Abstract
Formaldehyde (FA) is a common environmental toxin that is also produced naturally in the body through a wide range of metabolic and epigenetic processes, motivating the development of new technologies to monitor this reactive carbonyl species (RCS) in living systems. Here, we report a pair of first-generation chemiluminescent probes for selective formaldehyde detection. Caging phenoxy-dioxetane scaffolds bearing different electron-withdrawing groups with a general 2-aza-Cope reactive formaldehyde trigger provides Chemiluminescent Formaldehyde Probes 540 and 700 (CFAP540 and CFAP700) for visible and near-IR detection of FA in living cells and mice, respectively. In particular, CFAP700 is capable of visualizing FA release derived from endogenous folate metabolism, providing a starting point for the use of CFAPs and related chemical tools to probe FA physiology and pathology, as well as for the development of a broader palette of chemiluminescent activity-based sensing (ABS) probes that can be employed from in vitro biochemical to cell to animal models.
Keywords: activity-based sensing, chemiluminescence, formaldehyde, oxetane, one-carbon metabolism
Graphical Abstract
COMMUNICATION
A first-generation set of chemiluminescent activity-based sensing probes for in vivo imaging of formaldehyde is reported. A formaldehyde-selective trigger is used to cage a phenol-dioxetane scaffold that emits a photon after aza-Cope-dependent uncaging. These reagents were utilized to image formaldehyde fluxes in living cells and mice, enabling the unique identification of endogenous formaldehyde production from metabolic folate cycles in vivo.
Formaldehyde (FA) is a reactive carbonyl species (RCS) most commonly associated with being an external environmental pollutant, but it is also produced internally through a diverse array of biological processes.[1,2] This major one-carbon unit lies at the nexus of metabolism and epigenetics, participating in the synthesis of key biological molecules, including purines, amino acids, and neurotransmitters,[3–5] as well as in the methylation status of a variety of nucleic acid, protein, and small-molecule metabolites.[6–10]
The small and transient nature of FA has motivated growing interest in developing new activity-based sensing (ABS) methods[11–14] for selective FA detection,[15,16] including aza-Cope,[17–24] aminal, [25,26] and formimine [27–32] reaction-based triggers. Indeed, recent progress in developing fluorescent probes for FA detection in cells has elucidated more sophisticated biological roles for FA as both an exogenous toxin and an endogenous signaling molecule. Included is the discovery that FA is endogenously produced in the folate cycle through specific intermediates like tetrahydrofolate (THF) and 5,10-methyleneTHF, but not others like 5-methylTHF,[8] opening new doors to investigate the intriguing yet complex relationships between FA, methylation status and carcinogenesis. Despite these advances in fluorescent FA detection, FA imaging in living mammals is limited to an aza-Cope-based PET tracer,[33] which requires specialized equipment to implement. As such, we sought to develop a single, general platform for FA-selective ABS that would be applicable across a broader spectrum of biological models from in vitro biochemical to cell to in vivo animal systems. To this end, we turned our attention to chemiluminescent imaging, which offers an attractive approach in that it does not require external light irradiation, resulting in minimal background signal.[34–38] Here, we report first-generation chemiluminescent probes capable of visualizing changes in FA from in vitro to in vivo mouse models, offering a versatile approach to ABS of this central one-carbon molecule.
Our design relies upon a class of luminophores based on Schaap’s dioxetane,[39,40] which has been exploited to create chemiluminescent probes for analytes spanning reactive oxygen/sulfur species[41–45] and enzyme activity.[43,46,47] Recent work from one of our labs has identified that introducing electron-withdrawing groups onto the ortho position of the phenol can result in a 1000-fold increase in chemiluminescence quantum efficiency and the ability to tune emission profiles,[43] particularly to the near-IR region to enable better tissue penetration for in vivo imaging.[48] Based on this scaffold, we created a set of chemiluminescent FA probes by caging this phenol with a 2-aza-Cope FA-reactive trigger (Scheme 1).[20] Chemiluminescent Formaldehyde Probes 540 and 700 (CFAP540 and CFAP700) feature visible and near-IR emission profiles designed for in vitro cell and in vivo animal applications, respectively (see Supporting Information for synthetic details). Reaction of FA at the homoallylamine, followed by immolation of the two-carbon linker through a β-elimination, yields the free phenol-dioxetane that subsequently decomposes through chemiexcitation to produce a photon.
With these CFAP reagents in hand, we first evaluated their chemiluminescent responses to FA (Figure 1) by adding a large excess of FA (10 mM) and measuring the light emission over several hours. The probes displayed a robust response to FA, with maximum light emission obtained within the first 60 minutes. CFAP540 exhibits a maximum intensity increase of 500-fold compared to baseline (Figure 1a) with CFAP700 showing a 33-fold intensity increase (Figure 1d). The lower observed turn-on response for CFAP700 is likely due to minor off-pathway uncaging in buffered solution (Figure S5). To test responses to physiological concentrations of FA, the probes were exposed to 0, 10, 25, and 50 μM FA. Under these conditions, both CFAP540 and CFAP700 were capable of detecting 25–50 9μM levels of FA, with CFAP540 capable of detecting 10 μM changes in FA due to its superior signal-to-noise response. Owing to their shared aza-Cope trigger, the CFAP reagents are highly selective for FA, with minimal emission observed upon reaction with other biologically-relevant aldehydes and molecules (Figure 1c, f).
With data showing that the probes are sensitive and selective for detecting FA in buffer, we next determined the ability of the CFAP platform to detect FA in living cells (Figure 2). HEK293 cells were first incubated with 10 μM CFAP540 for 30 minutes in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), then washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove excess probe. CFAP700, which lacks the esterase-sensitive methyl ester substituent found in CFAP540, is not cell-trappable under these repeated washing conditions and was not employed for cellular FA detection. Chemiluminescent signal was then measured for 90 minutes after exogenous addition of 0, 200, 500, or 1000 μM FA and showed a dose-dependent increase for CFAP540. Flow cytometry experiments confirm that the cells remain viable throughout the course of the experiment (Figure S8).
We then moved on to evaluate the CFAP platform for in vivo FA imaging in mouse models and utilized the red-shifted emission profile of CFAP700 for deeper tissue penetration. We first sought to establish that CFAP700 can detect exogenous FA addition in living animals in a dose-dependent manner. Anesthetized FVB-luc+ mice received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of 0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg FA in water; all doses are well below the LD50 range for FA reported for rodents.[49] The mice received subsequent i.p. injections of 100 μM CFAP700. Five minutes after injection, the mice were imaged with an IVIS luminescence instrument every 2.5 minutes over a 25-minute period. Figure 3a provides representative images of five mice injected with increasing amounts of FA. We observed a 1.8-fold increase at the lowest administered dose of 1.25 mpk, and a 28-fold increase at the highest administered dose (10 mpk), highlighting the significant dynamic range of the CFAP700 probe for in vivo FA detection in these mouse models.
To support these results, we injected (i.p.) mice with either 2.5 mpk FA or water vehicle, then injected either 25 mpk sodium bisulfite as a FA scavenger or water vehicle, then injected 100 μM CFAP700. Mice that were injected with FA and sodium bisulfite showed no statistically significant difference in signal compared to the vehicle-treated control (Figure 3c, d). We also found that bisulfite addition alone does not yield a discernable response from the vehicle control. These experiments further support the ability of CFAP700 to detect changes in FA levels in living mice.
Finally, we demonstrated that the CFAP700 probe is capable of detecting endogenous FA fluxes that are produced by the folate cycle, particularly through tetrahydrofolate metabolism (Figure 4). In these experiments, mice were injected with either vehicle (DMSO) or tetrahydrofolate (30 mpk), vehicle (water) or sodium bisulfite (25 mpk), and then 100 μM CFAP700. We observed an immediate difference at the first imaging point between the tetrahydrofolate- and vehicle-treated mice, which is consistent with the rapid rate of tetrahydrofolate metabolism detailed recently in cell models.[8]
In separate control experiments, we did not find any statistically significant differences between vehicle-treated mice and tetrahydrofolate-treated mice that were also exposed to the FA scavenger sodium bisulfite (25 mpk), which further establishes that the increased emission signal we observe upon tetrahydrofolate injection arises from the generation of FA from endogenous folate metabolism. Interestingly, we show that treatment with an equimolar quantity of aqueous calcium folinate (37 mpk) followed by CFAP700 injection does not give any discernable difference in chemiluminescent signal over vehicle-treated mice (Figure S7). These data reveal that folinate and tetrahydrofolate, two important components of the folate cycle, show starkly different metabolic activities related to FA where folinate does not produce FA[50] and tetrahydrofolate is an effective FA producer in vivo.
To close, we have reported a first-generation pair of chemiluminescent probes for FA utilizing a general 2-aza-Cope FA-reactive trigger and a chemiluminegenic phenoxy-dioxetane scaffold. Functionalization at the ortho-position of the phenol yielded two distinct reagents that span the ability to monitor FA from in vitro biochemical to cell to in vivo animal models. Both CFAP540 and CFAP700 show high selectivity and sensitivity to FA, where the cell-trappability of CFAP540 makes it suitable for cellular FA detection whereas the red-shifted emission profile of CFAP700 can be exploited for live-animal FA visualization. Moreover, CFAP700 provides the first in vivo evidence that folinate and tetrahydrofolate have distinct abilities to generate FA through folate cycle metabolism, presaging the utility of the CFAP platform and related chemical tools to help disentangle the complex pathways of FA production, metabolism, and signaling, particularly in the context of one-carbon biological chemistry. Finally, this work provides a general path forward to develop bright and tunable chemiluminescent ABS probes for a broader range of biological analytes that can be used in various types of specimens.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NIH (NIEHS 28096 and NIEHS 04705 to C.J.C.). K.J.B. was partially supported by an NSF graduate fellowship. T.A.S. was supported by an NIH Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Fellowship (F32 GM122248). C.J.C. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. We thank Prof. Marie Heffern, Ms. Diyala Shihadih, and Prof. Andreas Stahl for providing us with initial breeding pairs for our in-house breeding colony.
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.
References
- [1].He RQ, Lu J, Miao JY, Sci. China Life Sci. 2010, 53, 1399–1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Liteplo RG, Beauchamp R, Meek ME, Chénier R, Formaldehyde: Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 40, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Tibbetts AS, Appling DR, Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2010, 30, 57–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Locasale JW, Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 572–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Tedeschi PM, Markert EK, Gounder M, Lin H, Dvorzhinski D, Dolfi SC, Chan LLY, Qiu J, DiPaola RS, Hirshfield KM, et al. , Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Ehrlich M, Oncogene 2002, 21, 5400–5413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Lu SC, Mato JM, Physiol. Rev. 2012, 92, 1515–1542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Burgos-Barragan G, Wit N, Meiser J, Dingler FA, Pietzke M, Mulderrig L, Pontel LB, Rosado IV, Brewer TF, Cordell RL, et al. , Nature 2017, 548, 549–554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Hamm S, Just G, Lacoste N, Moitessier N, Szyf M, Mamer O, Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 1046–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Walport LJ, Hopkinson RJ, Schofield CJ, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012, 16, 525–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Chan J, Dodani SC, Chang CJ, Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 973–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Lee MH, Kim JS, Sessler JL, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4185–4191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Chen X, Tian X, Shin I, Yoon J, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Yang Y, Zhao Q, Feng W, Li F, Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 192–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Bruemmer KJ, Brewer TF, Chang CJ, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 39, 17–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Xu Z, Chen J, Hu L-L, Tan Y, Liu S-H, Yin J, Chinese Chem. Lett. 2017, 28, 1935–1942. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Brewer TF, Chang CJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10886–10889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Roth A, Li H, Anorma C, Chan J, Brewer TF, Chang CJ, Roth A, Li H, Anorma C, Chan J, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10890–10893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Liu W, Truillet C, Flavell RR, Brewer TF, Evans MJ, Wilson DM, Chang CJ, Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 5503–5507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Bruemmer KJ, Walvoord RR, Brewer TF, Burgos-Barragan G, Wit N, Pontel LB, Patel KJ, Chang CJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5338–5350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Brewer TF, Burgos-Barragan G, Wit N, Patel KJ, Chang CJ, Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4073–4081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Dou K, Chen G, Yu F, Liu Y, Chen L, Cao Z, Chen T, Li Y, You J, Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 7851–7861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Zhou Y, Yan J, Zhang N, Li D, Xiao S, Zheng K, Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2018, 258, 156–162. [Google Scholar]
- [24].W. X and Xilei Xie BT, Tang Fuyan, Shangguan Xiaoyan, Che Shiyi, Niu Jinye, Xiao Yongsheng, Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6520–6523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Liu C, Jiao X, He S, Zhao L, Zeng X, Dye. Pigment. 2017, 138, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
- [26].He L, Yang X, Ren M, Kong X, Liu Y, Lin W, Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 9582–9585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Xie Z, Ge J, Zhang H, Bai T, He S, Ling J, Sun H, Zhu Q, Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2017, 241, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Tang Y, Kong X, Xu A, Dong B, Lin W, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 3356–3359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Wu F, Zhang Y, Huang L, Xu D, Wang H, Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 5472–5477. [Google Scholar]
- [30].Lee YH, Tang Y, Verwilst P, Lin W, Kim JS, Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11247–11250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Tang Y, Kong X, Liu Z-R, Xu A, Lin W, Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 9359–9363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Song X, Han X, Yu F, Zhang J, Chen L, Lv C, Analyst 2018, 143, 429–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Liu W, Truillet C, Flavell RR, Brewer TF, Evans MJ, Wilson DM, Chang CJ, Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 5503–5507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Lippert AR, ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 269–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Hananya N, Shabat D, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 16454–16463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Dodeigne C, Thunus L, Lejeune R, Talanta 2000, 51, 415–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Gnaim S, Green O, Shabat D, Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 2073–2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Li X, Gao X, Shi W, Ma H, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 590–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Schaap AP, Chen T, Handley RS, Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar]
- [40].Thurnauer MC, Bowman MK, Cope BT, Norris JR, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 1966–1968. [Google Scholar]
- [41].Hananya N, Green O, Blau R, Satchi-Fainaro R, Shabat D, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11793–11796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Cao J, Lopez R, Thacker JM, Moon JY, Jiang C, Morris SNS, Bauer JH, Tao P, Mason RP, Lippert AR, Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 1979–1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Green O, Eilon T, Hananya N, Gutkin S, Bauer CR, Shabat D, ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 349–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Cao J, An W, Reeves AG, Lippert AR, Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 2552–2558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Sun S, Bao Z, Ma H, Zhang D, Zheng X, Biochemistry 2007, 46, 6668–6673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Roth-Konforti ME, Bauer CR, Shabat D, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 15633–15638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Cao J, Campbell J, Liu L, Mason RP, Lippert AR, Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 4995–5002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Green O, Gnaim S, Blau R, Eldar-Boock A, Satchi-Fainaro R, Shabat D, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13243–13248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Duong A, Steinmaus C, McHale CM, Vaughan CP, Zhang L, Mutat. Res. - Rev. Mutat. Res. 2011, 728, 118–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Scaglione F, Panzavolta G, Xenobiotica 2014, 44, 480–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.