Skip to main content
NCBI home page
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques logoLink to JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
. 2018 Oct 10;8(4):1-2. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with a Locking Plate Via Deltopectoral Approach for the Treatment of Three and Four-Part and Proximal Humeral Fractures

Jonathan Heath Thompson 1, Basem Attum 2, Andres Rodriguez-Buitrago 2, Kurt Yusi 2, Cesar Cereijo 2, William T Obremskey 2,✉
PMCID: PMC6358338  PMID: 30775132

Abstract

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) via the deltopectoral approach is the gold standard for operatively treated proximal humeral fractures when joint preservation is desired. Indications include an unacceptable deformity, need for stability and early mobilization, and osteoporotic bone. (1) A 12 to 14-cm incision is made in the deltopectoral groove. The fracture is reduced. (2) Pins and tension sutures are placed for provisional fixation. (3) The locking plate is placed with unicortical screws in the metaphysis of the proximal part of the humerus and bicortical screws in the shaft. (4) The rotator cuff tendon is sutured into the open suture holes of the plate. (5) The surgical wound is then closed in a layered fashion. Hertel et al. reported that calcar length <8 mm, disruption of the medial hinge, and complex fracture patterns are more predictive of future osteonecrosis. In a series of 34 patients managed with ORIF, Neviaser et al. showed that the length of the posteromedial hinge was not predictive of osteonecrosis. Additionally, with use of tetracycline labeling, Crosby et al. demonstrated that perfusion to the humeral head is maintained in more complex 3 and 4-part fractures following anatomic reduction. Although they are useful for surgical planning, the criteria proposed by Hertel et al. cannot accurately predict osteonecrosis. The most important predictor of ischemia is the length of the dorsomedial metaphyseal extension and the integrity of the medial hinge. Including medial support in the fixation greatly decreases the incidence of screw cutout and migration into the articular surface and increases functional outcomes. Proper and complete reduction is of the utmost importance because varus malreduction contributes to the loss of fixation and to technical complications, such as improper plate positioning, improper screw length, and screw cutout, that influence outcomes.

Download video file (15.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid1
Open in a new tab
Download video file (11.5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid2
Open in a new tab
Download video file (6.1MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid3
Open in a new tab
Download video file (25.3MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid4
Open in a new tab
Download video file (30.3MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid5
Open in a new tab
Download video file (8.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid6
Open in a new tab
Download video file (3.9MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid7
Open in a new tab
Download video file (17.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid8
Open in a new tab
Download video file (2.1MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid9
Open in a new tab
Download video file (4.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid10
Open in a new tab
Download video file (2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid11
Open in a new tab
Download video file (18.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid12
Open in a new tab
Download video file (41.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003.vid13
Open in a new tab

Footnotes

Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: JAMA. 2015;313(10):1037-47, J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(1):11-7, and Injury. 2011 Apr;42(4):408-13, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(4):489-94.

Disclosure: The authors indicated that no external funding was received for any aspect of this work. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A225).

References

  • 1.Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004. Jul-Aug;13(4):427-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Martin BC, Goodchild L, Chuang LH, Hewitt C, Torgerson D; PROFHER Trial Collaborators. Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015. March 10;313(10):1037-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ockert B, Braunstein V, Kirchhoff C, Körner M, Kirchhoff S, Kehr K, Mutschler W, Biberthaler P. Monoaxial versus polyaxial screw insertion in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: radiographic analysis of a prospective randomized study. J Trauma. 2010. December;69(6):1545-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Agudelo J, Schürmann M, Stahel P, Helwig P, Morgan SJ, Zechel W, Bahrs C, Parekh A, Ziran B, Williams A, Smith W. Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2007. Nov-Dec;21(10):676-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU, Kelly BT, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007. March;21(3):185-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang H, Li Z, Zhou F, Wang D, Zhong B. A prospective clinical study of proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking proximal humerus plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2011. January;25(1):11-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, Feeley BT. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. 2011. April;42(4):408-13. Epub 2010 Dec 19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clavert P, Adam P, Bevort A, Bonnomet F, Kempf JF. Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010. June;19(4):489-94. Epub 2009 Dec 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gupta AK, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Abrams GD, Bruce B, McCormick F, Nicholson GP, Romeo AA. Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures-a systematic review of 92 studies including 4500 patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2015. January;29(1):54-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jost B, Spross C, Grehn H, Gerber C. Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013. April;22(4):542-9. Epub 2012 Sep 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, Kohut G, Ekelund A, Muller M, Audigé L, Babst R. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009. March;23(3):163-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cuff DJ, Pupello DR. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. November 20;95(22):2050-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Klein M, Juschka M, Hinkenjann B, Scherger B, Ostermann PA. Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2008. Nov-Dec;22(10):698-704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009. February;95(1):48-55. Epub 2009 Feb 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ross M, Hope B, Stokes A, Peters SE, McLeod I, Duke PF. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three-part and four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015. February;24(2):215-22. Epub 2014 Aug 29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2008. March;22(3):159-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD. Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma. 2009. February;23(2):113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Egol KA, Sugi MT, Ong CC, Montero N, Davidovitch R, Zuckerman JD. Fracture site augmentation with calcium phosphate cement reduces screw penetration after open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012. June;21(6):741-8. Epub 2011 Dec 21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Neviaser AS, Hettrich CM, Dines JS, Lorich DG. Rate of avascular necrosis following proximal humerus fractures treated with a lateral locking plate and endosteal implant. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011. December;131(12):1617-22. Epub 2011 Aug 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crosby LA, Finnan RP, Anderson CG, Gozdanovic J, Miller MW. Tetracycline labeling as a measure of humeral head viability after 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009. Nov-Dec;18(6):851-8. Epub 2009 Mar 17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES