Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2018 Nov 21;70(3):1005–1016. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery415

Overexpression of thioredoxin m in tobacco chloroplasts inhibits the protein kinase STN7 and alters photosynthetic performance

María Ancín 1, Alicia Fernández-San Millán 1, Luis Larraya 1, Fermín Morales 1,2, Jon Veramendi 1, Iker Aranjuelo 1, Inmaculada Farran 1,
PMCID: PMC6363096  PMID: 30476130

Plants overexpressing chloroplast Trx m, but not f, inhibited STN7 activity in a redox-dependent way, which contributes to elucidation of the specificity of chloroplast Trxs for STN7 down-regulation.

Keywords: LHCII phosphorylation, Nicotiana tabacum, photosynthesis, protein complex, thioredoxin, thylakoid membrane

Abstract

The activity of the protein kinase STN7, involved in phosphorylation of the light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins, has been reported as being co-operatively regulated by the redox state of the plastoquinone pool and the ferredoxin–thioredoxin (Trx) system. The present study aims to investigate the role of plastid Trxs in STN7 regulation and their impact on photosynthesis. For this purpose, tobacco plants overexpressing Trx f or m from the plastid genome were characterized, demonstrating that only Trx m overexpression was associated with a complete loss of LHCII phosphorylation that did not correlate with decreased STN7 levels. The absence of phosphorylation in Trx m-overexpressing plants impeded migration of LHCII from PSII to PSI, with the concomitant loss of PSI–LHCII complex formation. Consequently, the thylakoid ultrastructure was altered, showing reduced grana stacking. Moreover, the electron transport rate was negatively affected, showing an impact on energy-demanding processes such as the Rubisco maximum carboxylation capacity and ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration rate values, which caused a strong depletion in net photosynthetic rates. Finally, tobacco plants overexpressing a Trx m mutant lacking the reactive redox site showed equivalent physiological performance to the wild type, indicating that the overexpressed Trx m deactivates STN7 in a redox-dependent way.

Introduction

The gathering of light energy and its later transformation into chemical energy is a central process for the proper functioning of photosynthetic machinery and plant performance. In photosynthetic organisms, light energy is captured by a set of light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) that constitute, together with their associated reaction centers and electron donors/acceptors, the PSI and PSII photosystems. Both photosystems are connected in series by a cytochrome b6f (Cytb6f) complex. This connection allows the transport of electrons generated from the splitting of water in PSII towards the final electron acceptor of PSI, ferredoxin (Fd), all of which comprise the photosynthetic electron transport chain (ETC). Likewise, Fd provides electrons to key enzymes of the Calvin–Benson cycle for CO2 fixation via the Fd–thioredoxin (Trx) system, which carefully co-ordinates the light and carbon reactions of photosynthesis (Schürmann and Buchanan, 2008). As part of this system, chloroplast Trxs catalyze the reduction of disulfide bonds in target proteins, modulating their structure and function, and providing flexibility to plants for photosynthetic acclimation to changing environmental conditions (Nikkanen and Rintamäki, 2014; Geigenberger et al., 2017). Recent reports highlight that while the two main chloroplast Trxs (m and f) are involved in Calvin–Benson cycle reduction in vivo (Okegawa and Motohashi, 2015; Naranjo et al., 2016), Trx m seems to be more specifically engaged in the control of processes balancing photosynthetic reactions (Courteille et al., 2013; Rey et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Thormählen et al., 2017; Da et al., 2018).

Photosynthetic performance is highly regulated by environmental factors such as temperature, nutrients, and, in particular, light. Changes in light quality cause unequal distribution of excitation energy between the two photosystems. It is known that preferential excitation of PSII promotes the activation of a redox-sensitive kinase that allows the phosphorylation of LHCII. The phosphorylated LHCII (pLHCII) migrates from PSII towards PSI and shifts the excitation energy in favor of PSI (the so-called state 2). Conversely, under light conditions favoring PSI excitation, the kinase is deactivated and the pLHCII becomes dephosphorylated and relocated to PSII, thus increasing its cross-section and balancing the energy towards PSII (reversion to state 1). This rebalancing process, called state transitions, has been described as a fast post-translational acclimation mechanism operating in photosynthetic organisms under limiting light intensities (Allen, 1992, 2003; Lemeille and Rochaix, 2010; Tikkanen et al., 2011). In vascular plants, LHCII comprises different homo- and heterotrimers of Lhcb1, Lhcb2, and Lhcb3 apoproteins (Galka et al., 2012). According to their affinity for binding to the PSII core, LHCII trimers can be classified into at least three different types: S (strong), M (moderate), and L (loose) (Dekker and Boekema, 2005). Both S and M trimers play a minor role in state transitions, whereas the peripherally associated L trimer comprises the mobile fraction of the LHCII pool (Galka et al., 2012; Wientjes et al., 2013a; Crepin and Caffarri, 2015). Recent studies in Arabidopsis have demonstrated that S and M trimers still remain associated with PSII upon phosphorylation (Wientjes et al., 2013a; Crepin and Caffarri, 2015), and that phosphorylated L trimers may also serve as an antenna for PSI in most natural light conditions (Wientjes et al., 2013b), suggesting that association of pLHCII with PSI in higher plants may also represent a long-term response against changes in light intensity under most natural light conditions.

LHCII phosphorylation is triggered by the redox state of the plastoquinone (PQ) pool through the activation of a thylakoid-associated LHCII kinase (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005). Two orthologous LHCII kinases called Stt7 and STN7 have been identified in Chlamydomonas and Arabidopsis, respectively (Depège et al., 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005). These are transmembrane proteins with catalytic domains exposed to the stroma that contain two conserved Cys residues, essential for their activity, located at the N-terminus on the lumenal side (Lemeille et al., 2009; Wunder et al., 2013a). The LHCII kinase requires an intact Cytb6f complex to be active (Bennett et al., 1988; Gal et al., 1988, 1990) and is mainly regulated by the redox state of the PQ pool, with an interaction between plastoquinol and the quinol oxidation site of the Cytb6f complex being critical for its activation (Vener et al., 1997; Zito et al., 1999). The interaction of Stt7/STN7 with the Cytb6f complex occurs by means of the Rieske protein (PetC) (Lemeille et al., 2009). Previous studies have shown that maximal Stt7/STN7 activity in vivo occurs at low light (LL) intensities, whereas it is drastically inhibited at higher irradiances (Schuster et al., 1986; Rintamäki et al., 1997). This inhibition has been reported to be mediated by the redox state of the chloroplast, most probably via the Fd–Trx system (Rintamäki et al., 2000). The two well-conserved lumenal Cys residues have been reported to be the obvious target for stromal Trxs (Depège et al., 2003), although they are located on opposite sides of the thylakoid membrane. If this were the case, a transthylakoid redox pathway would be required to make the kinase inactive (Dietzel et al., 2008; Lemeille and Rochaix, 2010). Recent findings, however, have demonstrated that the disulfide bridge formed by the two conserved lumenal Cys residues is maintained during both activation and deactivation of the kinase (Shapiguzov et al., 2016), indicating that mechanisms other than thiol reduction of these Cys residues should be involved in the regulation of the STN7 deactivation under high light (HL) conditions. Other authors have proposed the two conserved Cys residues located in the stroma as alternative substrates for Trxs (Rintamäki et al., 2000; Puthiyaveetil, 2011). Rintamäki et al. (2000) postulated that the Trx target site of STN7 is hidden in the active kinase, whereas in HL it becomes exposed and thus is made available for Trx inhibition. However, these stromal Cys residues are conserved in land plants but not in unicellular green algae (Puthiyaveetil, 2011; Shapiguzov et al., 2016) and, moreover, seem to not be required for STN7 activity and state transitions (Shapiguzov et al., 2016). Therefore, the mechanistic basis for explaining the STN7 shut off through the Fd–Trx system is still the subject of debate.

The specificity of chloroplast Trxs in controlling the inactivation of STN7 under HL likewise remains largely unsolved. The first report on this, conducted with an in vitro phosphorylation assay of thylakoid membranes, involved both Trx f and m in the inhibition of LHCII phosphorylation, with Trx f being more efficient at low concentrations (Rintamäki et al., 2000). Later, a direct physical interaction between STN7 and Trx f was demonstrated in vitro (Wunder et al., 2013b). Recently, a plausible STN7 activation has been proposed in Arabidopsis trxm1m2 mutants as a compensatory mechanism that allows increased photosynthesis during the LL periods of fluctuating light (Thormählen et al., 2017). Here we have analyzed the specificity of chloroplast Trxs f or m in the redox regulation of STN7 and its impact on photosynthesis. This analysis was performed in wild-type (Wt) tobacco plants, as well as in lines overexpressing Trx f or m (o/exTrxf and o/exTrxm, respectively) from the plastid genome. Our findings demonstrate that overexpression of Trx m, but not Trx f, was associated with a complete loss of LHCII phosphorylation under LL conditions. In addition, the photosynthetic machinery was severely impaired in o/exTrxm plants. A putative role for Trx m in altering LHCII phosphorylation, and its consequences on modifying thylakoid architecture and photosynthetic performance in tobacco plants are discussed.

Materials and methods

Plant material and experimental conditions

Wt tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Petite Havana SR1) and plants overexpressing the mature Trxf or Trxm sequence from the chloroplast genome under the control of the PrrnG10L regulatory sequence (Sanz-Barrio et al., 2013) were used in this study. Transformed and Wt plants were grown in a phytotron under the following conditions: 16 h light photoperiod, 80 µmol m–2 s–1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), and 28 ºC. Samples were taken from young fully expanded leaves of 7-week-old plants after 16 h light or 8 h dark, if not indicated otherwise. When necessary, plants were adapted to different light regimes: dark (D); LL at 80 µmol m–2 –1; HL at 800 µmol m–2 s–1 generated by a high-pressure sodium lamp (SON-T Agro 400; Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands); or far-red light (FR; which preferentially excites PSI) obtained by covering the sodium lamp with a Rosco-27 filter (Rosco Labs, Port Chester, NY, USA).

Chl a fluorescence: fast transient and steady-state measurements

Fast transient Chl a fluorescence was measured using the portable FluorPen FP 100 (Photon Systems Instruments, Drasov, Czech Republic) in dark-adapted leaves (8 h) to allow the complete oxidation of reaction centers. Chl a fluorescence transients were induced by the exposure of plants to high irradiance (3000 µmol m–2 s–1), and fluorescence was recorded for 2 s. The data are shown as the relative fluorescence at time t (Vt), defined as (FtFo)/(FmFo).

Steady-state Chl a fluorescence measurements were carried out with the fluorometer of a Li-Cor 6400XT gas exchange portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) at a PPFD of 1200 µmol m–2 s–1. The quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) was calculated as (Fm′–Fs)/(Fm′) (Genty et al., 1989). Photochemical energy quenching (qP or qL) was calculated using either qP=(Fm′–Fs)/(Fm′– Fo′) or qL=(Fm′–Fs)/(Fm′–Fo′)×Fo′/Fs (Kramer et al., 2004). The fraction of closed (reduced) PSII reaction centers, also known as the excitation pressure (EP), was calculated as either 1–qP or 1–qL.

Determination of gas exchange and photosynthetic electron transport rate

Fully expanded apical leaves were used to measure gas exchange with a Li-Cor 6400XT. The gas exchange response to [CO2] was measured by changing the [CO2] entering the leaf chamber with the following steps: 400, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 50, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1000, 1200, and 1500 μmol mol–1, with 2–3 min between each step. The net rate of CO2 assimilation (AN), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), and substomatal CO2 concentration (Ci) were estimated at a PPFD of 1200 µmol m–2 s–1 and 400 µmol mol–1 [CO2] using equations developed by von Caemmerer and Farquhar (1981). Estimations of the maximum carboxylation velocity of Rubisco (Vcmax), the maximum electron transport rate contributing to ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) regeneration (Jmax), and the triose phosphate utilization rate (TPU) were determined according to Sharkey et al. (2007).

Simultaneous measurements of Chl a fluorescence and CO2 exchange under non-photorespiratory conditions (2% O2 in volume) were performed with the Li-Cor 6400XT by varying the light intensity in a stepwise manner (from 2000 µmol m–2 s–1 to 0 µmol m–2 s–1). This procedure allows estimation of the rate of photosynthetic electron transport (ETR) according to Genty et al. (1989) as follows: ETR=4[(ΦPSIIb)/a]PPFD, with a, b, and PPFD being, respectively, the slope, the ordinate axis intercept of the relationship between ΦPSII and ΦCO2, and the incident PPFD (Cornic and Briantais, 1991).

Finally, we calculated the distribution of energy between the two photosystems (f) from ETR=ΦPSII×PPFD×leaf absorptance×f (Kral and Edwards, 1992), assuming a maximum leaf absorptance of 0.875, based on the constancy of light absorption for the leaf Chl concentrations found in our experiments (Morales et al., 1991).

Chlorophyll content

Photosynthetic pigments were extracted from leaf disks collected from fully expanded leaves and crushed in 5 ml of 80% acetone. After centrifugation, the amount of Chl a and b was measured spectrophotometrically and calculated according to Lichtenthaler (1987).

Detection of thylakoid phosphoproteins and the amount of STN7

Leaf samples (100 mg) were ground in liquid nitrogen, and thylakoid membranes were isolated according to Rintamäki et al. (1996). All of the extraction buffers contained 10 mM NaF (phosphatase inhibitor) to maintain the in vivo phosphorylation state. Protein concentration was measured using the RC protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Thylakoid extracts (15 µg of protein) were electrophoresed in a 15% polyacrylamide gel containing 6 M urea, and separated proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane for immunoblotting. Phosphoproteins were immunodetected using a rabbit polyclonal phosphothreonine antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), at a dilution of 1:1000, and a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) at a 1:10 000 dilution. Detection was performed using the ECL Prime western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To determine the amount of STN7 in these samples, blots were immunoprobed with a specific STN7 antibody (Agrisera AB, Vännäs, Sweden) at a dilution of 1:2000. Protein bands were detected using the ECL Select western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare).

Structure and protein composition of thylakoid membranes

Thylakoid membranes, isolated as described before, were solubilized with 1.5% digitonin, a milder detergent that preserves weak interactions between protein complexes and provides information on protein complexes in the stroma lamellae as well as in grana margins and end membranes (Järvi et al., 2011). Thylakoid proteins (80 µg) were analyzed by blue-native PAGE (BN-PAGE) using 4–16% NativePAGE Novex Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, which enables the resolution of protein complexes of high molecular weight (up to ≥1000 kDa). Thylakoid proteins were then transferred to a PVDF membrane, immunoprobed against Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 antibodies (1:1000 dilution; Agrisera AB), and detected by ECL Prime.

For TEM analysis, leaf samples from Wt and o/exTrxm plants were fixed and processed as previously described (Sanz-Barrio et al., 2011).

Pull-down of His-tagged proteins

Chloroplasts from tobacco plants were isolated (Fernández-San Millán et al., 2018) and protein–protein interactions were stabilized in situ using the cell-permeable DSP [dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate)] cross-linker (ThermoFisher Scientific). Cross-linked chloroplasts were lysed [50 mM BisTris, 6 N HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 10% (w/v) glycerol, 1% digitonin, and protease inhibitor cocktail], and His-tagged Trx target complexes were pulled down using Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as follows: chloroplast lysates were incubated with 200 µl of Ni-NTA resin for 3–4 h at 4 °C. After centrifugation at 600 g for 1 min, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed five times with washing buffer (lysis buffer without digitonin). The pulled-down proteins were eluted with 4× Laemmli buffer (0.5 M Tris–HCl pH 6.5, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 10% β-mercaptoethanol). Input extracts and pulled-down proteins were analyzed by SDS–PAGE and immunoblotted with specific antibodies: anti-STN7 (Agrisera AB), anti-Trx m and anti-Trx f (Sanz-Barrio et al., 2011), anti-2-Cys peroxiredoxin (Prx) (Pérez-Ruiz et al., 2006), or anti-Lhcb1.

Results

Overexpression of Trx m, but not f, impedes LHCII phosphorylation by down-regulating STN7 activity

The phosphorylation status of isolated thylakoids from Wt, o/exTrxf, and o/exTrxm plants grown under LL conditions (80 µmol m–2 s–1) was monitored by western blot (Fig. 1A). LHCII phosphorylation, which is predominantly mediated by STN7, was detected in Wt and o/exTrxf plants, whereas it was completely lacking in o/exTrxm plants. In contrast, levels of phosphorylated PSII core proteins (regulated by the protein kinase STN8; Vainonen et al., 2005) barely differed among o/exTrxf, o/exTrxm, and Wt plants. These results indicate that the overexpression of Trx m in tobacco plants specifically inhibits the phosphorylation status of STN7-specific substrates. Curiously, STN7 was found at even higher levels in o/exTrxm plants than in Wt and o/exTrxf plants (Fig. 1B), which indicates that the lack of phosphorylation in o/exTrxm plants did not correlate with a decrease in the amount of STN7, but instead may be indicative of a down-regulation of its kinase activity.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Effect of Trx m or f overexpression in tobacco chloroplasts on thylakoid protein phosphorylation and STN7 accumulation. (A) Thylakoid protein phosphorylation in Wt, o/exTrxm, and o/exTrxf plants sampled during the light (16 h at 80 μmol m−2 s−1) period. Thylakoid proteins (15 µg) were separated by SDS–PAGE (15%+6 M urea), transferred to a PVDF membrane, and immunoblotted with a phosphothreonine antibody. Phosphorylated LHCII (pLHCII) proteins are indicated. The asterisk represents phosphorylated PSII core proteins (D1 or D2). Molecular weights (kDa) are indicated on the left. (B) STN7 protein accumulation in the samples described in (A). The PVDF membrane was probed with an antibody raised against STN7. (C) LHCII phosphorylation pattern under different light regimes. Wt, o/exTrxm, and o/exTrxf plants were placed in darkness (D) for 8 h and then transferred for 2 h to low light (LL; 80 μmol m−2 s−1), followed by exposure to high light (HL; 800 μmol m−2 s−1) or far red light (FR) for 1 h. At the end of light treatments, the LHCII phosphorylation of isolated thylakoids was analyzed by western blot.

To compare the LHCII phosphorylation pattern under different light regimes, Wt, o/exTrxf, and o/exTrxm plants were left in darkness for 8 h, and then placed for 2 h in LL, which normally induces state 2. Plants were then exposed to 1 h of either HL or FR conditions to induce state 1. As expected, LHCII phosphorylation in Wt plants was inhibited in darkness and became activated under LL conditions, whereas treatments with HL or FR again triggered complete dephosphorylation of LHCII (Fig. 1C). Interestingly, o/exTrxm plants seemed to be arrested in state 1, with LHCII constitutively dephosphorylated. In contrast, o/exTrxf plants retained the LHCII phosphorylation under dark and HL conditions as if they were trapped in state 2 (Fig. 1C). Subsequently, only a prolonged FR exposure (1 h) allowed the transition from state 2 to 1.

The redox status of the PQ pool is altered in Trx-overexpressing tobacco plants

It is well known that STN7 activation is controlled by reductions in the PQ pool. The fast transient of Chl a fluorescence (OJIP; Strasserf et al., 1995) has been used to estimate the redox state of the intermediate electron carriers in the transgenic lines. As shown in Fig. 2A, the shape of the OJIP transient rise was altered in dark-adapted leaves of o/exTrxf and o/exTrxm plants, which exhibited an increase in the J value of ~15% and 60% compared with Wt plants, respectively. Hence, in both transgenic lines, the area above the J–I curve was smaller than in the Wt (Fig. 2A). This area is assumed to be a measure of the number of oxidized PQ molecules available at the beginning of the fluorescence measurement (Tóth et al., 2005), suggesting that the fraction of reduced PQ in the dark is increased in both transgenic plants relative to the Wt. To corroborate this fact, Wt, o/exTrxf, and o/exTrxm leaves were subjected to FR as a way of removing the electron accumulation in the PSII acceptor side (Belkhodja et al., 1998). Leaves were therefore subjected to a 1 min FR pulse followed by 30 s of dark adaptation to avoid any possible actinic effect induced by the FR pulse. After this treatment, the OJIP transient of dark-adapted Trx-overexpressing leaves almost recovered the Wt shape (Fig. 2B), which confirms the over-reduction of the PQ pool in both transgenic lines. To investigate the redox state of the PQ pool in light, the fluorescence parameters 1–qL and 1–qP were used. As shown in Fig. 2C and D, both parameters were significantly increased in o/exTrxm plants, which indicates that a more reduced PQ pool also occurs at saturating light conditions and suggests that the PQ pool would be permanently over-reduced in this genotype. Therefore, the decreased STN7 activity in o/exTrxm plants under LL does not appear to correlate with an oxidation of the PQ pool.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effect of Trx overexpression on Chl a fluorescence transients in o/exTrxm, o/exTrxf, and Wt tobacco leaves. O, J, I, and P points represent increasing Chl fluorescence values during exposure to a short saturating light pulse. (A) Normalized Chl a fluorescence transients of overnight dark-adapted leaves. (B) Normalized Chl a fluorescence transients of overnight dark-adapted leaves subjected to a 1 min far-red (FR) pulse followed by 30 s of dark adaptation. (C) Redox status of the PQ pool expressed as 1–qL. (D) Redox status of the PQ pool expressed as 1–qP. Data shown are the mean ±SE (n=6 plants for each line). Statistical significance compared with Wt plants is indicated by asterisks (P<0.05, Student’s t-test).

Overexpression of Trx m alters the structure and protein composition of thylakoid membranes

To assess the effect of inhibited LHCII phosphorylation on formation of the PSI–LHCII supercomplex during state transitions, BN-PAGE analyses were performed on digitonin-solubilized thylakoid membranes from LL- and dark-adapted Wt, o/exTrxm, and o/exTrxf plants (Fig. 3). The state transition-specific PSI–LHCII supercomplex appeared in Wt thylakoids that were exposed to LL (state 2), whereas it was markedly reduced in Wt thylakoids kept in darkness (state 1) (Fig. 3A). The BN-PAGE analysis revealed no significant differences between Wt and o/exTrxf under LL conditions, while the PSI–LHCII supercomplex failed to form in o/exTrxm thylakoids (Fig. 3A). This indicates that the absence of phosphorylation in the o/exTrxm line (Fig. 1C) impedes migration of LHCII from PSII to PSI, with the concomitant loss of PSI–LHCII supercomplex formation. Conversely, a large portion of the PSI–LHCII supercomplex persisted in thylakoid membranes from dark-adapted o/exTrxf leaves (Fig. 3A), which is consistent with the high LHCII phosphorylation level shown by this line in darkness (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Thylakoid protein complex organization and composition. (A) Thylakoid protein complexes (80 µg) from Wt, o/exTrxm, and o/exTrxf plants were solubilized with 1.5% digitonin and separated by BN-PAGE. Identification of protein complexes was performed in accordance with Järvi et al. (2011) and Wunder et al. (2013b). (B) Lhcb1 protein content in thylakoid complexes. Thylakoid complexes reported above were transferred to a PVDF membrane and immunoblotted against Lhcb1 antibody.

The mobile LHCII trimers performing state transitions are mainly composed of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 proteins (Galka et al., 2012). We therefore analyzed the level of these two apoproteins in thylakoid extracts. BN-PAGE combined with immunoblotting showed that in the Wt, Lhcb1 and 2 mainly migrated as LHCII trimers but also as PSI–LHCII complexes and larger megacomplexes under LL, whereas the abundance of these complexes decreased in the dark (Fig. 3B; Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online). The larger digitonin-solubilized megacomplexes mainly represented PSI–LHCII megacomplexes and PSI–PSII complexes migrating together (Järvi et al., 2011). Trx f-overexpressing plants exposed to LL displayed a similar Lhcb1 and 2 distribution to the Wt, while the number of state transition-specific complexes considerably increased in thylakoids of o/exTrxf plants kept in the dark. In contrast, Lhcb1 and 2 proteins were not detected at the gel position corresponding to the PSI–LHCII complex or at the location of the larger megacomplexes in o/exTrxm plants grown under LL (Fig. 3B; Supplementary Fig. S1). Taken together, our results support the idea that phosphorylation of LHCII proteins strongly influences the formation of such megacomplexes.

The overexpression of Trx m in tobacco plants altered not only the phosphorylation pattern of Lhcb 1 and 2 apoproteins, but also their abundance in chloroplasts. An Lhcb1/2 reduction of ~50% was observed in o/exTrxm compared with Wt and o/exTrxf plants (Supplementary Fig. S2). To examine whether changes in the LHCII abundance could influence thylakoid ultrastructure, chloroplasts of Wt and o/exTrxm plants were analyzed by TEM. As shown in Fig. 4, thylakoids from Wt plants formed a continuous network of stromal lamellae with stacked grana (left panel), whereas thylakoids from o/exTrxm plants were partially unstacked, with stacks exhibiting fewer membrane layers (reduction in grana height) than in the Wt (right panel).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Thylakoid ultrastructure of o/exTrxm plants. TEM was performed to examine leaf mesophyll cells from tobacco Wt and Trx m-overexpressing plants. Representative cross-sections of chloroplasts are shown. v, vacuole; ct, cytoplasm; cw, cell wall; g, grana; s, starch.

Overexpression of Trx m negatively affects photosynthesis

Gas exchange analyses conducted in leaves of Wt, o/exTrxm, and o/exTrxf plants showed no differences between the Wt and o/exTrxf (Table 1). On the other hand, while no significant differences were detected in stomatal opening (gs) and leaf transpiration (E) between the three genotypes, the net photosynthesis (AN) strongly decreased in o/exTrxm plants. The higher substomatal CO2 concentration (Ci) of o/exTrxm may be linked with their lower CO2 fixation rates. A–Ci curve analyses revealed that depleted photosynthetic rates detected in o/exTrm were associated with the lower values detected for the maximum carboxylation velocity of Rubisco, the maximum electron transport rate contributing to RuBP regeneration, and the triose phosphate utilization rate (Vcmax, Jmax, and TPU, respectively).

Table 1.

Net photosynthesis (AN, µmol CO2 m–2 s-1), substomatal CO2 concentration (Ci, µmol CO2 mol–1 air), stomatal conductance (gs, mol H2O m–2 s–1), transpiration (E, mmol H2O m–2 s–1), maximum carboxylation velocity of Rubisco (Vcmax, µmol m–2 s–1), maximum electron transport rate contributing to RuBP regeneration (Jmax, µmol m–2 s–1), and triose phosphate utilization rates (TPU, µmol m–2 s–1) in 7-week-old wild-type, and Trx m- and f-overexpressing plants (Wt, o/exTrxm, and o/exTrxf, respectively)

A N Ci g s E Vcmax J max TPU
Wt 11.69 ± 0.47 a 292.02 ± 5.67 b 0.208 ± 0.021 a 2.83 ± 0.45 a 56.56 ± 3.86 a 66.64 ± 1.85 a 3.69 ± 0.14 a
o/exTrxm 6.99 ± 0.34 b 326.87 ± 7.55 a 0.210 ± 0.023 a 3.27 ± 0.33 a 32.28 ± 1.22 b 38.42 ± 1.38 b 2.09 ± 0.13 b
o/exTrxf 10.99 ± 0.36 a 294.59 ± 9.07 b 0.204 ± 0.017 a 2.93 ± 0.35 a 49.47 ± 2.79 a 61.97 ± 1.65 a 3.25 ± 0.12 a

Values are means ±SE (n=6–9). Different letters denote significantly different values (ANOVA, P <0.05).

Effects of Trx m overexpression on photochemistry were further confirmed by simultaneous measurements of the light response curves of photosynthesis and fluorescence at low O2, which allows quantification of photosynthetic ETR in the absence of photorespiration. The data revealed a lower photosynthetic ETR in o/exTrxm than in the Wt plants (Table 2), in line with the above-mentioned decreased Jmax values. In addition, this approach allows estimation of the light distribution between PSII and PSI. These results indicated a lower distribution of light to PSII in o/exTrxm than in the Wt plants (Table 2), suggesting changes in the stoichiometry of PSII with respect to PSI in o/exTrxm plants. The Chl a and b concentrations were also reduced in o/exTrxm compared with Wt and o/exTrxf plants (Table 2). Moreover, significant differences in the Chl a/b ratio were found between lines, the ratio being higher in o/exTrxm plants as a consequence of a more prominent decrease in Chl b than in the Chl a concentration (Table 2). This result can be explained by decreases in antenna size and/or alterations in the stoichiometry of thylakoid pigment–protein complexes of the photosystems. The latter would be in agreement with the described alteration of light distribution between photosystems.

Table 2.

Chl a and b concentration (µg cm–2), Chl a/b ratio, photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR, µmol e m–2 s–1), and energy distribution between PSII and PSI (f) in 7-week-old wild-type, and Trx m- and f-overexpressing plants (Wt, o/exTrxm, and o/exTrxf, respectively)

Chl a Chl b Chl a/b ETR f
Wt 27.77 ± 1.38 a 8.73 ± 0.30 a 3.18 ± 0.08 b 62.50 ± 1.45 a 0.54 ± 0.00 a
o/exTrxm 13.67 ± 0.48 b 3.80 ± 0.08 b 3.60 ± 0.12 a 30.67 ± 2.05 b 0.46 ± 0.00 b
o/exTrxf 26.97 ± 1.37 a 8.51 ± 0.67 a 3.17 ± 0.12 b ND ND

Values are means ±SE (n=6–9). Different letters denote significantly different values (ANOVA, P <0.05).

ND, not determined.

Tobacco plants overexpressing the Trx m redox mutant variant recovered the Wt phenotype

To ascertain whether the STN7 inactivation observed in o/exTrxm plants was triggered by the reductase activity of the overexpressed Trx m, the two Cys residues within its catalytic domain were replaced by serine (C37/40S) to generate the redox mutant. Transplastomic tobacco plants overexpressing this mutant (o/exTrxm-mut) were generated by chloroplast transformation as previously described (Sanz-Barrio et al., 2013), and integration of the transgene into plastid DNA and homoplasmy was confirmed (Supplementary Fig. S3A, B). O/exTrxm-mut plants almost recovered the Wt phenotype, with the expression level of the mutated variant being similar to that of Trx m in o/exTrxm plants (Supplementary Fig. S3C, D). Regarding the LHCII phosphorylation status, pLHCII was detected in LL-adapted o/exTrxm-mut plants at similar levels to those in the Wt (Fig. 5A), which indicates that STN7 conserves its phosphorylation capacity in this line. Accordingly, BN-PAGE analyses of thylakoid protein complexes clearly revealed that o/exTrxm-mut plants also recovered the state transition-specific PSI–LHCII complex under LL conditions (Fig. 5B). When the fast Chl a fluorescence transient was analyzed in leaves of o/exTrxm-mut plants, the OJIP shape shifted towards that of the Wt plants (Fig. 5C). In agreement with these findings, the AN and ETR in o/exTrxm-mut plants reached values similar to those of Wt plants (Fig. 5D). Taken together, our results provide evidence for the recovery of the Wt phenotype when the Trx m redox mutant was overexpressed in tobacco chloroplasts, suggesting that, in o/exTrxm plants, the overexpressed Trx m inhibits STN7 activity and impairs the photosynthetic performance of tobacco plants in a redox-dependent way.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Recovery phenotype in tobacco plants overexpressing the redox mutant variant of Trx m. (A) LHCII protein phosphorylation in Wt, o/exTrxm, and o/exTrxm-mut plants sampled under low light (LL, 80 μmol m−2 s−1) or dark (D) conditions. Thylakoid proteins (15 µg of protein) were separated by SDS–PAGE (15%+6 M urea), transferred to a PVDF membrane, and immunoblotted with a phosphothreonine-specific antibody. The asterisk represents phosphorylated PSII core proteins (D1 or D2). (B) Pigment–protein complexes from thylakoids (80 µg) were separated by BN-PAGE. The identity of protein complexes is shown. (C) Normalized OJIP transients of overnight dark-adapted leaves. (D) Net rate of CO2 assimilation (AN) and the photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR).

Putative protein–protein interaction between Trx m and STN7/PetC proteins

To investigate a putative protein–protein interaction between Trx m and STN7 or proteins involved in the kinase activation such as PetC, an in vivo pull-down assay using chloroplasts from His-tagged Trx m-overexpressing tobacco plants was performed. Chloroplasts from Wt, o/exTrxf, and o/exTrxm-mut were used as controls. The pull-down assay allowed recovery of substantial amounts of overexpressed Trxs, which correlated with the amount present in the respective input extracts (Supplementary Fig. S4). Input extracts and pulled-down proteins were analyzed by SDS–PAGE and then immunoblotted with anti-STN7 and anti-PetC (Fig. 6). The results indicated that STN7 and PetC were barely detected in the pulled-down fraction from Wt, o/exTrxf, and o/exTrxm-mut plant extracts, whereas they were enriched in the fraction from o/exTrxm extracts (Fig. 6). The input and pulled-down fractions from each line were also immunoblotted with anti-2-Cys Prx, a well-known Trx target protein (König et al., 2002), and anti-Lhcb1 (a non-target protein) as positive and negative controls, respectively. While no presence of Lhcb1 was found in any pulled-down fraction, 2-Cys Prx co-precipitated with both the Trx m and f proteins (Fig. 6). Altogether, these results demonstrate a putative protein–protein interaction, either directly or through associated partners, between Trx m and the STN7/PetC proteins.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

In vivo pull-down assay showing interaction between Trx m and STN7/PetC. Protein complexes from Wt and His-tagged o/exTrxm, o/exTrxf, and o/exTrxm-mut cross-linked chloroplasts were pulled-down with Ni-NTA resin. After washing the beads, bound proteins were eluted by boiling and analyzed, together with input fractions, by western blot using anti-STN7, anti-PetC, anti-2-Cys Prx, and anti-Lhcb1 antibodies.

Discussion

Phosphorylation pattern of LHCII proteins in Trx-overexpressing tobacco plants

Our study highlighted that, under typical inhibitory light conditions (such as HL and darkness; Rintamäki et al., 1997), the overexpression of Trx f in tobacco chloroplasts is associated with an induction of LHCII phosphorylation (Fig. 1). In fact, pLHCII levels in the o/exTrxf line were comparable with (under HL) or even higher (in the dark) than those induced by LL. Similar results were reported in transgenic Arabidopsis lines overexpressing STN7 (Wunder et al., 2013a). However, in our case, differences in the LHCII phosphorylation pattern between o/exTrxf and Wt plants could not be explained by an increase in the STN7 amount since it was even lower than in the Wt (Fig. 1B). Indeed, according to Hou et al. (2002), regulation of LHCII phosphorylation might be due not only to light conditions but also to the metabolic status of the chloroplast. In particular, increased LHCII phosphorylation in darkness has been observed in Arabidopsis by feeding leaves with glucose (Tikkanen et al., 2010). Previous studies have shown that Trx f overexpression in tobacco chloroplasts increases the soluble sugar content in leaves, and particularly that of glucose (Sanz-Barrio et al., 2013). Therefore, we presume that the STN7 activation observed in o/exTrxf tobacco plants could be due to the metabolic status of the chloroplast. More specifically, the sugar accumulation would favor production of NADPH from the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, leading to a non-photochemical reduction of the PQ pool (Fig. 2A, B) via NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (Corneille et al., 1998) and the subsequent STN7 activation. In agreement with this, an increase in the NADPH/NADP ratio was recorded in this transgenic line (Supplementary Fig. S5). The over-reduced PQ pool in o/exTrxf plants is only apparent in OJIP measurement but not in 1–qL and 1–qP (Fig. 2C, D), probably because the pressure of electron flow at the saturating light conditions employed for these measurements may overcome the PQ pool over-reduction in this genotype.

In o/exTrxm plants, however, STN7 seems to be insensitive to the reduction state of the PQ pool (Figs 1, 2), and the pattern of LHCII phosphorylation resembles that of stn7 mutants (Wunder et al., 2013a). Nevertheless, the lack of LHCII phosphorylation in o/exTrxm leaves could not be explained by a down-regulation of the amount of STN7, but rather STN7 tends to accumulate at even higher levels than in the Wt (Fig. 1B). It is known that STN7 abundance is regulated at both the transcriptional and post-translational level in a light- and redox-dependent manner (Wunder et al., 2013a). Accordingly, the STN7 accumulation in o/exTrxm plants clearly correlated with a more reduced PQ pool (Figs 1, 2). The PQ pool over-reduction in o/exTrxm plants may be linked to a decrease in the PSI activity, mainly caused by the lack of state 2 transition (i.e. smaller PSI antenna size) and decreased Fd amount at the PSI acceptor side (Supplementary Fig. S6). An over-reduction of transthylakoid redox carriers such as CcdA and HCF164, caused by Trx m overexpression (discussed below), could likewise cause an unbalanced PQ pool. The STN7 accumulation in o/exTrxm plants was, however, not accompanied by an increase in the STN7 kinase activity, as reported for several photosynthetic mutant lines with constitutively over-reduced PQ pools (Wunder et al., 2013a), but instead resulted in a complete STN7 deactivation (Fig. 1). The increase in STN7 levels in o/exTrxm plants could therefore be a compensatory response to the absence of state transitions. Similar results were reported in Arabidopsis mutants lacking Lhcb1, where STN7 also tends to accumulate in the absence of state transitions (Pietrzykowska et al., 2014).

In summary, we demonstrated in vivo that the overexpression of Trx m, but not its counterpart Trx f, down-regulates the STN7 activity, while earlier reports, based on in vitro experiments, showed the involvement of both f and m in the STN7 inhibition (Rintamäki et al., 2000; Wunder et al., 2013b). This discrepancy may be explained by the lack of specificity for different target enzymes that Trxs f and m usually revealed when in vitro studies were used (Geigenberger et al., 2017).

How Trx m overexpression induces STN7 inactivation

The current knowledge of Trx-mediated STN7 inactivation under HL supports two working hypotheses: (i) reduced Trx directly breaks the stromal disulfide bridge of STN7 thus interfering with ATP binding and leading to its inactivation (Rintamäki et al., 2000; Puthiyaveetil, 2011); and (ii) reduction of the lumenal bridge involves a transthylakoid redox pathway for the delivery of reducing equivalents from the stroma to the lumen, with the CcdA and HCF164 proteins (Lennartz et al., 2001; Page et al., 2004) being the most suitable candidates (Dietzel et al., 2008; Lemeille and Rochaix, 2010). Recent studies, however, speculate that the ROS generated in HL conditions might affect kinase folding in the thylakoid membrane, blocking its activity (Shapiguzov et al., 2016). However, comparable ROS contents were shown in all genotypes (Supplementary Fig. S7), so ROS accumulation cannot account for the deactivation of STN7 in o/exTrxm plants. Within this context, our results would provide support in vivo that Trx m serves as the stromal source of reducing power for thiol-dependent regulation of STN7 activity.

It is well known that Stt7/STN7 interacts with the Cytb6f complex by means of PetC (Lemeille et al., 2009), an interaction that critically affects the kinase activity (Vener et al., 1997; Zito et al., 1999). Reverse genetic approaches have also unveiled a relevant role for PetC in state transitions and LHCII phosphorylation (Wollman and Lemaire, 1988; Wunder et al., 2013a). However, our study showed that the amount of PetC protein in o/exTrxm plants was similar to (or even higher than) the quantity found in Wt plants (Supplementary Fig. S8), indicating that the STN7 deactivation in this line should not be attributed to PetC down-regulation. According to Shapiguzov et al. (2016), the movement of the lumenal PetC domain [which typically occurs during electron transfer within the Cytb6f complex (Breyton, 2000)] could be coupled to a transitory dimer formation of the kinase, leading to its activation. The direct interaction between STN7 and PetC raises the possibility that the same redox system operates during regulation of their redox states. In this sense, it is known that the CcdA/HCF164 transthylakoid redox pathway is required for Cytb6f assembly, with Trx m probably being the stromal electron donor for this system (Lennartz et al., 2001; Page et al., 2004; Motohashi and Hisabori, 2006, 2010). Therefore, Trx m overexpression could be causing the over-reduction of the STN7 lumenal Cys residues (by means of the CcdA/HCF164 pathway) with the consequent impact on transitory dimer formation, as has been shown after prolonged anaerobic treatment (Shapiguzov et al., 2016). However, the fact that the overexpressed Trx m specifically associates with STN7 inside the chloroplast (Fig. 6), along with previous results showing that the mutation of the lumenal STN7 cysteines does not affect its interaction with Trx (Wunder et al., 2013b), rather support the idea that Trx m causes changes in the redox state of Cys residues placed in the kinase domain, hampering its activity (Puthiyaveetil, 2011). Consistent with this, three m-type Trxs (m1, m2, and m4) have been identified in the peripheral fraction of the thylakoid membrane proteome from Arabidopsis chloroplasts, indicating that these isoforms are associated with the stromal side of the thylakoid membrane (Friso et al., 2004). Some of the discrepancies with this model reported in Shapiguzov et al. (2016) could be explained by a dynamically buried/exposed Trx target site in STN7 as originally proposed by Rintamäki et al. (2000). With regard to the pulled-down PetC found in o/exTrxm plants (Fig. 6), it would be more likely to result from isolation of cross-linked endogenous protein complexes in chloroplasts, most probably by means of the CcdA/HCF164 redox pathway, than from a direct interaction with Trx m.

Overexpression of Trx m shows altered protein complex composition and thylakoid architecture, as well as impaired photosynthetic performance in tobacco plants

The overexpression of Trx m in tobacco chloroplasts affected both the protein composition of photosynthetic complexes and the thylakoid structure, and consequently impacted photosynthesis (Figs 34; Table 1; Supplementary Figs S1–S2). The PSI–LHCII supercomplex (characteristic of state transitions) is formed when a subpopulation of pLHCII migrates from PSII to PSI so as to increase their optical absorption cross-section (Kouřil et al., 2005; Pesaresi et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011; Allen, 2017). In this study, BN-PAGE fractionation of digitonin-solubilized thylakoid proteins revealed a clear correlation between LHCII phosphorylation and the amount of PSI–LHCII supercomplex and the related larger megacomplexes (Figs 1, 3). Thus, state transition-specific complexes were absent in o/exTrxm plants grown under LL conditions, reaffirming that in the absence of phosphorylation no migration of LHCII from PSII to PSI occurs, whereas they were abundant in o/exTrxf plants kept in the dark, for which a strong kinase activity is presumed (discussed above). Curiously, a small amount of PSI–LHCII supercomplex was perceived in both Wt and o/exTrxm plants in the dark (Fig. 3), in agreement with the residual LHCII phosphorylation level (Fig. 1C). Low STN7 activity in the dark has previously been reported in Arabidopsis, and was attributed to a stromal electron source triggering PQ pool reduction (Wunder et al., 2013a). Therefore, our results indicate that the overexpressed Trx m must be reduced (using photosynthetic electrons provided by Fd during the day) to abolish LHCII phosphorylation efficiently, and this reinforces the importance of Trx m reductase activity in this process.

The overexpression of Trx m in tobacco chloroplasts likewise resulted in partial unstacking of grana (Fig. 4). Unstacking of thylakoid membranes may be induced by LHCII phosphorylation in the transition from state 1 to 2 (Chuartzman et al., 2008) or by PSII core phosphorylation under HL stress (Tikkanen et al., 2008; Herbstová et al., 2012). However, in o/exTrxm plants, partial unstacking occurs in the absence of LHCII phosphorylation (plants blocked in state 1) and with a phosphorylation pattern of PSII core proteins similar to that of the Wt (Fig. 1A). Therefore, other factors such as the amount of LHCII or curvature thylakoid 1 (CURT1) proteins (Pribil et al., 2014) may account for the observed phenotype. Along these lines, our results show a down-regulation of Lhcb1-2 in o/exTrxm plants (Supplementary Fig. S2), which could explain the observed rearrangement in the thylakoids. Accordingly, a similar thylakoid architecture phenotype has been reported from an Arabidopsis line deficient in Lhcb1 (Pietrzykowska et al., 2014). Likewise, the light distribution difference in favor of PSI seen in o/exTrxm plants could easily be explained by the smaller PSII antenna size (Lhcb1-2 reduction), which agrees with the higher Chl a/b ratio of these plants (Table 2).

The observed decrease in LHCII proteins in o/exTrxm plants suggests a marked LHCII degradation process in this genotype. According to previous studies (Lindahl et al., 1995; Yang et al., 1998), dephosphorylated LHCII seems to be the preferred substrate for protease enzymes. Thus, the lack of LHCII phosphorylation in o/exTrxm plants suggests that protease enzymes may have degraded these proteins. There are several lines of evidence that FtsH, a metalloprotease essential for the repair of photodamaged D1, is also responsible for degradation of several LHCII apoproteins (Zelisko et al., 2005; Luciński and Jackowski, 2013). Interestingly, redox control of the FtsH proteolytic activity has recently been demonstrated in Chlamydomonas (Wang et al., 2017), suggesting that the overexpressed Trx m in tobacco chloroplasts might induce a reactivation of FtsH protease. Similarly, the PQ pool over-reduction in o/exTrxm plants could also down-regulate the transcription of cab genes (Escoubas et al., 1995; Yang et al., 2001), which may also contribute to the decreased LHCII level.

Energy required to sustain functioning of the photosynthetic apparatus requires an adjusted and co-ordinated light energy capture, which then needs to be transported through the photosynthetic electron chain and used in carboxylation. The absence of significant differences in stomatal opening or increases in substomatal CO2 concentration revealed that the impaired photosynthetic rates in o/exTrxm plants could not have been due to the availability of CO2 at the Rubisco carboxylation site. Instead, the reduced photosynthesis was due to a lower energetic status that negatively affected the photosynthetic machinery and CO2 fixation. In fact, our data show that the depleted ETR of o/exTrxm plants was the main factor explaining the lower VCmax and Jmax, which are both energy-demanding processes. In o/exTrxm plants, not only is the linear photosynthetic ETR impaired, as described in this work, but the cyclic ETR has also been reported as being markedly affected (Courteille et al., 2013). In green algae, the absence of state transitions could also affect the photosynthetic cyclic electron flow (CEF; Finazzi et al., 2002). However, it seems that the failure to undergo state transitions does not affect the CEF in the stn7 mutant (Pesaresi et al., 2009), implying that state transitions and CEF act independently in land plants. Rather, the absence of CEF in o/exTrxm plants could be related to the reduced thylakoid stacking observed in this line, as has recently been proposed (Johnson, 2018; Wood et al., 2018). Overall, our results highlight the fact that the inhibited photosynthetic performance of o/exTrxm plants could be a consequence of depleted phosphorylated LHCII protein, which negatively affects the energetic status, photosynthetic machinery, and CO2 fixation in those plants. However, previous studies conducted with SNT7 mutants demonstrated that state transitions do not become critical for plant performance (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Frenkel et al., 2007), suggesting that factors other than STN7 deactivation should account for the observed o/exTrxm phenotype. In this sense, the overexpressed Trx m could be affecting the redox regulation of relevant chloroplast metabolic pathways such as C and N metabolism, thereby influencing the photosynthetic performance of this genotype.

Conclusions

The present work provides the first in vivo evidence for the Trx-mediated STN7 inactivation in plants and contributes to elucidate the m-type Trx that specifically inhibits this kinase. Moreover, our results suggest that the overexpressed Trx m in tobacco chloroplasts might induce a reactivation of FtsH, with the concomitant degradation of LHCII (mainly the dephosphorylated forms), which in turn leads to alterations in thylakoid protein stoichiometry and ultrastructure. Both STN7 deactivation and the altered thylakoid architecture could account for the impaired photosynthetic performance of this genotype. In summary, the chloroplast behavior of o/exTrxm plants resembles that of plants exposed to HL stress, where LHCII phosphorylation is switched off and thylakoid architectural adaptation occurs so as to facilitate the repair of photodamaged PSII (Herbstová et al., 2012). Altogether, our results may suggest a putative role for the Fd–Trx system, via Trx m, in governing the chloroplast response to HL intensities.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Fig. S1. Lhcb2 protein content in thylakoid complexes.

Fig. S2. Analysis of Lhcb1-2 abundance.

Fig. S3. Generation of o/exTrxm-mut transplastomic tobacco plants.

Fig. S4. Trx m and f were efficiently precipitated in the pull-down assay.

Fig. S5. Pyridine nucleotide NADPH/NADP ratio in leaves.

Fig. S6. Abundance of ferredoxin.

Fig. S7. ROS accumulation in leaves.

Fig. S8. Abundance of PetC protein.

Supplementary Figure S1-S8

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr Raquel Esteban for providing assistance with OJIP analyses and data interpretation. We acknowledge M.J. Villafranca for technical assistance. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (AGL2016-79868) and from the Basque Government (UPV/EHU-GV IT-932-16). MA is a holder of a PhD fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education (FPU13/01675).

References

  1. Allen JF. 1992. Protein phosphorylation in regulation of photosynthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1098, 275–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen JF. 2003. Botany. State transitions—a question of balance. Science 299, 1530–1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen JF. 2017. Why we need to know the structure of phosphorylated chloroplast light-harvesting complex II. Physiologia Plantarum 161, 28–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Belkhodja R, Morales F, Quilez R, López-Millán AF, Abadía A, Abadía J. 1998. Iron deficiency causes changes in chlorophyll fluorescence due to the reduction in the dark of the Photosystem II acceptor side. Photosynthesis Research 56, 265–276. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bellafiore S, Barneche F, Peltier G, Rochaix JD. 2005. State transitions and light adaptation require chloroplast thylakoid protein kinase STN7. Nature 433, 892–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett J, Shaw EK, Michel H. 1988. Cytochrome b6f complex is required for phosphorylation of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b complex II in chloroplast photosynthetic membranes. European Journal of Biochemistry 171, 95–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonardi V, Pesaresi P, Becker T, Schleiff E, Wagner R, Pfannschmidt T, Jahns P, Leister D. 2005. Photosystem II core phosphorylation and photosynthetic acclimation require two different protein kinases. Nature 437, 1179–1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Breyton C. 2000. Conformational changes in the cytochrome b6f complex induced by inhibitor binding. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 13195–13201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chuartzman SG, Nevo R, Shimoni E, Charuvi D, Kiss V, Ohad I, Brumfeld V, Reich Z. 2008. Thylakoid membrane remodeling during state transitions in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 20, 1029–1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Corneille S, Cournac L, Guedeney G, Havaux M, Peltier G. 1998. Reduction of the plastoquinone pool by exogenous NADH and NADPH in higher plant chloroplasts. Characterization of a NAD(P)H-plastoquinone oxidoreductase activity. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1363, 59–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cornic G, Briantais JM. 1991. Partitioning of photosynthetic electron flow between CO2 and O2 reduction in a C3 leaf (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at different CO2 concentrations and during drought stress. Planta 183, 178–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Courteille A, Vesa S, Sanz-Barrio R, Cazalé AC, Becuwe-Linka N, Farran I, Havaux M, Rey P, Rumeau D. 2013. Thioredoxin m4 controls photosynthetic alternative electron pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 161, 508–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Crepin A, Caffarri S. 2015. The specific localizations of phosphorylated Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 isoforms reveal the role of Lhcb2 in the formation of the PSI–LHCII supercomplex in Arabidopsis during state transitions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1847, 1539–1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Da Q, Sun T, Wang M, Jin H, Li M, Feng D, Wang J, Wang HB, Liu B. 2018. M-type thioredoxins are involved in the xanthophyll cycle and proton motive force to alter NPQ under low-light conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Reports 37, 279–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dekker JP, Boekema EJ. 2005. Supramolecular organization of thylakoid membrane proteins in green plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1706, 12–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Depège N, Bellafiore S, Rochaix JD. 2003. Role of chloroplast protein kinase Stt7 in LHCII phosphorylation and state transition in Chlamydomonas. Science 299, 1572–1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dietzel L, Bräutigam K, Pfannschmidt T. 2008. Photosynthetic acclimation: state transitions and adjustment of photosystem stoichiometry–functional relationships between short-term and long-term light quality acclimation in plants. FEBS Journal 275, 1080–1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Escoubas JM, Lomas M, LaRoche J, Falkowski PG. 1995. Light intensity regulation of cab gene transcription is signaled by the redox state of the plastoquinone pool. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92, 10237–10241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fernández-San Millán A, Aranjuelo I, Douthe C, Nadal M, Ancín M, Larraya L, Farran I, Flexas J, Veramendi J. 2018. Physiological performance of transplastomic tobacco plants overexpressing aquaporin AQP1 in chloroplast membranes. Journal of Experimental Botany 69, 3661–3673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Finazzi G, Rappaport F, Furia A, Fleischmann M, Rochaix JD, Zito F, Forti G. 2002. Involvement of state transitions in the switch between linear and cyclic electron flow in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. EMBO Reports 3, 280–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Frenkel M, Bellafiore S, Rochaix JD, Jansson S. 2007. Hierarchy amongst photosynthetic acclimation responses for plant fitness. Physiologia Plantarum 129, 455–459. [Google Scholar]
  22. Friso G, Giacomelli L, Ytterberg AJ, Peltier JB, Rudella A, Sun Q, Wijk KJ. 2004. In-depth analysis of the thylakoid membrane proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts: new proteins, new functions, and a plastid proteome database. The Plant Cell 16, 478–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gal A, Hauska G, Herrmann R, Ohad I. 1990. Interaction between light harvesting chlorophyll-a/b protein (LHCII) kinase and cytochrome b6/f complex. In vitro control of kinase activity. Journal of Biological Chemistry 265, 19742–19749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gal A, Schuster G, Frid D, Canaani O, Schwieger HG, Ohad I. 1988. Role of the cytochrome b6f complex in the redox-controlled activity of Acetabularia thylakoid protein kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 263, 7785–7791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Galka P, Santabarbara S, Khuong TT, Degand H, Morsomme P, Jennings RC, Boekema EJ, Caffarri S. 2012. Functional analyses of the plant photosystem I–light-harvesting complex II supercomplex reveal that light-harvesting complex II loosely bound to photosystem II is a very efficient antenna for photosystem I in state II. The Plant Cell 24, 2963–2978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Geigenberger P, Thormählen I, Daloso DM, Fernie AR. 2017. The unprecedented versatility of the plant thioredoxin system. Trends in Plant Science 22, 249–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Genty B, Briantais J-M, Baker NR. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990, 87–92. [Google Scholar]
  28. Herbstová M, Tietz S, Kinzel C, Turkina MV, Kirchhoff H. 2012. Architectural switch in plant photosynthetic membranes induced by light stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109, 20130–20135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hou CX, Pursiheimo S, Rintamäki E, Aro E-M. 2002. Environmental and metabolic control of LHCII protein phosphorylation: revealing the mechanisms for dual regulation of the LHCII kinase. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 1515–1525. [Google Scholar]
  30. Järvi S, Suorsa M, Paakkarinen V, Aro EM. 2011. Optimized native gel systems for separation of thylakoid protein complexes: novel super- and mega-complexes. Biochemical Journal 439, 207–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Johnson MP. 2018. Metabolic regulation of photosynthetic membrane structure tunes electron transfer function. Biochemical Journal 475, 1225–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. König J, Baier M, Horling F, Kahmann U, Harris G, Schürmann P, Dietz K-J. 2002. The plant-specific function of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin-mediated detoxification of peroxides in the redox-hierarchy of photosynthetic electron flux. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 5738–5743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kouril R, Zygadlo A, Arteni AA, de Wit CD, Dekker JP, Jensen PE, Scheller HV, Boekema EJ. 2005. Structural characterization of a complex of photosystem I and light-harvesting complex II of Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemistry 44, 10935–10940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kral JP, Edwards GE. 1992. Relationship between photosystem II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves. Physiologia Plantarum 86, 180–187. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kramer DM, Johnson G, Kiirats O, Edwards GE. 2004. New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes. Photosynthesis Research 79, 209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lemeille S, Rochaix JD. 2010. State transitions at the crossroad of thylakoid signalling pathways. Photosynthesis Research 106, 33–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lemeille S, Willig A, Depège-Fargeix N, Delessert C, Bassi R, Rochaix JD. 2009. Analysis of the chloroplast protein kinase Stt7 during state transitions. PLoS Biology 7, e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lennartz K, Plücken H, Seidler A, Westhoff P, Bechtold N, Meierhoff K. 2001. HCF164 encodes a thioredoxin-like protein involved in the biogenesis of the cytochrome b6f complex in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 13, 2539–2551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lichtenthaler HK. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lindahl M, Yang DH, Andersson B. 1995. Regulatory proteolysis of the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein of photosystem II by a light-induced membrane-associated enzymic system. European Journal of Biochemistry 231, 503–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Luciński R, Jackowski G. 2013. AtFtsH heterocomplex-mediated degradation of apoproteins of the major light harvesting complex of photosystem II (LHCII) in response to stresses. Journal of Plant Physiology 170, 1082–1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Morales F, Abadía A, Abadía J. 1991. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photon yield of oxygen evolution in iron-deficient sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves. Plant Physiology 97, 886–893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Motohashi K, Hisabori T. 2006. HCF164 receives reducing equivalents from stromal thioredoxin across the thylakoid membrane and mediates reduction of target proteins in the thylakoid lumen. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 35039–35047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Motohashi K, Hisabori T. 2010. CcdA is a thylakoid membrane protein required for the transfer of reducing equivalents from stroma to thylakoid lumen in the higher plant chloroplast. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 13, 1169–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Naranjo B, Diaz-Espejo A, Lindahl M, Cejudo FJ. 2016. Type-f thioredoxins have a role in the short-term activation of carbon metabolism and their loss affects growth under short-day conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany 67, 1951–1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nikkanen L, Rintamäki E. 2014. Thioredoxin-dependent regulatory networks in chloroplasts under fluctuating light conditions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369, 20130224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Okegawa Y, Motohashi K. 2015. Chloroplastic thioredoxin m functions as a major regulator of Calvin cycle enzymes during photosynthesis in vivo. The Plant Journal 84, 900–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Page ML, Hamel PP, Gabilly ST, Zegzouti H, Perea JV, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Theg SM, Christensen SK, Merchant S. 2004. A homolog of prokaryotic thiol disulfide transporter CcdA is required for the assembly of the cytochrome b6f complex in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 32474–32482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pérez-Ruiz JM, Spínola MC, Kirchsteiger K, Moreno J, Sahrawy M, Cejudo FJ. 2006. Rice NTRC is a high-efficiency redox system for chloroplast protection against oxidative damage. The Plant Cell 18, 2356–2368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pesaresi P, Hertle A, Pribil M, et al. . 2009. Arabidopsis STN7 kinase provides a link between short- and long-term photosynthetic acclimation. The Plant Cell 21, 2402–2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Pietrzykowska M, Suorsa M, Semchonok DA, Tikkanen M, Boekema EJ, Aro EM, Jansson S. 2014. The light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding proteins Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 play complementary roles during state transitions in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 26, 3646–3660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pribil M, Labs M, Leister D. 2014. Structure and dynamics of thylakoids in land plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 1955–1972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Puthiyaveetil S. 2011. A mechanism for regulation of chloroplast LHC II kinase by plastoquinol and thioredoxin. FEBS Letters 585, 1717–1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rey P, Sanz-Barrio R, Innocenti G, Ksas B, Courteille A, Rumeau D, Issakidis-Bourguet E, Farran I. 2013. Overexpression of plastidial thioredoxins f and m differentially alters photosynthetic activity and response to oxidative stress in tobacco plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 4, 390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rintamäki E, Kettunen R, Aro E-M. 1996. Differential D1 dephosphorylation in functional and photodamaged photosystem II centers. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 14870–14875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rintamäki E, Martinsuo P, Pursiheimo S, Aro E-M. 2000. Cooperative regulation of light-harvesting complex II phosphorylation via the plastoquinol and ferredoxin–thioredoxin system in chloroplasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 11644–11649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rintamäki E, Salonen M, Suoranta UM, Carlberg I, Andersson B, Aro EM. 1997. Phosphorylation of light-harvesting complex II and photosystem II core proteins shows different irradiance-dependent regulation in vivo. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, 30476–30482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sanz-Barrio R, Corral-Martinez P, Ancin M, Segui-Simarro JM, Farran I. 2013. Overexpression of plastidial thioredoxin f leads to enhanced starch accumulation in tobacco leaves. Plant Biotechnology Journal 11, 618–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sanz-Barrio R, Millán AF, Corral-Martínez P, Seguí-Simarro JM, Farran I. 2011. Tobacco plastidial thioredoxins as modulators of recombinant protein production in transgenic chloroplasts. Plant Biotechnology Journal 9, 639–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Schürmann P, Buchanan BB. 2008. The ferredoxin/thioredoxin system of oxygenic photosynthesis. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 10, 1235–1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schuster G, Dewit M, Staehelin LA, Ohad I. 1986. Transient inactivation of the thylakoid photosystem II light-harvesting protein kinase system and concomitant changes in intramembrane particle size during photoinhibition of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Journal of Cell Biology 103, 71–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Shapiguzov A, Chai X, Fucile G, Longoni P, Zhang L, Rochaix JD. 2016. Activation of the Stt7/STN7 kinase through dynamic interactions with the cytochrome b6f complex. Plant Physiology 171, 82–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sharkey TD, Bernacchi CJ, Farquhar GD, Singsaas EL. 2007. Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 30, 1035–1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Strasserf RJ, Srivastava A, Govindjee. 1995. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochemistry and Photobiology 61, 32–42. [Google Scholar]
  65. Thormählen I, Zupok A, Rescher J, et al. . 2017. Thioredoxins play a crucial role in dynamic acclimation of photosynthesis in fluctuating light. Molecular Plant 10, 168–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Tikkanen M, Grieco M, Aro EM. 2011. Novel insights into plant light-harvesting complex II phosphorylation and ‘state transitions’. Trends in Plant Science 16, 126–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tikkanen M, Grieco M, Kangasjärvi S, Aro EM. 2010. Thylakoid protein phosphorylation in higher plant chloroplasts optimizes electron transfer under fluctuating light. Plant Physiology 152, 723–735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Tikkanen M, Nurmi M, Suorsa M, Danielsson R, Mamedov F, Styring S, Aro EM. 2008. Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of excitation energy distribution between the two photosystems in higher plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1777, 425–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Tóth SZ, Schansker G, Strasser RJ. 2005. In intact leaves, the maximum fluorescence level (FM) is independent of the redox state of the plastoquinone pool: a DCMU-inhibition study. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1708, 275–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Vainonen JP, Hansson M, Vener AV. 2005. STN8 protein kinase in Arabidopsis thaliana is specific in phosphorylation of photosystem II core proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, 33679–33686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Vener AV, van Kan PJM, Rich PR, Ohad I, Andersson B. 1997. Plastoquinol at the quinol oxidation site of reduced cytochrome bf mediates signal transduction between light and protein phosphorylation: thylakoid protein kinase deactivation by a single-turnover flash. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94, 1585–1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang F, Qi Y, Malnoë A, Choquet Y, Wollman FA, de Vitry C. 2017. The high light response and redox control of thylakoid ftsh protease in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Molecular Plant 10, 99–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang P, Liu J, Liu B, et al. . 2013. Evidence for a role of chloroplastic m-type thioredoxins in the biogenesis of photosystem II in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 163, 1710–1728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wientjes E, Drop B, Kouřil R, Boekema EJ, Croce R. 2013a During state 1 to state 2 transition in Arabidopsis thaliana, the photosystem II supercomplex gets phosphorylated but does not disassemble. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288, 32821–32826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wientjes E, van Amerongen H, Croce R. 2013b LHCII is an antenna of both photosystems after long-term acclimation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1827, 420–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wollman F-A, Lemaire C. 1988. Studies on kinase-controlled state transitions in Photosystem II and b6f mutants from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii which lack quinone-binding proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 933, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wood WHJ, MacGregor-Chatwin C, Barnett SFH, Mayneord GE, Huang X, Hobbs JK, Hunter CN, Johnson MP. 2018. Dynamic thylakoid stacking regulates the balance between linear and cyclic photosynthetic electron transfer. Nature Plants 4, 116–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wunder T, Liu Q, Aseeva E, Bonardi V, Leister D, Pribil M. 2013a Control of STN7 transcript abundance and transient STN7 dimerisation are involved in the regulation of STN7 activity. Planta 237, 541–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wunder T, Xu W, Liu Q, Wanner G, Leister D, Pribil M. 2013b The major thylakoid protein kinases STN7 and STN8 revisited: effects of altered STN8 levels and regulatory specificities of the STN kinases. Frontiers in Plant Science 4, 417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Yang DH, Andersson B, Aro EM, Ohad I. 2001. The redox state of the plastoquinone pool controls the level of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein complex II (LHC II) during photoacclimation. Photosynthesis Research 68, 163–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Yang DH, Webster J, Adam Z, Lindahl M, Andersson B. 1998. Induction of acclimative proteolysis of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein of photosystem II in response to elevated light intensities. Plant Physiology 118, 827–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zelisko A, Garcia-Lorenzo M, Jackowski G, Jansson S, Funk C. 2005. AtFtsH6 is involved in the degradation of the light-harvesting complex II during high-light acclimation and senescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 13699–13704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zito F, Finazzi G, Delosme R, Nitschke W, Picot D, Wollman FA. 1999. The Qo site of cytochrome b6f complexes controls the activation of the LHCII kinase. EMBO Journal 18, 2961–2969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1-S8

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES