Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2019 Jan 23;25:675–690. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913054

Neuron-Specific Enolase Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Gene Rearrangements

Shouying Li 1,2,3,E,*, Lianjing Cao 1,2,3,D,*, Xinyue Wang 1,2,3,C, Fan Wang 1,2,3,B, Liuchun Wang 1,2,3,F, Richeng Jiang 1,2,3,A,
PMCID: PMC6353286  PMID: 30673691

Abstract

Background

An extensive body of research reveals the clinical value of serum tumor markers in lung cancer patients, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), cytokeratin-19 fragments (Cyfra21-1), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), but little is known about the clinical properties of these serum tumor markers in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer patients.

Matreial/Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients harboring ALK rearrangements and 520 patients without ALK rearrangements, and all these patients were treated exclusively by surgery between 2011 and 2016.

Results

NSE level (P=0.007 for OS) was identified as an independent prognostic factor among patients with resected ALK-positive adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Conclusions

A high level of NSE is associated with worse outcome among resected lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring ALK rearrangements.

MeSH Keywords: Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase

Background

The prognostic factors of lung cancer might be important in daily clinical practice due to its high prevalence and mortality rates. In recent years, the efficacy of cancer treatment has achieved a qualitative leap since many oncogenic drivers have been discovered, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genes, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). These developments have improved molecular diagnosis and accurate therapy for lung cancer patients.

The ALK gene was first described as NPM-ALK fusion protein, mainly in anaplastic large-cell lymphomas [1]. It accounts for about 6.7% of NSCLCs [2] and 11% of lung adenocarcinoma [3]. Although a low proportion of lung cancer patients have ALK rearrangements, the total number of the cases is considerable and these patients would benefit from molecular-targeted treatment. Thus, it is important to explore predictive factors among lung cancer patients that harbor ALK rearrangements in clinical practice.

Serum tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) [4], squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) [5], cytokeratin-19 fragments (Cyfra21-1) [6], and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) [7], have been found to be useful biomarkers in lung cancer, but no consistent view has been reached yet. Indeed, the clinical significance of these serum tumor markers in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma have not been thoroughly investigated.

In this study, we carried out a retrospective clinical research of a total 574 operable lung adenocarcinoma patients in which 54 patients had ALK rearrangements. We covered clinical factors between serum tumor markers and the clinical features in patients of stage I, II, and III who underwent partial or complete surgical operation. We explored the clinical features in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma and assessed whether these serum tumor markers are independent indicators for prognosis in these patients.

Material and Methods

Patient selection

We retrospectively analyzed a database of consecutive lung adenocarcinoma patients treated by surgery between March 2011 and August 2016 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. Approval by the Research Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute was gained and its purpose was to explore the clinical significance of serum tumor markers at the beginning of diagnosis as prognostic factors in the subset of lung adenocarcinoma patients with ALK rearrangements. Examinations prior to the operation included physical examination, level of serum tumor biomarkers, blood chemistry analysis, CT scan, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, brain MRI, and bone scanning. All patients underwent partial or complete surgical resection exclusively. The selection criteria were as follows: (a) the pathological diagnosis was lung adenocarcinoma; (b) ALK-rearrangement positive (by the Ventana ALK [D5F3] IHC Kit, Roche, Switzerland); (c) clinical stages I, II, IIIA, or IIIB disease defined by the tumor node metastasis (TNM) criteria of NSCLC (AJCC,7th edition) and the TNM stage assessment was according to CT scans, brain MRI, and bone emission CT scans; (d) patients were untreated at the time routine blood analyses were performed; and (e) preoperative evaluation showed that surgery was appropriate for patients. Adjuvant treatment included chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapy. Follow-up data were gathered directly from the clinical record or telephone follow-up. CT scans were checked every 3 or 4 months to monitor recurrence and then annually after 3 years. Disease-free survival (DFS) was from the date of surgery to recurrence, or the date of final follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was measured to the date to death caused by disease or to the date of final follow-up.

Tumor-associated antigens

The concentrations of serum tumor biomarkers were detected by immunoenzymometric assay (Roche Diagnostics, China) within 1 week before the operation. The cut-off values of serum tumor markers were as follows: CEA 5.0 ng/ml, SCCA 1.5 ng/ml, Cyfra21-1 3.3 ng/ml, and NSE 15.2 ng/ml, using the reference values provided by the manufacturer.

Statistical analysis

SPSS Statistics 24 (IBM Corporation, NY, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Univariate analyses of the comparisons of baseline clinical characteristics between cohorts were carried out using the chi-squared test. Survival was conducted using Cox regression analysis. To examine differences in survival between different cohorts, the log-rank test was used. Cox proportional hazard method was applied to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the multivariate Cox method was performed using the backward selection method. In all analyses, a p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

Our study cohort included 574 lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent partial or complete surgical resection between 2011 and 2016. As shown in Table 1, 267 (46.5%) of the patients were male and 307 (53.5%) were female. Histological diagnoses were all adenocarcinoma. The clinical stages were as follows: 288 stage I, 92 stage II, 178 stage IIIA, and 16 stage IIIB. There were 517 patients who underwent lobectomy, 36 underwent pneumonectomy, and 17 underwent wedge resection.

Table 1.

All patient characteristics (n=574).

Characteristics n (%)
Age
 ≤60 336 (58.5)
 >60 238 (41.5)
Sex
 Male 267 (46.5)
 Female 307 (53.5)
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 275 (47.9)
 Never smoker 291 (50.7)
Pathological stage
 I 288 (50.2)
 II 92 (16)
 IIIA 178 (31)
 IIIB 16 (2.8)
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 348 (60.6)
 >3 cm 226 (39.4)
Regional LN metastasis
 No 342 (59.6)
 Yes 232 (40.4)
Surgical resection
 Pneumonectomy 36 (6.3)
 Lobectomy 517 (90.1)
 Wedge resection 17 (3.0)
Adjuvant treatment
 No 298 (51.9)
 Yes 276 (48.1)
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 364 (63.4)
 >5.0 ng/ml 208 (36.2)
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 525 (91.5)
 >1.5 ng/ml 47 (8.2)
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 382 (66.6)
 >3.3 ng/ml 190 (33.1)
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 451 (78.6)
 >15.2 ng/ml 120 (20.9)

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen; Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase.

Of all 574 patients, 276 (48.1%) received adjuvant treatment including platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor, and the other 298 (51.9%) received no postoperative treatment. The average DFS in this cohort was 25.20 months and the average OS was 30.59 months. By the final follow-up date, 148 patients had died.

Among the ALK-positive patients, 25 (46.3%) were male and 29 (53.7%) were female (Supplementary Table 1). The clinical stages were as follows: 27 were stage I, 11 were stage II, 13 were stage IIIA, and 3 were stage IIIB. Fifty-one patients received lobectomy, 2 received pneumonectomy, and 1 received wedge resection. The average DFS in this cohort was 18.47 months and the average OS was 25.43 months. By the last follow-up date, 7 patients had died.

Among the ALK-negative patients, 242 (46.5%) were male while 278 (53.5%) and were female (Supplementary Table 1). The clinical stages were as follows: 261 stage I, 81 stage II, 165 stage IIIA, and 13 stage IIIB. There were 466 patients who underwent lobectomy, 34 had pneumonectomy, and 16 had wedge resection. The average DFS in this cohort was 25.90 months and the average OS was 31.12 months. By the last follow-up date, 141 patients had died.

Correlation between ALK expression and the clinicopathological characteristics

We further analyzed the correlation between ALK expression and clinical characteristics (Supplementary Table 2). Univariate analysis revealed ALK expression was associated with clinicopathologic characteristics, including age (P=0.006), smoking history (P=0.008), CEA level (P≤0.001), and SCCA level (P=0.018). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of ALK expression and clinical factors showed that ALK expression was associated with age (P=0.006) and smoking history (P=0.008) (Supplementary Table 3).

Univariate and multivariate analysis of all patients

Univariate analysis in all patients showed that clinical stage, surgical resection, metastasis in regional lymph node, tumor size, CEA level, and Cyfra21-1 level were associated with DFS, while OS was associated with clinical stage, surgical resection, metastasis in regional lymph node, CEA level, and Cyfra21-1 level (Table 2, Supplementary Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B). To find possible independent prognostic factors, we next conducted multivariate DFS and OS analysis in which clinical stage (P≤0.001 for DFS, P≤0.001 for OS), surgical resection (P=0.015 for DFS, P=0.011 for OS), and Cyfra21-1 (P=0.002 for DFS, P≤0.001 for OS) were identified as independent factors predicting DFS and OS (Table 2).

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of DFS and OS in all patients.

Variables DFS OS
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
n Median DFS (mo) P* HR (95%CI) P* n Median OS (mo) P* HR (95%CI) P*
Age (years)
 ≤60 336 24.93 0.893 336 30.57 0.918
 >60 238 25.59 238 30.61
Sex
 Male 267 24.87 0.600 267 29.87 0.179
 Female 307 25.49 307 31.21
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 275 24.73 0.494 275 30.03 0.267
 Never smoker 291 25.47 291 30.84
Pathological stage
 I 288 27.33 0.001 1.479 (1.298, 1.684) ≤0.001 288 31.21 0.001 1.425 (1.208, 1.682) 0.001
 II 92 25.54 92 31.08
 IIIA 178 22.11 178 29.54
 IIIB 16 19.25 16 27.50
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 348 25.67 0.003 0.601 348 30.15 0.239
 >3 cm 226 24.48 226 31.26
Regional LN metastasis
 No 342 27.12 0.001 0.274 342 30.94 0.001 0.193
 Yes 232 22.37 232 30.06
Surgical resection
 Pneumonectomy 36 22.38 0.031 1.354 (1.060, 1.731) 0.015 36 39.62 0.019 1.477 (1.093, 1.996) 0.011
 Lobectomy 517 25.29 517 30.47
 Wedge resection 17 27.82 17 34.50
Adjuvant treatment
 No 298 24.94 0.394 298 29.17 0.066
 Yes 276 25.49 276 32.14
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 364 26.26 0.001 1.308 (1.013, 1.688) 0.039 364 30.68 0.005 0.203
 >5.0 ng/ml 208 23.36 208 30.44
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 525 25.55 0.096 525 31.04 0.164
 >1.5 ng/ml 47 21.31 47 25.59
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 382 26.28 0.001 1.482 (1.156, 1.900) 0.002 382 31.32 0.001 1.818 (1.312, 2.521) 0.001
 >3.3 ng/ml 190 23.04 190 29.14
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 451 25.33 0.145 451 30.64 0.059
 >15.2 ng/ml 120 24.67 120 30.42

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen; Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase; DFS – disease-free survival; OS – overall survival; HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of ALK-positive and -negative patients

For ALK-positive patients, by univariate analysis, we found that DFS was related to smoking history, clinical stage, metastasis in regional lymph node, CEA level, and Cyfra21-1 level, while clinical stage, CEA, NSE, and Cyfra21-1 were correlated with OS (Table 3, Supplementary Figure 1C, 1D, 2C, 2D). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, clinical stage (P=0.013) and Cyfra21-1 level (P=0.030) were predictive factors for DFS., while clinical stage (P=0.004) and NSE level (P=0.007) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of DFS and OS in ALK positive patients.

Variables DFS OS
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
n Median DFS (mo) P* HR (95%CI) P* n Median OS (mo) P* HR (95%CI) P*
Age (years)
 ≤60 41 18.25 0125 41 23.24 0.370
 >60 13 19.16 13 32.34
Sex
 Male 25 16.98 0.519 25 21.37 0.298
 Female 29 19.75 29 28.92
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 17 14.34 0.019 0.194 17 20.42 0.281
 Never smoker 37 20.36 37 27.73
 Pathological stage
 I 27 20.16 0.004 17.37 (1.122, 2.687) 0.013 27 26.12 0.004 4.043 (1.551, 10.535) 0.004
 II 11 21.77 11 31.52
 IIIA 13 13.59 13 20.16
 IIIB 3 12.27 3 19.72
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 36 19.42 0.098 36 25.92 0.362
 >3 cm 18 16.57 18 24.45
Regional LN metastasis
 No 30 19.97 0.030 0.997 30 25.51 0.114
 Yes 24 16.59 24 25.33
Surgical resection
 Pneumonectomy 2 6.73 0.521 2 13.50 0.303
 Lobectomy 51 18.92 51 26.03
 Wedge resection 1 18.83 1 18.83
Adjuvant treatment
 No 15 21.30 0.082 15 28.47 0.198
 Yes 39 17.38 39 24.26
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 50 19.26 0.023 0.153 50 25.80 0.002 0.767
 >5.0 ng/ml 4 8.62 4 20.81
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 45 19.17 0.449 45 26.47 0.818
 >1.5 ng/ml 9 14.94 9 20.24
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 36 20.66 0.009 2.659 (1.099, 6.433) 0.030 36 26.16 0.048 0.231
 >3.3 ng/ml 18 14.09 18 23.96
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 44 19.51 0.249 44 26.83 0.005 12.552 (1.977, 79.692) 0.007
 >15.2 ng/ml 10 13.89 10 19.26

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen; Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase; DFS – disease-free survival; OS – overall survival; HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.

For ALK-negative patients, by univariate analysis, we found that DFS was related to clinical stage, surgical resection, maximum size of tumor, metastasis in regional lymph node, CEA, and Cyfra21-1, while clinical stage, surgical resection, adjuvant treatment, metastasis in regional lymph node, CEA level, and Cyfra21-1 level were correlated with OS (Supplementary Table 4, Supplementary Figures 1E, 1F, 2E, 2F). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, clinical stage (P≤0.001), surgical resection (P=0.013), CEA (P=0.022), and Cyfra21-1 level (P=0.008) were independent factor predicting DFS. Metastasis in regional lymph node (P≤0.001), surgical resection (P=0.013), and Cyfra21-1 level (P≤0.001) were independent prognostic factors predicting OS.

NSE analysis

For all 574 patients, the average NSE level was 14.35 ng/ml. Patients were stratified into lower and higher NSE groups, one with NSE level ≤15.2 ng/ml (n=451) and another with NSE level >15.2 ng/ml (n=120) (Table 2). The average DFS in high-NSE patients was 24.67 months as compared with 25.33 months for low-NSE patients. The average OS for high-NSE patients was 30.64 months as compared with 30.42 months for low-NSE patients. The survival analysis revealed that high serum NSE level was not relevant to OS (P=0.059) (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of OS (A) according to NSE level in all patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of OS (B) according to NSE level in ALK-positive patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of OS (C) according to NSE level in ALK-negative patients.

For ALK-positive patients, the average NSE level was 13.86 ng/ml. Patients were also stratified into lower (n=44) and higher (n=10) NSE groups (Table 3). The average DFS in high-NSE patients was 13.89 months, as compared with 19.51 months for low-NSE patients. The average OS for high-NSE patients was 19.26 months as compared with 26.83 months for low-NSE patients. The survival analysis revealed that high serum NSE level was significantly relevant to decreased OS (P=0.005) (Figure 1B). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that NSE was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P=0.007).

For ALK-negative patients, the survival analysis revealed that high serum NSE level was not associated with OS (P=0.189) (Figure 1C).

Discussion

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase is a receptor protein-tyrosine kinase of the insulin receptor protein-tyrosine kinase superfamily. EML4-ALK fusion was recently reported as a neoteric targeted therapy molecular in lung cancer and has become increasingly important in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Several studies have reported that more ALK-positive cases could be seen in light- or never-smoking patients [8], type of adenocarcinoma [9], and females and young patients [10]. ALK rearrangement has also been reported to be more common in males (P=0.039) [11], but other studies reported no sex difference [8,12]. In our study, consistent with the above-mentioned studies, ALK expression was strongly correlated with age and smoking history and was more common in never-smoking and young patients. However, no sex difference was found in our study cohort. Due to the low positive rate or other reasons, the prognostic factors in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients are unclear and no prognostic models have been developed. Therefore, it is necessary to find effective prognostic factors among these patients.

A recent study including 173 ALK-positive NSCLC patients reported that neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were closely related to survival, and PLR was a significant prognostic factor in ALK-positive NSCLC [13]. In the study by Suzuki et al. [14], CD56+ was reported to be associated with poor prognosis (P=0.002) in both ALK-negative and ALK-positive subgroups. Further research is needed to better predict the prognosis of ALK-positive patients. Serum tumor makers are routinely used in examinations after admission to help guide diagnosis, classification, and treatment of these patients. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report that the level of NSE in blood is an independent prognostic factor in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients.

CEA is a kind of glycoprotein involved in programmed cell death and cell adhesion, and is normally secreted during embryonic development, but the secretion stops before birth. Its specialized sialofucosylated glycoforms serve as functional ligands that may be vital to cancer cell metastasis [15]. CEA was reported to be an unspecific serum tumor marker with abnormal expression in various solid tumors. No consensus has been reached on the prognostic value of pretreatment CEA levels in lung cancer. Tomita et al. [16] reported that CEA was a useful serum tumor marker in NSCLC and that CEA was an important prognostic factor in NSCLC patients (p<0.0001), but other studies did not find this [5] To date, there have been no related reports on the relationship between CEA and ALK status. In our study, increased level of CEA was correlated with decreased DFS and OS in ALK-positive patients. CEA is involved in adhesion between cells and extracellular matrix, and its overexpression can inhibit cell differentiation and damage the structure of tissues. This could also partially be attributed to glycosylation of glycoproteins, which promote metastasis and invasion. The elevated level of CEA is one of the manifestations of activation of glycosylated enzymes, and other relevant molecules include AFP (α-fetoprotein) and NSE (neuron-specific enolase). Glycosylase activation leads to glycosylation of glycoproteins, which can affect ALK phosphorylation and downstream signaling [1719], and thus have an effect on the prognosis of ALK-positive patients. In the present study, our cases were all adenocarcinoma patients, and CEA has already been shown to be predict poor prognosis in patients with resected lung adenocarcinomas [20].

CYFRA 21-1 is a fragment of cytokeratin (CK) 19. CK is the principal structural element of the cytoskeleton (keratin filaments) of epithelial cells, including bronchial epithelial cells. It elevated in many cell types of lung cancer, but mainly in squamous cell carcinoma [21]. It is reported that preoperative serum CYFRA 21-1 was a poor independent prognostic factor for adenocarcinoma of lung after surgery [22], which is consistent with our study. However, CYFRA 21-1 was reported to be unrelated to cancer recurrence or survival by Matsuoka et al. and Blankenburg et al., respectively [23,24]. In our study, CYFRA 21-1 was found to be associated with decreased DFS and OS in ALK-positive patients. High serum CYFRA 21-1 level might reflect poor differentiation because multi-directional differentiation indicates tumor aggressiveness and is also considered as a poor prognostic factor in early-stage lung cancer.

NSE is a neuron-specific isoenzyme of enolase, also known as enolase-γ. The clinical significance of NSE in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) had been well accepted, since NSE is reported to be frequently elevated in patients diagnosed with SCLC [25]. However, the value of NSE in NSCLC remains unclear. In the study of Pujol et al. [7], NSE was reported to be a prognostic factor for survival. Similar results were found by other studies, including Jacot et al. [26] and Ferrigno et al. [27]. However, in the study of Reinmuth et al. [28], preoperative serum NSE level was not found to be related to prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, no research has focussed on determining the predictive role of NSE in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients. As described in our study, NSE is an independent prognostic factor for survival in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients. Since mixed element of SCLC-NSCLC may arise in a small fraction of all lung cancer cases [29] and some NSCLC patients do have an elevated NSE level, we hypothesized that the association between poor prognosis and elevated pretreatment serum NSE level in NSCLC patients might be due a co-existing neuroendocrine or small cell component in the solid tumor or tumor glucose metabolism [30]. Recently, Choi et al. [31] reported that higher glucose metabolism was found in EML4-ALK-rearranged NSCLC than in EML4-ALK-negative NSCLC patients, revealing that EML4-ALK may play a role in regulating glucose metabolism. Ma et al. [32] reported that EML4-ALK activates aerobic glycolysis, while fast ATP and a carbon source for biosynthesis require a high glycolysis rate, and thus make cancer cells replicate faster. NSE is considered a key enzyme in glycolysis and it plays an important role in aerobic glycolysis; this could partially explain how NSE affects the prognosis of ALK-positive patients. However, the adverse prognostic significance of elevated NSE was also presumed to be more malignant in lung cancers with neuroendocrine differentiation.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is not generally recommended for early-stage patients in daily clinical work. As described in our study, an elevated serum NSE level is associated with poor prognosis in ALK-positive patients. Therefore, we suggest postoperative adjuvant therapy for resected ALK-positive patients with elevated serum NSE levels.

Our study has some limitations. First, it was a single-center, retrospective investigation, so it is possible that selection bias may have affected our findings. Second, the study included an insufficient number of ALK-positive to provide strong conclusions. Nevertheless, it is the first study to show that elevated NSE level is a potential biomarker of poor prognosis for ALK-positive patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma. Further research is needed on the clinical value of NSE in prognosis.

Conclusions

High serum NSE level is not relevant to decreased OS in ALK-negative patients, but NSE is an independent prognostic factor in ALK-positive patients.

Supplementary Files

Supplementary Table 1.

Patient characteristics in ALK positive(n=54) and ALK negative (n=520).

Characteristics ALK positive
n (%)
ALK negative
n (%)
Age
 ≤60 41 (75.9) 295 (56.7)
 >60 13 (24.1) 225 (43.3)
Sex
 Male 25 (46.3) 242 (46.5)
 Female 29 (53.7) 278 (53.5)
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 17 (31.5) 258 (49.5)
 Never smoker 37 (68.5) 254 (48.8)
Pathological stage
 I 27 (50.0) 261 (50.2)
 II 11 (20.4) 81 (15.6)
 IIIA 13 (24.1) 165 (31.7)
 IIIB 3 (5.6) 13 (2.5)
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 36 (66.7) 312 (60)
 >3 cm 18 (33.3) 208 (40)
Regional LN metastasis
 No 30 (55.6) 312 (60)
Yes 24 (44.4) 208 (40)
Surgical resection
 Pneumonectomy 2 (3.7) 34 (6.5)
 Lobectomy 51 (94.4) 466 (89.6)
 Wedge resection 1 (1.9) 16 (3.1)
Adjuvant treatment
 No 15 (27.8) 283 (54.4)
 Yes 39 (72.2) 237 (45.6)
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 50 (92.6) 314 (60.4)
 >5.0 ng/ml 4 (7.4) 204 (39.2)
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 45 (83.3) 480 (92.3)
 >1.5 ng/ml 9 (16.7) 38 (7.3)
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 36 (66.7) 346 (66.5)
 >3.3 ng/ml 18 (33.3) 172 (33.1)
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 44 (81.5) 407 (78.3)
 >15.2 ng/ml 10 (18.5) 110 (21.2)

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen; Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase.

Supplementary Table 2.

Correlation between ALK expression and the clinicopathological characteristics.

Characteristics n (%) ALK positive ALK negative P*
Age 0.006
 ≤60 336 (58.5) 41 (7.1) 295 (51.4)
 >60 238 (41.5) 13 (2.3) 225 (39.2)
Sex
 Male 267 (46.5) 25 (4.4) 242 (42.2) 0.973
 Female 307 (53.5) 29 (5.1) 278 (48.4)
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 275 (47.9) 17 (3.0) 258 (45.6) 0.008
 Never smoker 291 (50.7) 37 (6.5) 254 (44.9)
Pathological stage
 I 288 (50.2) 27 (4.7) 261 (45.5) 0.353
 II 92 (16) 11 (1.9) 81 (14.1)
 IIIA 178 (31) 13 (2.3) 165 (28.7)
 IIIB 16 (2.8) 3 (0.5) 13 (2.3)
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 348 (60.6) 36 (6.3) 312 (54.4) 0.340
 >3 cm 226 (39.4) 18 (3.1) 208 (36.2)
Regional LN metastasis
 No 342 (59.6) 30 (5.2) 312 (54.4) 0.526
 Yes 232 (40.4) 24 (4.2) 208 (36.2)
Surgical resection
 Pneumonectomy 36 (6.3) 2 (0.4) 34 (6.0) 0.609
 Lobectomy 517 (90.1) 51 (8.9) 466 (81.8)
 Wedge resection 17 (3.0) 1 (0.2) 16 (2.8)
Adjuvant treatment
 No 298 (51.9) 15 (2.6) 283 (49.3) 0.001
 Yes 276 (48.1) 39 (6.8) 237 (41.3)
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 364 (63.4) 50 (8.7) 314 (54.9) 0.001
 >5.0 ng/ml 208 (36.2) 4 (0.7) 204 (35.7)
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 525 (91.5) 45 (7.9) 480 (83.9) 0.018
 >1.5 ng/ml 47 (8.2) 9 (1.6) 38 (6.6)
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 382 (66.6) 36 (6.3) 346 (60.5) 0.985
 >3.3 ng/ml 190 (33.1) 18 (3.1) 172 (30.1)
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 451 (78.6) 44 (7.7) 407 (71.3) 0.636
 >15.2 ng/ml 120 (20.9) 10 (1.8) 110 (19.3)

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen; Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase.

Supplementary Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for ALK expression.

Characteristics HR (95%CI) P*
Age 0.375 (0.190, 0.740) 0.006
Smoking history 0.435 (0.232, 0.813) 0.008

HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.

Supplementary Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of DFS and OS in ALK negative patients.

Variable DFS OS
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
n Median DFS (mo) P* HR (95%CI) P* n Median OS (mo) P* HR (95%CI) P*
Age (years)
 ≤60 295 25.85 0.646 295 31.59 0.694
 >60 225 25.96 225 30.51
Sex
 Male 242 25.69 0.675 242 30.75 0.269
 Female 278 26.09 278 31.45
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 258 25.41 0.757 258 30.66 0.451
 Never smoker 254 26.21 254 31.30
Pathological stage
 I 261 28.19 0.026 1.450 (1.265, 1.662) 0.001 261 31.75 0.005 0.370
 II 81 25.69 81 30.99
 IIIA 165 22.78 165 30.34
 IIIB 13 20.86 13 29.29
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 312 26.39 0.006 0.583 312 30.64 0.375
 >3 cm 208 25.17 208 31.84
Regional LN metastasis
 No 312 27.81 0.001 0.292 312 31.46 0.001 2.674 (1.862, 3.842) 0.001
 Yes 208 23.04 208 30.61
Surgical resection
Pneumonectomy 34 23.30 0.029 1.376 (1.070, 1.770) 0.013 34 30.57 0.030 1.482 (1.087, 2.019) 0.013
 Lobectomy 466 25.99 466 30.96
 Wedge resection 16 28.39 16 35.49
Adjuvant treatment
 No 283 25.13 0.761 283 29.21 0.045 0.440 (0.304, 0.637) 0.001
 Yes 237 26.82 237 33.41
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 314 27.37 0.001 1.367 (1.046, 1.787) 0.022 314 31.46 0.034 0.479
 >5.0 ng/ml 204 23.65 204 30.63
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 480 26.15 0.153 480 31.47 0.126
 >1.5 ng/ml 38 22.82 38 26.85
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 346 26.87 0.001 1.421 (1.095, 1.843) 0.008 346 31.85 0.001 1.839 (1.313, 2.575) 0.001
 >3.3 ng/ml 172 23.98 172 29.68
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 407 25.96 0.205 407 31.05 0.189
 >15.2 ng/ml 110 25.65 110 31.44

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen;Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase; DFS – disease-free survival; OS – overall survival; HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.

Supplementary Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (A) and OS (B) according to CEA level in all patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (C) and OS (D) according to CEA level in ALK-positive patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (E) and OS (F) according to CEA level in ALK-negative patients.

Supplementary Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (A) and OS (B) according to Cyfra21-1 level in all patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (C) and OS (D) according to Cyfra21-1 level in ALK-positive patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (E) and OS (F) according to Cyfra21-1 level in ALK-negative patients.

Abbreviations

ALK

anaplastic lymphoma kinase

EML4-ALK

echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase

CEA

carcinoembryonic antigen

Cyfra21-1

cytokeratin-19 fragments

SCCA

squamous cell carcinoma antigen

NSE

neuron-specific enolase

AFP

α-fetoprotein

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

PFS

progression-free survival

OS

overall survival

NLR

neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio

PLR

platelet- lymphocyte ratio

NSCLC

non-small-cell lung cancer

SCLC

small cell lung cancer

Footnotes

Source of support: This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81372517 and No. 81000899) and the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission Key Application Research Projects (No. 11JCZDJC18900) for Richeng Jiang

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Morris SW, Kirstein MN, Valentine MB, et al. Fusion of a kinase gene, ALK, to a nucleolar protein gene, NPM, in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Science. 1994;263:1281–84. doi: 10.1126/science.8122112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448:561–66. doi: 10.1038/nature05945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Possidente L, Landriscina M, Patitucci G, et al. ALK rearrangement in specific subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma: Immunophenotypic and morphological features. Med Oncol. 2017;34:76. doi: 10.1007/s12032-017-0936-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cedres S, Nunez I, Longo M, et al. Serum tumor markers CEA, CYFRA21-1, and CA-125 are associated with worse prognosis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Clin Lung Cancer. 2011;12:172–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moro D, Villemain D, Vuillez JP, et al. CEA, CYFRA21-1 and SCC in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 1995;13:169–76. doi: 10.1016/0169-5002(95)00485-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pujol JL, Molinier O, Ebert W, et al. CYFRA 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:2097–105. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pujol JL, Boher JM, Grenier J, Quantin X. Cyfra 21-1, neuron specific enolase and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer: prospective study in 621 patients. Lung Cancer. 2001;31:221–31. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00186-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim MH, Shim HS, Kang DR, et al. Clinical and prognostic implications of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in never-smokers with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2014;83:389–95. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Inamura K, Takeuchi K, Togashi Y, et al. EML4-ALK fusion is linked to histological characteristics in a subset of lung cancers. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:13–17. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31815e8b60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paik JH, Choi CM, Kim H, et al. Clinicopathologic implication of ALK rearrangement in surgically resected lung cancer: A proposal of diagnostic algorithm for ALK-rearranged adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2012;76:403–9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Mino-Kenudson M, et al. Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALK. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4247–53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim HR, Shim HS, Chung JH, et al. Distinct clinical features and outcomes in never-smokers with nonsmall cell lung cancer who harbor EGFR or KRAS mutations or ALK rearrangement. Cancer. 2012;118:729–39. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han Y, Wang J, Hong L, et al. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic factor in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2017;13:51–61. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Suzuki R, Kagami Y, Takeuchi K, et al. Prognostic significance of CD56 expression for ALK-positive and ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma of T/null cell phenotype. Blood. 2000;96:2993–3000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2012;76:138–43. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tomita M, Shimizu T, Ayabe T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumour marker index based on preoperative CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:3099–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Contessa JN, Bhojani MS, Freeze HH, et al. Molecular imaging of N-linked glycosylation suggests glycan biosynthesis is a novel target for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:3205–14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Contessa JN, Bhojani MS, Freeze HH, et al. Inhibition of N-linked glycosylation disrupts receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3803–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Del Grosso F, De Mariano M, Passoni L, et al. Inhibition of N-linked glycosylation impairs ALK phosphorylation and disrupts pro-survival signaling in neuroblastoma cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:525. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jiang R, Wang X, Li K. Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers is EGFR mutation-specific in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:26823–36. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Niklinski J, Furman M, Chyczewska E, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the new tumour marker CYFRA 21-1 in patients with squamous cell lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 1995;8:291–94. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08020291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Park SY, Lee JG, Kim J, et al. Preoperative serum CYFRA 21-1 level as a prognostic factor in surgically treated adenocarcinoma of lung. Lung Cancer. 2013;79:156–60. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matsuoka K, Sumitomo S, Nakashima N, et al. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and CYFRA21-1 in patients with pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32:435–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Blankenburg F, Hatz R, Nagel D, et al. Preoperative CYFRA 21-1 and CEA as prognostic factors in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer: External validation of a prognostic score. Tumour Biol. 2008;29:272–77. doi: 10.1159/000152945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jaques G, Auerbach B, Pritsch M, et al. Evaluation of serum neural cell adhesion molecule as a new tumor marker in small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 1993;72:418–25. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930715)72:2<418::aid-cncr2820720217>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jacot W, Quantin X, Boher JM, et al. Brain metastases at the time of presentation of non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-centric AERIO analysis of prognostic factors. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:903–9. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ferrigno D, Buccheri G, Giordano C. Neuron-specific enolase is an effective tumour marker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Lung Cancer. 2003;41:311–20. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(03)00232-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reinmuth N, Brandt B, Semik M, et al. Prognostic impact of Cyfra21-1 and other serum markers in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2002;36:265–70. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(02)00009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yesner R, Carter D. Pathology of carcinoma of the lung. Changing patterns. Clin Chest Med. 1982;3:257–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Suh KJ, Keam B, Kim M, et al. Serum neuron-specific enolase levels predict the efficacy of first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17:245–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.11.012. e241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Choi H, Paeng JC, Kim DW, et al. Metabolic and metastatic characteristics of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma on FDG PET/CT. Lung Cancer. 2013;79:242–47. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ma Y, Yu C, Mohamed EM, et al. A causal link from ALK to hexokinase II overexpression and hyperactive glycolysis in EML4-ALK-positive lung cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35:6132–42. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1.

Patient characteristics in ALK positive(n=54) and ALK negative (n=520).

Characteristics ALK positive
n (%)
ALK negative
n (%)
Age
 ≤60 41 (75.9) 295 (56.7)
 >60 13 (24.1) 225 (43.3)
Sex
 Male 25 (46.3) 242 (46.5)
 Female 29 (53.7) 278 (53.5)
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 17 (31.5) 258 (49.5)
 Never smoker 37 (68.5) 254 (48.8)
Pathological stage
 I 27 (50.0) 261 (50.2)
 II 11 (20.4) 81 (15.6)
 IIIA 13 (24.1) 165 (31.7)
 IIIB 3 (5.6) 13 (2.5)
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 36 (66.7) 312 (60)
 >3 cm 18 (33.3) 208 (40)
Regional LN metastasis
 No 30 (55.6) 312 (60)
Yes 24 (44.4) 208 (40)
Surgical resection
 Pneumonectomy 2 (3.7) 34 (6.5)
 Lobectomy 51 (94.4) 466 (89.6)
 Wedge resection 1 (1.9) 16 (3.1)
Adjuvant treatment
 No 15 (27.8) 283 (54.4)
 Yes 39 (72.2) 237 (45.6)
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 50 (92.6) 314 (60.4)
 >5.0 ng/ml 4 (7.4) 204 (39.2)
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 45 (83.3) 480 (92.3)
 >1.5 ng/ml 9 (16.7) 38 (7.3)
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 36 (66.7) 346 (66.5)
 >3.3 ng/ml 18 (33.3) 172 (33.1)
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 44 (81.5) 407 (78.3)
 >15.2 ng/ml 10 (18.5) 110 (21.2)

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen; Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase.

Supplementary Table 2.

Correlation between ALK expression and the clinicopathological characteristics.

Characteristics n (%) ALK positive ALK negative P*
Age 0.006
 ≤60 336 (58.5) 41 (7.1) 295 (51.4)
 >60 238 (41.5) 13 (2.3) 225 (39.2)
Sex
 Male 267 (46.5) 25 (4.4) 242 (42.2) 0.973
 Female 307 (53.5) 29 (5.1) 278 (48.4)
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 275 (47.9) 17 (3.0) 258 (45.6) 0.008
 Never smoker 291 (50.7) 37 (6.5) 254 (44.9)
Pathological stage
 I 288 (50.2) 27 (4.7) 261 (45.5) 0.353
 II 92 (16) 11 (1.9) 81 (14.1)
 IIIA 178 (31) 13 (2.3) 165 (28.7)
 IIIB 16 (2.8) 3 (0.5) 13 (2.3)
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 348 (60.6) 36 (6.3) 312 (54.4) 0.340
 >3 cm 226 (39.4) 18 (3.1) 208 (36.2)
Regional LN metastasis
 No 342 (59.6) 30 (5.2) 312 (54.4) 0.526
 Yes 232 (40.4) 24 (4.2) 208 (36.2)
Surgical resection
 Pneumonectomy 36 (6.3) 2 (0.4) 34 (6.0) 0.609
 Lobectomy 517 (90.1) 51 (8.9) 466 (81.8)
 Wedge resection 17 (3.0) 1 (0.2) 16 (2.8)
Adjuvant treatment
 No 298 (51.9) 15 (2.6) 283 (49.3) 0.001
 Yes 276 (48.1) 39 (6.8) 237 (41.3)
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 364 (63.4) 50 (8.7) 314 (54.9) 0.001
 >5.0 ng/ml 208 (36.2) 4 (0.7) 204 (35.7)
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 525 (91.5) 45 (7.9) 480 (83.9) 0.018
 >1.5 ng/ml 47 (8.2) 9 (1.6) 38 (6.6)
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 382 (66.6) 36 (6.3) 346 (60.5) 0.985
 >3.3 ng/ml 190 (33.1) 18 (3.1) 172 (30.1)
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 451 (78.6) 44 (7.7) 407 (71.3) 0.636
 >15.2 ng/ml 120 (20.9) 10 (1.8) 110 (19.3)

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen; Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase.

Supplementary Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for ALK expression.

Characteristics HR (95%CI) P*
Age 0.375 (0.190, 0.740) 0.006
Smoking history 0.435 (0.232, 0.813) 0.008

HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.

Supplementary Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of DFS and OS in ALK negative patients.

Variable DFS OS
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
n Median DFS (mo) P* HR (95%CI) P* n Median OS (mo) P* HR (95%CI) P*
Age (years)
 ≤60 295 25.85 0.646 295 31.59 0.694
 >60 225 25.96 225 30.51
Sex
 Male 242 25.69 0.675 242 30.75 0.269
 Female 278 26.09 278 31.45
Smoking history
 Former/current smoker 258 25.41 0.757 258 30.66 0.451
 Never smoker 254 26.21 254 31.30
Pathological stage
 I 261 28.19 0.026 1.450 (1.265, 1.662) 0.001 261 31.75 0.005 0.370
 II 81 25.69 81 30.99
 IIIA 165 22.78 165 30.34
 IIIB 13 20.86 13 29.29
Tumor size
 ≤3 cm 312 26.39 0.006 0.583 312 30.64 0.375
 >3 cm 208 25.17 208 31.84
Regional LN metastasis
 No 312 27.81 0.001 0.292 312 31.46 0.001 2.674 (1.862, 3.842) 0.001
 Yes 208 23.04 208 30.61
Surgical resection
Pneumonectomy 34 23.30 0.029 1.376 (1.070, 1.770) 0.013 34 30.57 0.030 1.482 (1.087, 2.019) 0.013
 Lobectomy 466 25.99 466 30.96
 Wedge resection 16 28.39 16 35.49
Adjuvant treatment
 No 283 25.13 0.761 283 29.21 0.045 0.440 (0.304, 0.637) 0.001
 Yes 237 26.82 237 33.41
CEA
 ≤5.0 ng/ml 314 27.37 0.001 1.367 (1.046, 1.787) 0.022 314 31.46 0.034 0.479
 >5.0 ng/ml 204 23.65 204 30.63
SCCA
 ≤1.5 ng/ml 480 26.15 0.153 480 31.47 0.126
 >1.5 ng/ml 38 22.82 38 26.85
Cyfra21–1
 ≤3.3 ng/ml 346 26.87 0.001 1.421 (1.095, 1.843) 0.008 346 31.85 0.001 1.839 (1.313, 2.575) 0.001
 >3.3 ng/ml 172 23.98 172 29.68
NSE
 ≤15.2 ng/ml 407 25.96 0.205 407 31.05 0.189
 >15.2 ng/ml 110 25.65 110 31.44

LN – lymph node; CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen;Cyfra21-1 – cytokeratin-19 fragments; SCCA – squamous cell carcinoma antigen; NSE – neuron-specific enolase; DFS – disease-free survival; OS – overall survival; HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.

Supplementary Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (A) and OS (B) according to CEA level in all patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (C) and OS (D) according to CEA level in ALK-positive patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (E) and OS (F) according to CEA level in ALK-negative patients.

Supplementary Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (A) and OS (B) according to Cyfra21-1 level in all patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (C) and OS (D) according to Cyfra21-1 level in ALK-positive patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (E) and OS (F) according to Cyfra21-1 level in ALK-negative patients.


Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES