Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2019 Jan 30;10:588. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08563-w

Author Correction: Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care

Lena Maier-Hein 1,✉,#, Matthias Eisenmann 1,#, Annika Reinke 1, Sinan Onogur 1, Marko Stankovic 1, Patrick Scholz 1, Tal Arbel 2, Hrvoje Bogunovic 3, Andrew P Bradley 4, Aaron Carass 5, Carolin Feldmann 1, Alejandro F Frangi 6, Peter M Full 1, Bram van Ginneken 7, Allan Hanbury 8,9, Katrin Honauer 10, Michal Kozubek 11, Bennett A Landman 12, Keno März 1, Oskar Maier 13, Klaus Maier-Hein 14, Bjoern H Menze 15, Henning Müller 16, Peter F Neher 14, Wiro Niessen 17, Nasir Rajpoot 18, Gregory C Sharp 19, Korsuk Sirinukunwattana 20, Stefanie Speidel 21, Christian Stock 22, Danail Stoyanov 23, Abdel Aziz Taha 24, Fons van der Sommen 25, Ching-Wei Wang 26, Marc-André Weber 27, Guoyan Zheng 28, Pierre Jannin 29,#, Annette Kopp-Schneider 30,#
PMCID: PMC6353893  PMID: 30700735

Correction to: Nature Communications; 10.1038/s41467-018-07619-7; published online 06 December 2018

In the original version of this Article the values in the rightmost column of Table 1 were inadvertently shifted relative to the other columns. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article. The incorrect version of Table 1 is reproduced below for comparison.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES