Skip to main content
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice logoLink to Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
letter
. 2016 Jun 17;4(2):277–278. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12378

Problematic Mobile Gaming in Parkinson's Disease: An Impulse Control Disorder for the Smartphone

Nicholas B Galifianakis 1,, Erica A Byrd 1, Jill L Ostrem 1, Caroline M Tanner 1, Caroline A Racine 2
PMCID: PMC6353464  PMID: 30838269

Descriptions of impulse control disorders (ICDs), a well‐known and common complication of Parkinson's disease (PD) medications, have recently expanded to include technology‐associated behaviors like problematic internet use.1, 2 We present a case of problematic mobile gaming (PMG) and outline reasons why this novel ICD behavior is of particular concern for patients with PD.

Case Presentation

A 64‐year‐old woman who had PD for 5 years presented with a chief complaint of right‐sided slowness and leg dragging, which were controlled with relatively high daily doses of levodopa (700 mg) and pramipexole (3 mg). Examination revealed a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of 29 (of a possible 30), asymmetric rigidity, and bradykinesia (an “on‐medication” score of 16 on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part, and Hoehn and Yahr stage 2.0), and dystonic foot inversion that hindered gait. She denied premorbid psychiatric history but described recent anxiety and depression related to the loss of her socially active lifestyle. Significant ICD behaviors included overeating, hours of watching online videos, compulsive baking, and playing piano, all of which interfered with daily activities. She denied gambling and hypersexuality.

Her most problematic ICD behavior was playing a popular game on her mobile devices. She played from 3 to 5 hours daily, missed meals, played while using the restroom, and spent $600/month on within‐app purchases (“boosters” and extra “lives”) in order to continue playing. When not playing, she thought about the game frequently. Playing the game was “an escape,” allowing her to “take her mind off everything” and enjoy satisfaction in the moment.

Management of her ICD included attempting to taper pramipexole, deleting the game, education, and strict monitoring by her family. The problematic game remained deleted from her devices, but she continued to play free mobile games for hours each day. Hobbyism and overeating continued. Unfortunately, her mood later worsened, and she started playing another mobile game, unaware that she had quickly spent $900 playing it until receiving her credit card statement.

Discussion

Problematic mobile gaming likely fits into a larger framework of problematic technology use (e.g., problematic internet use, smartphone addiction). However, PMG and other smartphone overuse warrant particular awareness for clinicians who are treating patients with PD for several reasons. First, mobile devices are becoming ubiquitous. Mobile games are quite literally always at one's fingertips. Second, the mobile technology industry is rapidly advancing, developing exquisitely designed games to maximize use and profit. Stimulating graphics and sounds, along with innovative purchasing models (e.g., “freemium” pricing, subtle “within‐app” purchases), can lead to hours of continuous play and unintentional spending. Finally, patients with PD may be particularly vulnerable to these design features. Those with cognitive impairment may not understand the true cost of playing. In addition, we hypothesize that playing games designed to provide near‐constant reinforcement in the setting of medication‐induced dopamine excess may lead to even more impulsive play.3

Technology overuse lacks the taboo of many ICD behaviors (e.g., gambling, hypersexuality) and thus may not be recognized as pathologic. As technology integrates into all activities of daily life, additional technology‐related ICD behaviors may emerge. Because current screening instruments lack adequate questions about technology use, careful interview‐based screening will be important to detect novel ICDs, especially in patients who have other behavioral symptoms.4

Author Roles

1. Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; 2. Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; 3. Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.

N.B.G.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3A

E.A.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B

J.L.O.: 1A, 3B

C.M.T.: 1A, 3B

C.A.R.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B

Disclosures

Ethical Compliance Statement: We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.

Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no sources of funding and no conflicts of interest.

Financial disclosures for previous 12 months: Nicholas B. Galifianakis is an employee of the University of California‐San Francisco and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center; he has received grant support from the Davis Phinney Foundation, the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the Boston Scientific Corporation. Erica A. Byrd is an employee of the University of California‐San Francisco and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Jill L. Ostrem is an employee of the University of California‐San Francisco and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. She has received grant support from MRI Interventions, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Bachmann Strauss Dystonia and Parkinson's Disease Foundation; she received research support from the Boston Scientific Corporation and St. Jude Medical Corporation; and she has received training grant support from Medtronic Corporation, Merz, Allergan, and the Boston Scientific Corporation. Caroline M. Tanner is an employee of the University of California‐San Francisco and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and is an intermittent employee of the Parkinson's Institute. She serves on the Scientific Advisory Boards of the Michael J. Fox Foundation and the National Spasmodic Dysphonia Association as a voluntary consultant and has provided paid consulting services to Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals, Biotie Therapeutics, and Neurocrine Biosciences; she receives grant support from the Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Parkinson's Disease Foundation, the Department of Defense, and the National Institutes of Health. Caroline A. Racine is an employee of the University of California‐San Francisco; she has received grant support from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Defense and research support from Boston Scientific Corporation.

Relevant disclosures and conflicts of interest are listed at the end of this article.

References

  • 1. Hassan A, Bower JH, Kumar N, Matsumoto JY, Fealey RD, Josephs KA, Ahlskog JE. Dopamine agonist‐triggered pathological behaviors: surveillance in the PD clinic reveals high frequencies. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2011;17:260–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wu K, Politis M, O'Sullivan SS, et al. Problematic internet use in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2014;20:482–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Schull ND. Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas. 1st ed Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Weintraub D, Hoops S, Shea JA, et al. Validation of the questionnaire for impulsive‐compulsive disorders in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2009;24:1461–1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Movement Disorders Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES