Table 2.
n | PZ | MNP | TZ | CONTROL | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 HCC at endline, pg/mg | ||||||
Minimally adjusted model | 512 | 14.3 (12.5; 16.4) | 13.3 (11.6; 15.3) | 16.1 (14.0; 18.4) | 13.6 (11.8; 15.6) | 0.231 |
Fully adjusted model | 499 | 13.6 (11.8; 15.6) | 13.1 (11.4; 15.1) | 15.9 (13.8; 18.3) | 13.7 (11.9; 15.9) | 0.260 |
3 Change in HCC, pg/mg | ||||||
Minimally adjusted model | 512 | −8.9 (−11.2; −6.6) | −7.8 (−10.2; −5.4) | −5.0 (−7.4; −2.6) | −7.8 (−10.2; −5.4) | 0.121 |
Fully adjusted model | 499 | −9.4 (−11.7; −7.0) | −7.7 (−10.1; −5.4) | −4.6 (−7.0; −2.3) | −7.2 (−9.7; −4.8) | 0.078 |
1 Estimates are means (95% CI). ANCOVA regression models were used to examine the difference in mean HCC at endline and the magnitude of change in HCC. Minimally adjusted: adjusted for baseline value of HCC, age, and district. Fully adjusted: Minimally adjusted + sex, LAZ, WAZ, wasting, health center and maternal marital status. HCC: Hair cortisol concentrations; MNP: micronutrient powder; PZ: preventive zinc; TZ: therapeutic zinc. 2 Results shown as geometric mean (95% CI) (HCC were log-transformed and then the estimates were back transformed using excel’s exponential function). 3 Results shown as arithmetic mean (95% CI) and change is from baseline to endline.