Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2019 Jan 18;75(Pt 2):223–227. doi: 10.1107/S205698901900063X

Sodium rubidium hydrogen citrate, NaRbHC6H5O7, and sodium caesium hydrogen citrate, NaCsHC6H5O7: crystal structures and DFT comparisons

Andrew J Cigler a, James A Kaduk a,*
PMCID: PMC6362649  PMID: 30800455

The crystal structures of sodium rubidium hydrogen citrate and sodium caesium hydrogen citrate have been solved and refined using laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data, and optimized using density functional techniques. In NaRbHC6H5O7, the Na and Rb cation coordination spheres form triple chains along the a-axis direction, and chains of very strong O—H—O hydrogen bonds run along [111], while in NaCsHC6H5O7 the Na and Cs coordination polyhedra form layers parallel to (101), and there are chains of very short and strong hydrogen bonds along [100].

Keywords: powder diffraction, density functional theory, citrate, sodium, rubidium, caesium, crystal structure

Abstract

The crystal structure of sodium rubidium hydrogen citrate, NaRbHC6H5O7 or [NaRb(C6H6O7)]n, has been solved and refined using laboratory powder X-ray diffraction data, and optimized using density functional techniques. This compound is isostructural to NaKHC6H5O7. The Na atom is six-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.16. The Rb atom is eight-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.17. The distorted [NaO6] octa­hedra share edges to form chains along the a-axis direction. The irregular [RbO8] coordination polyhedra share edges with the [NaO6] octa­hedra on either side of the chain, and share corners with other Rb atoms, resulting in triple chains along the a-axis direction. The most prominent feature of the structure is the chain along [111] of very short, very strong hydrogen bonds; the O⋯O distances are 2.426 and 2.398 Å. The Mulliken overlap populations in these hydrogen bonds are 0.140 and 0.143 electrons, which correspond to hydrogen-bond energies of about 20.3 kcal mol−1. The crystal structure of sodium caesium hydrogen citrate, NaCsHC6H5O7 or [NaCs(C6H6O7)]n, has also been solved and refined using laboratory powder X-ray diffraction data, and optimized using density functional techniques. The Na atom is six-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.15. The Cs atom is eight-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 0.97. The distorted trigonal–prismatic [NaO6] coordination polyhedra share edges to form zigzag chains along the b-axis direction. The irregular [CsO8] coordination polyhedra share edges with the [NaO6] polyhedra to form layers parallel to the (101) plane, unlike the isolated chains in NaKHC6H5O7 and NaRbHC6H5O7. A prominent feature of the structure is the chain along [100] of very short, very strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds; the refined O⋯O distances are 2.398 and 2.159 Å, and the optimized distances are 2.398 and 2.347 Å. The Mulliken overlap populations in these hydrogen bonds are 0.143 and 0.133 electrons, which correspond to hydrogen-bond energies about 20.3 kcal mol−1.

Chemical context  

A systematic study of the crystal structures of Group 1 (alkali metal) citrate salts has been reported in Rammohan & Kaduk (2018). The study was extended to lithium metal hydrogen citrates in Cigler & Kaduk (2018). The two title compounds (Figs. 1 and 2) are a further extension to citrates that contain more than one alkali metal cation.graphic file with name e-75-00223-scheme1.jpg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The asymmetric unit of NaRbHC6H5O7, with the atom numbering and 50% probability spheroids.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The asymmetric unit of NaCsHC6H5O7, with the atom numbering and 50% probability spheroids.

Structural commentary  

Sodium rubidium hydrogen citrate is isostructural to NaKHC6H5O7 (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2016). Sodium caesium hydrogen citrate has a related but different structure. The root-mean-square deviations of the non-hydrogen atoms in the refined and optimized structures are 0.116 and 0.105 Å for NaRbHC6H5O7 and NaCsHC6H5O7, respectively. Comparisons of the refined and optimized structures are given in Figs. 3 and 4. The excellent agreement between the structures is strong evidence that the experimental structures are correct (van de Streek & Neumann, 2014). This discussion uses the DFT-optimized structures. All of the citrate bond distances, bond angles, and torsion angles fall within the normal ranges indicated by a Mercury Mogul Geometry Check (Macrae et al., 2008). The citrate anion in both structures occurs in the trans,trans-conformation (about C2—C3 and C3—C4), which is one of the two low-energy conformations of an isolated citrate (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2018). The central carboxyl­ate group and the hy­droxy group occur in the normal planar arrangement.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of the refined and optimized structures of sodium rubidium hydrogen citrate. The refined structure is in red, and the DFT-optimized structure is in blue.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of the refined and optimized structures of sodium caesium hydrogen citrate. The refined structure is in red, and the DFT-optimized structure is in blue.

In the Rb compound, the citrate chelates to Na19 through the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen O11 and the central carboxyl­ate oxygen O16. The Na+ cation is six-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.16. The Rb+ cation is eight-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.17. Both cations are thus slightly crowded.

In the Cs compound, the citrate triply chelates to Na20 through the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen O12, the central carboxyl­ate oxygen O15, and the hydroxyl oxygen O17. The Na+ cation is six-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.15. The Cs+ cation is eight-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 0.97. The Rb—O and Cs—O bonds are ionic, but the Na—O bonds have slight covalent character, according to the Mulliken overlap populations.

The Bravais–Friedel–Donnay–Harker (Bravais, 1866; Friedel, 1907; Donnay & Harker, 1937) method suggests that we might expect a platy morphology for NaRbHC6H5O7, with {001} as the principal faces, and an elongated morphology for NaCsHC6H5O7, with {010} as the long axis. Fourth-order spherical harmonic preferred orientation models were included in the refinements; the texture indices were 1.050 and 1.011, indicating that preferred orientation was slight for the rotated flat-plate specimen of NaRbHC6H5O7, but not significant in this rotated capillary specimen of NaCsHC6H5O7. Examination of the products under an optical microscope indicated that the morphologies were not especially anisotropic.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal structure of NaRbHC6H5O7 (Fig. 5), distorted [NaO6] octa­hedra share edges to form chains along the a-axis direction. The irregular [RbO8] coordination polyhedra share edges with the [NaO6] octa­hedra on either side of the chain, resulting in triple chains along the a-axis direction. The most prominent feature of the structure is the chain along [111] of very short, very strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1); the refined O⋯O distances are 2.180 (9) and 2.234 (20) Å, and the optimized distances are 2.426 and 2.398 Å. The Mulliken overlap populations in these hydrogen bonds are 0.140 and 0.143 electrons, which correspond to hydrogen-bond energies about 20.6 kcal mol−1, according to the correlation in Rammohan & Kaduk (2018). H18 forms bifurcated hydrogen bonds: one is intra­molecular to O15, and the other is inter­molecular to O11.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Crystal structure of NaRbHC6H5O7, viewed down the a axis.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry for [NaRb(C6H6O7)].

D—H⋯A D—H(Å) H⋯A(Å) DA(Å) D—H⋯A(°) Mulliken overlap(electrons) H-bond energy(kcal mol−1)
O13—H22⋯O13i 1.199 1.199 2.398 180.0 0.143 20.7
O11—H21⋯O11ii 1.213 1.213 2.426 180.0 0.140 20.5
O17—H18⋯O15 0.979 1.873 2.575 126.2 0.059 13.3
O17—H18⋯O11iii 0.979 2.507 3.180 125.8 0.016 6.9
C2—H8⋯O14iv 1.094 2.478 3.541 163.7 0.018  

Symmetry codes: (i) 2 − x, 2 − y, 2 − z; (ii) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (iii) 1 + x, y, z; (iv) x − 1, y, z.

In the crystal structure of NaCsHC6H5O7 (Fig. 6), distorted trigonal–prismatic [NaO6] share edges to form zigzig chains along the b-axis direction. The irregular [CsO8] coordination polyhedra share edges with the [NaO6] polyhedra to form layers parallel to the (101) plane, unlike the isolated chains in NaKHC6H5O7 and NaRbHC6H5O7. A prominent feature of the structure is the chain along [100] of very short, and very strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 2); the refined O11⋯O11 and O14⋯O14 distances are 2.398 and 2.159 Å, and the optimized distances are 2.398 and 2.347 Å. The Mulliken overlap populations in these hydrogen bonds are 0.143 and 0.133 electrons, which correspond to hydrogen-bond energies about 20.3 kcal mol−1. H18 forms an intra­molecular hydrogen bond to O13, one of the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen atoms.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Crystal structure of NaCsHC6H5O7, viewed down the b axis.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry for [NaCs(C6H6O7)].

D—H⋯A D—H(Å) H⋯A(Å) DA(Å) D—H⋯A(°) Mulliken overlap(electrons) H-bond energy(kcal mol−1)
O14—H22⋯O14i 1.200 1.200 2.347 156.1 0.133 19.9
O11—H21⋯O11ii 1.203 1.203 2.398 170.6 0.143 20.7
O17—H18⋯O13111 0.976 1.941 2.779 142.4 0.046 11.7

Symmetry codes: (i) −Inline graphic − x, −Inline graphic + y, Inline graphic − z; (ii) −x, y, −z; (iii) Inline graphic + x, −Inline graphic − y, −Inline graphic + z.

Database survey  

Details of the comprehensive literature search for citrate structures are presented in Rammohan & Kaduk (2018). After manually locating the peaks in the pattern of NaRbHC6H5O7, the pattern was indexed using Jade9.8 (MDI, 2017). A reduced-cell search in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD Version 5.39, update of November 2018; Groom et al., 2016) yielded 39 hits, among which was NaKHC6H5O7 (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2016).

After manually locating the peaks in the pattern of NaCsHC6H5O7, the pattern was indexed on a C-centered monoclinic cell using Jade9.8 (MDI, 2017). A reduced-cell search in the CSD yielded no hits. The cell was converted to I-centered, to yield a β angle closer to 90°.

Synthesis and crystallization  

Stoichiometric qu­anti­ties of Na2CO3 and Rb2CO3 were added to a solution of 10.0 mmol citric acid monohydrate in 10 mL water. After the fizzing subsided, the clear solution was dried in an oven at 403 K to yield the white solid NaRbHC6H5O7.

2.0236 g (10.0 mmol) of H3C6H5O7(H2O) were dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water. 0.5318 g of Na2CO3 (1.0 mmol Na, Sigma–Aldrich) and 1.6911 g of Cs2CO3 (10.0 mmol of Ca, Sigma–Aldrich) were added to the citric acid solution slowly with stirring. The resulting clear colorless solution was evaporated to dryness in a 403 K oven to yield NaCsHC6H5O7.

Refinement  

The initial structural model for NaRbHC6H5O7 was taken from Rammohan & Kaduk (2016), replacing the K by Rb and changing the lattice parameters to the observed values. Pseudovoigt profile coefficients were as parameterized in Thompson et al. (1987) and the asymmetry correction of Finger et al. (1994) was applied as well as the microstrain broadening description by Stephens (1999). The hydrogen atoms were included in fixed positions, which were re-calculated during the course of the refinement. Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement (Fig. 7) details are summarized in Table 3. The U iso of C2, C3, and C4 were constrained to be equal, and those of H7, H8, H9, and H10 were constrained to be 1.3 × that of these carbon atoms. The U iso of C1, C5, C6, and the oxygen atoms were constrained to be equal, and that of H18 was constrained to be 1.3 × this value. The U iso of H21 and H22 were fixed.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Rietveld plot for NaRbHC6H5O7. The red crosses represent the observed data points, and the green line is the calculated pattern. The magenta curve is the difference pattern, plotted at the same scale as the other patterns. The vertical scale has been multiplied by a factor of 10 for 2θ > 46.0°. The row of black tick marks indicates the reflection positions for this phase.

Table 3. Experimental details.

  [NaRb(C6H6O7)] [NaCs(C6H6O7)]
Crystal data
M r 298.57 346.00
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, P Inline graphic Monoclinic, I2
Temperature (K) 300 300
a, b, c (Å) 5.9864 (2), 8.4104 (3), 10.2903 (3) 10.8913 (5), 5.5168 (2), 17.7908 (8)
α, β, γ (°) 74.798 (3), 76.756 (3), 72.878 (2) 90, 97.014 (4), 90
V3) 471.28 (3) 1060.96 (6)
Z 2 4
Radiation type Kα1, Kα2, λ = 1.540593, 1.544451 Å Kα1, Kα2, λ = 0.709319, 0.713609 Å
μ (mm−1) 2.09
Specimen shape, size (mm) Flat sheet, 24 × 24 Cylinder, 12 × 0.3
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D2 Phaser PANalytical Empyrean
Specimen mounting Standard holder Glass capillary
Data collection mode Reflection Transmission
Scan method Step Step
2θ values (°) min = 5.001 2θmax = 100.007 2θstep = 0.020 min = 1.011 2θmax = 49.991 2θstep = 0.017
 
Refinement
R factors and goodness of fit R p = 0.028, R wp = 0.038, R exp = 0.022, R(F 2) = 0.13613, χ2 = 3.028 R p = 0.045, R wp = 0.059, R exp = 0.026, R(F 2) = 0.08622, χ2 = 5.570
No. of parameters 84 80
No. of restraints 29 29
H-atom treatment Only H-atom displacement parameters refined Only H-atom displacement parameters refined

The same symmetry and lattice parameters were used for the DFT calculations as for each powder diffraction study. Computer programs: DIFFRAC.Measurement (Bruker, 2009), FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002), GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2015) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Analysis of the systematic absences in the pattern of NaCsHC6H5O7 suggested the space groups I2, Im, or I2/m. The volume of the unit cell corresponded to Z = 4. Space group I2 was selected, and confirmed by successful solution and refinement of the structure. The structure was solved with FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002). The maximum sin θ/λ used for structure solution was 0.55 Å, and a citrate, Cs, Na, and O (water mol­ecule) were used as fragments. The solution with the lowest cost factor has the Cs, Na, and O on top of each other, but the Cs was eight-coordinate and all six carboxyl­ate oxygen atoms were coordinated to the Cs atom. The structure was examined for voids using Materials Studio (Dassault Systemes, 2017). One void at approximately 0.375,0.600,0.379 had acceptable coordination to O atoms, and was assigned as Na20. Another void was assigned as O21, but this moved too close to the citrate anion on refinement and was discarded. Active hydrogen atoms were placed by analysis of hydrogen-bonding inter­actions. The refinement strategy (Fig. 8) was similar to that used for the Rb compound. Cs19 was refined anisotropically.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Rietveld plot for NaCsHC6H5O7. The red crosses represent the observed data points, and the green line is the calculated pattern. The magenta curve is the difference pattern, plotted at the same scale as the other patterns. The vertical scale has been multiplied by a factor of 10 for 2θ > 28.8°. The row of black tick marks indicates the reflection positions for this phase.

Density functional geometry optimizations (fixed experimental unit cells) were carried out using CRYSTAL14 (Dovesi et al., 2014). The basis sets for the H, C, and O atoms were those of Gatti et al. (1994), the basis sets for Na was that of Dovesi et al. (1991), and the basis sets for Rb and Cs were those of Sophia et al. (2014). The calculations were run on eight 2.1 GHz Xeon cores (each with 6 GB RAM) of a 304-core Dell Linux cluster at Illinois Institute of Technology, using 8 k-points and the B3LYP functional, and took 10.8 and 7.5 h.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) KADU1716_publ, kadu1716_DFT, ACIG017_publ, acig017_DFT. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900063X/vn2138sup1.cif

e-75-00223-sup1.cif (573KB, cif)

CCDC references: 1890745, 1890746, 1890747, 1890748

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrey Rogachev for the use of computing resources at the Illinois Institute of Technology.

supplementary crystallographic information

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)rubidiumsodium] (KADU1716_publ). Crystal data

[NaRb(C6H6O7)] V = 471.28 (3) Å3
Mr = 298.57 Z = 2
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 2.104 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1 1, Kα2 radiation, λ = 1.540593, 1.544451 Å
a = 5.9864 (2) Å T = 300 K
b = 8.4104 (3) Å Particle morphology: powder
c = 10.2903 (3) Å white
α = 74.798 (3)° flat_sheet, 24 × 24 mm
β = 76.756 (3)° Specimen preparation: Prepared at 403 K
γ = 72.878 (2)°

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)rubidiumsodium] (KADU1716_publ). Data collection

Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer Data collection mode: reflection
Radiation source: selaed X-ray tube Scan method: step
Specimen mounting: standard holder min = 5.001°, 2θmax = 100.007°, 2θstep = 0.020°

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)rubidiumsodium] (KADU1716_publ). Refinement

Least-squares matrix: full 84 parameters
Rp = 0.028 29 restraints
Rwp = 0.038 2 constraints
Rexp = 0.022 Only H-atom displacement parameters refined
R(F2) = 0.13613 Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s
4701 data points (Δ/σ)max = 0.03
Profile function: CW Profile function number 4 with 27 terms Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in P. Thompson, D.E. Cox & J.B. Hastings (1987). J. Appl. Cryst.,20,79-83. Asymmetry correction of L.W. Finger, D.E. Cox & A. P. Jephcoat (1994). J. Appl. Cryst.,27,892-900. Microstrain broadening by P.W. Stephens, (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.,32,281-289. #1(GU) = 2.580 #2(GV) = 0.000 #3(GW) = 1.999 #4(GP) = 0.000 #5(LX) = 4.181 #6(ptec) = 1.74 #7(trns) = 4.34 #8(shft) = -2.5167 #9(sfec) = 0.00 #10(S/L) = 0.0235 #11(H/L) = 0.0200 #12(eta) = 0.0000 Peak tails are ignored where the intensity is below 0.0050 times the peak Aniso. broadening axis 0.0 0.0 1.0 Background function: GSAS Background function number 1 with 10 terms. Shifted Chebyshev function of 1st kind 1: 1751.95 2: -322.287 3: 62.9433 4: -1.65870 5: 15.3537 6: -30.8122 7: 27.0452 8: -10.7829 9: 5.15006 10: -0.147912

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)rubidiumsodium] (KADU1716_publ). Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.592 (2) 0.5051 (13) 0.6742 (10) 0.021 (2)*
C2 0.556 (2) 0.5974 (17) 0.7878 (10) 0.003 (6)*
C3 0.7655 (17) 0.6762 (10) 0.7701 (7) 0.003 (6)*
C4 0.744 (2) 0.7373 (16) 0.9020 (8) 0.003 (6)*
C5 0.905 (3) 0.851 (3) 0.8880 (9) 0.021 (2)*
C6 0.7512 (17) 0.8313 (11) 0.6487 (8) 0.021 (2)*
H7 0.54367 0.50387 0.89029 0.004 (7)*
H8 0.38434 0.70246 0.78480 0.004 (7)*
H9 0.79156 0.62260 0.98785 0.004 (7)*
H10 0.55240 0.80973 0.93127 0.004 (7)*
O11 0.507 (2) 0.5851 (14) 0.5670 (8) 0.021 (2)*
O12 0.657 (3) 0.3441 (14) 0.6967 (12) 0.021 (2)*
O13 0.898 (3) 0.9131 (19) 0.9900 (15) 0.021 (2)*
O14 1.045 (2) 0.8875 (18) 0.7771 (10) 0.021 (2)*
O15 0.914 (3) 0.8275 (16) 0.5451 (11) 0.021 (2)*
O16 0.5597 (18) 0.9458 (15) 0.6434 (12) 0.021 (2)*
O17 0.983 (2) 0.5533 (13) 0.7469 (11) 0.021 (2)*
H18 1.06896 0.61913 0.65793 0.027 (3)*
Na19 0.2740 (17) 0.8715 (12) 0.5586 (9) 0.038 (5)*
Rb20 0.1828 (6) 0.2215 (5) 0.7148 (3) 0.060 (2)*
H21 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.03*
H22 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03*

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)rubidiumsodium] (KADU1716_publ). Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C2 1.5091 (17) O14—Rb20iv 3.028 (14)
C1—O11 1.261 (3) O15—C6 1.269 (3)
C1—O12 1.267 (3) O15—Na19ii 2.332 (16)
C2—C1 1.5091 (17) O15—Na19v 2.504 (13)
C2—C3 1.5403 (17) O15—Rb20i 3.013 (16)
C3—C2 1.5403 (17) O16—C3 2.429 (6)
C3—C4 1.5392 (17) O16—C6 1.263 (3)
C3—C6 1.5486 (17) O16—O15 2.193 (8)
C3—O17 1.419 (3) O16—O16v 3.04 (2)
C4—C3 1.5392 (17) O16—Na19 2.382 (17)
C4—C5 1.5111 (17) O16—Na19v 2.439 (13)
C5—C4 1.5111 (17) O16—Rb20vi 2.839 (11)
C5—O13 1.275 (3) O17—C3 1.419 (3)
C5—O14 1.274 (3) O17—Rb20ii 2.769 (10)
C6—C3 1.5486 (17) Na19—O11 2.393 (16)
C6—O15 1.269 (3) Na19—O12i 3.453 (14)
C6—O16 1.263 (3) Na19—O14vii 2.366 (13)
O11—C1 1.261 (3) Na19—O15vii 2.332 (16)
O11—Na19 2.393 (16) Na19—O15v 2.504 (13)
O11—Rb20i 3.366 (12) Na19—O16 2.382 (17)
O12—C1 1.267 (3) Na19—O16v 2.439 (13)
O12—C2 2.411 (8) Rb20—O11i 3.366 (12)
O12—Rb20 3.246 (14) Rb20—O12vii 3.044 (13)
O12—Rb20ii 3.044 (13) Rb20—O12 3.246 (14)
O13—C5 1.275 (3) Rb20—O13iii 2.931 (16)
O13—Rb20iii 2.931 (16) Rb20—O14viii 3.028 (14)
O13—H22 1.117 (10) Rb20—O15i 3.013 (16)
O14—C4 2.433 (14) Rb20—O16ix 2.839 (11)
O14—C5 1.274 (3) Rb20—O17vii 2.769 (10)
O14—Na19ii 2.366 (13)
C2—C1—O11 118.7 (8) O11—Na19—O15v 158.0 (5)
C2—C1—O12 120.3 (6) O11—Na19—O16 92.2 (5)
O11—C1—O12 119.1 (7) O11—Na19—O16v 108.6 (6)
C1—C2—C3 109.8 (5) O14vii—Na19—O15vii 75.6 (5)
C2—C3—C4 107.2 (4) O14vii—Na19—O15v 93.6 (5)
C2—C3—C6 110.0 (4) O14vii—Na19—O16 84.7 (5)
C2—C3—O17 110.1 (5) O14vii—Na19—O16v 140.0 (6)
C4—C3—C6 108.9 (5) O15vii—Na19—O15v 82.9 (6)
C4—C3—O17 110.8 (5) O15vii—Na19—O16 159.9 (7)
C6—C3—O17 109.9 (4) O15vii—Na19—O16v 114.6 (6)
C3—C4—C5 113.0 (7) O15v—Na19—O16 94.3 (7)
C4—C5—O13 118.6 (6) O15v—Na19—O16v 52.7 (2)
C4—C5—O14 121.5 (11) O16—Na19—O16v 78.1 (5)
O13—C5—O14 119.9 (8) O11i—Rb20—O12vii 109.5 (3)
C3—C6—O15 119.6 (5) O11i—Rb20—O12 53.0 (3)
C3—C6—O16 119.2 (5) O11i—Rb20—O13iii 151.0 (3)
O15—C6—O16 120.1 (6) O11i—Rb20—O14viii 130.8 (3)
C1—O11—Na19 118.5 (9) O11i—Rb20—O15i 67.2 (3)
C1—O11—Rb20i 123.9 (10) O11i—Rb20—O16ix 77.9 (3)
Na19—O11—Rb20i 81.1 (4) O11i—Rb20—O17vii 82.2 (3)
C1—O12—Rb20 105.2 (8) O12vii—Rb20—O12 144.3 (4)
C1—O12—Rb20ii 110.5 (10) O12vii—Rb20—O13iii 93.8 (4)
Rb20—O12—Rb20ii 144.3 (4) O12vii—Rb20—O14viii 78.6 (3)
C5—O13—Rb20iii 132.3 (10) O12vii—Rb20—O15i 68.6 (3)
C5—O14—Na19ii 160.1 (13) O12vii—Rb20—O16ix 135.6 (4)
C5—O14—Rb20iv 118.0 (12) O12vii—Rb20—O17vii 66.2 (4)
Na19ii—O14—Rb20iv 81.6 (5) O12—Rb20—O13iii 98.0 (3)
C6—O15—Na19ii 118.8 (12) O12—Rb20—O14viii 137.1 (3)
C6—O15—Na19v 90.6 (6) O12—Rb20—O15i 117.4 (3)
C6—O15—Rb20i 119.3 (11) O12—Rb20—O16ix 76.0 (3)
Na19ii—O15—Na19v 97.1 (6) O12—Rb20—O17vii 79.7 (3)
Na19ii—O15—Rb20i 121.9 (4) O13iii—Rb20—O14viii 69.3 (3)
Na19v—O15—Rb20i 79.8 (4) O13iii—Rb20—O15i 140.0 (3)
C6—O16—Na19 112.9 (12) O13iii—Rb20—O16ix 97.6 (4)
C6—O16—Na19v 93.8 (6) O13iii—Rb20—O17vii 92.2 (4)
C6—O16—Rb20vi 158.9 (12) O14viii—Rb20—O15i 72.0 (3)
Na19—O16—Na19v 101.9 (5) O14viii—Rb20—O16ix 66.0 (4)
Na19—O16—Rb20vi 85.5 (4) O14viii—Rb20—O17vii 139.1 (4)
Na19v—O16—Rb20vi 92.3 (4) O15i—Rb20—O16ix 75.4 (4)
O11—Na19—O14vii 107.9 (5) O15i—Rb20—O17vii 110.9 (4)
O11—Na19—O15vii 97.9 (6) O16ix—Rb20—O17vii 154.8 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (iv) x+1, y+1, z; (v) −x+1, −y+2, −z+1; (vi) x, y+1, z; (vii) x−1, y, z; (viii) x−1, y−1, z; (ix) x, y−1, z.

(kadu1716_DFT). Crystal data

C6H6NaO7Rb α = 74.7995°
Mr = 298.57 β = 76.7573°
Triclinic, P1 γ = 72.8749°
a = 5.9859 Å V = 471.23 Å3
b = 8.4102 Å Z = 2
c = 10.2904 Å

(kadu1716_DFT). Data collection

h = → l = →
k = →

(kadu1716_DFT). Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.58312 0.48855 0.68564 0.01800*
C2 0.57651 0.57925 0.79638 0.00600*
C3 0.76841 0.67872 0.76846 0.00600*
C4 0.73694 0.75315 0.89436 0.00600*
C5 0.90081 0.86416 0.88638 0.01800*
C6 0.74570 0.82427 0.63974 0.01800*
H7 0.60167 0.48235 0.88975 0.00700*
H8 0.40172 0.66683 0.81269 0.00700*
H9 0.76305 0.64923 0.98397 0.00700*
H10 0.55518 0.83019 0.91496 0.00700*
O11 0.50420 0.58854 0.57498 0.01800*
O12 0.65090 0.33239 0.70086 0.01800*
O13 0.87388 0.91272 0.99960 0.01800*
O14 1.04257 0.90330 0.78197 0.01800*
O15 0.91969 0.81409 0.54210 0.01800*
O16 0.56046 0.94323 0.63928 0.01800*
O17 0.99694 0.56509 0.74766 0.01800*
H18 1.06896 0.61913 0.65793 0.02340*
Na19 0.25929 0.87959 0.56024 0.02900*
Rb20 0.19358 0.22247 0.71319 0.05030*
H21 0.50000 0.50000 0.50000 0.03000*
H22 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 0.03000*

(kadu1716_DFT). Bond lengths (Å)

C1—C2 1.516 C4—H10 1.095
C1—O11 1.318 C5—O13 1.294
C1—O12 1.233 C5—O14 1.243
C2—C3 1.546 C6—O15 1.271
C2—H7 1.092 C6—O16 1.256
C2—H8 1.094 O11—H21 1.213
C3—C4 1.533 O13—H22 1.199
C3—C6 1.551 O17—H18 0.979
C3—O17 1.426 H21—O11i 1.213
C4—C5 1.517 H22—O13ii 1.199
C4—H9 1.096

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+2, −y+2, −z+2.

(kadu1716_DFT). Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O13—H22···O13 1.199 1.199 2.398 180.0
O11—H21···O11 1.213 1.213 2.426 180.0
O17—H18···O15 0.979 1.873 2.575 126.2
O17—H18···O11 0.979 2.507 3.180 125.8
C2—H8···O14 1.094 2.478 3.541 163.7

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)caesiumsodium] (ACIG017_publ). Crystal data

[CsNa(C6H6O7)] Z = 4
Mr = 346.00 Dx = 2.166 Mg m3
Monoclinic, I2 1, Kα2 radiation, λ = 0.709319, 0.713609 Å
Hall symbol: I 2y µ = 2.09 mm1
a = 10.8913 (5) Å T = 300 K
b = 5.5168 (2) Å Particle morphology: powder
c = 17.7908 (8) Å white
β = 97.014 (4)° cylinder, 12 × 0.3 mm
V = 1060.96 (6) Å3 Specimen preparation: Prepared at 403 K

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)caesiumsodium] (ACIG017_publ). Data collection

PANalytical Empyrean diffractometer Data collection mode: transmission
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube Scan method: step
Specimen mounting: glass capillary min = 1.011°, 2θmax = 49.991°, 2θstep = 0.017°

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)caesiumsodium] (ACIG017_publ). Refinement

Least-squares matrix: full 80 parameters
Rp = 0.045 29 restraints
Rwp = 0.059 2 constraints
Rexp = 0.026 Only H-atom displacement parameters refined
R(F2) = 0.08622 Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s
2932 data points (Δ/σ)max = 0.06
Profile function: CW Profile function number 4 with 21 terms Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in P. Thompson, D.E. Cox & J.B. Hastings (1987). J. Appl. Cryst.,20,79-83. Asymmetry correction of L.W. Finger, D.E. Cox & A. P. Jephcoat (1994). J. Appl. Cryst.,27,892-900. Microstrain broadening by P.W. Stephens, (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.,32,281-289. #1(GU) = 53.860 #2(GV) = 0.000 #3(GW) = 0.786 #4(GP) = 0.000 #5(LX) = 1.886 #6(ptec) = 0.00 #7(trns) = 0.00 #8(shft) = 0.0000 #9(sfec) = 0.00 #10(S/L) = 0.0151 #11(H/L) = 0.0173 #12(eta) = 0.5113 #13(S400 ) = 1.1E-01 #14(S040 ) = 4.6E-01 #15(S004 ) = 6.1E-03 #16(S220 ) = 2.3E-01 #17(S202 ) = 3.5E-02 #18(S022 ) = 7.8E-02 #19(S301 ) = 8.2E-02 #20(S103 ) = -1.3E-02 #21(S121 ) = 7.3E-02 Peak tails are ignored where the intensity is below 0.0050 times the peak Aniso. broadening axis 0.0 0.0 1.0 Background function: GSAS Background function number 1 with 3 terms. Shifted Chebyshev function of 1st kind 1: 711.736 2: 51.3623 3: -153.142

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)caesiumsodium] (ACIG017_publ). Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.5180 (19) 0.183 (7) 0.3879 (6) 0.027 (3)*
C2 0.5919 (14) 0.118 (3) 0.3242 (6) 0.002 (7)*
C3 0.5465 (10) 0.234 (2) 0.2470 (5) 0.002 (7)*
C4 0.6279 (14) 0.138 (3) 0.1886 (6) 0.002 (7)*
C5 0.588 (2) 0.249 (3) 0.1120 (6) 0.027 (3)*
C6 0.4103 (11) 0.162 (3) 0.2216 (9) 0.027 (3)*
H7 0.58724 −0.0875 0.31719 0.003 (9)*
H8 0.69162 0.17452 0.33886 0.003 (9)*
H9 0.61841 −0.06615 0.18447 0.003 (9)*
H10 0.72772 0.19018 0.20703 0.003 (9)*
O11 0.5625 (17) 0.129 (4) 0.4554 (6) 0.027 (3)*
O12 0.4121 (17) 0.285 (4) 0.3756 (9) 0.027 (3)*
O13 0.601 (3) 0.476 (3) 0.1023 (8) 0.027 (3)*
O14 0.5515 (19) 0.112 (3) 0.0558 (7) 0.027 (3)*
O15 0.3392 (15) 0.319 (3) 0.1871 (10) 0.027 (3)*
O16 0.3821 (15) −0.062 (3) 0.2172 (12) 0.027 (3)*
O17 0.5558 (14) 0.490 (2) 0.2509 (8) 0.027 (3)*
H18 0.54799 0.56496 0.20157 0.036 (4)*
Cs19 0.3269 (3) 0.70766 0.05362 (15) 0.04276
Na20 0.3483 (18) 0.742 (6) 0.2891 (9) 0.124 (8)*
H21 0.5 0.102 0.5 0.05*
H22 0.5 0.124 0.0 0.05*

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)caesiumsodium] (ACIG017_publ). Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cs19 0.039 (3) 0.038 (3) 0.051 (3) 0.006 (5) 0.006 (2) −0.007 (5)

Poly[(µ-hydrogen citrato)caesiumsodium] (ACIG017_publ). Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C2 1.512 (2) O14—Cs19iv 3.341 (19)
C1—O11 1.274 (7) O15—C6 1.272 (7)
C1—O12 1.278 (7) O15—Cs19 3.189 (17)
C2—C1 1.512 (2) O15—Na20 2.95 (3)
C2—C3 1.540 (2) O15—Na20i 2.18 (2)
C3—C2 1.540 (2) O16—C6 1.272 (7)
C3—C4 1.540 (2) O16—Cs19iii 3.17 (2)
C3—C6 1.548 (2) O16—Na20iii 1.75 (3)
C3—O17 1.419 (7) O16—Na20i 3.01 (3)
C4—C3 1.540 (2) O17—C3 1.419 (7)
C4—C5 1.509 (2) O17—Na20 2.81 (3)
C5—C4 1.509 (2) Cs19—O11v 3.211 (17)
C5—O13 1.272 (7) Cs19—O12vi 3.057 (15)
C5—O14 1.275 (7) Cs19—O13 3.27 (3)
C6—C3 1.548 (2) Cs19—O13ii 3.236 (17)
C6—O15 1.272 (7) Cs19—O14vii 3.309 (17)
C6—O16 1.272 (7) Cs19—O14viii 3.341 (19)
O11—C1 1.274 (7) Cs19—O15 3.189 (17)
O12—C1 1.278 (7) Cs19—O16vii 3.17 (2)
O12—Cs19i 3.057 (15) Cs19—H18 3.435 (3)
O12—Na20 2.99 (4) Na20—O12 2.99 (4)
O13—C5 1.272 (7) Na20—O15 2.95 (3)
O13—Cs19 3.27 (3) Na20—O15vi 2.18 (2)
O13—Cs19ii 3.236 (17) Na20—O16vii 1.75 (3)
O14—C5 1.275 (7) Na20—O16vi 3.01 (3)
O14—O14ii 2.16 (3) Na20—O17 2.81 (3)
O14—Cs19iii 3.309 (17)
C2—C1—O11 118.3 (5) C3—O17—H18 112.6 (12)
C2—C1—O12 121.9 (7) O11v—Cs19—O12vi 59.4 (3)
O11—C1—O12 119.8 (6) O11v—Cs19—O13 145.2 (5)
C1—C2—C3 115.3 (5) O11v—Cs19—O13ii 76.9 (5)
C2—C3—C4 108.1 (6) O11v—Cs19—O14vii 135.3 (5)
C2—C3—C6 110.2 (6) O11v—Cs19—O14viii 99.6 (4)
C2—C3—O17 110.9 (6) O11v—Cs19—O15 105.5 (4)
C4—C3—C6 108.9 (6) O11v—Cs19—O16vii 127.7 (5)
C4—C3—O17 109.3 (6) O12vi—Cs19—O13 137.9 (6)
C6—C3—O17 109.4 (6) O12vi—Cs19—O13ii 135.7 (6)
C3—C4—C5 110.0 (6) O12vi—Cs19—O14vii 124.5 (5)
C4—C5—O13 119.6 (8) O12vi—Cs19—O14viii 124.4 (5)
C4—C5—O14 119.7 (6) O12vi—Cs19—O15 75.3 (5)
O13—C5—O14 120.4 (7) O12vi—Cs19—O16vii 68.9 (5)
C3—C6—O15 118.0 (6) O13—Cs19—O13ii 76.3 (5)
C3—C6—O16 118.9 (7) O13—Cs19—O14vii 67.1 (4)
O15—C6—O16 120.4 (6) O13—Cs19—O14viii 90.1 (5)
C1—O11—Cs19ix 134 (2) O13—Cs19—O15 65.5 (4)
C1—O12—Cs19i 131.6 (15) O13—Cs19—O16vii 81.3 (4)
C5—O13—Cs19 107.5 (19) O13ii—Cs19—O14vii 91.2 (5)
C5—O13—Cs19ii 123.3 (10) O13ii—Cs19—O14viii 67.1 (3)
Cs19—O13—Cs19ii 85.8 (4) O13ii—Cs19—O15 112.4 (5)
C5—O14—Cs19iii 124.4 (14) O13ii—Cs19—O16vii 155.3 (6)
C5—O14—Cs19iv 138.3 (18) O14vii—Cs19—O14viii 37.9 (4)
Cs19iii—O14—Cs19iv 83.5 (4) O14vii—Cs19—O15 118.7 (4)
C6—O15—Cs19 141.8 (14) O14vii—Cs19—O16vii 70.2 (4)
C6—O15—Na20i 107.7 (14) O14viii—Cs19—O15 154.1 (4)
Cs19—O15—Na20i 108.7 (8) O14viii—Cs19—O16vii 102.9 (4)
C6—O16—Cs19iii 117.6 (13) O15—Cs19—O16vii 66.3 (3)
C6—O16—Na20iii 129 (2) O15vi—Na20—O16vii 107.9 (15)
Cs19iii—O16—Na20iii 113.1 (11)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, y, −z; (iii) x, y−1, z; (iv) −x+1, y−1, −z; (v) x−1/2, y+1/2, z−1/2; (vi) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (vii) x, y+1, z; (viii) −x+1, y+1, −z; (ix) x+1/2, y−1/2, z+1/2.

(acig017_DFT). Crystal data

C6H6CsNaO7 c = 17.7909 Å
Mr = 346.0 β = 97.0160°
Monoclinic, I2 V = 1060.98 Å3
a = 10.8918 Å Z = 4
b = 5.5166 Å

(acig017_DFT). Data collection

DFT calculation k = →
h = → l = →

(acig017_DFT). Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.01539 −0.29133 −0.11491 0.02190*
C2 0.08720 −0.37073 −0.17866 0.00770*
C3 0.04485 −0.25744 −0.25560 0.00770*
C4 −0.36770 0.15585 0.18731 0.00770*
C5 −0.40727 0.26100 0.10948 0.02190*
C6 −0.09031 −0.33701 −0.28568 0.02190*
H7 0.07745 0.43212 −0.18341 0.01000*
H8 0.18550 −0.33438 −0.16183 0.01000*
H9 −0.36925 −0.04136 0.18368 0.01000*
H10 −0.27329 0.21290 0.20759 0.01000*
O11 0.06648 −0.36068 −0.04898 0.02190*
O12 −0.08435 −0.17967 −0.12642 0.02190*
O13 −0.41832 0.48425 0.09987 0.02190*
O14 −0.43234 0.10103 0.05664 0.02190*
O15 0.33500 0.32450 0.18636 0.02190*
O16 0.38339 −0.05889 0.21767 0.02190*
O17 0.05257 −0.00031 −0.24718 0.02190*
H18 0.04799 0.06496 −0.29843 0.02800*
Cs19 0.31925 −0.29064 0.05016 0.04080*
Na20 −0.15569 0.10811 −0.21537 0.10800*
H21 0.00000 −0.34288 0.00000 0.05000*
H22 0.00000 −0.35387 0.50000 0.05000*

(acig017_DFT). Bond lengths (Å)

C1—C2 1.519 O15—Na20xii 2.339
C1—O11 1.293 O16—C6xii 1.260
C1—O12 1.244 O16—Cs19 3.240
C2—C3 1.524 O16—Na20xiii 2.258
C2—H7i 1.095 O16—Na20vii 2.641
C2—H8 1.095 O17—H18 0.976
C3—C4ii 1.551 O17—Na20 2.477
C3—C6 1.566 Cs19—Cs19vi 5.517
C3—O17 1.428 Cs19—Cs19i 5.517
C4—C3iii 1.551 Cs19—O15i 3.210
C4—C5 1.515 Cs19—O12vii 3.100
C4—H9 1.090 Cs19—O13xiv 3.143
C4—H10 1.094 Cs19—O14xv 3.453
C5—O13 1.247 Cs19—O14vii 3.220
C5—O14 1.294 Cs19—O13xvi 3.246
C6—O15iv 1.267 Cs19—Cs19xvii 4.517
C6—O16iv 1.260 Cs19—Na20xiii 4.184
C6—Na20v 2.785 Cs19—Na20vii 4.234
H7—C2vi 1.095 Na20—O15vii 2.398
O11—Cs19 3.107 Na20—C6xviii 2.785
O11—H21 1.203 Na20—Na20xviii 3.568
O12—Cs19vii 3.100 Na20—Na20v 3.568
O12—Na20 2.308 Na20—O16xi 2.258
O13—Cs19viii 3.143 Na20—O15iv 2.339
O13—Cs19ix 3.246 Na20—O16vii 2.641
O14—Cs19x 3.453 Na20—Cs19xi 4.184
O14—Cs19vii 3.220 Na20—Cs19vii 4.234
O14—H22xi 1.200 H21—O11vii 1.203
O15—C6xii 1.267 H22—O14xix 1.200
O15—Cs19vi 3.210 H22—O14xiii 1.200
O15—Na20vii 2.398

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) x+1/2, y−1/2, z−1/2; (iii) x−1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x−1/2, y−1/2, z−1/2; (v) −x−1/2, y−1/2, −z−1/2; (vi) x, y+1, z; (vii) −x, y, −z; (viii) x−1, y+1, z; (ix) −x, y+1, −z; (x) x−1, y, z; (xi) x−1/2, y+1/2, z−1/2; (xii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (xiii) x+1/2, y−1/2, z+1/2; (xiv) x+1, y−1, z; (xv) x+1, y, z; (xvi) −x, y−1, −z; (xvii) −x+1, y, −z; (xviii) −x−1/2, y+1/2, −z−1/2; (xix) −x−1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2.

(acig017_DFT). Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O14—H22···O14 1.200 1.200 2.347 156.1
O11—H21···O11 1.203 1.203 2.398 170.6
O17—H18···O13 0.976 1.941 2.779 142.4

References

  1. Bravais, A. (1866). Etudes Cristallographiques. Paris: Gauthier Villars.
  2. Bruker (2009). DIFFRAC.Measurement. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Cigler, A. J. & Kaduk, J. A. (2018). Acta Cryst. C74, 1160–1170. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Crystal Impact (2015). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  5. Dassault Systemes (2017). Materials Studio. BIOVIA, San Diego California, USA.
  6. Donnay, J. D. H. & Harker, D. (1937). Am. Mineral. 22, 446–467.
  7. Dovesi, R., Orlando, R., Erba, A., Zicovich-Wilson, C. M., Civalleri, B., Casassa, S., Maschio, L., Ferrabone, M., De La Pierre, M., D’Arco, P., Noël, Y., Causà, M., Rérat, M. & Kirtman, B. (2014). Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1287–1317.
  8. Dovesi, R., Roetti, C., Freyria-Fava, C., Prencipe, M. & Saunders, V. R. (1991). Chem. Phys. 156, 11–19.
  9. Favre-Nicolin, V. & Černý, R. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 734–743.
  10. Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E. & Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 892–900.
  11. Friedel, G. (1907). Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. 30, 326–455.
  12. Gatti, C., Saunders, V. R. & Roetti, C. (1994). J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10686–10696.
  13. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Larson, A. C. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2004). General Structure Analysis System, (GSAS). Report LAUR. 86–784 Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA.
  15. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  16. MDI (2017). Jade9.8. Materials Data Inc., Livermore CA.
  17. Rammohan, A. & Kaduk, J. A. (2016). Acta Cryst. E72, 170–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Rammohan, A. & Kaduk, J. A. (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 239–252. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Sophia, G., Baranek, P., Sarrazin, C., Rerat, M. & Dovesi, R. (2014). Unpublished; http://www.crystal.unito.it/index.php.
  20. Stephens, P. W. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 281–289.
  21. Streek, J. van de & Neumann, M. A. (2014). Acta Cryst. B70, 1020–1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Thompson, P., Cox, D. E. & Hastings, J. B. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 79–83.
  23. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) KADU1716_publ, kadu1716_DFT, ACIG017_publ, acig017_DFT. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900063X/vn2138sup1.cif

e-75-00223-sup1.cif (573KB, cif)

CCDC references: 1890745, 1890746, 1890747, 1890748

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES