Publisher's Note: There is a Blood Commentary on this article in this issue.
Key Points
α-Defs accelerate fibrin polymerization, increase fiber density and branching, and impede fibrinolysis in vitro.
Transgenic mice expressing human α-def-1 developed larger and more occlusive venous clots resistant to heparin and fibrinolysis.
Abstract
Inflammation and thrombosis are integrated, mutually reinforcing processes, but the interregulatory mechanisms are incompletely defined. Here, we examined the contribution of α-defensins (α-defs), antimicrobial proteins released from activated human neutrophils, on clot formation in vitro and in vivo. Activation of the intrinsic pathway of coagulation stimulates release of α-defs from neutrophils. α-Defs accelerate fibrin polymerization, increase fiber density and branching, incorporate into nascent fibrin clots, and impede fibrinolysis in vitro. Transgenic mice (Def++) expressing human α-Def-1 developed larger, occlusive, neutrophil-rich clots after partial inferior vena cava (IVC) ligation than those that formed in wild-type (WT) mice. IVC thrombi extracted from Def++ mice were composed of a fibrin meshwork that was denser and contained a higher proportion of tightly packed compressed polyhedral erythrocytes than those that developed in WT mice. Def++ mice were resistant to thromboprophylaxis with heparin. Inhibiting activation of the intrinsic pathway of coagulation, bone marrow transplantation from WT mice or provision of colchicine to Def++ mice to inhibit neutrophil degranulation decreased plasma levels of α-defs, caused a phenotypic reversion characterized by smaller thrombi comparable to those formed in WT mice, and restored responsiveness to heparin. These data identify α-defs as a potentially important and tractable link between innate immunity and thrombosis.
Visual Abstract
Introduction
Inflammation and hemostasis or thrombosis are integrated processes.1-4 Fibrin limits dissemination of microbes during implementation of the innate and adaptive immune response.5,6 Infection, inflammation and autoimmune disorders also increase the risk of thrombosis,7-11 but the pathways that link these processes are incompletely understood.
Inflammation activates the contact pathway of coagulation by releasing bacterial and platelet polyphosphates,12,13 RNA,14 DNA,15 and sulfatides16 when blood is exposed to microbial surfaces,17 collagen,18 and neutrophil extracellular traps19 and on the surfaces of intravascular devices.20 Mice lacking individual contact factors are less susceptible to developing thrombi in these settings.21-23 Diverse approaches to impairing contact activation (eg, through the use of inhibitory antibodies to factor XIIa24 and artificial antisense oligonucleotides to factor XI25,26) have provided thromboprophylaxis without increasing blood loss in some experimental and surgical27 settings. These data suggest that novel approaches may be required to mitigate the risk of thrombosis induced by inflammatory pathways and exposed surfaces.
Neutrophils, a principal component of the innate immune system, contribute to the increased risk, severity, and adverse outcome of thrombosis,28,29 including stroke,30-33 by contributing to the rupture of atherosclerotic plaque (reviewed by Soehnlein34), promoting platelet activation,35 possible carriage of tissue factor,36,37 impairing the antithrombotic function of the endothelium,36,38-40 and impeding the response to fibrinolytics,41 among other processes. A dose-dependent relationship between activated neutrophils, circulating nucleosomes, and development of deep vein thrombosis has been noted.42
Human neutrophil α-defensins (α-defs) comprise a family of four closely related peptides that constitute >5% of the total protein stored in azurophilic granules.43 The plasma concentration of α-defs rises from <15 nM in healthy individuals to as high as 50 μM after acute bacterial infection as a result of neutrophil activation.44 There is a correlation between plasma concentrations of α-defs and the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality.45-47 α-Defs bind to endothelium and vascular smooth muscle cells,48,49 deposit in atherosclerotic human coronary and carotid arteries,48,50 promote platelet activation,51,52 inhibit tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA)–mediated fibrinolysis in vitro,53 impair lipoprotein metabolism,54 and alter vascular reactivity,55 but their involvement in thrombosis in vivo has not been established.
Investigation into the potential role of α-defs in vascular disorders such as thrombosis has been limited by the fact that unlike in humans, murine neutrophils lack these peptides.56,57 Here, we investigated the role of α-defs both in fibrin formation and stability in vitro and in the pathogenesis of thrombosis in transgenic mice expressing α-Def-1, which comprises 70% of human neutrophil α-defs. The results show that α-defs released from human neutrophils upon activation of the contact pathway of coagulation accelerate clot formation and generate compact clots with enhanced resistance to fibrinolysis in vitro and induce heparin resistance and propagate thrombus formation in vivo. Inhibition of α-def synthesis or release causes phenotypic reversion and restores responsiveness to heparin.
Methods
Materials
Recombinant tPA and dabigatran were purchased from Boehringer Ingelheim (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany); bovine serum albumin, Tris, kaolin, and prekallikrein were from Sigma (Saint Louis, MO); tissue factor was from Perrigo (Dublin, Ireland); thrombin was from Ilex (Petah Tekva, Israel), Omrix (Jerusalem, Israel), and Sigma; rivaroxaban was from Bayer (Whippany, NJ); aprotinin was from Kamada (Peit Kama, Israel); prekallekrein-deficient plasma was from Technoclone (Vienna, Austria); and colchicine was from Rafa (Jerusalem, Israel). Active factors, XII, XI, and IX were from Kordia (Leiden, the Netherlands). Plasminogen was purified from human plasma using a tranexamic acid column from Omrix or American Diagnostica (Greenwich, CT).
Animal studies
All studies were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the institutional animal care and use committees of the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Measurements of the concentrations of α-defs in human plasmas and sera
The concentrations of α-defs in human and transgenic mouse plasmas and sera were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously.54 See supplemental Methods (available on the Blood Web site) for experimental details.
α-Def-1 sources and radiolabeling
Two sources of α-Def-1 were employed. α-Def-1 was purchased from Peptide Institute (Osaka City, Japan). α-Def-1 was also kindly provided by Dr. Wuyan Lu (University of Maryland School of Medicine). α-Def-1 was radiolabeled with 125I as reported previously.48 See supplemental Methods for experimental details.
Binding of 125I-α-def to fibrin(ogen)
Binding of α-Def-1 to fibrinogen and fibrin was measured as described previously.48 See supplemental Methods for experimental details.
Dynamic clot turbidity
Clotting of purified fibrinogen was initiated by adding thrombin and CaCl2 in the presence or absence of α-Def-1. Fibrin formation was evaluated by monitoring the change in optical density (turbidity) at absorbance at 405 nm (A405). See supplemental Methods for experimental details.
Rate of fibrinolysis
Fibrin clots were formed as described above, but the A405 was monitored for up to 4.5 hours. Plasminogen was added to the fibrinogen before addition of thrombin and either tPA or urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) in the presence or absence of α-Def-1. Because the turbidities were far higher in the presence of α-Def-1, data were normalized based on maximal turbidity. See supplemental Methods for experimental details.
Isolation of neutrophils
Neutrophils were isolated58,59 and kept on ice until use.60 See supplemental Methods for experimental details.
Immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy of fibrin clots
Hydrated fibrin clots formed in the presence or absence of α-Def-1 as described above were stained with an Alexa Fluor 568–conjugated anti-human fibrin mouse monoclonal antibody. Z-stacked images of immunolabeled fibrin networks were taken using a Zeiss LSM 710 laser scanning confocal microscope. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, and maximal projection is shown. See supplemental Methods for experimental details.
Scanning electron microscopy
Fibrin clots formed in the absence or presence of α-Def-1 were washed, fixed, dehydrated, and sputter coated with gold-palladium as described previously.61 Triplicate samples were examined using an FEI Quanta FEG250 scanning electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR). See supplemental Methods for experimental details.
Venous thrombosis in Def++ mice
To study venous thrombosis, partial inferior vena cava (IVC) occlusion was performed62 using a model that combines external compression with a reduction in blood flow. In some experiments, the effect of IV heparin on clot formation was determined. See supplemental Methods for experimental details.
Effect of neutrophil depletion, inhibition and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on venous thrombosis in Def++ mice
Partial IVC occlusion was performed as described previously.62 In some experiments, mice were depleted of neutrophils63 or were given colchicine in their drinking water to inhibit neutrophil degranulation54 before IVC occlusion. In other experiments, bone marrow from male Def++ mice or wild-type (WT) mice was transplanted into 6- to 8-week-old irradiated syngeneic male WT mice or bone marrow from WT mice was transplanted into Def++ mice.54 See supplemental Methods for additional details.
Statistical analysis
Group comparisons was performed using the Student t test or 1-way analysis of variance with the Newman-Keuls post hoc test.54,64 Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney rank test and 2-way analysis of variance with the Newman-Keuls post hoc test.64 Statistical significance was set at P < .05.
Results
Release of α-defs during blood coagulation in vitro
We first asked whether α-defs are released during clotting of whole blood in vitro. The concentrations of α-defs was over an order of magnitude higher in sera than in plasma of healthy volunteers (584 ± 85 nM vs 18 ± 3 nM, respectively; n = 10, P < .001) (Figure 1A), indicating that α-defs are released during blood coagulation in vitro.
Release of α-defs is mediated by plasma kallikrein through activation of the contact factor pathway
Plasma kallikrein stimulates release of neutrophil elastase from azurophilic granules,65 where α-defs are stored.66 Therefore, we asked whether the contact factors, including kallikrein, are also responsible for releasing α-defs from neutrophils.67 Clotting of blood collected into a glass vacutainer was initiated in the absence of an anticoagulant to activate the contact pathway or by adding thrombin to bypass the contact pathway. Activating the contact pathway increased serum α-defs (530 ± 62 nM), whereas thrombin did not (22 ± 7 nM; Figure 1B). Identical results were obtained using each of the 4 sources of thrombin. Clotting initiated by adding kaolin increased α-defs in sera to the same extent (891.5 ± 162.3 nM). Release of α-defs by kaolin was inhibited by 400 KIU/mL aprotinin68 and 50 µg/mL corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI), suggesting a role for factor XIIa (FXIIa) as well69 (Figure 1C), and was proportional to the amount of kallikrein generated (supplemental Figure 1A-B), consistent with activation of the contact factor pathway. On the other hand, clotting initiated by 5 pM tissue factor did not affect α-def release (19 ± 13 nM) (Figure 1C; supplemental Figure 1B). The thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban delayed clotting but did not inhibit release of α-defs by kaolin (data not shown). Coagulation initiated by tissue factor (0.2 nM) to back-activate the contact factor pathway and generate additional kallikrein caused a small added increase in α-def release that was susceptible to inhibition by CTI (supplemental Figure 1B).
As an independent approach, neutrophils isolated from a healthy donor were added to autologous or prekallikrein-deficient plasma, and coagulation was initiated with kaolin. α-Defs were only released in the presence of endogenous or added prekallikrein (298 ± 34 nM) (Figure 1D). α-Defs were also released from isolated human neutrophils incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C with purified FXIIa plus prekallikrein, which was inhibited by CTI and aprotinin, but release was not induced by prekallikrein alone or FXIIa, FXIa, FVIIa, and FXa alone in the presence or absence of prekallikrein (Figure 1E). Identical results were seen in whole blood (supplemental Figure 2). In contrast to the effect of zymogen-activated serum, kallikrein did not cause the release of myeloperoxidase in parallel with α-defs.54 These data indicate that activation of the contact pathway initiates release of α-defs from neutrophils during clot formation.
Incorporation of α-defs into fibrin clots
We next asked whether α-defs released during clot formation are incorporated into the fibrin network. As a first approach, 125I-α-Def-1 (7.5 μM final concentration) was added to a solution of fibrinogen (3 mg/mL), and clotting was initiated by thrombin (0.033 U/mL). Clots were separated by centrifugation, and radioactivity in the clots and supernatants was measured. Approximately 90% of the radiolabeled α-Def-1 was associated with the clot (Figure 1F). We then measured the concentration of α-defs in clots formed in human blood activated by kaolin or thrombin and then released by adding tPA and plasminogen. The concentration of α-defs released from lysed blood clots formed by activating the contact pathway was 14.4 ± 1.9 μM compared with 1.1 ± 0.4 μM released from clots formed by adding thrombin (P < .05) (Figure 1G).
Effect of α-Def-1 on clot formation in vitro
We next asked whether α-defs modulate fibrin formation, structure, and susceptibility to lysis. α-Def-1 increased the rate of fibrin polymerization assessed by dynamic clot turbidity and altered fibrin structure assessed by increased maximal clot turbidity in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2A-B). α-Def-1 also shortened the lag time to clot formation in a dose-dependent manner (7.0 ± 0.2, 1.5 ± 0.2, 3.1 ± 0.2, and <2.5 minutes in the presence of 0, 1, 2.5, and 5.0 µM α-Def-1, respectively). The same effect was observed when supernatants from isolated neutrophils activated by 100 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate or FXIIa plus prekallikrein were added instead of purified α-Def-1 (supplemental Figure 3A-B). Release of α-defs by neutrophils was not induced by FXIIa alone, when cells were stimulated in the presence of CTI or aprotinin (supplemental Figure 3A-B), or by the presence of 3 mg/mL fibrinogen (data not shown).
We next asked whether α-defs enhance clot formation by stimulating thrombin activity or whether the effects of α-defs are mediated through binding to fibrin(ogen). α-Def-1 (2 µM) did not stimulate the amidolytic activity of thrombin but rather exerted a slight inhibition at higher concentrations (10 µM) (Figure 2C). Little 125I-α-Def-1 bound directly to fibrinogen as assessed by gel filtration, whereas 92.3% of the radioactivity was found in the eluted fractions that contained soluble fibrin (Figure 2D). Together, these data suggest that α-defs accelerate fibrin formation primarily by interacting with intermediate fibrin oligomers.
Effect of α-Def-1 on clot structure in vitro
We then studied the effect of α-defs on the final structure of the fibrin network using confocal microscopy. In the presence of 5 µM α-Def-1, fibrin formed spatially nonhomogenous networks in which areas of dense and highly branched fibers were interspersed with large pores (Figure 3A). Scanning electron microscopy revealed that α-Def-1 caused bundling, entanglement, and partial conglutination of fibrin fibers resulting in the formation of a nonisotropic fibrin network with areas of accumulation and entanglement of the fibers (Figure 3B).
Effect of α-Def-1 on fibrinolysis in vitro
Based on these changes in fibrin structure, we assessed the impact of α-defs on tPA-induced lysis of fibrin made from purified fibrinogen in the presence of plasminogen. The time to attain 50% lysis of the fibrin clots was prolonged in the presence of increasing concentrations of α-Def-1 (Figure 4A-B). Notably, lysis was incomplete, with large pieces of fibrin remaining even after a 3-hour exposure to tPA. The amount of residual lysis-resistant fibrin was roughly proportional to the concentration of α-Def-1 (Figure 4C). The same inhibitory effect on fibrinolysis was obtained by adding supernatants from purified neutrophils activated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate or FXIIa plus prekallikrein, but not by using FXIIa or prekallikrein alone, and the effect was prevented by CTI (supplemental Figure 4A). Fibrinolysis mediated by tPA, but not uPA, is inhibited when α-defs were added to preformed clots.59 In contrast, uPA-mediated lysis was blocked when α-def was added during clot formation together with plasminogen and uPA (supplemental Figure 4B). These results support the conclusion that α-defs bind to nascent fibrin (Figure 1F-G; supplemental Figure 5), altering its structure (Figure 3A-B) and susceptibility to lysis (Figure 4A-C; supplemental Figure 4A-B).
α-Def release and effect on fibrin formation and lysis ex vivo
The addition of kaolin to blood from transgenic mice (Def++) that expresses human α-Def-1 in their neutrophils56 increased the plasma concentration of α-defs from 15 ± 3 nM to 94 ± 7 nM, which was prevented by CTI and aprotinin (supplemental Figure 1). Over 90% of the α-defs released were incorporated into fibrin during clot formation (supplemental Figure 5), as seen with human blood (Figure 1G). Blood from Def++ mice clotted more rapidly, and the clots took longer to lyse (as assessed by thromboelastography) than did clots formed using blood from WT mice that do not express α-defs (Figure 5A) (R value in WT and Def++ mice, 7.4 ± 0.7 and 4.6 ± 0.6 min, respectively; n = 13 per group; P < .05). Rapid clotting in Def++ mice was preceded by an increase in α-defs in the media detected 3 minutes after the addition of kaolin (data not shown).
Prothrombotic effects of α-defs in vivo
We then compared outcomes in the IVC stasis model of thrombosis in Def++ and WT mice. Plasma levels of α-Def-1 rose from 17 ± 1 nM to 66 ± 5 nM after IVC occlusion in Def++ mice (n = 23; P < .05), and the clot content of α-defs was 1.44 ± 0.16 µM, which is comparable to the incorporation of α-defs in vitro (supplemental Figure 5). Every Def++ mouse developed IVC thrombi compared with 44% of WT mice (n = 13, P < .05). Clots formed in Def++ mice were overtly larger than those formed in WT mice based on their appearance in situ (Figure 5C) and visual inspection postextraction (Figure 5D-E). IVC thrombi formed in Def++ mice weighed on average ∼10-fold more than clots formed in WT mice (Figure 5D-E) (29.3 ± 3.5 vs 3.5 ± 0.6 mg; P < .001) and contained more neutrophils (591 ± 93 vs 86 ± 24 cells per field, P < .05) (Figure 5D), consistent with findings by others that α-defs promote neutrophil migration.70 Scanning electron microscopy of the fibrin meshwork of thrombi extracted from Def++ mice showed more fibrin on the clot surface (Figure 5F, a, red arrows) than was seen in thrombi removed from WT mice (Figure 5F, b), and they contained a higher proportion of tightly packed compressed polyhedral red blood cells (polyhedrocytes) within their interiors (Figure 5F, c, blue arrows), a morphologic signature of platelet-driven clot contraction,61 compared with thrombi from WT mice (Figure 5F, d).
Phenotypic conversion by preventing α-Def-1 release
We previously reported that addition of colchicine to the drinking water of Def++ mice prevented neutrophil degranulation, lowered the plasma level of α-Def-1, and prevented their pathological effect on lipoprotein metabolism.54 Therefore, we next compared thrombus development in Def++ mice given colchicine or saline in their drinking water for 2 weeks prior to inducing IVC stenosis. Pretreatment with colchicine decreased levels α-Def-1 in the circulation of Def++ mice (Figure 6A) concomitant with a decrease in the size of clots that developed in the IVC (Figure 6B), with no comparable effect on clot size in WT mice (supplemental Figure 6A-B). The fibrin network on the surface of the thrombi extracted from Def++ mice given colchicine was less dense (Figure 6C, c), and there were fewer tightly packed polyhedrocytes within the clot interior, as viewed by scanning electron microscopy (Figure 6C, d), than in thrombi from untreated animals (Figure 6C, a and b, respectively). Depletion of neutrophils in Def++ mice diminished clot size to that seen in WT mice without affecting clot size in WT mice (supplemental Figure 6A-B). Clot size was also decreased in Def++ mice given CTI prior to stenosis (supplemental Figures 7 and 8).
We also previously reported that transplanting bone marrow from WT mice into Def++ mice prevented formation of α-Def-1/low-density lipoprotein complexes and the development of early atherogenic changes in aortic roots in animals on a normal chow diet, whereas the converse was true when WT mice were transplanted with bone marrow from Def++ mice.54 Therefore, we used crosstransplantation as an independent method to assess the effect of α-Def-1 on IVC thrombosis. Plasma levels of α-Def-1 in WT mice transplanted with Def++ marrow reached levels seen in Def++ mice by week 4 posttransplant (15.8 ± 2.0 nM in transplanted mice vs 16.7 ± 1.3 nM in Def++ mice). Conversely, α-Def-1 became undetectable in the plasma of Def++ mice transplanted with WT BM by this time (Figure 6A). Concomitant with the rise in plasma α-Def-1, WT mice transplanted with Def++ BM developed clots similar in size to those seen in Def++ mice (Figure 6B), whereas IVC thrombi in Def++ mice transplanted with WT bone marrow were similar to those seen in WT mice (Figure 6B).
Resistance to heparin
Addition of α-defs to blood activated by kaolin attenuated the prolongation in clot time (R value) caused by heparin as measured by thromboelastography (Figure 5A). Therefore, we next asked whether endogenous release of α-Def-1 impaired the antithrombotic effectiveness of heparin in vivo. An IV bolus of saline or increasing doses of heparin or colchicine (or both) were given 1 hour after the onset of IVC stenosis and every 12 hours thereafter, and clot size was measured at 72 hours. Def++ mice required ∼20-fold more heparin than WT mice (200 U/kg vs 10 mg/kg, P < .05) to prevent clot formation (Figure 7A). IV colchicine given every 12 hours decreased clot size (Figure 7B), and coadministration with heparin reduced the dose of heparin required to prevent IVC thrombosis by ∼20-fold (200 mg/kg vs 10 mg/kg, P < .05) (Figure 7A-B) without increasing tail vein bleeding times (8.1 vs 8.2 min) (Figure 7C) or extravasation of hemoglobin following transection (0.41 vs 0.44 mg%) (Figure 7D). When Def++ mice were given a subtherapeutic dose of colchicine (0.1 mg/kg) combined with an “ineffective” dose of heparin (10 U/kg), thrombus size was reduced on average by 60% (P < .05) (Figure 7E) without an increase in tail bleeding (Figure 7E).
Discussion
Inflammation and thrombosis are closely linked processes. Fibrin contributes to the innate immune response by impeding tissue invasion by microbial pathogens,71,72 providing a provisional matrix to direct initially neutrophils and later macrophages to their targets, and stimulating cytokine release from leukocytes,73 among other impacts on the host response.74 The multiplicity of processes associated with “inflammatory thrombosis” includes pathways that are not directly responsive to antithrombotic management directed at the extrinsic pathway and generation of thrombin.2 Rapid recruitment of neutrophils to sites of thrombosis as the result of ischemic injury contributes to impaired responsiveness to fibrinolytic therapy and reperfusion injury.75 However, the mechanisms by which neutrophils enhance clot formation and impair clot resolution are incompletely defined.
The results of this study show that neutrophil-derived α-defs promote clot formation. α-Defs, at concentrations that develop under pathological conditions bind directly to nascent fibrin. Binding of α-defs accelerates fibrin polymerization, increases fibrin mass, and impairs fibrinolysis. These effects of α-defs may contribute to their antimicrobial function by accelerating the formation and enhancing the stability of the fibrin shield that acts as an early barrier against microbial infiltration.76 Moreover, the high local concentration of α-defs released rapidly following coagulation may generate high local concentrations of antimicrobial activity that precede neutrophil migration and egress into inflamed tissue.
However, α-defs incorporated into fibrin during clotting also altered clot architecture, forming a nonhomogeneous network showing areas of densification interspersed with large pores. Bundling and entanglement of fibers lead to formation of abnormal fibrin networks that have been associated previously with a prothrombotic phenotype in a number of pathological conditions, including those with a strong inflammatory component and recruitment of neutrophils.77-80 Such changes in fibrin structure influence its susceptibility to lysis and mechanical properties.81-83 Thus, the profound effect of α-defs on clot formation in vitro and in vivo can be attributed to alterations of fibrin structure described here, as well as to the previously described inhibitory effects on tPA-mediated fibrinolysis.53,59 These data help to explain how incorporation of α-defs into clots may contribute to an increased tendency for thrombus formation and incomplete fibrinolysis that might lead to incomplete vascular recanalization.84
The effects of α-defs on clot formation were also seen in vivo. α-Def-1, the most prevalent α-def in human neutrophils, is released when clotting is initiated in a transgenic mouse. α-Def-1 transgenic mice formed dramatically larger venous thrombi than WT mice. Thrombi formed in α-Def-1–expressing mice were also more resistant to dissolution by tPA. Indeed, thrombi extracted from Def++ mice contained a high proportion of tightly packed polyhedral red blood cells (polyhedrocytes),61 as revealed by scanning electron microscopy, a morphologic signature of intense clot contraction (Figure 6). The more extensive clot contraction seen in Def++ mice might retard the diffusion of lytic enzymes and thereby increase resistance to fibrinolysis.
These observations provide a newly described link between activation of the contact factor pathway during inflammation and thrombosis, and they suggest that pharmacological inhibition of thrombin (eg, by heparin) might not suffice to prevent release of α-defs and the resultant enhancement of clot stability. In our studies, clot formation was induced in the IVC in the absence of an apparent direct activation of neutrophils. Thrombus formation itself, whether through back activation of the contact factor pathway as shown here, local hypoxia, an effect of fibrin on the prothrombotic properties of the vessel wall, or vascular release of cytokines may cause sufficient release of α-defs from neutrophils to dramatically enlarge clot mass and stability. This outcome may help to explain the incomplete response to anticoagulant and fibrinolytic agents in clots invested with neutrophils1 and suggests that inhibitors of the contact factor pathway might attenuate clot formation and hasten resolution even in the absence of overt inflammation. These results also suggest that addition of drugs that inhibit the contact factor pathway or inhibit neutrophil degranulation may enhance the efficacy of inhibitors of thrombin or FXa without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding.85
Phenotypic reversion of α-def levels in plasma and thrombus formation were induced in α-Def-1 mice by BMT from WT mice and provision of colchicine in the drinking water. Colchicine has been used safely for decades to reduce neutrophil activation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever and more recently in patients with gout, osteoarthritis, or pericarditis, and a protective effect has been seen against myocardial infarction and possibly stroke.86 Def++ mice required 20-fold more heparin to prevent IVC thrombosis than WT mice. Intravenous colchicine lowered the effective anticoagulant dose of heparin to that which was effective in WT mice, with no discernable impact on hemostasis, as assessed by tail vein bleeding time or blood loss following tail transection. Additional studies will be needed to more fully understand the effect of α-defs on clot formation and structure and determine whether colchicine or other agents that prevent neutrophil degranulation provide a useful adjunctive approach to treat or prevent thrombosis that develops in the context of neutrophil activation and systemic inflammation.
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article contains a data supplement.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Shane Lewis for measuring fibrin fiber thickness in scanning electron micrographs.
This work was supported by grants HL123912 (A.A.H. and J.W.W.), HL116916, HL142122, and HL139448 (D.B.C.), from the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; by grant 930/04 from the Israeli Science Foundation; and by the Program for Competitive Growth at Kazan Federal University.
Footnotes
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
Authorship
Contribution: A.A.-R.H. conceived the study; A.A.-R.H., R.A.-F., D.B.C., J.W.W., R.I.L., K.B., and V.S. designed experiments and analyzed data; A.A.-R.H., D.B.C., R.A.-F., J.W.W., R.I.L., and V.S. wrote the paper; R.A.-F., S.A., E.M., and M.H. performed and analyzed the experiments shown in Figures 1, 2C-D, 5, and 7A-C; and V.S., C.N., K.B., and A.R.M. performed and analyzed the experiments shown in Figures 2A-B, 3, 4, 6, and 7.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Abd Al-Roof Higazi, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 513A Stellar-Chance, 422 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104; e-mail: higazi@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
REFERENCES
- 1.Massberg S, Grahl L, von Bruehl ML, et al. . Reciprocal coupling of coagulation and innate immunity via neutrophil serine proteases. Nat Med. 2010;16(8):887-896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Engelmann B, Massberg S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(1):34-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Emmi G, Silvestri E, Squatrito D, et al. . Thrombosis in vasculitis: from pathogenesis to treatment. Thromb J. 2015;13(1):15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aksu K, Donmez A, Keser G. Inflammation-induced thrombosis: mechanisms, disease associations and management. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(11):1478-1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Esmon CT, Xu J, Lupu F. Innate immunity and coagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(Suppl 1):182-188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Prasad JM, Gorkun OV, Raghu H, et al. . Mice expressing a mutant form of fibrinogen that cannot support fibrin formation exhibit compromised antimicrobial host defense. Blood. 2015;126(17):2047-2058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Palatinus A, Adams M. Thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2009;35(7):621-629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chung WS, Peng CL, Lin CL, et al. . Rheumatoid arthritis increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(10):1774-1780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chung WS, Lin CL, Sung FC, Hsu WH, Chen YF, Kao CH. Increased risks of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in Sjögren syndrome: a nationwide cohort study. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(5):909-915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jackson SP. Arterial thrombosis–insidious, unpredictable and deadly. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1423-1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Esmon CT. Basic mechanisms and pathogenesis of venous thrombosis. Blood Rev. 2009;23(5):225-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Müller F, Mutch NJ, Schenk WA, et al. . Platelet polyphosphates are proinflammatory and procoagulant mediators in vivo. Cell. 2009;139(6):1143-1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Engel R, Brain CM, Paget J, Lionikiene AS, Mutch NJ. Single-chain factor XII exhibits activity when complexed to polyphosphate. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(9):1513-1522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kannemeier C, Shibamiya A, Nakazawa F, et al. . Extracellular RNA constitutes a natural procoagulant cofactor in blood coagulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(15):6388-6393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, et al. . Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(36):15880-15885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tans G, Rosing J, Griffin JH. Sulfatide-dependent autoactivation of human blood coagulation Factor XII (Hageman Factor). J Biol Chem. 1983;258(13):8215-8222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Long AT, Kenne E, Jung R, Fuchs TA, Renné T. Contact system revisited: an interface between inflammation, coagulation, and innate immunity. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(3):427-437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van der Meijden PE, Munnix IC, Auger JM, et al. . Dual role of collagen in factor XII-dependent thrombus formation. Blood. 2009;114(4):881-890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oehmcke S, Mörgelin M, Herwald H. Activation of the human contact system on neutrophil extracellular traps. J Innate Immun. 2009;1(3):225-230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jaffer IH, Fredenburgh JC, Hirsh J, Weitz JI. Medical device-induced thrombosis: what causes it and how can we prevent it? J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13(Suppl 1):S72-S81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Renné T, Pozgajová M, Grüner S, et al. . Defective thrombus formation in mice lacking coagulation factor XII. J Exp Med. 2005;202(2):271-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Langhauser F, Göb E, Kraft P, et al. . Kininogen deficiency protects from ischemic neurodegeneration in mice by reducing thrombosis, blood-brain barrier damage, and inflammation. Blood. 2012;120(19):4082-4092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kokoye Y, Ivanov I, Cheng Q, et al. . A comparison of the effects of factor XII deficiency and prekallikrein deficiency on thrombus formation. Thromb Res. 2016;140:118-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Larsson M, Rayzman V, Nolte MW, et al. . A factor XIIa inhibitory antibody provides thromboprotection in extracorporeal circulation without increasing bleeding risk. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(222):222ra17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Büller HR, Bethune C, Bhanot S, et al. ; FXI-ASO TKA Investigators. Factor XI antisense oligonucleotide for prevention of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(3):232-240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Büller HR, Gailani D, Weitz JI. Factor XI antisense oligonucleotide for venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(17):1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Brueckmann M, et al. ; RE-ALIGN Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1206-1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McColl BW, Rothwell NJ, Allan SM. Systemic inflammatory stimulus potentiates the acute phase and CXC chemokine responses to experimental stroke and exacerbates brain damage via interleukin-1- and neutrophil-dependent mechanisms. J Neurosci. 2007;27(16):4403-4412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Elkind MS, Cheng J, Rundek T, Boden-Albala B, Sacco RL. Leukocyte count predicts outcome after ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;13(5):220-227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Buck BH, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, et al. . Early neutrophilia is associated with volume of ischemic tissue in acute stroke. Stroke. 2008;39(2):355-360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim J, Song TJ, Park JH, et al. . Different prognostic value of white blood cell subtypes in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Atherosclerosis. 2012;222(2):464-467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Price CJS, Menon DK, Peters AM, et al. . Cerebral neutrophil recruitment, histology, and outcome in acute ischemic stroke: an imaging-based study. Stroke. 2004;35(7):1659-1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Akopov SE, Simonian NA, Grigorian GS. Dynamics of polymorphonuclear leukocyte accumulation in acute cerebral infarction and their correlation with brain tissue damage. Stroke. 1996;27(10):1739-1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Soehnlein O. Multiple roles for neutrophils in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2012;110(6):875-888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Goel MS, Diamond SL. Neutrophil cathepsin G promotes prothrombinase and fibrin formation under flow conditions by activating fibrinogen-adherent platelets. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(11):9458-9463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Darbousset R, Thomas GM, Mezouar S, et al. . Tissue factor-positive neutrophils bind to injured endothelial wall and initiate thrombus formation. Blood. 2012;120(10):2133-2143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ruf W, Ruggeri ZM. Neutrophils release brakes of coagulation. Nat Med. 2010;16(8):851-852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Glaser CB, Morser J, Clarke JH, et al. . Oxidation of a specific methionine in thrombomodulin by activated neutrophil products blocks cofactor activity. A potential rapid mechanism for modulation of coagulation. J Clin Invest. 1992;90(6):2565-2573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Diacovo TG, Puri KD, Warnock RA, Springer TA, von Andrian UH. Platelet-mediated lymphocyte delivery to high endothelial venules. Science. 1996;273(5272):252-255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Simon DI, Chen Z, Xu H, et al. . Platelet glycoprotein ibalpha is a counterreceptor for the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18). J Exp Med. 2000;192(2):193-204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Barron HV, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Braunwald E, Gibson CM. Association between white blood cell count, epicardial blood flow, myocardial perfusion, and clinical outcomes in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 10 substudy. Circulation. 2000;102(19):2329-2334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.van Montfoort ML, Stephan F, Lauw MN, et al. . Circulating nucleosomes and neutrophil activation as risk factors for deep vein thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(1):147-151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ganz T, Selsted ME, Szklarek D, et al. . Defensins. Natural peptide antibiotics of human neutrophils. J Clin Invest. 1985;76(4):1427-1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Panyutich AV, Panyutich EA, Krapivin VA, Baturevich EA, Ganz T. Plasma defensin concentrations are elevated in patients with septicemia or bacterial meningitis. J Lab Clin Med. 1993;122(2):202-207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Joseph G, Tarnow L, Astrup AS, et al. . Plasma alpha-defensin is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 1 diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(4):1470-1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vordenbäumen S, Sander O, Bleck E, Schneider M, Fischer-Betz R. Cardiovascular disease and serum defensin levels in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(3):364-370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Christensen HM, Frystyk J, Faber J, et al. . α-Defensins and outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14(4):387-394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Higazi AA, Lavi E, Bdeir K, et al. . Defensin stimulates the binding of lipoprotein (a) to human vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Blood. 1997;89(12):4290-4298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Higazi AA, Ganz T, Kariko K, Cines DB. Defensin modulates tissue-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen binding to fibrin and endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(30):17650-17655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Barnathan ES, Raghunath PN, Tomaszewski JE, Ganz T, Cines DB, Higazi A al-R. Immunohistochemical localization of defensin in human coronary vessels. Am J Pathol. 1997;150(3):1009-1020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Horn M, Bertling A, Brodde MF, et al. . Human neutrophil alpha-defensins induce formation of fibrinogen and thrombospondin-1 amyloid-like structures and activate platelets via glycoprotein IIb/IIIa. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(4):647-661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Quinn KL, Henriques M, Tabuchi A, et al. . Human neutrophil peptides mediate endothelial-monocyte interaction, foam cell formation, and platelet activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(9):2070-2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Higazi AA-R, Ganz T, Kariko K, Cines DB. Defensin modulates tPA and plasminogen binding to fibrin and endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:17650-17655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Abu-Fanne R, Maraga E, Abd-Elrahman I, et al. . α-Defensins induce a post-translational modification of low density lipoprotein (LDL) that promotes atherosclerosis at normal levels of plasma cholesterol. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(6):2777-2786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nassar T, Akkawi S, Bar-Shavit R, et al. . Human alpha-defensin regulates smooth muscle cell contraction: a role for low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor. Blood. 2002;100(12):4026-4032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bdeir K, Higazi AA, Kulikovskaya I, et al. . Neutrophil alpha-defensins cause lung injury by disrupting the capillary-epithelial barrier. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(9):935-946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Eisenhauer PB, Lehrer RI. Mouse neutrophils lack defensins. Infect Immun. 1992;60(8):3446-3447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Higazi AA, Barghouti II, Ayesh SK, Mayer M, Matzner Y. Inhibition of neutrophil activation by fibrinogen. Inflammation. 1994;18(5):525-535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Higazi AA, Barghouti II, Abu-Much R. Identification of an inhibitor of tissue-type plasminogen activator-mediated fibrinolysis in human neutrophils. A role for defensin. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(16):9472-9477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Paoliello-Paschoalato AB, Azzolini AE, Cruz MF, et al. . Isolation of healthy individuals’ and rheumatoid arthritis patients’ peripheral blood neutrophils by the gelatin and Ficoll-Hypaque methods: comparative efficiency and impact on the neutrophil oxidative metabolism and Fcγ receptor expression. J Immunol Methods. 2014;412:70-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cines DB, Lebedeva T, Nagaswami C, et al. . Clot contraction: compression of erythrocytes into tightly packed polyhedra and redistribution of platelets and fibrin. Blood. 2014;123(10):1596-1603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.von Brühl ML, Stark K, Steinhart A, et al. . Monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets cooperate to initiate and propagate venous thrombosis in mice in vivo. J Exp Med. 2012;209(4):819-835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Christensen AD, Skov S, Haase C. The role of neutrophils and G-CSF in DNFB-induced contact hypersensitivity in mice. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2014;2(1):21-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Fanne RA, Nassar T, Mazuz A, et al. . Neuroprotection by glucagon: role of gluconeogenesis. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(1):85-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wachtfogel YT, Kucich U, James HL, et al. . Human plasma kallikrein releases neutrophil elastase during blood coagulation. J Clin Invest. 1983;72(5):1672-1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ganz T. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(9):710-720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Maas C, Renné T. Coagulation factor XII in thrombosis and inflammation. Blood. 2018;131(17):1903-1909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wachtfogel YT, Kucich U, Hack CE, et al. . Aprotinin inhibits the contact, neutrophil, and platelet activation systems during simulated extracorporeal perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106(1):1-9, discussion 9-10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hamad BK, Pathak M, Manna R, Fischer PM, Emsley J, Dekker LV. Assessment of the protein interaction between coagulation factor XII and corn trypsin inhibitor by molecular docking and biochemical validation. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15(9):1818-1828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Territo MC, Ganz T, Selsted ME, Lehrer R. Monocyte-chemotactic activity of defensins from human neutrophils. J Clin Invest. 1989;84(6):2017-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bergmann S, Hammerschmidt S. Fibrinolysis and host response in bacterial infections. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98(3):512-520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Påhlman LI, Mörgelin M, Kasetty G, Olin AI, Schmidtchen A, Herwald H. Antimicrobial activity of fibrinogen and fibrinogen-derived peptides: a novel link between coagulation and innate immunity. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109(5):930-939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Robson SC, Shephard EG, Kirsch RE. Fibrin degradation product D-dimer induces the synthesis and release of biologically active IL-1 beta, IL-6 and plasminogen activator inhibitors from monocytes in vitro. Br J Haematol. 1994;86(2):322-326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Leavell KJ, Peterson MW, Gross TJ. The role of fibrin degradation products in neutrophil recruitment to the lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1996;14(1):53-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Prestigiacomo CJ, Kim SC, Connolly ES Jr, Liao H, Yan SF, Pinsky DJ. CD18-mediated neutrophil recruitment contributes to the pathogenesis of reperfused but not nonreperfused stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(5):1110-1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Macrae FL, Duval C, Papareddy P, et al. . A fibrin biofilm covers blood clots and protects from microbial invasion. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(8):3356-3368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kwasny-Krochin B, Gluszko P, Undas A. Unfavorably altered fibrin clot properties in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Thromb Res. 2010;126(1):e11-e16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sadowski M, Ząbczyk M, Undas A. Coronary thrombus composition: links with inflammation, platelet and endothelial markers. Atherosclerosis. 2014;237(2):555-561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Natorska J, Undas A. Blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in aortic valve stenosis: links with inflammation and calcification. Thromb Haemost. 2015;114(2):217-227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Siudut J, Grela M, Wypasek E, Plens K, Undas A. Reduced plasma fibrin clot permeability and susceptibility to lysis are associated with increased risk of postthrombotic syndrome. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(4):784-793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Litvinov RI, Weisel JW. What is the biological and clinical relevance of fibrin? Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016;42(4):333-343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Mechanisms of fibrin polymerization and clinical implications. Blood. 2013;121(10):1712-1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Weisel JW. Structure of fibrin: impact on clot stability. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(suppl 1):116-124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zhou X, Kurowski S, Wu W, et al. . A rabbit model of cerebral microembolic signals for translational research: preclinical validation for aspirin and clopidogrel. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(9):1855-1866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Levy JH, Ageno W, Chan NC, Crowther M, Verhamme P, Weitz JI; Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation. When and how to use antidotes for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(3):623-627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hemkens LG, Ewald H, Gloy VL, et al. . Colchicine for prevention of cardiovascular events. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (1):CD011047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Liu JN, Gurewich V. A comparative study of the promotion of tissue plasminogen activator and pro-urokinase-induced plasminogen activation by fragments D and E-2 of fibrin. J Clin Invest. 1991;88(6):2012-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.