Skip to main content
Nutrients logoLink to Nutrients
. 2018 Dec 22;11(1):31. doi: 10.3390/nu11010031

Effects of Consuming Calcium-Rich Foods on the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Jimin Jeon 1, Jiyoung Jang 1, Kyong Park 1,*
PMCID: PMC6357094  PMID: 30583546

Abstract

The effect of calcium consumption in the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains controversial, and depends on food calcium sources. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the association between calcium-rich food consumption and T2DM incidence among Korean adults. We analyzed the data of 8574 adults aged 40–69 years, without a history of T2DM, cardiovascular disease, and cancer at the baseline from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. The consumption of calcium-rich foods was assessed using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. T2DM-related data were collected using biennial questionnaires, health examinations, and clinical tests. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. In the multivariate-adjusted model, yogurt intake was inversely associated with T2DM risk (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61–0.88 in the fourth quartile as compared to the first quartile). However, the intakes of other calcium-rich foods, including milk and anchovies, were not significantly associated with T2DM risk. Yogurt may provide protective effects against T2DM in Korean adults, owing to the beneficial effects of probiotics. Further prospective large-scale cohort studies should be conducted to validate these findings.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, calcium, yogurt, Korean adults

1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease resulting from metabolic impairment owing to hyperglycemia. T2DM can be caused by either insulin resistance or impaired insulin secretion [1], and is considered a component of metabolic syndrome [2]. The global prevalence of T2DM has been increasing and is predicted to increase from 8.8% in 2015 to 10.4% by 2040 [3]. According to recent statistics from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the incidence of T2DM in Korea is higher than the average in OECD countries [4]. The 2016 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey revealed that 11.3% of adults aged ≥30 years have T2DM [5]. T2DM causes several health complications, such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), an increase in morbidity and mortality, and a persistent aggravation of socioeconomic burden, making it a public health issue that demands constant attention worldwide [6].

To address this health issue, studies have proposed several dietary factors that may help prevent T2DM [7]. One of these factors is the intake of calcium, which is essential to insulin secretion and is involved in the mechanism of insulin action through the regulation of intracellular calcium levels [8]. According to a recent meta-analysis, calcium intake is associated with a lower risk of T2DM [9]. Similarly, epidemiological studies on the Korean population have reported an inverse association between dietary calcium intake and T2DM risk [10,11]. However, those previous analyses that used Korean data focused on single nutrient intake levels, without considering the type of food sources. In addition, they did not consider the screening of participants with implausible total energy intake values, or those with prevalent cardiovascular disease or cancer, which may affect interval validity in the analysis.

Calcium, as a nutrient, can be obtained through the consumption of various foods and dietary supplements, and its main source varies across countries. Unlike in Western countries, where dietary calcium is predominantly obtained from dairy products, in Korea, calcium sources include a variety of foods, including anchovies [12]. Previous reports have shown that the consumption of dairy products is lower among Koreans than in Western populations [13]. Non-dairy products such as kimchi, anchovies, tofu, radish leaves, soy, and sea mustard are the main sources of calcium among Koreans [12]. Furthermore, a calcium bioavailability analysis of calcium-rich foods showed that anchovies and tofu are as effective as milk [14].

Previous epidemiological studies that analyzed the effects of calcium-rich foods on T2DM showed inconsistent associations depending on the types of food sources, intake levels, ethnicity, and sex of the study populations [15,16,17,18]. For example, higher intakes of total dairy products were associated with decreased T2DM risk among Japanese women, but not among Japanese men [15]. The inverse association was evident among Australian men, but not Australian women [18]. The beneficial health effects of yogurt and fermented dairy products were also evident in Dutch [16] and Spanish [17] populations; however, higher intakes of full-fat dairy products were associated with T2DM prevalence [16].

While the association between calcium-rich food intake and T2DM risk has been reported primarily in the United States and Europe [19], few studies in Korean populations, in which the dietary calcium sources are more diverse than in Western countries, have focused on this association. Therefore, we aimed to prospectively examine the association between calcium-rich food consumption and T2DM incidence in Korean adults.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This study used data from the community-based Ansung-Ansan cohort, which was a part of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. The survey methods used in this study have been reported in detail elsewhere [20]. In brief, the Ansung-Ansan cohort comprises 10,030 adult men and women aged 40–69 years residing in the Ansung and Ansan areas of the Gyeonggi Province. The baseline survey was conducted between 2001 and 2002 through the collection of data on the participants’ demographics, diet, lifestyle, environmental factors, and diseases. After the baseline survey, follow-up surveys were conducted every two years. The present study is based on the data obtained during the 2002–2012 follow-up. All surveys and data collection were conducted by trained researchers according to standardized protocols.

Of the 10,030 people who participated in the Ansung-Ansan baseline survey, those with a previous diagnosis of T2DM, CVD, or cancer, and those taking medications or receiving treatments for these diseases (n = 1132) were excluded. We also excluded participants with missing data on the sources of calcium (n = 83) and those with a total daily energy intake <500 kcal or >5000 kcal (n = 241) [21]. Finally, 8574 participants were included in the current analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart showing the participant selection process. KoGES, Korean Genome and Epidemiology study.

Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The methods used for data collection and analysis were approved by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Institutional Review Board (IRB number: KU-IRB-15-EX-256-A-1) and the Yeungnam University Institutional Review Board (IRB number: 7002016-E-2016-003).

2.2. General Participant Characteristics and Anthropometric Measurements

Data on the participants’ age, sex, residential area, education level, household income, physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking status, and use of dietary supplements were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires. Education level was classified as elementary school graduate or lower, middle school graduate, high school graduate, and college graduate or higher. Smoking status included current smoker, former smoker, and non-smoker. Based on alcohol consumption, participants were classified as drinkers and non-drinkers. Household income was categorized into the following four groups based on the average monthly income: <1 million Korean Republic Won (KRW), 1–<2 million KRW, 2–<4 million KRW, and ≥4 million KRW. Physical activity levels were quantified using metabolic equivalents of task (MET-hours/week), considering the weekly physical activity time and through the application of weights by exercise intensity [22]. Data on anthropometric parameters, such as weight and height, were collected by a trained technician, and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the weight (kg) by the height squared (m2). The obesity status of the participants was reclassified using the BMI criteria of the World Health Organization for Asians [23], in which a BMI <25 kg/m2 indicates the absence of obesity and a value ≥25 kg/m2 indicates the presence of obesity.

2.3. Dietary Assessment

Dietary intake was assessed in the baseline survey (2001–2002) and the second follow-up survey (2005–2006) using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQFFQ). The validity and reproducibility of the SQFFQ have been reported previously [24]. In brief, questions on the frequency of food intake in the SQFFQ had nine possible responses: almost never, once per month, 2–3 times per month, 1–2 times per week, 3–4 times per week, 5–6 times per week, once per day, twice per day, and 3 times per day. Similarly, questions on the amount of food consumed had three possible responses: half a serving, one serving, and one-and-a-half servings. In this study, after the conversion of all frequencies to weekly frequencies, the amount of food consumed each time was used as a weight to determine the weekly intake (servings/week). Mean values were calculated across dietary data from the baseline survey and second follow-up survey to minimize misclassification. For missing dietary values during the second follow-up period, we imputed data using the fully conditional specification approach [25].

Based on Koreans’ calcium intake patterns and the Korean nutrient database, milk, yogurt, cheese, anchovies, lettuce, perilla leaves, sea mustard, laver, and beans were selected as the major calcium sources. The sum of the intake levels of each of these foods was used to calculate the total intake of calcium-rich foods. Of the dietary variables used as covariates, total vegetable intake was calculated from the sum of the intakes of 17 vegetables (Chinese cabbages, spinaches, lettuces, perilla leaves, bellflower roots, bean sprouts, bracken/sweet potato stems, red pepper leaves, leek/water dropworts/chamnamuls, cucumbers, carrots, onions, green peppers, pumpkins, courgettes, tomatoes, and mushrooms), excluding kimchi. Similarly, total fruit intake was calculated from the sum of the intakes of 11 fruits (strawberries, oriental melons/melons, watermelons, peaches, bananas, persimmons, mandarins, pears, apples, oranges, and grapes). Unprocessed beef and pork were defined as red meat, and ham and sausage were defined as processed meat.

2.4. Ascertainment of T2DM

T2DM-related data were collected through biennial questionnaires, health examinations, and clinical tests. All the procedures and clinical tests were performed by trained staff. T2DM cases were ascertained based on the following criteria: (1) fasting blood glucose (FBG) level ≥126 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%) according to the criteria of the Korean Diabetes Association [26], (2) a doctor’s diagnosis, or (3) taking medication or undergoing current treatment for T2DM.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The follow-up duration was calculated based on the time interval between the date of the baseline examination and (a) the date at which an event occurred for a participant with T2DM or (b) the last known date of life in those without T2DM. A chi-square test for categorical variables and a linear regression analysis for continuous variables were performed to compute the mean and standard error for each quartile of calcium-rich food intake. Energy-adjusted food and nutrient intakes were calculated using the residual method [21].

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multiple potential confounding variables and effect modifiers were determined based on preliminary analyses and previous studies [16,27,28]. The p for trend was calculated using the median of the food intake quartiles as a continuous variable. Interactions with demographic and lifestyle factors were tested using linear and Cox proportional hazards regression. We then built three covariate models: (a) model 1 that was unadjusted; (b) model 2 that was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, residential area, education level, household income, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoking status; and (c) model 3 that was additionally adjusted for a history of hypertension, family history of T2DM, use of antihypertensive medication, use of dietary supplements, and intakes of vegetables, fruits, red meat, processed meat, soft drinks, coffee, and tea. Statistical Analysis System version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses, with significance defined as p < 0.05.

3. Results

During the average follow-up of 7.3 years, 1173 incident cases of T2DM were identified. The mean age of the participants at the baseline was 51.7 ± 0.1 years. Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the participants based on the quartiles of total calcium-rich food intake. A higher intake of calcium-rich foods was observed among women (p < 0.001), residents of Ansan (p < 0.001), individuals with moderate physical activity (p < 0.001), non-drinkers (p < 0.001), non-smokers (p < 0.001), and users of dietary supplements (p < 0.001). A higher intake of calcium-rich foods was also significantly associated with lower education levels (p < 0.001) and lower household income (p < 0.001).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants according to quartiles (Q) of energy-adjusted total calcium product intake.

Total Calcium Product Intake (Quartile) p value a
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
n 2143 2144 2144 2143
Total calcium product intake (servings/week) 7.0 12.2 17.6 26.9
Male 1272 (59.4) 1190 (55.5) 1009 (47.1) 613 (28.6) <0.001
Age (years) 51.4 ± 0.2 50.7 ± 0.2 51.4 ± 0.2 53.3 ± 0.2 <0.001
Residential area <0.001
Ansung 1318 (61.5) 902 (42.1) 867 (40.4) 1033 (48.2)
Ansan 825 (38.5) 1242 (57.9) 1277 (59.6) 1110 (51.8)
Education level <0.001
Elementary school graduation or lower 744 (35.0) 609 (28.6) 635 (29.8) 770 (36.1)
Middle school graduation 494 (23.2) 470 (22.1) 474 (22.2) 522 (24.5)
High school graduation 629 (29.6) 725 (34.0) 699 (32.8) 594 (27.8)
College graduation or higher 260 (12.2) 328 (15.4) 325 (15.2) 248 (11.6)
Monthly household income (KRW) <0.001
<1,000,000 861 (40.7) 643 (30.3) 625 (29.5) 753 (35.7)
1,000,000–<2,000,000 626 (29.6) 640 (30.2) 591 (27.9) 639 (30.3)
2,000,000–<4,000,000 525 (24.8) 660 (31.2) 687 (32.5) 563 (26.7)
≥4,000,000 103 (4.9) 176 (8.3) 213 (10.1) 153 (7.3)
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.5 ± 0.1 24.5 ± 0.1 24.6 ± 0.1 24.5 ± 0.1 0.3
Physical activity b <0.001
Low 674 (31.6) 773 (36.3) 713 (33.7) 678 (31.9)
Mid 563 (26.4) 719 (33.8) 760 (35.9) 789 (37.1)
High 894 (42.0) 638 (30.0) 646 (30.5) 661 (31.1)
Alcohol consumption (yes) 1113 (52.2) 1152 (53.9) 1050 (49.2) 808 (37.9) <0.001
Smoking status <0.001
Non-smokers 1031 (48.5) 1151 (53.9) 1260 (59.5) 1557 (73.5)
Former smokers 361 (17.0) 378 (17.7) 331 (15.6) 217 (10.3)
Smokers 736 (34.6) 606 (28.4) 528 (24.9) 344 (16.2)
Dietary supplement use (yes) 277 (13.1) 347 (16.4) 409 (19.4) 541 (25.3) <0.001

Values are mean ± standard error or n (%); KRW is Korean Republic Won; a p values are derived from χ2 test for categorical variables and from generalized linear regression analysis for continuous variables; b Physical activity was categorized into three groups, according to tertile of metabolic equivalents (MET)-hours/week.

The HRs of incident T2DM based on the quartiles of calcium-rich food intake are shown in Table 2. In the minimally and fully adjusted models, a higher intake of yogurt was associated with a decreased risk of incident T2DM (model 1 HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.53–0.74 and model 3 HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61–0.88; p for trend: 0.01). Meanwhile, the intakes of milk, anchovies, and other sources (cheese, beans, perilla leaves, sea mustard, laver, and lettuce) of calcium were not significantly associated with T2DM risk.

Table 2.

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for diabetes risk according to energy-adjusted calcium product intake level.

Frequency of Consumption (Quartile) p for Trend
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Milk
Median, servings/week 0 0.3 2.0 8.0
Case/n 307/2139 305/2140 271/2140 288/2139
Person year 13,815 15,407 15,750 15,312
Model 1 1 0.89 (0.76, 1.05) 0.78 (0.66, 0.91) 0.85 (0.72, 1.00) 0.2
Model 2 1 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) 0.95 (0.80, 1.12) 1.04 (0.88, 1.23) 0.6
Model 3 1 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) 0.95 (0.79, 1.13) 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) 0.7
Yogurt
Median, servings/week 0 0.3 1.3 5.0
Case/n 323/2139 311/2139 295/2040 241/2139
Person year 13,246 15,558 15,751 15,708
Model 1 1 0.82 (0.70, 0.96) 0.77 (0.66, 0.90) 0.63 (0.53, 0.74) <0.001
Model 2 1 0.83 (0.71, 0.97) 0.84 (0.72, 0.99) 0.72 (0.60, 0.86) 0.002
Model 3 1 0.82 (0.70, 0.97) 0.84 (0.70, 0.99) 0.73 (0.61, 0.88) 0.01
Anchovies
Median, servings/week 0.2 0.8 1.8 4.6
Case/n 310/2141 291/2141 282/2142 288/2141
Person year 13,596 15,607 15,830 15,281
Model 1 1 0.82 (0.70, 0.96) 0.78 (0.66, 0.92) 0.83 (0.70, 0.97) 0.1
Model 2 1 0.93 (0.79, 1.10) 0.86 (0.73, 1.02) 0.89 (0.75, 1.05) 0.3
Model 3 1 0.91 (0.77, 1.08) 0.82 (0.69, 0.98) 0.87 (0.73, 1.04) 0.2
Other calcium sources *
Median, servings/week 4.0 7.1 10.5 17.6
Case/n 327/2143 296/2144 257/2144 293/2143
Person year 14,635 15,564 15,499 14,688
Model 1 1 0.83 (0.70, 0.97) 0.81 (0.69, 0.95) 1.07 (0.91, 1.25) 0.1
Model 2 1 0.91 (0.77, 1.08) 0.86 (0.72, 1.02) 1.05 (0.89, 1.24) 0.4
Model 3 1 0.86 (0.72, 1.03) 0.78 (0.85, 0.93) 0.97 (0.81, 1.16) 1.0
Total calcium products
Median, servings/week 7.0 12.2 17.6 26.9
Case/n 341/2143 276/2144 284/2144 272/2143
Person year 14,526 15,512 15,395 14,953
Model 1 1 0.77 (0.66, 0.91) 0.82 (0.70, 0.97) 0.93 (0.79, 1.08) 0.8
Model 2 1 0.85 (0.72, 1.00) 0.88 (0.74, 1.04) 0.98 (0.83, 1.16) 0.9
Model 3 1 0.82 (0.69, 0.97) 0.83 (0.70, 0.99) 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) 0.7

* Sum of cheese, tofu, perilla leaves, sea mustard, laver, and lettuce; Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, residential area, education level, household income, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoking status; Model 3: additionally adjusted for history of hypertension, family history of type 2 diabetes, use of antihypertensive medication, use of dietary supplements, and intakes of vegetables, fruits, red meat, processed meat, soft drinks, coffee, and tea; Q, quartile.

The association between yogurt intake and T2DM incidence was further analyzed by stratifying multiple demographic factors such as sex, BMI, alcohol consumption, and smoking status (Figure 2). The association between yogurt intake and T2DM risk was not affected by sex (p for interaction = 0.3), BMI (p for interaction = 0.3), alcohol consumption (p for interaction = 0.5), or smoking status (p for interaction = 0.3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of various demographic factors on the association between yogurt intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs, shown in parentheses) of T2DM in the fourth quartile of energy-adjusted yogurt intake were compared to the first quartile based on sex, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. Values were adjusted for the listed variables simultaneously and other potential confounders which included age, residential area, education level, household income, physical activity, history of hypertension, family history of type 2 diabetes, use of antihypertensive medication, use of dietary supplements, and intakes of vegetables, fruits, red meat, processed meat, soft drinks, coffee, and tea. BMI, body mass index.

4. Discussion

This study prospectively examined the association between calcium-rich food intake and T2DM among Korean adults using community-based Ansung-Ansan cohort data. Of the calcium-rich food intakes evaluated, although higher yogurt intakes were associated with a decreased T2DM risk, none of the other foods showed any association. Yogurt, as a fermented dairy product, is beneficial to health. Besides being a source of protein, minerals, and vitamins, many types of yogurt contain high concentrations of probiotics such as Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus [29], which are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, positively affect health [30]. At appropriate doses, probiotics can alleviate intestinal conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease [31], and the lactic acid produced during yogurt fermentation increases protein and calcium absorption, thereby promoting bone mineralization [32]. Moreover, probiotics have anti-inflammatory [31] and antioxidant effects [33] associated with T2DM prevention. An excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species results in oxidative stress, inflammation that interferes with insulin pathways, and increased insulin resistance [34]. Probiotics reduce oxidative stress and the degree of inflammation, in turn reducing the rate of insulin resistance. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including T2DM participants, have reported significantly lower HbA1c and FBG levels, as well as insulin resistance rates in participant groups that consume probiotics [35,36]. Participants who consumed yogurt had metabolic profiles with significantly lower FBG levels and reduced insulin resistance rates than those who did not consume the same [37]. Moreover, the vitamin D and magnesium found in yogurt also have beneficial effects in T2DM prevention [38,39].

Previous studies that analyzed the association between yogurt intake and T2DM risk showed consistent results [16,17,40]. In a study of American women, higher yogurt intake levels were associated with a lower T2DM risk (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70–0.97) [40]. This association was evident regardless of whether the yogurt was low-fat (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47–0.97) or regular (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47–0.92) [17]. Furthermore, a recent pooled analysis confirmed that yogurt intake reduces T2DM risk [19]. However, besides yogurt, no other dairy products had any effect on T2DM prevention. In a meta-analysis, neither milk (standard, high-fat, and low-fat) nor cheese was significantly associated with T2DM risk [19]. Although no mechanism clearly explains the differences in the preventive effects of different dairy products, the beneficial effects of yogurt may be attributed to the presence of probiotics. Further research is needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying these differences.

This study has several limitations. Although we adjusted for multiple confounding factors that could affect T2DM risk, the results could have been affected by other residual confounding factors that we could not measure or were unaware of. Additionally, we could not perform a more detailed analysis based on contents such as fat and probiotics, as dairy products are sold without distinction of fat content in the Korean market, and even if the contents and concentrations of probiotics are different across various brands and products, the relevant data are insufficient [41]. Lastly, as the study participants were limited to residents of the Ansung and Ansan area in South Korea, it may be difficult to generalize the study’s results for other populations. Despite these limitations, we estimated the dietary intakes using repeated measurements to minimize measurement errors, and prospectively analyzed the association between calcium-rich food intake and T2DM risk in the Korean population.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study’s results show that among the intakes of several different calcium-rich foods, those of yogurt alone reduce T2DM risk. Further large-scale RCTs should be conducted, considering the composition of yogurt (sugar, fat, and probiotics).

Acknowledgments

The data used in this study were derived from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study, National Research Institute of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P.; Methodology, K.P., J.J. (Jimin Jeon), and J.J. (Jiyoung Jang); Software, J.J. (Jimin Jeon) and J.J. (Jiyoung Jang); Validation, K.P.; Formal Analysis, J.J. (Jimin Jeon) and J.J. (Jiyoung Jang); Data Curation, J.J. (Jimin Jeon) and J.J. (Jiyoung Jang); Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.J. (Jimin Jeon); Writing—Review and Editing, K.P. and J.J. (Jiyoung Jang); Visualization, J.J. (Jimin Jeon); Supervision, K.P.

Funding

This research was supported by a Yeungnam University research grant in 2018. The funding sponsor had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.American Diabetes Association Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl. 1):S81–S90. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tenenbaum A., Fisman E.Z., Motro M. Metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Focus on peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPAR) Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2003;2:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-2-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ogurtsova K., da Rocha Fernandes J.D., Huang Y., Linnenkamp U., Guariguata L., Cho N.H., Cavan D., Shaw J.E., Makaroff L.E. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017;128:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Health at a Glance 2017. [(accessed on 12 May 2018)]; Available online: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/health_glance-2017-en.
  • 5.Statistics Korea Statistical Database. [(accessed on 11 May 2018)]; Available online: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_11702_N102&conn_path=I2.
  • 6.Deshpande A.D., Harris-Hayes M., Schootman M. Epidemiology of diabetes and diabetes-related complications. Phys. Ther. 2008;88:1254–1264. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ley S.H., Hamdy O., Mohan V., Hu F.B. Prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: Dietary components and nutritional strategies. Lancet. 2014;383:1999–2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60613-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wollheim C.B., Sharp G.W. Regulation of insulin release by calcium. Physiol. Rev. 1981;61:914–973. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.4.914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dong J.Y., Qin L.Q. Dietary calcium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: Possible confounding by magnesium. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;66:408–410. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oh J.M., Woo H.W., Kim M.K., Lee Y.H., Shin D.H., Shin M.H., Choi B.Y. Dietary total, animal, vegetable calcium and type 2 diabetes incidence among Korean adults: The Korean Multi-Rural Communities Cohort (MRCohort) Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017;27:1152–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim K.N., Oh S.Y., Hong Y.C. Associations of serum calcium levels and dietary calcium intake with incident type 2 diabetes over 10 years: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2018;10:50. doi: 10.1186/s13098-018-0349-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yu A., Yang Y.J., Jeong S., Kim J., Kim Y.J., Kwon O., Oh S.-Y., Kim J. Calcium intakes in Korean and American populations. J. Korean Diet. Assoc. 2013;19:46–58. doi: 10.14373/JKDA.2013.19.1.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.The United Sates Department of Agriculture Dairy: World Markets and Trade. [(accessed on 10 October 2018)]; Available online: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/downloads.
  • 14.Lee S.H., Chang S.O. Comparison of the Bioavailability of Calcium from Anchovy, Tofu and Nonfat Dry Milk (NFDM) in Growing Male Rats. Korean J. Nutr. 1994;27:473–482. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kirii K., Mizoue T., Iso H., Takahashi Y., Kato M., Inoue M., Noda M., Tsugane S. Calcium, vitamin D and dairy intake in relation to type 2 diabetes risk in a Japanese cohort. Diabetologia. 2009;52:2542–2550. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1554-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eussen S.J., van Dongen M.C., Wijckmans N., den Biggelaar L., Oude Elferink S.J., Singh-Povel C.M., Schram M.T., Sep S.J., van der Kallen C.J., Koster A., et al. Consumption of dairy foods in relation to impaired glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Maastricht Study. Br. J. Nutr. 2016;115:1453–1461. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diaz-Lopez A., Bullo M., Martinez-Gonzalez M.A., Corella D., Estruch R., Fito M., Gomez-Gracia E., Fiol M., Garcia de la Corte F.J., Ros E., et al. Dairy product consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in an elderly Spanish Mediterranean population at high cardiovascular risk. Eur. J. Nutr. 2016;55:349–360. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0855-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grantham N.M., Magliano D.J., Hodge A., Jowett J., Meikle P., Shaw J.E. The association between dairy food intake and the incidence of diabetes in Australia: The Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) Public Health Nutr. 2013;16:339–345. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012001310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gijsbers L., Ding E.L., Malik V.S., de Goede J., Geleijnse J.M., Soedamah-Muthu S.S. Consumption of dairy foods and diabetes incidence: A dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;103:1111–1124. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.123216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim Y., Han B.G. Cohort Profile: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Consortium. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017;46:1350. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2012. pp. 305–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ainsworth B.E., Haskell W.L., Leon A.S., Jacobs D.R., Jr., Montoye H.J., Sallis J.F., Paffenbarger R.S., Jr. Compendium of physical activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1993;25:71–80. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.World Health Organization The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. [(accessed on 15 May 2018)]; Available online: http://www.wpro.who.int/nutrition/documents/Redefining_obesity/en.
  • 24.Ahn Y., Kwon E., Shim J.E., Park M.K., Joo Y., Kimm K., Park C., Kim D.H. Validation and reproducibility of food frequency questionnaire for Korean genome epidemiologic study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007;61:1435–1441. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nevalainen J., Kenward M.G., Virtanen S.M. Missing values in longitudinal dietary data: A multiple imputation approach based on a fully conditional specification. Stat. Med. 2009;28:3657–3669. doi: 10.1002/sim.3731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Korean Diabetes Association Treatment Guideline for Diabetes. [(accessed on 10 July 2018)]; Available online: http://www.diabetes.or.kr/pro/publish/guide.php?code=guide&mode=list&year_v=2015.
  • 27.Sluijs I., Forouhi N.G., Beulens J.W., van der Schouw Y.T., Agnoli C., Arriola L., Balkau B., Barricarte A., Boeing H., Bueno-de-Mesquita H.B., et al. The amount and type of dairy product intake and incident type 2 diabetes: Results from the EPIC-InterAct Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;96:382–390. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.021907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.O’Connor L.M., Lentjes M.A., Luben R.N., Khaw K.T., Wareham N.J., Forouhi N.G. Dietary dairy product intake and incident type 2 diabetes: A prospective study using dietary data from a 7-day food diary. Diabetologia. 2014;57:909–917. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3176-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bourlioux P., Pochart P. Nutritional and health properties of yogurt. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 1988;56:217–258. doi: 10.1159/000416229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G.R., Merenstein D.J., Pot B., Morelli L., Canani R.B., Flint H.J., Salminen S., et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shadnoush M., Shaker Hosseini R., Mehrabi Y., Delpisheh A., Alipoor E., Faghfoori Z., Mohammadpour N., Zaringhalam Moghadam J. Probiotic yogurt Affects Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Factors in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Iran J. Pharm. Res. 2013;12:929–936. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tamang J.P. Health Benefits of Fermented Foods and Beverages. CRC Press; New York, NY, USA: 2015. pp. 285–293. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang Y., Wu Y., Wang Y., Xu H., Mei X., Yu D., Wang Y., Li W. Antioxidant Properties of Probiotic Bacteria. Nutrients. 2017;9:521. doi: 10.3390/nu9050521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tangvarasittichai S. Oxidative stress, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J. Diabetes. 2015;6:456–480. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i3.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kobyliak N., Falalyeyeva T., Mykhalchyshyn G., Kyriienko D., Komissarenko I. Effect of alive probiotic on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes patients: Randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bayat A., Azizi-Soleiman F., Heidari-Beni M., Feizi A., Iraj B., Ghiasvand R., Askari G. Effect of Cucurbita ficifolia and Probiotic Yogurt Consumption on Blood Glucose, Lipid Profile, and Inflammatory Marker in Type 2 Diabetes. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2016;7:30. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.175455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang H., Livingston K.A., Fox C.S., Meigs J.B., Jacques P.F. Yogurt consumption is associated with better diet quality and metabolic profile in American men and women. Nutr. Res. 2013;33:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hruby A., Meigs J.B., O’Donnell C.J., Jacques P.F., McKeown N.M. Higher magnesium intake reduces risk of impaired glucose and insulin metabolism and progression from prediabetes to diabetes in middle-aged americans. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:419–427. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gao Y., Zheng T., Ran X. Vitamin D and Incidence of Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes: A Four-Year Follow-Up Community-Based Study. Dis. Markers. 2018;2018:1926308. doi: 10.1155/2018/1926308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liu S., Choi H.K., Ford E., Song Y., Klevak A., Buring J.E., Manson J.E. A prospective study of dairy intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1579–1584. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dunlap B.S., Yu H., Elitsur Y. The probiotic content of commercial yogurts in west virginia. Clin. Pediatr. 2009;48:522–527. doi: 10.1177/0009922809331802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nutrients are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES