Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2019 Jan 29;63(2):e01610-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01610-18

Microsatellite Typing and Resistance Mechanism Analysis of Voriconazole-Resistant Aspergillus flavus Isolates in South Korean Hospitals

Min Ji Choi a,#, Eun Jeong Won b,#, Min Young Joo a, Yeon-Joon Park c, Soo Hyun Kim a, Myung Geun Shin a, Jong Hee Shin a,
PMCID: PMC6355573  PMID: 30397064

A recent surveillance study in South Korea revealed that 14% (7/50) of Aspergillus flavus clinical isolates had a voriconazole minimum inhibitory concentration of ≥4 μg/ml. Of seven non-wild-type (non-WT) isolates, six ear isolates from four hospitals shared the same microsatellite genotype.

KEYWORDS: Aspergillus flavus, azole resistance mechanism, gene expression

ABSTRACT

A recent surveillance study in South Korea revealed that 14% (7/50) of Aspergillus flavus clinical isolates had a voriconazole minimum inhibitory concentration of ≥4 μg/ml. Of seven non-wild-type (non-WT) isolates, six ear isolates from four hospitals shared the same microsatellite genotype. None of the non-WT isolates showed cyp51 mutations associated with azole resistance. However, the mean expression levels of efflux pump (MDR2, atrF, and mfs1) and target (cyp51A) genes exhibited significant differences between non-WT and other isolates.

INTRODUCTION

The survival rates of immunocompromised patients with invasive aspergillosis have improved as a result of many factors, one of which is the availability of azole antifungal drugs (1). Voriconazole is one of the preferred agents for first-line treatment (2); thus, the emergence of voriconazole-resistant Aspergillus isolates has impacted the management of aspergillosis. Most invasive aspergillosis cases are caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, isolates of which are frequently resistant to voriconazole (35). A. flavus is the second leading cause of aspergillosis (6, 7). A. flavus is usually susceptible to azole antifungals (8); the prevalence of voriconazole-resistant A. flavus isolates is 0% to 4.9% (810) based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute epidemiological cutoff value (ECV, 2 μg/ml) (11). A recent surveillance study in South Korea indicated that 14% of A. flavus isolates had voriconazole MICs above the ECV. In this study, we investigated the genetic relationship and resistance mechanisms of these voriconazole non-wild-type (non-WT) isolates of A. flavus.

A total of 50 A. flavus isolates (28 respiratory tract, 16 ear discharge, and 6 other isolates) obtained from 10 university hospitals from February 2012 through August 2013 were analyzed. All isolates were identified by partial sequencing of the β-tubulin and calmodulin genes (12). The MICs of antifungal agents were determined by the CLSI M38-A2 method (13). To evaluate inter- and intrahospital spread in the university hospitals in South Korea, the isolates were genotyped by microsatellite typing (14). The target genes (cyp51A, cyp51B, and cyp51C) and their promoter regions were sequenced (15, 16). The expression levels of target genes (cyp51A, cyp51B, and cyp51C) and genes encoding efflux pumps (MDR1, MDR2, MDR4, atrF, and mfs1) were quantified by real-time PCR (17).

Based on the CLSI ECVs (11), the rates of non-WT isolates to voriconazole (>2 μg/ml), posaconazole (>0.5 μg/ml), and itraconazole (>1 μg/ml) were 14.0% (7/50), 0.0% (0/50), and 6.0% (3/50), respectively. Intrinsic amphotericin B resistance has been recognized in Aspergillus terreus isolates for many decades, and A. flavus isolates have been known to have reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B (18). In a recent study from Brazil, 87% of A. flavus isolates had an amphotericin B MIC of ≥2 μg/ml (19), whereas we showed that 30% (15/50) had an amphotericin B MIC of ≥2 μg/ml.

Table 1 summarizes the data for seven voriconazole non-WT isolates of A. flavus. Microsatellite typing showed that the six non-WT isolates (E1 to E6) obtained from the ear specimens of six patients with otitis media at four hospitals shared the same microsatellite genotype (type 1); however, one respiratory isolate (R1) from a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was unique (type 2). Likewise, in two recent studies, none of seven non-WT isolates had missense mutations in cyp51A or cyp51B or alterations in their promoters (20, 21). However, all harbored the same nonsynonymous mutations (M54T/S240A/D254G/N423D) in cyp51C. The seven patients from whom non-WT isolates were obtained in this study had not received azole therapy, suggesting that most azole resistance in A. flavus isolates from South Korean hospitals were environmentally acquired, as seen for A. fumigatus isolates (1).

TABLE 1.

Antifungal susceptibilities, molecular characteristics, and clinical information of seven voriconazole non-wild-type isolates of A. flavus

Isolate no. Source Yr of isolation Hospital Antifungal MIC (μg/ml)a of:
Amino acid substitutions in 3 target genes and alteration of promoter regionsc
Patient information
VOR AMB ITRA POSA Microsatellite typeb cyp51A cyp51B cyp51C Age (yrs)/sex Underlying disease(s)d Previous antifungal exposure
E1 Ear 2013 A 8 4 2 0.5 1 None None M54T, S240A, D254G, N423D 45/F OM No
E2 Ear 2013 B 8 1 1 0.5 1 None None M54T, S240A, D254G, N423D 54/F OM No
E3 Ear 2013 C 8 2 2 0.5 1 None None M54T, S240A, D254G, N423D 30/F Cholesteatoma No
E4 Ear 2012 A 4 0.5 2 0.5 1 None None M54T, S240A, D254G, N423D 57/M OM No
E5 Ear 2013 A 4 1 1 0.25 1 None None M54T, S240A, D254G, N423D 79/F DM, OM No
E6 Ear 2013 D 4 1 0.5 0.25 1 None None M54T, S240A, D254G, N423D 54/F OM No
R1 Respiratory 2012 A 4 1 1 0.25 2 None None T34A, M54T, S240A, D254G, N423D 79/M COPD No
a

Determined by CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method. VOR, voriconazole; AMB, amphotericin B; ITRA, itraconazole; POSA, posaconazole.

b

By microsatellite typing, each strain was characterized by using the sizes of the amplified products of nine markers (2A-2B-2C-3A-3B-3C-4A-4B-4C) (14). Type 1 (126-132-146-147-141-156-112-116-152) was shared by 6 ear isolates (E1 to E6), and the one respiratory isolate (R1) was of type 2 (168-122-130-132-171-147-120-136-128).

c

Amino acid substitutions in the three cyp51 genes and alteration of promoter regions were evaluated by sequencing.

d

OM, otitis media; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with cor pulmonale.

The microsatellite typing performed in this study, with a panel of nine markers (14), enabled discrimination of all 49 A. flavus isolates tested (Fig. 1). All 49 of the A. flavus isolates exhibited high genetic diversity, yielding 39 distinct genotypes, which reflect the diversity of airborne A. flavus conidia in the hospitals. However, six non-WT isolates from ear cultures were genetically distant from other isolates and clustered into one clonal type (type 1) harboring the same cyp51C mutations (M54T/S240A/D254G/N423D), suggesting the existence of clonal non-WT isolates of A. flavus. However, the cyp51C mutations (M54T/S240A/D254G/N423D) found in all seven of the non-WT isolates were also found in 28.6% (12/42) of the WT isolates.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Microsatellite typing dendrogram of 49 A. flavus isolates: 15 ear isolates (E1 to E15), 29 respiratory isolates (R1 to R29), and 2 eye discharge (O1, O2), 2 pus (O3, O4), and 1 peritoneal fluid (O5) isolates. By microsatellite typing, 15 isolates shared five genotypes (types 1, 15, 16, 29, and 38) (asterisk), suggesting clonal isolates. The dendrogram is based on a categorical analysis of nine microsatellite markers in combination with unweighted paired-group methodology using arithmetic average (UPGMA) clustering.

Azole resistance mechanisms in clinical A. fumigatus isolates have been investigated extensively, and the main mechanism is the presence of point mutations in the target gene cyp51A (4, 5, 22, 23). In contrast to A. fumigatus, the resistance mechanisms of A. flavus have been examined in a limited number of clinical strains (15, 20, 21, 24). Liu et al. (25) suggested that a T788G (S240A) missense mutation in cyp51C conferred voriconazole resistance on A. flavus isolates. However, in this study, S240A in cyp51C was present in all 49 A. flavus isolates irrespective of their voriconazole susceptibility, in agreement with previous reports (15, 20, 21), which indicates that the S240A mutation seldom contributes to the acquisition of voriconazole resistance in A. flavus isolates. A homology model of non-WT isolates suggested that S196F and N423D missense mutations in cyp51C exhibited major structural and functional effects on cyp51C drug binding (20). In our study, the N423D mutation in cyp51C was also found in 7 non-WT and 15 WT isolates. Overall, our data suggest that mutations resulting in drug target modification may not be important for voriconazole resistance in A. flavus isolates from South Korean hospitals.

To date, three studies investigated the overexpression of target or efflux pump genes in clinical isolates of A. flavus (20, 21, 24). In a study, four of five voriconazole non-WT isolates had cyp51A and MDR1 overexpression (24), while in the other study, one of three non-WT isolates exhibited overexpression of target genes (cyp51A, cyp51B, and cyp51C) and efflux pump genes (MDR1, MDR2, atrF, and mfs1) (20). In a study by Paul et al. (21), two non-WT isolates showed voriconazole-induced overexpression of Cdr1, suggesting a possible role of multidrug efflux pumps. In our study, we analyzed 34 clinical isolates, including 7 non-WT and 27 WT isolates. Of the eight genes tested, the mean expression levels of four exhibited significant differences between non-WT and WT isolates (non-WT versus WT isolates: cyp51A, 2.529 versus 1.789; MDR2, 0.7429 versus 1.037; atrF, 1.129 versus 0.8963; and mfs1, 3.757 versus 2.670, respectively; all P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Although we did not test Cdr1 overexpression, our results show that overexpression of efflux pump or target genes may explain the high voriconazole MICs of clinical A. flavus isolates from South Korean hospitals, rather than cyp51 mutation.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Relative expression levels of three target genes (cyp51A, cyp51B, and cyp51C) and drug-efflux-associated genes (MDR1, MDR2, MDR4, artF, and mfs1) in 7 voriconazole non-WT and 27 WT isolates relative to that of a control strain, which was susceptible to all three azoles (set to 1.0). The seven non-WT isolates had higher mean expression levels of cyp51A (2.529 versus 1.789), atrF (1.129 versus 0.8963), and mfs1 (3.757 versus 2.670) than the 27 WT isolates (P = 0.042, 0.0316, and 0.0112, respectively) but a lower expression level of MDR2 (0.7429 versus 1.037; P = 0.0278). The differences in the mean expression levels of cyp51B, cyp51C, MDR1, and MDR4 between non-WT and WT isolates were not statistically significant.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1A2B4008181; NRF- 2016R1C1B1009746).

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Verweij PE, Chowdhary A, Melchers WJ, Meis JF. 2016. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: can we retain the clinical use of mold-active antifungal azoles? Clin Infect Dis 62:362–368. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan-Akdagli S, Denning DW, Groll AH, Lagrou K, Lass-Flörl C, Lewis RE, Munoz P, Verweij PE, Warris A, Ader F, Akova M, Arendrup MC, Barnes RA, Beigelman-Aubry C, Blot S, Bouza E, Brüggemann RJM, Buchheidt D, Cadranel J, Castagnola E, Chakrabarti A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Dimopoulos G, Fortun J, Gangneux JP, Garbino J, Heinz WJ, Herbrecht R, Heussel CP, Kibbler CC, Klimko N, Kullberg BJ, Lange C, Lehrnbecher T, Löffler J, Lortholary O, Maertens J, Marchetti O, Meis JF, Pagano L, Ribaud P, Richardson M, Roilides E, Ruhnke M, Sanguinetti M, Sheppard DC, Sinkó J, Skiada A, Vehreschild MJGT, Viscoli C, Cornely OA. 2018. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:e1–e38. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Seyedmousavi S, Mouton JW, Melchers WJG, Bruggemann RJM, Verweij PE. 2014. The role of azoles in the management of azole-resistant aspergillosis: from the bench to the bedside. Drug Resist Updat 17:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Randhawa HS, Gaur SN, Klaassen CH, Meis JF. 2012. Isolation of multiple-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR/L98H mutations in the cyp51A gene in India. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:362–366. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Kathuria S, Hagen F, Meis JF. 2014. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus with the environmental TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation in India. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:555–557. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morgan J, Wannemuehler KA, Marr KA, Hadley S, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ, Fridkin SK, Pappas PG, Warnock DW. 2005. Incidence of invasive aspergillosis following hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation: interim results of a prospective multicenter surveillance program. Med Mycol 43:S49–S58. doi: 10.1080/13693780400020113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hedayati MT, Pasqualotto AC, Warn PA, Bowyer P, Denning DW. 2007. Aspergillus flavus: human pathogen, allergen and mycotoxin producer. Microbiology 153:1677–1692. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/007641-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rudramurthy SM, Chakrabarti A, Geertsen E, Mouton JW, Meis JF. 2011. In vitro activity of isavuconazole against 208 Aspergillus flavus isolates in comparison with 7 other antifungal agents: assessment according to the methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 71:370–377. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Messer SA, Jones RN. 2015. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of isolates of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. from China to nine systemically active antifungal agents: data from the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program, 2010 through 2012. Mycoses 58:209–214. doi: 10.1111/myc.12299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shivaprakash MR, Geertsen E, Chakrabarti A, Mouton JW, Meis JF. 2011. In vitro susceptibility of 188 clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus flavus for the new triazole isavuconazole and seven other antifungal drugs. Mycoses 54:e583–e589. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Espinel-Ingroff A, Turnidge J. 2016. The role of epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) in antifungal susceptibility testing and interpretation for uncommon yeasts and moulds. Rev Iberoam Micol 33:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heo MS, Shin JH, Choi MJ, Park YJ, Lee HS, Koo SH, Lee WG, Kim SH, Shin MG, Suh SP, Ryang DW. 2015. Molecular identification and amphotericin B susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Aspergillus from 11 hospitals in Korea. Ann Lab Med 35:602–610. doi: 10.3343/alm.2015.35.6.602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard—2nd ed CLSI document M38-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rudramurthy SM, de Valk HA, Chakrabarti A, Meis JF, Klaassen CH. 2011. High resolution genotyping of clinical Aspergillus flavus isolates from India using microsatellites. PLoS One 6:e16086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Paul RA, Rudramurthy SM, Meis JF, Mouton JW, Chakrabarti A. 2015. A novel Y319H substitution in CYP51C associated with azole resistance in Aspergillus flavus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6615–6619. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00637-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Toyotome T, Hagiwara D, Watanabe A, Kamei K. 2018. A simple method to detect the tandem repeat of the cyp51A promoter in azole-resistant strains of Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Natesan SK, Lamichchane AK, Swaminathan S, Wu W. 2013. Differential expression of ATP-binding cassette and/or major facilitator superfamily class efflux pumps contributes to voriconazole resistance in Aspergillus flavus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 76:458–463. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Arendrup MC. 2014. Update on antifungal resistance in Aspergillus and Candida. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(Suppl 6):42–48. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reichert-Lima F, Lyra L, Pontes L, Moretti ML, Pham CD, Lockhart SR, Schreiber AZ. 2018. Surveillance for azoles resistance in Aspergillus spp. highlights a high number of amphotericin B-resistant isolates. Mycoses 61:360–365. doi: 10.1111/myc.12759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sharma C, Kumar R, Kumar N, Masih A, Gupta D, Chowdhary A. 2018. Investigation of multiple resistance mechanisms in voriconazole-resistant Aspergillus flavus clinical isolates from a chest hospital surveillance in Delhi, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01928-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01928-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paul RA, Rudramurthy SM, Dhaliwal M, Singh P, Ghosh AK, Kaur H, Varma S, Agarwal R, Chakrabarti A. 2018. Magnitude of voriconazole resistance in clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus flavus and investigation into the role of multidrug efflux pumps. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01022-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01022-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leonardelli F, Macedo D, Dudiuk C, Cabeza MS, Gamarra S, Garcia-Effron G. 2016. Aspergillus fumigatus intrinsic fluconazole resistance is due to the naturally occurring T301I substitution in Cyp51Ap. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5420–5426. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00905-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mellado E, Garcia-Effron G, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2007. A new Aspergillus fumigatus resistance mechanism conferring in vitro cross-resistance to azole antifungals involves a combination of cyp51A alterations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1897–1904. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01092-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fattahi A, Zaini F, Kordbacheh P, Rezaie S, Safara M, Fateh R, Farahyar S, Kanani A, Heidari M. 2015. Evaluation of mRNA expression levels of cyp51A and mdr1, candidate genes for voriconazole resistance in Aspergillus flavus. Jundishapur J Microbiol 8:e26990. doi: 10.5812/jjm.26990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu W, Sun Y, Chen W, Liu W, Wan Z, Bu D, Li R. 2012. The T788G mutation in the cyp51C gene confers voriconazole resistance in Aspergillus flavus causing aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2598–2603. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05477-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES