Abstract
Context
The prevalence of childhood obesity increased in the 1980s and 1990s but there were no significant changes in prevalence between 1999–2000 and 2007–2008 in the United States.
Objectives
To present the most recent estimates of obesity prevalence in US children and adolescents for 2009–2010 and to investigate trends in obesity prevalence and body mass index (BMI) among children and adolescents between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010.
Design, Setting, and Participant
Cross-sectional analyses of a representative sample (N=4111) of the US child and adolescent population (birth through 19 years of age) with measured heights and weights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2010.
Main Outcome Measures
Prevalence of high weight-for-recumbent length (≥95th percentile on the growth charts) among infants and toddlers from birth to 2 years of age and obesity (BMI ≥95th percentile of the BMI-for-age growth charts) among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years. Analyses of trends in obesity by sex and race/ethnicity, and analyses of trends in BMI within sex-specific age groups for 6 survey periods (1999–2000, 2001–2002, 2003–2004, 2005–2006, 2007–2008, and 2009–2010) over 12 years.
Results
In 2009–2010, 9.7% (95% CI, 7.6%−12.3%) of infants and toddlers had a high weight-for-recumbent length and 16.9% (95% CI, 15.4%−18.4%) of children and adolescents from 2 through 19 years of age were obese. There was no difference in obesity prevalence among males (P=.62) or females (P=.65) between 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. However, trend analyses over a 12-year period indicated a significant increase in obesity prevalence between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010 in males aged 2 through 19 years (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.10) but not in females (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98–1.07) per 2-year survey cycle. There was a significant increase in BMI among adolescent males aged 12 through 19 years (P=.04) but not among any other age group or among females.
Conclusion
In 2009–2010, the prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents was 16.9%; this was not changed compared with 2007–2008.
Childhood obesity continues to be a major focus of public health efforts in the United States.1 Obese children may be at risk for both short-term health consequences2 and long-term tracking of obesity to adulthood.3 In 2007–2008, 16.8% of US children and adolescents had a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) greater than or equal to the 95th percentile on the BMI-for-age growth charts and were considered obese. Although significant increases in obesity prevalence were seen in both sexes of children and adolescents during the 1980s and 1990s,4 between 1999–2000 and 2007–2008, significant increases were seen only at the highest cut point of BMI, corresponding to the 97th percentile, in 6- through 19-year-old males. No change at any cut point was seen in females.5
In epidemiological studies, obesity is often defined based on BMI. But trends in obesity prevalence based on a BMI cut point do not describe changes in BMI for the entire population. Trends in the distribution of BMI can show how the entire population has changed over time.
New US data on weight and height from 2009–2010 are now available. The purpose of this study was to analyze the most recent estimates of high weight-for-recumbent length or obesity prevalence in US infants, children, and adolescents for 2009–2010, to investigate trends in high weight-for-recumbent length or obesity prevalence among infants, children, and adolescents between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010, and to evaluate trends in BMI among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010.
METHODS
Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES),6 a complex multistage, area probability sample of the US noninstitutionalized population. NHANES is conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The survey consists of an at-home interview and a physical examination, which includes measurements of weight and height, at a mobile examination center. NHANES was approved by the National Center for Health Statistics Ethics Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from participants aged 12 years or older, and written child assent was obtained from those aged 7–11 years. Written parental consent was obtained for those younger than 18 years.
NHANES data have been collected continuously since 1999 and data are released in 2-year cycles. Between 1999–2000 and 2005–2006, Mexican Americans were oversampled. Beginning in 2007, all Hispanics were oversampled while allowing for a sufficient number of Mexican Americans. Race and ethnicity were self-reported with open-ended questions during the at-home interview. Participants could report multiple races; in this analysis, multiracial participants were classified as other.
There is no universally agreed on definition of obesity in infants and toddlers from birth to 2 years of age. Consequently, high weight in this age group is defined as weight-for-recumbent length at or above the 95th percentile on the CDC’s 2000 growth charts.7 This is consistent with the definition used for previously published estimates on infants and toddlers.5 Nonetheless, the CDC recommends the use of the World Health Organization’s growth charts to monitor growth in infants and toddlers younger than 2 years.8
Weight status among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years is defined based on BMI. In children and adolescents, overweight is defined as at or above the sex-specific 85th percentile on the CDC’s 2000 BMI-for-age growth charts but less than the 95th percentile; obesity is defined as a BMI at or above the sex-specific 95th percentile.9 Prevalence estimates at a higher cut point (≥97th percentile) also were studied. The percentage of school-aged children and adolescents with a BMI of 30 or greater (the adult definition of obesity10) also was estimated.
The prevalence of high weight-for-recumbent length and obesity in 2009–2010 were analyzed by sex, age, and racial/ethnic subgroups. Mean and median BMI for sex-specific age groups (2–5 years, 6–11 years, and 12–19 years) were investigated for 6 survey periods (1999–2000, 2001–2002, 2003–2004, 2005–2006, 2007–2008, and 2009–2010) over 12 years. Change in obesity prevalence and BMI distributions also were studied.
Analyses of trends in high weight-for-recumbent length and obesity prevalence were conducted using multiple logistic regression. The model for high weight-for-recumbent length among infants and toddlers was adjusted for sex, age, and race/ ethnicity. Trends in obesity for children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years were analyzed in sex-specific models, which were adjusted for age and race/ethnicity, and racial/ethnic-specific models, which were adjusted for age. These models were selected due to significant interactions between sex and race/ethnicity among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years. Using each of the 6 survey periods, linear trends were tested with survey period as both a continuous and a discrete variable in the models.
Analysis of potential changes in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years also were investigated by testing the difference in prevalence between 2009–2010 and earlier years grouped together. Details of 1999–2008 data have been previously published.4,5 Specifically, comparisons were performed with 2007–2008, 2003–2008, and 1999–2002 to determine whether there have been changes in the more recent years. These tests were conducted within regression models using survey period as a discrete variable with appropriate contrast matrices.
Differences by race/ethnicity and age were tested in the sex-specific multiple logistic regression models in which survey period was treated as a continuous variable. Interaction terms were not significant for survey period and age or survey period and race/ethnicity, suggesting that any differences by age or race/ethnicity in obesity prevalence have not changed between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010. Differences by sex were tested overall and within racial/ethnic groups using t tests.
Because BMI is not normally distributed, analyses of trends in BMI were conducted on the log-transformed BMI values in sex-specific multiple linear regression models, adjusted for age (in months) and race/ethnicity. All models were run separately for each sex-specific age group because of age and sex differences in BMI.
All P values for trend tests and differences over time were based on the Satterthwaite-adjusted F statistic.11 Odds ratios (ORs), which test for trends, were based on change between the 6 2-year survey periods.
Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc) and SAS callable SUDAAN version 10 (Research Triangle Institute). SUDAAN was used to allow for the complex sample design in the estimation of standard errors using the Taylor series linearization method and for statistical testing. Survey examination sample weights, which adjust for non-response, oversampling, and noncoverage, were used in estimating all statistics presented in the text. An overall α level of .05 was used to test all statistical hypotheses. Adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. The 95% confidence limits of the prevalence of high weight-for-recumbent length and high BMI for age were constructed using the logit transformation12 to avoid negative lower limits.
RESULTS
Of the children and adolescents from birth through 19 years of age selected to participate in the NHANES 2009–2010 survey, 88.6% were interviewed and 86.0% were interviewed and examined. Response rates across the survey cycles since 1999–2000 have been similar.13 The NHANES 2009–2010 sample sizes and weighted percentage distribution for each sex, age, and racial/ ethnic-specific subgroup appear in eTable 1 at http://www.jama.com. Of the 4183 examined children and adolescents, 72 were excluded because they had missing data. Thus, there were a total of 4111 children and adolescents from birth through 19 years of age in the sample; 1376 non-Hispanic white, 792 non-Hispanic black, and 1660 Hispanic children and adolescents. The smallest samples were non-Hispanic black infants and toddlers (51 males and 59 females).
The prevalence of high weight-for-recumbent length among infants and toddlers was 9.7% (95% CI, 7.6%−12.3%) in 2009–2010 (Table 1). When the data from 1999–2000 through 2009–2010 were analyzed together, there were significant differences by race/ethnicity, with Mexican Americans being significantly more likely to have high weight-for-recumbent length than non-Hispanic whites (adjusted for sex and survey period: OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.29–2.15]; eTable 2). In general, estimates of high weight-for-recumbent length based on the 97.7th percentile on the World Health Organization’s growth charts8 were slightly lower than the estimates presented in Table 1, but the World Health Organization–based estimates were within the confidence intervals in Table 1 (eTable 3).
Table 1.
Prevalence for 2009–2010 of High Weight-for-Recumbent Length in US Infants and Toddlers From Birth to 2 Years of Agea
| Infants and Toddlers, % (95% CI)b | |
|---|---|
| Allc | 9.7 (7.6–12.3) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 11.3 (7.9–15.9) |
| Female | 8.1 (5.3–12.2) |
| Race/ethnicity | |
| Non-Hispanic white | 8.4 (5.2–13.3) |
| Non-Hispanic black | 8.7 (4.6–16.0) |
| Hispanicd | 14.8 (11.3–19.2) |
| Mexican American | 15.7 (11.2–21.7) |
Data are from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. High weight-for-recumbent length indicates the 95th percentile or higher on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2000 growth charts. The data are weighted.
The confidence intervals were constructed using logit transformations.
Includes racial/ethnic groups not shown separately.
Includes Mexican Americans.
Among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years, 16.9% (95% CI, 15.4%−18.4%) were obese in 2009–2010 and 31.8% (95% CI, 29.8%−33.7%) were either overweight or obese (Table 2). Also, 12.3% (95% CI, 11.1%−13.5%) were at or above the 97th percentile of BMI for age.
Table 2.
Prevalence for 2009–2010 of High Body Mass Index (BMI) in US Children and Adolescents From 2 Through 19 Years of Agea
| Children and Adolescents by Age Group, % (95% CI)b |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By BMI Percentile | 2–19 y | 2–5 y | 6–19 y | 6–11 y | 12–19 y |
| Both Sexes | |||||
| All racial/ethnic groupsc | |||||
| ≥85th | 31.8 (29.8–33.7) | 26.7 (22.6–31.2) | 33.2 (31.2–35.3) | 32.6 (30.1–35.2) | 33.6 (30.9–36.5) |
| ≥95th | 16.9 (15.4–18.4) | 12.1 (9.9–14.8) | 18.2 (16.5–20.1) | 18.0 (16.3–19.8) | 18.4 (15.8–21.3) |
| ≥97th | 12.3 (11.1–13.5) | 9.7 (7.7–12.2) | 13.0 (11.7–14.4) | 13.0 (11.2–15.0) | 13.0 (10.9–15.4) |
| Hispanicd | |||||
| ≥85th | 31.8 (29.8–33.7) | 26.7 (22.6–31.2) | 33.2 (31.2–35.3) | 32.6 (30.1–35.2) | 33.6 (30.9–36.5) |
| ≥95th | 16.9 (15.4–18.4) | 12.1 (9.9–14.8) | 18.2 (16.5–20.1) | 18.0 (16.3–19.8) | 18.4 (15.8–21.3) |
| ≥97th | 12.3 (11.1–13.5) | 9.7 (7.7–12.2) | 13.0 (11.7–14.4) | 13.0 (11.2–15.0) | 13.0 (10.9–15.4) |
| Mexican American | |||||
| ≥85th | 39.4 (35.8–43.1) | 33.3 (28.2–38.9) | 41.4 (36.4–46.6) | 39.0 (33.3–45.1) | 43.4 (36.6–50.4) |
| ≥95th | 21.2 (18.8–23.8) | 15.5 (11.9–20.0) | 23.1 (20.1–26.3) | 22.1 (18.8–25.8) | 23.9 (18.2–30.6) |
| ≥97th | 15.5 (13.6–17.7) | 11.9 (8.4–16.6) | 16.7 (14.7–19.0) | 17.5 (13.9–21.7) | 16.1 (12.2–20.8) |
| Non-Hispanic white | |||||
| ≥85th | 27.9 (25.1–31.0) | 23.8 (17.9–31.0) | 29.0 (25.8–32.4) | 27.6 (23.6–31.9) | 30.0 (25.4–34.9) |
| ≥95th | 14.0 (11.7–16.7) | 9.2 (6.0–14.0) | 15.2 (12.5–18.4) | 13.9 (11.1–17.3) | 16.1 (12.6–20.5) |
| ≥97th | 9.8 (8.0–12.0) | 7.5 (4.6–12.0) | 10.4 (8.3–12.9) | 9.1 (6.7–12.3) | 11.3 (8.4–15.0) |
| Non-Hispanic black | |||||
| ≥85th | 39.1 (35.5–42.8) | 28.9 (21.8–37.3) | 41.8 (38.3–45.4) | 42.7 (36.2–49.4) | 41.2 (35.0–47.8) |
| ≥95th | 24.3 (20.5–28.6) | 18.9 (12.5–27.5) | 25.7 (21.7–30.2) | 28.6 (22.0–36.2) | 23.7 (19.2–29.0) |
| ≥97th | 18.6 (15.4–22.2) | 14.4 (9.1–22.2) | 19.7 (16.5–23.4) | 22.2 (16.9–28.6) | 18.0 (14.1–22.6) |
| Males | |||||
| All racial/ethnic groupsc | |||||
| ≥85th | 33.0 (30.5–35.6) | 29.7 (24.0–36.1) | 34.0 (30.5–37.6) | 33.1 (30.0–36.3) | 34.6 (29.2–40.5) |
| ≥95th | 18.6 (16.4–21.0) | 14.4 (11.0–18.6) | 19.8 (16.9–23.1) | 20.1 (18.0–22.4) | 19.6 (15.2–25.0) |
| ≥97th | 13.9 (12.2–15.9) | 11.5 (8.4–15.4) | 14.7 (12.5–17.1) | 14.6 (11.9–17.9) | 14.7 (11.2–19.0) |
| Hispanicd | |||||
| ≥85th | 39.6 (35.7–43.5) | 34.1 (29.2–39.3) | 41.5 (35.8–47.4) | 39.7 (34.2–45.5) | 42.9 (33.8–52.5) |
| ≥95th | 23.4 (20.5–26.6) | 17.8 (13.6–23.1) | 25.3 (21.8–29.2) | 23.9 (20.5–27.7) | 26.5 (19.9–34.3) |
| ≥97th | 17.6 (15.0–20.5) | 14.1 (10.6–18.4) | 18.8 (16.1–21.9) | 18.3 (13.7–24.2) | 19.2 (15.0–24.3) |
| Mexican American | |||||
| ≥85th | 40.5 (35.2–46.0) | 34.0 (25.5–43.7) | 42.6 (35.6–49.8) | 38.5 (32.2–45.2) | 46.0 (33.8–58.8) |
| ≥95th | 24.0 (20.6–27.8) | 19.1 (13.5–26.4) | 25.6 (21.6–30.2) | 21.8 (16.6–28.2) | 28.9 (19.8–40.1) |
| ≥97th | 18.2 (14.5–22.5) | 15.0 (10.2–21.5) | 19.2 (15.4–23.7) | 18.0 (11.7–26.9) | 20.2 (14.7–27.1) |
| Non-Hispanic white | |||||
| ≥85th | 30.1 (26.2–34.3) | 26.0 (17.4–36.8) | 31.1 (25.9–36.9) | 29.7 (25.6–34.1) | 32.2 (23.9–41.8) |
| ≥95th | 16.1 (12.6–20.3) | 11.9 (7.3–18.9) | 17.2 (13.0–22.5) | 16.8 (13.2–21.3) | 17.5 (11.5–25.8) |
| ≥97th | 11.6 (9.0–15.0) | 9.3 (5.1–16.2) | 12.3 (9.0–16.5) | 11.1 (7.1–16.9) | 13.1 (8.4–19.9) |
| Non-Hispanic black | |||||
| ≥85th | 36.9 (31.1–43.1) | 30.5 (19.6–44.1) | 38.8 (31.6–46.5) | 40.9 (31.0–51.7) | 37.4 (28.4–47.3) |
| ≥95th | 24.3 (18.7–30.8) | 20.5 (10.6–36.0) | 25.4 (18.7–33.5) | 29.5 (17.1–45.8) | 22.6 (17.1–29.3) |
| ≥97th | 19.4 (14.5–25.4) | 16.1 (7.9–30.0) | 20.3 (14.9–27.1) | 23.4 (14.2–36.0) | 18.3 (13.8–23.9) |
| Females | |||||
| All racial/ethnic groupsc | |||||
| ≥85th | 30.4 (28.4–32.5) | 23.4 (18.5–29.2) | 32.4 (30.0–34.8) | 32.1 (28.5–35.8) | 32.6 (28.0–37.6) |
| ≥95th | 15.0 (13.3–16.8) | 9.6 (6.6–13.8) | 16.5 (14.7–18.5) | 15.7 (13.7–18.0) | 17.1 (14.4–20.1) |
| ≥97th | 10.5 (9.2–12.0) | 7.9 (5.0–12.2) | 11.2 (9.8–12.9) | 11.3 (9.4–13.4) | 11.2 (9.2–13.7) |
| Hispanicd | |||||
| ≥85th | 38.6 (34.9–42.4) | 32.1 (23.3–42.3) | 40.9 (37.3–44.6) | 39.6 (32.4–47.3) | 41.9 (36.5–47.5) |
| ≥95th | 18.9 (15.4–22.9) | 14.6 (9.3–22.0) | 20.4 (17.0–24.2) | 21.0 (15.8–27.4) | 19.8 (15.0–25.8) |
| ≥97th | 13.5 (10.7–16.8) | 11.9 (7.4–18.5) | 14.0 (11.2–17.4) | 14.5 (10.7–19.3) | 13.6 (9.6–18.8) |
| Mexican American | |||||
| ≥85th | 38.2 (33.8–42.8) | 32.7 (22.7–44.6) | 40.1 (35.7–44.6) | 39.5 (31.3–48.4) | 40.5 (35.0–46.3) |
| ≥95th | 18.2 (13.4–24.2) | 11.9 (6.1–21.9) | 20.3 (15.8–25.8) | 22.4 (16.2–30.2) | 18.6 (12.8–26.2) |
| ≥97th | 12.7 (9.3–17.2) | 8.8 (4.4–16.9)e | 14.0 (10.5–18.6) | 16.8 (11.8–23.4) | 11.7 (7.6–17.6) |
| Non-Hispanic white | |||||
| ≥85th | 25.6 (22.9–28.4) | 21.3 (14.4–30.4) | 26.6 (23.5–30.0) | 25.2 (18.9–32.7) | 27.6 (20.8–35.7) |
| ≥95th | 11.7 (9.5–14.2) | 6.0 (2.9–12.1)e | 13.0 (10.5–16.1) | 10.7 (7.6–14.7) | 14.7 (11.0–19.4) |
| ≥97th | 7.8 (5.9–10.1) | 5.4 (2.4–12.0) | 8.3 (6.1–11.3) | 7.0 (4.7–10.1) | 9.3 (5.7–14.8) |
| Non-Hispanic black | |||||
| ≥85th | 41.3 (37.0–45.7) | 27.0 (19.9–35.6) | 44.7 (39.9–49.7) | 44.2 (36.4–52.4) | 45.1 (37.5–52.9) |
| ≥95th | 24.3 (19.2–30.3) | 17.0 (8.3–31.7)e | 26.1 (21.0–32.0) | 27.8 (20.5–36.5) | 24.8 (19.0–31.8) |
| ≥97th | 17.8 (13.9–22.5) | 12.4 (5.9–24.2)e | 19.1 (15.0–24.1) | 21.1 (13.9–30.7) | 17.6 (12.4–24.3) |
Data are from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was rounded to 1 decimal place and percentiles are from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2000 growth charts. The data are weighted.
The confidence intervals were constructed using logit transformations.
Includes racial/ethnic groups not shown separately.
Includes Mexican Americans.
Does not meet the standard of statistical reliability and precision (relative standard error ≥30% but <40%).
The prevalence of obesity among male children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years (18.6%) was significantly higher than among female children and adolescents (15.0%) (P=.01). Among non-Hispanic white children and adolescents, the prevalence among males was 16.1%, which was significantly higher (P=.02) than among females (11.7%). There were no significant differences by sex among Hispanic (P=.13) or non-Hispanic black (P=.99) children and adolescents.
In 2009–2010, the prevalence of obesity was 12.1% (95% CI, 9.9%−14.8%) among children aged 2 through 5 years, 18.0% (95% CI, 16.3%−19.8%) among children aged 6 through 11 years, and 18.4% (95% CI, 15.8%−21.3%) among adolescents aged 12 through 19 years (Table 2). Among adolescents aged 12 through 19 years, 13.9% (95% CI, 11.5%−16.6%) met the adult definition of obesity with a BMI of 30 or greater. This included 12.2% (95% CI, 9.5%−15.5%) of non-Hispanic white, 15.8% (95% CI, 13.4%−18.5%) of Hispanic, and 21.4% (95% CI, 16.6-%27%) of non-Hispanic black adolescents.
Significant differences in obesity prevalence by race/ethnicity were found. In 2009–2010, 21.2% (95% CI, 19.5%−23.0%) of Hispanic children and adolescents and 24.3% (95% CI, 20.5%−28.6%) of non-Hispanic black children and adolescents were obese compared with 14.0% (95% CI, 11.7%−16.7%) of non-Hispanic white children and adolescents (Table 2).
During the past 12 years (1999–2010), the odds of being obese were significantly higher for non-Hispanic black males (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09–1.48) and females (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.69–2.35) and Mexican American males (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.56–2.09) and females (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23–1.76) compared with both non-Hispanic white males and females after controlling for age and survey period (Table 3). When combining all survey years together, children aged 2 through 5 years had a lower odds of obesity (males: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48–0.70; females: OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51–0.74) compared with adolescents aged 12 through 19 years (Table 3) after adjusting for survey period and race/ ethnicity. The odds of obesity were not significantly different for children aged 6 through 11 years compared with adolescents aged 12 through 19 years (males: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.90–1.15; females: OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82–1.08).
Table 3.
Odds of Obesity in 1999–2010a
| Odds Ratio (95% CI)b |
||
|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | |
| Age group, y | ||
| 2–5 | 0.58 (0.48–0.70) | 0.62 (0.51–0.74) |
| 6–11 | 1.02 (0.90–1.15) | 0.95 (0.82–1.08) |
| 12–19 | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| Race/ethnicity | ||
| Non-Hispanic white | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| Non-Hispanic black | 1.27 (1.09–1.48) | 1.99 (1.69–2.35) |
| Mexican American | 1.81 (1.56–2.09) | 1.47 (1.23–1.76) |
| Survey period, per 2-y survey cycle | 1.05 (1.01–1.10) | 1.02 (0.98–1.07) |
Data are from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Obesity was defined as body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) for age equal to or greater than the sex-specific 95th percentile on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2000 growth charts. The data are weighted.
The odds ratios are based on logistic regression of obesity.
The prevalence of high weight-for-recumbent length among infants and toddlers did not change between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010 (P=.97). Figure 1 shows the trends by race/ ethnicity.
Figure 1.
High Weight-for-Recumbent Length in US Infants and Toddlers From Birth to 2 Years of Age
Data are weighted.
Trend analyses over a 12-year period, however, indicate a significant trend in obesity prevalence between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010 in male children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.10) but not in females (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98–1.07) per 2-year survey cycle. This translates into an annual increase in the odds of obesity prevalence of 1.03 (95% CI, 1.01–1.05) for males and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.99–1.03) for females. Results of trend tests based on analysis of survey period as a discrete variable were consistent with results based on survey period as a continuous variable; a significant increase in obesity prevalence over time was seen among males but no change was seen among females. Racial/ ethnic-specific trend tests for males and females showed a significant increasing trend for non-Hispanic black males (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03–1.17), translating to an annual increase in the odds of obesity prevalence of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02–1.08). No other racial/ethnic-specific trends were significant. Figure 2 shows obesity trends in males and females by racial/ethnicity.
Figure 2.
Prevalence of Obesity in US Males and Females Aged 2 Through 19 Years
Data are weighted.
There was no difference in obesity prevalence for males (P = .62) or females (P=.65) between 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. Similarly, comparison of 2009–2010 estimates with 2003–2008 showed no significant change among males (P = .35) or females (P = .64). There was a significant change between 1999–2002 and 2009–2010 among males (P=.009) but not among females (P=.45). The significant change found in males between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010 is due to the change between 1999–2002 and 2009–2010.
Table 4 contains trends in mean and median BMI among children and adolescents aged 2 through 5 years, 6 through 11 years, and 12 through 19 years for the 6 survey periods between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010. Regression models indicate a significant change in BMI only among adolescent males aged 12 through 19 years (P=.04) but not among males in the other age groups (P=.36 for those aged 2–5 years; P=.42 for those aged 6–11 years) or among females in any age group during the 12-year period. eFigures 1–3 show the change in the smoothed distribution of BMI between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010 for males and females in the 3 age groups.
Table 4.
Trends in Mean and Median Body Mass Index Among Children and Adolescents From 2 Through 19 Years of Agea
| Body Mass Indexb |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| By Age Group | Unweighted Sample Size | Mean (95% CI)c | Median (IQR) |
| Males | |||
| 2–5 y | |||
| 1999–2000 | 374 | 16.2 (15.9–16.5) | 16.0 (1.7) |
| 2001–2002 | 383 | 16.5 (16.1–16.9) | 16.1 (1.8) |
| 2003–2004 | 402 | 16.7 (16.4–16.9) | 16.3 (2.1) |
| 2005–2006 | 473 | 16.3 (16.1–16.5) | 16.0 (1.9) |
| 2007–2008 | 465 | 16.3 (16.1–16.5) | 16.0 (1.8) |
| 2009–2010 | 471 | 16.6 (16.4–16.8) | 16.2 (2.1) |
| 6–11 y | |||
| 1999–2000 | 542 | 17.9 (17.4–18.4) | 17.0 (3.8) |
| 2001–2002 | 581 | 18.5 (17.9–19.0) | 17.2 (4.5) |
| 2003–2004 | 463 | 18.4 (18.0–18.9) | 17.1 (4.9) |
| 2005–2006 | 550 | 18.2 (17.8–18.6) | 17.0 (3.5) |
| 2007–2008 | 595 | 18.6 (18.0–19.1) | 17.2 (5.2) |
| 2009–2010 | 621 | 18.3 (18.2–18.5) | 17.0 (5.0) |
| 12–19 y | |||
| 1999–2000 | 1155 | 22.9 (22.3–23.4) | 21.6 (6.1) |
| 2001–2002 | 1162 | 23.1 (22.7–23.4) | 21.8 (6.1) |
| 2003–2004 | 1139 | 23.4 (22.7–24.1) | 22.1 (6.8) |
| 2005–2006 | 1091 | 23.2 (22.4–23.9) | 21.8 (6.3) |
| 2007–2008 | 641 | 23.5 (22.8–24.2) | 22.1 (7.0) |
| 2009–2010 | 685 | 23.8 (23.1–24.5) | 22.5 (6.5) |
| Females | |||
| 2–5 y | |||
| 1999–2000 | 352 | 16.1 (15.8–16.4) | 15.7 (1.9) |
| 2001–2002 | 412 | 16.1 (15.9–16.4) | 15.8 (2.2) |
| 2003–2004 | 417 | 16.3 (16.0–16.6) | 15.9 (2.0) |
| 2005–2006 | 479 | 16.2 (16.1–16.4) | 15.9 (1.8) |
| 2007–2008 | 388 | 16.3 (15.9–16.6) | 15.9 (1.7) |
| 2009–2010 | 432 | 16.2 (16.0–16.5) | 15.8 (2.0) |
| 6–11 y | |||
| 1999–2000 | 506 | 18.0 (17.5–18.6) | 16.7 (4.7) |
| 2001–2002 | 584 | 18.4 (17.7–19.1) | 17.3 (4.6) |
| 2003–2004 | 519 | 18.9 (18.6–19.3) | 17.5 (5.4) |
| 2005–2006 | 564 | 18.2 (17.7–18.7) | 17.0 (4.2) |
| 2007–2008 | 602 | 18.5 (18.0–19.0) | 17.1 (5.1) |
| 2009–2010 | 592 | 18.5 (18.2–18.8) | 17.4 (4.8) |
| 12–19 y | |||
| 1999–2000 | 1110 | 23.3 (22.8–23.8) | 21.9 (5.9) |
| 2001–2002 | 1139 | 23.1 (22.6–23.6) | 21.6 (6.1) |
| 2003–2004 | 1021 | 23.6 (22.8–24.4) | 22.0 (6.1) |
| 2005–2006 | 1050 | 23.6 (23.0–24.2) | 21.8 (7.1) |
| 2007–2008 | 558 | 23.4 (22.7–24.0) | 22.0 (6.3) |
| 2009–2010 | 607 | 23.6 (23.1–24.2) | 22.2 (6.4) |
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range (75th percentile-25th percentile).
Data are from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. All data except sample size are weighted.
Calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared and rounded to 1 decimal place.
The confidence intervals were constructed using the Wald method.
COMMENT
In 2009–2010, 16.9% of US children and adolescents were obese. Obesity prevalence continues to be higher among non-Hispanic black and Hispanic children and adolescents than among non-Hispanic white youth. There was no change in obesity prevalence between 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. Overall trends in obesity prevalence between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010 among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years were significant for males but not for females. Similarly, trends in BMI indicate a significant increase among adolescent males but not females of any age. This is consistent with previously published results showing an increase in prevalence of BMI for age at or above the 97th percentile among males but no change in females at any cutoff based on data through 2007–2008.5
NHANES has consistently reported significant differences in obesity prevalence by race/ethnicity. Obesity, however, is defined based on BMI, which is an imperfect measure of body fat. Although BMI is highly correlated with body fat at the higher BMI levels,14 non-Hispanic black children have significantly lower levels of body fat than do Mexican American or non-Hispanic white children at the same BMI level.15 Consequently the racial or ethnic differences in obesity prevalence based on a BMI cut point, as shown in this analysis, may not represent actual differences in body fat. It is not clear, however, if body fatness is a stronger predictor of obesity-related health outcomes than is BMI.16
Because different definitions of obesity in children and adolescents are used throughout the world, it can be difficult to compare estimates in the United States with those in other countries. Nonetheless, estimates of childhood obesity in the United States tend to be higher than in other countries. Based on data from 2004 in Canada, a comparable obesity prevalence among adolescents aged 12 through 19 years was 11.7%; data from 2006 in Mexico indicated a prevalence of 11.5%.17 This compares with an 18.4% obesity prevalence among adolescents aged 12 through 19 years in the United States in 2009–2010.
Childhood obesity continues to increase in some countries while in other countries or US subgroups it has apparently plateaued. In Ontario, Canada, the prevalence of obesity among adolescents aged 14 through 15 years increased significantly between 2002 and 2008.18 In contrast, a recently published review of studies found that there had been almost no change in childhood obesity prevalence in Australia between 1996 and 2008.19 In primary school−aged children in France,20 there was no statistically significant increase in obesity prevalence between 2000 and 2007; in Switzerland,21 there was a decrease in obesity prevalence among children aged 6 through 13 years between 2002 and 2007. Reports of lowincome children participating in nutrition assistance programs in the United States have indicated no change or a slight decrease in the prevalence of obesity between the early 2000s and 2007 or 2008.22,23
Similar to the results reported herein, sex differences in trends in BMI and obesity among children have been reported by others. In a study of German children and adolescents between 1999 and 2006, Meigen et al24 found that a significant increase in childhood obesity was more pronounced in boys than in girls. In Iwata City, Japan, Kouda et al25 found that based on annual data for fifth graders between 1993 and 2008, the 95th percentile of BMI increased in boys but not girls. And, in Sweden there is evidence that the prevalence of overweight plus obesity decreased in girls and remained stable in boys between 2000–2001 and 2004–2005.26
Changes in the distribution of BMI among US children between the 1960s and 1988–1994 have been reported.27 Mean difference plots for adolescent males and females by single year of age showed that the distribution of BMI became more skewed during that period. Similarly, Kromeyer-Hauschild and Zellner28 published graphical representations of changes in BMI, although not as dramatic as in the United States, among school children in Jena, East Germany, between 1995 and 2001. Changes in BMI percentile values also have been reported in German preschool-aged children. Using changes in upper percentile values, but not the lower, Kalies et al29 showed that the distribution of BMI between 1982 and 1997 became more skewed among preschool-aged children in Bavaria. Similarly, Ekblom et al30 reported shifts in the BMI distribution among Swedish children between 1987 and 2001. No reports have documented changes in the distribution of BMI among US children and adolescents in the last decade.
A strength of the NHANES is the measurement of weight and height. Reported weights and heights are not as accurate as actual measurements. Adolescent self-reported data result in underestimates of the prevalence of obesity, with reporting inaccuracies varying by sex and weight status.31
The main limitation to this study is the relatively small sample size based on 2 years of NHANES data and a potential concern over the power to detect changes in the prevalence of obesity. As was previously reported, NHANES was designed to detect a 10% difference between proportions with 80% power, a design effect of 1.5, and a sample size of approximately 420.5 In our analysis, there was a 3 percentage point difference in childhood obesity prevalence between 1999–2000 and 2009–2010. To detect a change of this magnitude with 80% power requires a sample size of approximately 4000.
The definition of obesity in children is statistical based on a comparison to the reference population of the CDC growth charts. The charts were created for comparison within specific sex and age groups not across sex and age groups. Sex or age differences in prevalence in 2009–2010 may reflect differences in the original reference population.
Many efforts both at the national level1 and at state and local levels32 focus on reducing childhood obesity. Yet results from NHANES indicate that the prevalence of childhood obesity in the United States remains unchanged at approximately 17%, although increases in obesity prevalence may be occurring among males. Some have suggested33 that the prevalence of obesity among children will reach 30% by 2030, but the data presented herein suggest that the rapid increases in obesity prevalence seen in the 1980s and 1990s have not continued in this decade and may be leveling off. More research is needed to understand why these changes may be occurring.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and not necessarily of the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Online-Only Material: The 3 eTables and 3 eFigures are available at http://www.jama.com.
REFERENCES
- 1.Office of President; US Department of Health and Human Services; US Department of Agriculture; US Department of Education; US Department of the Interior. Let’s Move Web site. http://www.letsmove.gov. Accessibility verified December 29, 2011.
- 2.Freedman DS, Mei Z, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS, Dietz WH. Cardiovascular risk factors and excess adiposity among overweight children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr. 2007;150(1):12–17, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Singh AS, Mulder C, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):474–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002; 288(14):1728–1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA. 2010; 303(3):242–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes_questionnaires.htm Accessibility verified December 29, 2011.
- 7.Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, et al. 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002;246(246): 1–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinold C, Krebs NF; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0–59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-9):1–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ogden CL, Flegal KM. Changes in terminology for childhood overweight and obesity. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2010;(25):1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(suppl 2):51S–209S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Skinner CJ, Holt D, Smith TMF. Analysis of Complex Surveys. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wolters KM. Introduction to Variance Estimation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1982. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention /National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey response rates. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/response_rates_CPS.htm Accessibility verified December 29, 2011.
- 14.Freedman DS, Wang J, Maynard LM, et al. Relation of BMI to fat and fat-free mass among children and adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005;29(1):1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Flegal KM, Ogden CL, Yanovski JA, et al. High adiposity and high body mass index-for-age in US children and adolescents overall and by race-ethnic group. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(4):1020–1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Freedman DS, Katzmarzyk PT, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Relation of body mass index and skinfold thicknesses to cardiovascular disease risk factors in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(1):210–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ogden CL, Connor GS, Rivera Dommarco J, Carroll MD, Shields M, Flegal KM. The epidemiology of childhood obesity in Canada, Mexico and the United States In: Moreno L, Pigeot I, Ahrens W, eds. Epidemiology of Obesity in Children and Adolescents— Prevalence and Etiology. New York, NY: Springer; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 18.McCrindle BW, Manlhiot C, Millar K, et al. Population trends toward increasing cardiovascular risk factors in Canadian adolescents. J Pediatr. 2010;157(5):837–843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Olds TS, Tomkinson GR, Ferrar KE, Maher CA. Trends in the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity in Australia between 1985 and 2008. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010;34(1):57–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Salanave B, Peneau S, Rolland-Cachera MF, Hercberg S, Castetbon K. Stabilization of overweight prevalence in French children between 2000 and 2007. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009;4(2):66–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aeberli I, Ammann RS, Knabenhans M, Molinari L, Zimmermann MB. Decrease in the prevalence of paediatric adiposity in Switzerland from 2002 to 2007. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(6):806–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Obesity prevalence among low-income, preschoolaged children—United States, 1998–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(28):769–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sekhobo JP, Edmunds LS, Reynolds DK, Dalenius K, Sharma A. Trends in prevalence of obesity and overweight among children enrolled in the New York State WIC program, 2002–2007. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(2):218–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meigen C, Keller A, Gausche R, et al. Secular trends in body mass index in German children and adolescents: a cross-sectional data analysis via CrescNet between 1999 and 2006. Metabolism. 2008;57(7):934–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kouda K, Nakamura H, Nishio N, Fujita Y, Takeuchi H, Iki M. Trends in body mass index, blood pressure, and serum lipids in Japanese children: Iwata population based annual screening (1993–2008). J Epidemiol. 2010;20(3):212–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sjöberg A, Lissner L, Albertsson-Wikland K, Mårild S. Recent anthropometric trends among Swedish school children: evidence for decreasing prevalence of over-weight in girls. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(1):118123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Flegal KM, Troiano RP. Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(7):807–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kromeyer-Hauschild K, Zellner K. Trends in overweight and obesity and changes in the distribution of body mass index in schoolchildren of Jena, East Germany. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61(3):404–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kalies H, Lenz J, von Kries R. Prevalence of overweight and obesity and trends in body mass index in German pre-school children, 1982–1997. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26(9):1211–1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ekblom O, Oddsson K, Ekblom B. Prevalence and regional differences in overweight in 2001 and trends in BMI distribution in Swedish children from 1987 to 2001. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(4):257–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sherry B, Jefferds ME, Grummer-Strawn LM. Accuracy of adolescent self-report of height and weight in assessing overweight status: a literature review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(12):1154–1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Statebased programs. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/stateprograms/index.html Accessibility verified December 29, 2011.
- 33.Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L, Caballero B, Kumanyika SK. Will all Americans become overweight or obese? estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(10):2323–2330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.