Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Microbiol Spectr. 2019 Jan;7(1):10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0001-2018. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0001-2018

Outer Membrane Vesicle—Host Cell Interactions

Jessica D Cecil 1,#, Natalie Sirisaengtaksin 2,#, Neil M O’Brien-Simpson 1,*, Anne Marie Krachler 2,*
PMCID: PMC6352913  NIHMSID: NIHMS999065  PMID: 30681067

Abstract

Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are nanosized proteoliposomes derived from the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. They are ubiquitously produced both in culture and during infection, and are now recognized to play crucial roles during host-microbe interactions. OMVs can transport a broad range of chemically diverse cargoes, including lipids and lipopolysaccharides, membrane embedded and associated proteins and small molecules, peptidoglycan and nucleic acids. Particularly virulence factors such as adhesins and toxins are often enriched in OMVs. Here, we discuss a variety of ways in which OMVs facilitate host-microbe interactions, including their contributions to biofilm formation, nutrient scavenging, and modulation of host cell function. We particularly examine recent findings regarding outer membrane vesicle – host cell interactions in the oral cavity and the gastrointestinal tract.

Introduction to outer membrane vesicles

Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are nanosized, spherical proteoliposomes. They are secreted via vesiculation of the outer membrane by Gram-negative bacteria as part of the normal growth process (1). OMVs play diverse roles in intracellular communication, microbial virulence, and in modulating the host immune response (2).

The surface of OMVs is composed of a phospholipid bilayer with an outer layer of lipopolysaccharide, outer membrane proteins, and receptors. Internally, OMVs possess a thin layer of peptidoglycan and contain periplasmic proteins as well as nucleic acids (2-6), (Figure 1). Specific components may selectively be enriched or depleted from OMVs, suggesting that vesiculation is a deliberate and regulated process (6, 7). Many theories exist on the mechanism of vesiculation, including the accumulation of envelope components, increased membrane curvature, or reduction in lipoprotein to peptidoglycan crosslinks (2, 8-11). In all cases, vesiculation requires the outer membrane to separate from the underlying peptidoglycan layer and outwards budding until a vesicle can detach from the bacterial surface. The exception is the recently described mechanism of vesicle formation by “explosive” cell lysis, which is initiated by a prophage endolysin (12).

Figure 1: Structure and composition of bacterial outer membrane vesicles.

Figure 1:

Examples of purified outer membrane vesicles isolated from (A) Porphyromonas gingivalis, (B) Treponema denticola and (C) Tannerella forsythia. Outer membrane vesicles were purified using an optiprep gradient and visualized using Cryo-TEM as previously described (73). Scale bars, 200 nm. (D) Typical composition of bacterial outer membrane vesicles.

Variations in temperature, growth medium, growth phase, and many other factors can quantitatively and qualitatively influence vesiculation and OMV composition. For example, OMVs secreted by biofilms, as opposed to planktonic bacteria, are smaller, more gelatinous, and produced in larger quantities (13). Vesiculation in Helicobacter pylori biofilms is enhanced by the addition of serum to the growth medium (14). OMVs produced during stationary growth have different physiochemical properties than those produced during exponential phase, including differences in protein and lipid composition, a higher buoyant density, and higher negative charge (15, 16). Vesiculation also increases in response to nutrient restriction, exposure to chemical stressors, and during infection (10, 17-20). This implies that vesiculation is an envelope stress response promoting bacterial survival (21-23). Mutations leading to increased vesiculation enhance the pathogenic potential of bacteria, despite the associated increase in metabolic burden (24). Stress-inducing conditions are often used to stimulate vesiculation, although the composition of such preparations is altered by the stress (25). Alterations in amounts of lipoprotein, LPS, and other pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) contained in such OMVs likely trigger different immunological responses, and this should be considered when using them to study host-microbe interactions.

The sensitivity of OMVs to altered growth conditions as well as the inherent variability between OMVs of different species and strains demands precise and standardised methods of growth, and OMV isolation. Additionally, biochemical and immunological characterization of OMVs is greatly complicated by their nanosize, which precludes many established methods of quantification and analysis. These obstacles complicate OMV research and make comparisons and conclusions regarding OMV-host cell interactions difficult. We and others have reported methods to separate immunogenic cell debris from OMVs, and combined this with enumeration of the OMVs via flow cytometry and nanoparticle tracking techniques to allow quantitative comparison of OMV-host cell interactions (26-28).

Techniques used to characterize and visualize OMV-host cell interactions were recently reviewed elsewhere (29). Here, we discuss the role of OMVs in microbe-host interactions, with particular emphasis on two areas that have seen major recent advances: OMVs in microbe host-interactions in the oral cavity, and in the gastrointestinal tract.

OMV-host cell interactions in the oral cavity

Chronic periodontitis is an inflammatory, polymicrobial disease promoting the progressive destruction of bone and ligament tissue supporting the teeth (30). Destruction of these support structures lead to tooth mobility and loss (30, 31). Chronic periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, adverse pregnancy outcomes, respiratory infections, and rheumatoid arthritis (32, 33).

The subgingival plaque is home to multispecies biofilms and its development is strongly associated with the onset of chronic periodontitis. These biofilms are protected within the periodontal pocket, the space around a tooth left behind by degraded bone and tissue. Although more than 700 bacterial species make up this structured biofilm (34), only a handful of them are associated with disease progression (35). Increased concentrations of the Gram-negative, anaerobic, proteolytic bacteria Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia are strongly associated with symptoms of chronic periodontitis (36-38), and all three species secrete OMVs (Figure 1).

Role of OMVs in plaque formation

P. gingivalis is the most widely studied bacterial species in the periodontal disease field and a major contributor to chronic periodontitis. Implantation of P. gingivalis was sufficient to induce periodontitis in non-human primates, supporting its role as a keystone pathogen in the disease (39). Its success as an oral pathogen is largely attributed to its arsenal of pathogenicity factors, many of which are secreted from the cell in OMVs (40, 41). The most prominent of these are gingipains, secreted cysteine proteases (42). P. gingivalis OMVs are enriched in gingipains, compared to the bacterial surface (41, 43). Gingipains promote P. gingivalis cell spread throughout periodontal tissue, by promoting the destruction of supportive bone and tissue within the oral cavity, and host cell invasion (44-46).

P. gingivalis-derived OMVs exhibit a functional flexibility that allows for the elimination of competitors and promotion of bacteria advantageous to P. gingivalis (47). They are also capable of inhibiting and dispersing competing biofilms, such as those composed of Streptococcus gordonii, in a gingipain-dependent manner (47). P. gingivalis OMVs have a strong tendency to form aggregates, both between themselves and other microbes, which facilitates the co-aggregation of non-aggregating species, such as T. denticola, Eubacterium saburreum and Capnocytophaga ochracea (4, 9). T. forsythia also benefits from the secretion of gingipain-containing OMVs, which enhance the attachment of whole cell T. forsythia to epithelial cells (48). These studies suggest that P. gingivalis OMVs influence the bacterial composition of the periodontal plaque. T. forsythia secrete OMVs that may also encourage and strengthen subgingival biofilms. They contain both the sialidase SiaHI and the β-N-acetylglucosaminidase HexA, which are thought to be involved in biofilm formation (7, 49, 50).

OMV interactions with gingival tissues

Nanoparticles of 10-100 nm diameter penetrate the extracellular matrix protecting host cells (51). Therefore, it has been proposed that periodontal OMVs act as a novel secretion system that delivers virulence factors deep into host tissues, eliminating the need for direct bacterial contact (52). The OMVs’ ability to adhere to and fuse with host cells provides a mechanism of cellular entry for pathogenicity factors (53, 54).

P. gingivalis secretes OMVs that are internalized by both gingival epithelial and endothelial cells (55-57), (Figure 2). Multiple internalization pathways for these OMVs have been proposed. These include caveolin-dependent endocytosis and a fimbriae-dependent pathway which relies on lipid raft mediated endocytosis (58). The exact manner of endocytis depends upon vesicle size (58). Once internalized, P. gingivalis OMVs survive briefly within endocytic organelles before being sorted into lysosomal compartments and being degraded (55, 59). Despite the fast turnover of P. gingivalis OMVs within host cells, their entry still causes functional impairment of epithelial cells by degrading signaling molecules required for cellular migration (60). P. gingivalis OMVs also disrupt oral squamous epithelial cell monolayers, by inducing gingipain-dependent cell detachment (61), (Figure 2). Likewise, T. denticola secretes dentilisin-containing OMVs that disrupt tight junctions in epithelial monolayers. The protease activity of dentilisin results in the degradation of intercellular adhesion proteins, which facilitates bacterial penetration of underlying tissues (52, 62).

Figure 2: A summary of outer membrane vesicle interactions within gingival tissues.

Figure 2:

Bacteria accrete on the tooth’s surface and form a bacterial (plaque) biofilm that is adjacent to the epithelial cells in the gingival (gum) tissue. Outer membranes vesicles secreted from bacteria in this plaque biofilm bind to and penetrate into the mucosal tissue and generate host cell interactions and responses. These response culminate into a chronic inflammatory response resulting osteoclast activation which in turn promotes bone resorption and eventual tooth loss.

A contributing factor to advanced periodontal tissue destruction is host cell death, reported to affect both epithelial cells (63) and fibroblasts (64) in gingival biopsies of periodontitis patients. T. denticola outer membranes and purified outer membrane proteins Msp and chymotrypsin-like proteinase are highly cytotoxic to periodontal ligament epithelial cells due to their pore-forming activity (65), (Figure 2). Lipooligosaccharide on T. denticola OMVs is highly toxic to gingival epithelial cells (66). Additionally, P. gingivalis OMVs hinder the proliferation of fibroblasts and endothelial cells and suppress angiogenesis in vitro, contributing to inhibited wound repair in periodontal tissues (67). Interestingly, low concentrations of T. forsythia OMVs promote cell survival in human gingival fibroblasts over short time periods (7). P. gingivalis OMVs protect endothelial cells by reducing eNOS expression, an indicator of oxidative damage and metabolic dysfunction (68). In some cases, cell death is preceded by autophagy, a highly regulated process leading to degradation of damaged organelles and cytosolic products (69, 70). Autophagy is an important mechanism during periodontal inflammation (71), and is stimulated by peptidoglycan contained within bacterial OMVs (72).

Manipulation of the host immune response by OMVs

OMVs from P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia interact intimately with mucosal epithelial cells, connective tissue fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and innate immune cells to facilitate and dysregulate inflammation within gingival tissue (26). These OMVs activate pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) in gingival epithelial cells, resulting in cell activation, cytokine secretion, or apoptotic cell death (Figure 2). OMVs interact with macrophages through PRRs to induce the secretion of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines that dysregulate chronic inflammation (73). The effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines in periodontitis include the activation of neutrophils, T and B lymphocytes, macrophages, natural killer cells, and osteoclasts. This promotes connective tissue destruction and alveolar bone resorption, all clinical hallmarks of chronic periodontitis (74-76), (Figure 2).

Human periodontal ligament fibroblasts express significantly higher levels of IL-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) when exposed to T. forsythia OMVs than in response to T. forsythia bacteria (7). IL-8 and MCP-1 are chemoattractants that induce the migration of neutrophils and monocytes, respectively, to the site of inflammation (75, 77), (Figure 2). Once recruited to tissues, monocytes are stimulated by P. gingivalis OMVs to induce foam cell formation (78), release inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and nitric oxide (NO), (79) and secrete significant amounts of cytokines (Figure 2).

P. gingivalis OMVs induce IL-8 secretion from human gingival fibroblasts (80) and LOS on T. denticola OMVs induces strong pro-inflammatory responses from gingival fibroblasts, including secretion of IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, prostaglandin E, matrix metalloproteinase-3, and NO (66). The continuous secretion of cytokines from host tissues promotes periodontal tissue destruction, and leads to the recruitment of innate and adaptive immune cells to the site of infection.

P. gingivalis OMVs also inhibit the surface expression of Human Leukocyte Antigen – antigen D related (HLA-DR) molecules on human umbilical cord vascular endothelial cells, limiting Major histocompatibility complex class II-induced active immunity (56). Gingipains contained within the OMVs compromise the protective action of human serum through the degradation of IgG, IgM, and complement factor C3 (81, 82). Further, P. gingivalis OMVs mediate LPS tolerance in monocyte/macrophage cell lines, limiting pro-inflammatory responses. Prior exposure to P. gingivalis OMVs greatly inhibits TNFα and IL-1β secretion in response to either E. coli LPS or whole-cell, live P. gingivalis (77, 83). Likewise, T. denticola lipooligosaccharide and the outer membrane protein Msp can induce macrophage tolerance to further stimulation with intact bacteria (84), (Figure 2).

Tolerance to LPS assists the host by minimizing inflammatory damage induced by high OMV/bacterial concentrations and prolonged or repeated exposure; however, it also benefits bacterial survival by inhibiting bacterial clearance. P. gingivalis OMVs also manipulate adaptive immunity and elicit humoral immune responses. Intranasal immunization with P. gingivalis OMVs induces P. gingivalis-specific IgG and IgA antibodies in blood as well as mucosal IgA in saliva (3, 85, 86). The structural and functional stability of P. gingivalis OMVs, combined with their ability to induce mucosal immunity make them a promising candidate for future immunization studies (87).

OMV-host cell interactions in the gastrointestinal tract

The human intestinal mucosa is one of the largest interfaces mediating host-microbe interactions. The human gut alone plays host to more than 500 species of bacteria, which fall largely into four major phyla: Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria (88, 89). These microbial populations play diverse and critical roles in intestinal homeostasis and overall human health. Certain types of bacteria may benefit the host, as they produce metabolites that allow energy recovery and aid in nutrient absorption (90). Commensal bacteria may also positively promote differentiation and proliferation of the intestinal epithelial cell layer (91). However, disruption in the composition of the gut microflora may contribute to many different pathologies, including inflammatory bowel diseases, obesity, cancer, diabetes, and neurological disorders, among others (92-96). Although the intestinal epithelium communicates with the gut microbiota, the two entities are physically separated by a mucosal barrier (97). As in other environments, gut bacteria generate OMVs, which they use as a means of bacteria-host communication at the mucosal interface (Figure 3). The intestinal milieu and mucus layer have been reported to stimulate vesiculation (20).

Figure 3. A summary of outer membrane vesicle interactions with the gastrointestinal tract.

Figure 3.

Environmental pressures, such as low pH, mucin or peptides or overgrowth of certain bacteria result in the release of outer membrane vesicles in the gastric lumen. These OMVs are able to penetrate the mucosal barrier and via different mechanisms adhere and interact with the underlying epithelial cell and immune cells inducing homeostasis or pathology.

Role of OMVs in intercellular trafficking

Many toxins once classically viewed as secreted proteins, have recently been shown to be associated with and trafficked by OMVs. These include, most prominently, Shiga toxins of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) (98, 99). EHEC is a foodborne pathogen causing hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome, a life-threatening complication of EHEC infection that may result in kidney failure (100). OMV-associated Shiga toxin is sufficient to cause hemolytic uremic syndrome in a mouse model (101). EHEC vesicles traffic accessory toxins, including hemolysin and cytolethal distending toxin V, into host cells (102, 103). Exposure to the gastrointestinal milieu, including conditions of low pH and the presence of mucin and antimicrobial peptides, stimulates the release of OMVs from EHEC and other enteric pathogens (20, 104). A majority of cholera toxin (CTx) produced by V. cholerae is also secreted in OMV-associated form, rather than as soluble protein as previously thought (105). Since CTx is contained within the vesicle lumen, it is taken up in a manner independent of host glycoproteins such as Lewis X glycan, which acts as a receptor for soluble CTx (106, 107). The finding that many toxins are vesicle-associated significantly impacts our understanding of their entry kinetics, intracellular trafficking and intoxication of host cells (103). Vesicle-associated lipopolysaccharide modulates OMV entry kinetics (28), and OMV-associated LPS is the main trigger for cytosolic caspase-11 which contributes to innate immune responses during EHEC infection (108).

Subversion of gastrointestinal immunity by OMVs

Helicobacter pylori is a pathogen that colonizes the upper gastrointestinal tract of around half the human population, although carriage remains asymptomatic in 80% of patients. However, persistent infection induces chronic inflammation of the gastric mucosa, which can lead to gastric ulceration and cancer (109). H. pylori releases cytotoxic proteins, including the vacuolating cytotoxin VacA, as OMV cargo (110, 111). These OMVs contribute to the carcinogenic potential of H. pylori infections (112), although the exact mechanisms remain elusive. OMVs are small enough to penetrate the mucosal barrier and deliver immunomodulatory molecules to the gastric epithelium (Figure 3). This interaction between host cells and bacterial proteins dysregulates both pro- and anti-inflammatory processes, contributing to overall pathogenesis. For example, H. pylori-derived OMVs induce T cell apoptosis, partially due to carriage of VacA (113). At lower concentrations, they inhibit T cell activation in a cyclo-ogygenase-2 dependent manner, by increasing the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (114). H. pylori OMVs also subvert the activation of dendritic cells, by modulating both the Akt-Nrf2 and mTOR-IKK-NF-κB signaling axes (Figure 3). This induces the expression of heme oxygenase-1, which regulates dendritic cell maturation and function (115).

OMVs from commensals play a potent role in mediating anti-inflammatory responses and microbial immune tolerance (Figure 3). Peptidoglycan from commensal E. coli is delivered to cytosolic nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain – containing protein 1 (NOD1) through OMVs, and this process is involved in intestinal homeostasis (116). In the absence of these mechanisms, the host is more susceptible to inflammatory disease, such as colitis (117). On the other hand, overgrowth of certain members of the microbiota, for example Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, can lead to colitis, due to their production of sulfatase which permits access of OMVs to immune cells and pro-inflammatory responses (118).

OMVs as a platform for vaccine development

Acute diarrheal diseases remain a major cause of mortality worldwide, and particularly affect infants and the elderly. Despite intense efforts, vaccines that both efficiently target enteric pathogens and are effective in populations in endemic regions have remained elusive. However, the finding that OMVs play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of enteric infections has brought about a renewed interest and directed a new wave of research in this area. OMVs have been tested as antigens for vaccines that target pathogenic E. coli (119), Salmonella (120), Vibrio cholerae (121, 122), and combinations of pathogens (123). OMVs carry a complex mixture of biologically active molecules, including lipopolysaccharide, proteins, and phospholipids. This means they stimulate more protective immune responses than purified proteins, and elicit more robust protection than recombinant protein vaccines (124, 125). They may also offer prolonged protection compared to protein-based vaccines (126).

OMVs derived from Salmonella enteritidis provided intranasally or intraperitoneally elicited both robust humoral and mucosal immune responses, and were protective against S. enteritidis infection (127). Engineered strains overexpressing the small RNA MicA displayed hypervesiculation, with OMVs enriched in outer membrane porins. These provoked robust Th1- and Th17-type immune responses, and were protective against lethal challenge with Salmonella (128). In another study, a modified strain expressing penta-acetylated lipid A was used, which produced OMVs that retained their immunogenicity against enterotoxigenic E. coli, but with reduced reactogenicity (124).

Outlook and future research

Many advancements have been made in the field of OMV research over the past few years, and we have significantly furthered our understanding of OMV-host cell interactions, including in previously understudied niches such as the oral cavity. An emerging field is the investigation of OMVs secreted by the microbiota, and the contributions of these to gut homeostasis. Recent studies indicate an extensive metabolic link between the intestinal microbiota and host, and OMVs serve as a shuttle of small molecules between bacteria and host (129). Another exciting area is the investigation of immune responses triggered by OMVs. A detailed understanding of these interactions will allow us to tailor OMV-based vaccines, and improve our ability to target pathogens which have so far evaded vaccination efforts. These developments ensure the investigation of OMV-host interactions will stay a busy and rewarding field in years to come.

Acknowledgements

We would like to apologize to all researchers in this exciting field whose studies we had to omit due to space limitations. We would like to encourage the reader to further explore the literature to discover the abundance of fantastic research in this area. We would like to thank the O’Brien-Simpson and Krachler labs for helpful comments and critical reading of drafts of this manuscripts. Our research in funded by a UTSystems STAR award and the NIH (grant R01 AI132354), and by the Australian Government, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, the Australian Dental Research Foundation (ADRF), and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant APP1101935.

References

  • 1.Beveridge TJ. 1999. Structures of gram-negative cell walls and their derived membrane vesicles. Journal of Bacteriology 181:4725–4733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kuehn M, Kesty N. 2005. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and the host–pathogen interaction. Genes & Development 19:2645–2655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nakao Ryoma, Hasegawa Hideki, Ochiai Kuniyasu, Takashiba Shogo, Ainai Akira, Ohnishi Makoto, Watanabe Haruo, Senpuku H. 2011. Outer membrane vesicles of Porphyromonas gingivalis elicit a mucosal immune response. PLOS ONE 6:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grenier D, Mayrand D. 1987. Functional characterization of extracellular vesicles produced by Bacteroides gingivalis. Infection And Immunity 55:111–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haurat MF, Aduse-Opoku J, Rangarajan M, Dorobantu L, Gray MR, Curtis MA, Feldman MF. 2011. Selective sorting of cargo proteins into bacterial membrane vesicles. The Journal Of Biological Chemistry 286:1269–1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Veith PD, Chen Y-Y, Gorasia DG, Chen D, Glew MD, O'Brien-Simpson NM, Cecil JD, Holden JA, Reynolds EC. 2014. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles exclusively contain outer membrane and periplasmic proteins and carry a cargo enriched with virulence factors. Journal Of Proteome Research 13 2420–2432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Friedrich V, Gruber C, Nimeth I, Pabinger S, Sekot G, Posch G, Altmann F, Messner P, Andrukhov O, Schäffer C. 2015. Outer membrane vesicles of Tannerella forsythia: Biogenesis, composition, and virulence. Molecular Oral Microbiology 30:451–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhou L, Srisatjaluk R, Justus DE, Doyle RJ. 1998. On the origin of membrane vesicles in gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters 163:223–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grenier D. 2013. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles mediate coaggregation and piggybacking of Treponema denticola and Lachnoanaerobaculum saburreum. International Journal Of Dentistry 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McBroom AJ, Kuehn MJ. 2007. Release of outer membrane vesicles by Gram-negative bacteria is a novel envelope stress response. Molecular Microbiology 63:545–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roier S, Zingl FG, Cakar F, Durakovic S, Kohl P, Eichmann TO, Klug L, Gadermaier B, Weinzerl K, Prassl R, Lass A, Daum G, Reidl J, Feldman MF, Schild S. 2016. A novel mechanism for the biogenesis of outer membrane vesicles in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Commun 7:10515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turnbull L, Toyofuku M, Hynen AL, Kurosawa M, Pessi G, Petty NK, Osvath SR, Carcamo-Oyarce G, Gloag ES, Shimoni R, Omasits U, Ito S, Yap X, Monahan LG, Cavaliere R, Ahrens CH, Charles IG, Nomura N, Eberl L, Whitchurch CB. 2016. Explosive cell lysis as a mechanism for the biogenesis of bacterial membrane vesicles and biofilms. Nat Commun 7:11220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schooling SR, Beveridge TJ. 2006. Membrane vesicles: an overlooked component of the matrices of biofilms. Journal of Bacteriology 188:5945–5957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yonezawa H, Osaki T, Kurata S, Fukuda M, Kawakami H, Ochiai K, Hanawa T, Kamiya S. 2009. Outer membrane vesicles of Helicobacter pylori TK1402 are involved in biofilm formation. BMC Microbiology 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tashiro Y, Ichikawa S, Shimizu M, Toyofuku M, Takaya N, Nakajima-Kambe T, Uchiyama H, Nomura N. 2010. Variation of physiochemical properties and cell association activity of membrane vesicles with growth phase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76:3732–3739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McCaig WD, Koller A, Thanassi DG. 2013. Production of outer membrane vesicles and outer membrane tubes by Francisella novicida. Journal Of Bacteriology 195:1120–1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ellis TN, Kuehn MJ. 2010. Virulence and immunomodulatory roles of bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 74:81–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McKee AS, McDermid AS, Baskerville A, Dowsett AB, Ellwood DC, Marsh PD. 1986. Effect of hemin on the physiology and virulence of Bacteroides gingivalis W50,. Infection and Immunity 52:349–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smalley JW, Birss AJ, McKee AS, Marsh PD. 1991. Haemin-restriction influences haemin-binding, haemagglutination and protease activity of cells and extracellular membrane vesicles of Porphyromonas gingivalis W50. FEMS Microbiology Letters 69:63–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bauwens A, Kunsmann L, Marejkova M, Zhang W, Karch H, Bielaszewska M, Mellmann A. 2017. Intrahost milieu modulates production of outer membrane vesicles, vesicle-associated Shiga toxin 2a and cytotoxicity in Escherichia coli O157:H7 and O104:H4. Environ Microbiol Rep 9:626–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Macdonald IA, Kuehn MJ. 2013. Stress-induced outer membrane vesicle production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Bacteriology 195 2971–2981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heredia MR, Boeris SP, Liffourrena SA, Bergero F, López A, Lucchesi IG. 2016. Release of outer membrane vesicles in Pseudomonas putida as a response to stress caused by cationic surfactants. Microbiology 162:813–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kulp A, Kuehn MJ. 2010. Biological functions and biogenesis of secreted bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Annual Review of Microbiology 64:163–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tianyan S, Mika F, Lindmark B, Zhi L, Schild S, Bishop A, Jun J, Camilli A, Johansson J, Vogel J, Sun Nyunt W. 2008. A new Vibrio cholerae sRNA modulates colonization and affects release of outer membrane vesicle. Molecular Microbiology 70:100–111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Collins BS. 2011. Gram-negative outer membrane vesicles in vaccine development. Discovery Medicine 12:7–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cecil JD, O'Brien-Simpson NM, Lenzo JC, Holden JA, Chen YY, Singleton W, Gause KT, Yan Y, Caruso F, Reynolds EC. 2016. Differential Responses of Pattern Recognition Receptors to Outer Membrane Vesicles of Three Periodontal Pathogens. PLoS One 11:e0151967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wieser A, Storz E, Liegl G, Peter A, Pritsch M, Shock J, Wai SN, Schubert S. 2014. Efficient quantification and characterization of bacterial outer membrane derived nano-particles with flow cytometric analysis. Int J Med Microbiol 304:1032–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.O'Donoghue EJ, Sirisaengtaksin N, Browning DF, Bielska E, Hadis M, Fernandez-Trillo F, Alderwick L, Jabbari S, Krachler AM. 2017. Lipopolysaccharide structure impacts the entry kinetics of bacterial outer membrane vesicles into host cells. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.O'Donoghue EJ, Krachler AM. 2016. Mechanisms of outer membrane vesicle entry into host cells. Cell Microbiol 18:1508–1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oliver RC. 1993. Periodontal diseases and tooth loss. Periodontology 2000 2:117–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shaddox LM, Walker CB. 2010. Treating chronic periodontitis: current status, challenges, and future directions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2:79–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim J, Amar S. 2006. Periodontal disease and systemic conditions: a bidirectional relationship. Odontology 94:10–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Linden GJ, Lyons A, Scannapieco FA. 2013. Periodontal systemic associations: review of the evidence. Journal of Periodontology 84:8–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. 2005. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 43:5721–5732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Paster BJ, Olsen I, Aas JA, Dewhirst FE. 2006. The breadth of bacterial diversity in the human periodontal pocket and other oral sites. Periodontology 2000 42:80–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr. 1998. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 25:134–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Tanner A, Pollack RP, Smith C, Kent RL Jr., Socransky SS. 1998. Subgingival microbiota in healthy, well-maintained elder and periodontitis subjects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 25:346–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Byrne SJ, Dashper SG, Darby IB, Adams GG, Hoffmann B, Reynolds EC. 2009. Progression of chronic periodontitis can be predicted by the levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola in subgingival plaque. Oral Microbiology & Immunology 24:469–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Holt SC, Ebersole J, Felton J, Brunsvold M, Kornman KS. 1988. Implantation of Bacteroides gingivalis in nonhuman primates initiates progression of periodontitis. Science 239:55–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ho MH, Chen CH, Goodwin JS, Wang BY, Xie H. 2015. Functional Advantages of Porphyromonas gingivalis Vesicles. PLoS One 10:e0123448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Veith PD, Chen YY, Gorasia DG, Chen D, Glew MD, O'Brien-Simpson NM, Cecil JD, Holden JA, Reynolds EC. 2014. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles exclusively contain outer membrane and periplasmic proteins and carry a cargo enriched with virulence factors. J Proteome Res 13:2420–2432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sheets SM, Robles-Price AG, McKenzie RM, Casiano CA, Fletcher HM. 2008. Gingipain-dependent interactions with the host are important for survival of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Front Biosci 13:3215–3238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.O'Brien-Simpson NM, Veith PD, Dashper SG, Reynolds EC. 2003. Porphyromonas gingivalis gingipains: the molecular teeth of a microbial vampire. Curr Protein Pept Sci 4:409–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li N, Collyer CA. 2011. Gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis - Complex domain structures confer diverse functions. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 1:41–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pathirana RD, O'Brien-Simpson NM, Brammar GC, Slakeski N, Reynolds EC. 2007. Kgp and RgpB, but not RgpA, are important for Porphyromonas gingivalis virulence in the murine periodontitis model. Infect Immun 75:1436–1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pathirana RD, O'Brien-Simpson NM, Reynolds EC. 2010. Host immune responses to Porphyromonas gingivalis antigens. Periodontol 2000 52:218–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ho M-H, Chen C-H, Goodwin JS, Wang B-Y, Xie H. 2015. Functional advantages of Porphyromonas gingivalis vesicles. PLOS ONE 10:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Inagaki S, Onishi S, Kuramitsu HK, Sharma A. 2006. Porphyromonas gingivalis vesicles enhance attachment, and the leucine-rich repeat BspA protein is required for invasion of epithelial cells by Tannerella forsythia. Infection And Immunity 74:5023–5028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yoshimura M, Ohara N, Kondo Y, Shoji M, Okano S, Nakano Y, Abiko Y, Nakayama K. 2008. Proteome analysis of Porphyromonas gingivalis cells placed in a subcutaneous chamber of mice. Oral Microbiology And Immunology 23:413–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Veith PD, Chen YY, Chen D, O'Brien-Simpson NM, Cecil JD, Holden JA, Lenzo JC, Reynolds EC. 2015. Tannerella forsythia Outer Membrane Vesicles Are Enriched with Substrates of the Type IX Secretion System and TonB-Dependent Receptors. J Proteome Res 14:5355–5366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dane KY, Nembrini C, Tomei AA, Eby JK, O'Neil CP, Velluto D, Swartz MA, Inverardi L, Hubbell JA. 2011. Nano-sized drug-loaded micelles deliver payload to lymph node immune cells and prolong allograft survival. Journal of Controlled Release 156:154–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chi B, Qi M, Kuramitsu H. 2003. Role of dentilisin in Treponema denticola epithelial cell layer penetration. Research In Microbiology 154:637–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Galka F, Wai SN, Kusch H, Engelmann S, Hecker M, Schmeck B, Hippenstiel S, Uhlin BE, Steinert M. 2008. Proteomic characterization of the whole secretome of Legionella pneumophila and functional analysis of outer membrane vesicles. Infection And Immunity 76:1825–1836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bomberger JM, MacEachran DP, Coutermarsh BA, Ye S, O'Toole GA, Stanton BA. 2009. Long-distance delivery of bacterial virulence factors by Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane vesicles. PLOS Pathogens 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Furuta N, Tsuda K, Omori H, Yoshimori T, Yoshimura F, Amano A. 2009. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles enter human epithelial cells via an endocytic pathway and are sorted to lysosomal compartments. Infection And Immunity 77:4187–4196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Srisatjaluk R, Kotwal GJ, Hunt LA, Justus DE. 2002. Modulation of gamma interferon-induced major histocompatibility complex class II gene expression by Porphyromonas gingivalis membrane vesicles. Infection And Immunity 70:1185–1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tsuda K, Amano A, Umebayashi K, Inaba H, Nakagawa I, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimori T. 2005. Molecular dissection of internalization of Porphyromonas gingivalis by cells using fluorescent beads coated with bacterial membrane vesicle. Cell Structure and Function 30:81–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gui MJ, Dashper SG, Slakeski N, Chen YY, Reynolds EC. 2016. Spheres of influence: Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles. Molecular Oral Microbiology 31:365–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Amano A, Kuboniwa M, Takeuchi H. 2014. Transcellular invasive mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis in host-parasite interactions. Journal of Oral Biosciences 56:58–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Furuta N, Takeuchi H, Amano A. 2009. Entry of Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles into epithelial cells causes cellular functional impairment. Infection And Immunity 77:4761–4770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nakao R, Takashiba S, Kosono S, Yoshida M, Watanabe H, Ohnishi M, Senpuku H. 2014. Effect of Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles on gingipain-mediated detachment of cultured oral epithelial cells and immune responses. Microbes and Infection 16:6–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bo C, Mingshan Q, Howard KK. 2003. Role of dentilisin in Treponema denticola epithelial cell layer penetration. Research in Microbiology 154:637–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jarnbring F, Somogyi E, Dalton J, Gustafsson A, Klinge B. 2002. Quantitative assessment of apoptotic and proliferative gingival keratinocytes in oral and sulcular epithelium in patients with gingivitis and periodontitis. Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 29:1065–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Arce RM, Tamayo O, Cortés A. 2007. Apoptosis of gingival fibroblasts in periodontitis. Colombia Medica 38:197–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fenno JC, Hannam PM, Leung WK, Tamura M, Uitto VJ, McBride BC. 1998. Cytopathic effects of the major surface protein and the chymotrypsinlike protease of Treponema denticola. Infection And Immunity 66:1869–1877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tanabe SI, Bodet C, Grenier D. 2008. Treponema denticola lipooligosaccharide activates gingival fibroblasts and upregulates inflammatory mediator production. Journal of Cellular Physiology 216:727–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bartruff JB, Yukna RA, Layman DL. 2005. Outer membrane vesicles from Porphyromonas gingivalis affect the growth and function of cultured human gingival fibroblasts and umbilical vein endothelial cells. Journal of Periodontology 76:972–979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jia Y, Guo B, Yang W, Zhao Q, Jia W, Wu Y. 2015. Rho kinase mediates Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicle-induced suppression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase through ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK. Archives of Oral Biology 60:488–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. 2011. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature 469:323–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kroemer G, Marino G, Levine B. 2010. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Molecular Cell 40:280–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bullon P, Cordero MD, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa MDC, Gonzalez-Alonso A, Alfonsi S, García-Marín R, de Miguel M, Battino M. 2012. Autophagy in periodontitis patients and gingival fibroblasts: unraveling the link between chronic diseases and inflammation. BMC Medicine 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Irving AT, Mimuro H, Kufer TA, Lo C, Wheeler R, Turner LJ, Thomas BJ, Malosse C, Gantier MP, Casillas LN, Votta BJ, Bertin J, Boneca IG, Sasakawa C, Philpott DJ, Ferrero RL, Kaparakis-Liaskos M. 2014. The immune receptor NOD1 and kinase RIP2 interact with bacterial peptidoglycan on early endosomes to promote autophagy and inflammatory signaling. Cell Host and Microbe 15:623–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cecil JD, O'Brien-Simpson NM, Lenzo JC, Holden JA, Singleton W, Perez-Gonzalez A, Mansell A, Reynolds EC. 2017. Outer Membrane Vesicles Prime and Activate Macrophage Inflammasomes and Cytokine Secretion In Vitro and In Vivo. Front Immunol 8:1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Stashenko P, Teles R, D'Souza R. 1998. Periapical inflammatory responses and their modulation. Critical Reviews In Oral Biology And Medicine 9:498–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Silva TA, Garlet GP, Fukada SY, Silva JS, Cunha FQ. 2007. Chemokines in oral inflammatory diseases: apical periodontitis and periodontal disease. Journal of Dental Research 86:306–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Graunaite I, Lodiene G, Maciulskiene V. 2011. Pathogenesis of Apical Periodontitis: a Literature Review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Waller T, Kesper L, Hirschfeld J, Dommisch H, Kolpin J, Oldenburg J, Uebele J, Hoerauf A, Deschner J, Jepsen S, Bekeredjian-Ding I. 2016. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles induce selective tumor necrosis factor tolerance in a Toll-Like receptor 4 and mTOR-dependent manner. Infection and Immunity 84:1194–1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Qi MS, Miyakawa H, Kuramitsu HK. 2003. Porphyromonas gingivalis induces murine macrophage foam cell formation. Microbial Pathogenesis 35:259–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Imayoshi R, Cho T, Kaminishi H. 2011. NO production in RAW264 cells stimulated with Porphyromonas gingivalis extracellular vesicles. Oral Diseases 17:83–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hijiya T, Shibata Y, Hayakawa M, Abiko Y. 2010. A monoclonal antibody against FimA Type II Porphyromonas gingivalis inhibits IL-8 production in human gingival fibroblasts. Hybridoma 29:201–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Potempa J, Mikolajczyk-Pawlinska J, Brassell D, Nelson D, Thogersen IB, Enghild JJ, Travis J. 1998. Comparative properties of two cysteine proteinases (gingipains R), the products of two related but individual genes of Porphyromonas gingivalis. The Journal Of Biological Chemistry 273:21648–21657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Grenier D. 1992. Inactivation of human serum bactericidal activity by a trypsinlike protease isolated from Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infection And Immunity 60:1854–1857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Duncan L, Yoshioka M, Chandad F, Grenier D. 2004. Loss of lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14 from the surface of human macrophage-like cells mediated by Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles. Microbial Pathogenesis 36:319–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Nussbaum G, Ben-Adi S, Genzler T, Sela M, Rosen G. 2009. Involvement of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in the innate immune response to Treponema denticola and its outer sheath components. Infection And Immunity 77:3939–3947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kesavalu L, Ebersole JL, Machen RL, Holt SC. 1992. Porphyromonas gingivalis virulence in mice: induction of immunity to bacterial components. Infection And Immunity 60:1455–1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Nakao R, Hasegawa H, Ochiai K, Takashiba S, Ainai A, Ohnishi M, Watanabe H, Senpuku H. 2011. Outer membrane vesicles of Porphyromonas gingivalis elicit a mucosal immune response. PLOS ONE 6:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Nakao R, Hasegawa H, Dongying B, Ohnishi M, Senpuku H. 2016. Assessment of outer membrane vesicles of periodontopathic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis as possible mucosal immunogen. Vaccine 34:4626–4634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Human Microbiome Project C. 2012. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:207–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Faust K, Sathirapongsasuti JF, Izard J, Segata N, Gevers D, Raes J, Huttenhower C. 2012. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.O'Hara AM, Shanahan F. 2006. The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep 7:688–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Davenport AP, Nunez DJ, Hall JA, Kaumann AJ, Brown MJ. 1989. Autoradiographical localization of binding sites for porcine [125I]endothelin-1 in humans, pigs, and rats: functional relevance in humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 13 Suppl 5:S166–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zeng MY, Inohara N, Nunez G. 2017. Mechanisms of inflammation-driven bacterial dysbiosis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol 10:18–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Manichanh C, Borruel N, Casellas F, Guarner F. 2012. The gut microbiota in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:599–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. 2006. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027–1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Brennan CA, Garrett WS. 2016. Gut Microbiota, Inflammation, and Colorectal Cancer. Annu Rev Microbiol 70:395–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Naseer MI, Bibi F, Alqahtani MH, Chaudhary AG, Azhar EI, Kamal MA, Yasir M. 2014. Role of gut microbiota in obesity, type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 13:305–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Johansson ME, Phillipson M, Petersson J, Velcich A, Holm L, Hansson GC. 2008. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:15064–15069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kolling GL, Matthews KR. 1999. Export of virulence genes and Shiga toxin by membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1843–1848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kunsmann L, Ruter C, Bauwens A, Greune L, Gluder M, Kemper B, Fruth A, Wai SN, He X, Lloubes R, Schmidt MA, Dobrindt U, Mellmann A, Karch H, Bielaszewska M. 2015. Virulence from vesicles: Novel mechanisms of host cell injury by Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak strain. Sci Rep 5:13252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mayer CL, Leibowitz CS, Kurosawa S, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ. 2012. Shiga toxins and the pathophysiology of hemolytic uremic syndrome in humans and animals. Toxins (Basel) 4:1261–1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kim SH, Lee YH, Lee SH, Lee SR, Huh JW, Kim SU, Chang KT. 2011. Mouse model for hemolytic uremic syndrome induced by outer membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli O157:H7. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 63:427–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bielaszewska M, Ruter C, Kunsmann L, Greune L, Bauwens A, Zhang W, Kuczius T, Kim KS, Mellmann A, Schmidt MA, Karch H. 2013. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli hemolysin employs outer membrane vesicles to target mitochondria and cause endothelial and epithelial apoptosis. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bielaszewska M, Ruter C, Bauwens A, Greune L, Jarosch KA, Steil D, Zhang W, He X, Lloubes R, Fruth A, Kim KS, Schmidt MA, Dobrindt U, Mellmann A, Karch H. 2017. Host cell interactions of outer membrane vesicle-associated virulence factors of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: Intracellular delivery, trafficking and mechanisms of cell injury. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Elmi A, Dorey A, Watson E, Jagatia H, Inglis NF, Gundogdu O, Bajaj-Elliott M, Wren BW, Smith DGE, Dorrell N. 2018. The bile salt sodium taurocholate induces Campylobacter jejuni outer membrane vesicle production and increases OMV-associated proteolytic activity. Cell Microbiol 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Chatterjee D, Chaudhuri K. 2011. Association of cholera toxin with Vibrio cholerae outer membrane vesicles which are internalized by human intestinal epithelial cells. FEBS Lett 585:1357–1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Cervin J, Wands AM, Casselbrant A, Wu H, Krishnamurthy S, Cvjetkovic A, Estelius J, Dedic B, Sethi A, Wallom KL, Riise R, Backstrom M, Wallenius V, Platt FM, Lebens M, Teneberg S, Fandriks L, Kohler JJ, Yrlid U. 2018. GM1 ganglioside-independent intoxication by Cholera toxin. PLoS Pathog 14:e1006862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Rasti ES, Schappert ML, Brown AC. 2018. Association of Vibrio cholerae 569B outer membrane vesicles with host cells occurs in a GM1-independent manner. Cell Microbiol 20:e12828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Vanaja SK, Russo AJ, Behl B, Banerjee I, Yankova M, Deshmukh SD, Rathinam VAK. 2016. Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles Mediate Cytosolic Localization of LPS and Caspase-11 Activation. Cell 165:1106–1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Amieva M, Peek RM Jr. 2016. Pathobiology of Helicobacter pylori-Induced Gastric Cancer. Gastroenterology 150:64–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Fiocca R, Necchi V, Sommi P, Ricci V, Telford J, Cover TL, Solcia E. 1999. Release of Helicobacter pylori vacuolating cytotoxin by both a specific secretion pathway and budding of outer membrane vesicles. Uptake of released toxin and vesicles by gastric epithelium. J Pathol 188:220–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Keenan J, Day T, Neal S, Cook B, Perez-Perez G, Allardyce R, Bagshaw P. 2000. A role for the bacterial outer membrane in the pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett 182:259–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Chitcholtan K, Hampton MB, Keenan JI. 2008. Outer membrane vesicles enhance the carcinogenic potential of Helicobacter pylori. Carcinogenesis 29:2400–2405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Winter J, Letley D, Rhead J, Atherton J, Robinson K. 2014. Helicobacter pylori membrane vesicles stimulate innate pro- and anti-inflammatory responses and induce apoptosis in Jurkat T cells. Infect Immun 82:1372–1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hock BD, McKenzie JL, Keenan JI. 2017. Helicobacter pylori outer membrane vesicles inhibit human T cell responses via induction of monocyte COX-2 expression. Pathog Dis 75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ko SH, Rho DJ, Jeon JI, Kim YJ, Woo HA, Kim N, Kim JM. 2016. Crude Preparations of Helicobacter pylori Outer Membrane Vesicles Induce Upregulation of Heme Oxygenase-1 via Activating Akt-Nrf2 and mTOR-IkappaB Kinase-NF-kappaB Pathways in Dendritic Cells. Infect Immun 84:2162–2174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Canas MA, Fabrega MJ, Gimenez R, Badia J, Baldoma L. 2018. Outer Membrane Vesicles From Probiotic and Commensal Escherichia coli Activate NOD1-Mediated Immune Responses in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Front Microbiol 9:498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Fabrega MJ, Rodriguez-Nogales A, Garrido-Mesa J, Algieri F, Badia J, Gimenez R, Galvez J, Baldoma L. 2017. Intestinal Anti-inflammatory Effects of Outer Membrane Vesicles from Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 in DSS-Experimental Colitis in Mice. Front Microbiol 8:1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hickey CA, Kuhn KA, Donermeyer DL, Porter NT, Jin C, Cameron EA, Jung H, Kaiko GE, Wegorzewska M, Malvin NP, Glowacki RW, Hansson GC, Allen PM, Martens EC, Stappenbeck TS. 2015. Colitogenic Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Antigens Access Host Immune Cells in a Sulfatase-Dependent Manner via Outer Membrane Vesicles. Cell Host Microbe 17:672–680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Roy K, Hamilton DJ, Munson GP, Fleckenstein JM. 2011. Outer membrane vesicles induce immune responses to virulence proteins and protect against colonization by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18:1803–1808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.De Benedetto G, Alfini R, Cescutti P, Caboni M, Lanzilao L, Necchi F, Saul A, MacLennan CA, Rondini S, Micoli F. 2017. Characterization of O-antigen delivered by Generalized Modules for Membrane Antigens (GMMA) vaccine candidates against nontyphoidal Salmonella. Vaccine 35:419–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Adriani R, Mousavi Gargari SL, Nazarian S, Sarvary S, Noroozi N. 2018. Immunogenicity of Vibrio cholerae outer membrane vesicles secreted at various environmental conditions. Vaccine 36:322–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Sinha R, Howlader DR, Ta A, Mitra S, Das S, Koley H. 2017. Retinoic acid pre-treatment down regulates V. cholerae outer membrane vesicles induced acute inflammation and enhances mucosal immunity. Vaccine 35:3534–3547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Leitner DR, Lichtenegger S, Temel P, Zingl FG, Ratzberger D, Roier S, Schild-Prufert K, Feichter S, Reidl J, Schild S. 2015. A combined vaccine approach against Vibrio cholerae and ETEC based on outer membrane vesicles. Front Microbiol 6:823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hays MP, Houben D, Yang Y, Luirink J, Hardwidge PR. 2018. Immunization With Skp Delivered on Outer Membrane Vesicles Protects Mice Against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Challenge. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wang S, Gao J, Wang Z. 2018. Outer membrane vesicles for vaccination and targeted drug delivery. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol doi: 10.1002/wnan.1523:e1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Schager AE, Dominguez-Medina CC, Necchi F, Micoli F, Goh YS, Goodall M, Flores-Langarica A, Bobat S, Cook CNL, Arcuri M, Marini A, King LDW, Morris FC, Anderson G, Toellner KM, Henderson IR, Lopez-Macias C, MacLennan CA, Cunningham AF. 2018. IgG Responses to Porins and Lipopolysaccharide within an Outer Membrane-Based Vaccine against Nontyphoidal Salmonella Develop at Discordant Rates. MBio 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Liu Q, Yi J, Liang K, Zhang X, Liu Q. 2017. Outer Membrane Vesicles Derived from Salmonella Enteritidis Protect against the Virulent Wild-Type Strain Infection in a Mouse Model. J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1519–1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Choi HI, Kim M, Jeon J, Han JK, Kim KS. 2017. Overexpression of MicA induces production of OmpC-enriched outer membrane vesicles that protect against Salmonella challenge. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 490:991–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Bryant WA, Stentz R, Le Gall G, Sternberg MJE, Carding SR, Wilhelm T. 2017. In Silico Analysis of the Small Molecule Content of Outer Membrane Vesicles Produced by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Indicates an Extensive Metabolic Link between Microbe and Host. Front Microbiol 8:2440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES