Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2019 Jan 14;22:1018–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.01.018

Bioenergy production data from anaerobic digestion of thermally hydrolyzed organic fraction of municipal solid waste

AS Razavi a, E Hosseini Koupaie a, A Azizi a, H Hafez b, E Elbeshbishy a,
PMCID: PMC6355964  PMID: 30740487

Abstract

The presented dataset in this data article provides quantitative data on the production of bioenergy (biogas and biomethane) from mesophilic batch anaerobic digestion (AD) of thermally hydrolyzed organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). The discussion and interpretation of the data are provided in another publication entitled “Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Source Separated Organics for Enhanced Solubilization and Biomethane Recovery” (Razavi et al., 2019). The data and information presented in the current data article include (1) the ratio of soluble to particulate chemical oxygen demand (COD) under different thermal hydrolysis condition, (2) the daily measured biogas and biomethane data, (3) the cumulative methane yield data in terms of mL CH4 produced per gram of volatile suspended solids (VSS) as well as feedstock added, (4) the ultimate methane yield data as well as the relative improvement in methane recovery compared to the control (non-hydrolyzed) digester, (5) the data of first-order organics biodegradation rate constants, (6) the procedure of measuring biogas composition via gas chromatography, (7) the procedure of converting the biogas/methane volume data acquired under the actual experimental condition (mesophilic temperature of 38 °C and atmospheric pressure) to the standard temperature (0 °C) and pressure (1 atm) condition, and (8) the procedure of determining the first-order kinetic rate constants.


Specifications table

Subject area Environmental engineering
More specific subject area Anaerobic digestion, biological treatment, thermal hydrolysis, waste minimization, bioenergy
Type of data Table, figures
How data were acquired The gas chromatography was employed to determine the methane content of the produced biogas. A Hach spectrophotometer (model DR3900) was used the analysis the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the samples calorimetrically. The volume of the produced biogas was measured manually with a Poulten & Graf Fortuna™ air-sealed glass syringe (capacity of 100 m) throughout the biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay. To analyze the soluble COD (SCOD), the samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 rpm using a Sorvall Legend XT centrifuge (Fisher Scientific, US). Then, the liquid fraction (supernatant) of the centrifuged samples was passed through 0.45 µm microfiber filters. The analysis including the analysis of ANOVA and the interactions analysis was done using Minitab Software 17.
Data format Raw, analyzed
Experimental factors Thermal hydrolysis parameters include temperature (°C), holding time (min), pressure (kPa), and severity index (–). All the digesters were operated at the mesophilic temperature of 38 °C.
Experimental features Thermal hydrolysis experiments were conducted under wide ranges of temperature, retention time, and pressure so that it covers the severity index range of 3–5 commonly used in industrial applications. Fifteen different thermal hydrolysis conditions were applied to the OFMSW samples. The thermal hydrolysis temperature, pressure, and holding time ranged from 150 to 240 °C, 476 to 3367 kPa, and 5 to 30 min, respectively. The BMP test was performed using raw (non-pretreated) and thermally hydrolyzed OFMSW samples. The BMP assay as well as the sample analyses were performed in triplicates.
Data source location Toronto, Canada
Data accessibility Data are presented in this article
Related research article A.S. Razavi, E. Hosseini Koupaie, A. Azizi, H. Hafez, E. Elbeshbishy, Hydrothermal pretreatment of source separated organics for enhanced solubilization and biomethane recovery, Bioresour. Technol. [1]

Value of the data

  • The data explain the procedure for converting the gas volume data obtained under specific experimental conditions (e.g., specific temperature and/or pressure) into the values under a standard condition (e.g. 0 °C, 1 atm).

  • Data standardization provide the opportunity to compare the data acquired under different experimental conditions.

  • The dataset covering a wide range of thermal hydrolysis conditions might be used as a benchmark to validate the findings of other studies.

  • The data highlight the importance of selecting the optimum ranges of temperature, pressure, and retention time for thermal hydrolysis of OFMSW prior to the AD process.

  • The kinetics rate data provide valuable information regarding the rate of the anaerobic digestion thermally hydrolyzed OFMSW.

1. Data

The ratio of soluble to particulate COD in the raw and thermally hydrolyzed OFMSW samples are compared in Fig. 1. The experimentally measured biogas and biomethane production data throughout the BMP experiment are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The cumulative biomethane yield in terms of mL CH4/g VSS-added and L CH4/L feedstock-added are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The ultimate methane yield of the digesters fed with raw and thermally hydrolyzed substrates are compared in Fig. 4. The percentage improvements in the ultimate methane yield of the thermally hydrolyzed digesters in comparison with that of the control digester are shown in Fig. 5. The first-order specific biodegradation rate constants of the BMP digesters are presented in Fig. 6.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The ratio of soluble to particulate COD.

Table 1.

Daily biogas production data from the BMP digesters at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).

Time (day) Severity index (SI) temperature (°C)-holding time (min)
Control
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
150°C 30min 160°C 20min 170°C 10min 170°C 30min 180°C 15min 190°C 10min 190°C 20min 200°C 10min 210°C 10min 210°C 20min 220°C 10min 230°C 05min 220°C 30min 230 °C 15min 240°C 20min
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 42 54 43 59 47 31 36 26 30 28 27 43 37 45 42 49
4 99 110 111 111 105 68 74 54 63 65 56 79 89 78 71 93
7 199 209 210 215 207 124 134 104 119 107 96 116 152 118 105 153
9 345 355 359 367 356 179 197 160 175 164 149 166 220 176 158 209
13 433 451 464 473 459 274 321 292 284 309 246 344 250 324 323 360
15 557 577 596 607 598 424 485 439 428 453 348 496 340 430 440 465
17 692 711 743 758 740 620 672 624 606 622 500 634 650 560 556 600
20 741 755 802 815 805 760 825 794 765 761 695 733 763 690 690 660
22 768 783 831 846 837 815 874 846 813 831 777 782 806 760 764 680
27 787 803 851 865 854 857 924 894 854 878 835 823 824 836 829 713
30 826 844 882 897 886 889 945 920 889 906 865 851 857 856 859 735
35 855 873 915 933 920 920 970 942 922 917 888 871 890 880 864 765
38 860 885 919 936 924 941 977 956 944 927 909 891 895 888 886 780
41 864 891 924 939 939 958 982 969 951 936 915 897 901 900 884 785

Table 2.

Daily biomethane production data from the BMP digesters at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).

Time (day) Severity index (SI) temperature (°C)-holding time (min)
Control
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
150°C 30min 160°C 20min 170°C 10min 170°C 30min 180°C 15min 190°C 10min 190°C 20min 200°C 10min 210°C 10min 210°C 20min 220°C 10min 230°C 05min 220°C 30min 230°C 15min 240°C 20min
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 27 35 28 38 31 20 23 17 20 18 18 28 24 29 27 32
4 64 72 72 72 68 44 48 35 41 42 36 51 58 51 46 60
7 129 136 137 140 135 81 87 68 77 70 62 75 99 77 68 99
9 224 231 233 239 231 116 128 104 114 107 97 108 143 114 103 136
13 281 293 302 307 298 178 209 190 185 201 160 224 163 211 210 234
15 362 375 387 395 389 276 315 285 278 294 226 322 221 280 286 302
17 450 462 483 493 481 403 437 406 394 404 325 412 423 364 361 390
20 482 491 521 530 523 494 536 516 497 495 452 476 496 449 449 429
22 499 509 540 550 544 530 568 550 528 540 505 508 524 494 497 442
27 512 522 553 562 555 557 601 581 555 571 543 535 536 543 539 463
30 537 549 573 583 576 578 614 598 578 589 562 553 557 556 558 478
35 556 567 595 606 598 598 631 612 599 596 577 566 579 572 562 497
38 559 575 597 608 601 612 635 621 614 603 591 579 582 577 576 507
41 562 579 601 610 610 623 638 630 618 608 595 583 586 585 575 510

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The cumulative methane yields of the BMP digesters as mL CH4/g VSS-added.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The cumulative methane yields of the BMP digesters as L CH4/L feedstock-added.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The ultimate methane yield as mL CH4/g VSS-added.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Percentage improvement in ultimate methane yield compared to the control (non-pretreated) digester (%).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

First-order specific biodegradation rate constant of the raw and thermally hydrolyzed digesters.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Procedure of volume data conversion to the standard temperature & pressure condition

The volume of the produced biogas/methane throughout the BMP assay under the mesophilic temperature of 38 °C and atmospheric room pressure was converted to the standard temperature & pressure condition (0 °C and 1 atm) using Eq. (1)

VSTP=Vm(PmPSTP)(TSTPTm) (1)

where,

  • VSTP: Biogas/methane volume of the at the standard temperature & pressure condition (mL)

  • Vm: Actual recorded biogas/methane volume (mL)

  • Pm: Actual atmospheric pressure at the time of recording the biogas/methane volume (atm)

  • PSTP: Standard pressure (1 atm)

  • TSTP: Standard temperature (273.15°C)

  • Tm: Digester temperature (273.15+38=311.15°C)

2.2. Biodegradation kinetics rate calculation

The data regarding the rate of organics (COD, VSS, etc.) biodegradation through the digestion process were defined by the first-order reaction model [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Eq. (2) shows the kinetic reaction model used to calculate the first-order rate constants data for the TCOD degradation of the digesters.

r=dAdt=kAt (2)

in which r, k, and At are respectively the organics removal rate (e.g., TCOD degradation rate in mg/L.d), the first-order specific biodegradation rate constant (1/d), and the remaining concentration of organics (e.g., TCOD concentration in mg/L) at time t. By integrating and rearranging Eqs. (2) and (3) will be obtained as follows:

At=Auekt (3)

in which Au is the ultimate biodegradable organics concentration (mg/L), and the rest of the parameters are as defined before.

2.3. Analytical procedure

The amount of the daily biogas production was measured manually using a 100 mL air-tight Poulten & Graf Fortuna™ glass syringe. The composition of the biogas produced throughout the BMP assay was measured in terms of CH4, CO2, and H2 gases using a gas chromatograph (Thermo Scientific Trace 1310). The Trace 1310 gas chromatograph was equipped with a packed column (model: TG-Bond Msieve 5A) with 30 m length and diameter of 0.53 mm. It was also utilized a thermal conductivity detector with oven, filament, and detector temperatures of 80, 250, and 100 °C, respectively. The analysis of COD was performed calorimetrically following the closed reflux methodology outlined by the Standard Methods [8]. A Hach spectrophotometer (model DR3900) was used for COD analysis and the measurements were done at the wavelength at 600 nm. The statistical analysis was performed using Minitab Software 17.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support received from Southern Ontario Water Consortium (SOWC). The authors also thank the technical support from Disco Road organics processing facility in Toronto, Canada.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2019.01.018.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (461.9KB, pdf)

.

References

  • 1.Razavi A.S., Hosseini Koupaie E., Azizi A., Hafez H., Elbeshbishy E. Hydrothermal pretreatment of source separated organics for enhanced solubilization and biomethane recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2019;274:502–511. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.E.H. Koupaie, Radio frequency sludge hydrolysis as an energy efficient alternative to microwave and conductive heating for advanced anaerobic digestion, in: School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada, 2017.
  • 3.Mahmoodi P., Karimi K., Taherzadeh M.J. Hydrothermal processing as pretreatment for efficient production of ethanol and biogas from municipal solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2018;261:166–175. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carrere H., Dumas C., Battimelli A., Batsone D.J., Delgenes J.P., Steyer J.P. Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;183:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Karthikeyan O.P., Trably E., Mehariya S., Bernet N., Wong J.W., Carrere H. Pretreatment of food waste for methane and hydrogen recovery: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2018;249:1025–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hosseini Koupaie E., Johnson T., Eskicioglu C. Comparison of different electricity-based thermal pretreatment methods for enhanced bioenergy production from municipal sludge. Molecules. 2018;23:1–15. doi: 10.3390/molecules23082006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang C., Xie S., Zhong M. Effect of hydrothermal pretreatment on kitchen waste for biodiesel production using alkaline catalyst. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2017;8:369–377. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.APHA . Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. American Public Health Association; Washington, DC, USA: 2005. (WPCF) [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (461.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES