Abstract
A pink isolate (QT5-19) of Botrytis cinerea was compared with three gray isolates of B. cinerea for growth and morphogenesis on potato dextrose agar (PDA), and for pathogenicity on tobacco. A double-stranded (ds) RNA mycovirus infecting QT5-19 was identified based on its genome feature and morphology of the virus particles. The results showed that QT5-19 grew rapidly and established flourishing colonies as the gray isolates did. However, it is different from the gray isolates, as it failed to produce conidia and sclerotia asthe gray isolates did. QT5-19 hardly infected tobacco, whereas the gray isolates aggressively infected tobacco. Two dsRNAs were detected in QT5-19, dsRNA 1 and dsRNA 2, were deduced to encode two polypepetides with homology to viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and coat protein (CP), respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences of RdRp and CP indicated that the two dsRNAs represent the genome of a novel partitivirus in the genus Alphapartitivirus, designated here as Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 2 (BcPV2). BcPV2 in QT5-19 was successfully transmitted to the three gray isolates through hyphal contact. The resulting BcPV2-infected derivatives showed rapid growth on PDA with defects in conidiogenesis and sclerogenesis, and hypovirulence on tobacco. This study suggests that BcPV2 is closely associated with hypovirulence of B. cinerea.
Keywords: Botrytis cinerea, hypovirulence, partitivirus, conidiogenesis, sclerogenesis
1. Introduction
Mycoviruses (or fungal viruses) are viruses infecting filamentous fungi, yeasts, and oomycetes [1,2,3]. Previous studies demonstrated that mycoviruses widely exist in all major taxonomic groups of fungi and oomycetes [4]. Most mycoviruses have the genomes of RNA, either double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), whereas a few mycoviruses have the genomes of single-stranded DNA or ssDNA [5]. The mycoviruses in the families Chrysoviridae, Megabirnaviridae, Patitiviridae, Reoviridae, and Totiviridae have the dsRNA genomes, which are encapsidated within the coat proteins (CP), thereby forming virus particles. On the other hand, the mycoviruses in the other families such as Hypoviridae and Narnaviridae have the positive ssRNA (+ssRNA) genomes, which are unencapsidated without formation of virus particles [6,7]. Recently, a few mycoviruses with the genomes of negative ssRNA (−ssRNA) have been identified in a few plant pathogenic fungi, including Botrytis cinerea [8,9], Erysiphe pisi [10], Fusarium graminearum [11], and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [12].
Partitiviruses have been identified in fungi, as well as in plants and protozoa [1,13]. The genome of each partitivirus possesses two dsRNA segments (dsRNA 1 and dsRNA 2), which have the length ranging from 1300 bp to 2500 bp. Each dsRNA segment contains one open reading frame (ORF) on the positive RNA strand. The ORF in dsRNA 1 usually codes for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), whereas the ORF in dsRNA 2 usually codes for coat protein (CP), thereby forming virus particles with the isometric shape of 25 to 40 nm in diameter [13,14].
Botrytis cinerea Pers.: Fr. (teleomorph Botryotinia fuckeliana (de Bary) Whetzel) is a ubiquitous plant pathogenic fungus [15,16]. It causes gray mold disease on more than 1400 plant species, including many economically important crops such as cucumber (Cucumis sativus), strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa), table grapes (Vitis vinifera), and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) [17]. Substantial economic losses can be caused by B. cinerea in these crops before or after harvest under cool-to-temperate and humid conditions [18]. B. cinerea is a typical necrotrophic fungus and it usually uses an arsenal of chemical weapons (i.e., cell-wall-degrading enzymes and phytotoxic metabolites) to infect plant tissues [19]. Thus far, cultivars/varieties highly resistant to infection by B. cinerea are not available in the crops mentioned above. Control of B. cinerea in these crops largely depends on the repeated use of fungicides in China as well as in many other countries [16]. The chemical control is effective when appropriate fungicides are applied to plant tissues in a timely manner. However, some unintended side effects, including fungicide residues in crop produces, pollution to environments, development of fungicide-resistant individuals of B. cinerea, may arise due to repeated use of fungicides, thereby causing public concerns over use of the fungicides for control of B. cinerea. Therefore, it is necessary to explore alternative measures to control B. cinerea, including biological control using ‘natural enemies’ such as mycoviruses.
Studies on mycoviruses infecting B. cinerea dated back to the middle of the 1990s, when Howitt and colleagues (1995) first observed virus-like particles (VLPs) in B. cinerea and detected dsRNA molecules in this fungus [20]. Since then, many researchers showed interests in identification of mycoviruses in different isolates of B. cinerea [8,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Several mycoviruses from B. cinerea have been characterized at the genome level, including Botrytis virus F (BVF) [21], Botrytis virus X (BVX) [22], Botrytis cinerea endornavirus 1 (BcEV1) [27], Botrytis cinerea hypovirus 1 (BcHV1) [28], Botrytis cinerea fusarivirus 1 (BcFV1) [28], Botrytis cinerea mitovirus 1 (BcMV1) [24], Botrytis cinerea mymonavirus 1 (BcMyV1) [9], Botrytis cinerea negative-stranded RNA virus 1 (BcNSRV-1) [8], Botrytis ourmia-like virus (BOLV1) [26], Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 1 (BcPV1) [31], Botrytis cinerea RNA virus 1 (BcRV1) [32], Botryotinia fuckeliana partitivirus 1 (BfPV1) [33], and Botryotinia fuckeliana totivirus 1 (BfTV1) [34]. Among these mycoviruses, BcEV1, BcFV1, BcHV1, BcMV1, BcMyV1, BcNSRV-1, BcPV1, BcRV1, and BOLV1 were found to be closely associated with hypovirulence of B. cinerea [8,9,23,26,28,31,32]. However, none of these mycoviruses has been found to have potential as a biocontrol agent for control of the diseases caused by B. cinerea. Two factors might be responsible for this situation. First, the mycoviruses have limited horizontal transmissibility possibly due to hyphal (vegetative) incompatibility between the mycoviruses-containing and mycoviruses-free individuals. Second, the mycovirus-infected B. cinerea isolates usually grow poorly [23,35] and they may have lower competitive ability than the virulent isolates. Therefore, potential mycoviruses for successful control of B. cinerea need to overcome these limitations.
A pink-colored isolate (QT5-19) of B. cinerea was obtained from a diseased fruit of tomato collected in Shaanxi Province of China. Our preliminary study showed that QT5-19 was almost non-pathogenic on many plants, including tomato, tobacco and oilseed rape (Brassica napus), suggesting that this isolate was debilitated in pathogenicity or virulence. It is suspected that some mycoviruses may exist in this particular isolate. Therefore, this study was conducted to characterize the mycovirus in QT5-19.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Fungal Isolates and Cultural Conditions
Five fungal isolates of B. cinerea (08168, B05.10, QT5-19, RoseBC-3, XN-1) were used in this study. QT5-19 was isolated from a diseased fruit of tomato collected from Shaanxi Province of China. The identity of QT5-19 as B. cinerea was confirmed both by PCR detection using the B. cinerea-specific PCR primers reported by [36], and by analysis of the sequence of ITS-rDNA [37] region. Four other B. cinerea isolates (08168, B05.10, RoseBC-3, XN-1) were obtained from our previous collection and their origin was described in related reports [37,38,39,40,41]. All the fungal isolates were incubated at 20 °C on potato dextrose agar (PDA) in the dark for 2 to 3 days to determine radial growth rates and for 20 days to determine sclerotial production [42].
Production of the pink color in the colonies of QT5-19 suggests that this isolate may produce the pink pigment bikaverin [43]. In order to confirm this hypothesis, expression of six bikaverin biosynthesis-related genes (bcbik1 to bcbik6) in QT5-19 (pink color) and B05.10 (gray color) was detected by RT-PCR (Figure S1) using the total RNA of each isolate as template and the specific PCR primer sets listed in Table S1. To confirm correctness of the bcbik1 gene in QT5-19, the RT-PCR product of bcbik1 from QT5-19 was purified from the agarose gel, cloned into E. coli DH5α and sequenced, and the resulting cDNA sequence was compared with the DNA sequence of bcbik1 in B. cinerea isolate 1750 (GenBank Acc. No. HE802550) (Figure S2).
2.2. Determination of Pathogenicity
Seeds of tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) were sown in plastic pots containing Organic Culture Mix containing 2% to 5% of N + P2O5 + K2O (w:w, N:P2O5:K2O = 1:1:1) (Zheng Jiang Pei Lei Organic Manure Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Zhengjiang City, Jiangsu Province, China). The pots were placed in a growth room at 20 °C for 40 days under the lighting regime of 12-h light/12-h dark and watered as required. Fully-expanded leaves were detached from the plants and placed on moist paper towels in a plastic tray (45 × 30 × 2.5 cm, length × width × height) with their adaxial surface facing up. Mycelial agar plugs (5 mm in diameter) from the margin area of a two-day-old PDA culture of an investigated isolate of B. cinerea were placed on the leaves, one mycelial agar plug per leaf and six leaves (as six replicates) for each isolate. The tray was covered with a 0.1-mm-thick transparent plastic film (Gold Mine Plastic Industry Ltd., Jiang Men City, China) to maintain high humidity and placed in a growth chamber at 20 °C for three days (12-h light/12-h dark). Diameter of the leaf lesion formed around each mycelial agar plug was measured.
Additionally, isolates QT5-19 and B05.10 were tested for infection of apple (Malus demestica), table grapes (Vitis vinifera), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), cucumber (Cucumis sativus), oilseed rape (Brassica napus), and strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) (cultivars unknown for all of the investigated crops). Fruits of apple, table grapes and tomato purchased from a local supermarket, and leaves of cucumber, oilseed rape, and strawberry detached from adult plants were placed on moist paper towels in plastic trays with three replicates for each of the two isolates, three fruits or three leaves per replicate, one agar plug on each fruit or leaf. The trays were individually covered with transparent plastic films and placed in the growth chamber (20 °C) for three days. Lesion diameter on each fruit or leaf around each mycelial agar plug was measured (Figure S3).
2.3. Extraction of dsRNAs
Isolate QT5-19 was inoculated on cellophane films (CF) placed on PDA in Petri dishes as the CF-PDA cultures. The cultures were incubated at 20 °C in the dark for three days. The mycelial mass was harvested from the cultures and ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen. DsRNAs were extracted from the mycelial powder using the cellulose (CF-11) chromatography method described by Wu and colleagues (2007, 2010, 2012). The extract was digested with RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for elimination of DNA contamination and with S1 nuclease (TaKaRa) for elimination of single-stranded RNAs (ssRNAs) in the extracts. The dsRNAs were detected by agarose gel (0.7% or 1.0%, w/v) and visualized by staining with Biosharp® SuperRed/GelRed (Guangzhou Sai Guo Biotechnol. Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China).
2.4. cDNA Cloning of the dsRNAs
The dsRNAs extracted from isolate QT5-19 were purified from an agarose gel after electrophoresis using Axygen® DNA gel extraction kit (Axygen® Scientific Inc., Union City, CA, USA). The pure dsRNAs were ligated with the adaptor 110a (Figure S4, Table S1) at the 3′-terminus using T4 RNA ligase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 16 °C for 12 h. The adaptor-ligated dsRNAs were purified using AxyPrepTM PCR cleanup kit (Axygen Scientific Inc., Union City, CA, USA). For synthesis of cDNAs, the adaptor-ligated dsRNAs (10 µL) were mixed with 1 µL oligonucleotide primer RC110a (complementary to the adaptor 110a, Supporting Information Table S1), 1 µL dNTPs (10 mmol/L), 1 µL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 2 µL DEPC-H2O. The mixture was denatured at 98 °C and chilled on ice for 120 s. Then, PrimeScript II reverse transcriptase (TaKaRa Biotechnol. Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) and 5× PrimeScript II buffer (TaKaRa) were added to the mixture and the reverse transcription was done at 42 °C for 1.5 h. The full-length cDNAs were PCR amplified in S1000TM Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA USA) using the synthetic cDNAs as templates in the presence of the primer RC110a [44]. The cDNA cloning was repeated five times to guarantee sequence accuracy. All the PCR products were separated by 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by gel purification of the cDNA molecules and ligation of the cDNAs into the pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa), which was then transformed into E. coli DH5α (TaKaRa) for proliferation and sequencing.
2.5. Analysis of the Mycoviral Genome
The open reading frame (ORF) in the full-length cDNA sequence of each mycoviral dsRNA was identified using the ORF Finder program in GenBank at the website of NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with the standard codon usage. The conserved domains and motifs in each ORF were identified by comparison with those in related genomes deposited in the public databases of GenBank and PROSITE (http://prosite.expasy.org/). Multiple sequence alignment of the amino acid sequence for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) was performed using the T-Coffee server in the website (http://tcoffee.crg.cat/apps/tcoffee). The gaps were manually removed using the CLUSTAL_W program. Nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) sequences of the previously-reported partitiviruses and related members were retrieved from GenBank (Table S2). They were used for comparative analysis and for inference of the phylogenetic relationship of the mycovirus in QT5-19. Phylogenetic trees were generated based on the amino acid sequences of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and coat protein (CP) using the Maximum-Likelihood (ML) method in the MEGA software version 7.0 [45]. They were individually tested with the bootstrap value of 1000 to ascertain the reliability of a given pattern of the ML trees. Potential secondary structures at the 5′- and 3′-termini of each dsRNA were predicted using RNA Structure version 5.8.1 [46].
2.6. Purification of Virus Particles
Isolate QT5-19 was incubated on CF-PDA at 20 °C for eight days. The mycelial mass (~8 g) harvested from the CF-PDA cultures was ground to fine powder in liquid nitrogen and the powder was suspended in 200 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (0.1 mol/L, pH 7) amended with 6 mL Triton-X 100. The slurry was further homogenized in a glass homogenizer for 30 min. The homogenate was transferred to a 200-mL-plastic tube and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min to remove the hyphal debris. The supernatant was transferred to another plastic tube and centrifuged at 119,000× g under 4 °C for 2 h. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was suspended in 0.1 mol/L PBS and the suspension was centrifuged at 16,000× g for 20 min to remove large particles. The supernatant was loaded in a centrifuge tube containing sucrose with the concentration gradient ranging from 10% to 50% (w/v) and centrifuged at 70,000× g under 4 °C for 2 h. The fractions were carefully collected by punching the centrifuge tube with a clean sterilized syringe and separately measured for the existence of the virus partials by detection of the abundance of the dsRNAs by agarose electrophoresis. The fraction containing the virus particles was suspended in 50 μL PBS (50 mmol/L, pH 7.0). The virus particles were stained with phosphotungstic acid (20 g/L, w/v, pH 7.4) and observed under transmission electron microscope (TEM). The dsRNAs from the viral particles were extracted with phenol chloroform isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v:v:v), and detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Meanwhile, the purified virus particles in PBS were boiled and denatured at 100 °C for 5 min, and the solution was centrifuged at 12,000 r/min for 2 min. The resulting supernatant was mixed with 5× Tris-glycerol loading buffer (250 mM Tris·HCl, 10% SDS, 30% glycerol, 10 mM DTT, 0.05% bromophenol blue, pH 6.8) at the volume ratio of 1:5. The mixture was the loaded in a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The pre-stained protein ladder, PageRulerTM (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Watham, MA USA) was loaded in the gel as the molecular weight standard. After electrophoresis (120 V, 2.5 h), the gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250.
2.7. RT-PCR Detection of the Mycovirus in QT5-19 and Northern Blotting
Total RNA was extracted from the mycelia of the investigated isolates of B. cinerea using TaKaRa RNAiso Plus Total RNA Extraction Reagents (TaKaRa). It was used in reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) for detection of the mycovirus in QT5-19 and other isolates with the specific primer pairs BcPVRd-F/BcPVRd-R and BcPVCP-F/BcPVCP-R targeting the ORFs for RdRp and CP, respectively (Table S1). Meanwhile, a specific primer pair Act-F/Act-R targeting the actin gene of B. cinerea was used as a reference gene in RT-PCR [32].
Northern blotting was carried out to confirm authenticity of the full-length cDNAs from the dsRNAs in isolate QT5-19. It was done using the procedure described in our previous studies [23,35]. Two DNA probes targeting the two ORFs of the dsRNAs coding for RdRp and CP were generated by PCR with the two cDNAs as templates and the specific primer pairs RdRp-F/RdRp-R and CP-F/CP-R (Figure S5, Table S1).
2.8. Horizontal Transmission of the Mycovirus in QT5-19
Horizontal transmission of the mycovirus from QT5-19 (donor) to B. cinerea isolates 08168, B05.10, RoseBc-3, and XN-1 (recipients) was done on PDA in Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter) using the pair culturing technique described in our previous study [44]. Three derivative isolates were obtained from the colonies of each recipient in the four-day-old pair-cultures. These derivatives were easily distinguished from QT5-19, as they formed gray-colored colonies rather than pink-colored colonies like those of QT5-19. Five representative derivatives (08168T, B05.10T, RoseBc-3T, and XN-1T from 08168, B05.10, RoseBc-3, and XN-1 in the pair-cultures, respectively) were tested for the presence of the mycovirus by dsRNA profiling and RT-PCR with the mycovirus-specific primer pairs RdRp-f1/RdRp-r1 and CP-f1/CP-r1 (Table S1). Meanwhile, these derivatives, as well as their parents, were tested for growth rates and production of conidia/sclerotia on PDA, and for pathogenicity on tobacco leaves using the methods described above.
2.9. Elimination of the Mycovirus in QT5-19
Four trials (protoplast regeneration, hyphal tipping, thermal treatment, and ribavirin treatment) were done to eliminate the mycovirus in isolate QT5-19. In the protoplast regeneration trial, the two-day-old mycelial mass of QT5-19 from the CF-PDA cultures was harvested and blended to hyphal fragments in sterile distilled water (10 g fresh mycelia in 100 mL water). The resulting hyphal fragment suspension (HFS) was inoculated in a 250-mL-Erlenmeyer flask containing PDB at the volume ratio of 1:20 (HFS:PDB), and incubated overnight at 150 rpm and 20 °C. The culture was centrifuged at 2000× g and 4 °C for 10 min to collect the mycelial pellet, which was then suspended in 1 mol/L sorbitol amended with 1% (w/v) Lysing Enzyme L2265 (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company Ltd., St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.1% snailase (w/v) (Solarbio® Life Sciences, Beijing, China). The suspension was gently shaken at 30 °C for 3 h to release the protoplasts and the resulting mixture was filtered through double-layered filter papers to remove the hyphal fragments. The protoplasts were collected by centrifugation under 4 °C at 2000× g for 20 min, washed twice with 1 mol/L d-sorbitol, and suspended in STC buffer (1 mol/L d-sorbitol, 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 50 mmol/L CaCl2). The suspension was plated on TB3 medium (2 g casein hydrolysate, 5 g yeast extract, 25 g sucrose, 15 g agar, 1000 mL water) and the culture was incubated at 20 °C for seven days for protoplast regeneration and hyphal growth. Fifty-one emerged fungal colonies were individually transferred to fresh PDA, incubated at 20 °C in the dark for 15 days and the colony morphology (color, production of conidia and sclerotia) was observed.
In the hyphal-tipping trial, QT5-19 was incubated on water agar at 20 °C for three days. The cultures were placed under a dissecting light microscope. Hyphal tips (approximately 80 µm in length) in the colony margin were individually cut using a fine needle and transferred to PDA in Petri dishes, one hyphal tip per dish. The resulting cultures were incubated at 20 °C for 15 days and the colony morphology was observed.
In the thermal treatment, QT5-19 was incubated on PDA at 30 °C for 30 days. Mycelial agar plugs (~3 mm in diameter) were removed from the margin area of the cultures. They were individually transferred to fresh PDA in Petri dishes, one mycelial agar plug per dish. The resulting cultures were incubated at 30 °C for 30 days and each culture was sub-cultured again on PDA at 30 °C for 30 days. Finally, the cultures were transformed to PDA and incubated at 20 °C for 15 days, and the colony morphology of each subculture was observed.
In the ribavirin treatment, QT5-19 was inoculated in PDA amended with ribavirin at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/mL. The cultures were incubated at 20 °C for seven days. Then, mycelial agar plugs were removed from the cultures of each ribavirin treatment and transferred to new PDA containing the same concentrations of ribavirin and the subcultures were incubated at 20 °C also for seven days. This process was repeated two more times. Finally, the subcultures were incubated on PDA alone at 20 °C for 15 days and the colony morphology of each subculture was observed.
Seventy out of the 111 derivative isolates of QT5-19 from the above-mentioned trials were arbitrarily selected (15, 15, 20, and 20 isolates from hyphal tipping, thermotherapy, chemotherapy and protoplast regeneration, respectively). They were incubated on PDA at 20 °C in the dark for observation of the colony morphology and for detection of the mycovirus by dsRNA profiling and RT-PCR with the specific primers RdRp-f1/RdRp-r1 and CP-f1/CP-r2 (Table S1, Figure S6).
2.10. Statistical Analysis
Data in each experiment or assay were analyzed using the procedure of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in the SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, v. 8.0, 1999). Treatment means about mycelial growth rates on PDA in the colony morphology-characterization trials, lesion diameters on leaves of tobacco in the pathogenicity tests were separated using the least significant difference (LSD) test at α = 0.05. Means about mycelial growth rates and numbers of sclerotia per dish on PDA, and leaf lesion diameters on tobacco and between each BcPV2-transfected derivative (08168T, B05.10T, RoseBc-3T, XN-1T) and its parental isolate (08168, B05.10, RoseBc-3, XN-1) were compared using Student’s t test at α = 0.05 or 0.01.
3. Results
3.1. Cultural Characteristics
Isolate QT5-19 grew at an average rate of 1.2 cm/d on PDA at 20 °C and colonized the entire Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter) after incubation for four days. This growth rate was slightly lower than those (1.5 cm/d) in three other isolates of B. cinerea (08168, B05.10, XN-1) under the same cultural conditions (Figure 1A,B). QT5-19 formed pink-colored colonies without production of any conidia and sclerotia even after incubation for 20 days. These morphological features differed from those of isolates 08168, B05.10 and XN-1, which formed gray-colored colonies with production of conidia and sclerotia (Figure 1A).
Despite the lack of typical cultural and morphological characteristics, QT5-19 was identified as B. cinerea based on two molecular features. First, QT5-19 showed the B. cinerea-specific marker, a 327-bp DNA fragment (Figure 1C), in PCR with the B. cinerea-specific primers Bc-f/Bc-r reported by Fan and colleagues [36]. Second, the nucleotide sequence of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-rDNA region of QT5-19 (GenBank Acc. No. KX822693) is 100% identical to the ITS sequence of B. cinerea B05.10 (GenBank Acc. No. CP009808) and 99% identical to the ITS sequence of B. cinerea XN-1 (GenBank Acc. No. KT266229).
The pink pigment produced by QT5-19 is possibly bikaverin, as all the six bikaverin biosynthesis-related genes (bcbik1 to bcbik6) were expressed in this isolate (Figure S1). The RT-PCR product of bcbik1 coding for polyketide synthase (PKS) was cloned from QT5-19 and sequenced. The 679-bp cDNA fragment (GenBank Acc. No. MH747471) was 100% identical to the DNA sequence of bcbik1 in the bikaverin-producing isolate INRA 1750 of B. cinerea (GenBank Acc. No. HE802550) (Figure S2). On the other hand, isolate B05.10 of B. cinerea failed to produce bikaverin on PDA. It had expression of five of these six bikaverin biosynthesis-related genes (bcbik2 to bcbik6), but had no expression of bcbik1 (Figure S1), as it lacks this gene in its genome [43].
3.2. Hypovirulence
Results of the pathogenicity test showed that isolate QT5-19 caused no infection or produced tiny lesions on leaves of tobacco, as well as on leaves of cucumber, oilseed rape, and strawberry, and on fruits of apple, table grapes and tomato at 3 days post-inoculation (dpi) under 20 °C with average lesion diameters ranging from 0.0 to 0.3 cm (Figure 2A,B, Figure S3). In contrast, B05.10, 08168 and XN-1 caused large necrotic lesions on the tobacco leaves with average lesion diameters of 3.1, 3.8, and 4.0 cm, respectively (Figure 2). B05.10 caused large necrotic lesions on apple, cucumber, oilseed rape, strawberry, table grapes, tobacco, and tomato with average lesion diameters ranging from 1.8 cm to 3.0 cm (Figure S3).
3.3. The dsRNA Elements
Two dsRNA molecules (dsRNA 1 and dsRNA 2) of ~2 kb in size were detected in the extracts of nucleic acids from the mycelia of QT5-19 (Figure 3). In contrast, no dsRNAs were detected in the virulent isolates 08168, B05.10, RoseBc-3, and XN-1 of B. cinerea. To determine persistency of the two dsRNAs in QT5-19, repeated attempts using four different approaches (protoplast regeneration, thermotherapy, hyphal tipping, chemotherapy) were made to eliminate the dsRNAs from QT5-19. A total of 111 derivatives were obtained, 15 from hyphal tipping, 15 from thermotherapy, 30 from chemotherapy, and 51 from protoplast regeneration. All these derivatives of QT5-19 formed colonies with the morphology similar to that of the parent QT5-19 (pink color, no production of conidia and sclerotia) on PDA at 20 °C. Seventy derivatives (15 from hyphal tipping, 15 from thermotherapy, 20 from chemotherapy, and 20 from protoplast regeneration) were randomly selected and individually tested for the presence of the dsRNAs by dsRNA profiling and RT-PCR using the total RNA as template and RdRp-f1/RdRp-r1 and CP-f1/CP-r1 as specific primers (Table S1). The results showed that all the selected derivatives contained two dsRNAs with the same size as those in QT5-19 (Figure S6).
3.4. Virus Particles
Virus particles were isolated from the mycelia of QT5-19 and purified by sucrose density-gradient centrifugation. They are isometric in shape under transmission electronic microscope (TEM) with an average diameter of 36 nm (Figure 4A). They contain two dsRNAs with the same size as those extracted from the mycelia of QT5-19 (Figure 4B) and a protein with the molecular weight of ~68 kDa (Figure 4C).
3.5. Identity of the Two dsRNAs
The dsRNAs in QT5-19 were purified from agarose gels after electrophoresis. They were ligated with the adaptor sequence 110a (Figure S4) at the 3′-terminus of each dsRNA. The adaptor-dsRNA molecules were reverse transcribed to cDNAs, which were then used as templates in PCR for cDNA amplification with the primer RC110a complementary to the adaptor 110a (Table S1). The resulting DNA products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and the purified fragments were cloned into the pMD18-T vector, which was then transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α and sequenced. The full-length cDNAs for dsRNA 1 (GenBank Acc. No. MG011707) and dsRNA 2 (GenBank Acc. No. MG011708) are 1909 and 1883 bp long, respectively. Northern blotting confirmed authenticity of the cDNAs from the dsRNAs in QT5-19 (Figure S5).
Analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the two dsRNAs showed that the coding strand of each dsRNA contains one open reading frame (ORF) flanked by two untranslated regions (UTRs) at 3′- and 5′-termini (Figure 5A). The two dsRNAs shares 63.9% nucleotide identity at the 3′-terminus (72 bp long) and 96.1% nucleotide identity at the 5′-terminus (76 bp long) (Figure 5B). Additionally, the 5′- and 3′-UTRs of each dsRNA were predicted to be able to form stem-loop structures (Figure 5C).
The ORF in dsRNA 1 was predicted to encode a polypeptide containing 579 amino acid (aa) residues with the estimated molecular weight of 67.08 kDa. Homology searches in the database of GenBank showed that the 579-aa protein is identical by 13%–76% to the RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRp) encoded by ten partitiviruses, including Botryotinia fuckeliana partitivirus 1 (BfPV1, 13% identity), Ceratobasidium partitivirus (CPV, 76% identity), Flammulina velutipes isometric virus (FvIV, 42% identity), Fusarium solani partitivirus 2 (FsPV2, 41% identity), Grapevine partitivirus (GPV, 53% identity), Powdery mildew-associated partitivirus (PmAPV, 51% identity), Rhizoctonia solani partitivirus 1 (RsPV1, 43% identity), Rosellinia necatrix partitivirus 5 (RnPV5, 40% identity), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum partitivirus S (SsPV-S, 46% identity), and Soybean leaf-associated partitivirus 2 (SLAPV2, 58% identity) (Table 1). It contains six motifs (Motif III to Motif VIII) (Figure 6A), which are also present in the RdRps of some other partitiviruses, such as Beet cryptic virus 1 (BCV1), CPV, Dill cryptic virus 1 (DCV1), PmAPV, Rosellinia necatrix partitivirus 2 (RsPV2), Vicia cryptic virus (VCV), and white clover cryptic virus 1 (WCCV1) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Viruses | GenBank Acc. No. | Size (aa) | Identity (%) | Overlap (Positions) | Bit Score | E-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RdRp | ||||||
Ceratobasidium partitivirus (CPV) | AOX47571 | 579 | 76 | 440/578 | 917 | 0.0 |
Soybean leaf-associated partitivirus 2 (SLAPV2) | ALM62247 | 602 | 58 | 341/583 | 681 | 0.0 |
Grapevine partitivirus (GPV) | AFX73022 | 584 | 53 | 311/587 | 631 | 0.0 |
Powdery mildew-associated partitivirus (PmAPV) | YP_009272944 | 584 | 51 | 301/587 | 605 | 0.0 |
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum partitivirus S (SsPV-S) | YP_003082248 | 580 | 46 | 263/566 | 472 | 1 × 10−157 |
Rhizoctonia solani partitivirus 1 (RsPV1) | AND83003 | 603 | 43 | 234/549 | 431 | 4 × 10−141 |
Flammulina velutipes isometric virus (FvIV) | BAH08700 | 587 | 42 | 252/594 | 436 | 2 × 10−143 |
Fusarium solani partitivirus 2 (FsPV2) | BAQ36631 | 608 | 41 | 242/587 | 402 | 5 × 10−130 |
Rosellinia necatrix partitivirus 5 (RnPV5) | BAM36403 | 647 | 40 | 230/568 | 414 | 6 × 10−134 |
Botryotinia fuckeliana partitivirus 1 (BfPV1) | YP_001686789 | 540 | 13 * | 40/293 | - ** | - |
CP | ||||||
Ceratobasidium partitivirus (CPV) | AOX47604 | 370 | 60 | 221/370 | 473 | 1 × 10−161 |
Soybean leaf-associated partitivirus 2 (SLAPV2) | ALM62248 | 496 | 34 | 169/498 | 272 | 8 × 10−82 |
Powdery mildew-associated partitivirus (PmAPV) | YP_009272945 | 527 | 31 | 164/528 | 238 | 2 × 10−68 |
Diuris pendunculata cryptic virus (DpCV) | AFY23215 | 496 | 31 | 36/116 | 58 | 2 × 10−05 |
Carrot cryptic virus (CCV) | ACL93279 | 490 | 26 | 38/147 | 45.1 | 0.33 |
Spinach cryptic virus 1 (SCV) | APX42422 | 488 | 24 | 44/181 | 48.5 | 0.023 |
Rosellinia necatrix partitivirus 2 (RnPV2) | YP_007419078 | 483 | 23 | 77/333 | 47.4 | 0.057 |
Arabidopsis halleri partitivirus 1 (AhPV1) | YP_009273019 | 487 | 22 | 72/330 | 57 | 6 × 10−05 |
Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 1 (BcPV1) * | AGQ21570 | 634 | 14 * | 56/389 | - | - |
Botryotinia fuckeliana partitivirus 1 (BfPV1) * | YP_001686790 | 436 | 10 * | 41/408 | - | - |
* The values were calculated using the DNAMAN software (version 7.0), rather than provided in BLASTp search in NCBI, as the identity level between BcPV2 and BcPV1/BfPV1 is too low. ** The values cannot be calculated in the analysis with DNAMAN.
The ORF in dsRNA 2 was predicted to encode a polypeptide containing 528 aa residues with estimated molecular weight of 58.84 kDa. The polypeptide is identical by 10–60% to the coat proteins (CP) encoded by seven partitiviruses, including Arabidopsis halleri partitivirus 1 (AhPV1, 22% identity), BfPV1, Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 1 (BcPV1, 14% identity), CPV (60% identity), PmAPV (31% identity), RnPV2 (23% identity), and SLAPV2 (34% identity), and by 24–31% to the CPs encoded by three plant cryptic viruses, including carrot cryptic virus (CCV, 26% identity), Diuris pendunculata cryptic virus (DpCV, 31% identity) and spinach cryptic virus 1 (SCV, 24% identity) (Table 1). The aa sequence of CP found in this study and its homologs in CCV, CPV, DpCV, PmAPV, and SLAPV2 appeared to be highly divergent (Figure 6B). Therefore, the two dsRNAs in QT5-19 represent the genome of a novel partitivirus in the family Partitiviridae, which is hereafter designated as Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 2 (BcPV2).
The phylogeny of BcPV2 was inferred based on the aa sequences of RdRp and CP of this mycovirus and the known members in Partitiviridae (Table S2) using the Maximum-likelihood method. The results showed that BcPV2 belongs to the genus Alphapartitivirus (Figure 7A,B). It is closely related to CPV, PmAPV, and SLAPV2, but is distantly related to BcPV1 and BfPV1, which belong to the genera Betapartitivirus and Gammapartitivirus, respectively.
3.6. Horizontal Transmission of BcPV2
The pair-culturing technique [23,24,35] was used (Figure 8A) to test horizontal transmission of BcPV2 from the donor isolate QT5-19 to each of the four recipient isolates of B. cinerea (08168, B05.10, XN-1, RoseBc-3) on PDA at 20 °C (Figure 8B). Three derivatives (one from each pair culture) were obtained from the colonies of each recipient in the 4-day-old pair cultures of QT5-19 and that recipient. Four representative derivatives (08168T, B05.10T, RoseBc-3T, and XN-1T from 08168, B05.10, RoseBc-3, and XN-1, respectively) were selected (Figure 8C) and compared with their parents for the accumulation of BcPV2 in mycelia, mycelial growth rates and production of conidia/sclerotia on PDA (20 °C), and for pathogenicity on tobacco leaves. Results showed that B05.10T, 08168T, and XN-1T had BcPV2 accumulation, whereas RoseBc-3T did not have any detectable BcPV2 accumulation (Figure 9; Table 2). Therefore, horizontal transmission of BcPV2 was successful from QT5-19 to three of the four investigated isolates, but was unsuccessful from QT5-19 to RoseBc-3. Results also showed that B05.10T, 08168T, and XN-1T grew at the average rate of 1.5 cm/d, which did not significantly differ (p > 0.05) from those of their parents. However, they failed to produce conidia and sclerotia after incubation at 20 °C for 20 days, and these features differed from their parents (Table 2). As expected, RoseBc-3T showed the same phenotype as its parental isolate RoseBc-3 both in growth rate and in the production of conidia and sclerotia (Table 2). On tobacco leaves, B05.10T, 08168T and XN-1T caused average leaf lesion diameters of 2.2, 2.3, and 2.9 cm (20 °C, 3 dpi), respectively, and the values were significantly (p < 0.05) smaller than those of B05.10, 08168 and XN-1, which caused lesion diameters of 3.1, 3.8, and 4.0 cm, respectively (Table 2, Figure 10). However, RoseBc-3T caused an average lesion diameter of 2.2 cm, not significantly different (p > 0.05) from the average leaf lesion caused by RoseBc-3 (2.3 cm in diameter) (Table 2, Figure 10). Therefore, the introduction of BcPV2 from QT5-19 to B05.10, 08168, and XN-1 caused debilitation of pathogenicity and deficiency in formation of conidia and sclerotia.
Table 2.
Isolate | BcPV2 x | Mycelial Growth Rate (cm/day) y | Conidial Production y | No. Sclerotia per Dish y | Lesion Diameter (cm) z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QT5-19 | + | 1.2 | - | 0 | 0.2 |
B05.10 | - | 1.5 | + | 36 | 3.1 |
B05.10T | + | 1.5 | - | 0 ** | 2.2 * |
08168 | - | 1.5 | + | 38 | 3.8 |
08168T | + | 1.5 | - | 0 ** | 2.3 * |
XN-1 | - | 1.5 | + | 37 | 4.0 |
XN-1T | + | 1.5 | - | 0 ** | 2.9 * |
RoseBc-3 | - | 1.4 | + | 25 | 2.3 |
RoseBc-3T | - | 1.4 | + | 22 | 2.2 |
x BcPV2 was detected by dsRNA profiling and RT-PCR using the specific primer pairs RdRp-f1/RdRp-r1 (dsRNA 1) and CP-f1/CP-r1 (dsRNA-2). “+”, the presence of BcPV2; “-”, the absence of BcPV2. y Mycelial growth rate, conidial production, and sclerotial production were determined on PDA at 20 °C. Each value is an average of 5 replicates. “+” with conidia, “-” without conidia. “**” indicates significant difference at p < 0.01 between each recipient and its transfected derivative according to Student’s t test. z Pathogenicity was determined on detached tobacco leaves (20 °C, 72 h). Each value of lesion diameter is an average of seven replicates. “*” indicates significant difference at p < 0.05 between each recipient and its transfected derivative isolate according to Student’s t test.
4. Discussion
This study demonstrated that the pink isolate QT5-19 of B. cinerea is a hypovirulent isolate on apple, cucumber, oilseed rape, strawberry, table grapes, tobacco, and tomato, compared to the gray isolates 08168, B05.10, and XN-1of B. cinerea, which aggressively infected tobacco. Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 2 (BcPV2) was identified in QT5-19, whereas BcPV2 and other RNA mycoviruses were not detected in 08168, B05.10 and XN-1. Moreover, isolates 08168T, B05.10T and XN-1T infected by BcPV2 in the horizontal transmission experiment showed a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in pathogenicity on tobacco, compared to their parents (08168, B05.10, XN-1). This result suggests that BcPV2 is closely associated with hypovirulence of B. cinerea. Previous studies have reported several mycoviruses-infected hypovirulent isolates in B. cinerea, including CanBc-1 (infested with BcMV1), CCg378 (infested with BfPV1), BerBc-1 (infested with BcRV1), Ecan17-2 (infested with BcMyV1), and HBtom-372 (infested with BcFV1 and BcHV1) [9,23,27,28,31,32]. QT5-19 grew almost as rapidly as 08168, B05.10 and XN-1 on PDA at 20 °C, but failed to produce conidia and sclerotia. These cultural features differ from those in CanBc-1, Ecan17-2, and HBtom-372, which grew slowly on PDA [23], and from those of BerBc-1, which grew rapidly and formed sclerotia on PDA [32]. Moreover, the BcPV2-transfected isolates 08168T, B05.10T, and XN-1T also showed vigorous growth on PDA and the defect in production of conidia and sclerotia. These results suggest that BcPV2 in QT5-19 as well as in 08168T, B05.10T, and XN-1T may have no negative effect on vegetative growth of these isolates of B. cinerea; however, it has attenuation effects on pathogenicity, as well as on production of conidia and sclerotia. Further transcriptomic analysis of the isogenic BcPV2-free and BcPV2-infected isolates is necessary to determine the BcPV2-responsive genes associated with (or responsible for) pathogenicity, and production of conidia and sclerotia in B. cinerea.
The viruses in the family Partitiviridae have been reported in fungi as well as in plants and protozoa [13]. There are at least five genera in this family, namely Alphapartitivirus, Betapartitivirus, Cryspovirus, Gammapartitivirus and Deltapartitivirus according to the recent report in ICTV (https://talk.ictvonline.org). Previous studies showed that most mycoviruses in Partitiviridae have no deleterious effects on their fungal hosts [4] and only a few partitiviruses were found to be associated with abnormal phenotypes in fungi. For example, Rhizoctonia solani partitivirus 2 (RsPV2) is closely associated with hypovirulence in Rhizoctonia solani, the causal agent of rice sheath blight [47]. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum partitivirus 1 (SsPV1) can confer hypovirulence in S. sclerotiorum and related species [48]. Two partitiviruses, namely Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 1 (BcPV1) and Botryotinia fuckeliana partitivirus 1 (BfPV1), have been reported in B. cinerea [31,34]. BcPV1 was found to be associated with hypovirulence of B. cinerea [31], whereas the effect of BfPV1 on pathogenicity of B. cinerea remains unknown. Moreover, Xiao and colleagues (2014) reported that introduction of the virus particles of SsPV1 to B. cinerea caused decrease in mycelial growth and pathogenicity of B. cinerea, but caused increase in conidial production by this fungus [48]. Phylogenetic analysis in this study showed that BcPV2 is a unique member in Alphapartitivirus and it is phylogenetically distant from BcPV1 in Betapartitivirus, SsPV1 in Betapartitivirus, and BfPV1 in Gammapartitivirus. The close association between BcPV2 infection and hypovirulence observed in this study provides an example of Alphapartitivirus-mediated hypovirulence in B. cinerea.
As mentioned above, QT5-19 infected with BcPV2 hardly infected tobacco and six other crops. BcPV2 in QT5-19 was successfully transmitted to three other isolates of B. cinerea (08168, B05.10, XN-1) through hyphal contact (possibly through anastomosis). The resulting derivatives B05.10T, XN-1T, and 08168T infested with BcPV2 grew rapidly on PDA at 20 °C, but failed to produce conidia and sclerotia. These results suggest that BcPV2 in B05.10T, XN-1T and 08168T has a significant attenuation effect on the formation of conidia and sclerotia. However, the pathogenicity test showed that B05.10T, XN-1T, and 08168T could infect tobacco and caused formation of necrotic leaf lesions (Figure 10), although the average leaf lesion diameters caused by these BcPV2-infected derivatives were significantly (p < 0.05) smaller than those caused by their parents (reduced by 27% to 39%). This result suggests that BcPV2 in QT5-19 may have a larger pathogenicity-attenuation effect than it does in B05.10T, XN-1T, and 08168T. Different genetic backgrounds in isolates QT5-19, B05.10T, XN-1T and 08168T might be responsible for this phenomenon.
Previous studies showed that it is difficult to use the RNA mycoviruses such as BcMV1, BcFV1, BcHV1, BcRV1, and BcMyV1 in the corresponding hypovirulent isolates to control virulent isolates of B. cinerea [9,23,28,32]. There are two possible reasons: (i) limited horizontal transmissibility of the mycoviruses possibly due to hyphal incompatibility between the mycoviruses-infected hypovirulent isolates and virulent isolates; and (ii) low competitiveness of the mycoviruses-infected hypovirulent isolates due to poor mycelial growth. The hypovirulent isolate QT5-19 grew almost as rapidly as the virulent isolates 08168, B05.10, and XN-1 on PDA, suggesting that it may have a strong competitive ability. Meanwhile, BcPV2 in QT5-19 (donor) was successfully transmitted to four of the five investigated recipient isolates, suggesting that BcPV2 in QT5-19 may have a wider horizontal transmission spectrum than the mycoviruses reported in previous studies [9,23,28,32]. Therefore, QT5-19 with BcPV2 may have potential to be exploited as a biocontrol agent against virulent individuals of B. cinerea. Additional studies on evaluation of the biocontrol efficacy of QT5-19 are warranted.
In conclusion, this study found that the hypovirulent isolate QT5-10 of B. cinerea has distinct cultural characteristics (rapid mycelial growth, but with defects in formation of conidia and sclerotia). A novel partitivirus in Alphapartitivirus, Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 2 (BcPV2), was identified in QT5-19. BcPV2 was successfully transmitted from QT5-19 to virulent isolates 08168, B05.10, and XN-1, and the resulting BcPV2-transfected derivatives were attenuated both in pathogenicity and in production of conidia and sclerotia.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/11/1/24/s1, Figure S1: Phenotypic and molecular characterization of bikaverin biosynthesis in the pink-colored isolate QT5-19 of Botrytis cinerea (A) Difference between QT5-19 and B05.10 in accumulation of the pink pigment on potato dextrose agar (20 °C) (B) RT-PCR detection of expression of the genes (bcbik1 to bcbik6) responsible for biosynthesis of the pink pigment bikaverin. The primers for related genes used in RT-PCR are listed in Table S1. (C) A schematic diagram showing the bikaverin-biosynthesis gene cluster in isolates QT5-19 and B05.10. The gray-colored region indicates the absence of bcbik1 in B05.10. Arrows indicate the direction of gene transcription. Figure S2: Alignment of the partial nucleotide sequences of bcbik1 coding for polyketide synthase (PKS) in isolates QT5-19 and 1750 of Botrytis cinerea, and the homologs of bcbik1 in Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium anthophilum. Figure S3: Pathogenicity of isolates QT5-19 and B05.10 of B. cinerea on fruits of tomato, table grape and apple, and on leaves of cucumber, rapeseed and strawberry. Figure S4: A schematic diagram showing the strategy for cDNA cloning of the full-length sequences of the two dsRNAs in Botrytis cinerea partitivirus 2 (BcPV2). Figure S5: Northern-blotting detection of the dsRNAs extracted from the mycelia of Botrytis cinerea QT5-19. Figure S6: Detection of BcPV2 in different isolates of Botrytis cinerea by dsRNA profiling and RT-PCR. Table S1: List of the oligonucleotide primers or adaptor used in this study. Table S2: List of partitiviruses for multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis.
Author Contributions
M.K. conceived and designed the experiments; M.K. and G.H. performed the experiments; M.K., M.W., J.Z., G.L., and L.Y. analyzed the data; M.K., G.L., and W.C. wrote the paper.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31772212) and the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest (Grant No. 201303025).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Ghabrial S.A., Suzuki N. Viruses of plant pathogenic fungi. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2009;47:353–384. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pearson M.N., Beever R.E., Boine B., Arthur K. Mycoviruses of filamentous fungi and their relevance to plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009;10:115–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00503.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Herrero N., Márquez S.S., Zabalgogeazcoa I. Mycoviruses are common among different species of endophytic fungi of grasses. Arch. Virol. 2009;154:327–330. doi: 10.1007/s00705-008-0293-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ghabrial S.A., Castón J.R., Jiang D., Nibert M.L., Suzuki N. 50-plus years of fungal viruses. Virology. 2015;479:356–368. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xie J., Jiang D. New insights into mycoviruses and exploration for the biological control of crop fungal diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014;52:45–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-050222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang S., Kondo H., Liu L., Guo L., Qiu D. A novel virus in the family Hypoviridae from the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Virus Res. 2013;174:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martínez-Álvarez P., Vainio E.J., Botella L., Hantula J., Diez J.J. Three mitovirus strains infecting a single isolate of Fusarium circinatum are the first putative members of the family Narnaviridae detected in a fungus of the genus Fusarium. Arch. Virol. 2014;159:2153–2155. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Donaire L., Pagán I., Ayllón M.A. Characterization of Botrytis cinerea negative-stranded RNA virus 1, a new mycovirus related to plant viruses, and a reconstruction of host pattern evolution in negative-sense ssRNA viruses. Virology. 2016;499:212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2016.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hao F., Wu M., Li G. Molecular characterization and geographic distribution of a Mymonavirus in the population of Botrytis cinerea. Viruses. 2018;10:432. doi: 10.3390/v10080432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kondo H., Chiba S., Toyoda K., Suzuki N. Evidence for negative-strand RNA virus infection in fungi. Virology. 2013;435:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang L., He H., Wang S., Chen X., Qiu D., Kondo H., Guo L. Evidence for a novel negative-stranded RNA mycovirus isolated from the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Virology. 2018;518:232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2018.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu L., Xie J., Cheng J., Fu Y., Li G., Yi X., Jiang D. Fungal negative-stranded RNA virus that is related to bornaviruses and nyaviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:12205–12210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401786111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nibert M.L., Ghabrial S.A., Maiss E., Lesker T., Vainio E.J., Jiang D., Suzuki N. Taxonomic reorganization of family Partitiviridae and other recent progress in partitivirus research. Virus Res. 2014;188:128–141. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nibert M.L., Tang J., Xie J., Collier A.M., Ghabrial S.A., Baker T.S., Tao Y.J. 3D structures of fungal partitiviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 2013;86:59–85. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394315-6.00003-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dean R., Van Kan J.A., Pretorius Z.A., Hammond-Kosack K.E., Di Pietro A., Spanu P.D., Rudd J.J., Dickman M., Kahmann R., Ellis J. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012;13:414–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Williamson B., Tudzynski B., Tudzynski P., van Kan J.A. Botrytis cinerea: The cause of grey mould disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007;8:561–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Elad Y., Pertot I., Marina A., Prado A.M., Stewart A. Plant Hosts of Botrytis spp. In: Fillinger S., Elad Y., editors. Botrytis-The Fungus, the Pathogen and Its Management in Agricultural Systems. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2016. pp. 413–486. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fernández-Ortuño D., Chen F., Schnabel G. Resistance to pyraclostrobin and boscalid in Botrytis cinerea isolates from strawberry fields in the Carolinas. Plant Dis. 2012;96:1198–1203. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-11-1049-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Choquer M., Fournier E., Kunz C., Levis C., Pradier J.M., Simon A., Viaud M. Botrytis cinerea virulence factors: New insights into a necrotrophic and polyphageous pathogen. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007;277:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00930.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Howitt R.L., Beever R.E., Pearson M.N., Forster R.L. Presence of double-stranded RNA and virus-like particles in Botrytis cinerea. Mycol. Res. 1995;99:1472–1478. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80795-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Howitt R.L., Beever R.E., Pearson M.N., Forster R.L. Genome characterization of Botrytis virus F, a flexuous rod-shaped mycovirus resembling plant ‘potex-like’viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2001;82:67–78. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-82-1-67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Howitt R., Beever R., Pearson M., Forster R. Genome characterization of a flexuous rod-shaped mycovirus, Botrytis virus X, reveals high amino acid identity to genes from plant ‘potex-like’viruses. Arch. Virol. 2006;151:563–579. doi: 10.1007/s00705-005-0621-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu M., Zhang L., Li G., Jiang D., Hou M., Huang H.C. Hypovirulence and double-stranded RNA in Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology. 2007;97:1590–1599. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-12-1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wu M., Zhang L., Li G., Jiang D., Ghabrial S.A. Genome characterization of a debilitation-associated mitovirus infecting the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Virology. 2010;406:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rodríguez-García C., Medina V., Alonso A., Ayllón M. Mycoviruses of Botrytis cinerea isolates from different hosts. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2014;164:46–61. doi: 10.1111/aab.12073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Donaire L., Rozas J., Ayllón M.A. Molecular characterization of Botrytis ourmia-like virus, a mycovirus close to the plant pathogenic genus Ourmiavirus. Virology. 2016;489:158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hao F., Zhou Z., Wu M., Li G. Molecular characterization of a novel endornavirus from the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Arch. Virol. 2017;162:313–316. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-3106-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hao F., Ding T., Wu M., Zhang J., Yang L., Chen W., Li G. Two novel hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses in the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea: Molecular characterization and suppression of infection cushion formation. Viruses. 2018;10:254. doi: 10.3390/v10050254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Castro M., Kramer K., Valdivia L., Ortiz S., Castillo A. A double-stranded RNA mycovirus confers hypovirulence-associated traits to Botrytis cinerea. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003;228:87–91. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00755-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Castro M., Kramer K., Valdivia L., Ortiz S., Benavente J., Castillo A. A new double-stranded RNA mycovirus from Botrytis cinerea. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999;175:95–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13606.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Potgieter C.A., Castillo A., Castro M., Cottet L., Morales A. A wild-type Botrytis cinerea strain co-infected by double-stranded RNA mycoviruses presents hypovirulence-associated traits. Virol. J. 2013;10:220–228. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-10-220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yu L., Sang W., Wu M.D., Zhang J., Yang L., Zhou Y.J., Chen W.D., Li G.Q. Novel hypovirulence-associated RNA mycovirus in the plant-pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea: Molecular and biological characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:2299–2310. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03992-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.De Guido M., Minafra A., Santomauro A., Pollastro S., De Miccolis Angelini R., Faretra F. Molecular characterization of mycoviruses from Botryotinia fuckeliana. J. Plant Pathol. 2005;87:293. [Google Scholar]
- 34.De Guido M., Minafra A., Santomauro A., Faretra F. Molecular characterization of mycoviruses in Botryotinia fuckeliana; Proceedings of the 14th International Botrytis Symposium Abstract Book; Cape Town, South Africa. 2007; p. 40. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wu M., Jin F., Zhang J., Yang L., Jiang D., Li G. Characterization of a novel bipartite double-stranded RNA mycovirus conferring hypovirulence in the pytopathogenic fungus Botrytis porri. J. Virol. 2012;86:6605–6619. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00292-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fan X., Zhang J., Yang L., Wu M., Chen W., Li G. Development of PCR-based assays for detecting and differentiating three species of Botrytis infecting broad bean. Plant Dis. 2015;99:691–698. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-14-0701-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhou Y., Li N., Yang J., Yang L., Wu M., Chen W., Li G., Zhang J. Contrast between orange and black colored sclerotial isolates of Botrytis cinerea: Melanogenesis and ecological fitness. Plant Dis. 2018;102:428–436. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-16-1663-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Büttner P., Koch F., Voigt K., Quidde T., Risch S., Blaich R., Brückner B., Tudzynski P. Variations in ploidy among isolates of Botrytis cinerea: Implications for genetic and molecular analyses. Curr. Genet. 1994;25:445–450. doi: 10.1007/BF00351784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li G., Wang D., Huang H., Zhou Q. Polymorphisms of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolated from eggplant in Jiamusi, Heilongjiang Province. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 1996;26:237–242. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fan L., Jing Z., Long Y. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Botrytis cinerea strain RoseBc-3. J. Huazhong Agri. Uni. 2013;32:30–35. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yu Q.Y. Master’s Thesis. Huazhong Agricultural University; Wuhan, China: 2007. Functional Analysis of Autophage-Related Genes Bcatg26, Bcatg17 and Bcatg14 in Botrytis cinerea. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang L., Wu D.M., Li G.Q., Jiang D.H., Huang H.C. Effect of mitovirus infection on formation of infection cushions and virulence of Botrytis cinerea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010;75:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2010.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schumacher J., Gautier A., Morgant G., Studt L., Ducrot P.-H., Le Pecheur P., Azeddine S., Fillinger S., Leroux P., Tudzynski B., et al. A functional bikaverin biosynthesis gene cluster in rare strains of Botrytis cinerea is positively controlled by VELVET. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e53729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu M., Deng Y., Zhou Z., He G., Chen W., Li G. Characterization of three mycoviruses co-infecting the plant pathogenic fungus Sclerotinia nivalis. Virus Res. 2016;223:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mathews D.H., Disney M.D., Childs J.L., Schroeder S.J., Zuker M., Turner D.H. Incorporating chemical modification constraints into a dynamic programming algorithm for prediction of RNA secondary structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:7287–7292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401799101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zheng L., Zhang M., Chen Q., Zhu M., Zhou E. A novel mycovirus closely related to viruses in the genus Alphapartitivirus confers hypovirulence in the phytopathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Virology. 2014;456:220–226. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Xiao X., Cheng J., Tang J., Fu Y., Jiang D., Baker T.S., Ghabrial S.A., Xie J. A novel partitivirus that confers hypovirulence on plant pathogenic fungi. J. Virol. 2014;88:10120–10133. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01036-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.