Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0210488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210488

Plants used by the rural community of Bananal, Mato Grosso, Brazil: Aspects of popular knowledge

Graciela da Silva Miguéis 1,*, Rosa Helena da Silva 2, Geraldo Alves Damasceno Júnior 2, Germano Guarim-Neto 3
Editor: David A Lightfoot4
PMCID: PMC6353550  PMID: 30699133

Abstract

Studies in rural communities are important to maintain popular knowledge between generations, as well as to identify new species for pharmaceutical production. Thus, the objectives of this study were to determine which plant species the rural community of Bananal, Mato Grosso, Brazil, uses by calculating the levels of fidelity and concordance regarding species uses among residents and to determine if there is a relationship between the number of known useful plants and levels of education, age, and residence time. Ethnobotanical data was collected from residents of the community through semi-structured interviews in January/December/2016. Species diversity was calculated using Shannon-Wiener, Level of Fidelity (LF), Correction Factor, and the Percentage of Agreement regarding the Main Uses (AMU). Statistical tests were performed using generalized linear models (GLM) in the R environment. The plant use indications were grouped according to the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD 10). We found 152 species belonging to 130 genera and 67 families. The most frequently used plant parts were leaves, and decoction was the most frequent preparation mode. Strychnos pseudoquina was the species with the highest amount of use indications. The diversity index was 4.5 nats/ind-1. The body system with the most citations was the code XVIII of ICD 10, corresponding to the species: alfavaca, mentraste, terramicina, angelim, fedegoso. Medicinal species with AMU values higher than 25% were: Strychnos pseudoquina, Plectranthus barbatus, Citrus sinensis cv. pera, Cymbopogon citratus. There was a relationship between the number of useful plants and the residence time of the participants. The Bananal community revealed high species richness and the relationship of knowledge showed that the older the residents and the longer their residence time in the community, the more knowledge they acquired.

Introduction

Ethnobotanical studies have been carried out throughout human history. Such studies started off as qualitative descriptions, but later on focused on quantitative analyses that evaluated levels of fidelity and agreement of use of the species, and now used as statistics with inferencial analyses. Quantitatively, it is possible to demonstrate the importance of different plant characteristics by investigating the knowledge, uses of such plants within a society [1], and practical applications for intercultural comparisons since such method allow for a consensus about knowledge variations [2].

In developed countries, there are less ethnobotanical studies in comparison to developing countries. Some recent works include studies from Italy [3,4], from Iberian Peninsula countries [5] and from France [6]. In the latter, the research focused on plants that are used to produce cosmetics and perfumes. In developing countries, more ethnobotanical research is done, being superior and displaying that plants are still widely used among human populations, and oftentimes are one of the few available resources for disease treatment. Such works, which evaluate traditional knowledge, are frequently published in countries as Kenya [7], Ethiopia [8], Angola [9], Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia [10, 11], among others. Besides these, other studies have been accomplished in distant places that are difficult to access, as an area in the Himalayan mountains [12], a district situated in South-Eastern Bangladesh [13], and an area on the northwestern coast of Egypt [14].

In light of these surveys, ethnobotanical studies are important throughout the world because of communities that use plant resources for subsistencc. Dissemination of such data favors the exchange of knowledge between communities from different places in the world, forming a knowledge network. Currently in Brazil, most of the population still uses medicinal plants to alleviate or even cure certain diseases due to their low cost and/or effective results [1518]. The diversity and availability of native plants favor their use by diverse peoples and communities [18], such as rural (non-traditional) communities, traditional communities, indigenous populations, quilombolas, riverside. The rural communities (focus of the present study) are able to identify many plant species that generate several products, including food, firewood, medicine, fodder and tools for their daily necessities. Thus, ethnobotanical studies help assess how residents in a community mix previous knowledge of their homelands with information from new settlements. Since these people come from various regions of Brazil, they need to adapt and acquire useful plants in their new environments [19].

Such knowledge about useful plants is only orally passed down from one generation to the next [17, 18, 20, 21] and in rural communities is limited to only certain community members, and is gradually decreasing [18]. Many people in rural communities have ample knowledge about these plants, as well as usage methods, practices, and beliefs [18, 22]. Thus, ethnobotanical studies are urgently needed to document current knowledge and provide a baseline for future analysis regarding knowledge and use of native plants [12, 23]. Thus, observing such line of thought, we raise the following hypotheses: rural communities use a wide variety of plant species; there is a consensus among community informants regarding the use fidelity and main use of plant species; there is a proportional relationship between older informants, residence time in the community, and education with more knowledge of the species used.

This study aimed to: (i) determine the plant species used by the rural community of Bananal, Mato Grosso, Brazil, (ii) verify the levels of fidelity and agreement of uses among the local inhabitants, (iii) determine the relationship between the number of known medicinal plants and the levels of education, age, and residence time.

Methodology

Description of the study area, data collection and botanical identification

The study was conducted in a rural area in the Bananal Community, located in the northern region of the city of Rondonópolis, Mato Grosso, Brazil, at the coordinates 16°8’58.68”S and 54°35’10.63”W (Fig 1). The community is made up of the Bananal and Olga Benário settlements that are linked to health care in the Family Health Strategy (FHS) Unit of Bananal. The choice of the place of study was conducted randomly by lottery among the FHS from rural areas.

Fig 1. Geographic location of the study area, Bananal Community, Rondonópolis, MT.

Fig 1

According to Köppen, the local climate is Tropical Aw. The average annual temperature is 27°C, with a maximum of 40°C in September and a minimum of 9°C in July. The highest average rainfall occurs in January, with 320mm, and the lowest in June [24].

The vegetation is divided into regions of gallery forests, savannas, and grasslands, and presents a transition between savanna woodland (Cerradão) and riparian forest. The range of riparian forest vegetation runs parallel to the watercourse and represents the largest part of the remnant native vegetation. The areas of Cerrado present woody vegetation with trees, shrubs, and native herbaceous plants.

Historically, the colonization of the Bananal region began around 1920, with the migration and occupation of landless workers in the Rondonópolis territory [25]. In the Bananal community, the economy presents significant agricultural potential, with prevalent perennial and annual crop cultivation for both consumption and sale. Cattle and pig livestock are raised with emphasis on milk and cheese production and sales, while beef cattle are raised only for local consumption. The region receives services ranging from energy and water supply to bridge and road maintenance.

The community is assisted by programs that provide courses, lectures, and workshops that invest in quality of life and the implementation of family agriculture, such as ponds for fish farming, spring recovery, guidance for field activities, hydroponics implementation, as well as vegetable seeds for families interested in growing vegetable crops [26].

After the determination of the study site, contact was made with the nurse and Community Health Agent (CHA), who are members of the FHS care team. The research was explained and invited to CHA to accompany the researcher in recognizing the area and visiting the homes of people in the rural community, since the residences are far from each other. Follow-up by a local representative helped establish a good relationship between researcher and community residents. They were informed and invited to participate in the survey. Data collection was between January and December 2016, which consisted of semi-structured interviews in the participants' homes.

The following requirements were established for all research interviews: prior consent, availability of participant, all participants were 18 years old or older, participants were residents and registered by the FHS, and family member(s) who had knowledge of useful plants for any purpose. The study excluded residents who were not found after three attempts during the data collection period. The study was carried out with 50 residents from the rural community, the interviews were previously authorized by all the respondents, who signed a Term of Free and Informed Consent, and the CHA as the local representative of Health in the Community, signed an authorization for research on behalf of the entire community.

The species of plants mentioned were defined as sampling units. The species were identified in the field and some collected and photographed for records and subsequent identification without the need of specific organs permissions, because they were on private land and have been authorized by the representative, not involving endangered or protected species. They were collected at several places in the following coordinates: place of collection 1: 16° 8'50.35"S and 54°34'58.64"W; place 2: 16° 8'57.66"S and 54°34'54.21"W; place 3: 16° 8'39.16"S and 54°34'59.71"W; place 4: 16° 7'24.03"S and 54°34'38.04"W; place 5: 16° 7'26.04"S and 54°34'49.02"W; place 6: 16° 7'16.10"S and 54°34'9.38"W; place 7: 16° 7'25.24"S and 54°34'2.24"W; place 8: 16° 7'49.98"S and 54°33'57.06"W.

The collected material was herbarized and identified by consulting specialized literature and botanical experts, as well as through comparison with exsiccates. Of these, the reproductive stages were deposited into the UFMT Herbarium at the Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, MT.

The scientific names of the species were conferred using online databases of the Missouri Botanical Garden/Tropics [27] and the species list from the Flora do Brasil [28]. For taxonomic classification, we used the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV [29]. For geographical origin, we consulted the header of the Species List from the Flora do Brasil [28] and used the following classifications: native, naturalized, cultivated, and exotic.

The empirical classification was used to describe the use category of the cited species. The cited species were grouped into seven categories: medicinal, medicinal and food, food, medicinal and other (used to manufacture soap for general cleaning; used as a flavoring agent), ornamental and mystical, medicinal, food and lumber, and medicinal, ornamental, and mystical.

Plant preparations were classified as follows: decoction (plant part was cooked) as tea, molasses, syrup, and drink with toasted plant, infusion (plant part was put in hot water), ingestion (plant part was used in water or juice, including sap used in coffee, wine, or milk), bottled medicine, and others.

Each plant use indicated by the participants was grouped according to the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD 10), published by the World Health Organization [30].

Statistical analyses

To verify species diversity, we used the Shannon-Wiener index (H’) applied to ethnobotany as described by [31], which is represented by the following formula:

H'=i=1S(pi)(log2pi)

Where: H’ = Shannon-Wiener diversity index using log base e (nats/individual)

S = Number of species

pi = Relative proportion of abundance of species I in relation to the total number of species cited.

Later, the Pielou evenness or uniformity measure was used to measure the distribution pattern in the community [31]. This calculation is expressed by the following formula:

J'=H"H"Max

Where: J’ = Shannon-Wiener function Evenness measure (varies from 0 to 1)

H’ = Shannon-Wiener diversity index

H’ Max = Maximum value of H’

One technique we used to analyze the relative importance of a plant in the community was the consensus among participants. The consensus analysis was based on the concordance between participant responses.For each plant, we also calculated an index called Level of Fidelity (LF) [31,32], expressed by the following equation:

LF=IpIu×100

Where: LF = level of fidelity

Ip = number of informers that mentioned the main use of a particular species.

Iu = number of participants that mentioned the species for any purpose.

The Correction Factor (CF) was estimated to obtain consensus among the informants for each plant. Its value is derived from the number of citations of a certain species, i.e., the number of participants that mentioned each species divided by the number of citations for the most commonly mentioned species, i.e., the number of participants that mentioned the most commonly mentioned species.

Calculating the CF:

CF=Iunumberofinformersthatmentionedthespeciesmorementioned

Then, the percentage of Agreement regarding the Main Uses (AMU) was calculated to neutralize the higher or lower popularity of the species. This calculation is based on the value found in the LF multiplied by the correction factor, expressed in the following formula:

AMU=LF×CF

This analysis can be adapted to any use category, but was initially used in studies on medicinal plants [33]. In this sense, we decided to keep the analysis only to measure the relative importance of plants indicated as medicinal due to the high number of citations for this category.

Statistical models were used to explore how social and cultural variables interact with each other and with the knowledge of plant collection, use and management intensity [2]. We use the methodology described by [2], where the socioeconomic and demographic data were grouped into categorical variables (gender, education) and the continuous variables (age and residence time). For the variables, a generalized linear model with negative binominal distribution was used to see the effect of residence and age and experience of participants in the number of used species. All analyses were performed in R [34].

Ethical aspects

The research project was sent to the Committee of Ethics in Research with Human Beings of the University Hospital Julio Muller (CER / HUJM), Cuiabá / Mato Grosso, in compliance with Resolution 466, of December 12, 2012, of the National Health Council. The CER / HUJM approved all aspects of the research and issued a favorable opinion for the development under the number of CAAE: 48675315.0.0000.5541.

The research in rural community was provided by the Municipal Health Department of Rondonópolis, in Mato Grosso. In the interview, participants were informed about the research and their participation on a voluntary basis, they signed the Informed Consent Form authorizing the participation. In addition, a local representative, resident in the Community, also signed an authorization to conduct the survey on behalf of all, including the collection of some species for botanical identification on their properties, without the need for permissions of specific organs.

Results and discussion

Of the 50 interviewees, 28 were males and 22 were females; age ranged from 34 to 81, with a predominance of 50–59 year-olds. The most frequent level of education (34%) was incomplete elementary school, however, the educacional level of the interviewees varies from literate to higher with postgraduate studies. Family farming and retirement sustain the community. More than half of the interviewees (54%) were from the state of Mato Grosso.

In relation to plants, the participants mentioned 152 species of useful plants, distributed in 130 genera and 67 families (S1 Table). The number of plants we found was higher than other ethnobotanical studies, which registered values between 46 to 72 genera and 33 to 46 families [35, 36]. The present work stands out because of the high number of useful plants, however, this study was only developed in one community, while other studies were carried out in two or more communities [35].

The botanical families with the highest number of useful species were Asteraceae (12), Fabaceae (11), Rutaceae (9), which represented 21% of all species recorded (Fig 2). Such results have commonly been found for these families from ethnobotanical studies in this region [37,38] and in other countries with indigenous peoples and traditional or rural communities [35,36,3944]. This is due to the cosmopolitan distribution of these families, except Antarctica, which are spread across all continents of the world and all Brazilian regions [4547].

Fig 2. Species richness by family from interviews in the Bananal Community, MT, Brazil.

Fig 2

This work evidences the ethnobotanical importance of the native Cerrado plant species and their relationship with the local inhabitants. Empirical knowledge of these species is high considering the number of species, and is capable of generating economic, social, and ecological values for these species. Such species are of fundamental importance for local development as a means of subsistence and immediate relief of health problems in the region, which clearly demonstrates the interaction between community and the environment.

Through the interviews, we obtained 1,070 indications of use for the species reported. These values showed high ethnobotanical knowledge of plants, especially for medicinal plants, in this region. Several studies have been developed aiming to collect information regarding the knowledge of native plants use by different ethnic groups, such as [11,44,48], in more specific groups, such as the [13, 49,50], Quilombolas [51] and in rural communities [2,44]. The results obtained in the present work provide a wealth of knowledge and a surprising number of species citations when compared to the studies mentioned above.

Among the 152 species, the most frequently mentioned were Strychnos pseudoquina A. St.–Hil (Loganiaceae) with 50 citations, followed by Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. Ex (Fabaceae) (47 cit.), Citrus sinensis Osbeck cv. Pera (Rutaceae) and Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. (Lamiaceae) (29 cit.), and Senna occidentalis (Fabaceae) (L.) Link. (23 cit.) (S1 Table).

The species Strychnos pseudoquina (quina) was indicated for treatment of bodily problems, with several purposes including digestive, vermifuge, depurative, appetite stimulant, anemia, diabetes, cough, headache, however the most frequent citation was for problems with the digestive system (S1 Table). We found that such purpose corroborates with a study proving the gastro protective activity of Strychnos pseudoquina [52]. Several studies about S. pseudoquina, with pharmacological, ethnobotanical, and phytochemical approaches have been conducted and indicate anti-inflammatory, anti-herpes and anti-leishmaniasis healing properties [5358].

S. pseudoquina is a native plant with distribution in South America, registered in Bolivia, Paraguay and Brazil [27], and in Brazil it is geographically distributed in the northern, northeastern, midwestern, and southeastern regions [28]. In addition, the species’ ecology favors its propagation, as it is fire tolerant and tends to proliferate in deforestation [59]. As this species is widely distributed in almost all Brazilian regions, including the study site, and is easily spread, it is frequently used and a widely available raw material.

Hymenaea stigonocarpa (jatobá) is distributed in South America in countries such as Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay and Venezuela [27] and is a species relevant to the Bananal community, featuring 47 use citations, including timber, medicinal, treatment for bodily diseases such as pneumonia, flu, bronchitis, cough, anemia, depurative, stomach problems, respiratory problems, anti-inflammatory, cancer treatment, and as a food item (S1 Table). The plants of this genus present bioactive compounds, which confirms the effectiveness of some traditional medicine indications [60]. There are several scientific works that indicate gastroprotective activity, phytochemical and antimicrobial activity, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant action, as well as antidiarrheal and healing properties for duodenal and gastric ulcers [6164]. However, a recent study about the genus Hymenaea spp. tested commercial sap samples and detected adulteration and microbiological contamination, which could be a risk to human health [65]. Thus, we emphasize the importance of the origin of the product.

Regarding the origins of the 152 identified useful species, 73% were native species and 27% were naturalized, cultivated or exotic. However, in relation to use indication, cultivated species stood out because of their availability and ease of collection, as they were often present in backyards or in vessels near homes. Among the cultivated and exotic species found in the community, we cite Curcuma longa L. (acafrão) with European origin, Aloe vera L. Burm.f. (babosa) from Africa, Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf (capim-cidreira) from Asia, Punica granatum L. (romã) from the Mediterranean, and Ocimum basilicum L. (alfavaca) from India (S1 Table).

Species diversity and relative importance

The species diversity was H’ = 4.5 nats individual-1 and species evenness was J’ = 0.9. Such high diversity values were also found in other studies [6668]. Diversity was based on the knowledge regarding plant use of participants and this high value indicates that the interviewees mentioned a significant number of useful species. Overall, this suggests that residents have vast knowledge about plant use, since this diversity index [31] increased with the number of species in the community.

Of the 152 useful plant species recorded, 136 were indicated for medicinal purposes. Of these, the Agreement regarding the Main Uses (AMU) revealed four species with values higher than 25%, representing only 2.9% of the useful species. These species were Strychnos pseudoquina (50%), Plectranthus barbatus Andr. (40%), both mainly used for digestive problems, Citrus sinensis cv. pera (28%), primarily used for the flu, and Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf (26%), primarily used as a calmative (Table 1).

Table 1. Estimation of Level of Fidelity (LF), Correction Factor (FC) and Agreement regarding Main Uses (AMU) for each useful species with medicinal purposes in the Bananal Community, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil.

AMU% values in decreasing order.

Species IP IU Main Use LF CF AMU%
Strychnos pseudoquina 25 50 Digestive 50.00 1.00 50.00
Plectranthus barbatus 20 20 Digestive 100.00 0.40 40.00
Citrus sinensis cv. pera 14 21 Flu 66.67 0.42 28.00
Cymbopogon citratus 13 18 Calmative 72.22 0.36 26.00
Plectranthus amboinicus 12 21 Flu 57.14 0.42 24.00
Terminalia fagifolia 11 16 Stomach problems 68.75 0.32 22.00
Mentha spicata 10 13 Flu 76.92 0.26 20.00
Lippia alba 10 17 Calmative 58.82 0.34 20.00
Mentha pulegium 10 16 Flu 62.50 0.32 20.00
Ocimum basilicum 10 18 Flu 55.56 0.36 20.00
Hymenaea stigonocarpa 10 42 Flu 23.81 0.84 20.00
Palicourea xanthophylla 8 13 Kidney problem 61.54 0.26 16.00
Citrus x limon 8 15 Flu 53.33 0.30 16.00
Vatairea macrocarpa 8 19 Stomach problems 42.11 0.38 16.00
Pterodon emarginatus 7 14 Throat infection 50.00 0.28 14.00
Senna occidentalis 7 23 Flu 30.43 0.46 14.00
Jacaranda rufa 7 11 Depurative 63.64 0.22 14.00
Brosimum gaudichaudii 6 15 Depurative / vitiligo 40.00 0.30 12.00
Dysphania ambrosioides 6 18 Vermifuge 33.33 0.36 12.00
Croton urucurana 5 17 Infection 29.41 0.34 10.00
Alternanthera brasiliana 5 12 Anti-inflammatory 41.67 0.24 10.00
Lafoensia pacari 5 19 Skin disorders 26.32 0.38 10.00
Stryphnodendron adstringens 5 15 Infection 33.33 0.30 10.00
Tabebuia aurea 4 11 Vermifuge 36.36 0.22 8.00
Ruta graveolens 4 17 Headache 23.53 0.34 8.00
Aloe vera 4 22 Burn / câncer treatment 18.18 0.44 8.00
Chiococca alba 3 14 Headache / snake bite 21.43 0.28 6.00
Jatropha elliptica 3 14 Depurative / vermifuge 21.43 0.28 6.00
Momordica charantia 3 11 Stomach problems / câncer treatment 27.27 0.22 6.00

IP = Number of people that mentioned the species for the main use; IU = Number of people that mentioned any species use.

This study highlightsthe species Strychnos pseudoquina, as all participants mentioned that it had at least one use and half of the participants indicated it for the same purpose. This reflects the species’ popularity and the knowledge the community has in relation to its therapeutic actions, with several studies [5258] demonstrating the pharmacological actions of S. pseudoquina.

Additionally, although Plectranthus barbatus was only indicated for digestive problems by participants, a review of the species [69] mentions pharmacological actions, including hypotensive, positive-inotropic actions, cardiovascular, bronchodilator, activation of adelilatocyclase, inhibition of platelet aggregation (anti-metastasis), antitumor, anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive. Another study [70] identified in vitro anti-transpanosomal activity and a brief literature review revealed it has antioxidant, antimicrobial, antifungal, and anti-acetylcholinesterase activities. Furthermore, another study [71] referred to this species’ potential antimalarial action.

A large proportion of species (97.5%) presented low AMU% (below 25%). However, this does not mean these species are irrelevant to the community, which is possibly related to the wide range of indication of species reported by informants, but few useful purposes. Even though the Bananal community expressesed species diversity, their use citations were restricted.

Use categories, lant parts used and reparation mode

According to participant indications, use categories were: medicinal, medicinal and food, food, medicinal and other (soap manufacturing, flavoring), ornamental and mystical, medicinal, food and lumber, and medicinal, ornamental and mystical (S1 Table). Among these, plants with exclusive medicinal use were the most representative, with a total of 68%. Correspondingly, the medicinal category is frequently mentioned in other research articles, reaffirming the diversity and availability of plant resources with medicinal potential [7276]. Therefore, it is clear that the Bananal community has been using plants to treat and cure their illnesses and diseases, as they are predisposed to difficult access to health centers and high costs of allopathic medicine [21,77], as well as their cultural legacy.

Essentially, the population primarily uses medicinal plants, however, such plants may have more than one use purpose. We recorded multipurpose (used for different purposes) plant species as Hymenaea stigonocarpa, which was mentioned as a wood source, food item, and for its medicinal purposes. Thus, 18.4% of the mentioned species had medicinal and food purposes and 9.2% were exclusively used for food industries (S1 Table).

In the present study, food plants use was low. According to [78], food purposes are not very common, which can lead to the abandonment or knowledge loss for these plants in communities. In addition, it is important to motivate rural communities to consume native edible species, which can even help increase family incomes [79]. Another type of use was mystical-religious purposes. Species with such purposes were found in some homes and represented ways of acting and thinking for the community, confirming practices involving beliefs and spirituality. Plants, such as Dieffenbachia seguine (Jacq.) Schot (comigo-ninguém-pode) and Ruta graveolens L. (arruda) were claimed to protect the home and ward off evil, demonstrating the symbolic-mystical-religious of the local people [80].

Regarding plant parts used to prepare medications, the most prominent parts were leaves (37.1%), bark (14.3%) and roots (13.1%) (Fig 3). Such data agrees with other works that recorded 36.4% and 64.5% for leaves, and 23.7% and 7.8% for barks [37, 81].

Fig 3. Plant parts used by the Bananal Community, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil.

Fig 3

Other parts: flower, mesocarp, bud (leaf apex), heartwood, oil, pulp, branch, bud.

The leaves were the most frequently mentioned parts in other studies with 72.5%, 68.2%, 61%, 40%, respectively [82,67,83,84]. This may be due to the fact that leaves are the most abundant and accessible plant parts [81]. From the conservation point of view, the use of leaves is sustainable, since, if the withdrawal of aerial parts is not excessive, will not prevent the development and/or reproduction of the plant [85].

The research participants reported several preparation modes for the species with medicinal purposes. Decoction was the most common preparation mode (36.7%), followed by ingestion (22.4%), infusion (10.7%), and bottling (7.4%) (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Preparation mode of useful plants by the Bananal Community, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil.

Fig 4

Other: topical use (powder, ointment, oil, in natura on the area), eye wash, mouthwash, gargle. Note: Decoction for bath: bath, seat bath, wash wound.

Decoction was also the most frequently used method by people in other communities [35,44,42,86]. How people make homemade extractions with active components is important and should be taken into consideration, since the concentration of active substances increases or decreases depending on the production mode [87].

The popular knowledge in the Bananal community is vast, as the participants reported that harvesting, as well as preparation and measuring, of plant material should be done carefully. They also mentioned combining some herbs to obtain more effective results, as Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde (capim-amargoso) added to Momordica charantia L. (melão-de-são-caetano) to treat renal infections. The practice of combining one or more plant species was expressed in other studies [88,89] and provides synergistic pharmacological actions between plants [84].

Popular recipes depend heavily on the availability of local plants [90]. Knowledge about the plant action, the availability of raw materials, access to the plant, how quickly they can be used, and their immediate side effects, demonstrate the importance of these plants for the health care of the people in a community. Furthermore, participants indicated that we should be careful when using certain medicinal plants, as they can cause adverse reactions. From a scientific point of view, many of the plant species have potentially aggressive substances and should be used with care, respecting their toxicological risks [91], as well as the practice of replacing allopathic medication with plants and concomitant use, since they also present risks to the population [92]. In that case, medicinal plants can aid in a healthy recovery, but should not be used indiscriminately or without knowledge of their therapeutic action.

Therapeutic indications/purpose–ICD 10

Grouping by ICD-10 serves to inform the classification code of diseases and a wide variety of signs, symptoms, abnormal aspects, complaints, social circumstances, and external causes for injury or illnesses. Each state of health receives a bodily category or system, which corresponds to a code represented by roman numerals from I to XXII. This code is often used for classifying diseases. In this study, the classification was performed with the objective of evaluating the most affected diseases and body systems in the community.

The therapeutic indications of the136 medicinal species mentioned by the Bananal community were categorized according to the ICD-10. After organizing this information, we found that plants were indicated for 17 of the 22 bodily systems of ICD-10. The most frequent citation was code XVIII, with 16.8% (Fig 5), referring to the treatment of symptoms, signs, and abnormal findings of clinical examinations and laboratory tests, not classified elsewhere, with the main species: Ocimum basilicum L. (alfavaca), Angeratum conyzoides L. (mentraste), Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) Kuntze (terramicina), Vatairea macrocarpa (Benth.) Ducke (angelim), Senna occidentalis (L.) Link. (fedegoso). Following, code X represented 14.4% of citations and referred to diseases of the respiratory system, with the species: Anadenanthera peregrina (L.) Speg. (angico), Attalea phalerata Mart. ex. Spreng. (bacuri), Senna occidentalis (fedegoso) and Hymenaea stigonocarpa (jatobá). Code I (11.1% of citations) refers to infectious and parasitic diseases, represented by species: Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants (erva-de-santa-maria), Momordica charantia L. (melão-de-são-caetano), Terminalia fagifolia Mart. (mussambé), and Leptolobium dasycarpum Vogel (unha-danta). Code XI (10.7% of citation) is related to diseases of the digestive system (Fig 5), and the species are: Vatairea macrocarpa (angelim), Gymnanthemum amygdalinum (Delile) Sch. Bip. ex Walp. (caferana) and Leptolobium dasycarpum Vogel (unha-danta).

Fig 5. Citation frequency of medicinal plant used to treat bodily systems, classified according to ICD-10, by the participantsof the Bananal Community, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil.

Fig 5

Subtitle: I Infectious and parasitic diseases, II Neoplasms (tumors), III Blood and hematopoietic organ diseases and some immune disorders, IV Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases. V Mental and behavioral disorders, VII Diseases of the eye and attachments, VIII Ear and mastoid disorders, IX Diseases of the circulatory system, X Diseases of the respiratory tract, XI Diseases of the digestive system, XII Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, XIII Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue, XIV Diseases of the genitourinary system, XV Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium, XVIII Symptoms, signs, and abnormal findings of clinical and laboratory exams, not elsewhere classified, XIX Injuries, poisonings and some other consequences of external causes, XX External causes of morbidity and mortality.

The high citation value for code XVIII may be caused by commonly occurring diseases and diseases with unknown causes (Table 2). In places far from medical centers, medicinal plants are the first option for treating the initial signs and symptoms of a disease [93]. The results of this study are important to verify the diseases treated by native plants in this community and are similar to other studies that also point out the presence of the X and XI codes (Fig 5) [88, 94, 83, 67, 87, 95].

Table 2. Diseases treated by Bananal Community classified according to the ICD-10 Code XIII, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil.

Code XVIII Diseases
Baby colic Gangrene Neck pain
Children's flatulence Headache Pain
Cough Headache Pain in the body
Cramp Hemorrhage Swelling
Fever Inflammation Swelling in the feet
Flatulence Jaundice  

Relationship of participant’s knowledge about useful plants

When verifying relationships of community knowledge about useful plants, inferential statistical tests showed that 73.1% of the use indications corresponded to 20 participants and approximately 26.9% of use indications to 30 participants. We infer that the community knowledge about useful plants was concentrated in a few residents of the community.

The number of years that participants resided in the study community was positively associated with the ethnobotany knowledge of plant use, with P value = p ≤ 0.001 (Table 3). A similar result was recorded in two indigenous communities [2], who reported that participants that lived in the study area for many generations possessed the highest knowledge of plant use, in comparation to those who recently moved to the communities.

Table 3. Generalized linear models showing the relationships between useful plant indications with residence time, age, education and the interaction between them.

The type of distribution applied is listed below the name of the respective dependent variable (indication). The first numbers indicate the probability and the numbers in parentheses indicate estimation. Where: indication = number of useful plants mentioned by the participant.

Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) Negative binomial (0)
Intercept 5.39e-06 *** (3.6905167)
Residence time 0.01545 * (-0.0848917)
Education 0.292 (0.129575)
Age 0.31020 (-0.0146152)
Residence time x education 0.735 (-0.001143)
Residence time x Age 0.00828 ** (0.0015042)
Age x Education 0.791 (0.002158)
Observations(n)
50

Codes meaning: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘‘ 1

Significant relationships appeared when the residence time in the community was analyzed individually (Table 3, Fig 6) and in the interaction between time and age (Table 3, Fig 7). In other words, the older the residents were, the more knowledge they had about plants. Likewise, the longer a resident lived in the community, the more knowledge they acquired about plant use.

Fig 6. Generalized linear model of relationship between the dependent variable (use indication) and factor (residence time) in the Bananal community, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil.

Fig 6

2018. Residence time is in (years), solid lines are real function and shaded areas are confidence intervals.

Fig 7. Generalized linear model of relationship between the dependent variable (use indication) and interaction of factors: residence time and age in the Bananal community, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil.

Fig 7

2018. Residence time is in (years), solid lines are real function and shaded areas are confidence intervals.

Although the ages 43 to 55 years old were poorly represented, these variations did not affect our predictions, since more advanced ages (55 to 70 years) reinforced the interaction between residence time and age. Another study found different results, where people of different age categories (juveniles and adults) showed comparable knowledge of medicinal plants [96]. Thus, in the present study the interaction of residence time and age of each participant was an important factor foracquiring knowledge about the useful plants from the local flora. The older the participant and the longer their residence time, the greater their knowledge and indications of useful plants in this community.

Such results support that knowledge is concentrated in the older community members, since they indicated a higher amount of plant uses, and the youngest people had less knowledge of plant uses. Such lack of information may be due to young people’s lack of interest in useful plants species and may be influenced by increased technology. Furthermore, such useful knowledge, that is concentrated with the older members of the community, should be shared with other generations, as it could be lost if not passed on. Corroborating with our findings, [36,97] highlight that modernization and exposure to new drugs have significantly affected traditional practices, and ethnomedicinal knowledge is gradually being lost since older members are the main experts and the younger generation is not interested in learning this practice.

Conclusion

This study significantly contributes to the value, socialization, and record of popular knowledge about useful plants, which was not being documented. This is the first record of popular uses of plant species in the Bananal rural community. This community revealed high species richness, with 152 useful plant species presenting values, including 136 medicinal plants. The Bananal community also presented 1,070 citations, with various use indications to treat health problems. Overall, the community showed high diversity of knowledge about the plant species, with a diversity index of 4.5 nats/ind-1. The preferentially used species were Strychnos pseudoquina and Hymenaea stigonocarpa. Our research showed that the older the participant was and the longer their residence time was, the more knowledge they had about useful plants. Such knowledge is concentrated in older community members. In this sense, encouraging knowledge socialization among the different generations is essential to ensure that beliefs, traditions, and culture are not lost over the years.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Plants used by the residentes in the Bananal Community, Rondonópolis MT.

2018.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), to the course of Powders graduation in Biotechnology and Biodiversity of the Rede Pró-Centro-Oeste, the Foundation of support the Research of the State of Mato Grosso for (FAPEMAT) the offered support, to the Community Agent of Health for his disposition in accompanying the visits for the interviews and to the community's of the Bananal community residents for they share their knowledge.

Data Availability

All relevant data are available from the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/h4uqm/?view_only=92f6bb9ed2c54342b1dcd9f4f6684d7d.

Funding Statement

The research obtained support from the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Mato Grosso (FAPEMAT).

References

  • 1.Byg A, Balslev H. Diversity and use of palms in Zahamena, eastern Madagascar.Biodiversity and Conservation.2001; 10: 951±970. 10.1023/A:1016640713643 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kunwar RM, Fadiman M, Cameron M, Bussmann RW, Thapa-Magar KB, Rimal B, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of plant use knowledge in Baitadi and Darchula districts, Nepal Himalaya. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2018; 14 (40) 10.1186/s13002-018-0242-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guarrera PM, Savo V, Caneva G. Traditional Uses of Plants in the Tolfa–Cerite–Manziate Area (Central Italy). Research Communication Ethenobiology Latters 2015; 6(1):119–16 10.14237/ebl.6.1.2015.288 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Licata M, Tuttolomondo T, Leto C, Virga G, Bonsangue G, Cammalleri I et al. A survey of wild plant species for food use in Sicily (Italy)–results of a 3-year study in four Regional Parks. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.2016; 12 (12) 10.1186/s13002-015-0074-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reyes- García V, Aceituno-Mata L, Calvet-Mir L, Garnatje T, Gomez-Baggethun E, Lastra JJ et al. Resilience of traditional knowledge systems: The case of agricultural knowledge in home gardens of the Iberian Peninsula. Global Environmental Change 2014; 24: 223–231 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jost X, Ansel JL, Lecellier G, Raharivelomanana P, Butaud JF. Ethnobotanical survey of cosmetic plants used in Marquesas Islands (French Polynesia). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2016; 12(55) https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81805112.pdf [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bussmann RW, Paniagua-Zambrana NY, Wood N, Njapit SO, Njapit JNO, Osoi GSE, Kasoe SP. Knowledge Loss and Change Between 2002 and 2017—a Revisit of Plant Use of the Maasai of Sekenani Valley, Maasai Mara, Kenya. Economic Botany 2018. 10.1007/s12231-018-9411-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tuasha N, Petros B, Asfaw Z. Medicinal plants used by traditional healers to treat malignancies and other human ailments in Dalle District, Sidama Zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2018; 14(15) 10.1186/s13002-018-0213-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lautenschläger T, Monizi M, Pedro M, Mandombe JL, Bránquima MF, Heinze C. First large-scale ethnobotanical survey in the province of Uíge, northern Angola. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2018; 14 (51) 10.1186/s13002-018-0238-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pasquini MW,Mendoza JS,Sánchez-Ospina C. Traditional Food Plant Knowledge and Use in Three Afro-Descendant Communities in the Colombian Caribbean Coast: Part I Generational Differences Economic Botany 2018. 10.1007/s12231-018-9422-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cámara-Leret R, Paniagua-Zambrana N, Balslev H, Macia MJ. Ethnobotanical Knowledge Is Vastly Under-Documented in Northwestern South America PLoS ONE 2014; 9(1) http://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weckerle CS, Huber FK, Yongping Y, Weibang S. Plant Knowledge of the Shuhi in the Hengduan Mountains, Southwest China Economic Botany 2006; 60(1): 3–23. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1663/0013-0001%282006%2960%5B3%3APKOTSI%5D2.0.CO%3B2 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Faruque MO, Uddin SB, Barlow JW, Hu S, Dong S, Cai Q et al. Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh Front. Pharmacol. 2018; 9 (40) http://doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bidak LM, Kamala SA, Halmyb MWA, Heneidya SZ. Goods and services provided by native plants in desert ecosystems: Examples from the northwestern coastal desert of Egypt. Global Ecology and Conservation 2015; 3: 433–447 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.02.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Souza MD, Pasa MC. Levantamento etnobotânico de plantas medicinais em uma área rural na região de Rondonópolis, Mato Grosso. Biodiversidade. 2013; 12(1):138±145. http://www.periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/biodiversidade/article/view/1256 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Badke MR, Budó MLD, Silva FM, Ressel LB. Plantas medicinais: o saber sustentado na prática do cotidiano popular.Escola Anna Nery. 2011;14(1):132±139. 10.1590/S1414-81452011000100019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh A, Nautiyal MC, Kunwar RM, Bussmann RW. Ethnomedicinal plants used by local inhabitants of Jakholi block, Rudraprayag district, western Himalaya, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2017; 13(49). 10.1186/s13002-017-0178-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Verma RK. An ethnobotanical study of plants used for the treatment of livestock diseases in Tikamgarh District of Bundelkhand, Central India. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2014; 4(Suppl 1): 460–467. 10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C1067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cunha AS, Bortolotto IM. Etnobotânica de Plantas Medicinais no Assentamento Monjolinho, município de Anastácio, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Acta Bot. Bras. 2011; 25(3):685±98 10.1590/S0102-33062011000300022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oliveira CJde, Araujo TLde. Medicinal plants: uses and beliefs of elderly carriers of arterial hypertension. Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem. 2007; 09(01):93±105.https://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v9/n1/v9n1a07.htm [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pasa MC, Ávila G. Ribeirinhos e recursos vegetais: a etnobotânica em Rondonópolis, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Interações, Campo Grande. 2010; 11(2):195±204. 10.1590/S1518-70122010000200008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kulshrestha P. Ethnobotanical knowledge of rural communities in Gwalior district, Madhya Pradesh, India: Basis for biodiversity conservation. International Journal of Academic Research and Developmen 2018; 3(Special 1):52–54 http://www.academicsjournal.com/archives/2018/vol3/issue1S/3-1-266 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baydoun SA, Kanj D, Raafat K, Aboul Ela M, Chalak L, Arnold-Apostolides N. Ethnobotanical and Economic Importance of Wild Plant Species of Jabal Moussa Bioreserve, Lebanon. J Ecosys Ecograph. 2017; 7(3). 10.4172/2157-7625.1000245 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia—INMET. Ministério da agricultura, pecuária e abastecimento. Disponível em: http://www.inmet.gov.br. Acesso em: 10 jun 2017.
  • 25.Lima LMdeS. O processo de (re)criação do campesinato em áreas do latifúndio: a fragmentação da terra em Rondonópolis. M. Sc. Tese, Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas. 2007. http://doi:10.11606/T.8.2007.tde-101020077-152602
  • 26.Prefeitura Municipal de Rondonópolis. Prefeitura de Rondonópolis/MT apoia pequenos produtores. 2010. Disponível em: https://www.agrolink.com.br/saudeanimal/noticia/prefeitura-de-rondonopolis-mt-apoia-pequenos-produtores_115658.html.Acesso em: 12 ago 17.
  • 27.Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden. Access in: 01 jul 2017. Available in: http://www.tropicos.org
  • 28.Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Jardim botânico do Rio de Janeiro.Disponível em: http://www.floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br. Acesso em: 01 mai 2017.
  • 29.Stevens PF. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.Version 14, July 2017. APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181 (1):1–20, Available in: http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/ [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Worlh Health Organization.International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems ICD-10.WHO; 2016. Access in: 10 may 2017. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm.htm [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Albuquerque UPde, Lucena RFPde. Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobotânica.Recife: Livro rápido/NUPEEA.139–158. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Friedman J, Yaniv Z, Dafni A, Palewitch D. A preliminary classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of an ethnopharmacological field survey among bedouins in the negev desert, Israel. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1986; 16(2):275±287. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03788741/16/2-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Amaral CN, Guarim-Neto G. Os quintais como espaços de conservação e cultivo de alimentos: um estudo na cidade de Rosário Oeste (Mato Grosso, Brasil). Bol. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, Belém, 2008; 3(3):329±341. 10.1590/S1981-81222008000300004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: (2017). http://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Umair M, Altaf M, Abbasi AM. An ethnobotanical survey of indigenous medicinal plants in Hafizabad district, Punjab-Pakistan.PLoS ONE 2017; 12(6):e0177912 10.1371/journal.pone.0177912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aziz MA, Adnan M, Khan AH, Shahat AA, Al-Said MS, Ullah R.Traditional uses of medicinal plants practiced by the indigenous communities at Mohmand Agency, FATA, Pakistan.Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2018; 14 (2) 10.1186/s13002-017-0204-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bieski IGC, Leonti M, Arnason JT, Ferrier J, Rapinski M, Violante IMP et al. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants by population of Valley of Juruena Region, Legal Amazon, Mato Grosso, Brazil.Journal Ethnopharmacology. 2015; 173:383±423. 10.1016/j.jep.2015.07.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Costa CIB, Bonfim GFP, Pasa CM, Monteiro VDA. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal flora in the rural community Rio dos Couros, state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas. 2017:16(1):53±67.http://www.blacpma.usach.cl/sites/blacpma/files/articulo_5_-_1153_-_53_-_67.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Corrigan BM, Van WYK, Geldenhuys CJ, Jardine JM. Ethnobotanical plant uses in the KwaNibela Peninsula, St Lucia, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany. 2011; 77: 346±359. 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.09.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tibiri A, Sawadogo WR, Dao A, Elkington BG, Ouedraogo N, Guissou IP. Indigenous Knowledge of Medicinal Plants Among Dozo Hunters: An Ethnobotanical Survey in Niamberla Village, Burkina Faso.The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2014; 21(5): 294±303. 10.1089/acm.2014.0016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ahmad KS, Hamid A, Nawaz F, Hameed M, Ahmad F, Deng J, et al. Ethnopharmacological studies of indigenous plants in Kel village, Neelum Valley, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.2017; 13(68). 10.1186/s13002-017-0196-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abbas Z, Khan SM, Alam J, Khan SW, Abbasi AM. Medicinal plants used by inhabitants of the Shigar Valley, Baltistan region of Karakorum range-Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2017; 13(53). 10.1186/s13002-017-0172-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lumpert M, Kreft S. Folk use of medicinal plants in Karst and Gorjanci, Slovenia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2017; 13(16). 10.1186/s13002-017-0144-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shaheen H, Qaseem MF, Amjad MS, Bruschi P. Exploration of ethno medicinal knowledge among rural communities of Pearl Valley; Rawalakot, District Poonch Azad Jammu and Kashmir. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(9): 10.1371/journal.pone.0183956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wilson EO. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington: 1988. Available in: https://www.nap.edu/read/989/chapter/1 [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lewis GP, Schrire B, Machinder B, Lock M. Legumes of the World. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 2005http://www.darwininitiative.org.uk/documents/14001/803/14-001%20AR1%20Annex%202%20Kew%20Scientist%20Newsletter.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Andenberg AA, Baldwin BG, Bayer RG, Breitwieser J, Jeffrey C, Dillon MO, et al. Compositae In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C editors. Flowering Plants Eudicots Asterales, VIII. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants.Springer -Verlag; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liporacci HSN, Hanazaki N, Ritter MR, Araújo EL. Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga? Rodriguésia. 2017; 68(4): 1225–1240. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rod/v68n4/2175-7860-rod-68-04-1225.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Premamalini P, Sharmila S. Ethnomedicinal Perspectives of Botanicals Used by the People of Pavalamalai, Gobi, Erode District, Tamil Nadu for Curing Various Ailments. International Journal of Advanced Herbal Science and Technology. 2017; 3(1): 67–75. 10.23953/cloud.ijahst.327 10.23953/cloud.ijahst.327 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Saravanan K, Elumalai S. Ethno Medicinal Uses of Plants Used By Jenu Kuruba Tribes at Rajiv Gandhi National Tiger Reserve Park, Hunsur, Mysore, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Advanced Herbal Science and Technology. 2017; 3(1): 49–66. 10.23953/cloud.ijahst.315 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Conde BE, Ticktin T, Fonseca AS, Macedo AL, Orsi TO, Chedier LM et al. Local ecological knowledge and its relationship with biodiversity conservation among two Quilombola groups living in the Atlantic Rainforest, Brazil. PLoS ONE.2017; 12(11): e0187599. 10.1371/journal.pone.0187599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nicoletti M, Goulart MO, Lima RA, Goulart AE, Delle Monache F, Marini Bettolo GB.Flavonoids and alkaloids from Strychnos pseudoquina. J Nat Prod.1984; 47(6); 953±957. 10.1021/np50036a007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bieski GC, Santos FR, Oliveira RM, Espinosa MM, Macedo M, Albuquerque UP et al. Ethnopharmacology of medicinal plants of the Pantanal Region (Mato Grosso, Brazil). Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2012. 10.1155/2012/272749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jesus NZT, Lima JCS, Silva RM, Espinosa MM, Martins DTO. Levantamento etnobotânico de plantas popularmente utilizadas como antiúlceras e antiinflamatórias pela comunidade de Pirizal, Nossa Senhora do Livramento-MT, Brasil. Rev. Bras farmacogn. 2009; 19(1):130±139. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbfar/v19n1a/23.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sarandy MM, Novaes RD, Xavier AA, Vital CE, Leite JPV, Melo FCSA et al. Hydroethanolic Extract of Strychnos pseudoquina Accelerates Skin Wound Healing by Modulating the Oxidative Status and Microstructural Reorganization of Scar Tissue in Experimental Type I Diabetes.Biomed Res Int. 2017 10.1155/2017/9538351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Boff L, Silva IT, Argenta DF, Farias LM, Alvarenga LF, Pádua RM et al. Strychnos pseudoquina A. St. Hil.: a Brazilian medicinal plant with promising in vitro antiherpes activity.J Appl Microbiol. 2016; 121(6):1519±1529. 10.1111/jam.13279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lage PS, Chávez-Fumagalli MA, Mesquita JT, Mata LM, Fernandes SO, Cardoso VN et al. Antileishmanial activity and evaluation of the mechanism of action of strychnobiflavone flavonoid isolated from Strychnos pseudoquina against Leishmania infantum. Parasitol Res. 2015;114(12):4625±35. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lage PS, Andrade PH, Lopes AS, Fumagalli MAC, Valadares DG, Duarte MC et al. Strychnos pseudoquina and its purified compounds present an effective in vitro antileishmanial activity.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013. 10.1155/2013/304354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pott A, Pott VJ. Plantas do Pantanal. Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Pantanal, Serviço de Produção de Informação. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Boniface PK, Baptista Ferreira S, Roland Kaiser C. Current state of knowledge on the traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology of the genus Hymenaea.Journal Ethnopharmacology. 2017; 12(206): 193±223. 10.1016/j.jep.2017.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Martins JL, Rodrigues OR, Sousa FB, Fajemiroye JO, Galdino PM, Florentino IF et al. Medicinal species with gastroprotective activity found in the Brazilian Cerrado. Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology. 2015; 29(3): 238±51.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25753027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dimech GS, Soares LA, Ferreira MA, Oliveira AG, Carvalho MC, Ximenes EA. Phytochemical and Antibacterial Investigations of the Extracts and Fractions from the Stem Bark of Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. ex Hayne and Effect on Ultrastructure of Staphylococcus aureus Induced by Hydroalcoholic ExtractScientific World Journal. 2013. 10.1155/2013/862763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Orsi PR, Seito LN, Di Stasi LC.Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. exHayne: A tropical medicinal plant with intestinal anti-inflammatory activity in TNBS model of intestinal inflammation in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2014; 151(1):380±5. 10.1016/j.jep.2013.10.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Orsi PR, Bonamin F, Severi JA, Santos RC, Vilegas W, Hiruma-Lima CA et al. Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. ex Hayne: A Brazilian medicinal plant with gastric and duodenal anti-ulcer and antidiarrheal effects in experimental rodent models.Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2012;143(1):81±90. 10.1016/j.jep.2012.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Farias KdeS, Auharek SA, Cunha-Laura AL, Souza JMEde, Damasceno-Junior GA, Toffoli-Kadri MC et al. Adulteration and Contamination of Commercial Sap of Hymenaea Species.Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.2017 10.1155/2017/1919474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Amorozo MCM. Uso e diversidade de plantas medicinais em Santo Antônio do Leverger, MT, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 2002; 16(2):189±203. 10.1590/S0102-33062002000200006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Meyer L, Quadros KE, Zeni ALB. Etnobotânica na comunidade de Santa Bárbara, Ascurra, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Bioci. 2012; 10(3): 258±266.http://www.ufrgs.br/seerbio/ojs/index.php/rbb/article/view/1651 [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ruzza DAC, Göttert V, Rossi AAB, Dardengo JFE. Levantamento etnobotânico no município de Alta Floresta, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Enciclopédia biosfera, Centro Científico Conhecer. 2014; 10(18): 3332±3343. http://www.conhecer.org.br/enciclop/2014a/CIENCIAS%20BIOLOGICAS/levantamento%20etnobotanico.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Costa MCCD. Uso popular e ações farmacológicas de Plectranthus barbatus Andr. (Lamiaceae): revisão dos trabalhos publicados de 1970 a 2003. Rev. Bras. Pl. Med. 2006; 8(2):81±88. www.sbpmed.org.br/download/issn_06/revisao.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Santos RTdos, Hiramoto LL, Lago JHG, Sartorelli P, Tempone AG, Pinto EG et al. Anti-trypanosomal activity of 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β -D-glucose isolated from Plectranthus barbatus Andrews (Lamiaceae). Quim. Nova. 2012; 35(11): 2229±2232. 10.1590/S0100-40422012001100025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kiraithe MN, Nguta JM, Mbaria JM, Kiama SG. Evaluation of the use of Ocimum suave Willd.(Lamiaceae), Plectranthus barbatus Andrews (Lamiaceae) and Zanthoxylum chalybeum Engl. (Rutaceae) as antimalarial remedies in Kenyan folk medicine.Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2016;178:266±271. 10.1016/j.jep.2015.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rossato SC, Leitão-Filho HGF, Begossi A. Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest coast (Brazil). Economic Botany. 1999; 53(4): 387±395.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02866716 [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Murad W, Azizullah A, Muhammad A, Tariq A, Khan KU, Waheed A et al. Ethnobotanical assessment of plant resources of Banda Daud Shah, District Karak, Pakistan.Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.2013; 9(77). 10.1186/1746-4269-9-77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Moura BPF, Marques WJG. Conhecimento de pescadores tradicionais sobre a dinâmica espaço-temporal de recursos naturais na Chapada Diamantina, Bahia. BiotaNeotropica. 2007; 7(3):119±123. http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v7n3/pt/fullpaper?bn01807032007+pt [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Megersa M, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E, Beyene A, Woldeab B. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Wayu Tuka District, East Welega Zone of Oromia Regional State, West Ethiopia.Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.2013; 9(68). 10.1186/1746-4269-9-68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rankoana SA, Shilubane PX, Potgieter MJ. The medical ethnobotanical knowledge of the Tsonga-Shangana in Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga, South Africa.African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance (AJPHERD). 2015; Supplement 1(4): 773±787.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316855505 [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Messias MCTB, Menegatto MF, Prado ACC, Santos BR, Guimarães MFM. Popular use of medicinal plants and the socioeconomic profile of the users: a study in the urban area of Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.Rev. Bras. Pl. Med. 2015; 17(1): 76±104. 10.1590/1983-084X/12_139 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bortolotto IM, Amorozo MCdeM, Guarim Neto G, Oldeland J, Damasceno-Junior GA. Knowledge and use of wild edible plants in rural communities along Paraguay River, Pantanal, Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2015; 11 (46): 10.1186/s13002-015-0026-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bortolotto IM, Hiane PA, Ishii IH, Souza PRde, Campos RP, Gomes RJB et al. A knowledge network to promote the use and valorization of wildfood plants in the Pantanal and Cerrado, Brazil. Reg Environ Change. 2017; 17:1329±1341. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10113-016-1088-y [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Maciel MRA, Guarim-Neto G. Um olhar sobre as benzedeiras de Juruena (Mato Grosso, Brasil) e as plantas usadas para benzer e curar. Bol. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas, Belém 2006; 1(3): 61±77. 10.1590/S1981-81222006000300003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chahad AM, Michalet S, Bechir AB, Tidjani A, Nkongmeneck BA, Dijoux-Franca MG. Medicinal Plants from the Ouadda1¨ Province (Chad): An Ethnobotanical Survey of Plants Used in Traditional Medicine. The journal of alternative and complementary medicine.2015; 21(9): 569±577. 10.1089/acm.2014.0243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Silva JS, Guarim-Neto G. O uso de recursos vegetais com fins medicinais por moradores de bairros da zona oeste de Cuiabá –MT, Brasil. Revista de Ciências Agro-Ambientais. 2012; 10(1): 9±22.http://www.unemat.br/revistas/rcaa/docs/vol10/ARTIGO_2_RCAA_v10n1a2012.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Neto FRG, Almeida GSSA, Jesus NG, Fonseca MR. Estudo Etnobotânico de plantas medicinais utilizadas pela Comunidade do Sisal no município de Catu, Bahia, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Plantas Med. 2014; 16(4):856±865. 10.1590/1983-084X/11_207 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.González JÁ, García-Barriuso M, Amichb F.Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants traditionally used in the Arribesdel Duero, western Spain. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2010; 131(2):343±355. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378874110004848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ramos UF, Soledade SC, Baptista ER. Utilização de plantas medicinais pela comunidade atendida no programa saúde da família de Pirajá, Belém, PA. Infarma. 2011; 24(5/6):10–18. http://revistas.cff.org.br/infarma/article/view/373 [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Vieira LS, Sousa RS, Lemos JR. Plantas medicinais conhecidas por especialistas locais de uma comunidade rural maranhense. Rev. Bras. Pl. Med. 2015; 17(4):supl. III, 1061±1068. 10.1590/1983-084x/15_009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Saraiva ME, Ulisses AVRA, Ribeiro DA, Oliveira LGS, Macêdo DG, Sousa FFS et al. Plant species as a therapeutic resource in areas of the savanna in the state of Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2015;171:141±153. 10.1016/j.jep.2015.05.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Monteles R, Pinheiro CUB. Plantas medicinais em um quilombo maranhense: uma perspectiva etnobotânica. Revista de Biologia e Ciências da Terra. 2007: 7(2).http://www.redalyc.org/html/500/50007205/ [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mbunde MVN, Innocent E, Mabiki F, Andersson PG. Ethnobotanical survey and toxicity evaluation of medicinal plants used for fungal remedy in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. J IntercultEthnopharmacol. 2017; 6(1): 84–96https://dx.doi.org/10.5455%2Fjice.20161222103956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Egea T, Signorini MA, Bruschi P, Rivera D, Obón C, Alcaraz F et al. Spirits and liqueurs in European traditional medicine: Their history and ethnobotany in Tuscany and Bologna (Italy). Journal of Ethnopharmacology.2015; 175: 241±255. 10.1016/j.jep.2015.08.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Veiga Junior VF, Pinto AC, Maciel MMM. Plantas medicinais: cura segura? Quim. Nova, 2005; 28 (3): 519±528. 10.1590/S0100-40422005000300026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Veiga Junior VF. Study of the medicinal plants consumption in the Middle-North Region of the Rio de Janeiro State: acceptance by health professionals, was of use of the population. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy. 2008; 18(2): 308±313. 10.1590/S0102-695X2008000200027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Freitas AVL, Azevedo RAB, Pereira YB, Freitas Neto EC, Coelho MFB. Uses of medicinal plants in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Journal of Global Biosciences.2014; 3(4):749±762. http://www.mutagens.co.in/jgb/vol.03/4/08.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Liporacci HSN, Simão DG. Levantamento etnobotânico de plantas medicinais nos quintais do Bairro Novo Horizonte, Ituiutaba, MG. Rev. Bras. Pl. Med. 2013; 15(4): 529±540. 10.1590/S1516-05722013000400009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ribeiro RV, Bieski IGC, Sikiru BO, Martins DTO. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by Ribeirinhos in the North Araguaia microregion, Mato Grosso, Brazil.Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2017; 205:69±102. 10.1016/j.jep.2017.04.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Randrianarivony TN, Ramarosandratana AV, Andriamihajarivo TH, Rakotoarivony F, Jeannoda VH, Randrianasolo A et al. The most used medicinal plants by communities in Mahaboboka, Amboronabo, Mikoboka, Southwestern Madagascar. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2017; 13(19): 10.1186/s13002-017-0147-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Aziz MA, Adnam M, K AH, Rehman AU, Jan R, Khan J. Ethno-medicinal survey of important plants practiced by indigenous community at Ladha subdivision, South Waziristan agency, Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2016; 12:53. 10.1186/s13002-016-0126-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Plants used by the residentes in the Bananal Community, Rondonópolis MT.

2018.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are available from the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/h4uqm/?view_only=92f6bb9ed2c54342b1dcd9f4f6684d7d.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES