I, Williams C, Strömblad S, Dahlman-Wright K. RING finger protein 31 promotes p53 degradation in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2016;35:1955–1964. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Zhu J, Zhuang T, Yang H, Li X, Liu H, Wang H. Atypical ubiquitin ligase RNF31: The nuclear factor modulator in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:538. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2575-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Yang J, Lu C, Wie J, Guo Y, Liu W, Luo L, Fisch G, Li X. Inhibition of KPNA4 attenuates prostate cancer metastasis. Oncogene. 2017;36:2868–2878. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Lam J, Takeshita S, Barker JE, Kanagawa O, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. TNF-alpha induces osteoclastogenesis by direct stimulation of macrophages exposed to permissive levels of RANK ligand. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:1481–1488. doi: 10.1172/JCI11176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Kobayashi K, Takahashi N, Jimi E, Udagawa N, Takami M, Kotake S, Nakagawa N, Kinosaki M, Yamaguchi K, Shima N, Yasuda H, Morinaga T, Higashio K, Martin TJ, Suda T. Tumor necrosis factor alpha stimulates osteoclast differentiation by a mechanism independent of the ODF/RANKL-RANK interaction. J Exp Med. 2000;191:275–286. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Ostuni R, Kratochvill F, Murray PJ, Natoli G. Macrophages and cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Trends Immunol. 2015;36:229–239. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Liu C, Liu R, Zhang D, Deng Q, Liu B, Chao HP, Rycaj K, Takata Y, Lin K, Lu Y, Zhong Y, Krolewski J, Shen J, Tang DG. MicroRNA-141 suppresses prostate cancer stem cells and metastasis by targeting a cohort of pro-metastatic genes. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14270. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Varambally S, Dhanasekaran SM, Zhou M, Barette TR, Kumar-Sinha C, Sanda MG, Ghosh D, Pienta KJ, Sewalt RG, Otte AP, Rubin MA, Chinnaiyan AM. The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature. 2002;419:624–629. doi: 10.1038/nature01075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Rottner K, Stradal TE. Actin dynamics and turnover in cell motility. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011;23:569–578. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Friedl P, Alexander S. Cancer invasion and the micro-environment: Plasticity and reprocity. Cell. 2011;147:992–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Sanz-Moreno V, Marshall CJ. The plasticity of cytoskeletal dynamics underlying neoplastic cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:690–696. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Huang S, Wa Q, Pan J, Peng X, Ren D, Huang Y, Chen X, Tang Y. Downregulation of miR-141-3p promotes bone metastasis via activating NF-kappaB signaling in prostate cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36:173. doi: 10.1186/s13046-017-0645-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Xie P. TRAF molecules in cell signaling and in human diseases. J Mol Signal. 2013;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1750-2187-8-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Siu MK, Abou-Kheir W, Yin JJ, Chang YS, Barrett B, Suau F, Casey O, Chen WY, Fang L, Hynes P, Hsieh YY, Liu YN, Huang J, Kelly K. Loss of EGFR signaling promotes bone metastasis and tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistance. Oncotarget. 2014;5:3770–3784. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Xiang J, Bian C, Wang H, Huang S, Wu D. miR-203 down-regulates RAP1A and suppresses cell proliferation, adhesion and invasion in prostate cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:8. doi: 10.1186/s13046-015-0125-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Saini S, Majid S, Yamamura S, Tabatabai L, Suh SO, Shahryari V, Chen Y, Deng G, Tanaka Y, Dahiya R. Regulatory role of miR-203 in prostate cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:5287–5298. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Bos JL. Linking Rap to cell adhesion. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Fujita H, Fukuhara S, Sakurai A, Yamagishi A, Kamioka Y, Nakaoka Y, Masuda M, Mochizuki N. Local activation of RAP1 contributes to directional vascular endothelial cell migration accompanied by extension of microtubules on which RAPL, a RAP1-associating molecule, localizes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:5022–5031. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409701200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Altieri DC, Languino LR, Lian JB, Stein JL, Leav I, van Wijnen AJ, Jiang T, Stein GS. Prostate cancer regulatory networks. J Cell Biochem. 2009;107:845–852. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Brubaker KD, Vessella RL, Brown LG, Corey E. Prostate cancer expression of runt-domain transcription factor RUNX2, a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation and function. Prostate. 2003;56:13–22. doi: 10.1002/pros.10233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Akech J, Wixted JJ, Bedard K, van der Deen M, Hussain S, Guise TA, van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Lanquino LR, Altieri DC, Pratap J, Keller E, Stein GS, Lian JB. RUNX2 association with progression of prostate cancer in patients: mechanisms mediating bone osteolysis and osteoblastic lesions. Oncogene. 2010;29:811–821. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Hailer A, Grunewald TG, Orth M, Reiss C, Kneitz B, Spahn M, Butt E. Loss of tumor suppressor miR-203 mediates overexpression of LIM and SH3 protein 1 (LASP1) in high-risk prostate cancer thereby increasing cell proliferation and migration. Oncotarget. 2014;5:4144–4153. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Grunewald TG, Butt E. The LIM and SH3 domain protein family: Structural proteins or signal transducers or both. Mol Cancer. 2008;7:31. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-7-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Tomasetto C, Moog-Lutz C, Regnier CH, Schreiber V, Basset P, Rio MC. LASP-1 (MLN 50) defines a new LIM protein subfamily characterized by the association of LIM and SH3 domains. FEBS Lett. 1995;373:245–249. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01040-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Broderick JA, Zamore PD. MicroRNA therapeutics. Gene Ther. 2011;18:1104–1110. doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Gambari R, Brognara E, Spandidos DA, Fabbri E. Targeting oncomiRNAs and mimicking tumor suppressor miRNAs: New trends in the development of miRNA therapeutic strategies in oncology. Int J Oncol. 2016;49:5–32. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Ling H, Fabbri M, Calin GA. MicroRNAs and other non-coding RNAs as targets for anticancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:847–865. doi: 10.1038/nrd4140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Rupaimoole R, Slack FJ. MicroRNA therapeutics: Towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:203–222. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Li Z, Rana TM. Therapeutic targeting of microRNAs: Current status and future challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:622–638. doi: 10.1038/nrd4359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Garafalo M, Leva GD, Croce CM. MicroRNAs as anticancer therapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:5328–5335. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140128211346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Malek A, Merkel O, Fink L, Czubayko F, Kissel T, Aigner A. In vivo pharmakinetics, tissue distribution and underlying mechansisms of various PE(-PEG) siRNA complexes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;236:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Jung S, Lee SH, Mok H, Chung HJ, Park TG. Gene silencing efficiency of siRNA-PEG conjugates: Effect of PEGylation site and PEG molecular weight. J Control Release. 2010;144:296–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Mui BL, Tam YK, Jajaraman M, Ansell SM, Du X, Tam YY, Lin PJ, Chen S, Narayanannair JK, Rajeev KG, Manoharan M, Akinc A, Maier MA, Cullis P, Madden TD, Hope MJ. Influence of polyethylene glycol lipid desorption rates on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of siRNA lipid nanoparticles. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2013;2:e139. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2013.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhazad OC. Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:185–198. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-040210-162544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Zimmermann TS, Lee AC, Akinc A, Bramlage B, Bumcrot D, Fedorulk MN, Harborth J, Heyes JA, Jeffs LB, John M, Judge AD, Lam K, McClintotock K, Nechev LV, Palmer LR, Racie T, Roehl I, Seiffert S, Shanmugam S, Sood V, Soutschek J, Toudjarsja I, Wheat AJ, Yaworski E, Zedalis W, Koteliansky V, Manoharan M, Vornlocher HP, MacLachlan I. RNAi-mediated gene silencing in non-human primates. Nature. 2006;441:111–114. doi: 10.1038/nature04688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Rozema DB, Lewis DL, Wakefield DH, Wong SC, Klein JJ, Roesch PL, Bertin SL, Reppen TW, Chu Q, Blokhin AV, Hagstrom JE, Wolff JA. Dynamic polyconjugates for targeted in vivo delivery of siRNA to hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:12982–12987. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703778104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Basha G, Novobrantseva TI, Rosin N, Tam YY, Hafez IM, Wong MK, Sugo T, Ruda VM, Qin J, Klebanov B, Ciufolini M, Akinc A, Tam YK, Hope MJ, Cullis PR. Influence of cationic lipid composition on gene silencing properties of lipid nanoparticle formulations of siRNA in antigen-presenting cells. Mol Ther. 2011;19:2186–21200. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Lee H, Lytton-Jean AK, Chen Y, Love KT, Park AI, Karagiannis ED, Sehgal A, Querbes W, Zurenko CS, Jayaraman M, Peng CG, Charisse k, Borodovsky A, Manoharan M, Donahoe JS, Truelove J, Nahrendorf M, Langer R, Anderson DG. Molecularly self-assembled nucleic acid nanoparticles for targeted in vivo siRNA delivery. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:389–393. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Wong SC, Klein JJ, Hamilton HL, Chu Q, Frey CL, Trubetskoy VS, Hegge J, Wakefield D, Rozema DB, Lewis DL. Co-injection of a targeted, reversibly masked endosomolytic polymer dramatically improves the efficacy of cholesterol-conjugated small interfering RNAs in vivo. Nucl Acid Ther. 2012;22:380–390. doi: 10.1089/nat.2012.0389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Kanasty R, Dorkin JR, Vegas A, Anderson D. Delivery materials for siRNA therapeutics. Nat Mater. 2013;12:967–977. doi: 10.1038/nmat3765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Smith D, Schüller V, Engst C, Rädler J, Liedl T. Nucleic acid nanostructures for biomedical aplications. Nanomedicine. 2013;8:105–121. doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Wittrup A, Lieberman J. Knocking down disease: A progress report on siRNA therapeutics. Nat Rev Genetics. 2015;16:543–552. doi: 10.1038/nrg3978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Farokhzad OC, Jon S, Khademhosseini A, Tran TN, Lavan DA, Langer R. Nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates: A new approach for targeting prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7668–7672. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Song E, Zhu P, Lee SK, Chowdury D, Kussmann S, Dykxhoorn DM, Feng Y, Palliser D, Weiner DB, Shankar P, Marasco WA, Lieberman J. Antibody mediated in vivo delivery of small interfering RNAs via cell-surface receptors. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:709–717. doi: 10.1038/nbt1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Chu TC, Twu KY, Ellington AD, Levy M. Apatmer-mediated siRNA delivery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:e73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Schneider B, Grote M, John M, Haas A, Bramlage B, Ickenstein LM, Jahn-Hofmann K, Bauss F, Cheng W, Croasdale R, Daub K, Dill S, Hoffmann E, Lau W, Burtscher H, Ludtke JL, Metz S, Mundigl O, Neal Zc, Scheuer W, Stracke J, Herweijer H, Brinkmann U. Targeted siRNA delivery and mRNA knockdown mediated by bispecific digoxigenin antibodies. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2012;18:e46. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2012.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Cuellar TL, Barnes D, Nelson C, Tanquay J, Yu SF, Wen X, Scales SJ, Gesch J, Davis D, van Brabant Smith A, Leake D, Vandlen R, Siebel CW. Systemic evaluation of antibody-mediated siRNA delivery using an industrial platform of THIOMAB-siRNA conjugates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:1189–11293. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Bäumer N, Appel N, Terheyden L, Buchholz F, Rössig C, Müller-Tidow C, Berdel WE, Bäumer S. Antibody-coupled siRNA as an efficient method for in vivo mRNA knockdown. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:22–36. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Diao Y, Liu J, Ma Y, Su M, Zhang H, Hao X. A specific aptamer-cell penetrating peptides complex delivered siRNA efficiently and suppressed prostate tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Biol Ther. 2016;17:498–506. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2016.1156266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Mehrabadi FS, Adelmann J, Gupta S, Wedepohl S, Calderon M, Brinkmann U, Haag R. Bispecific antibodies for targeted delivery of dendritic polyglycerol (dPG) prodrug conjugates. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2016;16:639–649. doi: 10.2174/1568009616666160208142910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Palanca-Wessels MC, Booth GC, Convertine AJ, Lundy BB, Berguig GY, Press MF, Stayton PS, Press OW. Antibody targeting facilitates effective intratumoral siRNA nanoparticle delivery of HER2-overexpressing cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:9561–9575. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Roberts TC, Ezzat K, Andaloussi S, Weinberg MS. Synthetic siRNA delivery: Progress and prospects. Meth Mol Biol. 2016;1364:291–310. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3112-5_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Wu M, Zhao H, Guo L, Wang Y, Song J, Zhao X, Li C, Hao L, Wang D, Tang J. Ultrasound-mediated nanotube destruction (UMND) facilitates the delivery of A10.3.2 aptamer targeted and siRNA-loaded cationic nanobubbles for therapy of prostate cancer. Drug Del. 2018;25:226–240. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1422300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Guo X, MacKay JA, Szoka FC Jr. Mechanism of pH-triggered collapse of phosphatidylethanolamine liposomes stabilized by an ortho ester polyethyleneglycol lipid. Biophys J. 2003;84:1784–1795. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74986-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Shin J, Shum P, Thompson DH. Acid-triggered release via dePEGylation of DOPE liposomes containing acid-labile vinyl ether PEG-lipids. J Control Release. 2003;91:187–200. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00232-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Derossi D, Joliot AH, Chassaing G, Prochiantz A. The third helix of antennapedia homeodomain translocates through biological membranes. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:10444–10450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Thoren PE, Persson D, Isakson P, Goksör M, Onfelt A, Norden B. Uptake of analogs of penetratin, TAT(48-60) and oligoarginine in live cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;307:100–107. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01135-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Copolovici DM, Langel K, Eriste E, Langel U. Cell-penetrating peptides. Design, synthesis, and applications. ACS Nano. 2014;8:1972–1994. doi: 10.1021/nn4057269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Zorko M, Langel U. Cell-penetrating peptides: mechanism and kinetics of cargo delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:529–545. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Haas AK, Maisel D, Adelmann J, von Schwerin C, Kahnt I, Brinkmann U. Human-protein-derived peptides for intracellular delivery of biomolecules. Biochem J. 2012;442:583–593. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics are provided here courtesy of International Institute of Anticancer Research

RESOURCES