Skip to main content
Journal of the Endocrine Society logoLink to Journal of the Endocrine Society
. 2018 Nov 21;3(2):359–371. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00241

Brain Metastases From Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Prevalence, Current Therapies, and Outcomes

Cristiane J Gomes-Lima 1,2, Di Wu 1,3, Sarika N Rao 2,7, Sree Punukollu 4, Rama Hritani 4, Alexander Zeymo 5, Hala Deeb 5, Mihriye Mete 5, Edward F Aulisi 6, Douglas Van Nostrand 1,3, Jacqueline Jonklaas 7, Leonard Wartofsky 2, Kenneth D Burman 2,7,
PMCID: PMC6348752  PMID: 30706042

Abstract

Background and Objective

The brain is an unusual site for distant metastases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). The aim of this study was to document the prevalence of brain metastases from DTC at our institutions and to analyze the current therapies and the outcomes of these patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with DTC and secondary neoplasia of the brain.

Results

From 2002 to 2016, 9514 cases of thyroid cancer were evaluated across our institutions and 24 patients met our inclusion criteria, corresponding to a prevalence of 0.3% of patients with DTC. Fourteen (58.3%) were female and 10 (41.7%) were male. Fifteen patients had papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) (62.5%). Brain metastases were diagnosed 0 to 37 years (mean ± SD, 10.6 ± 10.4 years) after the initial diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Patients undergoing surgery had a median survival time longer than those that did not undergo surgery (27.3 months vs 6.8 months; P = 0.15). Patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) had a median survival time longer than those that did not receive SRS (52.5 months vs 6.7 months; P = 0.11). Twelve patients (50%) were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and they had a better survival than those who have not used a TKI (median survival time, 27.2 months vs 4.7 months; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The prevalence of brain metastases of DTC in our institutions was 0.3% over 15 years. The median survival time after diagnosis of brain metastases was 19 months. In our study population, the use of TKI improved the survival rates.

Keywords: thyroid cancer, DTC, brain metastases, prevalence, therapies


Brain metastases are more common than primary tumors of the central nervous system. The primary cancers that most frequently develop brain metastasis are lung (19.9%), melanoma (6.9%), renal (6.5%), breast (5.1%), and colorectal (1.8%) cancers [1]. For differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), the brain is an unusual site for distant metastases, occurring in about 0.15% to 1.3% of the cases [2]. Studies conducted in tertiary referral centers reported a prevalence of brain metastases from DTC of 1.2% [3] and 1.4% [4].

Historically, brain metastases from any primary tumor are associated with poor prognosis, but recent operative advances and new modalities of treatment have substantially increased survival [5]. Several retrospective studies have attempted to determine the possible impact of therapies on the prognosis of patients with brain metastases from DTC [3, 4, 6, 7]. The 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines on differentiated thyroid cancer, in recommendation 94, state that surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery are the mainstays of therapy for brain metastases from DTC. Iodine-131 (131I) can be used if the lesions concentrate radioactive iodine. Yet this is a weak recommendation, based on low-quality evidence [8].

The goal of our study was to document the prevalence of brain metastases from DTC at MedStar Health institutions over 15 years and to analyze current therapies and the outcomes of affected patients.

1. Methods

We searched MedStar Health institutions’ pooled patient electronic health records database, corresponding to 10 hospitals in Maryland and Washington, DC. We used the Explore application on the Explorys platform (IBM, Armonk, NY) to obtain deidentified patient data from 2002 to 2016. This technology uses a server behind the firewall of participating MedStar Health institutions to capture information from patients in a privacy-protected and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant framework [9]. Medical charts containing the diagnosis of thyroid cancer [International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) 193 or 10th Revision (ICD-10) C73] and secondary neoplasia of the brain (ICD-9 198.3 or ICD-10 C79.3) were initially retrieved, for a total of 51 charts. Local electronic medical records were used to perform the chart reviews. Patients with medullary and anaplastic thyroid cancer were excluded, as were those with other active primary malignancies except squamous cell or basal cell skin carcinoma. The MedStar Health Research Institutional Review Board approved the study. Because this was an electronic medical records-based study, the need for informed consent was waived.

2. Statistical Analysis

All data extracted from electronic medical records were summarized by using descriptive statistics, such as means, SDs, and range, for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was implemented to calculate survival time from initial diagnosis of thyroid cancer and from the diagnosis of brain metastases, including median survival time and the survival rate at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. Survival curves were compared across treatment and demographic strata with log-rank tests and bivariate Cox regressions. Statistical significance was determined with a P value threshold of 0.05. Analyses were performed with R software, version 3.3 [10], using the survival, ggplot2, and R2wd packages [11–14].

3. Results

Between 2002 and 2016, a total of 9514 patients with a diagnosis of thyroid cancer were evaluated across all MedStar hospitals. Ninety-three percent of these cases were estimated to be DTC based on epidemiological data [15], which corresponds to 8848 cases. Of these patients, we identified 51 with DTC and secondary brain malignancy (Fig. 1). Patients with other primary malignancies or without appropriate follow-up data were excluded. Among the 24 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 14 (58.3%) were female and 10 (41.7%) were male. The mean age at diagnosis of DTC was 46.3 ± 15.2 years (range, 4 to 73 years). The baseline characteristics of patients are described in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Study design. aEstimated number of DTC based on epidemiological data (93%). Abbreviations: ATC, anaplastic thyroid cancer; MTC, medullary thyroid cancer.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics

Patient No. Sex Age at Diagnosis of Thyroid Cancer (y) Histology (Thyroid) Size of Thyroid Tumor (cm) TNM Classification a Time From Diagnosis to BM (y) ECOG Performance Status at Diagnosis of BM Survival After Diagnosis of BM (mo)
1 M 51 FVPTC + PDTC 7.6 T3N1bM1 1.4 1 18
2 F 61 FVPTC + PDTC 2.5 T2N0M0 0.6 2 27
3 M 43 FVPTC + TC 1 T1aN1aM0 13.1 1 5
4 F 43 FVPTC 0.9 T1aN0M1 0 1 119
5 F 54 FVPTC b 0 4 26
6 M 4 PTC 28.3 1 2
7 M 39 PTC 5 T3N0M0 13.4 2 21
8 F 29 PTC 13.8 No follow-up
9 M 42 PTC 1.1 T3N1bM0 2.6 2 62
10 M 48 PTC 3 T3N1bM1 5.2 1 108c
11 M 28 PTC 37.2 1 51
12 M 35 PTC 30.1 3 6
13 F 50 PTC 2.2 T2NxM1 8.8 1 36c
14 F 69 PDTC 2.5 T3N0M1 1.1 4 1
15 F 66 HTC 10.2 2 15
16 M 57 HTC+PDTC 6.5b T4aNxM1 0.5 1 1
17 F 54 FTC+PDTC 1.7 T1bN0M0 3.3 4 0
18 F 73 FTC 10.5 3 No follow-up
19 F 47 FTC 18.7 2 4
20 F 57 FTC 4 T4bNxM1 0.1 2 6
21 F 34 FTC 3 T2NxM0 12.1 3 26
22 F 30 FTC 15.3 4 2
23 F 45 FTC 4.2 T3N0M0 14.3 4 0
24 M 51 14.2 1 68
Mean ± SD 46.3 ± 15.2 3.23 ± 2.04 10.6 ± 10.4 19d

Abbreviations: BM, brain metastases; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; F, female; FVPTC, follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer; HTC, Hürthle cell thyroid cancer; M, male; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid cancer; TC, tall cell.

a

For patients whose original biopsy specimen was available.

b

No surgery done.

c

Alive at study completion.

d

Median survival time.

A. Pathology of the Thyroid Tumor and Extracranial Metastases

Fifteen patients had papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) (62.5%). Of these, 10 patients had classical variant and 5 had follicular variant of PTC, either pure (2 patients) or with areas of poor differentiation (2 patients) or tall cell features (1 patient). Seven patients had follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) (29.2%), of whom 2 had areas of poor differentiation and 2 patients had Hürthle cell features. One patient had poorly differentiated thyroid cancer, and 1 patient had no report from the original tumor but had confirmed brain metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer. In patients with brain metastases, individuals with PTC had a median survival time of 27.3 months compared with 4.7 months for patients with FTC and 1.06 months for the patient with poorly differentiated thyroid cancer. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

For patients in whom the original thyroidectomy pathology report was available, the mean size of the tumors was 3.2 ± 2.0 cm. We could not classify the initial stage (TNM classification) of all patients because nine patients (37.5%) had thyroid surgery and initial follow-up of thyroid cancer at other institutions, and the histology of the original tumor was not available. TNM classification of patients whose original pathology report was available is presented in Table 1.

Two patients did not have thyroidectomy. One patient presented with an inoperable tumor whose biopsy sample was compatible with poorly differentiated carcinoma with Hürthle cell features. The other patient had a diagnosis of thyroid nodules but was lost to follow-up; this patient returned several years later with a brain tumor that was compatible with metastatic thyroid carcinoma suggestive of the follicular variant of PTC based on biopsy (surgical specimen).

All but one patient had extracranial metastatic disease, notably in the lungs (21 patients) and bones (18 patients). The only patient who had no report of other metastatic sites had an irregular follow-up.

B. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of the Patients

Patients were classified according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status [16] at the time of diagnosis of brain metastases: grade 1 (nine patients), grade 2 (six patients), grade 3 (three patients), and grade 4 (five patients). For one patient the performance status could not be characterized.

C. Radioiodine Scanning and Treatment

The mean number of 131I treatments was 2.8 ± 1.6 (range, 0 to 6). The mean cumulative activity of 131I was 635.9 ± 415.9 mCi (23.5 ± 15.4 GBq). Only 1 of 24 patients (4.1%) had 131I uptake on diagnostic scans corresponding to the brain metastases. Two patients (8.3%) had 131I uptake on posttherapy scans (Fig. 2). All the patients who had thyroidectomy (91.6%) have received 131I therapy according to the staging of their tumors, not as a specific treatment of the brain lesions. Most of them had a high cumulative dose, suggesting persistent advanced metastatic disease.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A 6-mm lesion on the left parietal lobe on single-photon emission CT-CT (transverse view). Images of posttherapy radioiodine scan demonstrate focal intense radioiodine activity in the left cerebral cortex localized to the left parietal lobe with help of the low-dose CT (red arrows).

D. Diagnosis of Brain Metastases

Brain metastases were diagnosed 0 to 37 years after the initial diagnosis of thyroid cancer, with a mean ± SD of 10.6 ± 10.4 years. The mean age at diagnosis of brain metastases was 57.4 ± 11.2 years. The lesions were diagnosed by MRI for 12 patients, by CT for 6 patients, and by positron emission tomography-CT for 4 patients. For 2 patients no radiologic report was available, but the oncologist communicated the diagnosis of brain metastasis.

E. Features of Brain Lesions

Of the 24 patients, 14 had a single brain lesion, 4 had two to three lesions, and 5 patients had four or more lesions; for one patient there was no report of the number of lesions (Table 2). Among the 14 patients (58.3%) who had symptoms related to the presence of brain lesions, 7 (50%) presented with headache. The mean size of the brain lesions was 2.7 ± 2.0 cm (range, 0.4 to 10.0 cm). Molecular data for the tumors with brain metastasis were available for only one patient (patient 13).

Table 2.

Brain Metastases and Treatment Modalities

Patient No. Localization of BM Number of BM Size of BM (cm) Surgery WBRT SRS TKI Survival After BM (mo)
1 Right occipital lobe, central sulcus, and dura mater Multiple 1 N N N Y 18
2 Cerebellum 1 0.7 N N Y N 27
3 Parietal lobe, thalamus, cerebellum Multiple 2.8 Y Y Y Y 5
4 Biparietal region; infratemporal fossa Multiple 3.5 Y Y N Y 119
5 Frontal lobe 1 10.0 Y N N N 26
6 Frontal lobe 1 0.4 N N N Y 2
7 Intraventricular 1 2 N Y Y Y 21
8 Right frontal lobe 1 4.2 Y N Y N N/A
9 Left frontal lobe 1 0.7 N N Y Y 62
10 Occipital lobe, temporal lobe, cerebellum 3 3.6 Y Y N Y 108a
11 Temporal, occipital and parietal lobes Multiple 1.9 N N Y Y 51
12 NA N Y N N 6
13 Parasagittal occipital falcine 1 2.8 Y Y N Y 36a
14 No results on chart 3 N Y N N 1
15 Suboccipital region 1 3.8 Y N Y N 15
16 Right and left frontal lobe 2 3.2 N N N N 1
17 Parietal-occipital region 1 2.5 N N N N 0
18 Lateral ventricle 1 N N N N NA
19 Right frontoparietal region and left frontal region Multiple 3.2 Y Y N N 4
20 Cerebellum 1 1.8 N Y N Y 6
21 Interhemispheric fissure 1 1 N N N Y 26
22 Pituitary 1 0.8 Y N N N 2
23 Parietal lobe 1 3.6 N N N N 0
24 Frontal parietal region, temporal region and cerebellum 3 3.2 Y Y Y Y 68

“Multiple” refers to more than three lesions.

Abbreviations: BM, brain metastases; N, no; NA, not available; Y, yes.

a

Alive at study completion.

F. Modalities of Treatment of Brain Metastases

Patients were treated with combinations of surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and/or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Of 24 patients, 10 (41.7%) had surgery, 8 (33.3%) had SRS, and 10 (41.7%) had WBRT (Table 2). Patients undergoing surgery had a median survival time of 27.3 months, compared with 6.8 months for those who did not undergo surgery. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.15) (Fig. 3a). Patients who received SRS had a median survival time of 52.5 months in comparison with 6.7 months for those who did not receive SRS. Again, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.11) (Fig. 3b). For WBRT, no difference was noted in the survival of patients receiving or not receiving this therapy (21.3 months vs 19.1 months, respectively; P = 0.50) (Fig. 3c).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves of death from date of brain metastases by neurosurgery (a), SRS (b), and WBRT (c).

Twelve patients (50%) were treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Of these patients, 8 were treated with a single agent and 4 patients received two or three agents in sequence (Table 3). Patients who were treated with TKIs had a median survival time of 27.2 months in comparison with 4.7 months for those who were not treated with a TKI. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4). The use of TKIs reduced the odds of death by approximately 73%. The log-rank test confirmed that the Kaplan-Meier curves were statistically different.

Table 3.

Therapy With TKIs

Patient No. TKI Use Before BM Diagnosis Survival After Diagnosis of BM (mo)
1 Sunitinib Yes 18
3 Sunitinib No 4.8
4 Sorafenib No 118.8
6 Sunitinib Yes 2.4
7 Sorafenib No 21
9 Sorafenib,a lenvatinib No 62.4
10 Sorafenib, lenvatinib No 108b
11 Sunitinib, sorafenib, lenvatinib No 51.6
13 Sorafenib, entrectinib, crizotinib No 36b
20 Lenvatinib No 6
21 Lenvatinib No 26.4
24 Sunitinib No 68.4

Abbreviation: BM, brain metastases.

a

Previous use of vemurafenib.

b

Alive at study completion.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Kaplan-Meier curves of death from date of brain metastases by use of TKI.

G. Overall Survival

The median survival time of the entire group after diagnosis of DTC was 174 months or 14.3 years (Fig. 5). The median survival time after diagnosis of brain metastases was 19 months (Fig. 6). Overall survival rates at 12, 24, and 60 months were 92.7%, 87.5%, and 70.8%, respectively. Two patients were alive at 9 years (108 months) and 3 years (36 months) after their diagnosis of thyroid cancer.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Kaplan-Meier (Km) curve of time of death from date of thyroid cancer diagnosis.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Kaplan-Meier (Km) curve of time of death from date of brain metastases diagnosis.

4. Discussion

This is a retrospective study examining patients with brain metastases from DTC in all MedStar Health Institutions, the largest healthcare provider in Maryland and Washington, DC. In this population, we found 24 cases of confirmed brain metastases from DTC, corresponding to an estimated prevalence of 0.3%.

There are few reports of the prevalence of brain metastases of DTC in the literature [3, 4]. In 1997, Chiu et al. [3] reported a 1.2% prevalence of brain metastases in a subgroup of DTC in a tertiary referral oncology center during a period of 51 years. Another retrospective study reported a 1.4% prevalence of brain metastases of DTC in a large tertiary referral center over 23 years [4]. In our population, during a period of 15 years, the prevalence of brain metastases from DTC was 0.3%. This number is considerably lower than that observed in previous studies, possibly because it includes heterogeneous hospitals across our organization, composed of seven regional hospitals, one rehabilitation hospital, one university hospital (MedStar Georgetown University Hospital), and one tertiary hospital (MedStar Washington Hospital Center). An alternative explanation for the low prevalence of brain metastases in our study is the exclusion of 23 patients with other concomitant malignancies. We applied this exclusion criterion when it was not possible to determine which cancer was responsible for the patient’s brain metastases.

Given the rarity of brain metastases in DTC, there are no large retrospective studies about the prognosis of brain metastases, but in various studies >150 cases have been reported [17]. Chiu et al. [3] reported a median survival time of 12.4 months for the subgroup of 32 patients with DTC. In 2003, McWilliams et al. [6] described 16 cases with brain metastases of thyroid cancer over 25 years, including 14 patients with DTC. The median survival time after the diagnosis was 17.4 months, and 85% of the patients died of their extracranial disease. In another study [4], the median survival time was 7.1 months, but patients treated with surgery and/or SRS had a better outcome, with a median survival time of 11.9 months. The most important prognostic factor to select patients for more aggressive treatments was a performance status ≤2. This finding was corroborated by a recent survival analysis of patients with brain metastases from thyroid cancer [18]. In that study 37 patients with DTC diagnosed with brain metastases were divided into three prognostic groups. The authors characterized four good prognostic factors (age ≤ 60 years, performance status ≤ 2, ≤3 brain metastases sites, and no extracranial metastases before brain metastases). The median survival after brain metastases was 8.8 months for the entire group. For the subgroup with age ≤60 years and more than two good prognostic factors, the median survival time was 32.8 months. Compared with those studies, the median survival time in our study was higher (19 months), which can be attributed to the use of TKIs combined with local treatment of the metastatic lesions. In this study, 15 patients (62.5%) had a performance status ≤2.

With regard to histopathology, among retrospective studies [3, 4, 6, 7, 18], small series [19–24], and case reports [25–28], there is a predominance of brain metastases from PTC. This is in accordance with its higher prevalence but also highlights the fact that PTC is not universally an indolent malignancy. Our study corroborates these data, as 13 of 24 patients (54%) had PTC, 8 of them the classical variant of PTC.

131I can be considered for the treatment of brain metastases from DTC if the lesions concentrate radioactive iodine [8]. Few data address the efficacy of 131I, and this treatment has been associated with important adverse effects, such as sudden hemorrhage into the brain lesion [29] and cerebral edema [30]. Therefore, 131I therapy for brain metastases should be considered in the context of the appropriateness of surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery, and when the brain metastases have appropriate 131I uptake [17]. Ideally, the maximum prescribed activity of 131I should be dosimetrically determined. Patients can be prepared for 131I therapy with thyroid hormone withdrawal or recombinant human TSH. The shorter exposure of the brain metastases to elevated TSH stimulation from recombinant human TSH injections potentially minimizes the possibility of growth of the tumor and the possibility of cerebral edema. Nevertheless, the use of steroids (and less frequently glycerol and/or mannitol) immediately before 131I therapy has been recommended to minimize cerebral edema; treatment should be continued for a substantial period of time after administration of the therapeutic prescribed activity of 131I [17]. In our cohort, only two patients (8.3%) had 131I uptake corresponding to the brain metastases. We believe that brain lesions usually do not demonstrate substantial 131I uptake, and the use of RAI for both diagnostic and therapeutic reasons may be less effective. In the presence of other previous or synchronous distant metastases, as documented here and in other studies [3, 4, 18], diagnostic imaging of the brain is warranted, regardless of the presence of neurologic symptoms. In our study, almost 60% of the patients had symptoms related to the brain lesions, suggesting advanced disease, although brain metastases may be asymptomatic. The fact that high-risk patients are not routinely screened for brain metastases may also be responsible for the low prevalence observed in our study. Unless otherwise contraindicated, contrast-enhanced MRI is the screening modality of choice to exclude the presence of brain parenchymal metastatic disease [31]. In our study, the brain lesions were detected by MRI in 50% of the patients, followed by CT in 25%. Given the normal glucose uptake of the brain, positron emission tomography-CT may underdiagnose some brain lesions, so other cross-sectional imaging studies, such as MRI and CT, may better characterize these lesions.

The decision-making for selecting the type of treatment is driven both by patient factors, such as age and systemic disease burden, and by tumor factors, such as number and location of lesions and, more recently, the biology of the tumor based on molecular testing. The standard of care is the neurosurgical resection of individual symptomatic brain metastases. In our patients, the use of image-guided neuronavigation systems may have contributed to more effective procedures, especially in the last decade.

Radiotherapy modalities include WBRT, SRS, and focused external-beam radiotherapy [5]. WBRT has been widely used to treat various patients with multiple brain metastases, mainly for palliative purposes [32]. Radiation-induced dementia is a serious complication that may occur 6 to 12 months after radiation, and this potential adverse effect should be considered for patients who are more likely to live longer [33]. In our study, one patient declined WBRT specifically because of concern for his cognitive deterioration. Stereotactic radiosurgery, either Gamma Knife® (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) or CyberKnife® (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA), has been associated with high local control rates, but factors such as functional status of the patient, systemic disease control, size and location of the lesions, and tumor histology directly affect the response rate. Clinical judgment and patient preference must help guide treatment decisions between surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery [33]. There are few data regarding the outcomes of SRS for brain metastases of thyroid cancer. Bernad et al. [34], in a retrospective multi-institutional study that included 23 patients with thyroid cancer, found that patients who received SRS had a median survival time of 37.4 months in comparison with 12.3 months for those not treated with this technique (P = 0.29). Likewise, in our cohort, we found that patients receiving SRS had longer survival than those who did not receive this therapy (52.5 months vs 6.7 months, respectively), without statistical significance (P = 0.11). In our study, this trend was not observed for patients that received WBRT.

Systemic control of the disease clearly affects the overall survival of patients with brain metastases from DTC as of any other malignancy. In accordance with previous studies [3, 4, 18], we observed that patients with DTC usually present with extracranial metastases at the diagnosis of brain metastases. The use of TKIs for patients with radioiodine-refractory DTC has significantly improved progression-free survival [35–37]. In the current study, 12 patients (50%) were treated with different types of TKIs because of the widespread nature of radioiodine refractory disease. No intracranial hemorrhage was reported. The use of TKIs was the only treatment statistically significant for survival after development of brain metastases. Nevertheless, this finding must be interpreted with caution because of a possible selection bias: TKIs are not usually prescribed for patients with a poor performance status. In addition, the issue of whether TKIs cross the blood-brain barrier is not completely understood.

Data are very limited about the effectiveness of TKIs in brain metastasis from DTC. Shen et al. [38] published a case report describing good clinical and radiological response of brain metastases of FTC to sorafenib. There are more data for other malignancies. Koutras et al. [39] found that sunitinib was effective and safe for a patient with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Another study showed that lenvatinib was effective in vitro and in vivo for the treatment of glioblastoma, thus suggesting good penetration in the blood-brain barrier of mice [40]. Several prospective clinical trials have focused on malignancies that commonly metastasize to the brain, such as melanoma and lung and breast cancers. First-generation TKIs seem to have limited blood-brain barrier penetration; however, next-generation TKIs, such as osimertinib and ceritinib, may have better ability to cross the blood-brain barrier [32]. Entrectinib is a new TKI targeted at NTRK, ROS1, and ALK fusions that was developed to cross the blood-brain barrier. In one of our patients (patient 13), an EZR (exon10)/ROS1 (exon14) fusion was identified in the brain specimen. This appeared to be the first description of an EZR-ROS1 fusion in DTC. After 4 weeks of therapy with entrectinib, her brain metastasis and a rib lesion remained stable, and a periaortic nodule and a liver metastasis resolved; this corresponds to a partial response by RECIST1.1 [41]. Other drugs, such as the RET inhibitors LOXO-292 and BLU-667, are under investigation [42, 43] and may be more relevant because RET/PTC are the most commonly observed fusions in DTC.

Our study has several limitations inherent to its retrospective nature and number of patients. However, considering the rarity of brain metastases from DTC, it is unlikely that a prospective study could be conducted. The number of brain metastases from DTC may be underestimated in our population because of the number of patients excluded as a result of other concomitant primary malignancies. Moreover, the use of clinical databases supposes the correct use of diagnostic codes for accurate patient identification. Another limitation of our study is the lack of molecular data from the brain lesions for most patients. Yet this study has the strength of bringing real-world data from patients who are being followed at a referral center and community hospitals. Furthermore, it gives important insight into the impact of novel therapies, including modern surgical techniques, SRS and TKIs.

5. Conclusion

The prevalence of brain metastases of DTC in MedStar Health institutions was 0.3% over 15 years. This diagnosis is associated with high mortality, but advances in surgical techniques and radiation therapy may change this scenario. In our selected population, the use of TKIs was the only therapy that improved the survival rates. Further studies in this area are warranted.

Acknowledgments

Disclosure Summary: D.V.N. is a speaker and consultant for Jubilant DraxImage. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

131I

iodine-131

DTC

differentiated thyroid carcinoma

FTC

follicular thyroid cancer

ICD-9

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

ICD-10

International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision

PTC

papillary thyroid cancer

SRS

stereotactic radiosurgery

TKI

tyrosine kinase inhibitor

WBRT

whole-brain radiotherapy

References and Notes

  • 1. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE. Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(14):2865–2872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Parker LN, Wu SY, Kim DD, Kollin J, Prasasvinichai S. Recurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma presenting as a focal neurologic deficit. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(10):1985–1987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chiu AC, Delpassand ES, Sherman SI. Prognosis and treatment of brain metastases in thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(11):3637–3642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Henriques de Figueiredo B, Godbert Y, Soubeyran I, Carrat X, Lagarde P, Cazeau AL, Italiano A, Sargos P, Kantor G, Loiseau H, Bonichon F. Brain metastases from thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study of 21 patients. Thyroid. 2014;24(2):270–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hardesty DA, Nakaji P. The Current and Future Treatment of Brain Metastases. Front Surg. 2016;3:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. McWilliams RR, Giannini C, Hay ID, Atkinson JL, Stafford SL, Buckner JC. Management of brain metastases from thyroid carcinoma: a study of 16 pathologically confirmed cases over 25 years. Cancer. 2003;98(2):356–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lee HS, Yoo H, Lee SH, Gwak HS, Shin SH. Clinical characteristics and follow-up of intracranial metastases from thyroid cancer. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(12):2185–2194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, Schuff KG, Sherman SI, Sosa JA, Steward DL, Tuttle RM, Wartofsky L. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kaelber DC, Foster W, Gilder J, Love TE, Jain AK. Patient characteristics associated with venous thromboembolic events: a cohort study using pooled electronic health record data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):965–972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [computer program]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.
  • 11.A Package for Survival Analysis in S’ [computer program]. Version Version 2.382015.
  • 12. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York: Springer; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.R2wd. Write MS-Word documents from R. R package [computer program]. Version Version 1.52012.
  • 14. Wickham H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Figge J. Epidemiology of thyroid cancer In: Wartofsky L, Van Nostrand D, eds. Thyroid Cancer. 3rd edNew York: Springer; 2016:9–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Van Nostrand D. I-131 treatment of distant metastases In: Wartofsky L, and Van Nostrand D, eds. Thyroid Cancer. 3rd edNew York: Springer; 2016:595–627. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Choi J, Kim JW, Keum YS, Lee IJ. The largest known survival analysis of patients with brain metastasis from thyroid cancer based on prognostic groups. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0154739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Venkatesh S, Leavens ME, Samaan NA. Brain metastases in patients with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma: study of 11 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1990;16(5):448–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hjiyiannakis P, Jefferies S, Harmer CL. Brain metastases in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1996;8(5):327–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Misaki T, Iwata M, Kasagi K, Konishi J. Brain metastasis from differentiated thyroid cancer in patients treated with radioiodine for bone and lung lesions. Ann Nucl Med. 2000;14(2):111–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ikekubo K, Hino M, Ito H, Hirao K, Ueshima M, Tanaka T, Kobayashi H, Ishihara T, Kurahachi H. [Seven cases of brain metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma]. Kaku Igaku. 2000;37(4):349–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Salvati M, Frati A, Rocchi G, Masciangelo R, Antonaci A, Gagliardi FM, Delfini R. Single brain metastasis from thyroid cancer: report of twelve cases and review of the literature. J Neurooncol. 2001;51(1):33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kim IY, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Gamma knife radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors from thyroid cancer. J Neurooncol. 2009;93(3):355–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Goolden AW, Mclaughlin JE, Valentine AR, Pease C. Solitary cerebral metastasis from a papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Postgrad Med J. 1990;66(772):127–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pacak K, Sweeney DC, Wartofsky L, Mark AS, Punja U, Azzam CJ, Burman KD. Solitary cerebellar metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma: a case report. Thyroid. 1998;8(4):327–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Aguiar PH, Agner C, Tavares FR, Yamaguchi N. Unusual brain metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma: case report. Neurosurgery. 2001;49(4):1008–1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Miranda ER, Padrão EL, Silva BC, De Marco L, Sarquis MS. Papillary thyroid carcinoma with brain metastases: an unusual 10-year-survival case. Thyroid. 2010;20(6):657–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Holmquest DL, Lake P. Sudden hemorrhage in metastatic thyroid carcinoma of the brain during treatment with iodine-131. J Nucl Med. 1976;17(4):307–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Datz FL. Cerebral edema following iodine-131 therapy for thyroid carcinoma metastatic to the brain. J Nucl Med. 1986;27(5):637–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Barajas RF Jr, Cha S. Metastasis in adult brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2016;26(4):601–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Brown PD, Ahluwalia MS, Khan OH, Asher AL, Wefel JS, Gondi V. Whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: evolution or revolution? J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(5):483–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Smith ML, Lee JY. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastasis. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22(3):E5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Bernad DM, Sperduto PW, Souhami L, Jensen AW, Roberge D. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases from primary thyroid cancers. J Neurooncol. 2010;98(2):249–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Brose MS, Nutting CM, Jarzab B, Elisei R, Siena S, Bastholt L, de la Fouchardiere C, Pacini F, Paschke R, Shong YK, Sherman SI, Smit JW, Chung J, Kappeler C, Peña C, Molnár I, Schlumberger MJ; DECISION investigators . Sorafenib in radioactive iodine-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9940):319–328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Schlumberger M, Tahara M, Wirth LJ, Robinson B, Brose MS, Elisei R, Habra MA, Newbold K, Shah MH, Hoff AO, Gianoukakis AG, Kiyota N, Taylor MH, Kim SB, Krzyzanowska MK, Dutcus CE, de las Heras B, Zhu J, Sherman SI. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(7):621–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Bikas A, Kundra P, Desale S, Mete M, O’Keefe K, Clark BG, Wray L, Gandhi R, Barett C, Jelinek JS, Wexler JA, Wartofsky L, Burman KD. Phase 2 clinical trial of sunitinib as adjunctive treatment in patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(3):373–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Shen Y, Ruan M, Luo Q, Yu Y, Lu H, Zhu R, Chen L. Brain metastasis from follicular thyroid carcinoma: treatment with sorafenib. Thyroid. 2012;22(8):856–860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Koutras AK, Krikelis D, Alexandrou N, Starakis I, Kalofonos HP. Brain metastasis in renal cell cancer responding to sunitinib. Anticancer Res. 2007;27(6C):4255–4257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Li J, Zou CL, Zhang ZM, Lv LJ, Qiao HB, Chen XJ. A multi‑targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib for the treatment of mice with advanced glioblastoma. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(5):7105–7111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Liu SV, Macke LA, Colton BS, Imran SS, Christiuansen J, Cho-Maneval E, Hornby Z, Multani PSResponse to Entrectinib in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with a ROS1 Fusion. JCO Precis Oncol 2017;Dec 8(1):1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42. Drilon A, Subbiah V, Oxnard GR, Bauer TM, Velcheti V, Lakhani NJ, Besse B, Park K, Patel JD, Cabanillas ME, Johnson ML, Reckamp KL, Boni V, Loong HHF, Schlumberger M, Solomon B, Cruickshank S, Rothenberg SM, Shah MH, Wirth LJ.. A phase 1 study of LOXO-292, a potent and highly selective RET inhibitor, in patients with RET-altered cancers. J Clin Oncol. 201836(15)(Suppl):102–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Subbiah V, Gainor JF, Rahal R, Brubaker JD, Kim JL, Maynard M, Hu W, Cao Q, Sheets MP, Wilson D, Wilson KJ. Precision targeted therapy with BLU-667 for RET-driven cancers. Cancer Discov. 2018 Jan 1:CD-18. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Endocrine Society are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES