Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2018 Dec 28;17(2):2400–2408. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9871

MicroRNA-372 functions as a tumor suppressor in cell invasion, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting ATAD2 in renal cell carcinoma

Shiqi Ji 1,*, Xiaolin Su 2,*, Haijian Zhang 1, Zhixing Han 1, Yuqian Zhao 1, Qingjun Liu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6350190  PMID: 30719113

Abstract

In recent years, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has exhibited an increasing incidence and mortality rate worldwide. Accumulating evidence has identified that microRNAs (miRNAs) function as negative or positive regulators of many malignant tumors; however, the roles of miR-372 in RCC remain unclear. The focus of the present study was the functions of miR-372 in RCC metastasis and EMT. Data revealed that miR-372 expression levels were significantly downregulated in RCC tissue samples and cells. Moreover, the decreased expression levels were strongly associated with the poor survival rates and adverse clinical characteristics of RCC patients. Accordingly, miR-372 overexpression markedly inhibited RCC cell invasion, migration and EMT. In terms of the potential mechanisms, ATAD2, the expression of which was inversely correlated with miR-372 expression in RCC, was identified as a direct functional target of miR-372. Notably, ATAD2 silence exerted suppressive functions in RCC cells, being similar to the effects of miR-372 overexpression. In conclusion, findings of this study indicate that miR-372 repressed RCC EMT and metastasis via targeting ATAD2, suggesting that the miR-372/ATAD2 axis may be therapeutic biomarkers for RCC.

Keywords: renal cell carcinoma, miR-372, migration, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ATAD2

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), accounting for approximately 3% of human malignant tumors, is a common type of adult kidney tumor (1). Globally, over 260,000 patients are diagnosed with kidney tumor annually and over 116,000 patients succumb to the disease (2). The 5-year survival rate for RCC patients in advanced stages remains poor due to metastasis or recurrence (3). Generally, the standard therapies for RCC involve nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy (4,5). However, these types of therapies are not expected to have curative effects as they only slightly extend progression-free survival (6). Therefore, further understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying RCC metastasis and progression is of great importance to identify novel prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers for RCC.

miRNAs are a class of conserved non-coding RNAs, serving important roles in regulating gene expression levels via directly targeting the mRNA 3′-UTR to induce translation inhibition or mRNA degradation (7,8). miRNAs have been confirmed to be involved in different kinds of cellular processes, such as apoptosis, metabolism, and differentiation (9–11). The study of miRNAs has provided a new direction in our understanding of the tumorigenic mechanism of RCC. Additionally, aberrant expression levels of various miRNAs have been observed in RCC. For instance, Song et al reported that miR-384 could repress RCC cell invasion and growth via regulating astrocyte elevated gene 1 (12). Wang et al reported that migration and invasion abilities of RCC were suppressed by miR-182 through the regulation of IGF1R (13). Hu et al revealed that miR-138 repressed RCC cell invasion and proliferation by mediating SOX9 (14). Thus, miRNAs may be underlying diagnostic markers for RCC.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a pathological and physiological process where epithelial cells lose their polarity and cell-cell adhesion signature, acquiring the mesenchymal characteristics (15,16). During this progress, the expression levels of epithelial markers, such as E-cadherin, increase, while the expression levels of mesenchymal markers, such as vimentin, decrease (17). EMT plays a critical role in many aspects of tumor behavior, including metastasis (18). Thus, further investigation is essential to better understand the mechanisms underlying EMT progression in RCC.

ATAD2 (ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 2), also known as AAA+ nuclear coregulator cancer associated (ANCCA), is a member of the AAA+ ATPase family (19). ATAD2 contains both an ATPase domain and a bromodomain. Additionally, ATAD2 maps to chromosome 8q24, which is the most commonly amplified region in multiple tumors (20,21). The special structures of ATAD2 indicated that it was implicated in the regulation of genome, including cell differentiation, apoptosis, division and proliferation (22,23). Recently, dysregulation of ATAD2 has been found in various tumors, playing significant roles in tumor progression. For example, ATAD2 overexpression was associated with prognosis and progression in colorectal cancer (24); ATAD2 overexpression in gastric cancer served as a poor prognostic biomarker (25). Thus, studies have revealed that ATAD2 manifests oncogenic functions in various malignancies. However, the significance of ATAD2 in RCC remains uncertain.

Materials and methods

RCC clinical tissue specimens

Fifty-two pairs of RCC tissue specimens and matched non-cancerous tissues were collected from RCC patients who underwent radical nephrectomy in Beijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University (Beijing, China) between September 2015 and June 2017. None of the patients had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to the surgery. All the tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen after resection and stored at −80°C for further assays.

Written consent was obtained from the RCC patients involved in the current study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Beijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University.

Cell lines and cell culture

Five human RCC cell lines (Caki-1, 786-O, A498, ACHN and Caki-2) and the immortalized normal human renal proximal tubule epithelial cell line HK-2 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). All the RCC cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) while HK-2 was cultured in keratinocyte serum-free medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Both culture media contained 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). All the cells were kept in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Cell transfection

The miR-372 mimics, inhibitors, ATAD2 overexpression plasmids and ATAD2 siRNA were produced by GenePharmaCo. (Shanghai, China) and transfected into RCC cells using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in line with the manufacturer's protocol. The cells were harvested 48 h post-transfection for further assays.

RT-qPCR

TRIzol (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was applied to isolate the total RNAs from RCC tissues and cultured cells following the manufacturers' protocol. Reverse transcription for cDNA was performed using the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Then, cDNA was amplified using a SYBR-Green mix kit and the ABI 7900 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Primer sequences are shown in Table I. GAPDH was used as endogenous controls for ATAD2 and EMT-related genes. U6 served as the internal control for miR-372. The relative expression levels were determined using the 2−∆∆Cq method (26). RT-qPCR was performed with the following thermocycling conditions: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, annealing at 50°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec.

Table I.

Primer sequences for RT-qPCR.

Primer Sequence
miR-372 F: 5′-AGCCTAAAGTGCTGCGACATT-3′
R: 5′-GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′
U6 F: 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′
R: 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′
ATAD2 F: 5′-GGAATCCCAAACCACTGGACA-3′
R: 5′-GGTAGCGTCGTCGTAAAGCACA-3′
GAPDH F: 5′-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAG-3′
R: 5′-GAAGATGGTGATGGGAT-3′
E-cadherin F: 5′-CACCTGGAGAGAGGCCATGT-3′
R: 5′-TGGGAAACATGAGCAGCTCT-3′
Vimentin F: 5′-AGCTGCAGGCTCAGATTCAGGA-3′
R: 5′-CGGTTGGCAGCCTCAGAGAGGT-3′
Open in a new tab

F, forward; R, reverse; U6, small nuclear RNA, snRNA; ATAD2, ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 2; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Transwell assays

Transwell chamber (8.0 µm pore size, Corning Incorporated) was applied to determine the RCC cell invasion and migration abilities with or without the Matrigel (Corning Incorporated) being precoated. For invasion assay, 1×104 RCC cells in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium were placed into top chambers of the inserts which had been precoated with Matrigel. Then, culture medium containing 10% FBS, as a chemoattractant, was added into bottom chambers. After incubation at 37°C for 48 h in a 5% CO2 atmosphere, the cells that remained on the top side of the inserts were removed using a cotton swab while the cells that invaded the bottom side were fixed with 0.1% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min at room temperature. Then, the stained cells were counted under a microscope (IX53; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) from five randomly selected visual fields. The difference between the migration and invasion assays was that the insert was not plated with Matrigel for the migration assays.

Western blotting

Cultured cells were harvested and lysed with RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) containing the protease inhibitors (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) on ice for 15 min. The BCA method (BCA protein assay kit; Beyotime) was used to determine the concentration of the proteins. Proteins (40 µg) were then separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBST at room temperature for 2 h, followed by incubation overnight at 4°C with appropriate primary antibodies which were as follows: antibodies against ATAD2 (1:1000, ab118664, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), Vimentin (1:1000, ab92547, Abcam), E-cadherin (1:1000, ab15148, Abcam) and GAPDH (1:1000, ab9485, Abcam). After incubation with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000, ab6721, Abcam) for 2 h at room temperature, the protein bands were visualized using a chemiluminescent imaging system (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Densitometry analysis of the protein blots was conducted using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). GAPDH was used as an internal control.

Luciferase reporter assays

The wild-type (WT) or mutant (MUT) ATAD2−3′UTR which contained the miR-372 binding sites was inserted into the luciferase genes in the pGL3 vectors (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). RCC cells were co-transfected with pGL3-WT ATAD2−3′-UTR or pGL3-MUT ATAD2−3′-UTR and miR-372 mimics. The luciferase activities were detected with the dual-luciferase reporter assay kit (Promega) 48 h after the transfections.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Student's t-test, ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc analysis were applied, where appropriate. A paired Student's t-test was performed to analyze the paired data. For analysis on clinical correlation between miR-372 expression and RCC patients' clinicopathological features, Pearson's Chi-square test was used. Spearman's correlation method was applied to estimate the correlations between mRNA and miRNA. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to determine the survival rates, and the log-rank test was performed to compare the difference between the survival curves. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant difference.

Results

Aberrant expression levels of miR-372 and ATAD2 in RCC

To validate whether miR-372 functionally modulates ATAD2 expression levels in RCC, firstly, we measured miR-372 and ATAD2 expression levels in RCC tissue samples. Results revealed that RCC tissues presented a lower miR-372 expression level in comparison with the non-tumor tissues (Fig. 1A), whereas, the expression levels of ATAD2 in RCC tissues were prominently upregulated when compared to the paired adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1B). Similarly, significantly decreased miR-372 expression levels were detected in RCC cells as compared to the normal renal cell HK-2 (Fig. 1C). We further evaluated ATAD2 expression levels in RCC cells. As shown in Fig. 1D, ATAD2 expression levels were found to be markedly increased in RCC cells compared to HK-2. Additionally, the correlation between miR-372 and ATAD2 expression levels in RCC tissues was analyzed. The finding of Spearman's correlation rank test demonstrated a negative correlation between miR-372 and ATAD2 expression levels (Fig. 1E).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

miR-372 is downregulated and ATAD2 is upregulated in RCC. (A) miR-372 expression levels in normal and RCC tissues. (B) ATAD2 expression levels in RCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues were detected by RT-qPCR. (C) miR-372 expression levels in RCC and normal renal cells. (D) ATAD2 expression levels in RCC and normal renal cells. (E) Spearman's correlation analysis between the miR-372 and ATAD2 expression levels in RCC tissues. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

miR-372 suppresses RCC cell migration and invasion

To investigate the functional roles of miR-372 in RCC progression, we performed miR-372 inhibited or overexpressed assays in Caki-1 and 786-O cells, which had the relatively highest or lowest endogenous miR-372 expression levels, by transfecting the miR-372 mimics or inhibitor into 786-O or Caki-1 cells. Successful overexpression or knockdown of miR-372 in 786-O or Caki-1 cells was confirmed using RT-qPCR (Fig. 2A and 2C). Then, Transwell assays were conducted to confirm the functions of miR-372 in RCC cell migration and invasion. The findings showed that miR-372 overexpression significantly reduced 786-O cell migration and invasion (Fig. 2B). By contrast, there was a significant increase in cell invasion and migration of Caki-1 treated with miR-372 inhibitor (Fig. 2D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

miR-372 suppresses cell invasion and migration in RCC cells. (A) miR-372 expression levels in 786-O cells with transfection of miR-372 mimics. (B) Cell invasion and migration were measured by Transwell assays in 786-O treated with miR-372 mimics. (C) miR-372 expression levels in Caki-1 cells with transfection of miR-372 inhibitor. (D) Cell invasion and migration were measured by Transwell assays in Caki-1 cells with transfection of miR-372 inhibitor. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

miR-372 suppresses RCC cell EMT

Next, we monitored alterations of EMT markers, including Vimentin and E-Cadherin, to investigate the functions of miR-372 in EMT of RCC cells. As expected, results of RT-qPCR and western blot analysis both demonstrated that E-Cadherin expression levels were obviously increased, whereas the Vimentin expression levels were markedly reduced in miR-372 overexpressed 786-O cells (Fig. 3A and B). By contrast, Vimentin was upregulated in miR-372-suppressed Caki-1 cells, while E-Cadherin was prominently downregulated (Fig. 3C and D). Our data revealed that miR-372 overexpression could suppress the RCC cell EMT progression.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

miR-372 suppressed EMT in RCC cells. (A and B) miR-372 overexpression in 786-O cells elevated the E-cadherin expression levels and reduced the Vimentin expression levels. (C and D) Inhibition of miR-372 in Caki-1 cells downregulated the E-cadherin expression levels and enhanced the Vimentin expression levels. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

ATAD2 is a direct target of miR-372 in RCC cell lines

The significant impact of miR-372 on the metastasis of RCC cells prompted us to investigate the mechanisms underlying its functional effects. The data from Targetscan database revealed that ATAD2 had complementary binding sites for miR-372 (Fig. 4A). Then, dual-luciferase reporter assays were performed to validate the association between ATAD2 and miR-372. The results showed that miR-372 significantly reduced the luciferase activities of ATAD2−3′UTR-WT without having obvious effects on that of ATAD2−3′UTR-Mut (Fig. 4B). We also investigated whether miR-372 could regulate the ATAD2 expression levels in RCC cells. The results of RT-qPCR indicated that miR-372 overexpression significantly reduced ATAD2 expression levels in 786-O cells (Fig. 4C) while inhibition of miR-372 significantly elevated ATAD2 expression levels in Caki-1 cells (Fig. 4D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

ATAD2 is the direct target of miR-372 in RCC. (A) The putative binding sites of miR-372 in the ATAD2 3′-UTR. (B) The luciferase activities of the ATAD2 3′UTR was detected by luciferase reporter gene assays in RCC cells which were cotransfected with wild-type ATAD2 3′UTR or mutational type ATAD2 3′UTR and miR-372 mimics, respectively. (C) ATAD2 expression in 786-O treated with miR-372 mimics. (D) ATAD2 expression in Caki-1 treated with miR-372 inhibitor. *P<0.05.

ATAD2 mediated the biological functions of miR-372 in RCC cell invasion and migration

Next, we performed rescue experiments to verify that miR-372 inhibited RCC metastasis ability by directly reducing ATAD2. First, we obtained miR-372 overexpressed 786-O cells or miR-372 suppressed Caki-1 cells by transfecting miR-372 mimics or inhibitor. Then, to verify that the biological functions of miR-372 in RCC was modulated by ATAD2, we transfected ATAD2 overexpressing vector or ATAD2 siRNA into miR-372 overexpressed 786-O cells or miR-372 suppressed Caki-1 cells, inducing an increase or decrease of ATAD2 expression (Fig. 5A and B). Next, Transwell assays were performed to determine the migration and invasion capacities. Findings demonstrated that ATAD2 upregulation markedly enhanced the invasion and migration abilities of miR-372 overexpressed 786-O cells (Fig. 5C). On the contrary, knockdown of ATAD2 dramatically reduced the invasion and migration abilities of miR-372 suppressed Caki-1 cells (Fig. 5D). miR-372 inhibited RCC cell EMT by regulating ATAD2. We further investigated the functions of ATAD2 in mediating the functional roles of miR-372 in RCC EMT progress by qRT-PCR and western blots. As expected, in miR-372 overexpressed 786-O cells, E-cadherin expression levels were significantly reduced and vimentin expression levels were prominently enhanced by ATAD2 overexpression (Fig. 6A and 6B). However, ATAD2 silence significantly elevated the E-cadherin expression levels and decreased the vimentin expression levels in miR-372 suppressed Caki-1 cells (Fig. 6C and D). The data indicated that miR-372 suppressed RCC cell EMT process by regulation of ATAD2.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Altering expression of ATAD2 partly reverses miR-372-mediated functions in RCC cell invasion and migration. (A and B) ATAD2 expression levels in miR-372-overexpressed 786-O cells and miR-372-suppressed Caki-1 cells, which were cotransfected with ATAD2 overexpression plasmid or ATAD2 siRNA respectively. (C and D) Transwell assays were conducted to determine cell invasion and migration abilities of (C) miR-372-overexpressed 786-O cells and (D) miR-372-suppressed Caki-1 cells, which were cotransfected with ATAD2 overexpression plasmid or ATAD2 siRNA respectively. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

Altering of ATAD2 expression levels reversed the effect of miR-372 on RCC cell EMT process. (A and B) Overexpression of ATAD2 in miR-372-overexpressed 786-O cells decreased the E-cadherin expression levels and increased the Vimentin expression levels. (C and D) Knockdown of ATAD2 in miR-372-suppressed Caki-1 cells upregulated E-cadherin and downregulated Vimentin significantly. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

Aberrant expression levels of miR-372 and ATAD2 were correlated with clinicopathological features and prognosis of RCC patients

As we had confirmed the functional effects of miR-372 and ATAD2 in RCC, subsequently, we further investigated the clinical significance of miR-372 and ATAD2 in RCC. The RCC patients involved in current study were divided into two groups based on the mean expression level of miR-372. Kaplan-Meier abalysis demonstrated that RCC patients with relatively low miR-372 expression levels had significantly decreased OS (Fig. 7A, P=0.0312) and DFS (Fig. 7B, P=0.0366). In addition, ATAD2 high-expressing RCC patients presented shorter OS and DFS compared to ATAD2 low-expressing cases (Fig. 7C and D). Correlation between miR-372 expression and clinical features analysis implied that miR-372 expression levels were relevant to lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and tumor differentiation (P=0.0015, 0.0075 and 0.0103, respectively, Table II).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Open in a new tab

Prognostic value of miR-372 and ATAD2 in RCC patients. (A) OS and (B) DFS of RCC patients with high and low miR-372 expression levels. (C) OS and (D) DFS of RCC patients with high and low ATAD2 expression levels.

Table II.

Correlation of miR-372 expression with the clinicopathological characteristics of the RCC patients.

miR-372a expression
Clinicopathological features Cases (n=52) High (n=21) Low (n=31) P-value χ2 value
Age (years) 0.2016 0.3718
  >60 27 11 16
  ≤60 25 10 15
Sex 0.3124 0.0132
  Male 26   9 17
  Female 26 12 14
Tumor size (cm) 0.0614 2.1431
  ≥5.0 24   6 18
  <5.0 28 15 13
TNM stage 0.0075b 7.3920
  I–II 26 17   9
  III 26   4 22
Histological type 0.0765 1.0125
  Clear cell 28 12 16
  Papillary 24   9 15
Tumor differentiation 0.0103b 3.7846
  Well and Moderate 25 16   9
  Poor 27   5 22
Lymph node metastasis 0.0015b 9.5623
  Present 26   4 22
  Absent 26 17   9
Open in a new tab

TNM, tumor-node-metastasis

a

The mean expression level of miR-372 was used as the cut off

b

Statistically significant.

Discussion

RCC is the most common neoplasm of the adult kidney, and the morbidity and mortality rates are increasing at a rate of 2–3% per decade (27). However, the curative effects of radiotherapy and traditional chemotherapy in advanced RCC therapy are limited (28). Additionally, although surgery is often curative for localized disease, majority of these patients experience metastasis or relapses, which is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, it is of crucial significance to understand the mechanisms underlying RCC metastasis and recurrence to explore novel anti-RCC therapeutic targets. Previous studies revealed that miRNAs may provide new directions for earlier diagnosis as well as better prognosis of RCC (29).

Recent studies have proposed the antitumor effects of miR-372 in various malignancies. Aberrant miR-372 expression has been identified as novel prognostic as well as diagnostic marker for osteosarcoma (30) and colorectal cancer (31). Additionally, studies by Wu et al indicated that declined miR-372 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma was relevant to tumor metastasis and poor prognosis (32); Kong et al reported that miR-372 repressed prostate cancer cell invasion and migration via regulating p65 (33); Liu et al found that miR-372 inhibited the progression of endometrial carcinoma via the regulation of RhoC (34). Consistent with these findings, we found that miR-372 was obviously downregulated in RCC and its decreased expression levels were related to poor prognosis and worse clinicopathological parameters of RCC patients. Furthermore, miR-372 overexpression suppressed RCC cell EMT and metastasis. The data suggested that miR-372 played an inhibitory role in RCC metastasis and progression.

Previous studies have identified and validated an array of possible direct targets of miR-372, such as TXNIP, ULK1 and CDK2 (35–37), suggesting that miR-372 is an antitumor miRNA which plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of cancer. To extend that observation, we assessed the relationship between miR-372 and ATAD2 in RCC. ATAD2 has been identified as a novel candidate oncogene and possibly a therapeutic target for several types of human cancers (38). For instance, Hwang et al found that ATAD2 functioned as a poor prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (39); Wan et al reported that ATAD2 overexpression in ovarian carcinoma indicated poor prognosis (40); Shang et al reported that overexpression of ATAD2/ANCCA in endometrial carcinoma was related to poor prognosis and tumor progression (41). These studies suggested that ATAD2 might have a potential as a therapeutic target for malignancies. Although the correlation between clinicopathological features and ATAD2 expression levels has been studied in multiple tumors, little is known about ATAD2 in RCC. Herein, the ectopic upregulation of ATAD2 in RCC was presented, which demonstrated a poor prognosis of RCC patients. Moreover, ATAD2 was identified as a direct target of miR-372 in RCC cells. Importantly, the inhibitory functions of miR-372 in RCC cell metastasis and EMT were confirmed to be regulated by ATAD2.

In conclusion, the findings in current research demonstrated a significant decrease of miR-372 expression levels and a notable increase of ATAD2 expression levels in RCC. Additionally, miR-372 overexpression had similar effects on repressing RCC cell invasion, migration and EMT as ATAD2 silence. Moreover, ATAD2 was confirmed to be a direct target of miR-372 and the antitumor effects of miR-372 on RCC progression were partially mediated by ATAD2. The findings suggested that miR-372/ATAD2 axis may be attractive biomarkers and therapeutic targets for RCC patients.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The study was supported by the Key Youth Project for Training Excellent Talents of Beijing (3101-03-36-10) and The Fundamental clinical cooperation project of Capital Medical University (17JL37).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

SJ and XS contributed to the conception of the study; HZ contributed significantly to data analysis and manuscript preparation; ZH and YZ performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; QL performed the statistical analysis with constructive discussions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University (Beijing, China). Signed informed consents were obtained from the patients or the guardians.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ridge CA, Pua BB, Madoff DC. Epidemiology and staging of renal cell carcinoma. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014;31:3–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gupta K, Miller JD, Li JZ, Russell MW, Charbonneau C. Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A literature review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34:193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jansi Prema KS, Devanathan KS, Kurien AA. Renal cell carcinoma with t(6,11): A case report and review of literature. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2017;60:574–576. doi: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_751_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gill DM, Hahn AW, Hale P, Maughan BL. Overview of current and future first-line systemic therapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018;19:6. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0517-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Margulis V, Master VA, Cost NG, Leibovich BC, Joniau S, Kuczyk M, Mulders PF, Kirkali Z, Wirth MP, Hirao Y, et al. International consultation on urologic diseases and the European Association of Urology international consultation on locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;60:673–683. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lin S, Gregory RI. MicroRNA biogenesis pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:321–333. doi: 10.1038/nrc3932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cirilo PDR, de Sousa Andrade LN, Corrêa BRS, Qiao M, Furuya TK, Chammas R, Penalva LOF. MicroRNA-195 acts as an anti-proliferative miRNA in human melanoma cells by targeting Prohibitin 1. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:750. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3721-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gang L, Qun L, Liu WD, Li YS, Xu YZ, Yuan DT. MicroRNA-34a promotes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and suppresses cell adhesion by targeting DUSP1 in osteosarcoma. Am J Transl Res. 2017;9:5388–5399. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu Y, Du J, Zhang P, Zhao X, Li Q, Jiang A, Jiang D, Tang G, Jiang Y, Wang J, et al. MicroRNA-125a-5p mediates 3T3-L1 preadipocyte proliferation and differentiation. Molecules. 2018;23:E317. doi: 10.3390/molecules23020317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Song H, Rao Y, Zhang G, Kong X. MicroRNA-384 inhibits the growth and invasion of renal cell carcinoma cells by targeting astrocyte elevated gene 1. Oncol Res. 2017 Aug 25; doi: 10.3727/096504017X15035025554553. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang X, Li H, Cui L, Feng J, Fan Q. MicroRNA-182 suppresses clear cell renal cell carcinoma migration and invasion by targeting IGF1R. Neoplasma. 2016;63:717–725. doi: 10.4149/neo_2016_508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hu B, Wang J, Jin X. MicroRNA-138 suppresses cell proliferation and invasion of renal cell carcinoma by directly targeting SOX9. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:7583–7588. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chilosi M, Caliò A, Rossi A, Gilioli E, Pedica F, Montagna L, Pedron S, Confalonieri M, Doglioni C, Ziesche R, et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition-related proteins ZEB1, β-catenin, and β-tubulin-III in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:26–38. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cruz-Solbes AS, Youker K. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT): Role and implications in kidney fibrosis. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2017;60:345–372. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51436-9_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fedele M, Cerchia L, Chiappetta G. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer: Focus on basal-like carcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2017;9:E134. doi: 10.3390/cancers9100134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saito N, Mine N, Kufe DW, Von Hoff DD, Kawabe T. CBP501 inhibits EGF-dependent cell migration, invasion and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of non-small cell lung cancer cells by blocking KRas to calmodulin binding. Oncotarget. 2017;8:74006–74018. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zou JX, Revenko AS, Li LB, Gemo AT, Chen HW. ANCCA, an estrogen-regulated AAA+ ATPase coactivator for ERalpha, is required for coregulator occupancy and chromatin modification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:18067–18072. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705814104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Beroukhim R, Mermel CH, Porter D, Wei G, Raychaudhuri S, Donovan J, Barretina J, Boehm JS, Dobson J, Urashima M, et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature. 2010;463:899–905. doi: 10.1038/nature08822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Raeder MB, Birkeland E, Trovik J, Krakstad C, Shehata S, Schumacher S, Zack TI, Krohn A, Werner HM, Moody SE, et al. Integrated genomic analysis of the 8q24 amplification in endometrial cancers identifies ATAD2 as essential to MYC-dependent cancers. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zheng L, Li T, Zhang Y, Guo Y, Yao J, Dou L, Guo K. Oncogene ATAD2 promotes cell proliferation, invasion and migration in cervical cancer. Oncol Rep. 2015;33:2337–2344. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.3867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cattaneo M, Morozumi Y, Perazza D, Boussouar F, Jamshidikia M, Rousseaux S, Verdel A, Khochbin S. Lessons from yeast on emerging roles of the ATAD2 protein family in gene regulation and genome organization. Mol Cells. 2014;37:851–856. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.0258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hou M, Huang R, Song Y, Feng D, Jiang Y, Liu M. ATAD2 overexpression is associated with progression and prognosis in colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:222–227. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang M, Zhang C, Du W, Yang X, Chen Z. ATAD2 is overexpressed in gastric cancer and serves as an independent poor prognostic biomarker. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18:776–781. doi: 10.1007/s12094-015-1430-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hakimi AA, Furberg H, Zabor EC, Jacobsen A, Schultz N, Ciriello G, Mikklineni N, Fiegoli B, Kim PH, Voss MH, et al. An epidemiologic and genomic investigation into the obesity paradox in renal cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1862–1870. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Massari F, Di Nunno V, Ciccarese C, Graham J, Porta C, Comito F, Cubelli M, Iacovelli R, Heng DYC. Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;60:152–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhu J, Ma X, Zhang Y, Ni D, Ai Q, Li H, Zhang X. Establishment of a miRNA-mRNA regulatory network in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and screening of potential therapeutic targets. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:15649–15663. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu SY, Xu PF, Gao TT. MiR-372-3p inhibits the growth and metastasis of osteosarcoma cells by targeting FXYD6. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22:62–69. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201801_14101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yu J, Jin L, Jiang L, Gao L, Zhou J, Hu Y, Li W, Zhi Q, Zhu X. Serum miR-372 is a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in patients with early colorectal cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2016;16:424–431. doi: 10.2174/1871520615666150716110406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu G, Wang Y, Lu X, He H, Liu H, Meng X, Xia S, Zheng K, Liu B. Low miR-372 expression correlates with poor prognosis and tumor metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:182. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1214-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kong X, Qian X, Duan L, Liu H, Zhu Y, Qi J. MicroRNA-372 suppresses migration and invasion by targeting p65 in human prostate cancer cells. DNA Cell Biol. 2016;35:828–835. doi: 10.1089/dna.2015.3186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu BL, Sun KX, Zong ZH, Chen S, Zhao Y. MicroRNA-372 inhibits endometrial carcinoma development by targeting the expression of the Ras homolog gene family member C (RhoC) Oncotarget. 2016;7:6649–6664. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ragusa M, Statello L, Maugeri M, Majorana A, Barbagallo D, Salito L, Sammito M, Santonocito M, Angelica R, Cavallaro A, et al. Specific alterations of the microRNA transcriptome and global network structure in colorectal cancer after treatment with MAPK/ERK inhibitors. J Mol Med (Berl) 2012;90:1421–1438. doi: 10.1007/s00109-012-0918-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen H, Zhang Z, Lu Y, Song K, Liu X, Xia F, Sun W. Downregulation of ULK1 by microRNA-372 inhibits the survival of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:1811–1819. doi: 10.1111/cas.13315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tian RQ, Wang XH, Hou LJ, Jia WH, Yang Q, Li YX, Liu M, Li X, Tang H. MicroRNA-372 is down-regulated and targets cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) and cyclin A1 in human cervical cancer, which may contribute to tumorigenesis. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:25556–25563. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.221564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ciró M, Prosperini E, Quarto M, Grazini U, Walfridsson J, McBlane F, Nucifero P, Pacchiana G, Capra M, Christensen J, et al. ATAD2 is a novel cofactor for MYC, overexpressed and amplified in aggressive tumors. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8491–8498. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hwang HW, Ha SY, Bang H, Park CK. ATAD2 as a poor prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47:853–861. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wan WN, Zhang YX, Wang XM, Liu YJ, Zhang YQ, Que YH, Zhao WJ. ATAD2 is highly expressed in ovarian carcinomas and indicates poor prognosis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:2777–2783. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.6.2777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shang P, Meng F, Liu Y, Chen X. Overexpression of ANCCA/ATAD2 in endometrial carcinoma and its correlation with tumor progression and poor prognosis. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:4479–4485. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3089-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES